Thread has been deleted
Last comment
+144 fps all the time
Portugal mystummyhurt 
is it normal to not get more than 144 fps all the time with these specs when there is a lot of action, for example smokes, a lot players in a same place my fps go down to 100 fps or less GTX 1060 6GB 8 GB Ram AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
2019-06-11 00:10
Germany SehrNetterKerl 
have the exact same build expect gtx 1060 3gb so yes, i get in mm game or faceit around 200-250 and ffa around 150-170
2019-06-11 00:12
in ffa my fps drop to 90,80
2019-06-11 00:14
Germany SehrNetterKerl 
ok thats weird, whats your settings?
2019-06-11 00:16
all low 1024x768 stretched monitor 144hz
2019-06-11 00:17
Lo again, if it's a 144Hz monitor then you have a GREAT monitor. This mean's you have more than 2x the refreash rate & FPS of most of the other people you play against. Most of the people you play against have 60Hz monitors, even if they turn vsync Off, they will have a much lower True FPS than you cause the monitor just cannot display more than 60Hz refreash rate. You have the advantage in terms of FPS.
2019-06-11 00:23
found gold nova here
2019-06-11 00:24
North America codered433 
Can’t confirm
2019-06-11 00:31
can 100% confirm that he's retarded and gold nova if he plays csgo with vsync enabled
2019-06-11 00:33
France mdK_ 
lmao he plays with a 60Hz and thinks more than the half of ppl he plays against are playing with a 60Hz too lmao
2019-06-11 01:53
Korea Displease 
2019-06-11 15:29
Wrong on the Gold Nova bit & wrong on the rest. If Monitor refresh's @ 144Hz, then True Framerate with a good GPU will also be 144 FPS. Monitor cannot go faster by magic.... net_graph may say 500FPS but monitor cannot display 500FPS, can it ?
2019-06-11 00:33
0/8 bait
2019-06-11 00:34
so you're saying that you don't need more fps than your monitor hz? if i have 60hz monitor i can play with 60 fps?
2019-06-11 00:35
I said, i can't wait to buy a 240Hz monitor & then enable VSYNC so that i get a solid 240 FPS. How can a 60Hz Monitor display 240 fps if it's refresh rate is 60Hz ?
2019-06-11 00:37
so you think 60 fps is enough to play on 60hz monitor?
2019-06-11 00:39
If you're 60Hz monitor refresh's 60 Times per second & only 60 Times per second, cause it's Locked to that, then how is it able to display 240FPS+ if it only Refresh's 60 Times per second. Actual Answer with Physics, to explain it plz? Provide actual answer instead of snarky comment's. Thank you.
2019-06-11 00:48
Just answer yes or no. Do you think 60 fps is enough to play on 60hz monitor? YES OR NO i dont need long answer
2019-06-11 00:50
Lets try to put it this way. A 60hz monitor refreshes the screen 60 times per second. Therefore, a 60hz monitor is only capable of outputting 60fps. It can still feel smoother to play at a higher framerate than your monitor can display however, because input lag with your mouse will be reduced. You might also start to see tearing though, which happens when your videocard is rendering frames faster than your monitor can display them. Asus actually sells a nice line of 120hz displays, and if they have some reason to exist other than their capability to display 120fps, I'd like to hear it.
2019-06-11 01:02
A quick question for you if you don't mind. How does a Monitor with a 60Hz refresh rate display 90 FPS ?
2019-06-11 01:07
It doesn't but the fps difference is still very noticeable. You can see huge difference between 60fps and 90fps or 300fps. I just wanted your opinion if 60fps was enough to play csgo which it isn't
2019-06-11 01:16
Croatia argm 
no you cannot see a difference between 60, 90 or 300 fps, because your eye can only refresh with 25 Hz - let's say due to no triggered input for your eye, you can distinguish up to 30 Hz. the thing is: net_graph shows you an average value, so it is not 60 Hz all the time. it can be even down to 20 fps or less for a short period of time. thats what you can see, on average it's still 60 Hz. So a 60 Hz screen is more then fine, everything else is just imagination and advertisement from screen producers and some ppl really fall for it. Unless you don't use 3D applications, 60 Hz are more then enough. (the screen refresh rate is quite stable - the problem is the pc, so 60 fps are problemetic - because it's an average value) PS xbox even cuts the upper limit of fps to 60, to obtain a stable value and have lower standard deviation of the fps.
2019-06-11 17:26
found antoher retard
2019-06-11 20:08
Croatia argm 
oh I forgot that you are super human with high speed eyes!!
2019-06-11 21:04
Xizt | 
Czech Republic davskal 
eyes don't see world in fps you mongol
2019-06-12 01:10
Croatia argm 
oh actually they do. It's not like a screen which builds up a picture from top left to bottom right line by line, but as soon as a photon enters reacts with your retina it induces protein folding, a subsequent pulse is send via nerves to your brain. the thing is that the proteins cannot react with another photon when folded, they first need to unfold, and - believe it or not - it takes time. sure all the proteins are not working together like in a screen, which is updated with a certain rate. the proteins are triggered whenever a photon comes. on average a human eye can distinguish time differences of around 40 ms (25 Hz). faster things wouldn't be able to be processed by our brain anyway. yah, maybe the terminology "fps" (also refresh rate or whatever) might not be accurate, but the meaning is clear I think. but "high speed eyes" makes sense so before start to flame: think a bit
2019-06-12 10:15
Xizt | 
Czech Republic davskal 
think a bit before saying there's no difference between looking at 60fps and 300fps on a 60Hz screen
2019-06-12 10:17
Croatia argm 
yah, I just explained it to you ;D there is no difference looking at 60 Hz or 300 Hz (unless you use 3D which cut fps in half). from the screen there is no difference because you cannot see it, 60 Hz is by far more than what your eye can realise. everything is imagination/falling for bad advertisement. I told aswell that cs with 60 - 100 fps can seem to be laggy, because net_graph only shows you an average value (if it would really plot the actual value you couldn't read). which means it is not always 60-100 fps and easily drops to 20 fps, that's what you can see - but it's not the screen Or just tell me about your thoughts about this topic? do you have any evidence that confirms a difference between 60 and 300 Hz? enlighten me instead of just saying "think"
2019-06-12 11:26
SGM | 
Hungary sgitheach 
2019-06-11 15:29
vsync causes the worst input lag. and i've never seen tearing in csgo on my 60hz monitor at 300fps.
2019-06-11 01:12
Dude, you aren't getting 300FPS. Your 60Hz monitor can only output 60 FPS. Your Monitor refresh's once every 1/60 of a second. How can a piece of equipment that is locked to 60 pictures per second display more than that per second? Genuine Question.
2019-06-11 01:18
okay you're baiting
2019-06-11 01:19
You are wrong again, i was not/do not bait. Was an actual honest question.... Which you are unable to answer. Off to sleep.. GN
2019-06-11 01:26
By your logic you don't see 144hz because your eyes can only see 24fps. HOW CAN EYE SEE MORE THAN 24fps IF IT'S LOCKED TO 24 PICTURES PER SECOND?
2019-06-11 01:30
Don't fucking shout at me dickhead. Google it. Or read this.
2019-06-11 01:36
No need to call anyone names. Thank you.
2019-06-11 11:13
Fair enough, i apologise for name calling. No excuse but he really got on my nerves. It won't happen again.
2019-06-11 20:24
Higher FPS means lower input lag, so higher fps is always better regardless of refresh rate.
2019-06-11 15:32
Yes but you will still only see however many pictures your monitor can display per second, no matter what. Have a GTX 1080, is totally wasted with my 60Hz iiyama Monitor. Which is why i want to get a 240Hz monitor as fast as possible.... Or maybe a G-Sync but the cost is horrific...
2019-06-11 20:36
You don't need a gsync monitor, gsync works with freesync now and irrelevant about what you can see, lower input lag is still desirable.
2019-06-11 22:44
Poland halucyn0 
can confirm, budget gsync works perfectly
2019-06-12 00:55
I know what ur saying, but there's definitely a noticeable difference between fps_max 75 or fps_max 300, even when you play on a 75 hzscreen.
2019-06-12 10:20
I never said there wasnt
2019-06-12 16:33
Yes or no i dont need long answer i like that
2019-06-11 15:29
cause the refresg rate of the monitor dont line up perfectly so more fps is always better
2019-06-11 22:47
sure nt gn
2019-06-11 00:40
Finland v3tu 
This is wrong and I explained it in another thread, cba now but just mentioned. In short, the monitor doesn't refresh image by image but pixel by pixel, so the newer data it has available the better. There are a lot more actions going on per second than 144 for a 144hz panel. Also, in csgo, fps number that is not in the hundreds implies relatively high frametime variance.
2019-06-12 22:02
North America Straf3R 
I also find it depends on the map youre playing. I have this problem too, and this a a problem with PCs of all kinds of specs.
2019-06-11 01:51
steel | 
Brazil WdoFer 
Check ram frequency bro
2019-06-12 01:11
2019-06-11 00:12
Hiya, what sort of Monitor do you have? 60Hz? 120Hz? 144Hz? If your Monitor can't display more FPS than this then what is the problem ? Genuine Question! 1st suggestion, get a 240 FPS Monitor.
2019-06-11 00:18
Brazil oneS2 
nice uk logic
2019-06-11 00:20
Hiya, even with vsync Off it's a waste of time with a lower Hz Monitor. If you have a 60Hz monitor, you get 60 frames per second, no matter what net_graph 3 says.... The monitor is Limited to 60 Hz. My next purchase will be a 240Hz Monitor, then i can put vsync on & get a solid 240 FPS.
2019-06-11 00:28
are you retarded?
2019-06-11 00:29
i got 144Hz
2019-06-11 01:00
Yes m8, so you get a solid 144 fps, if you have a good GPU, correct ?
2019-06-11 01:04
I get 20fps and S2 im good I know
2019-06-11 00:14
nice man
2019-06-11 00:16
also 1.6k hours thumbs up
2019-06-11 00:16
cool man
2019-06-11 00:17
fps_max 0 and disable vsync
2019-06-11 00:17
how can i disable vsync
2019-06-11 22:53
you should be able to get over 144. not sure how tech savvy you are but what speed is your 1500x at? if you OC'd it manually, make sure its stable bc if it isnt you would get weird frame drops. if you havent then you can always start my manually OC'ing it, a decent starting place is to force 3.85 or so ghz to all cores. Out of the box it should be 3.5 with an auto boost to 3.7, but usually advertised auto boosts dont apply to all cores just a few at a time. Another killer for frames is msaa. set it off or no more than 2x if you just cant live without it. i assume you are running 1080p 144hz? if youre running at 1440p you might run into issues, im not familiar with a 1060 running 1440p on cs.
2019-06-11 00:20
yea im on 1080p 144hz
2019-06-11 00:29
Do you happen to run with an overlay for frames/temps/etc? cs doesnt play nice with some of those and youll lose a ton of frames. Check your task manager if you happen to have a 2nd monitor, if cpu is maxed then the only thing you can do is try and min settings that are mostly effected by cpu or to mildly OC your cpu. If the gpu is pegged at 100% in task manager then the easiest solution is to reduce your resolution slightly, reduce graphics settings, or experiment with trying to oc your gpu slightly, but now a days gpus are already going to autoboost to their max anyways so thats not going to go very well tbh. What exact 1060 do you have? download its manufacturers software to make sure that its properly auto boosting and also set an aggressive fan curve, the autoboost will throttle itself at higher temps, the cooler it stays the further it will push itself automatically.
2019-06-11 00:34
I will answer everything after i finish this game, just a few minutes
2019-06-11 00:41
Serbia nocturnSRB 
are u winning at least kappa
2019-06-11 00:42
yea 10-6
2019-06-11 00:42
you don't need any of his shit just disable vsync and put "fps_max 0" in console and you're good
2019-06-11 00:45
If he already has vysnc off it wont make a difference. default fps max is above 144 anyways so he would be above 144 even with default fps max on. anyways dont be rude, im giving the guy an actual answer to his issue not "turn off vsync" as if thats the end all be all answer.
2019-06-11 00:55
Russia mmmmmmajestic 
Disable vsync, gsync or freesync.
2019-06-11 00:43
ok ty I will try after the game
2019-06-11 00:50
2019-06-11 00:53
yes disable everything. and in game too
2019-06-11 00:58
Russia mmmmmmajestic 
Yeah, disable both.
2019-06-11 01:48
Canada CHlNA 
With those specs, you should be getting around 200-300 even with the activities such as players and smokes. You play at low in 1024 which should give you more fps than usually. I have i5 7400 and gtx 1050 ti 4gb and 8 GB ram, and I get around 200-300 on low in 1280x960. You have a problem with your csgo config or your pc. Try copying all your config stuff down, hud, ViewModel, crosshair, etc. And delete all your csgo "CONFIG FILES", not game. And then launch the game and put back all your settings into consle. Here is a video where it teachs you to get more fps in csgo. Im not sure, but I also think that there is a segment in it that uses this technique to get more fps. Hope this helps.
2019-06-11 00:46
Alright i will try when i get home
2019-06-11 12:58
Brazil goatzera 
2019-06-11 01:26
sorry man
2019-06-11 01:28
Israel soprendo 
If you're not on Ryzen you're doing it wrong
2019-06-11 23:08
Brazil goatzera 
I will not even discuss
2019-06-11 23:25
Denmark Sh0z 
Cuz you know you´ve already lost? :)
2019-06-12 00:59
if you have vsync on it maxes at 144
2019-06-11 01:27
Brazil llskll 
If you don't fix it yet. Try this At video settings of cs go Enable multicore rendering
2019-06-11 01:29
Alright I will try when i get home
2019-06-11 12:59
Brazil llskll +mat_queue_mode -2 I really recommend you to try that command at launcher options. Must be the same of enable multicore rendering but try everything for get better fps =)
2019-06-12 00:20
2019-06-12 00:45
before the command my Average framerate: 210 after the command Average framerate: 217.58 not bad
2019-06-12 00:54
"AMD Ryzen 5 1500X" its because
2019-06-11 15:23
2019-06-11 17:11
go buy i7 8700 non K + GTX 1060 = ez 400 fps
2019-06-11 15:24
Latvia kamixx 
rx 470 4gb ffa its sometimes 150 or less but mm games 200fps
2019-06-11 15:25
Ryzen cpu especially the first gen is not good enough for high fps...Perhaps the new Ryzen 3000 series will change that so i would recommend just upgrading your cpu to get very high fps...
2019-06-11 23:10
yea thats what i was thinking too
2019-06-12 00:45
Portugal P1nt0 
Fps max 0 meu filho
2019-06-12 00:46
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X thats why
2019-06-12 00:48
i was thinking of getting this one later this year
2019-06-12 21:56
have you ever tried to update your graphic card?
2019-06-12 00:57
u sure you dont have Vsync turned on?
2019-06-12 01:07
2019-06-12 21:53
United States Oklahoma_ 
I have i5 6600 RX 570 8gb ram and still get 300+ fps consistently so yes you have a major issue
2019-06-12 01:14
NEO | 
Poland siuchol 
thats kinda sick win 7 gf 970 i7 4790k 250 300 fps win 10 fps downs to 120 on dm ^^ going back to win 7
2019-06-12 10:19
amd sucks for cs. just get intel. i got i5 9400f for 140 euro and i get +250 all the time.
2019-06-12 21:55
2019-06-12 21:59
my motherboard doesnt support Intel CPUs sad
2019-06-12 21:59
if cs is your main activity, you shoudlnt have bought amd at all. amd is only good because of more threads, but in cs they dont matter.
2019-06-12 22:04
Finland Autisthicc 
wtf how cant you run csgo its 2019
2019-06-12 21:59
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.