Thread has been deleted
Last comment
1920x1080
 | 
United States DaddyLongSchlong 
It's 2019 and people still play 1024x768, 800x600 etc. Xddd Give me one reason why ur res is better than 1920x1080
2019-07-18 03:25
#1
 | 
Turkey CihannT112 
For better fps
2019-07-18 03:26
#20
 | 
Other zj2 
It doesnt matter on nowadays graphic cards, even more so my game feels better on native res and alt tab is instant
2019-07-18 04:06
#39
 | 
Argentina fhaep 
the fact that youve said graphic cards and not cpu means that you dont know anything about fps in csgo
2019-07-18 04:30
#40
 | 
Czech Republic Mibrdisband 
+1 yikes
2019-07-18 04:32
#48
KRIMZ | 
Finland flyingV 
+1
2019-07-18 04:40
And probably use a monitor with 60 hz
2019-07-18 04:49
If you really have trouble to get 240+ fps in 1920:1080 your computer is either very old or thermal throttling because you bought it from your local store instead of custom building it. Any GTX 7xx card and i5 can achieve a smooth experience in full HD. Even a Ryzen with the integrated graph1c chip gets you a playable result lmao.
2019-07-18 05:35
well fuck, i have a 2017 Acer laptop and I can barely manage 60 on 1024x768... I cant afford a new computer either as im a broke af student and bought this one for school. any tips?
2019-07-19 03:58
Oof man i thought canadians and americans had thousands of dollars worth gaming pcs
2019-07-19 04:04
i mean when your broke in school and you ask your mom to buy you a laptop what do you think is gonna happen
2019-07-19 04:05
But you guys are not supposed to be broke
2019-07-19 04:14
Well im sorry that school is fucking expensive its like 7k per year not even counting dorms books clothes food etc... I asked my mom to buy me a computer for my birthday last year and this is what i got lol
2019-07-19 04:15
Lol i feel you brother the same happened with one of my best friend. I helped him get 80-90 fps on 800x600
2019-07-19 04:18
yeah. I mean ive done alot of work on this thing to try and make it better. I deleted all my bloatware, have some programs that make my cpu only focus on a single application if i tell it to etc. I used to play on 800-600 but I upgraded because I could finally run a res higher
2019-07-19 04:20
Good for you then
2019-07-19 04:21
Completely disgusting that education is so expensive in some countries. Capitalism has its boundaries and it doesn't work as intended if only those can get rich that already are because they can easily afford education. Education is the one thing that should never be denied to anyone. In Germany, studying at an elite university costs *up to* some 100 bucks per semester but you also get a universal ticket for buses in the region and other good stuff. Some unis don't even ask for any tuition fee at all and it works great. I think that has to be the desired state.
2019-07-19 05:12
Gimme 3k euros then so we can talk.. ez talking this shit when you can have a very nice pc and monitor. Come play 240 fps 1080p in my dell 5000. You should know that you belong o a monetary elite, kid. People dying from diarreah and you think its odd not to have the latest graphics you your pc.
2019-07-19 04:05
I give you 500€ and build you a PC that reaches 200+ fps on full HD in CS:GO easily. I have no illusions about the fact that I'm "belonging to the monetary elite". All I said that a GTX 7xx + an early i5 is enough if you have no thermal throttle. I never said that you need the latest GPU, in fact I told you quite the opposite. Furthermore it is no shame in reducing the resolution if you have no good PC to achieve a playable result. Although, it is a shame to pretend that most people that play CS are so poor that they die from a regular cold. If they did they wouldn't play video games - there are much better things to do in such a situation. Sometimes it helps to actually read and think before blindly spreading hate. Also it is not odd to have any kind of PC if you don't want one. If you have any kind of PC to play CS:GO with you *should* most of the times be able to save up and then custom build a PC. Expected from Bra71l nt 0/8
2019-07-19 05:04
I wasnt talking about the cs community only, but whatever. Here in Brasil I need 500 euros just for a mother board and processor. And regular ones. So I just think its nonsense to be surprised by people using low res. When pros do, it might be awkward indeed.
2019-07-19 14:35
lmfao and im on my laptop (i54310M) ( integrated gpu ) getting around 100 fps at 800x600 lowest possible
2019-08-05 04:48
Laptops don't count as they thermal throttle so much. You probably lose 30% in performance if not more in the summer. If you now say "but my laptop is nice and quiet" then I can assure you that it thermal throttles to achieve that. A desktop will always be superior with the same hardware. Laptops suck. /close
2019-08-05 12:16
And laptops come with additional bloatware (especially anti virus software that is often stealing a lot of resources. Funnily enough the integrated AV of windows has become the best option so any other software is obsolete) that do nothing but steal CPU time in the background. Also I said an i5 + a discrete graphics card which you obviously do not have.
2019-08-05 12:20
ik laptops sucks but this is what i have to use right now, im currently investing at others gears first before getting a decent gaming computer and if you could recommend a good video about how to remove bloatware i would be glad
2019-08-06 04:00
#149
 | 
World memyselfandI 
+1 /case closed, OP is I play 1920*1080. I am not serious enough to bother too much about this, but serious enough to know that CPU matters more than GPU.
2019-07-19 18:07
#162
 | 
Netherlands NELK 
+1
2019-08-05 12:20
+11111 I went from sub 20 to 25 with 16:10
2019-07-18 04:19
#37
 | 
Brazil sinisterkid3 
imagine not running CSGO at 1000fps+ in 2019
2019-07-18 04:29
#75
 | 
North America GatorThePimp 
Or just get better hardware peasant
2019-07-18 05:38
if my pc wasnt garbage id be playing on max ress, feels way better
2019-07-18 03:26
because i like it
2019-07-18 03:27
#4
 | 
Germany cucKingxaxa)) 
my res is better because 2560x1440>1920x1080
2019-07-18 03:27
+1 but where is ur 240hz sir
2019-07-18 03:29
Look for ViewSonic XG2703-GS - 1440p 27" IPS (awesome colors) 165hz GSYNC Got one for 1 year and a half Time to wake up murica
2019-07-18 03:58
240hz is a must for me since i can feel the difference between 165 and 240 and all i want and need is smoothness. Time to wake up baguette
2019-07-18 04:05
2k 165hz > 1080p 240hz btw
2019-07-18 05:34
No. Resolution above full hd is not needed as you shouldn't sit in front of your monitor like xantares. If you sit 20 cm or more behind it it is barely noticeable (for CS:GO) but the 240 is easier to notice compared to the 165 HZ
2019-07-18 05:37
It's unnecessary. Also, i'm talking about general use, 2k 165hz is much, much better for this.
2019-07-18 05:38
#5
f0rest | 
Argentina GZ^ 
2009 pc + playing cs since 1.3
2019-07-18 03:28
1.3 was shit in anything above 640x480 tho
2019-07-18 05:06
#7
draken | 
Thailand Chibaa 
some people prefer the wider models
2019-07-18 03:30
#72
 | 
Norway SaltySausage 
preach
2019-07-18 05:35
playing since 2010
2019-07-18 03:31
Same
2019-07-18 03:36
but i like to play 1366x768 too
2019-07-18 03:36
Imo $200 gpu and you can play on any settings ~300 fps easily
2019-07-18 03:32
been playing FPS religiously since 2006 and started on absolute shit Dell Aspiron Laptops with max res 1366 but played on 1280 for tiny bit better peformance.
2019-07-18 03:47
#13
 | 
Morocco royflord 
got used to it ?
2019-07-18 03:49
#14
 | 
North America daesoulae 
800x600 is better than whatever res ur using because 800x600 is the only way i get above 40 fps
2019-07-18 03:49
#38
f0rest | 
Ireland ElitE_ 
na pc
2019-07-18 04:30
#42
 | 
North America daesoulae 
*lap top not all of us have our mommys buy us expensive things
2019-07-18 04:35
#44
f0rest | 
Ireland ElitE_ 
ever heard of a job?
2019-07-18 04:36
#45
 | 
North America daesoulae 
yea my parents put all the money i make in a bank account for college, i dont get to touch it
2019-07-18 04:38
#57
 | 
Portugal fertzpt 
+1 same bro actually, and then i see all those kids woth beast pc's that can't even control a spray minimally.. and players like me and you stuck with 30-40 fps (on mirage and cache) or 15-30 on dust 2, nuke, inferno
2019-07-18 05:01
I FUCKING UNDERSTAND THIS I barely get 60 on 1024 768 lowest settings cuz I have a laptop and im miles ahead of all my friends in my area who have monstrous gaming pc's
2019-07-19 04:17
#141
 | 
Portugal fertzpt 
Same.. its so annoying
2019-07-19 13:46
Surely you're not implying you're entitled to the same rig because you're better?
2019-07-19 05:10
#140
 | 
Portugal fertzpt 
To be honest i suck at english and I didnt understand fully what you are saying, but if you saying that im implying that my rig is holding me back, yes with no doubts it is, if I have a smoke in front of me i have 8 fps MAX.
2019-07-19 13:45
No that's not what I meant, your rig is obviously holding you back, but surely you don't think you deserve to have the kid's rig because you're more skilled than him.
2019-07-19 17:29
#152
 | 
Portugal fertzpt 
No, that nope, i dont think i deserve the rig because of that, I am happy for those who have it since they can have a real good gaming experience with no hold backs, i just get frustrated thats it, and i just can't control it thats why, the only reason (probably) they aren't as good as other players is because with such a nice rig they will be playing other games instead of cs
2019-07-19 20:35
Havent tried 640x480 yet? Ez 60 fpses men)
2019-07-18 04:38
#47
 | 
North America daesoulae 
then i cant open discord mens
2019-07-18 04:38
Lul why men(
2019-07-18 04:45
#77
 | 
North America daesoulae 
*cant open discord in game, its too small for the discord overlay
2019-07-18 14:08
some pro players uses 800x600 nowadays I remember fnx using 640x480 on CRT`s monitor in 1.6
2019-07-18 04:52
#56
 | 
United States Freakmode 
wasnt that native on most crt monitors?
2019-07-18 04:55
For desktop 1280x1024 in a LG Flatron 17 inch But in 1.6 using 640x or 800x600 most of the CRT monitors of 2002 -2005 could play CS with 100hz in both resolution. If you search in youtube you will see a lot of professional events and players using CRT monitors in 2006 - 2010 because of the 100hz, nowadays that LCD/LED 144hz and 240hz became popular.
2019-07-18 05:03
My eizo 17" crt had 1280x1024 100hz 1024x768 120hz 800x600 140hz 640x480 160hz best ever, i waited so long before i bought my first benq screen, and it even felt bad compare to my good old crt, only with the agon i have now(240hz + freesync), i can start to compare to my old beast! always disliked lcd/led cuz of tearing, but good with gsync and freesync now!
2019-07-18 17:51
Some with me I used to watch Netflix and Amazon Prime so before buy my Alienware 240hz I always change to my LED/CRT 17 inch to play with 100hz And stilll prefer an old nice CRT monitor I think the Syncmaster Samsung had 1280x1024 @ 100hz too But we are in 2019 and the most people that play cs doesn't even know what is play with 144hz/244hz
2019-07-18 23:50
Hear you brother, FPS on any less then 100hz = non playable. ofc it's 120-144-165-240hz now tho, but you know what i mean. Only way netflix or streams are good are on a great quality tv. The file on computer with 720p/1080p with crt screen vs streaming netflix on my monitor now, i don't even watch, cause i think it's so bad quality, i'm just used to great quality so i don't want to downgrade. xP
2019-07-19 03:55
well a crt are to small to watch some movies so i used to change CRT for CS GO and an LED 60hz 19inchs for movies... But I understand if you play CSGO with 300 in a monitor with 60hz you will be playing with 60 fps, the monitor can't read all the FPS. But now I use my Alienware 24 inchs for everything, I use my desktop like TV Videogame, work, porn etc... rofl
2019-07-19 04:08
Yea i agree, not all was perfect for 17" but still better at the 24" cause i dislike lcd/led, but as i said much better now with gsync and freesync. But when i watch same film on netflix on my pc, then watch on tv, can't even compare. maybe netflix is like this only i don't know, looks better if you got the file on computer. Love people with "NASA" pc, and they use 60hz. Always laugh at them, maybe i'm bad. Great, i wished i could do the same, some streaming i don't care for, but most are good tho. Come from the time when we download everything, always looks smoother imo, same with if you have blueray and compare with same at netflix, it will never be close imo. I know am hard to please with this, i did help my brother one time, i even notice he had 60hz on 120hz monitor in desktop after 10sec, i find it so annoying, so you can understand. ^^
2019-07-19 08:07
But for movies doesnt make diference all movies are in 30 fps I though. Yup u can't compare a Blue Ray with anything, I have a box of Back to the Future it's amazing
2019-07-19 13:59
CRT's dont have a native resolution.
2019-07-19 04:56
#15
 | 
Poland misterr_ 
fps but the most important: im used to it for me any higher res feels weird, unnatural
2019-07-18 03:53
#16
 | 
United States theory^ 
makes the heads fatty)
2019-07-18 03:54
but makes the heads real fast))
2019-07-18 03:55
#74
 | 
United States theory^ 
thats why u be fast too men))
2019-07-18 05:37
i was playing 1920 but i have to be like pro player so 1024 only XD
2019-07-18 04:08
Xddd
2019-07-18 04:19
#22
 | 
New Zealand CZR^ 
I play 1440x1080 244hz and I love it. I play so much better on that than I do normal res. Its really a point of opinion
2019-07-18 04:11
1600x1050 master res
2019-07-18 04:13
1680x1050*
2019-07-18 05:06
nope
2019-07-18 05:25
main reason is because i'm so used to it from 1.5. Tried bigger ones and wasn't comfortable at all. Actually I use black bars for the same reason.
2019-07-18 04:17
#25
FalleN | 
Brazil dmn1 
because i feel more confortable playing on it
2019-07-18 04:19
16:10 to balance FPS and scope of visualnessage studf
2019-07-18 04:21
#29
 | 
United States fraus 
i play @16:10 1280x800 and i shit you not as soon as i went to 1080p i could not shoot for shit. not saying its bad im just saying that my reason for using something other than 1280x800
2019-07-18 04:24
#30
 | 
Philippines Eclipsa 
Stretched player models = EZFRAG
2019-07-18 04:24
#31
 | 
Macedonia [toast] 
rofl, r u playing cs for quality?
2019-07-18 04:24
Nah. Im playing cs cuz im lvl 10 faceit 1.7kd.
2019-07-18 04:28
#34
 | 
Macedonia [toast] 
oooff
2019-07-18 04:28
in NA btw xD
2019-07-18 05:23
#80
 | 
France uNLmofo 
it's equal to a LVL3 with 0.88kda in Kirghistan
2019-07-18 17:39
xD
2019-07-18 21:47
the less pixels the more fps
2019-07-18 04:27
The better PC the more fps
2019-07-18 04:29
The better PC the less money in your pocket
2019-07-18 17:34
The more money the less i care
2019-07-18 17:39
800x600 is better for me, more fps and smoothie movement, thicker models, makes me feel like playing classic CS. Too many pixels distract and look awful.
2019-07-18 04:29
#97
 | 
United States Troglxdyte 
...... would you also prefer to see life pixelated in 800x600? Do you enjoy staring through a screen door when looking at the outside?
2019-07-19 04:06
No but it's a silly comparison, life is life and game is game, one is real and sensible, the other is just a simulation, entertainment for the youth. You gotta bring to me a better example.
2019-07-19 04:38
#41
 | 
Czech Republic Mibrdisband 
garbage PC and more FPS + more focus on black bars when I used to play them now I suck cuz I suck on black bars and have to play 1280x800 stretched or some 4:3 stretched res..
2019-07-18 04:33
Xddddd. Imo the focus thing is bullshit.
2019-07-18 04:36
#78
 | 
Czech Republic Mibrdisband 
it is not :/ also if you have big inch monitor its goood
2019-07-18 15:58
best res for high sensitivity
2019-07-18 04:44
xd
2019-07-18 04:46
#52
shoushi | 
Japan TSUKI^ 
Native 120fps go near smoke drop to 50 mens((, I play on 16:10 1000x625
2019-07-18 04:49
#55
 | 
Russia yoloz0r 
bruh, for people who have 60hz, choose 4:3 cuz you can have 75hz, and not 60hz on full hd, and its all preference, some people just like 4:3/16:9
2019-07-18 04:52
#63
 | 
Macau Bent0 
are you sure about this? I believe I used to use 1920x1080 with 60hz overclock to 75hz before (AOC monitor) ?????
2019-07-18 05:21
#86
 | 
Russia yoloz0r 
not every1 has AOC monitors tho :D almost every monitor that has 75hz support works only on 4:3
2019-07-18 18:00
#59
 | 
Slovakia OndroL 
Back then real reason was more FPS, now days it's all about habit, all people who played back then are used to thicker models, black bars etc. ... So if you started play CS:GO recently you would be better with native resolution of your Monitor.
2019-07-18 05:05
#62
 | 
United States Degree|CSGO 
Stretched
2019-07-18 05:17
#64
FalleN | 
Brazil Salies 
It's a matter of comfort. Most people used to play on 4:3 res in 1.6, so when they went to CS:GO, they kept the same res with a equivalent (pretty sure it's the same) sensitivity so the adaptation curve was eased. Some people even started in GO, but since their PCs couldn't run the game in higher resolutions, they went for the low ones and keep it even if they get a better PC (because they're used to that res/sens - res interferes in sens). I started in CS:GO playing in 1080p, because my PC could run it, so I'll keep with that 4ever even if I get a PC that can run 4K. In short, changing resolution can be a pain so people just stay with what they're used to.
2019-07-18 05:22
I cant play 16 9 =T feels like cod or whatever kid games the most "pubg kid" res I can use is 1680 1050, 16:9 just looks wrong lol
2019-07-18 05:24
#67
 | 
Macau Bent0 
its annoying to get used to the new perspective or looks of it I started playing csgo with 1600x900 because apex used it before then I switch to 4:3 and I can't go back to 16:9 or 16:10 anymore everything feels weird similar to switching from 144hz to 60hz
2019-07-18 05:24
Because on 1080p the models look too slim for me to shoot . 1024x768 best res .
2019-07-18 05:33
#82
flusha | 
Ukraine Cormack 
Cuz the heads bigger at 4:3 if the head 90megapixel at 16:9, 110-120megapixel at 4:3
2019-07-18 17:43
terrible fps
2019-07-18 17:52
High res means more detailed textures and this thing tires my eyes, same goes for low resolutions as well, so medium quality resolutions like 1280x960 r best for me. /close
2019-07-18 17:57
#100
 | 
United States Troglxdyte 
This is the most retarded post I've seen on hltv this week. Good job
2019-07-19 04:09
I shared my personal experience. On 1080p everything looks so sharp which causes my eyes hurt. There is nothing retarded about it. "so medium quality resolutions like 1280x960 r best for me." Learn to respect people's opinions.
2019-07-19 10:48
#153
 | 
United States Troglxdyte 
it is clearly not because its "too sharp" you dinglebery. its because youre used to 1280x960. if you used 1920 for awhile, it would no longer look "too sharp", it would look "normal". do you not believe me? it is so simple and easily understandable. how could you be so stupid?
2019-07-19 22:54
Dude are you mentally retarded? Do you have problems in your head? Cant you just communicate without insults? It is not like i give a fuck but chill the fuck out, big boy. Does your daddy beat you everyday? Is that the reason you are so offensive? For one last time and all, imma try to make it clearer. Take a wall's texture as an example. On lower resolutions it might not be so easy to see details (like writings, cracks, lines on the wall) so when the wall appears on your screen your eyes cant see the details and skip it most of the time and thus you can concentrate on your enemies better. Less things to concentrate/see, less things for your eyes and brain to process, get it? On higher resolutions that writings, cracks etc. on the wall are more detailed/visible/clearer to see hence your eyes see it (even though you didnt really look at it) and try to process it. Why do i even try to reply a prick like you? And if i get banned because of those i wont give a fuck. U dumb motherfucker.
2019-07-19 23:30
#156
 | 
United States Troglxdyte 
I could easily debunk this and anybody with a brain reading this would realize you're baiting. Not going to waste anymore time responding to your trolls "masterbaiter900"
2019-07-20 03:30
#87
b0RUP | 
Denmark Gryde 
feels better i guess
2019-07-18 18:02
4:3 Stretched 1024x768 sometimes 800x600. i9-9900k RTX 2080Ti 32gb Are no best res, if you say fov, people with 4:3 should know when they can be seen from angels or need to check corners different from you, but we always check with 4:3 so we know how, this is really info for you that use 16:9. Whatever floats your boat!
2019-07-18 18:05
#93
 | 
United States xxpowmanxx 
Ppl play what they are used to tbh, its all pref there really isnt a best.
2019-07-19 04:01
#98
 | 
Brazil Guccipradas 
High resolution head's character looks smaller.
2019-07-19 04:07
#101
 | 
United States Troglxdyte 
You mean non-stretched. Higher res alone doesn't make the heads smaller.
2019-07-19 04:11
#103
 | 
Brazil Guccipradas 
Higher res can't be stretched can be?
2019-07-19 04:14
#106
 | 
United States Troglxdyte 
Higher res isn't only 1920. Theres 1680x1050, and 1440x1080 as well. And they can be stretched.
2019-07-19 04:15
#108
 | 
Brazil Guccipradas 
i don't know that, nice
2019-07-19 04:18
#105
 | 
Czech Republic g0thb0i 
1. FPS 2. Playing CS since 2011
2019-07-19 04:15
1280x1024 5:4 only 5:4 that's in the game I'm pretty sure.
2019-07-19 04:21
#113
 | 
Portugal TecN 
4:3 FTW
2019-07-19 04:25
#115
 | 
Brazil goatzera 
+1 mens))) 1920x1080 here
2019-07-19 04:50
imagine playing on 16:9 and you're infront of sandwich your crosshair is holding jungle and you see a player peek you on your left which is default there is no way you can react and win that duel. its all about how smart you position yourself and your crosshair placement, if youre smart you will never position yourself in multiple angle. thats why pro dont really care playing on 4:3 and low sens cause they are smart with their positioning and crosshair placement im pretty sure they are used to it so they dont want to fucked up their muscle memory too. you can be good with any settings when you are used to it.
2019-07-19 04:56
#119
s1mple | 
Czech Republic Lo0u_ 
Well, I play at 1024x768 black bars on a 29.5" 200Hz monitor. Only because it's CS, otherwise I'd play at full resolution, like I do with every other game. It's just preference, there's no reason to care about it.
2019-07-19 05:05
tried 1920x1080 for ages cant spray for shit with that res switched back to 4:3 stretched everything back to normal , u tell me
2019-07-19 05:15
For me it is just a habit from playing older CS games.
2019-07-19 05:27
#125
NiKo | 
Vietnam DucM4nh 
am i the only one who use 640x480
2019-07-19 09:36
I used to play at 640x480 in CS 1.6 for years and it's my favorite res for sure, but it looks awful in CS:GO. Do you use LOD settings to make it sharper or any other tweaks to improve image quality?
2019-07-19 10:52
#127
sLowi | 
Finland tonzi 
Does FPS even matter that much in csgo? In my opinion 144 FPS looks like the same as 300 FPS.
2019-07-19 10:49
Yes it does , I have 120 -200 fps on 144hz and if I play on 300fps it looks far more smoother .
2019-07-19 10:50
More fps = better frame time.
2019-07-19 10:53
#131
 | 
Italy Fil0Nerd 
+1 lmao people are dumb
2019-07-19 10:54
1920x1080 = - HD - Beautiful - Perfect vision on the sides - Slower game, strafe are "less violent", for example take an ECO rush in 1920x1080 is easier than in 4: 3 or the characters are faster. - No difference in FPS, when you have a good processor, whether you are in 16: 9 or 4: 3, there will be no difference in FPS, I look in the net_graph 1 and these are the same FPS, you have may be the impression that it consumes less but it's not the case, it's just that it's faster because there are fewer pixels to browse, that's all. - perfect res for awp 4:3 = - Because most noobs want to do like the pros while they play in these low resolutions only out of habit - Silver/LEM
2019-07-19 11:08
#133
refrezh | 
Ukraine iqbot 
I don’t want to argue with someone, but for me 4:3 is just a comfortable res.
2019-07-19 11:07
The 4:3 is ugly so anything but comfortable The game is by default at 1920x1080, you lowered this resolution to do like the pro like the noob you are, don't lie to yourself)))
2019-07-19 11:10
#136
refrezh | 
Ukraine iqbot 
Nope, I didn’t. I even tried the 1920x1080. That looks really better, but everything is so small, like a table game. So, I enjoy playing 4:3:) That’s just my taste)
2019-07-19 11:12
16:9 1920x1080 master race It is like that, mens)))
2019-07-19 11:07
#137
Twistzz | 
Finland ggega 
i have been playing at 1920x1080 for 3 years now its alright faceit avg hs ratio across 1000 matches 57%
2019-07-19 11:13
1680x1050>all
2019-07-19 11:16
1080p in 2019 omegalul
2019-07-19 11:17
75 hz
2019-07-19 14:01
unless u have been playing cs since 1504 u have no reason to use 4:3, its just worse only positive is more fps
2019-07-19 14:05
#145
 | 
United Kingdom EzGamingTv 
you can make your res streched if you are on 4:3 or 16:10 res which can make aiming for the head easier.
2019-07-19 14:06
#148
NAF | 
Europe aches 
ppl use lower res either by being fans of players or being used to it or just for better fps due to shit pc's i use 16:9 because im a real gamer chad :sunglasses:
2019-07-19 17:33
lower res is better for those with poorer eyesight and it feels easier to aim on (mentally) it also brings higher FPS its also less diorienting, 1920 X 1080 feels like High FOV Minecraft
2019-07-19 18:07
#151
 | 
Brazil trevz 
lower resolution = less details on screen, it's more easy to focus on enemy. it's not because the fps.
2019-07-19 18:12
#154
Snax | 
Poland JayEmKay 
game is smoother
2019-07-19 22:57
low res = big hitbox
2019-07-20 03:33
#160
 | 
Latvia Aleksib0b 
One taps
2019-08-05 12:18
#163
saju | 
Poland PanArek 
I would play full hd but on 4:3 i have more HZ
2019-08-05 12:21
#164
 | 
Netherlands NELK 
4:3 > 5:4 > 16:10 > 16:9
2019-08-05 12:22
nt gold nova
2019-08-05 12:22
#169
 | 
Netherlands NELK 
Nt I'm unranked
2019-08-05 12:29
#168
rain | 
France HYPNO5 
+1
2019-08-05 12:27
enemies are bigger, easier to kill 1280x960
2019-08-05 12:26
#167
rain | 
France HYPNO5 
im better this low res , as simple as that
2019-08-05 12:26
#170
 | 
Portugal xxxRUI75xxx 
I began playing CSGO 2 years and a half ago and I´ve used 1080p since the beginning. I´ve tried lower graphic settings/resolutions which some "pros" use to give it a try but everything looks blurrier and more pixelated and was not a fan. I also didn´t feel that my performance was better with those other settings/resolutions. PC performance is not a problem because I have a high end pc and therefore my fps never go lower than 250 fps (I get around 300-400 fps on average). I am comfortable playing at 1080p. That´s what matters to me. YMMV.
2019-08-05 12:37
i dunno i noticed that 4/3 streched has better feel to it cause its faster and 4/3 bb even if i run same fps on 16/9 feels alot smoother like if you compare YouTube 60 fps videos to simple videos
2019-08-05 12:42
personally I use 16:9 but at 1280x720p, I prefer how my crosshair looks at 720p
2019-08-06 04:12
Rating-o-meter
NEXT MATCH
0.77
Help GTR perform and have a chance to win a package for your team
Boost his rating with
Runtime Nutrition
20% on everything at
Click here to have a chance to win
BOOST
BOOST
BOOST
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.