Thread has been deleted
Last comment
8:2(2+2)=
Poland JaskeN_ 
Solve the equation in the title mens))
2019-08-02 13:08
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
what the fuck is :
2019-08-02 13:09
97 replies
#5
 | 
Poland EZFOREZ
its like /
2019-08-02 13:10
60 replies
#591
 | 
Germany hatrez
Answer is 16: 8 : 2 * (2 + 2) = 8 : 2 * 4 In math you solve from left to right. So you devide 8 by 2 then multiply it by 4 which is 16.
2019-08-04 02:19
58 replies
16/2. (2+2) -= 16 bye noob
2019-08-04 02:40
No you dont solve from left to right in maths. You solve from what is within it. You always do ( ) first then Multipli and Divide next. Then + and - and such. Meaning you can just aswell start from the right to left as you can from left to right. How do you not know this?
2019-08-04 11:48
56 replies
Sry but you are wrong. Sure u do ( 2+2) first.. Than it comes down to multiplication and division. Theres no rule which one has a higher priority so you start from left to right not right to left.
2019-08-04 11:50
54 replies
#625
 | 
United Kingdom alcaz4r_
lmao
2019-08-04 11:52
26 replies
Lmao?
2019-08-04 11:53
25 replies
#629
 | 
United Kingdom alcaz4r_
bidmas?
2019-08-04 11:58
24 replies
Yes
2019-08-04 12:00
22 replies
#633
 | 
United Kingdom alcaz4r_
Brackets Indices Division Multiplication Addition Subtraction Men I still remember it so smart
2019-08-04 12:15
21 replies
Yeah but Division and Multiplication: Starting from the left, work these out in the order that they appear in the equation. If multiplication appears first you should complete this before division.
2019-08-04 12:18
20 replies
#635
 | 
United Kingdom alcaz4r_
Jesus Christ no you always do division first wtf kinda shithole country are you from that you didn't do maths in primary school wtf??
2019-08-04 12:22
19 replies
0/8
2019-08-04 12:24
5 replies
#639
 | 
United Kingdom alcaz4r_
Didn't realise Norway used exclusively 3rd worlder teachers
2019-08-04 12:25
4 replies
0/8
2019-08-04 12:44
3 replies
#653
 | 
United Kingdom alcaz4r_
Bidmas
2019-08-04 14:08
2 replies
Google it
2019-08-04 14:21
1 reply
#690
 | 
United Kingdom alcaz4r_
lmao I study maths I don't need to Google it
2019-08-04 17:22
2019-08-04 15:50
2 replies
#691
 | 
United Kingdom alcaz4r_
Doesn't mean I'm wrong
2019-08-04 17:22
1 reply
bruh
2019-08-04 18:01
Not sure if trolling or stupid. Mr Norway is correct of course.
2019-08-04 19:50
1 reply
+1
2019-08-04 19:56
#712
 | 
United States YEP_COCK
no theres no priority in division or multiplication. In us we call is PEMDAS (parenthesis, exponents, multiplication, division, addition, subtraction)
2019-08-04 20:02
7 replies
#718
 | 
United Kingdom alcaz4r_
It's the same thing anyway but you don't do it left to right regardless
2019-08-04 20:58
6 replies
#723
 | 
United States YEP_COCK
no you do dumbass
2019-08-04 21:34
5 replies
#724
 | 
United Kingdom alcaz4r_
You wouldn't do it left to right, you should do it in a way that is most convenient, ie anything that can be cancelled out etc. not just left to right always.
2019-08-04 21:37
4 replies
#726
 | 
United States YEP_COCK
british math
2019-08-04 23:06
The problem rewritten is (8/2)*(2+2)
2019-08-07 22:53
2 replies
#742
 | 
United Kingdom alcaz4r_
You would do 8/2 first there lmao
2019-08-08 08:02
1 reply
yes, just like you are in the original problem
2019-08-08 16:59
BODMAS - Brackets of Division, Multiplication, Addition, Subtraction It works as: 1. Brackets 2. Division or Multiplication 3. Addition or Subtraction BODMAS sounds way BOMDAS or BODMSA In your case, BIDMAS sounds way better as an acronym than BIMDAS or BIDMSA
2019-08-05 12:48
just use calculator mens B)
2019-08-04 12:02
1 reply
Yes. Answer is 16 Don't need a calculator for something this simple
2019-08-04 12:07
Bro, you are stupid, yes there are prioritys within Maths... Google it bro.
2019-08-04 13:29
10 replies
Google it
2019-08-04 14:40
9 replies
google.com/search?client=avg&q=math+prio.. There you go, now stfu you are still wrong. Go to school
2019-08-04 15:34
8 replies
Just shorten the story, answer is 16 and life goes on
2019-08-04 15:51
#677
 | 
Germany hatrez
Bro you retarded. It cleary says first simplify what is inside the parentheses then exponents then multiply and devision from left to right. Leave this planet please
2019-08-04 16:20
5 replies
Are you retarded? Read the conversation dumbass... Im proving that there are Priorities within Math you moron. Not that you have to simplify. Ofcourse you have to simplify. Thats the basics of during parentheses.... Freaking hell.
2019-08-04 16:22
3 replies
#684
 | 
Germany hatrez
I just stated that you damn gaymark idiot.
2019-08-04 16:23
He agreed that there are priorities, but NOT between multiplication and division as you incorrectly claimed. Which your link also clearly states. Read before you get mad.
2019-08-04 19:53
You're wrong, stop arguing, you only make yourself look stupid.
2019-08-04 19:57
What you forget is that there is a multiplication sign between the 2 outside the bracket and the stuff within the bracket
2019-08-05 12:49
u are retarded
2019-08-04 18:01
#norwayeducation
2019-08-04 14:11
12 replies
Google it
2019-08-04 14:40
5 replies
google.com/search?client=avg&q=math+prio.. There you go, now stfu you are still wrong. Go to school
2019-08-04 15:34
4 replies
Yes kid. But it comes down to multiplication and division. None of these 2 have the higher priority. So you do left to right. Denmark education LUL
2019-08-04 15:55
3 replies
hahAHAHAHAHAHAHA, you just got yeeted by me and then you make up some random shit i already knew and said hahaa. Ofcourse Multiplication and Division is the same hahahaa. But you didnt know there was orders hahahaha. Get fucked kiddo
2019-08-04 16:20
2 replies
#680
 | 
Germany hatrez
You should a dick to celebrate.
2019-08-04 16:21
Read the first few comments again and rethink your whole life
2019-08-04 16:24
+1 They are retarded. Most retarded Northern Country.
2019-08-04 15:33
5 replies
Madmark speaking LUL
2019-08-04 15:53
4 replies
Noway talking xD, dumb kids dumb adults.
2019-08-04 16:21
3 replies
Noway mens))))
2019-08-04 16:21
2 replies
haha mens
2019-08-04 16:23
1 reply
yes Jonas)))))
2019-08-04 16:23
+1 /close
2019-08-04 19:58
You just described what he did in the first place stop consuming shrooms
2019-08-05 13:21
It's called The Division by Tom Clancy
2019-08-04 11:18
Its dividing
2019-08-02 13:11
Fakin americana noob ":' = "/" Dividing
2019-08-02 13:12
7 replies
TEACH THEM MY SLAV BROTHER
2019-08-02 13:25
1 reply
+1
2019-08-02 18:57
dumb polak thinks he is ”smart” because he uses quotation mark LUL
2019-08-02 18:57
4 replies
Reply needs to have actual content.
2019-08-02 20:31
2 replies
true he could've just said dumb polak
2019-08-03 20:09
1 reply
#626
 | 
United Kingdom alcaz4r_
xaxaxa
2019-08-04 11:52
burger spotted
2019-08-03 20:00
is obviously 1 you kids have no clue how to do math
2019-08-02 13:14
12 replies
+1
2019-08-02 18:28
+1, Basic algebra
2019-08-02 19:36
it's 16 u noob
2019-08-02 19:42
6 replies
r/wooosh ._.
2019-08-03 06:43
4 replies
hsooow/r
2019-08-03 19:59
1 reply
wooosh/r
2019-08-04 02:14
nt redditFag
2019-08-04 11:49
1 reply
rwoowshs
2019-08-07 22:46
#588
 | 
Germany hatrez
Right answer
2019-08-04 02:15
+1
2019-08-03 19:55
#605
 | 
France NeaZy
+1
2019-08-04 10:59
nt
2019-08-04 18:02
#85
 | 
World NukestrikE
Na education LMAO
2019-08-02 13:31
8 replies
fuck bro we actually dumb as fuck we only ever use \
2019-08-02 15:47
7 replies
You mean "/" xaxaxaxaxaaxaxa 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
2019-08-02 16:53
4 replies
Lmao
2019-08-02 17:34
BRUH my iq just went below zero
2019-08-02 18:31
#479
 | 
Russia Roneeee
OMEGALUL
2019-08-02 22:23
+1 axaxaxa
2019-08-03 20:09
#628
 | 
United Kingdom alcaz4r_
Everyone uses /, : is used for ratios so you really shouldn't use :
2019-08-04 11:54
1 reply
i know you’re just trying to make me feel better, dad.
2019-08-04 14:38
HAHAHA American HAHAHAH Sorry i don't count time by measuring feet per hamburger.
2019-08-02 13:45
2 replies
There is 1382 hamburgers in 863 feet so the time is 54:92 A.M right now
2019-08-02 15:40
1 reply
4:20 time to blaze mens)))
2019-08-02 18:06
#400
 | 
Brazil hrp__
proportion
2019-08-02 18:50
16/2. (2+2) -= 16 bye noob
2019-08-04 02:40
#2
 | 
Poland EZFOREZ
1
2019-08-02 13:09
18 replies
+1
2019-08-02 13:37
16 replies
8 : 2 * (2 + 2) = 16 but 8 : (2 * (2 + 2)) = 1
2019-08-02 13:56
14 replies
very nice mens))
2019-08-02 14:37
u kdding me? it's a fcking fraction 8 at the numerator 2(2+2) at the denominator = fcking 1
2019-08-02 15:47
10 replies
+1 correct without the fcking
2019-08-02 15:52
#300
 | 
CIS kryto203
Its not fraction, its division :. You cant write fractions in one line without brackets or special symbols. Maybe use / to show fraction (debatable) but in this case theres : so no chance this is a fraction
2019-08-02 17:09
5 replies
+999 Also, don't argue with us about math. ex-USSR countries even better in math than India, my german friend
2019-08-02 18:41
2 replies
India good at maths. Are you fucking joking or what?/ China numba one then is US because of slaves they bring from China and other countries, third is Canada for the same reason. Then comes ex-USSR, then Europe....etc India will be like 50. These are Math olympiad 2019 stats. Out of 6 members US and Canada had like 4,4 chinese immigrants. China was ranked 1 and US was 2.
2019-08-03 20:08
Who gave you 0 B/
2019-08-04 12:21
he meant its division which is basically just fractions, and its 8/8 which is 1, but in reality the answer is 16 and it is not a fraction edit: i basically said what you already knew but was trying to explain his retardation edit 2: this equation is stupid because in NA : is / which is division and fraction so if the equation was written on paper with the proper symbol he would understand it better
2019-08-02 23:54
1 reply
+1
2019-08-03 16:09
#436
 | 
Germany nobodyCS
8/2*(2+2) = 8/2*(4) = 4*4 = 16 Imagine you have a linear function f(x):=8/2*x, f(x) can also be written as 4*x but not 8/(2*x), that’s completely different
2019-08-02 19:08
1 reply
#494
 | 
Lithuania Vaiter3
+1
2019-08-02 22:40
#437
 | 
United States YEP_COCK
pemdas my brother
2019-08-02 19:08
go back to school
2019-08-02 17:42
actually its 8\2*2+2 = 8\6 = 1.33
2019-08-02 17:51
+1
2019-08-03 19:57
W R O N G
2019-08-02 18:43
16
2019-08-02 13:10
16 cuz scientist mens said that)))
2019-08-02 13:10
1
2019-08-02 13:10
2 replies
Wtf
2019-08-02 13:38
It's 16 my man
2019-08-02 15:03
16
2019-08-02 13:10
eleven men))
2019-08-02 13:10
16 ofc
2019-08-02 13:11
1 reply
=D
2019-08-02 14:22
the answer is 1 men))
2019-08-02 13:11
12 replies
+1
2019-08-02 13:12
#21
 | 
Poland EZFOREZ
exacly
2019-08-02 13:12
nt, pemdASS
2019-08-02 13:14
7 replies
bruh if you believe that the answer is 16 then u dunno how to do a simple math question
2019-08-02 13:16
6 replies
Bruh, kindergarden kid
2019-08-02 13:19
#63
 | 
Cyprus Swishh_
0/8 tbh
2019-08-02 13:22
#67
 | 
Germany ppgod_
0/8
2019-08-02 13:23
#84
 | 
Europe obvious
0/8
2019-08-02 13:31
0/8
2019-08-02 18:05
bruh
2019-08-02 22:38
Nt
2019-08-03 01:52
bruh
2019-08-04 18:04
it's not an equation
2019-08-02 13:11
2 replies
do you see that "=" sign there? that = means equals, so yes it is an equation <(((-_-)))>
2019-08-02 14:54
1 reply
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation "In mathematics, an equation is a statement that asserts the equality of two expressions" If medias are calling this expression "an equation", it doesn't mean they are right
2019-08-03 17:24
#14
 | 
CIS Akahuru
1.6
2019-08-02 13:11
3 replies
Neo ez mens))
2019-08-02 13:12
2 replies
nt it was f0rest
2019-08-02 13:26
1 reply
markeloff 2010
2019-08-02 13:48
+1
2019-08-02 13:12
16
2019-08-02 13:13
#25
NEO | 
Italy Wakkaa
altho I love maths.. I still don't know in what kind of daily occupation you need to know these things
2019-08-02 13:14
12 replies
#52
 | 
Cyprus shmoe
like today, when you opened this thread.
2019-08-02 13:20
2 replies
#56
NEO | 
Italy Wakkaa
occupation*
2019-08-02 13:21
1 reply
#61
 | 
Cyprus shmoe
my bad. you are right. how stupid of me.
2019-08-02 13:21
Imagine you didn't know basic maffs bro Ofc u can do everything with a calculator but you would be so fucking stupid in all other areas of life. Remember: If in other sciences we should arrive at certainty without doubt, it behooves us to place the foundations of knowledge in mathematics.
2019-08-02 14:39
8 replies
#227
NEO | 
Italy Wakkaa
Maths comes easy for me. I have just never had to apply any of this at work. Especially since excel does all the work for you. ;>
2019-08-02 14:42
7 replies
Yeah but imagine you had just quit maffs after second grade or whatever this crap is. You'd be half the person ur today.
2019-08-02 14:45
6 replies
#230
NEO | 
Italy Wakkaa
not sure about that lol. If i take into consideration how much bs I got taught there. Especially about calculating angles and all that I never had to apply :-D
2019-08-02 14:45
5 replies
Yeah but it schools ur brain in more ways than one. Ppl always say meeeh never needed 3/4 of the crap I learned in school but they forget they'd be dumb as shit had they not learned this crap.
2019-08-02 14:48
1 reply
#239
NEO | 
Italy Wakkaa
I suppose so. at the end of the day knowledge is power.
2019-08-02 14:54
mathematics teach you how to use brain, you don't need to directly use stuff from classes irl it's like with gym, will you need to lift 150kg while lying on the ground in normal life?????? no, but it surely makes you stronger healthier and more confident overall math is the same but for brain, trust me if you never learned math in your life you'd have 40 IQ less
2019-08-02 16:01
2 replies
This
2019-08-02 16:48
#545
 | 
Canada zizzle21
no iq is realizing you dont need to learn math because you can use calculator.
2019-08-03 07:44
1
2019-08-02 13:15
2 replies
dumbo
2019-08-03 05:46
1 reply
0/8
2019-08-03 09:04
1
2019-08-02 13:16
8:2(2+2) 8:2(4) 8:8 1
2019-08-02 13:16
18 replies
#54
 | 
Finland IFK
Nah, after (2+2) there won’t be (4), it’s just 8:2*4=
2019-08-02 13:20
15 replies
doesnt matter lmao
2019-08-02 13:23
14 replies
are you retarded?
2019-08-02 13:27
13 replies
no
2019-08-02 13:30
12 replies
ok
2019-08-02 13:40
11 replies
tell me why am I wrong?
2019-08-02 13:45
1 reply
You're not wrong.
2019-08-02 13:48
I see LMAO I am retarded
2019-08-02 13:47
8 replies
I don't know if you see something I don't but you're right.
2019-08-02 13:50
7 replies
8:2(4) 8:2*4 is no difference but I failed something else
2019-08-02 13:53
6 replies
but what
2019-08-02 13:54
1 reply
who knows 😎 its too dumb xDD
2019-08-02 13:54
8:2*4 first u take 8:2 = 4 then you take 4*4 = 16
2019-08-02 14:05
3 replies
2019-08-02 14:44
2 replies
hahah wtf
2019-08-03 20:15
nt 1917 nibba
2019-08-04 18:06
You calculate whats between the brackets first then do the maths in order, from left to right 8:2(2+2)=8:2*4=4*4=16
2019-08-02 13:41
1 reply
Gj
2019-08-02 14:41
1
2019-08-02 13:17
#43
 | 
World ZMDR
69
2019-08-02 13:18
16 or 1, depends on which way you count. This writing is bad, correct in maths but ambiguous...
2019-08-02 13:19
11 replies
There is only one true result in sciences subjects Its 16
2019-08-02 13:20
7 replies
Actually no but you're right here. I badly expressed myself. I never intended to say "there is 2 results here, 1 and 16" but I wanted to say "The debate between 1 and 16 is caused by the ambigious writing of this expression". Of course I went to school i know it's 16 but the linear writing like this can make the whole equation really hard to read and thus to solve.
2019-08-02 13:26
6 replies
Only in 1 situation you can have result like one in this equation: 8:[2(2+2)] Then the anwser is 1 Otherwise its 16 and imo how you write it doesnt really matter because there is only 1 anwser
2019-08-02 13:46
5 replies
Tru
2019-08-02 14:41
Or 2(2+2):8
2019-08-02 15:08
Not necessarily, the ":" symbol denotes a ratio/division. 8:2(2+2) can be read as a fraction with a numerator of 8 and a denominator of 2(2+2) which would return an answer of 1.
2019-08-02 18:11
2 replies
Yes, it could but I stated waay up there that ":" means dividing in that equation.
2019-08-02 20:29
Yes but that would meamit was 8/(2(4)
2019-08-03 01:54
its always 16 lol 8:2 is same like 8/2 so you gonna always convert that to 4 before you gonna do anything with it
2019-08-02 13:22
2 replies
2019-08-02 14:50
1 reply
hhaahahha
2019-08-03 20:18
16 wtf
2019-08-02 13:20
16 why is this even debatable? ppl skip math since they are 10 y/o or what the fuck?
2019-08-02 13:20
5 replies
Yes norway guy, they fucking do xD
2019-08-02 13:21
1 reply
well that's just idiotic in a world that will have robots replace lowIQ jobs
2019-08-02 13:22
look at the replies and wonder, plenty of people saying it's 1
2019-08-02 13:30
2 replies
??? it's basic math that you learn with 10 normally
2019-08-02 13:32
1 reply
yes.
2019-08-02 14:10
16.
2019-08-02 13:20
31 maybe?
2019-08-02 13:21
1 reply
They do not know what 31 means.
2019-08-02 13:25
#59
 | 
Russia Lovely_VI
228
2019-08-02 13:21
1.6 Noobs <3 ez for PashaBiceps GO VP GO VP! <3
2019-08-02 13:23
153 . 353 . 654 , 099
2019-08-02 13:23
16 or 1. You cant even write a equation
2019-08-02 13:32
6 replies
you cant even right in english
2019-08-02 13:28
2 replies
What?
2019-08-02 13:35
1 reply
nice edit
2019-08-02 13:36
(8/2) . (2+2) = 4 . 4 = 16 [8/2(2+2)] 4/(2+2) = 1
2019-08-02 13:32
2 replies
you cant ignore the brackets tho. the things in brackets always go first
2019-08-02 13:37
#119
 | 
Cyprus Swishh_
the equation he wrote is the first one, the second is different
2019-08-02 13:49
Answer is 16. Just trust me i have 127 iq
2019-08-02 13:25
+11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
2019-08-02 13:25
7
2019-08-02 13:27
It is 16 because 8/2 *4 32/2 Pm me if I'm wrong
2019-08-02 13:32
4 replies
#91
 | 
Europe obvious
It is 16 but the way you solve it is autistic
2019-08-02 13:34
1 reply
ahahhaa n1
2019-08-02 14:39
you are wrong af even if you got the correct answer the way you solve is wrong af wtf
2019-08-02 14:40
1 reply
it is not wrong, look: a/b * c = ac/b in this example a = 8, b = 2, c= 4
2019-08-02 15:13
#89
 | 
Europe obvious
Can't believe some ppl think it's 1. Such an easy equation
2019-08-02 13:33
Everyone agrees on 8:2*4 You should do it from left to right, that's the rule. So: 8:2*4=4*4=16
2019-08-02 13:34
16 ez
2019-08-02 13:35
16
2019-08-02 13:36
If you don't get 16 go back to school
2019-08-02 13:38
16
2019-08-02 13:39
4x4=16 easy
2019-08-02 13:42
16
2019-08-02 13:43
Seriously, where the fuck do you people live to have such shitty education? You learn that shit when ur like literally 10.
2019-08-02 13:47
#113
 | 
United Kingdom aight_bet
so many fucking retarded cunts here. it's not written as 8/2*(2+2) it's written as 8/2(2+2) THE 2 IS LINKED TO THE PARANTHESIS FUCKING RETARDED CUNTS JESUS FUCKING CHIRST YOU GUYS SHOULD HONESTLY JUST COMMIT.
2019-08-02 13:47
8 replies
Actually, the multiplication sine is "not visible here", but its there Example: 2(4+2)=2x6=12 11-7(5-3)=11-7x2=11-14=-3 etc
2019-08-02 13:55
#152
 | 
Australia opzy
no, that isn't a thing, 2(2+2) is an implied multiply, which is the exact fucking same as 2x(2+2) bro
2019-08-02 14:00
4 replies
#155
 | 
United Kingdom aight_bet
no you can't calculate 2(2+2) lmao. how can you calculate something that doesn't exist
2019-08-02 14:01
3 replies
x=(2+2) then it's 2x. There you go.
2019-08-02 14:17
1 reply
#187
 | 
United Kingdom aight_bet
Woah wtf is this magic.
2019-08-02 14:17
#247
 | 
Europe obvious
0/8 Idk how you even managed to bait someone with that shit
2019-08-02 15:09
1 reply
#338
 | 
United Kingdom aight_bet
idk either.
2019-08-02 18:31
Obviously it's 1. People are dumb nowadays.
2019-08-02 13:48
2 replies
#595
 | 
Germany hatrez
You are right bro continue with your life how you used to it. You are so smart. You are gonna be a popular scientist
2019-08-04 02:28
1 reply
Well, why not? I could be a really good one.
2019-08-05 12:35
8/2(2+2) 8/8 1 2 is linked with parenthesis
2019-08-02 13:53
6 replies
spain math 🤣
2019-08-02 13:52
1 reply
fixed
2019-08-02 13:54
wtf but nice name
2019-08-02 13:53
3 replies
fixed
2019-08-02 13:53
2 replies
nice men
2019-08-02 13:54
1 reply
Green i very smart
2019-08-02 13:54
16 if anyone else got anything else drink bleach
2019-08-02 13:51
1.6 Noobs <3 ez for PashaBiceps GO VP GO VP! <3!!!
2019-08-02 13:52
are you guys like retarded? It's 1 --> 8:2(2+2) You have to calculate the brackets first --> 8/2(4) If you put the "4" out of the brackets the result is in the end 16 but you have to leave the "4" in the brackets because why would you "delete" the brackets(sry for bad england). Then 2*(4) bcuz brackets always first. --> 8/8 8 divided by 8 is obviously 1 --> 1 Here you have it mens))
2019-08-02 13:52
46 replies
wtf dude its so simple why u get it wrong 8:2(2+2)= 8:2 = 4 4(2+2) 4(4) 16
2019-08-02 13:54
24 replies
you have to calculate the brackets first
2019-08-02 13:55
23 replies
it doesnt matter it doesnt change my result, you do whats IN the brackets then you do 8:2, then x that by whatever is in brackets
2019-08-02 13:56
22 replies
look at my calculation its 100% right
2019-08-02 13:56
10 replies
read my edit
2019-08-02 13:56
4 replies
but in the second step you cant divide 8 by 2 you have to multiply 2*(4) bcuz the 4 is still in the bracket
2019-08-02 13:58
3 replies
U fuking retard 2*4 is the same shit as 2*(4) But ill take the L for getting baited but i think many autistic NA brains think that
2019-08-02 15:55
2 replies
it may be the same. But the start exercise has 2(2+2) and not 2*(2+2) What would be more correct cuz you use at 2+2 brackets cuz it is necessary you don't use bracket to don't use the * this is only a sideffect.
2019-08-02 18:18
1 reply
2(2+2) and 2*(2+2) are the same
2019-08-02 22:52
also if u genuinely think it's 1 please dont reply to me anymore, you subhuman
2019-08-02 13:57
4 replies
AU education
2019-08-02 13:58
3 replies
well because u replied to me that must mean you dont think its 1, you think its 16 now. congrats 😎
2019-08-02 13:59
2 replies
damn you played me 😎
2019-08-02 13:59
#165
 | 
Cyprus Swishh_
outsmarted 😎😎
2019-08-02 14:05
+1 you do equation IN THE BRACKETS then it leaves us 8:2(2+2) 8:2x4 4x4=16 Simple as that
2019-08-02 14:00
10 replies
L2M, 8/2(2+2) 8/4+4 8/8 1
2019-08-02 14:30
9 replies
Ok xD So how is your "4+4" before "8/4"? And also did you just multiply one number in the bracket but not the other one? WTF
2019-08-02 14:33
8 replies
i.imgur.com/pCZIUbX.jpg wtf dude your brains l2m
2019-08-02 14:35
7 replies
imgur.com/a/Qmgytbj Your calculator is calculating this as 8/[2x(2+2)] Like this: 8 8 8 2x(2+2) = 2x4 = 8 = 1 *8/2x(2+2) then 8/2x4 then 8/8 =1* Which is wrong
2019-08-02 14:39
6 replies
So your trustin basic internet caculator over TI NSPIRE CAS CX??? Do you even math?
2019-08-02 14:41
5 replies
Yes, but you don't As I said, your calculator is calculating 8/[2(2+2)] not 8/2(2+2) And 8/[2(2+2)] =/= 8/2(2+2) Thats it
2019-08-02 14:42
4 replies
"Historically the symbol ÷ was used to mean you should divide by the entire product on the right of the symbol." poor me =(
2019-08-02 14:46
3 replies
Remember friend, admitting a mistake is not a failure, but a sign of maturity and enlightenment))
2019-08-02 14:49
2 replies
MY WHOLE LIFE IS A LIE!
2019-08-02 14:50
1 reply
#249
 | 
Europe obvious
l2m
2019-08-02 15:11
You are using outdated methods. PEMDAS mate. 8:2(2+2) = 8:2(4) = 4(4) = 4*4 = 16
2019-08-02 14:02
19 replies
Bro in the second you mustn't divide 8 by 2 you have to multiply 2 by 4 bcuz 4 is still in the brackets
2019-08-02 14:04
18 replies
Huh? If you have both division and multiplication in a math problem, you solve it from left to right. And since 8:2 is before the (4) you solve it first.
2019-08-02 14:09
6 replies
but the "4" is still in the brackets and brackets are always first
2019-08-02 14:18
5 replies
(4) = 4 mate.
2019-08-02 14:18
4 replies
no thats the mistake you and many others make, you cant just put the 4 out of the brackets that makes the equation wrong
2019-08-02 14:20
3 replies
No, What you are solving is 8:(2*4) which is 1. Brackets DO come first but you solve what's INSIDE of the brackets. And if (4) isn't 4 then what is it?
2019-08-02 14:22
name doesnt check out
2019-08-04 16:28
wtf dude 4 is 4 brackets go away when the actions in it are completed
2019-08-04 16:51
#250
 | 
Europe obvious
You don't have a bracket anymore, because you already solved it. (2+2) = 4 You can write it as (4) to not get confused but it won't change anything. You are really just making a clown out of yourself, your math teacher wouldn't be happy.
2019-08-02 15:13
10 replies
you write (4) cuz there is no * and without * the bracket has to finish first before you calculate.
2019-08-02 18:13
9 replies
#321
 | 
Europe obvious
the answer is 16, not even sure what you are trying to say
2019-08-02 18:16
8 replies
the start exercise has 2(2+2) and not 2*(2+2) What would be more correct? you use at 2+2 brackets cuz it is necessary you don't use brackets to don't use the * this is only a side effect You took a bullshit way by editing the exercise.
2019-08-02 18:20
7 replies
#325
 | 
Europe obvious
2(2+2) = 2*(2+2) did you even go to school?
2019-08-02 18:20
6 replies
did u actually read what I wrote? The consequence is when u calculate (2+2) is that it stays (4) and not *4 Because if the exercise want to be 16 it does 2*(2+2) When you change that during the calculation you edit the exercise even when it basically equal. But "equal" isn't the "same" I dunno if in English there is a meaning difference between "equal" and "same" but in german it is. It has to be the same not equal.
2019-08-02 18:25
5 replies
#330
 | 
Europe obvious
No, (4) and 4 is the same thing
2019-08-02 18:26
4 replies
you actually said it is equally not the same #325 and you still change the excercise when you change that during the calculation
2019-08-02 18:27
3 replies
#333
 | 
Europe obvious
It is equal, it's the same. I don't even know what you are trying to say honestly. 4 = (4) 2(2+2) = 2*(2+2) And that equation will always equal 16.
2019-08-02 18:28
2 replies
it isnt the same. You are stupid if you think that. Yes you can it write differently but when you change the writing during a calculation you get the wrong result. I tried this different writing options with 2 different uni calculator i have hear and they said i am absolutly correct. when 8:2*(2+2) is is 16 when it is 8:2(2*2) is is 1
2019-08-02 18:30
1 reply
#341
 | 
Europe obvious
Calculators are retarded. In real math nothing changes. Both 8:2(2*2) and 8:2*(2+2) equal 16 you like it or not.
2019-08-02 18:31
#596
 | 
Germany hatrez
Got baited nvm. me This cunt is playing
2019-08-04 02:34
where is the equation ?
2019-08-02 13:54
#140
 | 
Brazil igster
16
2019-08-02 13:56
#144
 | 
Spain Krumzeh
16
2019-08-02 13:58
The real question is if we actually see 2(2+2) as a proper object or if we're calculating it the 'robotic' way Most calculators would say it's 16 due to the fact that they are programmed to do stuff in a specific way, but I'd make a strong case for 1 as the real answer, it's the most intuitive and logical answer to me. Arguably, both the equation and question are not well enough defined to come to a concrete answer though
2019-08-02 13:58
19 replies
+1 its 1
2019-08-02 13:58
18 replies
Between the number and bracket there is always multiplication Example: 2(3+5)=2x8=16 11(2x9)=11x18=198 etc.
2019-08-02 14:02
16 replies
ik german and polish education best men)
2019-08-02 14:02
15 replies
But the anwser is 16 there buddy)))
2019-08-02 14:03
14 replies
That's a phrase typically correlated with non-mathematicians men)))
2019-08-02 14:07
13 replies
Thing is you can debate over some hard topics like fooking quantum physics (I wont say I have ANY relevant knowledge). But this is an example of simple primary school order of operations equation. You can call me an ignorant, an example of Dunning-kruger effect, but the anwser is still 16 man And your lack of knowledge and trying to be "enlightened" by saying that there could be more possibilities won't change that
2019-08-02 14:11
12 replies
According to computers, maybe, but opinions are spread between mathematicians and that's what really matters Everyone can do basic maths here, interpretation is key and a big aspect of modern-world mathematics
2019-08-02 14:12
8 replies
What is there to interpret, exactly?
2019-08-02 14:13
7 replies
2019-08-02 14:19
6 replies
Ok man, calculators do it right because: 8:2(2+2)=8:2x(2+2) There is an "unvisible" multiplication sine between "2" and "(" And there always is, examples: 2(3+3)=2x(3+3)=2x6=12 etc. So 8:2x(2+2)= 8:2x4=4x4=16 Thats it If we want the result to be "1" Then we have to do this: 8:[2(2+2)]= ofc 8:[2x(2+2)]= 8:[2x4]=8:8=1 Thats everything to it Hope you understand now
2019-08-02 14:26
2 replies
I'm not proving that 16 is wrong, all I'm saying is that this equation is ambiguous and hence 1 could be considered as a valid answer as well, no need to teach me basic maths, hope you understand now
2019-08-02 14:48
1 reply
#253
 | 
Europe obvious
No, 1 couldn't be considered as a valid answer, at least not in this universe.
2019-08-02 15:15
No, there is nothing to interpret. If we use the rules we have today, there's only the answer 16. If you want to go out of your way and use your own rules, which no other mathematician uses, then you can get what ever the hell you want. But stop saying you can interpret this as something else, because you cannot. We have established rules and by using them every single person in this world will get the same answer. 16. As I already said: This problem comes from a time when we had a different type of problem typing maths. Thus, you'd get one. But we have since established rules that everyone uses and the answer is 16 using those rules.
2019-08-02 14:27
2 replies
2019-08-02 14:48
1 reply
And what I am saying is that by our own rules these days, this equation is not ambiguous. There's one answer.
2019-08-02 14:56
Using order of operations then yes, we'd get 16. There is absolutely no other answer. But this problem comes from a time when we had no order of operations and then you would get 1. I don't know why they continue to use this example, but I guess it's fun to see how "bad" other people are at math.
2019-08-02 14:22
2 replies
Do you have any knowledge about when excatly was the time when mathematicians didnt use order of operations? Brilliant minds of ancient times like Archimedes, Pythagoras, Thales or Euclid didnt use it or what?
2019-08-02 14:30
1 reply
Afaik (a few years since I had the course of maths history) it was in the early 1900's. I'm sure there's something if you google when our modern Order of Operations were accepted.
2019-08-02 14:33
Can't really say that with full confidence, but argumentation is key in maths and imho people in general only execute and forget the actual thinking part most of the time
2019-08-02 14:04
#147
 | 
Australia opzy
16 Solve perentheses then do multiplication/division from left to right
2019-08-02 13:58
16 maybe
2019-08-02 14:00
i would say 1?
2019-08-02 14:02
#161
 | 
Netherlands poeya
16
2019-08-02 14:04
#167
 | 
Belarus danch1k
1
2019-08-02 14:06
#169
sir | 
Brazil h181
16, c'mon
2019-08-02 14:09
#171
 | 
Finland Faifainei
42
2019-08-02 14:09
#173
 | 
Russia Roneeee
Lmaoooo This guys who type 1 or trolling or really stupid
2019-08-02 14:10
#175
 | 
North America daesoulae
8/2(2+2) 8/2(4) 8/8 1
2019-08-02 14:10
2 replies
Nice math you got there murican , i guess you can only eat burgers
2019-08-02 14:12
1 reply
#183
 | 
North America daesoulae
burgers are delicious but i prefer hot dogs men)) hows the sand in egypt? is it tasty?
2019-08-02 14:16
8:2(2+2)= 8:4+4= 2+4= 6
2019-08-02 14:12
2 replies
OMEGALUL xD
2019-08-02 14:13
#256
 | 
Europe obvious
What the fuck have you done? That's not how math works
2019-08-02 15:18
If you dont get 16 , you should prob delete csgo and start learning some 4th grade math
2019-08-02 14:13
16
2019-08-02 14:16
1
2019-08-02 14:17
it's 16 in every way
2019-08-02 14:20
16
2019-08-02 14:21
1
2019-08-02 14:22
2 replies
once you ve done brackets u go from left to right so its 16 because its 8/2*4 and you do dividing first so its 4*4 wich is auto witch is 4-wheel drive
2019-08-02 14:36
1 reply
nt prokda
2019-08-02 14:47
16 man i am engineer trust me
2019-08-02 14:22
16
2019-08-02 14:31
16 and im bad at math ez
2019-08-02 14:33
dunno but somewhere between 14583332 and 34555032
2019-08-02 14:37
#215
 | 
Ukraine d3adLY
1, it`s easy
2019-08-02 14:38
Its 16 and i'm shit at math i didn't done math in like 4 years you need to be dumb af to fail at this.
2019-08-02 14:38
16
2019-08-02 14:40
420
2019-08-02 14:40
8:2(2+2) 2+2 = 4 8:2 = 4 4x4 = 16 😳
2019-08-02 14:58
#244
 | 
Brazil hugoooo
BODMAS = 16 PEMDAS = 1 In Brazil we learn BODMAS, so for me it is 16.
2019-08-02 15:02
10 replies
#259
 | 
Europe obvious
it's 16 for everyone
2019-08-02 15:22
9 replies
#267
 | 
Brazil hugoooo
Actually not... I've seen some mathematicians commenting on this regard, and in fact some situations in math have more than one correct answer, depending on which method you use. Even calculators can have different results based on how they were programmed (following BODMAS or PEMDAS): i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000..
2019-08-02 15:30
8 replies
#268
 | 
Europe obvious
2019-08-02 15:31
2 replies
#269
 | 
Brazil hugoooo
Holy fuck I'm talking with a stone.
2019-08-02 15:31
1 reply
#271
 | 
Europe obvious
Really? Damn bro I wanna see it
2019-08-02 15:31
#323
 | 
Finland FlNLAND
Wait you're fucking with my brain right now... I thought math was designed to be fail-safe
2019-08-02 18:19
1 reply
#608
 | 
CIS ZILTOID
from the way i see it, the difference in these two models is the way we treat "/", once you start using : for division this confusion doesn't exist any more
2019-08-04 11:10
2 replies
#715
 | 
Brazil hugoooo
??? "/" and ":" are the same thing in math (division)... difference is the operation order both calculators use to determine the final outcome.
2019-08-04 20:54
1 reply
#725
 | 
CIS ZILTOID
there’s fraction (which is a number to be frank, a rational one) and then there’s division, which is in fact multiplication (a:b=a*1/b) they are the same though, but their descriptions can be skewed to confuse others
2019-08-04 22:47
16 ofc. You do the paranthesis first and since theres no priority between x and ÷ you start calculating the rest from left. Basic math
2019-08-02 15:10
16. You’re supposed to do the parentheses and then go left to right.
2019-08-02 15:16
8:2(2+2) 8:4+4 8:8 = 1
2019-08-02 15:16
4 replies
#257
 | 
Europe obvious
nice troll
2019-08-02 15:19
3 replies
No u 😏
2019-08-02 15:23
2 replies
#261
 | 
Europe obvious
u
2019-08-02 15:23
1 reply
fine its 16
2019-08-02 15:24
sixteen
2019-08-02 15:21
16 lol, pemdas my bros
2019-08-02 15:25
16
2019-08-02 15:26
#265
 | 
Ukraine ram3n
mind your desicions? / 8/2=4 4*4=16
2019-08-02 15:30
Juan
2019-08-02 15:30
16
2019-08-02 15:31
#272
 | 
Poland Mimaaacz
How tf hltv community got broken with such a simple trick NotLikeThis mens
2019-08-02 15:32
#273
 | 
Germany AdiZen
8:2(2+2) 8:2(4) 8:8=1
2019-08-02 15:34
2 replies
it's not 8:2(4) it's 8:2*4
2019-08-03 06:13
1 reply
#610
 | 
CIS ZILTOID
it's the same doesn't even make sense using parentheses if you don't have an operation within it's boundaries
2019-08-04 11:16
#274
 | 
Sweden Iekr0
8:2*(2+2) 8:(4+4) 2+2 4 So eZ men))
2019-08-02 15:35
2 replies
???????????? content
2019-08-02 15:49
???????????? content
2019-08-02 15:49
everyone who says it's 1 is just baiting. nt hoes
2019-08-02 15:37
#276
B1ad3 | 
Romania csf
is this some kind of a joke?
2019-08-02 15:37
8+8 = 16 - 2*2 = 4 - 4 = 0 8+8+0 = 16/0 = 16 answer 16 ez
2019-08-02 15:38
#278
 | 
African Union mikecool
BIMDAS
2019-08-02 15:40
=Poland?????
2019-08-02 15:45
16
2019-08-02 15:46
16
2019-08-02 15:48
how the fuck did i get euler’s number
2019-08-02 15:48
#293
 | 
Slovakia Pepo))
16 wtf
2019-08-02 16:00
It is 1/3 )
2019-08-02 16:50
1024
2019-08-02 16:54
The answer is 1. Anyone who has other answer should go study maths again from kindergarten.
2019-08-02 16:54
8 replies
noob
2019-08-02 17:44
Multiplications don't have any priority on division, you should follow the left to right rule, so it's 16
2019-08-02 17:45
6 replies
yeah he is noob
2019-08-02 17:46
It depends on what the op meant, im not familiar with the ":" symbol in this context, but people are saying its a fraction. So the solution is either 1 or 16 depending on how ":" is used. If this equation says "8 over 2 multiplied by (2+2) then the answer is 16." However if the equation reads as "8 over a denominator of 2 multiplied by (2+2) then the answer is 1."
2019-08-02 18:01
4 replies
8:2(2+2) == 8/2(2+2) 8/2(4) <--- this is where other people derail to #1 4(4) 16 #1: 8/2(4) 8/8 1 Now you tell me which makes more sense.
2019-08-02 18:35
2 replies
you are looking at this like a problem of order of operations but that isn't where the confusion lies, the confusion lies on the actual format of the equation. So the problem is whether this equation is read as: "A fraction with a numerator of 8 over a denominator 2, multiplied by the sum of 2 and 2" or "A ratio of, 8 to 2 multiplied by (2+2)" From my understanding ":" is used as an indicator of a ratio, so i think this problem should be read as, "A ratio of 8 to 2(2+2)" which would equate to 1:1.
2019-08-02 18:59
1 reply
"you are looking at this like a problem of order of operations but that isn't where the confusion lies" Actually, it is. That's exactly what people are arguing about, it's really that simple. Read the comment tree starting at #317.
2019-08-02 19:23
OP didn’t mean anything, it’s a shitty meme trying to make people sound smart af
2019-08-04 15:02
#303
 | 
Poland GodLk
16
2019-08-02 17:37
answer is 0.9999999999999 because 0.9999999999999 = 1
2019-08-02 17:39
16
2019-08-02 17:44
16
2019-08-02 17:46
8:2(2+2) ==> 4(4) ==> 16 NT
2019-08-02 17:55
#316
nope | 
Finland zntei
16
2019-08-02 18:08
There is one simple mistake by all people who say it is 16. 8:4(2+2) makes 8:2(4) the bracket don't fall away. cuz then it must be 8:2*4 but the "*" isn't there so the bracket stays and you have to end it first. Or you have to change the exercise that means it isn't the same... 8:8=1 People who think it is 16 don't know why there is a bracket at all...
2019-08-02 18:10
79 replies
#326
 | 
Finland FlNLAND
imgur.com/a/fHCYFIe hello? edit: I played myself
2019-08-02 18:24
#327
 | 
Finland FlNLAND
Oh wait it gets even better: imgur.com/a/ZogJ8fG what do you have to say for yourself?
2019-08-02 18:24
16 replies
my uni calculator says I am correct. The difference is the * or no *
2019-08-02 18:31
15 replies
#346
 | 
Europe obvious
There's NO difference. 8:2(2+2) means there is * in there but it's just invisible. It's the same as 8:2*(2+2)
2019-08-02 18:33
2 replies
"equality" isn't the "same". Even in math you should understand that.
2019-08-02 18:35
1 reply
#353
 | 
Europe obvious
But it is the same. Not sure who taught you all this bullshit, but if he/she is a teacher, then he/she should be fired.
2019-08-02 18:36
#349
 | 
Finland FlNLAND
Why not sue google then?
2019-08-02 18:34
4 replies
why should i sue them when you are the retard
2019-08-02 18:36
3 replies
#357
 | 
Finland FlNLAND
2019-08-02 18:37
2 replies
2019-08-02 18:38
1 reply
#361
 | 
Finland FlNLAND
Officially out of arguments. I'll take this win.
2019-08-02 18:38
#354
 | 
Finland FlNLAND
imgur.com/75XDFAt what do you have to say for yourself pt. 2
2019-08-02 18:36
#364
 | 
Europe obvious
Your calculator is calculating this as 8/[2x(2+2)] Like this: 8 8 8 2x(2+2) = 2x4 = 8 = 1 *8/2x(2+2) then 8/2x4 then 8/8 =1* Which is wrong
2019-08-02 18:39
5 replies
I tried both ways as I said With * at the start --16 Without --> 1
2019-08-02 18:40
3 replies
#370
 | 
Finland FlNLAND
Your calculator is giving the wrong answer, you should really get over it bruh Edit: I challenge you to find me a piece of article or literally anything from the internet, that points out that x(y) isn't the same as x*(y) and also some examples of calculations on this. I'll give u my deagle with iBP holo sticker for free if u can do that.
2019-08-02 18:45
#373
 | 
Europe obvious
2019-08-02 18:42
#374
 | 
Europe obvious
It's just not how math works, give up.
2019-08-02 18:42
#367
 | 
Finland FlNLAND
but but but but uni calculator :-(((
2019-08-02 18:40
Since when multiply before divide xDD You just count from left to right so it's 8:2*4=4*4=16
2019-08-02 18:29
8 replies
but you change 2(4) to 2*4 But this isn't the same. It all depends on how the exercise is at the start.
2019-08-02 18:32
7 replies
#347
 | 
Europe obvious
2(4) = 2*4
2019-08-02 18:33
6 replies
equal yes bu not the same.
2019-08-02 18:37
5 replies
#359
 | 
Europe obvious
It is the same, and it equals.
2019-08-02 18:37
4 replies
when it is the same, why you change your calculation, when you change the writing? ohhhn Surprise cuz it isnt the same.
2019-08-02 18:39
3 replies
#365
 | 
Europe obvious
2019-08-02 18:39
2 replies
2019-08-02 18:40
1 reply
#371
 | 
Europe obvious
2019-08-02 18:41
I'm not sure if you're b8ing or not? But just in case you're serious: When you do 2+2=4, the brackets have done their job and it just goes from left to right.
2019-08-02 18:33
49 replies
nope there is no * at the start excercise. When you change it during calculation you calculate a different excerscse. Maybe try different calculators with both "excersie option 8:2*(2+2) --> 16 or 8:2(2+2) --> 1
2019-08-02 18:34
48 replies
#356
 | 
Europe obvious
You are just making up your own math rules at this point.
2019-08-02 18:37
47 replies
and I have arguments. Equality =/= same your argument is repeating that you tsay it is the same. and again when it is them same why do you change your whole calculation cuz of different writing... oh cuz it isn the same.
2019-08-02 18:42
37 replies
#377
 | 
Europe obvious
Doesn't matter what arguments you have, because you are making up your own math rules. Either way, this equation will always equal 16, no matter which way you decide to write it.
2019-08-02 18:43
36 replies
Nope you change the writing during the calculation. So use something that is equal but not the same so you change the exercise.
2019-08-02 18:46
35 replies
#387
 | 
Europe obvious
I can change it, because it will not change the outcome of the equation.
2019-08-02 18:46
8 replies
If you want calculate the given excercise you dont change that. Cuz then it is a different calculation way. That isnt the part of the excercise. it isnt necessary and not the intention of math. Or you calcualte "wie die welt dir gefällt" but that isnt math.
2019-08-02 18:48
7 replies
#392
 | 
Europe obvious
It is not a different way to calculate it then. Find me a source that says it, you are literally making up your own math rules. Give me a source.
2019-08-02 18:49
6 replies
you ignore the basic fact that there is in math a different between "equal" and the "same". I dont ignore any rule.
2019-08-02 18:50
5 replies
#402
 | 
Europe obvious
Give me a source. If it equals, it's the same. It won't change the outcame of any equation, never will. You are truly retarded. I should probably just give up arguing with you, and when you return to school after the summer break to your 6th grade in elementary school, your teacher can explain it to you. You aren't ignoring rules, you are making them up. If there's no * before a bracket, then it's just invisible, but it is still there and nothing changes.
2019-08-02 18:53
4 replies
you see the prove already here. When you change the writing you have a different calculation way. But when both are equal and the same in both calculation ways it must have the same result. But that doesnt happen. you are so tupid that you dont see the prove right in front of you
2019-08-02 18:55
3 replies
#410
 | 
Europe obvious
Bro, come discord or teamspeak or something, I need to give you a math lesson. I really hope you are just baiting man, if not then I'm sorry for you.
2019-08-02 18:55
2 replies
you math is "i calcualte how i want" no thanks. The excerise is without * for a reason.
2019-08-02 18:56
1 reply
#414
 | 
Europe obvious
My math is "I calculate by following the rules" Come discord, please.
2019-08-02 18:56
8:2*(2+2) --> 16 8:2(2+2) --> 16 8:(2*(2+2)) --> 1 8:(2(2+2)) --> 1 If you have "(" you don't need to use *
2019-08-02 18:50
25 replies
if you try it here desmos.com/scientific both way give 1 But I have a logic argument on my side. you all have just a stupid way to do calculations.
2019-08-02 18:52
14 replies
#406
 | 
Europe obvious
My fx 991 ES calculator, and the google calculator as well both say it equals 16. My brain which is not fucking dumb like yours also think it's 16.
2019-08-02 18:53
11 replies
my casio fx-82sx Plus says with *--16 without --> 1
2019-08-02 18:58
10 replies
#421
 | 
Europe obvious
Yes, because your calculator is calculating this as 8/[2x(2+2)] Like this: 8 8 8 2x(2+2) = 2x4 = 8 = 1 *8/2x(2+2) then 8/2x4 then 8/8 =1* Which is incorrect. If there's no * before a bracket, then it's just invisible, but it is still there and nothing changes.
2019-08-02 18:57
9 replies
I understand that it is invsible, but if you want result 16 you need * cuz you change the writing duriing your calculation to get 16 because again equal =/= same
2019-08-02 18:59
8 replies
#427
 | 
Europe obvious
You don't need * for that result, because it will always be 16. With or without * Stop making up your own math rules. There is only 1 result to this, not 2.
2019-08-02 19:00
7 replies
Do you dont get it in your mind that the excerise creator had a reason to write it this way? Also, everyone learns you can write different things differently in math but it isnt allowed to change the value of the exercise and that is what you do. bye
2019-08-02 19:04
6 replies
#433
 | 
Europe obvious
You are dumb, you dont know basic math. Bye
2019-08-02 19:06
5 replies
same to you
2019-08-02 19:10
4 replies
#442
 | 
Europe obvious
One day you will realize how dumb you were today :) Hopefully, if not then you might be retarded. Actually. I'm not even kidding.
2019-08-02 19:11
3 replies
I will never realize that cuz i am right
2019-08-02 19:11
2 replies
#446
 | 
Europe obvious
You are far away from being right. Very far away.
2019-08-02 19:12
1 reply
you dont even know the difference between same und equality in math... So yes i am so far away from right that i am a cricle and I am everything.
2019-08-02 19:17
who cares about stupid specific calculator "you all have just a stupid way to do calculations." Oh, really? So, for 8:2(2+2) you can use only 1 way: 1). 2+2=4; 2). 8:2=4; 3). 4*4=16; 8:2 is more important than 2*(2+2), cuz it's on the left
2019-08-02 18:58
1 reply
some math background en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equality_(mathemat.. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_equivalenc.. when you think you are correct it has to be 2*4<=>2(4) --> same and not 2*4=2(4) --> equal
2019-08-02 19:24
#405
 | 
Europe obvious
+1 If there's no *, then it's just invisible, but it is still there and nothing changes.
2019-08-02 18:52
9 replies
when nothing changes all calulator in the world must have the same result.
2019-08-02 18:57
8 replies
#424
 | 
Europe obvious
I don't even need to change anything, it will always equal 16, what can't you understand? I hope you come to this realization one day and then you will realize how dumb you were trying to argue with everyone in here.
2019-08-02 18:58
7 replies
when you write it down. You change the writing to get 16. Or do you want deny that fact? you make out of 2(4) 2*4 when you dont change that the result is 1 so now go and stay stupid.
2019-08-02 19:01
6 replies
#430
 | 
Europe obvious
There is no fact from you, whatsoever. I tried that desmos bullshit, but it is solving it as 8/[2(2+2)] I can change the writing however I fucking want, it will always result in 16. Try google calculator.
2019-08-02 19:03
5 replies
one simple thing if you calculate it like a kid. you do it this way 8:2(2+2) 8:2(4) you calculate first the value in the brackets before you erase them. This is how kids would calculate that. Then they would think about to erase the brackets. This also the step you make in your mind... but you ignore completely. so before you make 2*4 you still have the brackets when you calculate step by step. bye
2019-08-02 19:08
4 replies
#438
 | 
Europe obvious
My way is the only correct way. Doesn't matter how you draw it. I can draw it with or without * and it will result in 16. Go to school.
2019-08-02 19:08
2 replies
you should do some math classes at college. How you calulate is never the correct way and never will.
2019-08-02 19:09
1 reply
#444
 | 
Europe obvious
I study engineering at college, so I should know how simple basic math like this works :)
2019-08-02 19:11
nice b8
2019-08-02 18:43
8 replies
#379
 | 
Europe obvious
russian flag, I'm not even surprised your math skills are weak
2019-08-02 18:43
7 replies
good sarcasm. #372
2019-08-02 18:44
6 replies
#383
 | 
Europe obvious
My bad then. I just can't see "nice b8" as a sarcasm, sorry.
2019-08-02 18:45
5 replies
no, my bad. I thought, that #356 is about truly answer, but NatsuS is just an idiot
2019-08-02 18:47
4 replies
#390
 | 
Europe obvious
He truly is, I'm getting brain damaged from arguing with him. Pls help me defeat him, if it's even possible.
2019-08-02 18:47
1 reply
ok #394
2019-08-02 18:50
against another tard. Who calculates how he wants. Math is laughing about you
2019-08-02 18:49
1 reply
2019-08-02 18:51
My TI-84 Plus CE-T says it's 16 so either you're baiting, or both you and your $2 calculator are retarded.
2019-08-02 22:29
8/2(2+2) and 8/[2(2+2)] are different. The answers are 16 and 1 respectively.
2019-08-03 06:12
is this my age when dad left me?
2019-08-02 18:15
3 replies
F
2019-08-02 18:28
#343
 | 
Europe obvious
16?
2019-08-02 18:32
1 reply
feelsbad, pay respect pls
2019-08-02 18:50
#328
 | 
Turkey devriyeL
1
2019-08-02 18:24
16
2019-08-02 18:34
16
2019-08-02 18:37
If you don’t get 16 go back to education
2019-08-02 18:39
=16 It's time for russian, cuz Russia is the best math country
2019-08-02 18:42
16
2019-08-02 18:43
It 8/2(4)=8/24=1/3
2019-08-02 18:43
1 reply
#384
 | 
Europe obvious
lmao most creative b8 answer so far
2019-08-02 18:46
8/2(2+2) Solve Parenthesis/Brackets First 8 / 2 x 4 Since its just Division and Multiplication left, you just solve left to right 8 / 2 = 4 then 4 x 4 is 16
2019-08-02 18:46
1 reply
LOL so wrong go back to school. ratio of 8:2 is not the same as dividing 8 and 2
2019-08-03 06:49
#388
 | 
CIS dank1ng
16 brother
2019-08-02 18:46
16
2019-08-02 18:50
16 8/2(2+2) 8/2(4) 8/2 * 4 4*4 16 you just solve left to right with Division and Multiplication
2019-08-02 18:50
1
2019-08-02 18:52
maximum hltv user age
2019-08-02 18:54
3 replies
1?
2019-08-02 18:55
2 replies
16 ofc
2019-08-02 18:55
1 reply
ofc ;)
2019-08-02 18:56
16 ofc : =/= /
2019-08-02 18:54
8:2(2+2)= 8:8=1 =1 proof me wrong
2019-08-02 18:58
5 replies
you are absolutely right at least some users with an IQ here. most think it is 16 LUL
2019-08-02 19:27
3 replies
#465
 | 
Europe obvious
Lmao, this is ridiculous
2019-08-02 20:16
at this point im not even sure if u're trolling or serious :D
2019-08-02 23:20
Nt, common idiot
2019-08-03 05:20
8:2(2+2) =/= 8:8. PEMDAS. 8:2(2+2) = 8:2(4) = 4(4) = 4*4 = 16
2019-08-02 22:22
1
2019-08-02 19:01
1 reply
Monkey education
2019-08-02 19:37
16 /CLOSED
2019-08-02 19:06
+1 /closed
2019-08-02 19:07
ez 16
2019-08-02 19:11
16. if you can't solve this ur literally retarded. /closed
2019-08-02 19:11
If you don't get 16 then you're handicapped.
2019-08-02 19:12
8/2(2+2) 8/2(4) 4(4) 16
2019-08-02 19:21
16 cuz when you don’t have +/X/- between number and ( it counts as X
2019-08-02 19:24
#453
 | 
Palestine Baitor69
8:2x(2+2) 8:2x4 4x4 = 16
2019-08-02 19:25
purplemath.com/modules/orderops.htm answer is 16 .. simple math rules wtf
2019-08-02 19:26
16 are people srsly that uneducated or what for it to have such a long discussion
2019-08-02 19:31
There are two conventions, resulting in both 16 and 1: according to oen convention you "go from left to right" and according to the other one, known as "implied multiplication", multiplication is having a higher precedence than division. The second one used by physical review
2019-08-02 21:04
#471
 | 
Nigeria Asbhdhsbs
Daily "math" thread to bait idiots into thinking it's 1
2019-08-02 21:08
#474
 | 
Lithuania chingo
8:2(2+2) = 8:2*4 = 16
2019-08-02 22:15
Imagine actually thinking it's 1 and not 16.
2019-08-02 22:20
whole question is retarded because 'division sign' is ambiguous which is why you don't see it past elementary school, only idiots get baited by this
2019-08-02 22:20
1 reply
#480
 | 
France Fran6k1D
No it's the brackets which are ambiguous, cauz yo get 4:2(4) and ppl with low IQ think 2(4) is the priority bc of it while it's basically equal to a multiplication sign
2019-08-02 22:27
16
2019-08-02 22:23
1
2019-08-02 22:31
8 replies
You just flunked first-grade maths my friend.
2019-08-02 22:33
7 replies
it depends how u count omfg it can be 16 or 1, both are correct
2019-08-02 22:33
6 replies
Yeah, if you count the wrong way you get 1.
2019-08-02 22:34
5 replies
shut the fuck up
2019-08-02 22:34
4 replies
Mate, how the fuck can both 16 and 1 be correct answers to the same question. If you do it the right way you get one answer.
2019-08-02 22:36
3 replies
I dont give a shit about a fucking math and i read article where was said there are two metods to count. My metod and 2nd one /closed
2019-08-02 22:37
2 replies
"I read article..." Oh damn I didn't know you got your info from an article. You can't have two different correct answers to the same question. That's just basic maths.
2019-08-02 22:39
Lol you're pretty dumb
2019-08-03 05:18
( ) Than * Than : 1
2019-08-02 22:36
6 replies
Multiplication and division have the same priority. When you have both multiplication and division in one equation you start from left to right. Therefore, you divide 8 by 2 before multiplying by 4.
2019-08-02 22:41
5 replies
You probably right
2019-08-02 22:47
#540
 | 
Brazil goatzera
But 8:2(4)= 4 still in the parenthesis
2019-08-03 06:44
3 replies
(4) = 4 mate
2019-08-03 11:24
2 replies
#554
 | 
Brazil goatzera
Nevertheless, there is no priority operation between multiplication and division, so you can find 4.4 or 8:8, both are correct
2019-08-03 19:45
1 reply
Actually, there is. If you have both multiplication and division in the same math equation you solve it from left to right. Therefore, you start with 8:2.
2019-08-03 21:42
68
2019-08-02 22:38
1 men
2019-08-02 22:53
It's 16. People who say it's 1 learned maths in 1917
2019-08-02 22:54
501 replies wtf
2019-08-02 23:22
#502
 | 
Myanmar xdcc
solve for what? not valid equation
2019-08-02 23:26
+1 Edit: This is an expression, not an equation. You should remove the '=' and just ask us to simplify.
2019-08-02 23:28
#505
shox | 
Norway fen0m
nt retard u got this from 9gag facebook
2019-08-02 23:46
it's 16 and that's the end of it bois.
2019-08-03 01:54
1 reply
+1 How can this kind of problem trick so much people...
2019-08-03 01:59
1 ez
2019-08-03 02:01
16, its fucking easy. for NA (at least) we use PEMDAS, which means parenthesis -> exponent -> multiplication or division (read from left to right) -> Addition or subtraction (read from left to right)
2019-08-03 02:05
1 reply
bro the answer is 42069 wtf
2019-08-03 05:28
#515
 | 
Switzerland RU!N
16 ofc
2019-08-03 02:09
#516
 | 
Slovakia CRMN1
16 and whoever says 1 is either trolling or incredibly misinformed. There is literally no mathematical rule that says you should do multiplication first when there are parenthesis. First you solve the parenthesis and then, in this case, you solve it left to right.
2019-08-03 02:22
1 reply
+1
2019-08-03 05:15
#517
 | 
Fiji edgy_man
this thread has 516 replies holyshit are u guys actually retarded
2019-08-03 02:34
1 reply
you just played yourself
2019-08-03 05:56
#518
 | 
Russia Blyatmen
Its 15 eu tards
2019-08-03 03:04
#519
 | 
Brunei GucciLeIe
As a M. Sc. Of Mathematics I think that there is no real point in asking this question men)) Because basically it is not a problem of algebra but just an unclear notation. Conventially the expression "a:b" (where a /in /mathbb{R} and b /neq 0) is understood as /frac{a}{b}. Thus your problem would simplify to "what is the value of 4*4?"
2019-08-03 03:13
isn't it 1? 8/ 2(2+2) = 8/ (4+4) = 8/8 = 1 the multiplication is a part of the parentheses, and so it's done before the division. Edit: google.com/search?q=8+divided+by+2+(2%2B.. I guess not
2019-08-03 05:39
1 reply
#535
 | 
Slovakia CRMN1
Multiplication part of the parenthesis since when? lol Parenthesis first (2+2=4), now you're left with a division and a multiplication. Since there's no mathematical priority between mult. and div. , you solve it left to right.
2019-08-03 06:36
im losing braincells reading these retarded threads saying its 1
2019-08-03 05:57
It's 16 and if you don't know it's 16 you're dumb
2019-08-03 05:58
10 replies
#533
 | 
Brazil goatzera
You're dumb af 8:2(2+2)= 8:2(4)= 4 still in the parenthesis 8:8 = 1 NA BRAIN /closed
2019-08-03 06:26
9 replies
How are you actually this stupid Pemdas
2019-08-03 07:36
It's literally parenthesis then left to right in division multiplication. It simplifies down to 4 x 4
2019-08-03 07:38
7 replies
#553
 | 
Brazil goatzera
I just found the both results are right, because even if you eliminate the parenthesis, there is no priority operation between multiplication and division.
2019-08-03 19:36
6 replies
Yeah but you go left to right, dividing first, hence it is sixteen. There can't be 2 answers to an equation that doesn't have variables.
2019-08-03 19:59
3 replies
To be fair, 8:2(2+2) isn't an equation.
2019-08-03 20:02
2 replies
Well he should've said to simplify it instead of putting "="
2019-08-03 20:03
1 reply
Yeah, it's an expression which can be simplified (to 16, of course). Just wanted to be a know-it-all. :P You seem educated in maths at least. :)
2019-08-03 20:07
Left to right. That's always the order between two things in the same step of the order of operations :)
2019-08-03 20:07
#640
 | 
Europe obvious
No, 16 is the only right answer. You are indeed stupid.
2019-08-04 12:28
#530
 | 
Russia TheVad9
16?
2019-08-03 06:02
#534
 | 
Russia MAGEFISTY
Wtf so many stupid burgers keep talking about 1
2019-08-03 06:32
3 replies
Yes because it is 1. Ruski education.
2019-08-03 06:40
1 reply
#538
 | 
Russia MAGEFISTY
2019-08-03 06:41
Not just burgers. I can't believe how bad people are at math. It's obviously 16
2019-08-03 07:42
Its 6
2019-08-03 17:36
easy, simple mathematic If you carry out the division first what you get is 4×4 = 16 and if you carry out the multiplication you get 8÷8 = 1 The correct answer is 16
2019-08-03 19:51
2 replies
0 IQ spotted
2019-08-03 19:54
1 reply
#642
 | 
Europe obvious
0 IQ spotted
2019-08-04 12:29
Its 1 ROFL are y'all retarded
2019-08-03 19:54
2 replies
You didn't use order of operations, my friend.
2019-08-03 19:56
please go back to school
2019-08-03 19:58
A bit late but 16 Order of operations, start w/ parethenses and add 2 and 2 to get 4. Next you divide 8 by 2 to get 4. Then take 4 and multiply it by 4 to get 16. Easy
2019-08-03 19:55
my math app says 16 ;D calculator > human brain!
2019-08-03 19:59
-0 //close comment
2019-08-03 20:00
the funny thing is basically it's 1, but the answer also is 16
2019-08-03 20:11
1 reply
#643
 | 
Europe obvious
No, its 16. There's only one correct answer
2019-08-04 12:29
Its 16 you braindead retards. 8/2(2+2) 1.Brackets first 2+2 = 4 2. Now we have 8/2*4 3. Division and multiplication have the same priority. But division is first from left to right. So we will divide first. 4. 4*4= 16
2019-08-03 20:26
isn't (2+2) in denominator??
2019-08-03 20:30
Should just ban all the tards here lmao
2019-08-03 20:34
Its 16 U Go from left to right
2019-08-03 20:45
2+2=4 2*4=8 8:8=1
2019-08-03 22:08
2 replies
people saying 16 are so dumb LUL
2019-08-04 02:18
1 reply
Actually there is two valid methods I mean there's no international standars It just depends on the country For example all north americans stands for 16 because thats the method they use in the USA Thats the reason why there's such a controversy about It I just cant remember the method names
2019-08-04 02:39
2019-08-03 22:05
#589
 | 
United States iiScourge
16
2019-08-04 02:17
69
2019-08-04 02:21
LMAO I showed this to my family after laughing at the comments on facebook saying 16, and my father replied 0, I lol'd. Totally 1 btw
2019-08-04 02:43
5 replies
#644
 | 
Europe obvious
Totally 1 if you skipped math classes at elementary school
2019-08-04 12:30
4 replies
Both results are alright tho
2019-08-04 20:53
3 replies
#714
 | 
Europe obvious
only 16 is right
2019-08-04 20:53
2 replies
Ah you take HLTV forums seriously, hahaha, what a guy
2019-08-04 20:56
1 reply
#720
 | 
Europe obvious
I take math seriously
2019-08-04 21:20
#602
 | 
North Macedonia thrash94
2 + 2 is 4 - 1 that's 3 Quik mef
2019-08-04 04:58
8:2(2+2)=1
2019-08-04 10:59
#606
 | 
Bosnia and Herzegovina jeonSuCc
16 anyway
2019-08-04 11:02
#607
 | 
Slovakia baucek1
8
2019-08-04 11:06
1 omfg just write it like a fraction
2019-08-04 11:12
8 / 2 ( 2 + 2 ) = 8 / 2 * 4 = 4 * 4 = 16
2019-08-04 11:22
5 replies
no 8/2(2+2) use the distributive property before solving. 8/(4+4) simplify parentheses 8/(8) solve 1
2019-08-04 11:29
4 replies
expected from 1iq american :/
2019-08-04 11:29
3 replies
distributive property takes place outside of order of operations, allowing it to be used before anything else. This is an accurate solution to the equation.
2019-08-04 11:31
2 replies
mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2019/07/31/wh.. if you lived in 1917 you might've been correct, but you americans probably do so thats why you think it's 1
2019-08-04 11:32
1 reply
math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers.. Well the math department at berkeley would actually disagree with us both. Apparently the equation is ambiguous and thus can not be solved.
2019-08-04 11:49
1
2019-08-04 11:36
whats up with these elementary school math threads, everyone going crazy about them :DDD 16
2019-08-04 11:41
16 8 / 2 (2 + 2) = 16 You always do ( ) first and then the rest. And since its 8 / 2 into a ( ) You Multiply the to.
2019-08-04 11:45
omg is this shit still going xD
2019-08-04 11:50
´wow hltv is full of mathmagicians but of course is 16 and don't waste time with reply if you think its not.
2019-08-04 12:27
2010 Field Medal awarded guy said the only correct answer is : "this writing is ambiguous, correct it"
2019-08-04 12:28
Why is everybody posting to this shit elementaryschool basic math thread? Even 10 year old knows what's answer.
2019-08-04 12:33
3 replies
what's answer
2019-08-04 15:37
2 replies
16
2019-08-04 19:34
1 reply
Please tell me you're trolling
2019-08-04 19:45
everyone saying sth else than 16 should visit the 1st class again or go to a mental health doctor
2019-08-04 12:34
wtf men((( it's so hard my turkish brain can't handle this (((
2019-08-04 12:46
16
2019-08-04 12:48
#651
 | 
Czech Republic PaYaB
1 plus 1 is 3 Change my mind.
2019-08-04 12:54
1 reply
/open exec change your mind /closed
2019-08-04 16:07
All of you using this "pemdas"/"bimas" shit, look here If you have two operations that you have to carry out that are of the same order, you have to go from right to left. Stop using these NA trash mental tricks
2019-08-04 15:37
2 replies
Left to right
2019-08-04 16:12
1 reply
fuck english
2019-08-04 16:14
1 LMAO
2019-08-04 15:41
#667
 | 
France J0riS
The answer is 1
2019-08-04 15:43
wtf is happening here 600replies+
2019-08-04 16:02
16 ._.
2019-08-04 16:05
#687
 | 
Slovakia RIPicasso
1
2019-08-04 16:26
16 obviously
2019-08-04 18:02
1 reply
and whoever says something else, isnt very good at maths
2019-08-04 18:03
16
2019-08-04 19:51
its easy 8 / 2 * 4 = 1... wait :D
2019-08-04 19:52
its 1
2019-08-04 19:52
HLTV users third world education
2019-08-04 19:56
#717
 | 
United States fart_lmao
Not enough info here. We need to know whether it's the quantity of (8:2) multiplied by (2 + 2) or if it's the quantity of 8 divided by the product of 2 * (2+2). If its the former, the answer is 16. If it's the latter the answer is 1 edit: I am not familiar with the (:) operator so I'm not sure if it has any special rules that apply when used
2019-08-04 20:59
2 replies
nice NA brain lmao
2019-08-04 21:26
1 reply
What was stupid about that? His explanation was clear as it was correct. It's why we use fractions more than the division sign
2019-08-05 12:52
16
2019-08-04 21:01
Most autistic thread i've seen in a while for sure :D
2019-08-04 21:25
Well the equation is invalid so the real answer is "please correct it" But it's 16 :)
2019-08-05 12:41
0/8
2019-08-05 13:18
You resolve parenthesis first. 8:2x4 4x4 = 16
2019-08-07 22:48
16 mens)))))))
2019-08-07 22:54
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.
Now playing
Thumbnail for stream
United Kingdom
ESL TV
8310 viewers
Top streams
All(15)
Casters(9)
Streamers(4)
Organizers(2)
United Kingdom
ESL TV
(8310)
Brazil
gaules
(8192)
United Kingdom
smooya
(854)
Brazil
kNgV-
(639)
United States
Cooper-
(504)
France
1pv
(374)
Brazil
mch
(334)
Argentina
JonY BoY
(251)
Brazil
Apoka
(214)
Brazil
Gamers Club
(191)
Brazil
Jogando Junto
(190)
Russia
watchfulTV
(31)
Argentina
River Plate
(74)
Brazil
cutzmeretz
(24)
United States
Northern Forces
(8)