97 replies
60 replies
58 replies
16/2. (2+2) -= 16
bye noob
56 replies
Sry but you are wrong.
Sure u do ( 2+2) first.. Than it comes down to multiplication and division. Theres no rule which one has a higher priority so you start from left to right not right to left.
54 replies
26 replies
Lmao?
25 replies
24 replies
Yes
22 replies
21 replies
Yeah but
Division and Multiplication: Starting from the left, work these out in the order that they appear in the equation. If multiplication appears first you should complete this before division.
20 replies
19 replies
0/8
5 replies
4 replies
0/8
3 replies
2 replies
1 reply
+1
7 replies
6 replies
5 replies
4 replies
The problem rewritten is (8/2)*(2+2)
2 replies
1 reply
yes, just like you are in the original problem
BODMAS - Brackets of Division, Multiplication, Addition, Subtraction
It works as:
1. Brackets
2. Division or Multiplication
3. Addition or Subtraction
BODMAS sounds way BOMDAS or BODMSA
In your case, BIDMAS sounds way better as an acronym than BIMDAS or BIDMSA
just use calculator mens B)
1 reply
Yes. Answer is 16
Don't need a calculator for something this simple
10 replies
Google it
9 replies
google.com/search?client=avg&q=math+prio.. There you go, now stfu you are still wrong. Go to school
8 replies
Just shorten the story, answer is 16 and life goes on
5 replies
3 replies
You're wrong, stop arguing, you only make yourself look stupid.
What you forget is that there is a multiplication sign between the 2 outside the bracket and the stuff within the bracket
u are retarded
12 replies
Google it
5 replies
google.com/search?client=avg&q=math+prio.. There you go, now stfu you are still wrong. Go to school
4 replies
Yes kid. But it comes down to multiplication and division. None of these 2 have the higher priority. So you do left to right. Denmark education LUL
3 replies
2 replies
Read the first few comments again and rethink your whole life
5 replies
+1
/close
You just described what he did in the first place stop consuming shrooms
Its dividing
7 replies
TEACH THEM MY SLAV BROTHER
1 reply
dumb polak thinks he is ”smart” because he uses quotation mark LUL
4 replies
2 replies
burger spotted
12 replies
it's 16 u noob
6 replies
r/wooosh ._.
4 replies
nt
Na education LMAO
8 replies
fuck bro we actually dumb as fuck
we only ever use \
7 replies
You mean "/" xaxaxaxaxaaxaxa 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
4 replies
Lmao
BRUH my iq just went below zero
1 reply
i know you’re just trying to make me feel better, dad.
HAHAHA American HAHAHAH
Sorry i don't count time by measuring feet per hamburger.
2 replies
There is 1382 hamburgers in 863 feet so the time is 54:92 A.M right now
1 reply
4:20 time to blaze mens)))
16/2. (2+2) -= 16
bye noob
18 replies
16 replies
14 replies
10 replies
5 replies
2 replies
India good at maths.
Are you fucking joking or what?/
China numba one then is US because of slaves they bring from China and other countries, third is Canada for the same reason. Then comes ex-USSR, then Europe....etc
India will be like 50. These are Math olympiad 2019 stats. Out of 6 members US and Canada had like 4,4 chinese immigrants. China was ranked 1 and US was 2.
Who gave you 0 B/
he meant its division which is basically just fractions, and its 8/8 which is 1, but in reality the answer is 16 and it is not a fraction
edit: i basically said what you already knew but was trying to explain his retardation
edit 2: this equation is stupid because in NA : is / which is division and fraction so if the equation was written on paper with the proper symbol he would understand it better
1 reply
+1
1 reply
go back to school
actually its 8\2*2+2 = 8\6 = 1.33
W R O N G
16
1 reply
=D
12 replies
nt, pemdASS
7 replies
Nt
bruh
it's not an equation
2 replies
do you see that "=" sign there? that = means equals, so yes it is an equation <(((-_-)))>
1 reply
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation
"In mathematics, an equation is a statement that asserts the equality of two expressions"
If medias are calling this expression "an equation", it doesn't mean they are right
3 replies
2 replies
12 replies
2 replies
Imagine you didn't know basic maffs bro
Ofc u can do everything with a calculator but you would be so fucking stupid in all other areas of life. Remember:
If in other sciences we should arrive at certainty without doubt, it behooves us to place the foundations of knowledge in mathematics.
8 replies
7 replies
Yeah but imagine you had just quit maffs after second grade or whatever this crap is.
You'd be half the person ur today.
6 replies
5 replies
Yeah but it schools ur brain in more ways than one.
Ppl always say meeeh never needed 3/4 of the crap I learned in school but they forget they'd be dumb as shit had they not learned this crap.
1 reply
mathematics teach you how to use brain, you don't need to directly use stuff from classes irl
it's like with gym, will you need to lift 150kg while lying on the ground in normal life?????? no, but it surely makes you stronger healthier and more confident overall
math is the same but for brain, trust me if you never learned math in your life you'd have 40 IQ less
2 replies
This
2 replies
1
8:2(2+2)
8:2(4)
8:8
1
18 replies
15 replies
doesnt matter lmao
14 replies
13 replies
no
12 replies
11 replies
I see LMAO
I am retarded
8 replies
7 replies
8:2(4)
8:2*4
is no difference
but I failed something else
6 replies
8:2*4 first u take 8:2 = 4 then you take 4*4 = 16
3 replies
2 replies
hahah wtf
nt 1917 nibba
You calculate whats between the brackets first then do the maths in order, from left to right
8:2(2+2)=8:2*4=4*4=16
1 reply
Gj
16 or 1, depends on which way you count. This writing is bad, correct in maths but ambiguous...
11 replies
7 replies
Actually no but you're right here. I badly expressed myself. I never intended to say "there is 2 results here, 1 and 16" but I wanted to say "The debate between 1 and 16 is caused by the ambigious writing of this expression". Of course I went to school i know it's 16 but the linear writing like this can make the whole equation really hard to read and thus to solve.
6 replies
5 replies
Tru
Or 2(2+2):8
Not necessarily, the ":" symbol denotes a ratio/division.
8:2(2+2) can be read as a fraction with a numerator of 8 and a denominator of 2(2+2) which would return an answer of 1.
2 replies
Yes but that would meamit was 8/(2(4)
its always 16 lol
8:2 is same like 8/2 so you gonna always convert that to 4 before you gonna do anything with it
2 replies
16 wtf
16 why is this even debatable?
ppl skip math since they are 10 y/o or what the fuck?
5 replies
1 reply
well that's just idiotic in a world that will have robots replace lowIQ jobs
look at the replies and wonder, plenty of people saying it's 1
2 replies
??? it's basic math that you learn with 10 normally
1 reply
yes.
16.
31 maybe?
1.6 Noobs <3 ez for PashaBiceps
GO VP GO VP! <3
153 . 353 . 654 , 099
6 replies
2 replies
+11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
7
It is 16 because
8/2 *4
32/2
Pm me if I'm wrong
4 replies
1 reply
it is not wrong, look:
a/b * c = ac/b
in this example a = 8, b = 2, c= 4
Everyone agrees on 8:2*4
You should do it from left to right, that's the rule. So:
8:2*4=4*4=16
16 ez
16
If you don't get 16 go back to school
4x4=16 easy
Seriously, where the fuck do you people live to have such shitty education?
You learn that shit when ur like literally 10.
8 replies
4 replies
Obviously it's 1. People are dumb nowadays.
2 replies
1 reply
Well, why not? I could be a really good one.
8/2(2+2)
8/8
1
2 is linked with parenthesis
6 replies
3 replies
fixed
2 replies
16 if anyone else got anything else drink bleach
1.6 Noobs <3 ez for PashaBiceps
GO VP GO VP! <3!!!
are you guys like retarded?
It's 1
--> 8:2(2+2) You have to calculate the brackets first
--> 8/2(4) If you put the "4" out of the brackets the result is in the end 16 but you have to leave the "4" in the brackets because why would you "delete" the brackets(sry for bad england). Then 2*(4) bcuz brackets always first.
--> 8/8 8 divided by 8 is obviously 1
--> 1
Here you have it mens))
46 replies
wtf dude its so simple why u get it wrong
8:2(2+2)=
8:2 = 4
4(2+2)
4(4)
16
24 replies
23 replies
it doesnt matter it doesnt change my result, you do whats IN the brackets then you do 8:2, then x that by whatever is in brackets
22 replies
10 replies
read my edit
4 replies
3 replies
2 replies
it may be the same. But the start exercise has 2(2+2) and not 2*(2+2)
What would be more correct cuz you use at 2+2 brackets cuz it is necessary you don't use bracket to don't use the * this is only a sideffect.
1 reply
2(2+2) and 2*(2+2) are the same
also if u genuinely think it's 1 please dont reply to me anymore, you subhuman
4 replies
10 replies
L2M,
8/2(2+2)
8/4+4
8/8
1
9 replies
8 replies
i.imgur.com/pCZIUbX.jpg
wtf dude your brains
l2m
7 replies
imgur.com/a/Qmgytbj
Your calculator is calculating this as 8/[2x(2+2)]
Like this:
8 8 8
2x(2+2) = 2x4 = 8 = 1
*8/2x(2+2) then 8/2x4 then 8/8 =1*
Which is wrong
6 replies
So your trustin basic internet caculator over TI NSPIRE CAS CX???
Do you even math?
5 replies
4 replies
"Historically the symbol ÷ was used to mean you should divide by the entire product on the right of the symbol."
poor me =(
3 replies
You are using outdated methods. PEMDAS mate.
8:2(2+2) = 8:2(4) = 4(4) = 4*4 = 16
19 replies
18 replies
Huh? If you have both division and multiplication in a math problem, you solve it from left to right. And since 8:2 is before the (4) you solve it first.
6 replies
5 replies
(4) = 4 mate.
4 replies
3 replies
No, What you are solving is 8:(2*4) which is 1. Brackets DO come first but you solve what's INSIDE of the brackets. And if (4) isn't 4 then what is it?
wtf dude 4 is 4 brackets go away when the actions in it are completed
10 replies
you write (4) cuz there is no *
and without * the bracket has to finish first before you calculate.
9 replies
8 replies
the start exercise has 2(2+2) and not 2*(2+2)
What would be more correct? you use at 2+2 brackets cuz it is necessary you don't use brackets to don't use the * this is only a side effect
You took a bullshit way by editing the exercise.
7 replies
6 replies
did u actually read what I wrote?
The consequence is when u calculate (2+2) is that it stays (4) and not *4
Because if the exercise want to be 16 it does 2*(2+2)
When you change that during the calculation you edit the exercise even when it basically equal.
But "equal" isn't the "same"
I dunno if in English there is a meaning difference between "equal" and "same" but in german it is.
It has to be the same not equal.
5 replies
4 replies
you actually said it is equally not the same #325
and you still change the excercise when you change that during the calculation
3 replies
2 replies
it isnt the same. You are stupid if you think that.
Yes you can it write differently but when you change the writing during a calculation you get the wrong result.
I tried this different writing options with 2 different uni calculator i have hear and they said i am absolutly correct.
when 8:2*(2+2) is is 16
when it is 8:2(2*2) is is 1
1 reply
The real question is if we actually see 2(2+2) as a proper object or if we're calculating it the 'robotic' way
Most calculators would say it's 16 due to the fact that they are programmed to do stuff in a specific way, but I'd make a strong case for 1 as the real answer, it's the most intuitive and logical answer to me. Arguably, both the equation and question are not well enough defined to come to a concrete answer though
19 replies
18 replies
16 replies
15 replies
14 replies
That's a phrase typically correlated with non-mathematicians men)))
13 replies
Thing is you can debate over some hard topics like fooking quantum physics (I wont say I have ANY relevant knowledge).
But this is an example of simple primary school order of operations equation.
You can call me an ignorant, an example of Dunning-kruger effect, but the anwser is still 16 man
And your lack of knowledge and trying to be "enlightened" by saying that there could be more possibilities won't change that
12 replies
According to computers, maybe, but opinions are spread between mathematicians and that's what really matters
Everyone can do basic maths here, interpretation is key and a big aspect of modern-world mathematics
8 replies
7 replies
6 replies
Ok man, calculators do it right because:
8:2(2+2)=8:2x(2+2)
There is an "unvisible" multiplication sine between "2" and "("
And there always is, examples:
2(3+3)=2x(3+3)=2x6=12 etc.
So 8:2x(2+2)= 8:2x4=4x4=16
Thats it
If we want the result to be "1"
Then we have to do this:
8:[2(2+2)]= ofc 8:[2x(2+2)]= 8:[2x4]=8:8=1
Thats everything to it
Hope you understand now
2 replies
I'm not proving that 16 is wrong, all I'm saying is that this equation is ambiguous and hence 1 could be considered as a valid answer as well, no need to teach me basic maths, hope you understand now
1 reply
No, there is nothing to interpret. If we use the rules we have today, there's only the answer 16. If you want to go out of your way and use your own rules, which no other mathematician uses, then you can get what ever the hell you want. But stop saying you can interpret this as something else, because you cannot. We have established rules and by using them every single person in this world will get the same answer. 16.
As I already said: This problem comes from a time when we had a different type of problem typing maths. Thus, you'd get one. But we have since established rules that everyone uses and the answer is 16 using those rules.
2 replies
1 reply
Using order of operations then yes, we'd get 16. There is absolutely no other answer. But this problem comes from a time when we had no order of operations and then you would get 1. I don't know why they continue to use this example, but I guess it's fun to see how "bad" other people are at math.
2 replies
1 reply
Can't really say that with full confidence, but argumentation is key in maths and imho people in general only execute and forget the actual thinking part most of the time
16 maybe
i would say 1?
2 replies
8:2(2+2)=
8:4+4=
2+4= 6
2 replies
it's 16 in every way
2 replies
1 reply
nt prokda
16 man i am engineer trust me
420
10 replies
9 replies
Actually not... I've seen some mathematicians commenting on this regard, and in fact some situations in math have more than one correct answer, depending on which method you use.
Even calculators can have different results based on how they were programmed (following BODMAS or PEMDAS):
i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000..
8 replies
2 replies
1 reply
2 replies
1 reply
16 ofc. You do the paranthesis first and since theres no priority between x and ÷ you start calculating the rest from left. Basic math
16. You’re supposed to do the parentheses and then go left to right.
8:2(2+2)
8:4+4
8:8 = 1
4 replies
3 replies
sixteen
16 lol, pemdas my bros
16
Juan
16
2 replies
it's not 8:2(4) it's 8:2*4
1 reply
everyone who says it's 1 is just baiting. nt hoes
8+8 = 16
- 2*2 = 4 - 4 = 0
8+8+0 = 16/0 = 16
answer 16
ez
16
16
how the fuck did i get euler’s number
1024
The answer is 1.
Anyone who has other answer should go study maths again from kindergarten.
8 replies
noob
6 replies
yeah he is noob
It depends on what the op meant, im not familiar with the ":" symbol in this context, but people are saying its a fraction. So the solution is either 1 or 16 depending on how ":" is used.
If this equation says "8 over 2 multiplied by (2+2) then the answer is 16."
However if the equation reads as "8 over a denominator of 2 multiplied by (2+2) then the answer is 1."
4 replies
2 replies
you are looking at this like a problem of order of operations but that isn't where the confusion lies, the confusion lies on the actual format of the equation.
So the problem is whether this equation is read as:
"A fraction with a numerator of 8 over a denominator 2, multiplied by the sum of 2 and 2"
or
"A ratio of, 8 to 2 multiplied by (2+2)"
From my understanding ":" is used as an indicator of a ratio, so i think this problem should be read as, "A ratio of 8 to 2(2+2)" which would equate to 1:1.
1 reply
"you are looking at this like a problem of order of operations but that isn't where the confusion lies"
Actually, it is. That's exactly what people are arguing about, it's really that simple.
Read the comment tree starting at #317.
answer is 0.9999999999999
because 0.9999999999999 = 1
16
16
8:2(2+2) ==> 4(4) ==> 16 NT
There is one simple mistake by all people who say it is 16.
8:4(2+2)
makes
8:2(4)
the bracket don't fall away.
cuz then it must be 8:2*4
but the "*" isn't there so the bracket stays and you have to end it first. Or you have to change the exercise that means it isn't the same...
8:8=1
People who think it is 16 don't know why there is a bracket at all...
79 replies
imgur.com/a/fHCYFIe
hello?
edit: I played myself
Oh wait it gets even better:
imgur.com/a/ZogJ8fG
what do you have to say for yourself?
16 replies
my uni calculator says I am correct. The difference is the * or no *
15 replies
2 replies
"equality" isn't the "same".
Even in math you should understand that.
1 reply
4 replies
imgur.com/75XDFAt
what do you have to say for yourself pt. 2
5 replies
I tried both ways as I said
With * at the start --16
Without --> 1
3 replies
Your calculator is giving the wrong answer, you should really get over it bruh
Edit: I challenge you to find me a piece of article or literally anything from the internet, that points out that x(y) isn't the same as x*(y) and also some examples of calculations on this.
I'll give u my deagle with iBP holo sticker for free if u can do that.
imgur.com/a/Qmgytbj
gyazo.com/0e102c93b920201cc1d33633c9ef1e..
8 replies
but you change 2(4)
to 2*4
But this isn't the same. It all depends on how the exercise is at the start.
7 replies
6 replies
equal yes bu not the same.
5 replies
4 replies
when it is the same, why you change your calculation, when you change the writing?
ohhhn Surprise
cuz it isnt the same.
3 replies
2 replies
1 reply
imgur.com/a/Qmgytbj
gyazo.com/0e102c93b920201cc1d33633c9ef1e..
I'm not sure if you're b8ing or not? But just in case you're serious:
When you do 2+2=4, the brackets have done their job and it just goes from left to right.
49 replies
nope there is no * at the start excercise. When you change it during calculation you calculate a different excerscse.
Maybe try different calculators with both "excersie option
8:2*(2+2) --> 16
or
8:2(2+2) --> 1
48 replies
47 replies
and I have arguments.
Equality =/= same
your argument is repeating that you tsay it is the same. and again when it is them same
why do you change your whole calculation cuz of different writing...
oh
cuz it isn the same.
37 replies
36 replies
Nope you change the writing during the calculation. So use something that is equal but not the same so you change the exercise.
35 replies
8 replies
If you want calculate the given excercise you dont change that. Cuz then it is a different calculation way. That isnt the part of the excercise. it isnt necessary and not the intention of math.
Or you calcualte "wie die welt dir gefällt" but that isnt math.
7 replies
6 replies
you ignore the basic fact that there is in math a different between "equal" and the "same".
I dont ignore any rule.
5 replies
Give me a source. If it equals, it's the same. It won't change the outcame of any equation, never will. You are truly retarded. I should probably just give up arguing with you, and when you return to school after the summer break to your 6th grade in elementary school, your teacher can explain it to you.
You aren't ignoring rules, you are making them up.
If there's no * before a bracket, then it's just invisible, but it is still there and nothing changes.
4 replies
you see the prove already here.
When you change the writing you have a different calculation way.
But when both are equal and the same in both calculation ways it must have the same result. But that doesnt happen.
you are so tupid that you dont see the prove right in front of you
3 replies
2 replies
you math is "i calcualte how i want" no thanks.
The excerise is without * for a reason.
1 reply
25 replies
if you try it here
desmos.com/scientific
both way give 1
But I have a logic argument on my side.
you all have just a stupid way to do calculations.
14 replies
11 replies
my casio fx-82sx Plus
says with *--16
without --> 1
10 replies
9 replies
I understand that it is invsible, but if you want result 16 you need *
cuz you change the writing duriing your calculation to get 16
because again equal =/= same
8 replies
7 replies
Do you dont get it in your mind that the excerise creator had a reason to write it this way?
Also, everyone learns you can write different things differently in math but it isnt allowed to change the value of the exercise and that is what you do.
bye
6 replies
5 replies
same to you
4 replies
3 replies
I will never realize that cuz i am right
2 replies
1 reply
you dont even know the difference between same und equality in math...
So yes i am so far away from right that i am a cricle and I am everything.
1 reply
some math background
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equality_(mathemat..
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_equivalenc..
when you think you are correct it has to be
2*4<=>2(4) --> same
and not
2*4=2(4) --> equal
9 replies
when nothing changes all calulator in the world must have the same result.
8 replies
7 replies
when you write it down. You change the writing to get 16.
Or do you want deny that fact?
you make out of 2(4)
2*4
when you dont change that the result is 1
so now go and stay stupid.
6 replies
5 replies
one simple thing if you calculate it like a kid.
you do it this way
8:2(2+2)
8:2(4)
you calculate first the value in the brackets before you erase them. This is how kids would calculate that.
Then they would think about to erase the brackets.
This also the step you make in your mind...
but you ignore completely.
so before you make 2*4 you still have the brackets when you calculate step by step.
bye
4 replies
2 replies
you should do some math classes at college.
How you calulate is never the correct way and never will.
1 reply
8 replies
7 replies
6 replies
5 replies
4 replies
1 reply
My TI-84 Plus CE-T says it's 16 so either you're baiting, or both you and your $2 calculator are retarded.
is this my age when dad left me?
3 replies
16
If you don’t get 16 go back to education
8/2(2+2)
Solve Parenthesis/Brackets First
8 / 2 x 4
Since its just Division and Multiplication left, you just solve left to right
8 / 2 = 4 then 4 x 4 is 16
1 reply
maximum hltv user age
3 replies
2 replies
16 ofc
: =/= /
8:2(2+2)=
8:8=1
=1
proof me wrong
5 replies
you are absolutely right
at least some users with an IQ here.
most think it is 16 LUL
3 replies
at this point im not even sure if u're trolling or serious :D
Nt, common idiot
8:2(2+2) =/= 8:8.
PEMDAS.
8:2(2+2) = 8:2(4) = 4(4) = 4*4 = 16
1 reply
Monkey education
16 /CLOSED
+1
/closed
ez 16
16.
if you can't solve this ur literally retarded.
/closed
8/2(2+2)
8/2(4)
4(4)
16
16 cuz when you don’t have +/X/- between number and ( it counts as X
purplemath.com/modules/orderops.htm
answer is 16 .. simple math rules wtf
There are two conventions, resulting in both 16 and 1: according to oen convention you "go from left to right" and according to the other one, known as "implied multiplication", multiplication is having a higher precedence than division. The second one used by physical review
Imagine actually thinking it's 1 and not 16.
whole question is retarded because 'division sign' is ambiguous which is why you don't see it past elementary school, only idiots get baited by this
1 reply
16
1
8 replies
You just flunked first-grade maths my friend.
7 replies
it depends how u count omfg
it can be 16 or 1, both are correct
6 replies
Yeah, if you count the wrong way you get 1.
5 replies
shut the fuck up
4 replies
Mate, how the fuck can both 16 and 1 be correct answers to the same question. If you do it the right way you get one answer.
3 replies
I dont give a shit about a fucking math and i read article where was said there are two metods to count. My metod and 2nd one
/closed
2 replies
"I read article..." Oh damn I didn't know you got your info from an article.
You can't have two different correct answers to the same question. That's just basic maths.
Lol you're pretty dumb
6 replies
Multiplication and division have the same priority. When you have both multiplication and division in one equation you start from left to right. Therefore, you divide 8 by 2 before multiplying by 4.
5 replies
3 replies
(4) = 4 mate
2 replies
1 reply
Actually, there is. If you have both multiplication and division in the same math equation you solve it from left to right. Therefore, you start with 8:2.
1 men
It's 16. People who say it's 1 learned maths in 1917
501 replies
wtf
1 ez
1 reply
bro the answer is 42069 wtf
1 reply
+1
1 reply
you just played yourself
As a M. Sc. Of Mathematics I think that there is no real point in asking this question men))
Because basically it is not a problem of algebra but just an unclear notation.
Conventially the expression "a:b" (where a /in /mathbb{R} and b /neq 0) is understood as /frac{a}{b}. Thus your problem would simplify to "what is the value of 4*4?"
isn't it 1?
8/ 2(2+2) =
8/ (4+4) =
8/8 =
1
the multiplication is a part of the parentheses, and so it's done before the division.
Edit: google.com/search?q=8+divided+by+2+(2%2B..
I guess not
1 reply
im losing braincells reading these retarded threads saying its 1
It's 16 and if you don't know it's 16 you're dumb
10 replies
9 replies
How are you actually this stupid
Pemdas
It's literally parenthesis then left to right in division multiplication. It simplifies down to 4 x 4
7 replies
6 replies
Yeah but you go left to right, dividing first, hence it is sixteen.
There can't be 2 answers to an equation that doesn't have variables.
3 replies
2 replies
Well he should've said to simplify it instead of putting "="
1 reply
Left to right. That's always the order between two things in the same step of the order of operations :)
3 replies
1 reply
gyazo.com/378aec32fa0d463dd86d97889edb31..
google on my side
Not just burgers. I can't believe how bad people are at math. It's obviously 16
Its 6
2 replies
You didn't use order of operations, my friend.
A bit late but 16
Order of operations, start w/ parethenses and add 2 and 2 to get 4.
Next you divide 8 by 2 to get 4.
Then take 4 and multiply it by 4 to get 16.
Easy
my math app says 16 ;D
calculator > human brain!
Its 16 you braindead retards.
8/2(2+2)
1.Brackets first 2+2 = 4
2. Now we have 8/2*4
3. Division and multiplication have the same priority. But division is first from left to right. So we will divide first.
4. 4*4= 16
Should just ban all the tards here lmao
Its 16
U Go from left to right
2+2=4
2*4=8
8:8=1
2 replies
people saying 16 are so dumb LUL
1 reply
Actually there is two valid methods
I mean there's no international standars
It just depends on the country
For example all north americans stands for 16 because thats the method they use in the USA
Thats the reason why there's such a controversy about It
I just cant remember the method names
youtube.com/watch?v=vaitsBUyiNQ np mens)) 😎😎
5 replies
4 replies
5 replies
no
8/2(2+2)
use the distributive property before solving.
8/(4+4)
simplify parentheses
8/(8)
solve
1
4 replies
3 replies
distributive property takes place outside of order of operations, allowing it to be used before anything else. This is an accurate solution to the equation.
2 replies
mindyourdecisions.com/blog/2019/07/31/wh..
if you lived in 1917 you might've been correct, but you americans probably do so thats why you think it's 1
1 reply
math.berkeley.edu/~gbergman/misc/numbers..
Well the math department at berkeley would actually disagree with us both. Apparently the equation is ambiguous and thus can not be solved.
1
omg is this shit still going xD
2010 Field Medal awarded guy said the only correct answer is : "this writing is ambiguous, correct it"
Why is everybody posting to this shit elementaryschool basic math thread?
Even 10 year old knows what's answer.
3 replies
everyone saying sth else than 16 should visit the 1st class again or go to a mental health doctor
wtf men((( it's so hard my turkish brain can't handle this (((
16
1 reply
/open
exec change your mind
/closed
2 replies
wtf is happening here 600replies+
16 obviously
1 reply
and whoever says something else, isnt very good at maths
16
its easy 8 / 2 * 4 = 1... wait :D
HLTV users third world education
Not enough info here. We need to know whether it's the quantity of (8:2) multiplied by (2 + 2) or if it's the quantity of 8 divided by the product of 2 * (2+2). If its the former, the answer is 16. If it's the latter the answer is 1
edit: I am not familiar with the (:) operator so I'm not sure if it has any special rules that apply when used
2 replies
1 reply
What was stupid about that? His explanation was clear as it was correct. It's why we use fractions more than the division sign
Well the equation is invalid so the real answer is "please correct it"
But it's 16 :)
0/8
Now playing
ESL TV
8310 viewers
Top streams
All(15)
Casters(9)
Streamers(4)
Organizers(2)
ESL TV
(8310)
gaules
(8192)
smooya
(854)
kNgV-
(639)
Cooper-
(504)
1pv
(374)
mch
(334)
JonY BoY
(251)
Apoka
(214)
Gamers Club
(191)
Jogando Junto
(190)
watchfulTV
(31)
River Plate
(74)
cutzmeretz
(24)
Northern Forces
(8)
