Thread has been deleted
Last comment
WW2 Russia
Other Real_Koczkodan 
Why tf Russia was spared after ww2 ?? world should have penalized the shit out of them just like it did in case of Germany. US should have used nukes to threaten Russia and demilitarize them avoiding whole cold war bullshit
2019-09-22 14:49
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
Coz in that time it was more like USA was spared
2019-09-22 14:51
28 replies
tf u talking about, they fought nazis
2019-09-22 14:55
27 replies
#3
rain | 
Norway Lassii
So did russia
2019-09-22 14:53
21 replies
XD? after nazis attacked them, first they colaborated
2019-09-22 14:54
20 replies
But ussr started fighting against nazis faster than us
2019-09-22 14:56
19 replies
so if I'm commiting murders with someone but then he did sth awful to ME and I help catch the guy I'm a hero right?
2019-09-22 15:01
18 replies
Defuk u talking about
2019-09-22 15:02
13 replies
im talking about your logic. it sucks
2019-09-22 15:03
12 replies
But america even worse , dont think so :/? P.S. google translate sucks 2
2019-09-22 15:04
U r retarded af
2019-09-22 15:06
usa was kinda thinking about aiding ger at some point, Im not sure your logic works
2019-09-22 15:23
9 replies
Cool, so Thinking of aiding an aggressor is worse than openly collaborating with one? Nice
2019-09-22 17:05
8 replies
You are collaborating with USA as we speak. They are aggressors in the whole world, world police.
2019-09-24 03:33
7 replies
you are disgusting. u both with moscovia strated ww2, you go through denazification etc and now defending ugly criminal moscovia. Why? Maybe that`s why? kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/why-german.. ukraineworld.org/articles/russian-aggres.. thetrumpet.com/18909-the-dangers-of-the-.. forbes.com/sites/danielmarkind/2019/08/1.. atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticis..
2019-09-24 04:59
4 replies
you are sucking usa dicks but moscow still fucked you in ass
2019-09-24 05:33
3 replies
keep watching gay porn, don`t stop
2019-09-24 05:51
btw I dont think u r average German, u rather moscvin fakeflagger or just mad moscvin imigrant in Germany who watch some shit like rt and believe every word. There a lot of such scoundrels there and not only there. They say they are great patrots of "maza" moscovia but when u ask them why dont they come back to their beloved homelannd they start being agressive bydlo as a rule. Hypocritical, cynical, schizoid, ignorant scoundrels
2019-09-24 05:58
1 reply
hahaha...nah nice try but im not ruski. u are just mad cuz they pissed on your whole life
2019-09-24 06:24
And yes, we are collaborating with US and not only with them but with all democratic states for which freedom, democracy, law, human rights, etc are not jusen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memora.. empty words. Also that`s th Reason So it`s US duty to help us. And I even not goona try to explain somthg about Ukraine`s fight against moscovia for its independece for many years to such ignorant/brainwashed or just to such damn cynic and hypocrite like u.
2019-09-24 05:06
If you genuinely think the US is causing the most trouble (while we have China and Russia in this world), I’m pretty scared for the future of Europe.
2019-09-24 08:24
u need to see a doctor and once you are healed go over the history from scratch and get your facts straight :D
2019-09-22 16:11
3 replies
+1.
2019-09-22 16:54
#170
 | 
China KoreanFan
+1
2019-09-22 19:14
LOL. Before Barbarossa you were just fine with Hitler, and why not when Stalin had the same idea with camps and killing his own people. And Russia finally released the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact documents this year so no point denying it :D theguardian.com/world/2019/aug/23/moscow..
2019-09-23 13:20
0/8 russia did too
2019-09-22 14:54
#fighted
2019-09-22 14:54
1 reply
my bad
2019-09-22 14:55
so did Norway.
2019-09-22 15:18
#83
 | 
Albania JonZherka
History is written by the victors
2019-09-22 16:08
Communists should have been destroyed, I agree. Now the whole Eastern Europe would have been developed and Europe would have been way better place to live than it is now.
2019-09-22 14:59
9 replies
+1
2019-09-22 15:01
it depends coz if we had our communists or our socialists we would be in same deep ass
2019-09-22 15:03
Without it , usa wouldnt share with money to the west europe
2019-09-22 15:08
3 replies
You mean the Marshall plan? I do not agree. Eastern Bloc countries were offered money as well by this plan but the Soviet Union interfered and didn't let those countries choose if they want those money or not.
2019-09-22 15:10
2 replies
+1 Only reason those countries didn't accept the money is because Stalin said he'd kick them from the Warsaw pact, right?
2019-09-23 02:26
1 reply
not from Warsaw pact, but rather he'd kick their ass so hard
2019-09-23 13:25
Eastern europe has always been shitty, excluding one or two countries.
2019-09-22 16:10
Easy to speak about history in conditionals lmao.
2019-09-22 17:23
+1 feelsbadman
2019-09-24 14:40
U must say thx to russians cuz they destroyed nazi. What is the point of this thread?
2019-09-22 15:05
33 replies
#20
 | 
Germany LYCRIs
Actually the us fucked us pretty bad.. ussr did nearly nothing besides not letting us conquer whole russia^^
2019-09-22 15:09
32 replies
USA with 80k soldiers? 0/8 men USA came when Russians were already near berlin
2019-09-22 15:19
9 replies
#30
 | 
Germany LYCRIs
Nah man, nazi germany got fucked in france first on d-day. Because of that they got fucked from all sites which lead to the germans getting fucked by the ussr aswell. Btw. nazi germany only lost in russia because of the winter and not because of the good soldiers from russia...
2019-09-22 15:22
5 replies
Tell me more USA did 1% of what Russia did and the only reason they start the D day was because they saw Russians were winning and didnt want to give the win only tp Russia. Thats all. Where they were begore 1944? Hiding because afraid
2019-09-22 15:24
4 replies
#41
 | 
Germany LYCRIs
No they hided coz there was no reason for them to fight germany. Germany fucked 1 boat with american people on it which lead to them joining the war...
2019-09-22 15:25
Flag checks out and delusional
2019-09-22 19:06
1 reply
Same with u mr neutral cause beta population and afraid
2019-09-22 20:44
Do you forget about the massive amount of resources and weaponry we gave them? They would've been absolutely run over by the Germans without it.
2019-09-23 08:26
Yes ussr did the hard work and us took credit for it
2019-09-22 15:23
vatnik, not moscvins ("russians") but soviet people first of all. And in second - they wouldn`t come at all or would come few years later (losing more few dozens of millions soviet people) without this en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lend-Lease
2019-09-22 17:51
1 reply
U stupid bitch. Go away already
2019-09-22 18:41
#31
 | 
United Kingdom ExCeL1234
Nah it was mainly Britain France and Russia fighting in Europe the US was having it's own little feud with Japan, and just ended up nuking two cities
2019-09-22 15:22
9 replies
#38
 | 
Germany LYCRIs
Well ofcourse US mainly fighted japan but if you actually look at the d-day, without the US it would have never happened and d-day was the start of the end of war. Also some decisions that hitler made were really dumb like stop fighting the uk in the air... (3 more weeks and the uk would have lost the air fight due to having no planes)
2019-09-22 15:24
8 replies
#44
 | 
United Kingdom ExCeL1234
Not really? The US actually helped with something in Europe doesn't mean it was all them. Also i think a lot of Hitlers decisions were pretty dumb
2019-09-22 15:27
2 replies
#58
 | 
Germany LYCRIs
The US gave the allies the power they needed, uk had big problems with troups and anything, so us still helped them even though they were still uk troups
2019-09-22 15:41
1 reply
#63
 | 
United Kingdom ExCeL1234
Ik i admitted they helped but they didn't solely win it
2019-09-22 15:50
"d-day was the start of the end of war." Historians disagree. Most historians say that there were 3 main events which caused the axis to lose: 1. The Battle of El Alamein, 2. The Battle of Midway, and 3. The Battle of Stalingrad. The 1st Resulted in the nazis retreat from Africa. The 2nd resulted in Japan's navy getting wrecked. And the 3th resulted in The USSR pushing Germany away and halting their advance
2019-09-22 15:45
the start of end of the war was when soviets crushed nazis is Stalingrad. learn real history, brainwashed kid. america did <10% of what soviets had to do
2019-09-22 17:58
2 replies
without lend-lease soviets would rather lose or more few dozens of milions of soviets would die. Also such like you always "forget" or just too brainwashed to konw how ww2 really started, reasons.
2019-09-22 18:13
1 reply
chto, ditya maidana, tebe nastolko nexyu delat, chto ti prishel syda i rasskazivaesh skazki 15 letnim evrogeiskim dolboebam, kotorie pro istoriy ww2 znayut tolko iz filmov tipo "vrag y vorot", can ono "bilo" na samom dele? ory, eshe i vidoe s ssanix xoxlovskix youtube canalov vstavlyaesh, kak istochnik pravdi :DDDD zhalko, chto v svoe vremya stalin vas vsex takix ybogix ne yspel dobit, ochen zhalko
2019-09-22 18:43
Even without air the Germans wouldnt have been able to take Britain and they weren't going to surrender..
2019-09-22 19:50
you really need to take some history lessons boy
2019-09-22 15:24
6 replies
#43
 | 
Germany LYCRIs
Not really tbh. Had it like 20 times in school and highschool.... but in the end idc about ww2 because it has been 70 years and I still wonder why I should feel bad about my country....
2019-09-22 15:26
5 replies
it's not about feeling bad, it is just about acknowlediging that usa did next to nothing when compared to udssr, most of german troups died while fighting udssr
2019-09-22 15:38
4 replies
#55
 | 
Germany LYCRIs
mainly they died because of the winter lul
2019-09-22 15:39
3 replies
well it is fine to not be interested in this part of history, but at least stay away from those kinds of discussion then It is true that Germans were superior 1:1, yet we still lost eh? that didnt happen fighting snowflakes
2019-09-22 15:41
2 replies
imagine seriously thinking that winter was the deciding factor lmao
2019-09-22 19:06
1 reply
It was a massive factor. Under supplied and I'll equipped to take on Russian forces in winter destroyed Germany. Along with the fact they were fighting on two other fronts. If they consolidated, their forces in the Ardennes and across the Mediterranean/North Africa, they would have been better off. Time would have told the story, but it didnt happen that way so it is what it is. If the U.S didn't land on D-Day or if they stuck to the Pacific war against Japan who knows what would have happened. To many what ifs.
2019-09-23 08:35
USA came when Russians were already near berlin
2019-09-22 15:30
#82
 | 
Albania JonZherka
Look at German deaths on the eastern front (USSR) opposed to the western and come back
2019-09-22 16:07
#89
HenryG | 
Europe BH5K
i dont like russia. but ussr killed and lost like twice as much as all the other allies combined. they did all the job. only significant thing us did was supplying UK.
2019-09-22 16:15
#110
 | 
Russia L0sk^^
lul if Hitler had captured the USSR the war would have ended for the Nazis and they occupation all world
2019-09-22 16:58
Now this some epic delusions right here
2019-09-23 09:05
there was no russia after 1917, you ment soviet union
2019-09-22 15:05
There was no Russia at that point
2019-09-22 15:14
3 replies
+1
2019-09-22 15:15
holy fuck kids i know that, its just simpler to call them that
2019-09-22 15:22
1 reply
#46
 | 
United Kingdom ExCeL1234
Plus there was Russia even if most references to it should be the soviet union, they didn't abolish the name
2019-09-22 15:29
And here we have a guy who plays video games and thinks cod WaW is the equivalent of a history book. The USA couldn't have beaten USSR, nor did they want to. They were "allies" after all
2019-09-22 15:15
15 replies
+1
2019-09-22 15:17
so help me understand it, why US couldnt fight Russians? they were ahead with nukes (even demonstrated it on Japan) this technology made them OP at the time
2019-09-22 15:20
13 replies
Ok, first of all, it is USSR, not Russia. Secondly, The USSR had more manpower and a larger army than the USA, also they were more experienced in warfare than the Americans. Third, The USSR was a HUGE nation and just like the Germans proved, it is almost impossible to conquer it. And even if they had some kind of a miracle and the USA occupied Moscow, They still wouldn't surrender they would still have 90% of their country left, but it wouldn't matter anyway because they wouldn't be able to get there. Fourth, after WW2 the USSR occupied they eastern european countries, so the USA would have to fight them also. Those are 3 simple points why The USA couldn't conquer The USSR and there are still more reasons, but i am too lazy to make this post any longer
2019-09-22 15:32
12 replies
And also, the nukes wouldn't matter much because it would only kill civilians
2019-09-22 15:33
2 replies
??????? you act like we gave a fuck lol
2019-09-24 03:26
1 reply
what are you talking about?
2019-09-24 18:11
#53
 | 
United Kingdom ExCeL1234
Also America and actually no one elsewanted to start another war or could start another war. The truth behind soviet expansion was unknown. Starting a war over it rather then trying to bargain and, for all the other allied countries, rebuilding, would be stupid. America's nuclear power, if anything, would make them feel safe they could come to an agreement and had a backup plan or the upper hand whatever
2019-09-22 15:38
1 reply
Agreed
2019-09-22 15:47
2 - quality >>>> quantity, one tank could probably overcome a whole city and army in medieval ages. Anytime there is new technology in war the gap in firepower between side that have one and side that doesnt is bigger. Nukes allowed to kill hundreds of thousands without any sacrifice. So few nukes would force Russia to surrender 3 - you don't need to take whole country, just the parts that matter, noone gives a fuck about empty, frozen land. Germans couldnt do it because they used man, sending one nuke on Moscow is pretty much conquering it. 4 - is exactly my point, they shouldnt be allowed to IMO Russia would be forced to give up
2019-09-22 15:53
5 replies
+ I dont mean allies SHOULD start a war, just threaten
2019-09-22 16:00
2 replies
But why? Why would they create tension just after the war ended?
2019-09-22 16:24
1 reply
Even when they wouldn't gain anything from it
2019-09-22 16:24
2- Yes, the US troops were trained better than the USSR soldiers, but the USSR soldiers had much more experience so America wouldn't lead them much in that category either. I don't understand your second point because of the way it is written. America would never want to nuke the USSR and even if they did, do you think Stalin would surrender? 3- Again, The USSR was such a big country, that they wouldn't surrender if they lost Moscow. "sending one nuke on Moscow is pretty much conquering it." No, no and also, no. 4- But they still DID occupy the eastern countries, so it doesn't matter if they should occupy them because they did occupy them.
2019-09-22 16:23
There is no chance to nuke Moscow, keep in mind that they already showed nukes and used it only with airplanes some years after war, so its mean meely range of attack and high chance to even lost nuke midair with no impact
2019-09-23 11:16
"ussr was nation" - ussr was prison of nations and moscovia still the same
2019-09-24 18:25
#29
 | 
United Kingdom ExCeL1234
What would Russia/ the USSR be penalized for? Being an allied force? Losing over 20 million lives? Being one of the most powerful countries in the world, but also country the US was not prepared to deal with (Mutually assured destruction). Also 'US should have used nukes to threaten Russia and demilitarize them avoiding whole cold war bullshit' What the fuck do you think started the cold war? Rock paper scissors? It was just constant tension and nuclear threats? How do you think they bargained?
2019-09-22 15:21
12 replies
love how you only find USSR apologists in western europe
2019-09-22 15:24
2 replies
#40
 | 
United Kingdom ExCeL1234
What?
2019-09-22 15:24
So proving why the USA wouldn't want to/couldn't fight the USSR is apologizing for them? Alright
2019-09-22 15:35
at the time there was no tension since only US got nukes. that is why demilitarization = Russians couldnt work on their own nukes = no threats from both sides = no cold war ??? why do I have to explain this shit
2019-09-22 15:28
3 replies
#50
 | 
United Kingdom ExCeL1234
The soviets wanted to expand into Eastern Europe. They still had a strong military: you can't just demilitarize them, especially as they are allies and do not want to start another war straight after. No one could afford it. If America wanted to demilitarize them, that would automatically create tension and a war itself. The nuclear aspect to it was just that America had nukes, so they could use that for bargaining and establishing itself as the dominant superpower, but it still wanted to work with everyone. Russia's motives were not even well known, we say all this in hindsight. you can't just demilitarize them, and my first point still stands. why do i have to explain this shit
2019-09-22 15:34
2 replies
+1
2019-09-22 15:36
1 reply
Atomic bombs = nuclear fission Nuclear Bombs = Nuclear fusion/fission No one had nukes in 1945. They didn't go Thermonuclear until the 50's
2019-09-23 08:41
#57
 | 
United Kingdom Nokzide
Your comment is completely null and void because Russia invaded Poland with Germany at the start of WWII in attempt of a land grab, and thus, jointly caused the start of WWII.
2019-09-22 15:40
4 replies
#62
 | 
United Kingdom ExCeL1234
They did not in any way jointly cause WW2? Sure they did, but many days after Germany invaded, so even if it was a land grab, it was Germany who invaded and conquered, and Germany who started the war anyway
2019-09-22 15:49
3 replies
#66
 | 
United Kingdom Nokzide
What would Russia/ the USSR be penalized for? '' war crimes maybe? they used military pressure to seize polish civilians and integrate them into russia against their wills and murdered soldiers in an already crippled poland. I always found it strange at the end of the war the americans and russians were celebrating together, but these war crimes were never paid for
2019-09-22 15:54
you should check secret points of the molotov-ribbentrop pact
2019-09-22 16:56
1 reply
#118
 | 
United Kingdom ExCeL1234
I know what that is, if anything it's the only reason to start further violence. But you can't penalise someone and start a war with a nation over a peaceful passive pact, it just showed how untrustworthy Stalin was. Coould have been different if Hitler didn't betray it and the soviets became allied
2019-09-22 17:02
0/8
2019-09-22 15:23
0/8
2019-09-22 15:25
#56
 | 
Russia RogueDecay
why would you have such a question in your head first of all? Hate is never an answer 15yo brother.
2019-09-22 15:40
3 replies
i dont hate, just think its unfair to punish one aggressor and not the other. it doesnt matter today
2019-09-22 15:58
2 replies
#79
 | 
Russia RogueDecay
aggressor? who put that bullcrap in your head?
2019-09-22 16:05
1 reply
read Icebreaker by Suvorov, vatnik, and learn real history, not only about ww2.
2019-09-23 03:39
Polish education checks out lul
2019-09-22 15:57
#74
 | 
United States DiabIo
imagine being able to say that year later
2019-09-22 16:02
#75
 | 
Georgia Broozman
USSR, not Russia
2019-09-22 16:03
1 reply
all orders were from moscow so its about moscovia, stop freaking around
2019-09-22 17:07
#94
 | 
Russia dUUUt
good bait almost got me
2019-09-22 16:25
This is the most retarded thread I've seen on HLTV, well done OP
2019-09-22 16:26
#106
 | 
Russia L0sk^^
mb ussr? punish for what??
2019-09-22 16:56
though fromally it was ussr but in fact you are right ofc - moscovia must be punished. All who say shit about "moscovia won nazi" before allies help are comlete brainwashed/ignorant or just paid bots/vatniks.
2019-09-22 16:59
2 replies
#114
 | 
Russia L0sk^^
moscovia never had
2019-09-22 17:01
Everyone who disagree with you is brainwashed. Of course, you are the only one in the whole world who is telling the truth, and your point of view is infallible. It is just a sarcasm. I don't think than someone in their right mind takes your delirium seriously.
2019-09-23 08:29
the reason why modern moscovia continue to make crimes against international law, incl war crimes and crimes against humanity is exactly becasue it was not convicted for its crimes starting 1917 - first of all Holodomor and many many other horrible crimes.
2019-09-22 17:01
2019-09-22 17:03
1 reply
#129
 | 
Russia galkow
AHAHAHHAHAHHAAH, HELLO MAZEPA, I WAITING YOU 3 HOURS
2019-09-22 17:10
#128
 | 
Russia galkow
WW2 and Russia, pick one lul.
2019-09-22 17:11
the worst thing is moscvin propaganda brainwashed millions of people all over the world.
2019-09-22 17:52
4 replies
Youre so obsessed with Russia, I begin to think that you love them.
2019-09-22 18:04
3 replies
moscovia is not Russia and never was, #147
2019-09-22 18:17
1 reply
#173
 | 
Ukraine ruskitop
lulkraina isnt real country soooo
2019-09-22 19:25
It called "stockholm syndrome"
2019-09-23 08:32
UK/USA had plans to invade SSSR but it was too risky and no one wanted another war after WW2. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Unthinka..
2019-09-22 19:27
Spared? From who? What did they do that they were spared from? Why would the US threaten Russia with nukes? It's not like they dropped them on Japan for the fun of it, it was to pressure Japan into surrendering. Just because the US didn't agree with the USSR politically doesn't mean they have to threaten to nuke them, that's a bit extreme.
2019-09-23 02:37
#193
 | 
Australia Googgy
Probably because russia basically won the war by themselves and had like a 6:1 ratio of men in europe at the end of the war
2019-09-23 04:24
9 replies
complete bullshit
2019-09-23 04:35
4 replies
#196
 | 
Australia Googgy
mate all you do is shit talk russia on here, it's actual sad please go outside mens)))
2019-09-23 04:52
3 replies
Don't be clueless Anzac.
2019-09-23 09:00
just back off
2019-09-23 10:15
Aussie clueless
2019-09-24 03:37
BY THEMSELVES?? They would've lost by themselves.
2019-09-23 08:37
3 replies
#220
 | 
Australia Googgy
without the lend lease program yeah probs, but by the time the allies actually landed the war was already pretty much won
2019-09-23 09:19
2 replies
I dont wanna repeat myself again and agian. If you Really wanna figure out don`t be lazy to check my comments here carefully.
2019-09-23 10:20
1 reply
#241
 | 
Australia Googgy
no
2019-09-23 13:08
"What did they do that they were spared from?" woof, if you dont wanna scroll this thread carefully then try to google hard to learn "what they did". You can start from youtube if you don`t wanna read. Here is good link for the start youtube.com/watch?v=zZTA8xc4_8w&t=39s
2019-09-23 04:34
2 replies
Keep us entertained, clown
2019-09-23 08:37
1 reply
nt rusky
2019-09-23 08:42
#216
Dosia | 
Russia Rapu
I hope that this "trolling", I don't want to believe that there are so foolish people in this world :(
2019-09-23 08:43
#221
 | 
Finland LARSONi
Because they won the war and no one cares because of that, and a lot of people did not know because the winners write history. If Germany would have won, then the Soviet Union would had to pay for their actions but not Germany. Basically thats how wars work.
2019-09-23 09:26
5 replies
lie
2019-09-23 10:16
1. Neither Germany payed anything
2019-09-23 10:56
3 replies
oh really? what about en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denazification ?
2019-09-23 12:55
1 reply
Pls learn to read before you answer
2019-09-23 13:03
#253
 | 
Finland LARSONi
By pay, I did not mean money
2019-09-23 17:47
the USSR lost over 25 million men in ww2, the us lost 418.000. The USSR had way more reason to completely fuck nazi germany.
2019-09-23 10:22
6 replies
ussr both with 3rd reich started ww2 and were allies for 2 years. I believe oneday people saying such shit like u will be banned at least for couple days on normal decent civilized sites.
2019-09-23 12:53
5 replies
are you mentally ill? sure they where "allies" but there where not buddies, they had a piece agreement you imbecile. they still lost over 25 million men i WW2.
2019-09-24 10:10
4 replies
No need to call anyone names. Thank you.
2019-09-24 10:23
3 replies
sry :/ though he called me a shit
2019-09-24 11:44
2 replies
The user referred to what you were stating as 'shit'. Also even if you were insulted by acting in the same way you expose yourself to be judged, and ultimately punished, by the same set of rules. Please remember it in the future. Thank you in advance.
2019-09-24 12:20
1 reply
i will remember that in the future
2019-09-24 14:33
Really funny how kiddos inside Hltv think wars are like Cs.Go
2019-09-23 10:57
MacArthur laid out a plan during the Korean war to drop Atomic bombs on North Korea, China and Russia and our idiot president fired him. Eventually the 3 big dogs will have to fight and from what I have seen I would bet 100% the loser will launch every nuke they have at the end. So basically the minute WW III starts you know it's over unless you live in a bunker with enough food, oxygen and water for 10-20 years which only the 1% will have.
2019-09-23 11:00
#233
 | 
Russia neologin
1. Legally, this was not possible. Allies of World War II was created, thanks to which the USSR was able to win key battles in its territory. 2. Physically, the USSR had more losses. 3. The Molotov-Rebentrop Pact was a mistake, because Stalin was not ready for a war with Hitler, he wanted to weaken the strongest European countries. Europe was burning. If Hitler had not attacked the USSR, then Stalin would have sent troops after. 4. After the war, an arms race began in the USSR. Because this is the most important time to establish your regime in world politics. Accordingly, the question arises: what would the world be like if Hitler had established his rules as a winner? Use your brain sometimes, not your heart.
2019-09-23 11:20
3 replies
Lie! koba was gonna "free" Europe from "fascists" , come as liberator and in fact to occupy Europe and to embody will of uljanov - to set of fire world communist revolution. But hitler learned about his plans and was forced to make preventive blow.
2019-09-23 13:02
1 reply
#251
 | 
Russia neologin
Proofs? Otherwise, it's all fairytales for fools. Attacking or "liberating" Europe after losing the war to the Finns is obviously a bad idea. Europe would never have adopted a different regime, nor had it adopted fascism.
2019-09-23 14:59
"what would you rather have? A nice beautiful American run city like West Berlin full of freedom and enterprise? Or a shithole like East Berlin where families are stripped away, people are taken by the secret police, and border guards watch you with machine guns" When you have to force your population from defecting because they fear for their life, are you the good guy? fuck I wonder which one was the better choice? Take a look at west europe vs east. What the US could've done for eastern europe would've changed millions of lives. But your people just exploited and oppressed them.
2019-09-24 03:42
#234
 | 
Europe HTKk
0 iq
2019-09-23 11:24
Talking about history in HLTV omegalul
2019-09-24 08:32
Lul
2019-09-24 15:16
Meta
3.48
Bravos
1.29
Havan Liberty
1.02
9z
13.50
MAD Lions
2.48
Virtus.pro
1.56
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.