Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Shortest ERA in cs:go history "SERA"
 | 
Algeria abdodz45 
Liquid Clown9 Na'vi Or should we really consider them "ERAS"? well lets call it "SERA" AKA short era
2019-09-29 15:45
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
#1
NAF | 
United States skzl_ 
short era vs no era mr algeria
2019-09-29 15:46
#4
 | 
Algeria abdodz45 
I take my word back, chokuid didn't have era at all
2019-09-29 15:47
#10
NAF | 
United States skzl_ 
NAF 1 ERA ALGERIA 0 ERA
2019-09-29 15:49
LOL
2019-09-29 15:55
It is actually still tied 0-0 in both SERA and ERA....
2019-09-29 16:09
NAF 0 ERA ALGERIA 0 ERA
2019-09-30 05:58
#57
 | 
Bulgaria overflowww 
did you sell your wife for internet mr algeria
2019-09-29 16:55
#154
 | 
Algeria abdodz45 
yeah mr.russia
2019-09-29 19:52
#159
 | 
United States CallMeTaco 
Brb calling Trump to drone strike your shit shack in your shithole country
2019-09-29 20:03
#160
 | 
Algeria abdodz45 
better call biden 'cuz trump will be out of office next 2020
2019-09-29 20:04
ur mom died
2019-09-30 06:40
#193
 | 
Algeria abdodz45 
Ok Communist
2019-09-30 11:17
How feeble are you to take his thread as a personal tack
2019-09-29 17:21
#2
Jame | 
Netherlands KarakurtJ 
all those teams didnt even have an era
2019-09-29 15:46
#6
 | 
Algeria abdodz45 
at least they had SERAS
2019-09-29 15:47
#7
Jame | 
Netherlands KarakurtJ 
nope
2019-09-29 15:48
#36
 | 
Brazil NiceBrazilian 
nope
2019-09-29 16:20
top trying to make sera a thing stfu
2019-09-29 16:45
#175
 | 
United States JacobSick954 
expected from astralis fan
2019-09-30 06:12
#51
 | 
Algeria abdodz45 
2019-09-29 16:43
None of these teams even had eras lmfao.
2019-09-29 15:46
#5
 | 
Algeria abdodz45 
then make it SERA
2019-09-29 15:47
#37
 | 
Brazil NiceBrazilian 
nope
2019-09-29 16:20
Eras can't be short by definition Learn English
2019-09-29 15:48
+1
2019-09-29 15:49
#19
 | 
Russia Hellyer 
+1
2019-09-29 16:00
#38
 | 
Brazil NiceBrazilian 
+1
2019-09-29 16:20
#50
 | 
Algeria abdodz45 
learn wot fokin m8
2019-09-29 16:42
"a period of time marked by distinctive character, events, etc." Such as Liquid winning 6 events, making 7 finals, 7 top 4's and a 22 series win-streak for 4 months. Definitely a short era
2019-09-29 17:24
#93
 | 
United States 10YearBansRUs 
a long and distinct period of history is a better definition tbh
2019-09-29 17:38
The bronze age, stone age, iron age, steam powered train era, Nazi Germany. Long is completely arbitrary when it comes to defining an era. dictionary.com/browse/era I think those are much better definitions
2019-09-29 17:52
any eras you know of that last a couple months?
2019-09-29 17:56
That's why its arbitrary and context matters other than the length, especially with cs lol
2019-09-29 18:24
So the context is in CSGO irrespective of other definitions: every era has been over a year, had a major, had the community agree on the whole it exists and much more ofc. Liquid has literally none of that.
2019-09-29 18:33
SK era was a few months, fnatic era wasn't a year. Astralis era was exactly 1 year and called an era way before it reached a year
2019-09-29 18:36
SK never had an era Fnatic era was over a year? Late 2014-early 2016/late 2015 depending on who u ask
2019-09-29 18:36
Which is why its completely subjective, arbitrary and depends on context reddit.com/r/GlobalOffensive/comments/d6..
2019-09-29 18:37
You have to be brain dead to look at that chart and not see 3 team standing out. NiP Fnatic Astralis What do they all have in common, tournament wins, majors and length of time
2019-09-29 18:40
Dont know what else to tell you at this point. You're wrong with your subjective decision of what makes an era
2019-09-29 18:41
K im not falling for this bait or retardation cos either way im wasting my time xD
2019-09-29 18:41
Sorry, but not even close to an era
2019-09-30 05:59
#199
 | 
Algeria abdodz45 
and that's why we're talking about SERA
2019-10-01 16:50
I'd call it the Liquid summer rather than Liquid era. The other two teams you mention never had an era
2019-09-29 15:48
#13
 | 
Other khorkalba 
Wasn't even the Liquid summer to be honest. When people look back at the summer of 2019, they'll remember it as the "Blastralis" period where the greatest team of all time almost destroyed their own legacy inbetween major wins.
2019-09-29 15:53
People still talk about C9's 2015 summer run from time to time and that was a lot less impressive than Liquid's mini-era.
2019-09-29 16:15
#61
 | 
Other khorkalba 
They talk about Gambit's major win too. Just because a team's run is memorable and has cool storylines doesn't mean it's an era or a mini-era. An era is supposed to be the next step beyond just being the #1 team for the year. It implies dominance to a point where the 2nd best team wasn't even close. Liquid cannot possibly achieve that in 2019 when Astralis have won both majors.
2019-09-29 17:17
Please tell me you are bating That C9 didnt even win a single relevant event in the entirity of 2015.Their huuuge summer run was 3 2nd places in a row,thats it.That was still impressive but its almost nothing compared to Liquid's run.
2019-09-29 18:07
That's pretty much what i said lol
2019-09-29 19:58
Oh sorry,I misread your comment I thought you said it was a lot more impressive(i dunno what i was looking at lol)
2019-09-29 21:38
#188
device | 
Denmark bebm 
stop this madness during the summer of 2019 liquid was the better team, they beat astralis in a bo3 the only time they faced, its not liquids fault ast skipped the rest, but when they did attend, they either lost early or lost to liquid
2019-09-30 07:19
There were only 3 eras...
2019-09-29 15:50
#16
zonic | 
Denmark Phoey 
Fnatic, LG/SK & Astralis Nip took advantage of everyone being irrelevant
2019-09-29 15:56
So? They had the longest era even
2019-09-29 15:59
#58
zonic | 
Denmark Phoey 
They did not lol. 1 Major. In my opinion you need at least back 2 back majors to have a era.
2019-09-29 17:05
Nip dominated an entire year before the first major was held. They got to the final in the first 5 majors. Sure, they messed up by only winning 1, but they were still the dominant team from late 2012 until late 2014
2019-09-29 17:19
exactly. If nip hadnt an era, nobody had one
2019-09-29 17:35
Because there wasn't a major back then. If there was, NIP would have won at least 2 majors in a row.
2019-09-29 17:59
1. VP NIP FNATIC 2 SK VP FNATIC 3.ASTRALIS
2019-09-29 16:00
VP, NiP, SK and VP over Astralis? hahahaha
2019-09-29 16:07
1 - FIRST ERA 2 - SECOND ERA 3 - THIRD ERA ITS NOT A RANKING
2019-09-29 17:21
when did VP have an era??? They even had 2 ??? again: hahahahahaha
2019-09-29 17:19
typo
2019-09-29 17:20
typo twice? When did VP have a single era??
2019-09-29 17:20
0/8
2019-09-29 17:21
You cant even tell me when they had an era :D:D:D clearly trolling or just newfag
2019-09-29 17:21
astralis won 4 majors, fnatic 3, vp won 1 major so vp era > all. polish logic
2019-09-29 18:08
use liquipedia
2019-09-29 18:14
pls link me to the liquipedia that says they had an era. Cant be that hard? Unless it never happened and u have no clue what ur talking about ofc
2019-09-29 19:30
#29
Albania dhg1 
VP ? not sure if trolling or just stupid
2019-09-29 16:11
+1
2019-09-29 16:14
Lg/sk era...lul
2019-09-29 17:08
Just because Nip didnt play against as good opponents like Astralis or fnatic doesnt mean they didnt have an era.They could only beat what was in front of them,and they did it with dominance,you cant just throw that out of the window because "muh opponents not bad"
2019-09-29 18:10
#129
zonic | 
Denmark Phoey 
They could’nt even hold their “era” with back to back majors. Not a era to me.
2019-09-29 18:18
For Nip its different with majors,they didnt even have as many opportunities as any other team after since majors only started in late 2013 when Nip wasnt even as dominant anymore. I count their era only in like 2013 when they won literally everything except the latter part of the year.That is still a year's worth of incredible dominance(87-0),even though the other teams werent as great its still there.
2019-09-29 18:28
Lmao, SK only won the majors and 1 or 2 other tourneys, nothing else. They didn't have an era whatsoever
2019-09-30 06:03
Navi?? XDDD WHEN
2019-09-29 15:55
cloud 9 and navi wtf
2019-09-29 15:57
gambit era - one week
2019-09-29 16:00
none of those teams had eras 0/8
2019-09-29 16:02
nt plastic
2019-09-29 16:03
neither had an era
2019-09-29 16:04
Na'Vi had an era? Era of being a top3 team maybe
2019-09-29 16:05
#34
zews | 
Brazil faustarpp 
It's heartbreaking s1mple never won a major, tbh.
2019-09-29 16:17
#54
 | 
Algeria abdodz45 
youtube.com/watch?v=3_5NUNjnGaY navi were in first spot but for a month or less
2019-09-29 16:45
#1 =/ era Liquid didn't have an era either
2019-09-29 17:17
#72
 | 
South Africa nimmaJ 
Yeah they do, completely dominated the first half of 2018 + grand slam and a 700 point gap, no one was close to them.
2019-09-29 17:21
Dude do you realise what era means? Era = extended period of time, Liquid were dominant for 3 months :D
2019-09-29 17:21
#84
 | 
South Africa nimmaJ 
#80
2019-09-29 17:25
#28
 | 
Australia liazz_top2 
SK
2019-09-29 16:10
#39
zews | 
Brazil faustarpp 
I'm biased, but: >two majors >making to playoffs almost every tournment they attended >losing almost every time at the semi-finals or finals >winning a bunch of tier 1 tournments I just think so much was lost by the fact that they can't just leave the US and risk losing their visas (therefore losing tournaments in the US, including possible majors). US should be excluded from consideration when the matter is holding tournaments.
2019-09-29 16:20
#41
 | 
Brazil Totss 
I cant stand with this bullshit, two years it's not enough for ya??
2019-09-29 16:21
#66
 | 
South Africa nimmaJ 
What two years? They changed lineups. I agree that the 2 majors team had an era but and era is defined by a 5 man roster. You can't make changes and continue your era
2019-09-29 17:20
#165
 | 
Brazil Totss 
Bla bla bla, the core was the same dude, c'mon, stop to crying
2019-09-30 05:30
#182
 | 
South Africa nimmaJ 
That's literally not how eras work. Has to be the same 5 man lineup, they wouldn't make changes in the first place if that lineup was still dominant and having an era. No crying, just logic but Brazilians confuse that all the time
2019-09-30 06:31
2 years LMAO. holy mother of god i love deluded brasilians that think that lg/sk had an era
2019-09-29 17:52
#167
 | 
Brazil Totss 
Tell me more about the scene of your country baby boy
2019-09-30 05:34
no scene at all...atleast im not as deluded as you baby boy
2019-09-30 05:54
#42
zews | 
Brazil faustarpp 
They had an era, but Astralis is just so fucking dominant that they even make FNATIC look weak, it's ridiculous.
2019-09-29 16:21
Had an era
2019-09-29 17:18
being the top 1 team for a few weeks isn't an era
2019-09-29 16:13
Do you have a concept of time
2019-09-30 06:09
do you?
2019-09-30 13:18
short era is no era basically
2019-09-29 16:17
#47
 | 
Serbia Niddzaa 
Short dick is no dick basically
2019-09-29 16:22
#35
 | 
France J0riS 
N♿rth 3 days era LUL
2019-09-29 16:19
On a DH, MVP of wich was won by MSL?
2019-09-29 16:22
#178
 | 
United States gtmaniacmda 
MY FAVORITE ERA
2019-09-30 06:20
#40
 | 
Ukraine KICK_ZEUS 
godsent
2019-09-29 16:20
North one
2019-09-29 16:22
#45
NiKo | 
United Kingdom ExCeL1234 
None of these teams had an era, only Liquid is debatable. And i aint calling them Sera's, because that would still be an era. Seriously, when did cloud9 or NaVi ever do anything close to dominance? 0/8
2019-09-29 16:22
#49
 | 
Russia undeadc00l 
no major no era
2019-09-29 16:24
learn what mean ERA first !
2019-09-29 16:44
#55
 | 
Algeria abdodz45 
Sorry CERQ
2019-09-29 16:46
Unfortunately no Era, astralis destroyed it
2019-09-29 16:49
Cry is free s0mple cucks AXAXAAXAXAAxAXAXAXAXAXAXAAXAXA
2019-09-29 17:20
#64
 | 
Sweden Lagge15 
Na'Vi and Cloud?
2019-09-29 17:18
#70
ZywOo | 
Denmark Shremble 
C9 era? NaVi era? Brain-damaged?
2019-09-29 17:20
#74
snatchie | 
Poland JKG 
Liquid was lucky that Astralis was dodging tournaments Otherwise they would win maybe 2 trophies not 6 So no era Clown9 had 1 lucky tournament , is that really what you call an era ?! Navi ? Era ? When exactly? Only teams that had an era were: NIP 2012-2014 Fnatic 2015-2016 Lg/Sk 2016-2017 Astralis 2018-2019
2019-09-29 17:21
#83
 | 
South Africa nimmaJ 
Eras arent defined by what other teams are doing, its defined by your achievements. I could make cases for all of those saying that they didnt have proper competition or teams werent attending all the tournaments. Point is your argument is complete speculation and has no objective backing. You have no idea who would have won those tournaments but Liquid did and they achieved a Grand Slam while doing it
2019-09-29 17:25
#86
snatchie | 
Poland JKG 
yeah OK you're right Liquid is debatable, but anyway few months is not an era But how can you say that Cloud9 or Navi had an era ?
2019-09-29 17:31
#87
 | 
South Africa nimmaJ 
I never said c9 or Navi had an era and like I said in #80 the period that Liquid dominated was significant. People dont realize how long 6 months is in esports
2019-09-29 17:33
#88
snatchie | 
Poland JKG 
I didnt "feel" that dominance from Liquid in these tournaments Like I felt with Fnatic or Astralis But like I said Liquid is debatable
2019-09-29 17:34
#92
 | 
South Africa nimmaJ 
Dont really care what you felt, look at the metrics
2019-09-29 17:38
#94
snatchie | 
Poland JKG 
Yeah metrics xDD Delusional fanboy They had an "era" for 3 months not half a year (April-July) and they played vs Astralis once Great metrics
2019-09-29 17:40
#180
 | 
United States xxpowmanxx 
Ah yes winning almost all matches 2-0 with fairly low round drops is not dominating them.
2019-09-30 06:21
"Lg/Sk 2016-2017" just rofl...never had an era
2019-09-29 17:52
#109
snatchie | 
Poland JKG 
They never had an era ??? From What I remember 10 Trophies in 2017 2 majors in 2016 + few tournament wins + multiple finals/semis in both years How is that not an era ?
2019-09-29 17:59
8 not 10 They had a few months of underperformance from after the PGL Krakow Major. The 2016 period does not connect to the 2017 period. There was over half a year in which they didn't win anything.
2019-09-29 18:06
#117
snatchie | 
Poland JKG 
"8 not 10" Ok, now show me team that won that many tier 1 tournaments in one year SK had era in 2016 (from 1st major win to like end of august) And second one in 2017 You could say that Astralis didnt have an era only because they played bad in like 4 months after Katowice win It's not how it works
2019-09-29 18:08
cs_summit was not a tier 1 event DreamHack Open Summer wasn't a tier 1 event either And yes, if Astralis starts winning everything now, I would not consider Astralis to have an uninterrupted era
2019-09-29 18:14
+1
2019-09-29 18:16
ok i will try it this way... they attended 14 big events in 2016. once again...!!!14!!! and how many of them did they win? 2...once again...!!!2!!!. their winning streak in big events that year? surpirse surprise: 1. now lets take a look at 2017.16 big events attended, 6 won, 2 tournaments winning streak. tournaments out of top4(semifinals)? 5 with results like 11-12, 9-11 and 9-12. in WHICH freaking universe is this an era? bcs of 2 majors? only completely deluded and biased fanboy can believe that they actually had an era and especially in 2016
2019-09-29 18:08
#120
snatchie | 
Poland JKG 
Not worth discussing, you're SK hater #117 and that's all I will say I don't care if they attended 1000 or 10 torunaments, they won 8! tier 1 tournaments in 2017 and only Astralis could repeat that If Liquid had an era this year, then SK also had it in 2016
2019-09-29 18:10
"Not worth discussing, you're SK hater" stating pure FACTS=being hater nowadays? GREAT argument "#117 and that's all I will say" you said literally nothing there "I don't care if they attended 1000 or 10 torunaments, they won 8! tier 1 tournaments in 2017 and only Astralis could repeat that" ok now i can see that you are just completely deluded bcs it is imporant. if you arent able to win even 3 tournaments in a row and you arent able to win even 50% of tournaments that you attend, you dont have an era...again: 2 OUT OF 14 TOURNAMENTS:DDDDDDDDD jesus christ "If Liquid had an era this year, then SK also had it in 2016" i never said that liquid had an era so no idea why did you even mention that lmao. you rly are desperate with this "argument"
2019-09-29 18:16
#126
snatchie | 
Poland JKG 
""If Liquid had an era this year, then SK also had it in 2016" i never said that liquid had an era so no idea why did you even mention that lmao. you rly are desperate with this "argument"" Shortest ERA in cs:go history "SERA" Liquid Clown9 Na'vi Or should we really consider them "ERAS"? well lets call it "SERA" AKA short era Do you even know what are we talking about here ?
2019-09-29 18:16
am i author of this topic? maybe take a look...im not and this topic doesnt change ANYTHING about sk and an era
2019-09-29 18:19
#127
snatchie | 
Poland JKG 
And you're one of these idiots that are really hard to discuss with For you only your arguments make any sense, and everyone is idiot So it's a waste of time IMO they had an era, and they were on another level for a very long time
2019-09-29 18:18
"And you're one of these idiots that are really hard to discuss with" i stated pure FACTS. i understand that its hard to understand them with your tiny brain but its not my fault. i couldnt care less about your opinion based on nothing
2019-09-29 18:19
#132
snatchie | 
Poland JKG 
Like I said you're one of these idiots that are really hard to discuss with Your arguments ARE PURE FACTS and others are some stupid bullshit xD Bye
2019-09-29 18:20
"Like I said you're one of these idiots that are really hard to discuss with" because im able to look at FACTS and you have only your deluded opinion based on nothing? ofc that its hard for you and its understandable
2019-09-29 18:21
Ur a minda if you think sk or liquid don’t have an era
2019-09-30 06:14
124
2019-09-30 06:16
"you're one of these idiots" "For you only your arguments make any sense, and everyone is idiot" Sounds more like you're talking about yourself
2019-09-29 18:32
#145
snatchie | 
Poland JKG 
I am done with this discussion so stop replying There is no way I will convince any of you two idiots that SK had an Era A big one So I am done :) Bye
2019-09-29 18:35
Exactly, because they didn't have an era. They simply weren't dominant for the entire year. By your logic the Liquid era is still going on.
2019-09-29 18:36
Someone needs to slap you if you think liquid or sk haven’t had eras
2019-09-30 07:10
Why? Both of them quite clearly had no era
2019-09-30 13:51
"LG/SK 2016-2017" lol You could make an argument for a SERA in 2016, but the two periods of good performance were not connected to each other
2019-09-29 17:57
#110
snatchie | 
Poland JKG 
#109
2019-09-29 17:59
Liquid never had an era, they had a summer run. That's it. Like a roided up 2015 C9
2019-09-29 17:21
#190
 | 
Estonia sux3ss 
Roided up lol
2019-09-30 07:27
north era 2 days
2019-09-29 17:22
#80
 | 
South Africa nimmaJ 
Liquid clearly had an era. 6 months is a huge period of time in CSGO history. Literally 1/10 of its pro existence
2019-09-29 17:22
6 months? Where has your 6 months gone The 2 last majors, the ones Astralis won, are only 6 months apart alone... Liquid won 5 events in a row between June and July. Sydney ended in May. Not sure where you find 6 months, or an era. It's a run as #1 team, not an era
2019-09-29 17:34
#91
 | 
South Africa nimmaJ 
March april may june July August. Nt. Liquid haters are so rampant in EU now
2019-09-29 17:37
March? WTF, No April? Yeah No May? Barely, just won their 1st event then lost cs summit June? Yes July? Yes August? 0 events, depends whether you count their end at the major or their last win. Thats 2-4 months by my count chief
2019-09-29 17:40
#96
 | 
South Africa nimmaJ 
Wtf no because you say so?
2019-09-29 17:41
What did they do in March or April?
2019-09-29 17:41
#99
 | 
South Africa nimmaJ 
2 finals + won sydney
2019-09-29 17:43
sydney ended in may + what are we counting blast pro finals as era starters now 1st one they lost to astralis who were still on their era, makes 0 sense to call that liquids era Liquid run is from June to the SL major, from sydney if charitable
2019-09-29 17:47
#164
 | 
South Africa nimmaJ 
Yes? Eras build up into success and achieving the grand Slam (a feat that when announced many said would be impossible) in 63 days 4 straight tournaments is absolutely era defining.
2019-09-29 22:18
hltv.org/results?team=5973 The results speak for themselves, March, April and May they lost tournaments, though reaching finals which is good. *Sydney win* June to July they started winning tournaments, 5 in a row I believe. August they only played the Major where you should know the results of that. If anything they looked dominant June to July
2019-09-29 17:44
#183
 | 
South Africa nimmaJ 
#164
2019-09-30 06:33
no
2019-09-29 17:58
#81
NiKo | 
Poland NiKo_TOP1 
VIRTUS PRO!1!!!! oh wait.. :(
2019-09-29 17:23
Liquid hasnt have an era, not even a shortest one.
2019-09-29 17:26
#97
 | 
United States Globebuster 
we are still in the NA era btw
2019-09-29 17:41
2 months end of may till end of july
2019-09-29 18:09
#161
 | 
United States Globebuster 
o rly?? 😎😎😎😎
2019-09-29 21:16
0/8
2019-09-29 17:56
#113
 | 
Sweden Trkmag 
No eras there wtf
2019-09-29 18:07
2 months era? WTF
2019-09-29 18:08
#131
 | 
United States LoganPaulFan 
liquid no ear c9 had era also gambit
2019-09-29 18:20
yes
2019-09-29 18:21
#133
 | 
United States jay_320 
Team Liquid had an amazing "run". One of the best of all time. It was too short to be an era but as a run it was amoungst the most dominant if not the most dominant in modern CS. That's just facts and EU haters and NA lovers should be able to live with that. This core of NAF, Elige and Twistzz aren't done because of two tournament losses. They lost like 10 finals last year. In perspective this team is in TSM and soon they will bloom into Astralis if they follow a similar course. Check their ages. The TL era may be yet to come. What they and EG to a lesser extent have done is put NA on the map as a region that's going to win Tier 1 tournaments and win them consistently. That ALONE is the best contribution an NA team has ever given to fans in the US and Canada. C9's major win doesn't come close to what these guys have done and what they will do going into the next two or three years.
2019-09-29 18:22
#157
 | 
Algeria abdodz45 
"EU haters and NA lovers" ? basically the same thing
2019-09-29 19:58
#158
 | 
United States jay_320 
Yeah that was dumb, meant EU lovers and NA lovers.
2019-09-29 20:00
#189
 | 
Estonia sux3ss 
Tho fnatic's and astralis' dominance will be remembered forever in csgo and liquid meeeeh
2019-09-30 07:26
#203
 | 
United States jay_320 
The best NA team of all time who tied the best team of all time's tournaments in a row record won't be remembered? okkkkk
2019-10-03 16:36
#204
 | 
Estonia sux3ss 
Honestly I only will remember iBUYPOWER and Cloud9 2015
2019-10-03 19:46
#134
shox | 
Slovakia TreeMan 
Ence wins this one lol
2019-09-29 18:21
Na'Vi was never close to having an era Its absolutely ridicoulus to even bring Clown9 into this discussion Liquid was close to having an era but they needed the major for that(though its not unreasonable to think they had an era,its on a razor's edge)
2019-09-29 18:25
#139
 | 
United Kingdom Aqishimaaa 
liquid never had an era
2019-09-29 18:26
#143
gas | 
Austria Phil_1337 
2019-09-29 18:34
TL and Faze had baby "eras" Mibr, fnatic and astralis had the only real ones
2019-09-29 19:16
#155
 | 
Algeria abdodz45 
baby eras hahaha I like this one
2019-09-29 19:54
Have C9 finished their era yet?
2019-09-29 21:18
all three never had an era
2019-09-30 05:31
>Na'Vi >Era pick one
2019-09-30 05:38
#173
 | 
Finland autism@exe 
Nrg/eg Gonna be 3month
2019-09-30 06:05
they dont even have an era and you are already talking about it ending jesus christ
2019-09-30 06:21
#200
 | 
Finland autism@exe 
what? when they get there era it will last 3month. and that wont be an era. jesus man
2019-10-02 14:38
#201
 | 
Finland autism@exe 
"gonna be"
2019-10-02 14:38
they wont have an era
2019-10-02 16:15
Yes shortest era
2019-09-30 06:30
#186
 | 
Canada thelegend27 
que sera sera
2019-09-30 07:11
#187
 | 
Canada thelegend27 
double post
2019-09-30 07:12
#191
 | 
Switzerland meme_jesus 
Just dont call it era at all lmao, cuz its not.
2019-09-30 07:28
0/8 question doesnt make since, he asks for the "shortest era." The definition of era is a long period of time that holds a distinct characteristic.
2019-09-30 07:30
#194
 | 
Algeria abdodz45 
make since? !
2019-09-30 11:19
bahahah you caught me slippin, GG
2019-09-30 14:31
#197
Hobbit | 
Iran Tajik! 
C9 didn't have era
2019-09-30 13:52
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.