Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Krieg is not OP!
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
When you think about it, if t's lose their kriegs and give it to ct's, they are responsible ror taking it back. It also helps t's to kill players at long distances with the scope and thats retty good because when you think about it, t's can kill the awper or the rifler hiding behind the car in banana with a flash or bh just peeking while holding their crosshair on there. And if hey loose their kriegs it favors the ct's and thag means t's dis a bad thing by buying it. And SG meta is better than the AUG meta bevause its a high risk an a high reward weapon. Unlike aug, which it helped ct's more and even tough they lose it, why would t's use a weaon like aug that cant even deal big amount of damage unlike ak or sg right? And I'm guessing that this is the main reason why Valve still didn't nerfed the krieg, cuz they know that it favors both sides unlike aug.
2019-11-03 22:37
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
also, why s1mple doesnt cry about sg and others do? because he is the greatest and he knows better, so does valve
2019-11-03 22:38
#3
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Very true.
2019-11-03 22:39
#17
 | 
France SpooceCooke 
He has though He did say he didn’t want to see it disappear either, just that it needed a fair nerf. In terms of price for example
2019-11-03 22:53
#35
 | 
Peru Bolbisaur23 
Very true, they gotta repeat what they did to the AUG. That would be fine. Or maybe reduce the armor penetration slightly so it's not a 1 shot kill.
2019-11-03 23:20
no, he said hes fine with krieg, he said "just make m4a4 kill with 1 bullet close range, just to balance it out". recently at blast pre show he said that when asked about sg
2019-11-03 23:27
#92
1000000 | 
China 0^x^0 
lmao s1mple's retarded
2019-11-04 03:32
#102
 | 
Brazil BlueLighting 
but makes sense... I mean even FiveSeven kills with 1 bullet in close range but a rifle like m4 doesn't... that's pretty awful
2019-11-04 05:02
#103
1000000 | 
China 0^x^0 
m4 should not be able to one tap five seven is a shitty pistol with slow fire rate and bad accuracy
2019-11-04 05:07
if it happens, it will be op af, just spray and pray to get some mad headshots
2019-11-04 08:26
#120
 | 
CIS kryto203 
"close distance"
2019-11-04 12:42
#133
s1mple | 
Germany meljan 
I totally agree M4 should be close range 1 hit headshot = kill....but than we would amazing 2-3k spraydowns in close chokepoints. Like connector mirage, or monster overpass.
2019-11-04 18:23
#115
 | 
Europe MaHoTei 
HE DIDNT SAY NERF KRIEG HE SAID INSTEAD MAKE M4 ONE SHOT FROM CLOSE RANGE
2019-11-04 12:07
said he wanted the m4 to get 1 shot headshot from short distance like the aug
2019-11-04 19:27
#2
God | 
Poland henlo 
guns dont kill people
2019-11-03 22:38
#4
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Than what kills people?
2019-11-03 22:39
your mom
2019-11-03 22:41
#6
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Wtf(((
2019-11-03 22:41
Guns don't kill people, video games do - delusional guy
2019-11-03 23:55
that's true
2019-11-04 03:37
#107
 | 
Russia Islademuerto 
no they dont
2019-11-04 08:29
#108
 | 
Russia Islademuerto 
no studies have shown correlation between videogames and violence
2019-11-04 08:30
#113
 | 
Finland qunt 
I think they have. But correlation doesn't mean causation and I think its more likely that people that are more prone to violence play more violent games, not the other way around.
2019-11-04 12:00
#160
 | 
Russia Islademuerto 
not even correlation, these 2 things are unconnected. The reason why most shooters play video games is coz almost everyone does so to some extent and those games are often violent. My dad plays brattlefield and Arma, yet he could never harm a fly. My classmate played a bunch of racing games and is now serving a life sentence for killing a cop. It really isnt connected.
2019-11-04 21:06
#164
 | 
Finland qunt 
First of all, examples of your dad and classmate don't prove anything. And secondly, I read that study on which that forbes article you linked below was based on. And yes they didn't find any significant link between video games and violence. I'd argue that's mainly because they isolated the effect of the games by controlling with other variables such as gender and trait-level aggression. Which means that clearly the researchers thought the same as I did in my last comment. That there might be correlation (and there btw was a statistically significant positive correlation between aggressive behavior and violent game engagement), so it's necessary to control other variables affecting the matter to see if games are what is causing the violence. It's kinda same with the female wage gap thing. Yes there is a wage gap but it's not caused by sexual organs but by other (personality) differences between men and women. E.g. men are more competitive, thus more eager to succeed. Same with games: if you are violent person, you are more likely to play violent games. That doesn't mean that you are guaranteed to play violent games. Neither does that mean that you can't play violent games if you are not violent person. I hope you understood, statistics can be a bit pain in the ass if you are not familiar with the concepts. Basically I'm just arguing against that "not even correlation" statement, otherwise you are right )
2019-11-04 23:49
#169
 | 
Russia Islademuerto 
clear, ok
2019-11-05 06:41
I'm joking
2019-11-05 21:49
#175
 | 
Russia Islademuerto 
FUUUUUUU
2019-11-07 12:37
#131
 | 
United States xxpowmanxx 
I've seen more studies that show the opposite correlation
2019-11-04 18:19
#155
 | 
Russia Islademuerto 
links, I ll provide mine
2019-11-04 20:34
#157
 | 
United States xxpowmanxx 
My Mistake, I read that as "no, studied have shown correlation between videogames and violence".
2019-11-04 20:43
#158
 | 
Russia Islademuerto 
ah i c, np friend
2019-11-04 21:03
Dude I don't think you guys realise but I was joking.
2019-11-05 21:49
+1
2019-11-04 19:09
yes i confirm
2019-11-03 22:43
#8
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Thanks! I knew Swedish people were smart!
2019-11-03 22:44
By that logic the R8 wouldn't have been op if it was only for the T side
2019-11-03 22:47
#10
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Look, everyone that says r8 wasn't op are stupid ok? But i gotta ask you question, did tou read the thred?
2019-11-03 22:48
yes
2019-11-03 23:38
#51
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Ok then why did you said something stupid like that?
2019-11-03 23:51
Because the krieg is still op even if you have balance between teams using it
2019-11-04 00:42
#93
 | 
India skyl4rk 
+1
2019-11-04 03:32
No, cuz r8 cost 800€
2019-11-03 22:51
Krieg is cheap too especially with the new economy system
2019-11-03 23:38
Ak-47 is cheap too especially with the new economy system
2019-11-04 12:25
Thanks for irrelevant info. ak-47 is not op
2019-11-04 16:46
15 rounds in a game, you can buy the krieg in 13/14(lose/win pistol) of them... it's still cheap...
2019-11-04 03:09
15 rounds in a game, you can buy the ak-47 in 13/14(lose/win pistol) of them... it's still cheap...
2019-11-04 12:26
but the ak doesn't have the same impact the sg does... and that's the problem with it, te problem with the krieg isn't really that it is op...but that there's no point on buying an ak if you have the krieg that cheap
2019-11-04 16:04
I more or less agree, the problem is that T's can afford krig to often. And that they can get better buy then cts after lost pistol round
2019-11-03 22:50
#14
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Yes but what do you really expect to ct's to buy after they loose the pistol round?
2019-11-03 22:51
even if the cts buy everything they can the T's still have 3 krigs
2019-11-03 22:52
#18
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
I would stil eco if i lost the pistol round on ct side because t's can go to a or b as a team while ct's have to split up to defend both a, b and mid.
2019-11-03 22:54
+1 tbh if they just increased the price to like $3000 it'll be a lot more balanced
2019-11-03 23:22
tl,dr
2019-11-03 22:51
#15
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Krieg is not Op, you just have to think about why its not.
2019-11-03 22:52
#19
 | 
United States MidNCS 
If this isn't bait, then you're silver.
2019-11-03 22:58
#21
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Do you think i would waste my time to write a long thread like this while i could just write "Krieg is not OP"?
2019-11-03 23:01
yes
2019-11-03 23:59
#59
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
At least i talk about something better than some people on hltv do. which they realy like to create threads like NA CS XD or even +18 SEXY GIRL PICS.
2019-11-04 00:01
#82
 | 
United States MidNCS 
It's not OP for people who can't use it. It's very OP for people who can.
2019-11-04 02:57
#85
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Well, i can easily use the krieg without having a problem and i still think that its not op.
2019-11-04 03:13
shut up silver
2019-11-04 23:57
#166
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
??? Reply needs to have actual content.
2019-11-05 01:16
If there was a rank below silver you'd fit right in
2019-11-03 23:01
#34
 | 
United States MidNCS 
Ironic coming from a Russian
2019-11-03 23:17
#52
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Na cs doesn't have that much difference from ru cs tough
2019-11-03 23:51
NA Global = EU MGE
2019-11-04 00:13
You’re wilin brother. I was SEM/ Gn 1 on NA east and started playing on Eu and went up to Gn master max. But Na does have the advantage of better communication
2019-11-04 00:56
#96
Xyp9x | 
Denmark Khronov 
Flair check out no wonder you gold nova
2019-11-04 03:35
Not saying I’m good, saying the Eu is easier to be higher rank
2019-11-04 08:16
#117
 | 
Finland Karppanator 
U haven't been in a high rank though
2019-11-04 12:09
Again, not the discussion, the fact that I went up several ranks is what I responded about.
2019-11-05 02:10
#20
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Bump Come on guys, i know there are people out there that can argue with me rather than those idiot threads.
2019-11-03 22:59
#23
 | 
Ukraine efsiz1 
When you think about it, if t's lose their kriegs and give it to ct's, they are responsible ror taking it back. It also helps t's to kill players at long distances with the scope and thats retty good because when you think about it, t's can kill the awper or the rifler hiding behind the car in banana with a flash or bh just peeking while holding their crosshair on there. And if hey loose their kriegs it favors the ct's and thag means t's dis a bad thing by buying it. And SG meta is better than the AUG meta bevause its a high risk an a high reward weapon. Unlike aug, which it helped ct's more and even tough they lose it, why would t's use a weaon like aug that cant even deal big amount of damage unlike ak or sg right? And I'm guessing that this is the main reason why Valve still didn't nerfed the krieg, cuz they know that it favors both sides unlike aug.
2019-11-03 23:03
#25
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
So what? Did you come out with a Better conclusion rather than copy pasting my thread?
2019-11-03 23:04
#32
 | 
Ukraine efsiz1 
i didnt read it at all
2019-11-03 23:15
#54
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
As i expected
2019-11-03 23:54
#94
 | 
India skyl4rk 
+1
2019-11-04 03:33
"the krieg isn't op because the counter terrorists can steal it and then they have the op gun" ????????
2019-11-03 23:04
#26
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Yea? Why not?
2019-11-03 23:05
that's irrational reasoning
2019-11-03 23:07
#29
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Ok let me say this than; Krieg is a Op weapon( i have to agree with yhis) but its given to t's rather than ct's. So what im saying is that if t's think anout buying the krieg, there will be a chance of loosing the round. And if ct's can get it, its going to favor them while holding long range angles with a accurate weapon like krieg. But if t's doesn't buy it, nothing like this will occur and both sides will not have to scare from getting killed by the weapon. Get it?
2019-11-03 23:14
Turkish brain NT. Focus on kebabs
2019-11-03 23:33
#43
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Sorry but dis you come out with a better argument rather than saying Turkish brain xaxaa?
2019-11-03 23:35
Khabus n kebabs i love em men. Why argue on virtual things?
2019-11-03 23:40
#53
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Idk, i just have fun when i argue
2019-11-03 23:52
#56
 | 
Brazil Biel675 
yeah, t's can lose their kriegs to ct's and ct's will have them, but t's can just buy them again and at some time the ct's will lose their kriegs
2019-11-03 23:56
#57
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
But the krieg will help ct's more than it does t's. so it will not be easy for t's to take it back.
2019-11-03 23:59
#60
 | 
Brazil Biel675 
aug's much worse than the krieg. the krieg should be like $3000
2019-11-04 00:01
#61
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
I aggre. The price Is too low for a wepon like krieg.
2019-11-04 00:02
#73
 | 
Brazil Biel675 
krieg should be more OP than the aug, but $2750 against $3300 is a lot, krieg should be $3000, because the t's goal is more difficult than the ct's
2019-11-04 00:50
#78
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
True
2019-11-04 01:09
Why would you try to discuss here when the 98% of users are mentally damaged.
2019-11-04 00:09
#77
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Idk, i just feel like i have to say or type something to these people to make my self feel good.
2019-11-04 01:09
#95
 | 
India skyl4rk 
+1
2019-11-04 03:34
#97
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
why you are +1ing all the stupid ass comments?
2019-11-04 03:35
#101
 | 
India skyl4rk 
+1
2019-11-04 04:46
some very true and fair points, but i hate this meta. as a ct you never used to be able to get prefired domed from like 100m away as it simply is just highliy unlikely with an ak but with a krieg its pretty easy.
2019-11-03 23:06
#30
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Yea but its t's job to push at them rather than sitting and waiting ct's push at them. And ct's van easily close the distance bu smoking and hiding behind he smoke wih their teammates. If they loose the control, they can easily fall back and hold a different angle from a different side.
2019-11-03 23:13
what rank or level are you? just curious from ur experience not being toxic :P
2019-11-03 23:14
#36
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
I am silver 2 and i cant fuking rnk up even tough i won 10 games without loosig a single game and still stuck at it. (Most of the time i have 30 kills in my games with average of 50% head shots. and most of the time i am the one who gives calls, info and get the entry frags(i also dont play with awp and trh to hive it to my teammates cuz they are suck ag aiming) But i have 900 hours and i can easily play with pro players that it level 6-7 Any tips for ranking up XD i am bored of these silvers that doesn't listen me and die in 15 seconds as the round starts.
2019-11-03 23:20
im sorry bro but im level 8 on faceit and am global. the krieg is really irritating in our level so i still stand by it being op.
2019-11-04 16:38
#127
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
No problem cuz this is my oppinion and you dont have to agree with me.
2019-11-04 18:05
Any tips ? Don't play mm unless you wanna have fun with friends
2019-11-04 17:09
#126
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Yea but sometimes i feel like mm is better than faveit cuz at least people that play mm are nicer towardsme than those people who play Faceit. When ever i start bottom fraging they call me losr or bad words that makes me give up as they say it more and more.
2019-11-04 18:04
I feel you , but you can't let yourself care about those idiots that insult you when you bottom frag. I am around silver elite/silver elite master and my friends are gn and I actually play better against higher ranks , but when I bottom frag nobody cares , if someone does insult me , I just mute him and continue playing the game. Don't stress yourself with this game , the goal is to have fun , but if you care about rank so much idk what to tell you , if you wanna play with better teammates play Faceit , but Faceit is a toxic waste full of people who are cunts for no reason.
2019-11-04 19:02
#136
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
I mean what i want to achieve in mm os to get to a rank where i can play with people that has knowledge about cs that knows the vallouts, gameplay, teamwork and more. You are right about muting the people but whenever someone syas something at me i cant stop talking and answering in he same way as they do. That is on of hhe reasons i play favthe it but there is also another problem on faceit as i said and it is the amount of toxicity. So when ever i want to just play comp in not a serious way i mostly play mm. Buy ifbi want to lay comp as a tryhard and go for it even tough i know thhe is going to be toxic prople in there , i do play faceit.
2019-11-04 19:08
#33
 | 
Norway CheNaLii 
I get your point, but rather than thinking how it forexample also can favor the cts, maybe think about how we want the game and meta to be. 1: If Ts lose their kriegs then they will be able to rebuy it right away. Then both sides will only be playing with kriegs which is so boring imo. Ak/M4 is much better. 2: The krieg basically kills the AK. Tell me 3 reasons to buy the AK over the krieg. You cant? There you go. For its price it is way too good. I could show you hundreds of clips where the krieg does what no other gun in the game ever could. 3: Think of a Krieg - AWP duel. I have seen many ridiculous moments where someone with a krieg just destroys awpers (or others) in long range duels. It can consistently do that much more than other weapons in the game. A 2750$ gun that more or less consistently destroys AWPs at 4750$ sounds ridiculous to me.
2019-11-03 23:16
#39
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
1) i agree with you but before krieg meta started, ct's wa still using the ak if they got it. 2)you are right, it is op but it favors the both sides as i said and heres my reason for buying ak Deals more damge against un armored players You can control the spray better while sh has a really fucked up spray patern you move faster while you are holding the ak However, i feel pike reason 2) is the actual reaskn tl buy it over krieg. 3)imo its good for t's cuz fighting with awp is really hard especially if you are on t side. And ak cn also one tap like krieg does but it dowant have a scope or better standing accuracy. And also, awp cost too much because it doesnt really matter for you to aim at head to kill the guy in one shot while you can kill the enemy from their chest or stomach.
2019-11-03 23:37
#44
 | 
Norway CheNaLii 
1) Yeah CTs picked up the AK but there is a big difference between holding angles with an AK vs a krieg. The AK feels very balanced, while the krieg has a higher BPM etc. It just doesnt feel good executing a site and running into a krieg. 2) Well how many times are you using AK vs unarmored opponents? You can control the spray just as easily with the krieg as the AK. You just need to practice the spray (which honestly isnt that hard). And yea you are right, there is a small movement speed difference but it really doesnt matter. 3) Fighting people holding angles with an AWP should be by using your utility wisely and executing well, not by prefiring with a scoped gun with a high first bullet accuracy and one tap the AWPer. Sure you can in theory onetap awpers with an AK too, but the accuracy between the SG and AK is nowhere the same + the krieg has a scope.
2019-11-03 23:36
#49
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
1) thats what i am saying, t's will not have to get scared of pushing the site while they know the ct's have krieg if they dont buy yhe krieg de the begging and keep the game up wih the ak. 2) sg spray patern is easy? Its defined not i think cuz when i play wih ak or sg i can easily feel t difference between them. Ak has a better spray pattern to fight while you can lose all the control whil spraying with sg. You are right about the armor thing cuz everyone buys armor unless they are new in the game or something. And speed difference doesn't effect the enemy or you that much so i can also agree wirh that. 3)well, i get tored of using all my flashes to just blind a single awper that can quiclly peek after a single flash and i dont like to use my smokes to fight against awpers cuz most of time i am going to need smokes to block of the ct, or a side where ct's can push. Only thing that can help a player like me to fihht against awwpers is molotof which it only stays for few seconds and goes away unless we t's get the control where awper can push. Which as i said they can push ahain with their teammate's flash. But aince sg meta came in, it helped me more ro destroy shitry awpers on mm or faceit. And i belive my teammates can also agree wih that.
2019-11-03 23:48
#64
 | 
Norway CheNaLii 
1) Im not sure what your point is here. I dont think anyone can deny that holding angles with a krieg is straight out OP. Imagine going out on a site not knowing where the CT is holding. You have to clear many spots, while the CT can just hold the angle and spray you down easily. 2) Maybe to you the spray is hard, but it is all about practice. Ofc the spray is hard to control when you havent practiced it. But atm my spray is much better with the SG as that is the weapon im using the most lately. 3) Then you like the game to be simpler I guess, and there is nothing wrong with that. But also keep in mind that this is a highly competetive game and tactics and using your utility right is and has always been key. Most people, especially pros and high ranked players want weapons to feel balanced so the smartest players come out on top, not the ones who has the most kriegs. In all of CSGO’s history the main way to counter an AWPer has been using your utility, but now we got unfair weapons, which makes the game require less tactical skill and more «that team has 5 kriegs vs 4 kriegs so therefore they win»
2019-11-04 00:10
#70
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
1) my point is that there will be no problem with the kreig if t's will not buy it. Because we. All know that krieg gives at least 3 times more adventage rther than m4 or ak does. If t's not buy the krieg they will now have to get scared of cleaning all the corners. 2) nah its not that hard, i am just saying that spraying with ak is easier than sg553. 3) i actualy like complex games more than simple games, cuz most of the time i get bored by just shooting and killing the enmy and while trying to defend or attack the Bombsite. I am trying to say that i hate when i use all my ndes for a simple awper to defend him from taking the control. And i am saying that sg doesnt relly bother the game because it mostly a high risk high reward weapon that can both help t's by using and can also effect them in negative way if they loose their kriegs. I feel like sg gives a better opportunity for t'a to fight against awp more tjn utilities give them. And also having a krieg doesnt effect the gameplay that much cuz they can still fight against them but ith their team work.
2019-11-04 00:40
How the fuck is the krieg not nerfed yet when the AUG is? The krieg is literally a better version of pre-nerf AUG. Compared to the M4A4, M4A1-S, and AK47 it's literally better in every single measurable way except a MARGINAL movement speed difference that makes barely any difference (go watch s1mple's stream). It can challenge AWPs long range no utility, and destroys every rifler not using a krieg. This is why meta with AUG was way better. Garbage shit cans with AK/Krieg could actually get shut down before they run out and instantly headshot someone. Now all those idiots can roam free over the entire map. Krieg is not what these maps were balanced around clearly yet Valve still doesn't nerf it. Then you idiots who say "but it was in the game the whole time!!11!".... You're right. It was. That literally has nothing to do with game balance at all. If someone discovered that if you press num lock when using a MAG7 it would become an triggerbot rapid fire awp it would still be broken even if it was in the game since 2012... Only low IQ kids use this argument. When do you think the CSGO team have their mandatory lobotomies?
2019-11-03 23:24
#42
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
As i said in the last sentence of my thread, Valve still didn't nerfed the krieg because they know that if fabors both ct's and t's unlike aug which it doesnt deal that much damge as ak or sg does. Krieg alao bqlnces the t side by gicing them a good accuracy and scope to fight against enemies at the long range. especially to fight against Awp! Dis i said anything about it was in the game? I gave you many reason why it is betrwr than aug and favors both sides but i think you didn't red it well. People statted to use it after they noticed how good is to fight agaisnt people on the long rang. Cuz they knoe that sg gives them more fire power rather than am does. Also I don't get the lat sentence you wrote.
2019-11-03 23:34
#47
 | 
Norway CheNaLii 
Well the old R8 favored both teams aswell. Doesnt mean that it shouldnt have gotten nerfed.
2019-11-03 23:39
#50
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
But r8 was different. It cost for a lower price, it had the same amount of damge as awp did which is trully fukin OP. And everyone can agree that it was the least skilled version of awp.
2019-11-03 23:49
underrated thread
2019-11-04 00:08
#63
 | 
Spain akproxx 
low iq thread
2019-11-04 00:09
#68
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Why? Do you have any prof that shows i have lol iq?
2019-11-04 00:22
I agree with this
2019-11-04 00:10
krieg best advantage is scope as it can kill players on long range easily. aug is hard to control on range so cts have to use m4 instead. so the only long range weapon for cts is awp. result: cts must give up long ranges, unless someone has awp. which completely changes game and gives terrors more opportunities. but awpers aswell are afraid of that gun. krieg is op and thats a fact. NT FURIA fangay. /closed
2019-11-04 00:23
#72
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
??? I dont like br teams what are you talking about? And T's are betet with krieg as you said cuz they can fight against awpers without using their utility and it balances the game more for t's so i like it. Aug is worse than m4? Lol no, it acrually has a better spray patern than m4 does and it also has a scope that favors ct's. and most important is that it can kill t's in one shot at close range which t's have to get close to ct's to kill them. Cts must give up in long ranges? Dude, ct's has to take over the long ranges to take over better amount of place in the game.
2019-11-04 00:47
Only EG is enough to prove that T side now is much stronger than ct. Teams almost have no chance winning against them. Fast executes lets them take bombsite and take angles after plant. And in most of scenarios cts have no more utilities. Retake almost impossible even if numbers favor cts. U cant argue with facts. T side has shown much mote strength in last 1-2 months than ct.
2019-11-04 01:08
#79
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
You are right but these people are also loosing becuse how they are playing bad in these days. Look how asttalis and liquid layed on the last blast series. I feel like eg is gaining more power because how these top 1 teams are playing bad in the latest days. Also fast exucutes has been one of the roblems for ct side and i ont think this really has to do something with krieg but yea sure it can still affect the gameplay. And ofc its ging to be hard for ct's to rotate after they lose the side while t's have kriegs in their hands.
2019-11-04 01:14
#75
 | 
United States JustBitsy 
I killed a player using the sg just last game.
2019-11-04 01:04
#80
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Noice, was he mad?
2019-11-04 01:14
#81
 | 
United States JustBitsy 
He complained the whole match
2019-11-04 01:21
#84
 | 
Finland Smoonah 
Oh, you meant the SG.
2019-11-04 03:13
#86
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
You were on my latest krieg thread too, why you are atill asking the same question?
2019-11-04 03:15
#87
 | 
Finland Smoonah 
Because you have yet to learn from mistakes, and you don't shut the fuck up about the SG. All you do is complain about it in multiple threads. You really think Valve will see your multiple thread on HLTV (incorrectly naming one of the T sided guns) and be like "Oh, he's right. We should do everything this random says along with renaming it a kreig." Yeah.
2019-11-04 03:17
#89
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
do you think that i am writing this threads to show valve i am right and they should not nerf or let the sg553 stay like this forever? The only reason why i am writing these threads is that people are really saying that sg is op and its bad and i dont think it is. So i am sharing my oppinion here to tell people that they should also look at krieg from a different side with a different oppnion rather than just saying "tHiS wEaPoN iS oP PlS NeRf VaLvE" by watching some clips on youtube or twitch. there is also other people in here that aggrees with me and i am not that stupid eneough to create a thread on hltv to make valve see it right? Its funny how you are thinking that even calling sg5553 krieg triggers you so hard that you wrote the same sentence again on my other thread about sg.
2019-11-04 03:27
#90
 | 
Finland Smoonah 
Your opinion means very little in terms of "change."
2019-11-04 03:28
#91
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Why you are still speaking bullshit? did you come up here to talk with me properly about krieg? because it is the main reason why i created this thread.
2019-11-04 03:29
#99
 | 
Finland Smoonah 
Not sure what defines "up here" but yes I did come to this particular thread to talk to you specifically about the SG. I don't know what the "Kreig" is in CSGO.
2019-11-04 03:39
#100
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
I meant to say: Did you come out with a better explanation rather than speaking bla bla. I dont even fuking know why do people call sg krieg. But because most of the people call it by saying krieg rather than sg, i like to call it as krieg like how they do.
2019-11-04 03:42
#88
 | 
United States ShawnM 
krieg isn't OP it's extremely retarded and should be nerfed to oblivion
2019-11-04 03:25
tldr;
2019-11-04 08:24
Let's add a rifle with a scope that is a 1-shot kill to the body for the T-Side. It isn't OP because if CTs pick it up, it's way harder for the Ts!!! Dumbest logic, don't know why I keep seeing these retard debates.
2019-11-04 08:30
#110
 | 
Finland 0lter 
lmao what even are you saying mr autist
2019-11-04 08:37
OP's argument exaggerated to show how dumb logic it is.
2019-11-04 11:44
#112
CeRq | 
Bulgaria Ramky 
I stopped reading on ''krieg is not op''.
2019-11-04 11:47
#129
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
How can tou rate my thread and have an oppinion before you even actually read the all thread?
2019-11-04 18:15
#130
CeRq | 
Bulgaria Ramky 
nah i won't even explain. One name: Furia
2019-11-04 18:17
#132
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
What? Many teams in these days are using krieg because how they knownits powerful. This doesn't have anything to do with furi or some teams vuz literally all the teams rigtt now are using it to win.
2019-11-04 18:21
#135
CeRq | 
Bulgaria Ramky 
aaaaaaaaaaaaand you just said yourself, that krieg is overpowered. Ty.
2019-11-04 19:06
#139
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
I said powerful and not op bitch. If yoj remember thre is difference between op and being powerful. So in your logic, i would say awp as a op Weapon.
2019-11-04 19:10
#140
CeRq | 
Bulgaria Ramky 
-''literally all the teams rigtt now are using it to win.'' -not op pick one +reported for insult
2019-11-04 19:13
#141
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
So in that logic ak is also p bvauee jow itcan one tap the enemy lauers at long range with god accuracy I am going to pick not op as a answer. Also i dont care! Go report me how much you want admins will not ban me
2019-11-04 19:16
#142
CeRq | 
Bulgaria Ramky 
Well they should give you an IQ test instead. Now look closely what you write me the former and the more former message. You are literally against you statement in #139
2019-11-04 19:17
#143
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
I get it, you are just trying ro trigger me. Sorrh but you don't look like a good person to argue with.
2019-11-04 19:19
#144
CeRq | 
Bulgaria Ramky 
I can't argue with you - you do that already with yourself :D Sorry not sorry
2019-11-04 19:19
#145
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Tou do that with your aelf? Didnt you see all the conversations i had with other people in this thread about krieg being op or not?
2019-11-04 19:24
#149
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
As i tought you are just trying to act like a jerk that is smart rather than having a actual conversation like i did with other people in this thread.
2019-11-04 19:29
#150
CeRq | 
Bulgaria Ramky 
I can't have a conversation with you. You already said two different things. Have a good night! /closed
2019-11-04 19:31
#151
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
Nevermind, good fuing night
2019-11-04 19:31
its just ok
2019-11-04 12:04
#116
 | 
Slovakia sanjuro 
i like your analysis
2019-11-04 12:07
#121
 | 
Russia F1Z1K 
+1
2019-11-04 12:47
#128
 | 
India UhddiS 
NT Evil Genius
2019-11-04 18:06
#137
CeRq | 
Bulgaria Ramky 
We are not Furia myfriendo ))
2019-11-04 19:08
#152
 | 
India UhddiS 
+1 :)
2019-11-04 19:37
#153
Finland em8 
How exactly is the SG a high risk high reward weapon?
2019-11-04 19:39
#159
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
sg can help t's to win and fight at long ranges with its standing and crouching accurcy. And sg is also good at many point points than the AK. But sg helps more to ct's than it help to t's. So if t's are playing against good players and if they buy sg to fight against them and if they loose it they will have a hard time to get it back from them, Unlike AK which is easier to fight against rather than sg. Tl;dr High reward: sg is easier and better than ak and helps t's at many things to fight against such as in long ranges and awp. High risk: if t's loose their sg's they will have a hard time to get it back and its going to be a problem for them.
2019-11-04 21:05
#154
 | 
Denmark ghostan11 
Yes you know better than 80% of pros who have said that sg is 2op /Close
2019-11-04 20:02
#161
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
i am sure i don't have that much knowladge about csgo but at least i am in a level where i can judge and critize.
2019-11-04 21:06
nt brehze
2019-11-04 21:07
#163
DaZeD | 
Turkey qubeKs 
pls reply to my comment if you want to argue with me about kreg being op or not.
2019-11-04 21:08
People will call anything that isn't AK or M4 OP so valve nerf and everyone have to go back to playing AK and M4
2019-11-05 02:18
#170
 | 
India spiderCAKE 
Agree that it's a high-risk high reward and maybe that's why Valve has kept its price low so that Ts can compete if they lose their kriegs to CTs. Krieg is OP only in terms of price imo. 2850-2950 is a better price range. Players totally shouldn't be able to buy it in 2nd round. But if Krieg is nerfed in price, I think AUG needs to be buffed. I hope Valve doesn't fuck up the gun like they did the AUG with reduced rate of fire if they decide to nerf it. And pls no m4 1 bullet hs kill in close range. Teams simply need to adapt to the meta and know what the risks are. For example, Fnatic used only AKs on their T-side vs FURIA on mirage at Starlagger event because they knew FURIA are OP with the Kriegs.
2019-11-05 09:11
For $50 more, for a decoy, you have a much more powerful rifle than the AK, the Krieg requires no skill, even in no scope there is almost no recoil on this weapon, all through the head. Personally this weapon doesn't bother me, I'm an Awper (the most powerful weapon in the game), one shot one kill, so I don't care about the krieg, but for a rifler who plays AK or M4 it must be a problem for him I guess, it casualizes the game but well, he must adapt.
2019-11-05 10:05
Scoped AK doesn't fit cs. This isn't PUBG.
2019-11-05 10:51
01:15Falkol vs DELIRAWOWZIK
Falkol
2.11
DELIRAWOWZIK
1.68
01:009z vs Agressive
9z
1.38
Agressive
2.95
04:00TYLOO vs Syman
TYLOO
1.32
Syman
3.26
Bet
Return
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.