Thread has been deleted
Last comment
strawpoll.me/19026830/
which of these best describes your political Ideology .
Center or center-left/right is the only option for non-retarded people
Far-left/right you mean?
the ultimate solution 👌😎
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/t..
Expected
Do you prefer Hitler or Staline?
Commies - 👎😩
Nutzieres - 💪😎
That's a weird way of spelling Anarcho Primitivism
+1
*leftist if u ask me
Only option for people who don't want anything to change because they're good in their comfort and they don't care if someone is starving in front of their house. This and right/far-right can suck my peepee
lol, change isn't always better
Found the far-left idiot.
cry is free idiot
not believing in a one dimensional political spectrum is the only option for non retarded people
very big shame
far-right is on the rise even on HLTV
He is right tho
edit: forget about it misread the comment
Expected from Hirohito
i am texan but nt
wtf men not true???
prove it or....
men(((
idk what u r talking about
in poland is a right populistic party in the government
socialdemocrates = left yes but not equal to liberals
social democrates tend (should) to socialism or at social capitalism they wan to raise taxes on industryy and on inheritance... liberals dont want any taxes on as much as possible
lul didnt pis officialy say that they are against lgbt, against taking refugees, against abortion, and that they are nationalist and religious (catholic) party? if yes, it seems rightist for me
how is it working out everyone knows, it doesnt matter who is leftist or rightist in the end, everyone in government just want money for himself
Less-educated people almost always vote right, nt
Are you kidding me? Every communist I know, spent tonnes of time reading Marxism book, while most of the central-right wing just praise how wonderful capitalism is without reading any book, 95% of them arguing about communism with me are just plain retarded.
'The weapon of criticism cannot, of course, replace criticism of the weapon, material force must be overthrown by material force; but theory also becomes a material force as soon as it has gripped the masses.'
Karl was very keen in spreading his theory, hes a man that believe revolution should be bottom up not the other way around. For masses to start a revolution its important that everyone knows the politics behind it. BTW Karl Marx is the one that had impletented the binary dictatorship, that a society can either be capitalist dictatorship or poletariat dictatorship, there is nothing in between.
or just national-socialistic
we see the right as a mix of free market+conservative ideas, while the left as a mix of socialism+progressive ideas. Pis is not conservative (pis only says that they are, but their actions suggest otherwise) and is socialistic, therefore their ideas match them with leftism.
our country gives u the chance to have a voice in who leads it. u shouldn't just not care about that.
no, youre doing exactly what youre supposed to do. produce, consume, pay taxes, produce, consume, pay taxes, dont worry about what is going on in the world, everything is fine as long as the rich can make money from your labour.
imgur.com/a/yjWwFnE
far-right
literally fascism
Far-right UNITED! 💪🏿😎💪🏿
+1
Far-right can't unite, they will kill each other like WW1.
far-up
national socialism.
that's far left
Erdogan is right leaning
Saudia Arabia is far right, etc..
nt
in what way does being an islamist mean being a leftist? genuinely confused
It does works, I don't see why it shouldn't. And you seems to not know why the right and left are named this way if you think royal system can't fit.
Which correspond to far right in every multi political parties country.
So Saudi = far right.
Same goes with erdogan, corresponding to right/far right economical, social, nationalistic and cultural policies.
classic western left right hasnt applied anywhere in the world since the 1970s
The fact that you focus on the villa part in his comment just shows how brainwashed YOU are
How do you know what i believe? I even know what villa you are talking about but its funny to see how you just ignore the first sentence in his comment xd
islamists are far right
NT poland it's far-right like your shitty country
Didnt watch dont care nt poland
cry is free xaxaxa
Ok poland still dont care
Impossible in center-left politics 😎
Impossible in poor countries like Bulgaria and Serbia where a lot of welfare is given to the voters of the ruling party
Will you kill all national traitors?
now you just proved you aint 1 iq dawg
+1 if you mean terceira via
what about up and down
Remember that Nazism is far left so it's a perfect opportunity to troll
Far right retards would never be able to create such beautiful thing
cya in 10
Cya man good luck in leaving hltv
Centrist leaning right
haha right-winged rules!
my political view:
europe needs immigrants and refugees and should not refuse to take them
they need them for diversity, grow population and hard loyal workers
awful view
best view turkey top 1 poland pierogi 2
0/10
"diversity" ok... Keep cultures in their own nations please.
I know, doesn't mean I have to agree with their immigrant policy, retard.
I mean, I like my nation, I am proud to be born here. But I can disagree with immigration if I want to, even if my nation has taken in a lot of them. Look at Melbourne, so much asians.
Really? Tell me why having an opinion on a policy is retarded?
Yeah, true. But because I have a negative opinion on immigration doesn't mean I am retarded, it is just my opinion silly.
I mean, being against immigration isn't retarded at all. Australia is a colony and we did rise due to the immigration of gold workers but it isn't retarded to be against immigration. Especially if your country is suffering from it now.
done now?
if you believe immigration is bad, move back to the UK, and give land back to the aboriginals, or shut up about it.
Schnauzeappelflap
sorry, what?
You heard
i know what schnauze means in german but i have no clue what youre trying to say.
Not my department
try to form a full sentence instead of just throwing random words at me. it will also help you to come across as moderately intelligent.
I like how I offended two people with my opinion against immigration. Lmao.
Imagine being a centrist lmaoooo
No
Yeah Yeah Yeah Wow Wow Wow
far left
Far-right
fascism/nazism/monarchism
Monarchism isn't always far right depends on the ruler and if it is a absolute monarchy
it isnt left or right at all
It can be depends on the monarch. If he or she is a nationalist then it's right
+1
Where did this stupid shit that far-right always mean evil come from?
Small brain people like to demonize rational people.
I still try to understand what's going on in a leftist's head
yes, wanting free healthcare, free education and just wanting people to be able to live off of one job without going in debt and becoming poor is such an awful thing. who would ever want that
+1 big brain Viking
looking for somewhere that worked
germany, denmark, norway.... looking for any valid arguments. if you say venezuela i'm good, not gonna bother to explain to you how that isnt democratic socialism
Hey bro are you a democratic socialist too?
would rather use the term social democrat, but yeah basically
I mean it's just saying it the other way around
takes away a tad bit of "socialism" to it. i would say its a little less left. but yeah not any difference to really argue about
mandem gotta rep the set innit
netherlands germany scandinavia
what exactly "isnt free" ?
do you know what tax redistribution means?
reinvesting taxes into free healthcare is a possibilty, so if you are already paying taxes why not do it for something you actually benefit from?
You are not paying the same. It depends on your income the higher it is the more taxes you pay, but for the lower and middle class they actually gain money then if that were to get insurance
No it's too allow equal opportunity between the classes. If someone from the lower class say breaks an arm, and they can't pay for any insurance, bam there goes (on average) 2,500 which they can't afford. The higher class can afford getting taxed a little bit more.
Are you saying that any taxes is there? That's how the government gets alot of their money
I mean it's wealth redistribution. it's not stealing just redistributing it. And it's not against international law so it isn't steali g
If you didn't give your taxes your country would collapse and the military would fall into disrepair so it is in your own Interest to pay taxes
Ah yes corruption
its not free, but its like having health insurance without having greedy insurance companies that want to make millions from sick people by denying coverage. so its much cheaper than private healthcare. also, govt can easily make it mandatory if they provide the healthcare, and then everyone has health insurance and people are healthier and happier and more productive than if they had to worry about getting sick or cant afford treatment.
its cheaper in total for the country as a whole because there is no profit being extracted by the insurance company.
no its not because of it, its because everyone EVERY SINGLE ONE is paying for it. if you have a company and 100% of the population is paying for you service ( EVEN THE ONES WHO DONT WANT THE SERVICE since you are obrigated to pay) of course your service will be cheaper than the concorrence zzzz
its funny to see how delusional you are "just because i dont have to pay when im not sick its cheaper"
you destroyed this dumbass
Ancap
right, could also went for center-right
This scale depend of your national scene in fact. For instance, in France Biden would be right leaning.
Center left
Classical liberalism
so center-right
right
not quite, some'd say its more like lib right, as hayek is putted on political compass
you cant put liberalism in left/right scale. its a seperate dimension of the political spectrum. liberalism vs authoritarianism.
+1 finally a good point :D
tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23256249..
it is argued that fascism was profoundly indebted to capitalism even as it was, in other ways, passionately opposed to it.
given that fascism is a form of highly authoritarian capitalist society, it can be placed on the far right if you absolutely insist on squashing the N-dimensional political spectrum down into a 1-dimensional line from right to left. which is what most ppl tend to do because thats what they learn by watching the government propaganda on the evening news.
can u add 'suckin dick and smokin nic' to the list?
I almost put far right because in europe thats what id be as a libertarian lmao.
+1 lol
no, here you would just be an anarchist. which are actually placed on the far left. american libertarianism is just anarchism with even more illusions about how nice people would be to each other with no government around to stop them from beating each other to death.
How does live and let live equate to anarchy to you lmao.
just get the feeling leftists will get the "intuition" that despite this democratic vote, the vote is retarded cause they are always right no matter what , so therefore it is clearly wrong and people are just stupid. am I right?
yeah just pretend to be dumb u bitch
us and them
over and over again
Gotta love technically being conservative freedom party which is the weirdest political alignment to have
ULTRA-LEFTIST
where
Name checks out ya smolani masriah
Jkjk
far left
ok esquerdinha
ok boomer
Tribalism is for fools
Things affecting my daily life influences my voting.
That said, I want legal/medicinal cannabis in my country (Belgium), so I almost feel like I have to vote center left. Especially when there's one far right party that declares war on drugs (including cannabis) in Belgium. I mostly agree with that sentiment, I just think the line should be drawn when cannabis is legal.
Tough shit for me because the northern part of Belgium (Flemish region) becoming very right wing.
Why does this affect my daily life? Because I fully consider myself a medicinal user, I have a condtion that would allow me to get a prescription in multiple parts of the world with better laws.
fun fact: in like 2014 the ministry of justice in netherlands determined it would be a good idea to legalize cannabis to reduce amount of money that drug trafickers and other organized crime makes on it and free up government resources for fighting other crime. the high ranked bureaucrats in this ministry including several ministers themselves just ignored that advice for 5 years. then this whole thing came out. and it was ordered there should be a test. the parliament then made this test so small scale that every major city in the country refused to sign up for it because its a waste of time and money. rip legalization for another 10 years at least.
46% of hltv is retarded, sad
#145
So almost every white country? What a surprise
ok racist
What is your problem with white people? I see you crying on every thread.
left
FAR RIGHT GANG🦍 🤛😎🤜🦍
Democratic socialist
Yeah I have been to the dsa convention several times
Wdym I am
hes brazilian lol, in bolsonaro brazil socialism is the devil
Ah yes forget
kk Sorry bro, i forget that socialism was very democratic in china, russia, cuba, north korea... I'm just dumb, forgive me please! Forgive me because, socialism is not a dictatorship of the self-appointed proletariat, i'm just dumb. Forgive me because the socialist economic system is not a fraud, which regulates and controls all means of production causing mass misery in the most authoritative way possible. I'm just dumb again.
Ok child rapist
if youre independent you dont need to belong to any group
Libertarian left
Anarcho communism?
no... that's an oxymoron as anarchism is no governmental control and communism is full governmental control. I think people should have the freedom to defend themselves and their property, freedom of speech ,freedom of the press and pretty much everything along those lines and government should be kept within reason, no ridiculously high taxes, no tax on income. There should be as little regulation as possible but enough to keep people safe and enough to protect the air people breathe, the water they drink and the land they live on. People shouldn't be persecuted for their race, religion, sex but neither should private businesses have to bend their beliefs to accommodate such, e.g gay wedding cakes from christian businesses and so on. Drugs should be legalised taxed and regulated within reason as to make them as safe as possible and to eliminate the possibility of drug funded gangs. There should be tax payed funded education with a private option. Collage or higher education should not be free as you are going into higher education to get a job theoretically that will be able to pay off your student debt if not then you've made bad choices. The country as a whole should try to increase job grows in the private sector and insentivise companies to base themselves there rather than punish them for basing themselves in other countries with tax breaks etc. I think that about covers everything or at least covers enough to get the basics of what libertarian left is and I mean left in more of a socially left way rather than economically left.
You have zero clues what communism is then. Bye.
Everyone knows what communism is It's killed enough people for it to be pretty accurately documented. But your flag checks out and I know you're probably only saying that to bump up your credit score.
soviet communism isnt the only communism lol
Read a dictionary. Not every libertarian wants a plutocratic oligarchy that many libertarian countries turn into, and not every communist wants an authoritarian state.
communism by definition is state control of the economy and nationalisation of industry you're just retarded and haven't read shit like the communist manifesto if you believe otherwise you absolute fucking moron.
you cant be economically right and socially left. if you support right wing economic policies, you are supporting oppression of the working class. there is no such thing as ethical capitalism.
Well I've just clearly outlined how you can be so you're wrong there buddy.
Far Right 😎
what? how?
collectivism is leftism and nazis were collectivists
your names already enough for me bruv
what's wrong with his nickname? fuck off commie
also explain to me how collectivism is solely "leftism" lmao
congratulations, you win the award for most braindead comment in this entire thread. i read the whole thing. please collect your medal with a 1000kg block of concrete around your ankles at the bottom of the mariana trench.
+1
Well, the Nazis had anti-capital and free market economic policies. The very name of the party indicates that they had a semi-socialist bias. A state-planned economy where even product prices were fixed. That is, a state economy, not a market economy, where factories worked for the benefit of the government. That's what most leftists ask for today ... More regulations and control!
the name of that party was chosen deliberately to take voters from the Socialist Party. nazi party had nothing to do with socialism lol. they invented a lot of policies currently used by the european central bank. they were authoritarian capitalists, with a limited free market where the govt decided who competed in which market. it wasnt all completely state planned. it was actually one of the least regulated economies in europe at the time.
voxeu.org/article/macroeconomics-germany..
I'm not any mad at you. I don't even understand why you feel that someone who's giving you advice to seek for education because you've made yourself a fool internationally, is mad at you. I'm not. I feel sad, in fact. I believe you can't understand the word education maybe, I mean instruction.
Because you act extremely arrogant, just call me dumb, said I'm a joke, but you couldn't write a single argument against mine ... I thought I could have a normal conversation, but you can't. I disagree with your political view, and you accuse me of being a bolsominion? Really? The economy of the third reich was planned, which means they were not right wing, while the right wing means a free economy aka the opossite. That is all, that is my argument. But you just can't answer, you prefer to offend me for days...
Right wing doesn't mean free economy. You're still making yourself a fool repeating dumbness here. Stop. Seek for fkin education and free yourself of this dumbness. The problem is as I first posted here: You guys can't even understand BASIC concepts and don't want to learn. Thinking right wing means free economy and left wing means state intervention is nothing else but dumbness, stupidity. Seek for education. Stop the pride of dumbness. Stop! Please!
"There are only two possibilities in Germany; do not imagine that the people will forever go with the middle party, the party of compromises; one day it will turn to those who have most consistently foretold the coming ruin and have sought to dissociate themselves from it. And that party is either the Left: and then God help us! for it will lead us to complete destruction – to Bolshevism, or else it is a party of the Right which at the last, when the people is in utter despair, when it has lost all its spirit and has no longer any faith in anything, is determined for its part ruthlessly to seize the reins of power – that is the beginning of resistance of which I spoke a few minutes ago." - Hitler Himself
Aight
this argument comes from marxian socliasts, and they will till the end of time claim that the natsocs were not socialists. natsocs claimed that international socialism cannot be socialism because its aiming to remove volkisch society. a connection between socialism and community was made in natsoc. however, the economy of third reich was state planned, prices were fixed and production was numbered. factories, and other big/medium bussiness was subjugated by the party, which is so damn similar, if not, identical to what the soviets did, and marxists hail as true socialists, on the path to communism. also the huge improvement of the working class, with social programs and so on...the german working class was the bastion of natsoc until the very end of the war.
Individualism
Center right
Left? #VoteNDP Idk just give me free tuition and I'm as happy as a bee
#VoteForBernie
#FeelTheBern
Why not: progressive, conservative, libertarian
Center left is da best mens)))
Far-Left,
Anticapitalism, Marxism-Lenninsm, Trotskyism.
>Marxism-Lenninsm
>Trotskyism
Pick one
you are correct, only ml/m works
Work, Left Foot, State owns people rights, Economy is shared with everyone.
one dimensional right to left political alignment in 2019 lul
dungeons and dragons has a more complicated alignment system than your world view.
Pretty much this. "Left-wing" and "right-wing" are little more than buzzwords at this point.
So, hive mind with human slaves?
I'm left, most of you would probably call it far left I assume, but it is not, since to me far left is communism and I'm not communist.
For instance I am in favor in an heavy regulation of capitalism :
- with corporate profit to be fairly shared between owners and workers ( dividends can't be more than workers bonuses). And most of my income comes from dividends, so I'm in favor of rules against my income.
- wage gap limitation inside a company (exemple : the top income can't be more than 50 time the lowest).
- massive investment from the state in science, education, healthcare, and renewable technology
etc
Who stops you from doing the first one and the second one? Just create a company and share your profits with your workers. But do not force your ideas onto everyone else.
Do you think it is okay if someone invests 1 billion into his company and then shares his profits with people who came 2 months ago to work?
you cant do that, because then you will lose in competition against some asshole who treats his workers like shit and then everyone who worked for you doesnt have a job at all.
it has to be the same rules for all businesses.
That doesn't make any sense, if workers earn more for the same work and get treated better at your company, why would they work for the competition in the first place?
because one business cant just instantly hire every person in the country? you need to grow. to be able to grow you need to compete. to be able to compete you need to fuck people. to grow you need to have lower costs so that you can sell for a lower price than the competition.
then you need to have enough money saved or borrowed from banks to be able to sell at this low price and run at a loss for years. until your competition goes bankrupt. thats how you get market share.
when you have market share you can start to increase your profit margin by increasing prices and again lowering costs. no where in this whole plan is there any incentive to pay workers more. only less.
That depends on what imaginary company we are currently arguing about. Then again, if you need to pay your workers equally to yourself your product prices will probably be skyhigh.
not if the owners of the company get a normal living wage instead of 20.000 or a million normal living wages.
I will never be able to buy a Porsche then.
my dad owned a porsche. theyre overrated. break down all the time. use loads of gas. you can only go drive them with the roof down on the 5 days in summer where its not raining. you need to pay for a garage to store it in as well. and they rust.
you can have a lot more fun for the amount of money a porsche costs.
take it from me, seeing happiness on the faces of the children of your employees is worth more than any amount of porsches in the world. money cant buy everything.
But everything above you stated is valid to some kind of perfect economy where companies don't bankrupt. In fact in reality everything is kinda different and if the company bankrupts what is gonna happen with the workers? How are they gonna feed their family in a country where everything will be hella expensive?
in a country where workers get a fair share of the profits, you would have enough money saved to buy a house without lending money from a bank, and buy food for 10 years, after working maybe 1 or 2 years 40 hours a week. you wouldnt have to pay rent for your house to the assholes who currently own all the companies and houses.
if a company bankrupts in a society where people get a fair wage, that is fine, they can get a fair wage somewhere else. or not, and then they can get a nice handout from the government that is paid for by all the extra taxes that the other workers pay over their higher wage, instead of all the profit going to panama through a tax loophole. as long as the money stays in europe and is spent here, giving people free money doesnt cost the government anything. it all comes back in taxes eventually.
distributing money better doesnt mean everything will become more expensive.
simple hypothetical example: 1 liter of milk costs 1 euro now. 50% of this is wages for workers, 50% is cost of the milk and storage tanks and transport trucks and factories etc.
you double everyones wage. the cost of the wage for the people who make milk doubles. the cost for storage tanks etc will also slightly increase because they also require labour to make. but raw material, the steel used in the tanks, and the milk itself, will not magically become more expensive.
so, lets say milk now costs 1,60 per liter. but everyone gets double the money. so we can all buy more milk.
and it doesnt depend on what company we argue about. in a competitive market, you cant be nicer to your employees than the competition. it costs you money that they dont have to spend. so you lose if you do that. end of story.
this is why we have a mandatory minimum wage and 40 hour work week.
You don't take in account that the workers of your company can benefit from the cheaper stocks you create as well.
thats not relevant. benefit for the workers doesnt equal benefit for the company in our economic system. its actually a disadvantage. you make more by treating people like garbage.
I understood that but I still can't understand how is it better if you receive 100 000$ salary and a loaf of bread costs 1000$ than if you receive 100$ and a loaf of bread costs 1$?
see #339
also maybe read up on price elasticity/inelasticity
It does matter, if your company already has a monopoly on the market you can afford to pay your employees more, then there is no incentive to work at competing companies.
If you just started a business then it is indeed hard to follow these policies and also manage to beat competition.
if you have a monopoly, then you can afford to pay your workers almost nothing because they have nowhere else to go.
you are reasoning about it like this: how much can i afford to pay my workers?
actual companies reason opposite: how little can i afford to pay my workers?
you seem really naive about how this works. its only about money. not about being nice to people.
So what do you think happens if you pay your workers next to nothing?
If I get paid more cleaning shit off the street than working for a world leading diamond company, guess how long i'd be working for that diamond company, not long.
Also I should've said near-monopoly instead of monopoly.
for example garbage pickup is a job that pays pretty well, not a lot of ppl want to do it.
you can make 3300 euro per month as a bus driver in province of Utrecht. again a job not a lot of ppl want because you have to get up early.
you are reasoning from the position where you have more choice of employers than the employers have choice in employees. this only happens for a few years every time the economy is booming. its usually the other way around. like 80% of the time.
and then you just have to take the job you can get even if it is shit otherwise you cant afford to pay the rent. and the employer can just take one of the next 10 ppl in line who are also looking for a job.
if all the street cleaning jobs are taken, and all the other jobs are taken except for the one that pays shit at the diamond company, and you need to put food on the table for your family, then you'll take it.
That's a big if but sure, that's why we still have minimum wage requirements.
well then you know why it doesnt pay to treat your employees well in this system unless the government forces companies to do it with rules like minimum wage.
and its why i think on top of minimum wage we need a minimum profit share as well
I don't think it's fair to leech off of someone else's success.
Who's leeching off someone else's success?
Because in the current system, the share holders does.
For exemple, I invested in Tencent, never worked for them, never worked for their owned companies.
Fortnite went out with the success you know.
Tencent (owning 40% of Epic) saw its direct profit increase (dividends) and its property value (shares value) increase. So did I.
So without doing anything at all I won juicy dividends and another bonus when I sold my share afterwards.
Isn't that leeching?
Meanwhile if you consider workers to leech off their company success, why that company employ them then?
That's called investing
No, really?
also, monopolies are usually not allowed to exist by government, they want an oligopoly that has some limited competition where the companies have deep enough pockets to pay the politicians to pass favourable legislation.
in fact, since the last 30 years, share given to owners, aka dividends, skyrocketed. While wages didn't.
I'm not talking about creating a whole new system, but a system that was in place already not so long ago.
Prices wouldn't skyrock, as to increase your own profit you would have to make it so high that concurrence would beat you up.
What if concurrence agree to up the price as well you might ask? We already have laws against that.
I also forgot that I would make a law for 50% of the board sits to be fill with worker of the company.
spotted the commie
concurrence and commie don't work together, sorry mate.
> I would make a law for 50% of the board sits to be fill with worker of the company.
You too?
right now for a short time we live in a country where people have more choice of where they want to work than there is choice for employers which employee to select. this only happens during economic high conjuncture. and even now it mostly only applies to well educated work because for manual labor there are plenty of really cheap migrant workers from eastern europe
as soon as there is a small hit to the economy and unemployment goes back up to 5%, then employers will start the race to the bottom again, lets see who will do the most work for the least amount of money.
Do you think it is okay if someone invests 1 billion into his company and then shares his profits with people who came 2 months ago to work?
first of all thats completely besides the point, because loans exist, you could just write down that first the company needs to pay that 1 billion investment back before any profit sharing is done.
secondly, yes, because what the fuck else are you ever going to do with a billion dollars? buy 1000 houses of a million dollars each to live in? you can only live in 1 at a time. paying it to people to do work for you is the best possible way to spend it. you get more harder working employees and therefore better products and therefore even more money. everyone wins.
Yes, the one who invested his 1 billion in his company would share his profit with people who came 2 month ago. I don't see the problem :
Let's say only the investor and that new guy he hired work for the company. Let's say 100% of the profit are paid (not invested back into the company).
Then, the owner get 50% and the workers 50%. As being also a worker since a year that investor and that new worker being 2 month old, that investor gets 50*12/14 = 43% more while that 2 month old guy gets 7%
In this simplistic exemple, you see that investor only lose 7% to that worker.
That worker being responsible of 14% of all the work done by the company that year, I don't see how 7% of the reward would be unfair
I did in fact but if not all the people of my country then it is pointless.
Fucking lol at people still believing in the left/right illusion.
can't say exactly where but I'm on anywhere around center.
MLM
HUMANISM frend.
anyone who isnt centre-left/centre/centre-right is an idiot, sorry to inform you
Right > Left
Right, fuck the lefties in my country. Trying to ruin EVERYTHING lmao.
Liberalism ez
You know exactly where i stand baby.
Right Wing : Anti government, anti taxation, anti regulation, anti redistribution of wealth, anti-equalitarianism, PRO FREEDOM.
Left wing = all the idiots above except a few exceptions.
Alt Right = Anarcho Capitalism.
Nazis and Commies are both on the left, along with the fachistas ofc.
So therefore, im on the far right, almost alt right, Libertarian Minarchist.
i.imgur.com/hh92QkU.png
i.imgur.com/nFhryAF.png
I hate Keynesianism with all my gutts, mainly hate France, Denmark and Sweden the most in this planet, more than China and NK actually, and i cant wait for them to crash to hell to rejoice at all the idiotic arrogant leftist eating one big humble pie, or more so, one big humble dick.
ps: Liberalism is right winger, Miltron Friedman is Liberalism, what you refer to Liberal in the U.S is actually called Social Democrat (of social democracy).
Far-left
Brain won over feelings
18:00Sons Of Lennart vs fightclub
1.83
1.94
00:00Isurus vs RUFUS
1.31
3.34
11:00Vitality vs EHOME
1.16
5.95
