Thread has been deleted
Last comment
TRUMP IMPEACHMENT STARTING
 | 
United States ED_FROM_CHOWDER_HEADS 
twitter.com/BBCBreaking/status/120259214.. The impeachment is starting NOW. Sadly the brainwashed republicans will block everything against their orange daddy...
2019-12-05 15:35
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
its not gonna happen though axaxaxaxaxaxax nt
2019-12-05 15:36
+1
2019-12-05 15:52
+1
2019-12-05 16:03
+1
2019-12-05 20:14
thats what im saying you moron
2019-12-05 15:57
#33
 | 
United States reynCS
silence liberal.
2019-12-05 16:00
how is that what you're saying when you are saying brainwashed republicans and orange daddy lmaoo
2019-12-05 16:08
He also said that they would block everything, which means he doesn't think the impeachment will happen. So yes, that is what he's saying, and yes you are a moron.
2019-12-07 00:34
silence liberal.
2019-12-05 17:02
why you insult racist liberal
2019-12-05 17:05
silence liberal.
2019-12-05 17:16
#132
 | 
Europe tweekzter
Spending money and time for something that will never happen and maybe even make Trump look like the victim thereafter... smart.
2019-12-06 13:04
silence liberal.
2019-12-06 22:50
He'll definitely be impeached. The problem is the Republicans in the Senate are sucking on his pole and will rescue the traitorous criminal from being tossed out on his ass.
2019-12-05 20:10
#133
 | 
Europe tweekzter
That's how the rules are. Democrats know it. If they have nothing better to do...
2019-12-06 13:05
Yes, just as impeachment is a tool the House has too. The House has plenty to do, and it's done a lot. it's passed a lot of bills, but if the Senate won't floor them to be voted on, they won't get done, and that's what's happened.
2019-12-06 15:25
+1
2019-12-11 03:50
Democrats = 🤡
2019-12-05 15:36
So true. Fuck the country just try and take down Trump any way possible
2019-12-05 16:00
They just can't handle that someone that wasn't from their party was elected and have been throwing a temper tantrum ever since. Pathetic.
2019-12-05 17:07
were u not alive during obamas 2 terms LMAO
2019-12-05 20:20
The only news network giving him shit was FOX not every channel like it is now. Twitter squabble is to be expected for all presidents.
2019-12-05 20:24
its almost like media outlets have bias? and thats not the point u were making but lets act like it was
2019-12-05 20:26
Why u so mean ;( typical obamoid.
2019-12-05 21:47
#55
 | 
Israel DatBoiSus
As a foreigner looking from the side this is terrible. But Trump is doing a remarkable job fighting it.
2019-12-05 17:09
hahaha ofc the jesus Muslim is all about supporting Trump. makes sense cuz Trump's the only one who supports you guys stealing land from the Palestinians lmaooo
2019-12-06 22:22
#176
 | 
Israel DatBoiSus
You hate jewish people so much that you can't even say the word jewish? Btw i support trump because of his transparency, fight against true corruption, politically incorrectness and and human decency. He is not shallow like all other politicians. BTW i DONT support joe biden, which also supports israel, or other hypocrite politicians who support israel.
2019-12-06 22:38
What has Trump been doing to "fight true corruption" in your eyes? The only things I see him doing are staying at his own resorts, charging the Secret Service to stay in his own hotel rooms (where do you think that money goes??) Also seeing him talk to Russians about property deals while he's the President, meanwhile Jimmy Carter had to divest himself from his fucking peanut farm to prove that he wouldn't make business decisions to benefit him. But keep praying to Trump and Netanyahu, maybe one day you'll wake up and 80% of the civilized world won't hate you anymore (this won't happen)
2019-12-06 23:01
Democrats=🤡 Republicans=🤡
2019-12-05 17:07
humans = 🤡
2019-12-05 17:23
this.
2019-12-05 17:36
truu
2019-12-06 22:39
honk
2019-12-07 02:44
+1
2019-12-05 20:26
#90
 | 
United States YEP_COCK
all politicians bad
2019-12-05 20:11
+999999999 Nemo.
2019-12-06 22:04
wtf you are 15_yr_old_unfriendly_user_
2019-12-06 22:05
+111111111111111
2019-12-09 22:59
#3
 | 
Canada U_S_of_Gay
Imagine impeaching a top 5 president in US history
2019-12-05 15:36
He is not even top 5 in this decade
2019-12-05 15:36
liberals lmao, how can you not be top 5 if their were only 2 presidents this decade. btw he is definetly the best of this decade
2019-12-05 15:42
#27
 | 
Yugoslavia al0))
trouble getting the joke? rightards lmaooo
2019-12-05 15:55
+1
2019-12-05 15:57
+1
2019-12-05 16:01
+1 cuckservative too low IQ to get the joke
2019-12-05 16:14
It's beyond stupid to be funny, that's the difference, conservatives have their feet based on the ground where you guys fly around in a fluffy fantasy where everything is pink and fun, let me translate that for you... you have shit for brains!
2019-12-08 04:28
Hoes mad XD
2019-12-10 14:30
#251
 | 
Yugoslavia al0))
+1 XD
2019-12-10 15:44
The mad ones are those with Trump derangement syndrome, imagine going on and on for years on the Russia hoax even though they knew it was fake? Screaming to the sky? And now they are all covering up for corrupt Biden? Come on, are you guys insane or corrupt? pick one youtube.com/watch?v=jxrR6dmzpCI
2019-12-11 03:48
#259
 | 
Yugoslavia al0))
Hoes mad XD edit: ofc you send a rightard podcast guy hahaha get out of your bubble
2019-12-11 12:41
Well nothing wrong with conservatives only in the mind of crazies AKA libtards, it's you guys who's the divisive
2019-12-11 12:43
#261
 | 
Yugoslavia al0))
lel check this intro alone youtube.com/watch?v=lJ6zoVnAC38 just stop
2019-12-11 12:44
True, what's wrong with that?
2019-12-11 12:45
#264
 | 
Yugoslavia al0))
cant take you serious im sorry gl in life
2019-12-11 12:47
Dude, there's nothing wrong with his intro, if you think so then YOU are the racist.
2019-12-11 12:48
#266
 | 
Yugoslavia al0))
hahahahahahaahah XD
2019-12-11 12:49
You are hysterical.
2019-12-11 12:49
+1
2019-12-05 17:06
It is troll lmao geesh i counter with joke XD
2019-12-10 15:41
#249
 | 
Yugoslavia al0))
0/8 bt tho
2019-12-10 15:42
X(
2019-12-10 15:43
#112
 | 
Tunisia Respecc
No shit Sherlock
2019-12-05 20:37
-----------------------Joke 🤠->You /|\ / \
2019-12-10 14:44
#22
 | 
United States Grishh
Imagine living in a democracy where our government is so corrupt, that in order to retain power, they try to impeach someone for multiple reasons throughout a term. It's criminal.....
2019-12-05 15:50
every politician would have been hanged for treason if we would live 200 years back.
2019-12-05 15:58
#45
 | 
United States Grishh
that doesn't justify anything.....
2019-12-05 16:21
oh no wah wah wah. our president is democratically getting taken down! it's not like other countries presidents were assassinated or anything lol!
2019-12-05 17:07
#66
 | 
United States Grishh
oh because it happened to your country, it makes it not okay to complain about? You're quite the defeatist. So you're okay with one side of the isle gaining power by lying their way through impeachments? That's unhealthy.
2019-12-05 17:23
i think trumped lied more than the democrats lmao
2019-12-05 17:23
#70
 | 
United States Grishh
examples?
2019-12-05 17:25
quid pro quo
2019-12-05 17:25
#74
 | 
United States Grishh
yeah you def have no clue what you're talking about.... They requested military aid, before you can request military aid we would like to ensure that corruption in your government isn't an issue. Biden being involved in that was a side effect. I wouldn't expect you to think any differently considering the liberal media you watch.
2019-12-05 17:27
Well... check this out youtube.com/watch?v=EnEWYilDgcg
2019-12-08 04:34
ok cool + and - always make a -
2019-12-08 09:42
come to the UK, our government would not have even let Trump get into office. election would've been held off, until hes dead or someone different is chosen.
2019-12-06 21:38
"Top 5 in History"!!! LOLOLOL!. Get out of your Fox News bubble and see what those that study the Presidents have to say about him. In all polls on political scientists he comes either lowest-3 EVER! Usually, he's judged 2nd worst.
2019-12-05 20:12
not a good source given the overwhelming and overt political bias in social sciences (let alone the humanities). in fact, arguably (and to an extent provably) one of the most bias sources you can go to in the modern age, and that's just talking about their articles and assessment processes. Even ignoring the obvious bias. I cant believe anyone would take a poll of 'humanity experts' seriously on anything, given the overwhelmingly theoretical and subjective nature of their work. ask the Clintons how accurate polls are. the fact any of you are attempting to rank a president before hes finished his term, shows your stupidity.
2019-12-06 21:36
"Humanity experts" LOLOLOL!. You mean the people actually involved in creating future politicians and those studying the history of politicians? LOLOL. Wake up, man. if I were looking to see what the consensus scientific opinion on something like cancer research or the formation of heavy elements, I'd go to those experts that have studied it. This is the same. "ask the Clintons how accurate polls are" Oh, because THAT'S the same! LOL. The public at large is largely uninformed about most issues. Polls using a sample can suffer from poor methodology. Deciding to go to the experts in a field is not the same. That you cannot tell the difference is more than mildly amusing. "the fact any of you are attempting to rank a president before hes finished his term, shows your stupidity." When you want to ask people what they think about something, you have to wait until some arbitrary time in the future? Oh, don't worry. History will be brutal on Trump. Front and center will be his grade four level grammar and speech patterns, his making fun of the most vulnerable, going after his perceived opponents like a schoolboy, and foreign leaders laughing at him. History will show him either as a laughing stock or a terror.. depending on whether he is successful in accomplishing his desire to institute a neo-fascist dictatorship. I'm guessing he won't be able to.
2019-12-06 21:46
they play as big a role creating politicians as your average primary school teacher. I study history with a political focus (globally not American focused), so I think im in a better position to comment on the bias and therefore accuracy of these studies, given that I study them. the fact you think you can compare the scientific method and resulting studies with the studies of humanities shows how unfamiliar you are with the respective processes. I was talking about the polls asking who the public thought was gonna win their opinions on the candidates (why else would I mention the Clintons?)... your inability to approach anything rationally is painful. Furthermore you missed my obvious point that polls are not fact and don't even come close to the legitimacy of scientific polls. didn't read the rest of your rant after you said that you would have to wait until some arbitrary time, because once again you read what you think I mean rather than what I mean. no. I think you should wait to evaluate someones efficacy once they have finished the task at hand, by the same logic ill wait until Trump is no longer president to evaluate how good he was. parting words, google 'nuance'.
2019-12-06 22:02
" I think im in a better position to comment on the bias" I was also a Poli-sci major in college, but I wasn't trying to toot that horn. "therefore accuracy of these studies" If you were sampling some minor subset of citizens off the street you're going to get opinions based on their knowledge. When you go to those teaching political scientists to future politicians you'll get a more informed opinion. For instance, when asking about Evolution Theory do you go to some random set of people off the street to know if it's true or to biologists? "the fact you think you can compare the scientific method and resulting studies with the studies of humanities shows how unfamiliar you are with the respective processes." I think my point went COMPLETELY over your head. I essentially made it again directly above. There's a difference between asking some random person off the street and someone with knowledge on a subject. That shouldn't need to be explained. "I was talking about the polls asking who the public thought was gonna win their opinions" I recognize that. The polls asking a random sample were a bit off. It does happen every once in a while. Polls aren't terribly accurate (hence the use of 'margin of error'), but tend to be fairly so over time. "polls are not fact and don't even come close to the legitimacy of scientific polls" ... I didn't say polls were fact. I was saying that those whose professions are the studying of Presidential history and those teaching future lawyers and politicians themselves evaluate Trump as one of the worse. That's all I was saying. "wait until Trump is no longer president to evaluate how good he was" No doubt we can all evaluate how the guy did after the fact, but that doesn't mean we can't evaluate along the way.
2019-12-06 22:21
Yea either that guy doesn't understand English so he's making mistakes, or he's just really really stupid...
2019-12-06 23:24
once again youre conflating all the wrong ideas, and not actually reading what I am saying. I didn't study something as much of a joke a political science, only half way as funny (history). no wonder you trumpet so hard for their accuracy. I stopped after your first point where you once again completely misunderstood me again. fyi- who were the commentators on the American election? oh right, its the genius people working in the humanities... and what did they predict? aren't these the same people who nominated someone for a nobel prize for prolonging a war and illegal drone strike? just read some of your last comment from before, and I think its always ironic when someone attempts to predict that history will view something in a certain way. ill make it a little more simple for you: 1- those polls you reference are biased to the point of making them defunct (something you have been unable to deny let alone acknowledge). 2- polls generally are a terrible way to evaluate anything (theyre the poor mans index). 3- I like to hold my judgement till I have all the information. there should make it easier to not mix everything up.
2019-12-06 23:54
You do realize that those polls that had Hillary winning by ~2 points were actually correct, right? Hillary did in fact win the popular vote by over 2% (roughly 3 million votes), which shows that the polls were actually accurate, but I wouldn't expect a poli-sci major to be able to read data properly lmao.
2019-12-06 23:40
"those polls"... amazing how you refer to a group of things and then say they all had the same result (one could almost say it indicates bias). 99% of polls had Clinton winning by a margin (can only find one that says by 2 points, the rest were all by quite a bit more). the fact she does not win and all these polls agree, despite these polls supposedly branching the entire country and being used as a representation of the whole country. is only indicative of my point, it is not actually my point (which is why you've both conflated the wrong ideas). read 186 if youd like an explanation. edit- how about you go and read the beginning of this conversation if you want to understand whats happening before making inane contributions and making an argument out of something irrelevant to the discussion (ironic for something calling others stupid).
2019-12-06 23:57
hahaha "i can only find a source that says EXACTLY the same thing you said, but there HAS To be more!!!!" Dude, the entire Internet is at your fingers, there's no excuses to being this dumb lol. Also, what are you not understanding, a bunch of polls said she would win by ~2 points (in this case, a point = percentage point, in case you didn't know) and she DID win the popular vote by over 2%. Maybe if everyone is "conflating the wrong point" regarding what you're trying to say, it might just be the fact that you're retarded, not a misunderstanding on everyone else's part.
2019-12-07 00:36
'can only find one that says by 2 points, the rest were all by quite a bit more.' how bout you trying reading that one more time.. I didn't disagree with her winning the popular vote. I disagreed that many polls thought shed win by so little (as most polls did in fact suggest). hence the first point. two people =/= everyone. we can stop this here, youre arguing with the semantics of something that wasn't even a focal point of my argument (coincidentally ignoring all my actual points, standard) and acting like youre a statistician for understanding the basics... have a good one mate.
2019-12-07 01:22
hes not even the best president in 2017
2019-12-05 20:27
#163
 | 
United States Hindy
Lmao I support him and he’s not top 5 at all
2019-12-06 21:29
DUMB DEMOCRATS
2019-12-09 22:59
Trump is shit but Bernie is even worse.
2019-12-05 15:36
#69
 | 
United States Grishh
yeah, well the fact that you know so much about trump/american politics tells me your country doesn't have much in the way of a dependable government. And considering you're not in the US and a voting citizen, than your opinion doesn't matter, and or is void considering the media you watch is probably leftist propaganda like every other country gets fed these days.
2019-12-05 17:25
Leftist propaganda when he says Bernie is worse. Do you know how to read fat murican.
2019-12-05 20:18
#122
 | 
United States Grishh
left media has always been bad on bernie... they want warren or hillary. they don't care about bern you dumb fuck
2019-12-05 21:10
It's the corporate media not the left you dumb fuck
2019-12-05 21:15
all media in the states is political nowadays. theres little difference between corporate and political in the states.
2019-12-06 21:31
Who taught you that??? Fox...?
2019-12-09 23:14
It is bound to get shut down in the senate indeed, but at least it brings quite a bit of bad publicity.
2019-12-05 15:37
Republicans have no dignity.
2019-12-05 15:38
#15
 | 
Kuwait Onlytruth3
lmao. When bill clinton had monica lewinsky affair (that he lied about officially), and sexually assaulted a woman that he settled out of court, guess how many democrats voted for his impeachment? 0. What has Trump done to get impeached? Ask about corruption ?
2019-12-05 15:45
#60
 | 
United States syrup_god
he tried to extort a foreign leader to help his campaign, for starters
2019-12-05 17:14
#73
 | 
Canada Herodionus
And where's the proof for that?
2019-12-05 17:27
we cant get it because he wont release the call bud
2019-12-05 20:28
#109
 | 
United States CaliNinja
oh wait so there is no evidence ok thanks
2019-12-05 20:34
yes because he...is refusing to release the thing that would convict him lmaooo. yall are fucking stupid my god
2019-12-05 20:36
#111
 | 
United States CaliNinja
yes there isnt ok thanks for confirming
2019-12-05 20:37
yall would never say this shit if it was a democrat my god.
2019-12-05 20:38
#119
 | 
United States CaliNinja
same for you holy shit
2019-12-05 20:58
lmao so true, if it was obama he wouldnt be sayin this shit.
2019-12-06 19:47
Yes I would I fucked hated obama. Fuck you mean
2019-12-09 14:43
Rare to find someone who hates Obama AND Trump lmao sorry
2019-12-09 19:41
I ain't a dumb bitch who defends on party lines
2019-12-09 20:33
you should stay away from politics.
2019-12-06 21:30
LMAO +1
2019-12-07 01:50
He released the call tho, you can read it in full
2019-12-05 20:46
talking about monica lewinsky when trump has had what 40 of them and cheated on his white while in offce? ight then mate
2019-12-05 20:28
doesnt matter if Trump fced 200, I dont know how many he has or hasnt. I believe the figure is exaggarated in democrat grassbrain circles. What is important Bill Clinton lied about it during sworn deposition and he actually sexually assaulted women - charge he denied but was ready to pay 850k for her to shut up. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton%E2%80%93Le.. In 1994, Paula Jones filed a lawsuit accusing Clinton of sexual harassment when he was governor of Arkansas. Clinton attempted to delay a trial until after he left office, but in May 1997 the Supreme Court unanimously ordered the case to proceed and shortly thereafter the pre-trial discovery process commenced. Jones' attorneys wanted to prove that Clinton had engaged in a pattern of behavior with women that lent support to her claims. In late 1997, Linda Tripp began secretly recording conversations with her friend Monica Lewinsky, a former intern and Department of Defense employee, in which Lewinsky divulged that she had had a sexual relationship with the President. Tripp shared this information with Paula Jones' lawyers, who put Lewinsky on their witness list in December 1997. According to the Starr Report, after Lewinsky appeared on the witness list Clinton began taking steps to conceal their relationship, including suggesting she file a false affidavit, suggesting she use cover stories, concealing gifts he had given her, and helping her obtain a job to her liking. Clinton gave a sworn deposition on January 17, 1998, where he denied having a "sexual relationship", "sexual affair" or "sexual relations" with Lewinsky. He also denied that he was ever alone with her. His lawyer, Robert S. Bennett, stated with Clinton present that Lewinsky's affidavit showed that there was no sex in any manner, shape or form between Clinton and Lewinsky. The Starr Report states that the following day, Clinton "coached" his secretary Betty Currie into repeating his denials should she be called to testify. Bill Clinton making a presentation that ends with a short commentary on the Clinton–Lewinsky scandal. The presentation is known for the quote "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky." (6:22) After rumors of the scandal reached the news, Clinton publicly stated, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky."[5] Months later, Clinton admitted that his relationship with Lewinsky was "wrong" and "not appropriate". Lewinsky engaged in oral sex with Clinton several times.[6][7] The judge in the Jones case later ruled the Lewinsky matter immaterial, and threw out the case in April 1998 on the grounds that Jones had failed to show any damages. After Jones appealed, Clinton agreed in November 1998 to settle the case for $850,000 while still admitting no wrongdoing. upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/t..
2019-12-05 21:13
preach
2019-12-06 19:44
the thought that members/supporters of either party (aside from the people who actually vote on issues rather than tribalism) have dignity is laughable.
2019-12-05 15:48
Democrats have less. At least republicans have denounced the people who are blatant extremists/fascists. If youread the news you'd have heard the republicans denounced and kicked out their primary governor candidate because he suggested hanging his democrat rivals. Meanwhile the democrats refuse to denounce a radical Muslim in Congress who has repeatedly made blatantly anti-Semitic statements and has suggested the absolute destruction of the state of Israel.
2019-12-05 16:01
WHEN HAVE THEY DONE THIS EVER. and saying things that arent pro israel doesnt make them anti Israel
2019-12-05 20:29
Ilhan Omar and Rashida talib have both called for the destruction of the state of Israel. If that isn't anti Israel I don't know what is. Get informed liberal
2019-12-05 20:42
what was their direct quote? and when have republicans denounced fascists and WS, cuse iv never seen it
2019-12-05 20:43
Republicans denouncing candidate who proposed executing opponents: google.com/amp/s/amp.axios.com/republica.. Democrats being anti semeric: npr.org/2019/03/07/700901834/minnesota-c.. google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/03.. heritage.org/civil-society/commentary/ra.. Now if your going to disagree you could actually try doing 5 min of Google but I guess your 6 brain cell liberal brain couldn't comprehend the colors in their logo
2019-12-05 20:54
thats not antisemitism lmao snowflakes
2019-12-06 13:09
Expected from cuckland Denmark to not understand that Israel and Judaism aren't completely disconnected.
2019-12-06 15:04
cry is free JewSA
2019-12-08 01:37
Flair checks out. Monkey brain.
2019-12-08 04:18
neither of them are serious people though, and they do not have the support of most democrats. theyre fringe to the same extent as the alt-right. theyre all just amplified due to media and the inflammatory and idiotic stances they have which help media get hate clicks.
2019-12-06 21:28
Except the actual alt right doesn't have people chilling in Congress. The anti semetic left has 4 obvious ones and many closet ones.
2019-12-07 00:53
I agree with you on that. most of the world is anti-Semitic. I just don't think theyre the best example for anti-Semitism on the left, Corbyn and the Uk are much more obvious.
2019-12-07 01:16
Bad publicity for the democrats
2019-12-05 15:39
Hard to say tbh. The diehard voters on each side won't change because of this, but it may very well make the middle of the road voters make up their mind based off of the result.
2019-12-05 15:42
I hope those people see how democrats keep trying yet keep failing
2019-12-05 15:43
I'm not particulary a supporter of either side, but even I can see Trump is a shady motherfucker. I could swear every allegation is true as well as a whole lot more no one knows about yet.
2019-12-05 15:45
True, I dislike him as well but all other "TOP" candidates are socialists and that's a no-no for me.
2019-12-05 15:46
Yes, I'd like to see a bit more of a middle of the road thinking. In general politics has become way too polarised in the last 10 - 15 years. It's either extreme left or extreme right with no one picking the best of both and throwing out the faulty thoughts and ideals.
2019-12-05 15:48
The middle of the road are democrats like Biden Btw
2019-12-05 20:19
Biden was center left. He's migrated to a more fringe position between the center and most other candidates. Most center rn has to be gabbard. Bloomberg is a joke. Warren and Bernie are socialists. And Biden has sadly moved further left to appeal to more dems
2019-12-08 04:21
Tulsi is center left and biden is still center. And calling warren a socialist shows your political knowledge murica brain. Even Bernie Sanders is a Soc Dem for your knowledge.
2019-12-08 09:20
I'm sorry for saying that the person who has supported Venezuela, Cuba, and the USSR (all up until they failed may I add) believes socialism is the best way. Bernie has actually changed nothing in his policy between now and then too. He thinks the world is stupid. Don't believe what media tells you. He is a socialist through and through. Warren is just a slightly younger female Pocahontas version of Bernie.
2019-12-08 09:36
He has supported some of their policies and felt that they are humane but also criticized them. His policies are Soc DEm if you don't know the definition to socialism pls stop shitposting over politics. Also bringing up media Msnbc Cnn constantly attack him and guests have called him even a commie so this narrative that you get from fox or someone like Dave Rubin that CNN is left is false you could argue that they are Center-Left but they are really corporate liberals.
2019-12-08 09:41
I agree it's pathetic and all those attempts but this latest with Ukraine if it's true then he abused his power even Republicans can hardly defend that Major power who is actually a real democracy I suddenly thought of Russia had to edit😂) (I'm not 100 in on everything happening but I got the part where he withheld funds) which I don't care how pathetic the Democrats is but that's both illegal and not a road I'd like to see the leader of a major power take so I hope he either gets rid off or lose next election should this fail
2019-12-05 17:18
I can only imagine what would've happened if Hillary got the presidency...
2019-12-06 20:01
Even if it does get blocked in Senate he still will have been impeached. My issue is that I want Trump gone (so pence can take his place and run in 2020) but I also want the democrats to fail. I don't know who to root for...
2019-12-05 15:56
Tough one there.
2019-12-05 16:06
Just hope for a Utopia where all democrats and republicans kill each other and you can start from 0 with more than 2 relevant political parties
2019-12-05 19:50
give a couple years. minus the civil war (hopefully), theres gonna have to be an explosion of new parties in the coming years (at least in the UK, US and France). the distance between (the two) political parties and reality are increasingly distant. theres no representation for centrists (who are increasing in number due to the polarised nature of politics rn and the rejection of those not steeped in dogma by both parties). both parties are stagnating and the ideological contest has run its course. to the point where parties no longer try to convince the other side but create a wall to prevent their own from leaving. Elections are soon gonna be a shit slinging/personality contest (even more than already if you can imagine) which is just gonna show how braindead and unimaginative the majority of those in government are. leading to a hopeful return of the nerds. or a reintroduction of senates as the ultimate power, with the role of nation leaders just becoming whichever pop star is the most popular.
2019-12-06 21:23
#194
 | 
Bulgaria CHAPOLE!
Literally no representation for centrists even though in the last 2 decades we've had Bill and Hillary Clinton, Obama and now the frontrunner being Biden. Those people are two policies away from being considered right wingers , so much about your silly comments
2019-12-07 01:27
Bill is the only good option. if Obama wasn't black or a good speaker he wouldn't have had nearly as much support, policies were non-existent from the start and ended in trash fires (starting with putting more troops into wars he promised to end, unsanctioned drone strikes, liberal use of whistle-blower laws to fuck over the media and the continued tanking of the American economy, Obamacare (though the efficacy of obamacare is up for debate)). fortunately, all covered by the tragedy that was Bush and the joke that is Trump. Clinton is only a centrist in so far as shes basically the most corrupt, corporate machine in American politics. Biden is terrible representation for anyone. Only reason Obama is almost as close to good representation for rational politics is because he talked a good game (and was literally a good physical representation). Bill talked a good game and had effective middle road policies. even then this is all history. I believe I said there 'is' no representation...idk how long youre gonna be trolling my comments but please keep up.
2019-12-07 01:37
#134
 | 
Europe tweekzter
I am sure people will like all that effort for nothing. Democrats have been whining since 2016. Nothing else.
2019-12-06 13:08
preach
2019-12-06 20:02
Its funny that people ACTUALLY think he is going to get impeached. Democrats are trying so hard but fail everytime. Its kinda pathetic honestly XD
2019-12-05 15:39
#14
 | 
United States Itskickz
It is pathetic
2019-12-05 15:43
Think of it this way: If they bring up some very damning evidence, and the majority of the senate dont vote in favor, then that just shows how corrupt they are which would damage the republican party in future elections. They have nothing to lose.
2019-12-05 20:59
#136
 | 
Europe tweekzter
Fun fact. The Ukrainien president said there was no pressure. He probably is working for Trump as well... lol
2019-12-06 13:10
I mean if he would say there was huge pressure, he would get criticized from everybody for helping Trump. So there is no benefit for him for saying the truth (assuming there really was smth)
2019-12-09 20:22
2019-12-06 02:30
#12
cyx | 
South Africa bonkaz
Won't happen, will strengthen him and we'll get another 4 years of racist comedy gold, filled with lies, corruption and an economic house of cards that will collapse - hopefully during his second term. Good stuff.
2019-12-05 15:42
the cognitive dissonance is incredible. if hes guilty of all this shit (particularly corruption), why wouldn't he be found out? don't confuse the 1st and 3rd world, we hold those in power accountable. you just need proof.
2019-12-05 15:46
Do you actually expect common sense from a communism supporter?
2019-12-05 15:50
#39
cyx | 
South Africa bonkaz
Democratic socialist, please. Not everything that goes against neoliberalism is communism, mate.
2019-12-05 16:05
"neoliberalism"
2019-12-05 20:07
#37
cyx | 
South Africa bonkaz
Let's see if republicans have the balls to hold him accountable. If you really think that he didn't break the law with his antics in regards to Ukraine alone, you're delusional. And still the republicans will block everything. Nothing will happen.
2019-12-05 16:02
I don't think anyone broke the law until it is proven otherwise. I think people have said a lot of stuff about Trump with nothing close to serious corruption or violations of law being proven so far (despite there being an obvious bias against trump amongst intelligence agencies in America, which fyi would mean if there was anything it would've been found). its called innocent till proven guilty... welcome to the 1st world. btw congrats on being so fucked in the head that literally all you read from my statement was me saying he didn't do anything... I don't know whether or not he did anything but im not so stupid to assume anything. edit- the only legitimate threats to the foundation of democracy have been the actions of the western left over the last couple years. 1st with the complete denial of one of the most one sided votes in the last 50 years of british history. 2nd with the constant and seemingly unfounded attempts at impeaching a president by the other political party, 20 years after their leader was caught actually lying and breaking oath and they did nothing.
2019-12-05 16:17
Thank god, at least one person with some actual common sense
2019-12-05 19:53
its shocking to me the number of people who are just wrapped up in the sensationalist crap and are letting our democratic values and justice system rot around us. literally everyone in this thread is going into these situations with assumptions about how everything is going to play out or outright say they want their outcome due to their personal feelings, and its shocking. furthermore, they all assume to have accurate knowledge when theyre as detached from the situation as one could be. the last 100 years of political history, I think, are the most damning chapters of humanity.
2019-12-06 02:25
holy crap didn't have to roast my man that hard. An actual intellectual in these comments.
2019-12-06 20:07
#137
 | 
Europe tweekzter
I think most people are just annoyed by the whining democrats pull off since 2016. I am pretty sure Trump asked them too look into Hunter Biden and corruption, but I don't think there was too much pressure.
2019-12-06 13:15
#24
 | 
United States dckjavis
but why drumpf in peach? drumpf too big peach too small? how will drumpf fit?
2019-12-05 15:53
I want Trump impeached but I dont want the democrats to win. Feelsbadman
2019-12-05 15:53
imagine pence as a president. oh god if that happens Warren is going to be the president
2019-12-05 17:10
Warren has fallen harder than Olympus. She fell faster than harder my dick was last night. She fell harder than mjolnir. If either of the two buttfucking socialists win it'll be Bernie now
2019-12-05 19:47
bernie is aight. he has a funny accent
2019-12-05 21:18
#58
 | 
Israel DatBoiSus
Well that's not very smart of you. Because in your case it's either trump or radical socialist left
2019-12-05 17:11
Or pence or SANFORD. If trump can't run itll probably be between pence (who is actually a well respected conservative unlike Trump) and Biden/buttigeig (I have no idea if I'm spelling it right guys name is retarded). Now if pence gets dragged into impeachment it'll likely be one of the other republicans running. I'm hoping Sanford comes through.
2019-12-05 19:45
#84
 | 
Israel DatBoiSus
No republican is as loved as trump tho. With insanely amount of hate, trump has got a hell lot of supporters than other republicans ever will. It's just my opinion but i feel like with other republican, democrats might just win easily
2019-12-05 19:51
#26
 | 
Canada Herodionus
If he is actually guilty then I don't think he'd have any supporters left, however when the only evidence they have is someone heard from someone who thought that someone thinks that he wanted quid pro quo, he won't be impeached, it's called innocent until proven guilty
2019-12-05 15:54
I actually think even if theres something, the republicans wouldnt vote against him. You dont just switch sides from the trump church to the antitrump church
2019-12-09 20:27
The thing though is that you can apply that to both sides, whether he's guilty or not, most of just supporters will vote for him, and his opponents will vote against him. Similarly because the evidence is circumstantial, both sides claim they are right, I highly doubt there will be any proof to prove either side right
2019-12-09 22:14
yeah sure
2019-12-09 22:58
I can see that the left in the US is not much different the the ones in other places. they are all whiny sore losers. Cannot accept they lost anything, any votings, so they spent the entired time, 7 days a week, 24 hours a day, crying and blaming something else for losing the elections.
2019-12-05 15:59
#41
 | 
Bulgaria goatse
making fun of people's skin color is not cool mens. you should know that as a liberal
2019-12-05 16:06
This is gonna blow up in the leftist's faces, Trump 2020 winner already.
2019-12-05 17:04
Who 🚗🚗🚗🚗
2019-12-05 17:06
Bro it's your country
2019-12-10 14:46
So? My country is full of a bunch of idiots who have no clue what’s best for them. Anyway this election goes won’t matter because we still won’t have the best person for the job. And trump won’t get impeached, there isn’t enough hard evidence to do it. All that’s happening now is democrats making themselves look bad.
2019-12-10 19:23
trump 2020
2019-12-05 17:09
Trump 2020, get rekt sjw
2019-12-05 17:09
#62
 | 
Netherlands Im_gaaayyy
No quid pro quo and definitely no obstruction of Justice. you filthy Democrats have been trying to impeach him for almost 3 years without any impeachable evidence!!! Butthurt sjw.
2019-12-05 17:16
antifa braindead fucks
2019-12-05 17:25
this surely is the end of trump
2019-12-05 17:26
look at my name, he deserves to be impeached
2019-12-05 17:32
This thread needs some facts so imma just leave this here, anyone who is claiming that there is a "lack of evidence" should look at this: npr.org/2019/11/09/776173492/the-whistle..
2019-12-05 17:46
The government is full of pussies
2019-12-05 19:48
+1
2019-12-05 19:49
#86
 | 
United States _ATaXiA_
Look at all the scared republicunts, To see how many of you incels don't believe that he committed at the VERY least bribery as confirmed by Transcripts, His chief of Staff and HIMSELF is more reason why i support mandatory breeding laws.
2019-12-05 20:05
congrats on having the same amount of intellect as the people who voted for Trump in the Rust Belt. (give it a couple years and youll understand)
2019-12-06 02:18
#130
 | 
United States _ATaXiA_
The fuck you getting at inbred? You make a reply that makes no fucking sense at all. (give it a couple years and you'll understand, you millennial twat)
2019-12-06 04:10
you support the introduction/implementation of a policy that's actually geared towards fucking you... nice that im the inbred, millennial though... coming from the person referring to hundreds of millions as incels, calling for eugenics (when realistically low iq and highly emotional/irrational individuals such as yourself would be targeted) and who fails to understand a primary tenet of our justice system (innocent till proven guilty). introduce one more edge and youd be calling me a zoomer or some shit. what is it is with dumbfucks and psychological projection and sensationalism? please explain. edit- you fake flagging? cus normal English speakers don't say 'make a reply'...
2019-12-06 13:04
#138
 | 
United States _ATaXiA_
In the eyes of the house he's guilty, In the eyes of the majority of the public he's guilty. The evidence to which the GOP can't disprove makes him guilty. So just because you turn a blind eye to it doesn't make it any less real. I can't answer any questions aimed towards your kind, you'll need to look at yourself to find that answer for yourself and the rest of your dumb-fuck brood. No I'm not fake flagging, "Cus" normal English speakers don't say "what is it is with". If you want to get in to grammar and punctuation match because you've lost the argument be my guest but please use proper English and grammar yourself first. Starting sentences without capitalizing -1-2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 Misuse of commas -1 -2 Missed apostrophe -1 -2 Misuse of ellipsis -1 -2 -3 Run on sentences -1 -2 -3 Misuse of Brackets -1 You want so badly to be smart, you bullshit it pretty well. Anyone with very little college level English or writing can tell how uneducated you really are. You are the epitome of a trump supporter. Uneducated, Poor and socially inept.
2019-12-06 13:37
so an obvious typo is the same as a misuse of the actual language? only Europeans make fundamental mistakes like 'make a reply', its on the same level as frenchies saying 'open the light'. wow my punctuation isnt 100% correct on an internet forum... how will my ego hold up? didn't really read after the first point cus its clear how mentally ill you are... hf in the camps youll vote for. fyi, not even a trump supporter, I just support due process, law and democracy. pretty wild stuff nowadays, I know. since most of what you say is nonsense and purely self serving drivel. how about we play a game? you guess my level of education and social status... and ill laugh since theyre both higher than yours will ever be.
2019-12-06 14:54
#141
 | 
United States _ATaXiA_
Ok Trumpet.
2019-12-06 14:56
idk what that means but... 1. you still surprised the dems lost? 2. im truly buckled that you ever tried to call anyone a millennial. hf working 9-5 and then apparently crying 5-9 for the rest of your life.
2019-12-06 15:04
#147
 | 
United States _ATaXiA_
Ok Trumpet.
2019-12-06 18:18
#192
 | 
Bulgaria CHAPOLE!
Lmao, you really are a fucking retard, recycling the same insults over and over while dickriding Trump
2019-12-07 01:21
not insults. diagnoses. why not continue from where we left off? oh that's right youre a vacuous twat who cant hold thoughts together long enough to form a point, so come to other threads and comments so you can make inane comments. btw pls show me where I dickride Trump? the only reason you think so, is because im not stupid enough to condemn someone based off of information comparable to hearsay. not immature enough to condemn someone before finding out all the information. and not naïve enough to think Clinton was a good candidate.
2019-12-07 01:27
#196
 | 
Bulgaria CHAPOLE!
You don't care about climate change denial, you dont care about bribaries what do you actually care about ? And The typical conservative pivot of "but the dems love HIlary". As i said Hilary is a centrist and im liberal so i probably don't support her unless its against a total buffoon
2019-12-07 01:37
I care about climate change, idgaf what Trump says about it. so what if he denies it? Hes not an authority on the matter, nor is he gonna stop the wide consensus of scientists. Before you say its cus hes pulled out of the Paris treaty, its not like the paris treaty is gonna do fuck all, just look at the numerous other climate treaties throughout history. Plus the US isn't even the biggest polluter. I care about briberies that have been PROVEN. how do you still not understand the concept of innocent till proven guilty? if that's a typical pivot for you, you've been hanging out with or learning about idiots. tbh reading back what you've said, idk how you come up with this shit but were done talking forever. Firstly, you just come up with random shit out of nowhere and attribute it to me, like youre having two conversations with me but im only involved in one. secondly, your ability to hold a coherent conversation is on the same level as a 16 yo on Adderall that hasn't slept in three days (coming from personal experiences) and its mindboggling.
2019-12-07 01:49
#201
 | 
Bulgaria CHAPOLE!
You're trying so so hard to sound intelligent and condecending but it doesn't really work when you seem to lack any sort of common sense. Paragraphs of strawmen and 0 substance whilst calling me out for pivoting somehow, quite the achievement. It's about as much as i can take from your galaxy brain takes
2019-12-07 01:56
kid youre legitimately mentally ill. fyi I was referencing "And The typical conservative pivot". seriously mate. I just came back to tell you, you have a legitimate mental sickness, go get yourself diagnosed (if youre older than 18 that is).
2019-12-07 02:06
Don't think it's gonna accomplish anything but hoping it will
2019-12-05 20:09
Lol trump is innocent... do u even watch tim pool? Moderate democrat says that he has done nothing wrong lol
2019-12-05 20:12
can you stop with the fake news pls
2019-12-05 20:13
ends in the senate. everyone with a brain can see this. but lets write about getting rid of him for hateclicks.
2019-12-05 20:13
obviously won't pass the Senate, but it's interesting. to all the trumpets complaining that there's no proof, you realize the WH is preventing a number of key people from even participating in the inquiry? if there's nothing to hide, why not let them testify? i voted for Trump in 2016 because Shillary Clinton is horrible, but i would not vote for him again in 2020 - he's hardly delivered on many of the things he campaigned on
2019-12-05 20:18
idk if you know what proof is (in legal terms).
2019-12-06 15:21
He hasn't delivered because the left have done literally nothing for 3 years but block everything he does and try to impeach him. No one on the left is even trying to work with him.
2019-12-06 18:20
#154
 | 
United States PP_Bizon
same could be said about the right too, I don't get the impression that they like him either, or are for the things he wants
2019-12-06 19:52
#225
 | 
Cyprus SexeSnek
Not really, most republicans approve of him
2019-12-09 20:11
If there's nothing to hide why not let Biden testify, I mean the whole ordeal started with investigations into him for corruption
2019-12-09 22:16
They're just trying to destroy the credibility of the republican party. Obviously the senate wont impeach him but by bringing up some very credible evidence they can show the country how corrupt they are for not doing it.
2019-12-05 20:56
The final episode in show for exposing the corrupted power hungry clowns is set. Let's watch how ridiculously those actors can dance.
2019-12-05 21:15
Useless democrats have nothing better to do. It wont pass the senate anyway xaxaxaxaxaxa
2019-12-06 13:42
Can't impeach Leto the second
2019-12-06 14:57
So the left is gonna waste more millions and find nothing. The left has done literally nothing in 3 years but go after Trump which have failed time and time again. Glad to see how useless the left is.
2019-12-06 18:20
for like the third time now?
2019-12-06 20:08
honk honk
2019-12-06 21:26
dont care virgin lol !!
2019-12-06 21:32
who cars? its not like hes going to leave office or anything
2019-12-06 21:38
Kkkkkkkk that's so 3rd world
2019-12-06 22:43
Anyone else just excited that we are alive to witness a President's impeachment? It has happened just twice in the history of the country, pretty rare occurrence.
2019-12-06 22:46
"IT'S HAPPENING FOR REAL THIS TIME I SWEAR!"
2019-12-06 23:05
he's gone for sure, the walls are closing in right at this moment
2019-12-07 02:10
#222
 | 
Cyprus SexeSnek
yeah ofc
2019-12-09 20:09
#200
 | 
Brazil Exfm
Why Impeach the best president ever?
2019-12-07 01:55
#221
 | 
Cyprus SexeSnek
cause they cant win against him
2019-12-09 20:08
long story short dems went all in on biden / buttigieg and threw warren & sanders under the bus. since warren & sanders are complete nutjobs maybe it's a wise move. buttigieg being a gay version of obama seems like a winning formula, but will it work twice?
2019-12-07 02:40
#219
 | 
Cyprus SexeSnek
Dont care, he wont be charged. Brainwashed left thinking they will do anything lmfao
2019-12-09 20:07
lmao it's been like 3 years and the democrats still can't get over the fact that Trump won.
2019-12-09 20:10
#231
 | 
Cyprus SexeSnek
+1 "dont be sore losers when hillary wins"
2019-12-09 20:29
+1 psychos
2019-12-11 03:50
wtff they put him in peach wtff
2019-12-09 20:11
Soft soft race.
2019-12-11 12:47
TYLOO
1.11
Beyond
6.20
Liquid
1.42
Cloud9
2.86
R!OT
2.04
Mako
1.74
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.