Thread has been deleted
Last comment
GrEta THUMBerg The PERson Of The YEAR
Europe Ninjatek 
Lol wtf a kid who dont understand how this world working and that u cant fix everything by just talking about it and , she is probably getting used by her parents like a buisness project Im kinda scared 4 this world
2019-12-10 18:05
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
ok
2019-12-10 18:06
no , its actually not ok thats pretty bad
2019-12-10 18:07
oh ok
2019-12-10 18:07
Thats bad men :(
2019-12-10 18:08
But yea nominating her for person of the year is kinda dumb imo
2019-12-10 18:10
+1
2019-12-10 18:11
Yeah cuz a) shes kinda dumb b) ChrisJ clearly person of the year
2019-12-10 21:59
ChrisJ person of the decade mens)
2019-12-10 22:12
#137
 | 
United States Gryff1n76 
ChrisJ person of the century
2019-12-10 23:32
#174
 | 
World Nastradoomus 
ChrisJ = Jesus Christ obviously.
2019-12-11 06:52
#194
cyx | 
Germany Shadyy89 
Christ, Jesus. How could I never see this before. Thank for enlightening me
2019-12-11 11:10
+1
2019-12-11 17:37
+1
2019-12-11 19:52
ChristJ
2019-12-13 14:05
Stalin should get it
2019-12-12 16:46
i mean ppl that bombed the living shit out of middle east get nobel price for peace. this is the irony of the world we're living in. its all an illusion, im calling it already. probably one ancient egyptian person took so much hallucinating shit that we're just him hallucinating nothing real. enjoy till u die
2019-12-13 20:23
#201
 | 
Finland TuureBoelius 
Isn't the ok hand sign a fascist hate symbol ?!?!?!??!?!?!?!
2019-12-11 12:55
I didn't use the hand symbol. I only used the word "ok"
2019-12-11 13:52
nice dog-whistling you should get banned, fucking nazi
2019-12-11 19:48
:((( content
2019-12-11 20:27
#278
 | 
United States ColdBlooded 
hopefully you're joking
2019-12-11 19:49
the ok hand sign is obviously a symbol of white supremacy
2019-12-16 00:27
#2
 | 
Other wholelottared 
ok
2019-12-10 18:06
No its NOT
2019-12-10 18:07
ok
2019-12-10 18:08
not ok at all
2019-12-10 18:08
#11
 | 
Germany MackyGee 
ok
2019-12-10 18:08
its not funny anymore stop
2019-12-10 18:09
#20
 | 
Germany MackyGee 
ok
2019-12-10 18:17
#29
 | 
United States sorcrcrc 
ok
2019-12-10 18:31
ok
2019-12-10 20:11
#15
 | 
Sweden flippig 
Ok
2019-12-10 18:10
#17
 | 
India h4rd^ 
K
2019-12-10 18:11
She's making people talk about those issues. I guess that's a good thing.
2019-12-10 18:14
#195
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
No, it’s not. IPCC warned ous some years ago that excision rebellion (lefties activisme group) is taking there report out if context, to do fear propaganda through doomsday-preacher. And we Norwegians and Swedish people know that Greta’s family are connected to these small radical groups. Greta even tried to sue my country Norway for looking for oil, but the truth is, Oil is the future even if we dont use it for energy or transport. She lost the court against Norway because they know this is fear propaganda in order to make people aware of there footprint, what is okey, but bad when they try to stop industries from doing there work. Norwegian oil fund have a rule that you cannot invest in some anti-green stuff. Like, coal industry. And trust me, the oil industry invest in very much around the world. We currently only 4% of the global stockmarket. And also, the oil money have invested in massive pro-green projects and comapines in Brazil. Where we have been able to save the planet for 74 times more co2 than we have release since 1960 til today. So you can say that Norwegian oil money make the world green. That’s why she lost the case against Norwegian.
2019-12-11 11:14
You are talking only about your country, and its good that Norwegian oil fund invests in green projects. But what about other countries, who only exploit nature? And its good that people talk about problems, nothing wrong with that
2019-12-11 17:03
#334
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
Yes, exactly. This is why Greta is useless, goes after Norway who is the greenest country on earth. She also goes after Sweden, Finland, Island, Danmark, Germany, France, countries who have made a set plan on reduce co2. You said «But what about other countries, who only exploit nature?» well, it’s simple. Greta cannot go to China and protest peacefully, nor Venezuela, Iran, Qutar, basically all nations China are allied with, and Saudi Arabia who isnt allied with China. So Greta simplely ignore these countries as she cannot go there protest them without being prisoned. Greta is uselss, she doesn’t do anything other complain on countries that already have a set plan, and ignore the worst countries who release the mosr co2. Without USA.
2019-12-12 07:41
Oil is most definitely not the future. You are going into that with Norwegian eyes - since that is what has made you one of the richest countries in the world. Naturally, you want to preserve that wealth and standard that you have developed. Oil will eventually be phased out. The only way to secure your economy is by investing in higher-skilled workers and shifting resource dependency to renewable sources. Greate is most definitely not controlled by her parents or any other organization. This has been disputed many times. Anyone who followed her from the start can attest to that. Greate is a win-win situation. Sure she is not a scientist, but that is not the point. People have not been listening to scientists for decades on this matter - hence she simply put a voice and face to the matter and to the generation who is truly really going to feel the impact of what we have been doing to this earth for the past century. People are now discussing the matter more than they did in the past - resulting in more politicians and business leaders listening to scientists - the experts on the matter. That governments are then still too slow to implement real change, is a whole different matter relating to the fact they only truly care about their current and next term in office.
2019-12-12 15:38
#384
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
That you believe oil isnt the future only explain how you been washed by the climate agenda. Oil will always be needed, even if it’s not used for Transport or Energy. Oil only stand by 15% our wealth today, the oil only boosted our economic. But the Fish industry (salmon specially), Hydro powerplant and own 4% of the global stock market is what truly make ous rich. The saudis, americans and venezuelean are addicted to oil, Norway isnt. Oil is future, oil pumping will never be abolished.
2019-12-13 13:54
#390
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
Greta is useless. She is what IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) warned ous about. She’s a doomsday preacher, she was setup by Bo Thorén to make money for small climate org. She is not a win-win, she is a win-lose. Oil will be needed for Tesla cars and other electric cars, and oil will be used for painting, oil will be used for medicine medisine. Oil will be specially needed for making battery, fixing roads, building houses and buildings, and oil will also specially be used for AI robots and Massive industry machines. Oil will for sure be gone as a way to transport and create energy. There is no climate scientist saying the world will go under, only activist and nonsense talk politicans, but there is many climate scientist saying that we are in a global warming. But there is also very many saying global cooldown will come back as normal.
2019-12-13 14:23
#392
 | 
Portugal Bubulatikas 
And actually, these climate change alarmists are kinda doing the same that "scientists" did when talking about the end of the world in 2000 and 2012. They "predicted" 2000 to be the end of the world, failed miserably and said they were mistaken and 2012 was the real end. Failed again, now this bullshit with more space of time to make it seem more realistic...
2019-12-13 14:29
#405
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
Rememeber all these bullshit today comes from the left. - all radical Feminist are from left - All social justice warriors are from the left - All vegans are from the left - All predict the world will go under cuz global warming comes from the left - All communist lovers are on the left - All trans (males to female) supporters in female sports are from the left, you legit have males 9’3 230ibs destroying females in sport now. That’s because of the left. ruin woman sport n shit. The left is going full nuts. And trump is surfing on them with trolling, what is life today, it’s all a satire.
2019-12-13 20:21
LOL. Clearly Greta understands more than you do. Just the fact that you know of her and that everyone else here does as well illustrates she has made a big difference. She has managed to help bring awareness to the climate change problem - and she has done so in a way which has reached many people which had so far been difficult to touch. She is a hero.
2019-12-10 18:17
cringed and bluepilled
2019-12-10 18:20
Oh another woke genius right here who through his intellect alone sees through all the fog and laughs about all of those cringy sheep. AMIRITE
2019-12-10 23:35
nt globalist
2019-12-10 23:42
Let me just inform you that the cringy bluepilled one here is you.
2019-12-10 23:45
imagine taking anything a person ashamed of his country says seriously
2019-12-10 23:49
Imagine deflecting from the argument because you have no argument yourself you pathetic little kid. No, I am not ashamed of it, I used to display it, but not displaying it has kept many more idiots from deflecting from the actual argument onto making fun of my flag, which annoyed me, coz I want to debate as thoroughly as possible. Still, there are some fags like you that then cry about me not showing flag, but its fewer.
2019-12-10 23:51
abloo bloo bloo
2019-12-10 23:52
not me who started cryin about it
2019-12-11 00:00
#160
 | 
France OtelloO 
Don't waste time with him, he's polish so he probably believes that Satanists homosexuals are conspiring against Christianity and CC is a hoax set up by Jews to steal more taxpayers money. Or something like that
2019-12-11 03:23
Yeah thats almost certainly pretty accurate.
2019-12-11 19:10
#410
 | 
Europe JameTimer 
imagine not being ashamed of a country that is literally the only one that rejected the EU plan to reduce carbon emissions
2019-12-14 12:57
You’re from Poland, you have nothing to be proud about as a country.
2019-12-11 03:35
They withstood the world terror during the WII, that's quite something, not like losing a war to birds, just saying. That came from you.
2019-12-11 06:26
Withstood? They didn't completely get annihilated, that's about all you can say
2019-12-11 17:36
Rather withstood, stayed united as a nation and did all they could to survive and make the most out of it, it was a warring nation like those who occupied it and those who liberated it.
2019-12-13 02:30
And they got steam rolled within days, large parts of their population killed etc and after it was over it took them 45 years to become independent again and even to this day the entire country is a shit hole
2019-12-13 06:27
The others were backed by the US, Poland was struggling with the Soviets who seem to have mistreated them and yet they are now good, nicely developing country.
2019-12-13 10:01
Strongly disagree with the last part there but whatever
2019-12-13 13:25
Among those who they're surrounded by, I stand by my words.
2019-12-13 14:08
Even then that's not even vaguely true. They have Germany to the west and other countries they aren't really better than on some other sides.
2019-12-13 14:59
Germany and other countries haven't been covered by the Soviets nor have been damaged the most, it's still significantly better than taking a high ground being nobody, nowhere, losing to emus.
2019-12-13 15:00
No she is getting used by her parents or other adults , and no she is dont understand how everything is working , wanna know why? Cuz she is a fckng child
2019-12-10 18:22
and no she is dont understand
2019-12-10 21:05
Another climate change denier trying to deflect.
2019-12-10 21:35
im not denying it , im just say thats she is stupid af
2019-12-10 21:37
Then it because you haven't understood what she has managed to do. Think about it - how many times do you know of a young person that got to speak at the UN? That has managed to make even Americans on the right talk about climate change?
2019-12-10 21:46
Cuz they are kids , they dont rly know how it hard to do smthglike that in this world
2019-12-10 21:48
Maybe, maybe not. However trying is a damn lot better than not trying. Sometimes not being disillusioned is a good thing. I wonder if we are already sort of part a point of no return, meaning that climate change is gonna accelerate until there is no more ice to melt, the gulf streams have changed and more. So one could ask "Why bother?", only considering what is at stake we need to try even if places like China, USA, Poland and many others do very little.
2019-12-10 21:55
i dont think she is trying , i pretty sure she is buisness project and she/her parents/ppl behind her are just making money
2019-12-10 22:00
How would they be making money?
2019-12-10 22:06
#251
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
propaganda
2019-12-11 19:24
Your need a dictionary. Propaganda does not generate money.
2019-12-11 19:40
#268
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
you need a dictionary*. Propaganda gives a lot of money tho lol, how could it not give propaganda? TV gives money btw
2019-12-11 19:42
only together we can solve a problems like that , and what she doing tearing ppl apart (left and right)
2019-12-10 22:01
She is only tearing at those which are doing nothing, so no damage done.
2019-12-10 22:25
#252
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
is damage, she wants to stop the climate change bla bla bla, the only way is assembling the people and she is stupid af and she's 16 yo who knows nothing about the results of what she's done
2019-12-11 19:25
Seems more like you know nothing. How about you list what wrong things she has said.
2019-12-11 19:46
#277
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
i didnt say she said wrong things, in fact, she said things that i already knew but she hasnt made any difference since she is not giving any solution to the problem, she's an activist who even inspired kids to... skip school?
2019-12-11 19:48
#161
 | 
France OtelloO 
Dude, the whole point of her action and speeches is "DON'T LISTEN ME, LISTEN SCIENCE AND DO WHAT SCIENTISTS SAY" and still thousands of not millions of cockmunchers keep talking endlessly about her, her autism or how bad it is for her personnald envelopment to waste her time doing this ... It's like people don't care about the message all they want is shoot the messenger
2019-12-11 03:26
#254
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
the way she speaks, the way she refers to the people, the way she treats with the people, and the actions she takes are the reasons why she is "attacked" she never said listen to science, since she isnt saying anything new, everyone knows about the climate change. This girl isnt helping at all, is just making the people rage because of how she acts with everything
2019-12-11 19:27
#288
 | 
France OtelloO 
Once again, you shoot the messenger
2019-12-11 20:09
#291
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
aint shooting anybody, she is shooting the leaders for no reason. She has to take actions, not split empty words.
2019-12-11 20:11
#250
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
have you ever thought that they parents are rich and they gain access to wherever they want so the child goes and says stupid things? do you think that she's the only one thinking that climate change exists? do you think that she is a hero for doing what everyone does but in a retarded way?
2019-12-11 19:23
For starters she is not doing anything in a retarded way. Claiming so is however retarded. And what does it matters what her parents are doing, it does not change she is right and have managed to put climate change into a lot of peoples thought - including lots of people which was not even paying attention. Also how many times have you addressed say the UN. Zero, so clearly just by that not everyone is doing what she does.
2019-12-11 19:39
#267
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
money is all in this world, and she has it thx to her parents, and does nothing but annoy the people
2019-12-11 19:41
Does this matter if she is stupid or not? She is making a difference
2019-12-11 17:06
i dont like it cuz everybody think that she is a hero , when she is just stupid kid
2019-12-11 18:18
How is she stupid?
2019-12-11 19:40
#282
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
stupid since she does what everyone did before and doesnt try to atleast give a solution
2019-12-11 19:51
#119
Maka | 
France Barburo 
16 is old enough to be aware and clever on some stuff. It's sure it's hard to handle for an insecure "alpha male" of HLTV.
2019-12-10 22:04
#394
 | 
Portugal Bubulatikas 
Actually 16 years old is pretty immature taking in count that politics isn't thought in schools and philosophy is only thought when you're 15 years old. Kids with that age, including my self and all the others here, debating, didn't have enough knowledge to contest something that is told from their parents/teachers unless they question it and don't get a clever answerback. That's basically what happened to me when I was that age and that's why I didn't get manipulated. Because I questioned it and still had questions to be answered which none could answer me until I found actual climatologists whom answered everything I wasn't sure about and it made sense. It's about consistent debate and consistent facts. Not everything going around the same thing "CO2" in a subject that is immensely complex like the climate of our planet. Let me leave you with this question: When the temperature raises 3-4º Celsius from one day to another, is it the CO2 that went up on that day?! And does it has side effects on the weather of that day that you can actually tell by looking into the sky, or did someone get sick and died because of it?! Think about it
2019-12-13 14:39
#36
 | 
Brazil RAYRELiCK 
"she is a hero" yeah, like the time when the world would ends tomorrow but she said "how dare you" and the world stopped
2019-12-10 18:39
She has does a lot more than anyone here. My self included as we should all do more. My sole contribution is using my bike instead of the car when possible, video conferencing instead of flying to meetings and taking the train for holidays instead of flying driving. Has Greata made me make those choices, that is a "No" only I know people which have altered their habits because Greta reached their children which again got to the parents. Are you proud of not respecting her message?
2019-12-10 21:34
#158
 | 
United States PP_Bizon 
yes
2019-12-11 03:16
Then something is wrong with you.
2019-12-11 16:35
#255
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
her message is kinda fake, she doesnt give a solution, she just critizise the actions of the people thinking that she is right and only she is right
2019-12-11 19:29
#57
 | 
Norway RealErk 
just because i know hitler doesnt make his opinions correct
2019-12-10 20:18
Which of her statements are wrong? Come on then, surely you have a whole list only I hope you also have the science to back up your statements.
2019-12-10 21:30
#90
 | 
Norway RealErk 
Nothing wrong, just idiotic. She doesnt even understand the basics of economics and probably has never heard of Adam Smith.
2019-12-10 21:31
Answer me this. Which is most economic, to fix something before it is broken and to try and fix something after it is broken? Maybe you do not get that climate change is not just about economics, but about so much more. Right now we are looking at small Island nation becoming unlivable and the changes in out part of the world is minor in comparison, but it is gonna get a lot worse with more extreme weather, desserts being created, people force to flee where they live, likely conflicts because those people will have to find other places to live, hunger problems, species lost.. climate change is happening so fast that nature can not keep up. If there is an idiot here it is the one talking about Adam Smith.
2019-12-10 21:43
#116
 | 
Norway RealErk 
Yes ofcourse all that would be great, but as people like yourself dont understand how to do it except complain without taking action. We cant just stop using fossile fuel even though it would be good. As i see it you dont know the basics of economics either.
2019-12-10 22:02
You get it wrong, And to be blunt I get why a Norwegian is insisting on talking about economics. However a lot can be done if we make it a priority. An example. I suppose you know about Maersk, the Danish company which among other things is and has been the Worlds biggest shipping company for over two decades - more than 20% of the global shipping is handled by them. Now shipping is a dirty business with ship running on the most pollutant oil of all, stuff so thick it must be heated to be fluent and shipping companies know this. In 2018 the world shipping produced aprox. 2% of the worlds CO2, so while Maersk already having a very modern and efficient fleet their share alone in the World CO2 is sizeable. Fortunately they are working towards doing something is working to do something about that, not only because it is the right thing to do but also because in the long run it is good business (I think Adam Smith would agree). maersk.com/news/articles/2019/06/26/towa..
2019-12-10 22:24
#191
dv | 
United Kingdom dv-_- 
Yes, and people like this should be in the news, not Greta.
2019-12-11 10:56
Only the average person doesn't read or listen to such news, this is why there needs to be people like Greta to make them listen.
2019-12-11 16:31
#257
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
hahaha, not even greta knows about this dude, xDDD
2019-12-11 19:31
ADAM FUCKING SMITH So because you took BASIC economics in 10th grade of school you think you are some relative genius on the topic of economics. Let me guess, next name you will brag about knowing is Milton Friedman? Wow, very impressive. How about this: For the last 160 years, nature has been completely neglected in favor of economics even though what would have needed to be a balance between the two. So NOT making radical economic changes will completely fuck us over guaranteed and while making radical economic changes might be a massive burden on everyone and might be terrible for us for decades to come, it would still be less catastrophic than just going the "oh yeah maybe decrease CO2-output by like 0.001% by 2040"-route that many pathetic centrist corporatist politicians are for. Basically what I am saying is we need to take back from the economy what we have stolen from nature to get the balanc back that should have been aimed for all of those decades/centuries.
2019-12-10 23:42
#183
 | 
Norway RealErk 
Braindead leftist that doesnt understand hoe the world works. Not surprising tbh
2019-12-11 10:19
Wow, so thats your reply. You might as well concede. Boasting like a fucking peacock and then pussying out of actually giving an argument. Typical.
2019-12-11 19:10
#259
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
stopping with industries annd stopping CO2 means industries and factories to be closed, which means less job, which means poverty, which means more people dying because lack of food/medicine/health, which means less people in the world, which means good for nature bad for humankind xD. I mean, if you want something, try to find a good solution and not a critizise pls
2019-12-11 19:34
When did I ever claim that that would not happen?
2019-12-11 19:46
#275
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
well then, it isnt an option, thing about other thing since your hero greta hasnt given any solution to this problem
2019-12-11 19:47
You havent actually read #143, have you?
2019-12-11 20:10
#294
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
I have, but source: believe me is not nothing im keen with. Show me proofs that she is trying to fix the climate change since the only thing i know about her is that she yells at everyone because of not helping the climate change with an angry face and doing no actions about this. How do you know we arent helping the climate change? Have you ever thought why people is mad at this girl?
2019-12-11 20:15
#297
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
so she thinks that leaders dont listen to scientists? leaders have a lot to worry about and im pretty much sure that atleast some of them listen to the scientists. Atleast she says that, but cmon... A 16 yo girl who knows little about life needs to know that the world dont listen, they want to see, not hear. People wants to see someone acting rightfully, not talking and attacking the leaders of nations.
2019-12-11 20:18
#298
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
Moreover, she is part of an activist group... which doesnt give a good rep at all
2019-12-11 20:19
Dude at this point you are just pulling shit out of your ass to not have to admit that she is doing exactly what she should be doing. Those "leaders" listen to lobbyists and she IS ACTING RIGHTFULLY. She has no other options than to pull awareness to the issue and actually devote time to it. What the actual fuck do you expect her to do? She IS NOT AN ENGINEER, she IS NOT A CLIMATOLOGIST, she IS NOT AN ECONOMIST. So if you have a problem with her knowing her place and that she ISNT pretending to be a know-it-all, thats on YOU.
2019-12-11 20:25
#306
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
you are right, SHE IS NOT A CLIMATOLOGIST NOR AN ECOMONIST, SO WHAT THE HELL IS SHE DOING THERE TALKING TO IMPORTANT PEOPLE ABOUT A PROBLEM THAT IS KNOWN BY THE LEADERS, she literally wants western countries to pay everything lmao.
2019-12-11 20:33
#307
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
She wants us to pay and be poor when she is rich enough to also suppor the movement the annoying activists are doing. I believe in climate change, but i dont believe that the solution is to make my country which struggles with economy pay a lot for something like this.
2019-12-11 20:37
#308
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
This girls should be at school studying, but instead is being used by her parents as a dog to split the words they tell her, cmon dude. She says a truth that everyone already knows, she says to listen to science but there is no scientist speaking or talking to the leaders, just a 16 yo child who is not doing too much.
2019-12-11 20:41
Again, name one other person that has CONFRONTED the other leaders collectively like that EVER. Ill wait. Until you find another person I am done with you, because that is exactly the point why what she is doing is perfectly fine. And at this point its obvious that you are LOOKING for nonsense to criticize about her.
2019-12-11 20:43
#321
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
okay, you said a person that confronted leaders, that doesnt mean about this subject right? We have: Martin Luther, Gandhi, Martin L. King Jr. This three guys did what they did in a respectful way without any kind of hate or anything like that, again, she thinks the right way, acts the wrong way, you cant act like she has been acting which made people hate her not for her ideals but for her actions.
2019-12-12 02:52
Yes of course about THIS subject, because this is the first fucking thing in world history that impacts the entire world equally. And btw, Martin Luther afaik was pretty intense about it. But again, in your mind everyone of those fucked up world leaders who only cares about the lobbyists and not about the people should be treated as if they werent incredibly irresponsible. Why the fuck should I treat leaders who intentionally fuck shit up for EVERYONE as if I am talking about something unimportant? Here is the flaw in your thinking: Being nice and unconfrontative about it HAS NOT WORKED That has been tried out by climate scientists and activists for about 20 - 30 years now and its time to change the tone of the conversation because these leaders if you are NOT accusatory will just smile and laugh you off, because they can, and they can precisely BECAUSE you are nice. They will never feel pressure if we behave in a way to not hurt their egos. She hasnt acted completely perfectly (a bit too emotional at times) but her overall way of acting is exactly correct.
2019-12-12 17:39
#363
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
If i thought your way, then the black people would have never been recognized, the humann rights wouldnt have ever been made and the woman wouldnt have any right. Also the cold war would have been a real war and almost like a 3rd world war. Words make more than anything in the world, if you talk wisely you can change people as the people i named did, Martin luther was "violent" cause he was talking with catholics lmao, and they were actually FIGHTING for who had more domination in the western civilization so it was an intense verbal war since some kingdoms agreed with luther and others didnt(all because of benefits for themselves). In this case Greta has no war to deal with, no enemies to deal with, no kingdoms, so she could easily talk with patience and without pointing fingers to the leaders, going respectfully and refering them and talking wisely.
2019-12-12 18:43
#365
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
if she loses against her emotions then there is no way she will ever be heard by the leaders and she will be a funnier joke for the leaders, believe me, the best is to talk wisely and atleast bring any scientist who knows a lot about the climate change to show them the reality. They will listen to someone who has a title, not a children who has no title, thats the way they think and will think. Cause a guy with a suit is more reliable than a guy that smells like rats. Thats how the world actually works.
2019-12-12 18:46
Honestly at this point especially with your last paragraph I have to hold myself back to not call you an actual idiot. All of those humanitarian achievements have happened through peaceful means. Sure. They happened to be achievable through those means. Again, climate change activism hasnt fucking started with Thunberg, it started DECADES AGO and has been peaceful and respectful ever since. And how much has it done? Very little. We have reached the point at which we know that lobbyists simply dont care about peaceful factual conversation. So now we have to resort to more agressive factual conversation. Its the natural consequence. "They will listen to someone who has a title" BUT THEY FUCKING DONT YOU ABSOLUTE FUCKING MORON. THEY DONT LISTEN TO THE SCIENTISTS THEY DO NOT LISTEN TO SCIENTISTS So stop fucking deluding yourself that switching the tone of conversation would work because it hasnt worked in this case. And it also is no option to put any random scientist up there. Climate change activists have tried that for years as well, and it changes NOTHING. And heres a little thought your little Gandhi-Luther argument is missing. All of those things are almost strictly social changes. There are almost no lobbies that opposed apartheid, because theres not much value in doing so. However there are MASSIVE lobbies opposing green energy and anti-pollution regulation laws, because they directly impact the income of the rich and powerful. And thats why pulling a fucking Gandhi-revolution isnt gonna happen when it comes to a green revolution. Its gonna have to be much less peaceful.
2019-12-12 21:02
#375
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
if they dont listen to a scientist, they wont listen to a 16 yo girl. That is logic, if they are ignorants of what's happening in the world they wont listen even if a 16 yo girl yells at them with an "how dare you" or "you ruined my childhood" or whatever. It is a fact that the humankind has always learnt in the bad way, and yelling at the most important people of the world isnt going to change a single thing, you actually showed me a source where she says "listen to the scientists" and then you tell me that they dont listen to them, so you are telling me that yellinng at them will work better than a scientist explaining everything? If they wont try to listen to a scientist, they will not listen to Greta. I'll repeat again, Greta thinks the right way, acts the wrong way and prove me wrong if yelling at someone have ever fixed an ambiental or political or diplomatical problem, it didnt happen and it was because if they are blinded enough, they wont listen to anybody and that's called pride.
2019-12-13 05:54
#376
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
I agree with the point that this guys are stupids af, but i dont agree with the idea of thinking that Greta is a hero or the best person of the year for telling something that has been told for decades and that no one has listened. The only reward Greta got from this yelling and accusing was hate from the people that she wants to listen to her. She is taking a risky and bad decition at yelling to this people, she needs to find a way to make them be conscient about whats happening since the industrial revolution. I'll say it once again, people that have spoken wisely and peacefully made greater changes than people that yell at others, and its not only with Greta, there's a loooot more activist people who thinks that destroying a city or damagin people or going without clothes in the streets will fix a problem. Which, is a wrong way of thinking. You can win an argument like Greta has done many times probably, but winning the arguments doesnt mean winning the people, people for good or bad have their own ways of thinking, and if they are ignorants they wont change from night to morning with a speech pre-made by someone else.
2019-12-13 05:59
#377
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
honestly i dont want my world get destroyed by stupid people, but we need to think of other ways to fix this problem. We already know that yelling or pointing fingers wont fix anything whatsoever.
2019-12-13 06:01
But changing voters minds will and thats what Greta is doing. She is exposing those politicians as people who not only dont listen to scientists but also not to their voters. Also, the people that get "turned away" by Greta are people who already have been doubting the science behind climate change anyway. She has given those pathetic cunts like Crowder and Trump more of a platform to make fun of the movement but both those people and their fans ARE ALREADY not on the side of climate change activists, so I dont see how that makes a difference ultimately. She has done much less harm than she has done good.
2019-12-13 15:22
#312
 | 
Norway RealErk 
no need to argue when i already know youre braindead. its like talking to a wall
2019-12-11 21:34
Nah dude you were way too cocky for that earlier, you are scared. nt tho
2019-12-11 23:18
#337
 | 
Norway RealErk 
last thing i would ever be scared about is a leftist
2019-12-12 12:35
I didnt say you were scared of me, you are scared of the debate. Keep fleeing.
2019-12-12 17:32
She make zero difference. Ther was many activist less annoying than this kid and make zero differences. This speech is much better and make zero difference and was in 1992 youtube.com/watch?v=JGdS8ts63Ck
2019-12-10 20:38
She has managed to put World leaders on the spot, to make them listen and realize that the youth either is or soon will be voters and that they need to take action. I know not everywhere the message has made it through, like fx. in Poland where it seems you are happy to burn coal as you have your own PIS to deal with. But other places things are getting done - maybe it is to little to late but people are trying and so should you.
2019-12-10 21:29
No, she hasn't. She's managed to put Western leaders on the spot. And sure, every single one of us could be doing more to combat/slow down the effects of change (even though it's impossible to stop entirely) but the biggest difference she could make would be to preach to the Asian nations that pollute the most, and yet she doesn't do it.
2019-12-10 22:00
I think the best chance of getting China and the like to really do something, that is if their customers ie. the west demands they do so to me getting to those she can reach is a hell of a lot better than getting nowhere with those she likely can not reach. Maybe I am overoptimistic, but I have to believe the more people talk about climate change the better the chance of some doing something.
2019-12-10 22:05
Nah, I think I do broadly agree with you on that topic. Spreading awareness is never a bad idea and I don't hate Greta for what she's doing, but I do find it inexplicable that she's preaching almost exclusively to Western audiences about a problem that they are already not the biggest contributors towards. Perhaps it's easier to talk about to Westerners about cutting down on meat a few times a week or cycling instead of driving to work, than it is to address the ridiculous and harmful overpopulation in some Asian and African countries, and the over-industrialisation of the far east, but I feel like that's what necessary in order for real change to happen on a global scale. It's easy to say "well what are you doing to help?", but we don't have the voice and the reach that someone like Greta has. I'd like to see her open up some dialogue on this difficult conversations and that will put both the haters and the cynics (of which I fall into the latter category since I'm just a natural pessimist in life) to the sword.
2019-12-10 22:11
I agree and disagree. I agree that it would be good and it is also needed that those countries that are not doing anything or only doing very little needs to do a lot more, only it is something said very easily sitting where we are. However, and this is where I disagree, it is not like our part of the world is doing nearly enough to combat climate change, so people like Greta is certainly needed to keep pushing for us to do more. You can argue that overpopulation and the rise in living standards in the 3rd world means more CO2 and more, which is true, and also that those countries need to do things and that in a way it is easier/cheaper* for them to do it that it is for us. Only that is again seen from our perspective, if you live in a 3rd world country, then you may not but your parents or grand parents will have experience famines, massive infant death rates and other terrible things so the main thing for people is to get comfortable. They do not have the luxuries we have had in generations. *worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2019/02/26..
2019-12-10 22:40
#262
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
any idea to fight the climate change? since greta hasnt given any solution to it, she just blamed authorities
2019-12-11 19:38
#69
 | 
Finland ToxicDUD 
but she just speaks bs all the way
2019-12-10 20:41
So are you saying climate change is not an issue?
2019-12-10 21:25
#180
 | 
Finland ToxicDUD 
Im saying that we will not die in 12 years due to climate change No-one will
2019-12-11 09:37
And when has she said that we will? And btw. people are already dying because of climate change, just look at the extreme hot weather we have been getting in much of Europe - that directly costs lives. And then there are the more frequent flooding, the hurricanes, the forest fires, the hunger problems, the lack of drinking water... non of those are unheard of in history only they are getting more frequent and more extreme. So don't say no one will.
2019-12-11 16:29
#226
 | 
Iceland fatboislim 
Oooh bullshiit
2019-12-11 17:30
#240
 | 
Finland ToxicDUD 
2016 was in top 10 coldest years of the last 100 years so no its not getting only hotter Ammount of natural disasters havent gotten any more frequent, damage costs have because there is now more to be damaged, world hunger and lack of water isnt growing at a higher rate than it was before so yeh...
2019-12-11 17:47
You need to back those claims of yours with some actual sources. Like for example your claim about 2016 is just wrong: climate.nasa.gov/news/2841/2018-fourth-w.. And about water. You do not even look outside of Europe. aa.com.tr/en/europe/soil-to-sand-spain-s..
2019-12-11 19:32
#265
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
you basically act like greta, blame everyone that dont believe climate change but you dont give a solution. What people want is a solution, not getting blamed by all this thing, people need facts not words from a 16 yo girl who doesnt give any solution to this great problem
2019-12-11 19:40
It seems you haven't really listened to what Greta is saying. She is not blaming people, she is blaming the leaders for not putting action behind the pretty words about making changes. The leaders are the ones which need to make changes happen, they need to take in what scientists and even in many cases industry and people are saying. What Greta is doing is shining a bright light on the inaction and in many cases hypocrisy of those in power, it will hopefully make some of them take action or see voters/customers replace them. Since you doubt the results of what Greta is doing, then ask yourself "Why are there people in power doing all sorts of attack on Greta as a person". If she was wrong they would either ignore her or repute her statements, but since she isn't wrong they try to make her go away by ridicule and bullying. They use the same tactics as those that defend Trump, not disputing the wrong he has done but instead trying to devalue the accusers and the process.
2019-12-12 18:21
#402
 | 
Portugal Bubulatikas 
And there's where it starts bud, ok. First of all, climate change is natural. I'll just send you this link for you to hear from Patrick Moore, Co-founder of Greenpeace: youtube.com/watch?v=kHZKo13HV2A&t=60s It's a youtube video, not a virus or some shit like that. Second of all we, as racial animals, use nature for our development and that's how we came all the way from living in caverns to creating a society and building cities. Unfortunately, there are still countries that are underdeveloped and need development but it happens that it is impossible for them to develop with people making these protests and making these debates over nothing. We today produce enough food for over 21 billion people and yet we have countries that have none of it. How about we talk about sharing? How about we talk about helping those countries that actually don't have anything reliable today to build an economy, develop themselves and therefore, take their population out of poverty. People in America, Europe, Asia, Australia talking about climate change, but they have a house, they have food to eat every day, they have cars to transport them, they have all the resources needed. Complete hypocrisy. Now you're going to say, but Trump is a horrible person and he fights against climate change, Putin too. And let me tell you a thing, I don't give a fuck. They are fighting against something that lets the world develop, even though they are not helping any country, they are destroying this useless debate to let them grow. We are humans, animals. We are apart of the world like all other animals. None is denying climate change as leftists say. Climate change is natural and we have no power on it. The earth is too big for us to try and change anything on it, we will just fail miserably. Let the countries grow and develop, let poverty disappear once and for all and then we can talk about cleaning up the mess like toxic gases and other things in the atmosphere and on the ground (that by the way, have zero impact on climate) so we can preserve our lives for the longest.
2019-12-13 15:08
#404
 | 
Portugal Bubulatikas 
youtube.com/watch?v=1zrejG-WI3U Here's a longer version with Willie Soon, Solar Physics, and earth science.
2019-12-13 15:26
#335
 | 
Finland ToxicDUD 
first article is about 2018 not 2016 desertification I can hand it to you its happening
2019-12-12 10:17
Read the article, do not just go by the URL. Here is a quote that shows shat you missed "Globally, 2018's temperatures rank behind those of 2016, 2017 and 2015. The past five years are, collectively, the warmest years in the modern record."
2019-12-12 17:59
Shes a figure head with shit charisma who has never had a single original idea. the word hero is cheap these days it seems
2019-12-10 21:03
Again - that everyone is talking about her has helped more people think about climate change. Ergo she has made a positive difference to the World - what is your contribution? To me is seem like some of her critics are either jealous on what Greta has managed or, which is worse, they are trying to deflect and make people forget about her message by talking shit about Greta. Which type are you?
2019-12-10 21:24
#270
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
i think he's neither of those, again, she isnt trying to do anything, she doesnt give any solution, she just attacks people and tries to win arguments when the most important thing isnt to win arguments but to SHOW SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM AND NOT BE AN ANNOYING 16 YO GIRL WHO DID NOTHING FOR THE WORLD
2019-12-11 19:44
"original idea" thats because she knows that she isnt a scientist and is instead trying to pull awareness on the issue, you twat.
2019-12-10 23:43
#271
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
"how you dare" yeh, great awareness btw
2019-12-11 19:44
Umm, yeah. Dont know what your argument is. Who else has ever directly told nations leaders to their face that they are fucking up the world for decades to come? Name one other person who has done that. Even if it doesnt change them, it had to be done sooner or later.
2019-12-11 19:47
#281
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
nation leaders or the western leaders? since talking does nothing, and she just talked and did nothing to the world. Look, im not against what she thinks, but what she is doing? is wrong, totally wrong, she tries to win arguments instead of giving options, is like the politicians, they critizise but dont give any solution which leads to nothing, empty words
2019-12-11 19:50
Whats wrong with saying "Listen to the ECONOMISTS who DO GIVE SOLUTIONS" if you are indeed a 16-year-old-kid who knows that she doesnt know enough about economics to give detailed and complex revolutionary green energy plans? She is doing EXACTLY what she should. If she were going around proposing solutions she would be laughed at for daring to pretend like she is an economist. So instead she says "listen to the scientists and the economists who show how it could all be done". And now people like you criticize her for that as well. The fact is, no matter what she does, people like you will always find a way to shit on her.
2019-12-11 20:09
#292
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
show me a proof that she says that, cause she just yelled at the leaders with "how dare you" and stuff like that. Give me proofs that she has said that exact words and i'll be satisfied with this girl who thinks she's a hero.
2019-12-11 20:13
#299
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
You know... i wont say it isnt wrong, actually is great this idea. But it is something that has been said for yearssssss FOR YEARSSS, im pretty upste that because a 16 yo girl talked in the media you have to react when it was known that planting trees and that stuff could help since 1990 minimun. Atleast she is showing a solution, but does she knows that leaders have nothingh to do with this and that she wont be heard? She is talking to the wrong people
2019-12-11 20:24
What the fuck are you talking about? Are you using your brain at all? She is talking to EVERYONE.
2019-12-11 20:25
#305
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
the sources you gave me she is talking to the leaders, who actually created the IPCC. Still, she is talking to the leaders and not to the people, if she wanted to talk to the people she would be in a congress or whatever, idk what the hell she is doing but she's wasting her time by talking about something that leaders already know.
2019-12-11 20:32
#151
 | 
United States JoshDAA 
I would have never known her if the fucking media didnt explode her message like a cumplosion. I never gave a shit but i now know of her due to the media, not due to her actual actions. The media just say easy clicks and invested into it
2019-12-10 23:51
KYS
2019-12-11 03:19
She’s known because she was forced onto us by “climate change activists”, which are actually people that have absolutely fuck all to do. Everyone knew of climate change before her and absolutely no one learned a thing from her speeches. All she did was screech out obvious shit in front of millions. That’s modern activism for you. No proposals, no solutions. Just empty words about her life somehow being ruined by a mysterious “someone“ and cries for help towards that same “someone”. The only countries that gave a fuck about her were already taking steps towards stopping pollution, meanwhile China, India, Russia etc still pollute the world every single day. And they will keep doing it if 100 Greta Thunbergs cry about it. She did NOTHING to improve the world. She won't do anything to improve the world. The sole thing she’s capable of doing is crying into the microphone. Anyone who legitimately thinks that skipping school in a rich swedish environment is anything more than a few missed lessons is an idiot. The problem isn't that someone needs “awareness” of the topic. It’s that something has to be done by those who don't care. And they can't be forced to loose money by a bunch of 14 year olds. It’s either that countries that ‘care’ actually show it and sanction the polluters, or that they stfu and just go back to banning their plastic bags quietly.
2019-12-11 07:06
right, thats why there was nothing before her and now there is this thing called FFF involving millions of people. she brought the debate to the public you idiot
2019-12-11 12:46
I specifically mentioned the FFF because of how fucking useless the act is. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_strike_fo.. Look at the map and tell me which big polluter has been in any way affected by it. “Millions of people” skip school and 99% of them live in countries that can do absolutely fuck all important to help the cause.
2019-12-11 13:02
???????????????? you are so retarded i dont even know where to begin
2019-12-11 13:31
Expected from a retarded leftist that has never held nor is able to hold a proper dialogue with a person with an iq higher than his own (~50)
2019-12-11 14:09
Expected from a retarded rightist that has never held nor is able to hold a proper dialogue with a person with an iq higher than his own (~50)
2019-12-11 16:28
GL with building a communist heaven, fatso
2019-12-11 16:29
okay cretin
2019-12-11 16:30
Your nickname is what it is and I am the cretin?
2019-12-11 18:09
#178 #203 #216 Everything you say is fundamentally wrong, I mean...
2019-12-11 18:46
It’s wrong because your dumb ass says so?
2019-12-11 19:08
Lets start with ". Everyone knew of climate change before her and absolutely no one learned a thing from her speeches. " are you seriously this retarded?
2019-12-12 03:36
Says the dumbass who probably hasn't gone out out of his room for a few years now. Yes, moron, everyone knows of climate change. Anyone with access to education/books/internet, at least. Probably every country with any level of education has ecology lessons, where the main topic is global warming. And they fucking learn about it. NOT A SINGLE SOUL watched Greta Thunberg and was like “wow, I wonder what that global warming thing is”. Internet is a fucking thing and that’s where people learned of her. You had to have been solely reading some shit like russian news to not have seen anything about global warming before greta. If you genuinely think anyone did learn a thing from her, you should honestly consider lobotomy.
2019-12-12 07:10
Did Greta start a movement where millions protest for change or not? Did the amount of cliamte change relatd coverage in the news increase after Greta or not? Did politicians increasingly start talking about the issue or not? Did all the attention Greta brought to the issue increase awareness on a braoder scale or not? Did she make some ignorant people rethink their position? And lastly, was the urgency to act communicated well enough by news, politicians, scientists, etc etc before someone like Greta came along? I'll answer that one: No it fucking wasnt. You probably already underwent a lobotomy if you think Greta didn't bring positive change. But ultimately I think you are just talking out of your arrogant ass or you just have no idea how the world works.
2019-12-12 16:03
>thinks global warming is an urgent problem humanity has to solve >tells me I don't know how the world works Why don't you and other “activists” get a job instead of worrying about these kinds of things?
2019-12-12 16:42
>uses meme arrows outside of chins confirmed 12yo
2019-12-12 17:36
also I love the contradiction, first you say noone learned anything from greta, then you say GW is not an urgent problem, which is the exact opposite of what greta says. and supporting gretas actions automatically makes me an activist - again your tiny brain at work. like I said, you are retarded. just an arrogant clueless 12yo who literally has no fuzcking clue how anything works.
2019-12-14 12:26
supporting greta thunbergs actions = leftist, your small retard brain at work
2019-12-11 16:29
Those countries that "can do absolutely fuck all important" have more power that what you think. Take a look at what I wrote about Maersk in #125 to give just one example. Those countries also give a lot to lift 3rd World nations, so when they think climate into how those aid money are spend it helps pushing the agenda and there is the whole thing where being customers makes producers listen.
2019-12-11 16:24
They don't have any influence whatsoever.
2019-12-11 16:29
Who doesn't - Maersk, the consumers in the west, the governments that give billions in aid to the 3rd World or who? Why don't you look up Africa and renewable energy and learn something.
2019-12-11 16:34
Germany, Denmark, Sweden and others have no influence these days. Any investments of theirs are miserable compared to those done by China, who quite literally controls economies of a few african nation's like Ethiopia. I specialize in politology and I know a lot more about Africa than you do. Obviously I don't know many things, but something I know for sure is that Denmark and Sweden are completely irrelevant in world politics.
2019-12-11 18:03
I think "completely irrelevant" is pushing it. Yes, what China is doing makes it out for a lot only it is not like they are not slowly coming around to what especially the EU is asking. Small things matters also and if you look at how the electrification of Africa is also taking advantage of renewable energy you will see it is not all bad.
2019-12-11 19:25
#286
 | 
Argentina Joedash 
africa dude? africa suffers of civil wars, poverty, lack of medicine/health and of a lot more of things, they dont even have elecrification xD what are u talking about
2019-12-11 19:54
agree, excluding the country u list
2019-12-11 12:51
More impactful people in 2019: Trump Boris Johnson Nancy pelosi Freedom protesters Balsonaro Whoever the guy in charge of Iran is Xi jinping
2019-12-13 14:03
ok
2019-12-10 18:18
#22
 | 
Hungary mEZENCEphalon 
next thing is she'll get peace nobel award
2019-12-10 18:19
#327
 | 
Portugal Bubulatikas 
Preventing Countries from developing thanks to these climate change debates sure deserves a nobel award. Jesus Christ, climate change is natural! It always changed and it will always change. Instead of trying to change something unchangable, adapt to it.
2019-12-12 04:43
#24
Luxembourg zrbr 
HoW DaRe YoU -----------> person of the year
2019-12-10 18:21
#26
 | 
Spain Kyuuta 
who cars
2019-12-10 18:23
#27
 | 
Brazil ATURAouSURTA 
She bringed visibility for a VERY important problem, while u are sitting your ass and playing counter strike
2019-12-10 18:23
#30
 | 
Belgium HLTVnewfag 
4Head
2019-12-10 18:32
l m a o
2019-12-10 20:08
#51
 | 
Portugal fox_top_1 
surtou
2019-12-10 20:13
#64
 | 
Sweden Greta_Dumberg 
visibility? lmao the "problem" already had a lot of visibility, but most ppl dont really care about the environment, thats the real issue and a cringe kid wont turn things around
2019-12-10 20:36
#70
 | 
Finland ToxicDUD 
tHe wOrLd wIlL eNd iN 12 yEaRs iF wE dONt aDDreSs clImate ChAnGe (which according to greta herself isnt about the environment)
2019-12-10 20:42
The vast minority of climate change activists claim that. Its total bullshit that because it was uttered like once by AOC is now getting hijacked by rightists to pretend like thats the scientists or activists position when its exactly the same as saying that anyone on the right hates Jews and blacks. Its an insane strawman+generalization.
2019-12-10 23:44
#336
 | 
Finland ToxicDUD 
not saying that scientist claim that, some activists do one of whom being greta
2019-12-12 10:18
Where did she say that?
2019-12-12 17:32
cRINGE
2019-12-10 21:28
she is talking about climate change because she sucks at cs
2019-12-11 00:40
what very important problem?
2019-12-11 10:29
#28
 | 
United States Sheenaynay 
Scared for a world that is concerned about climate change lol. So you'd think our future would be better if we didn't care about climate change? The fact that this young girl can simply show concern about climate change and have man-children rage about her on counter strike forums just highlights how immature and short-sighted right wingers/climate-deniers are. A child can debate better than you, think about that for a second.
2019-12-10 18:29
+1 men
2019-12-10 19:53
+1 and brazil's president keep talking shit about her, I hate my country
2019-12-10 20:21
#72
 | 
Sweden Greta_Dumberg 
u missed the point big bro, use more than 1 braincell and u might get it. And its not a debate, its a speech, probably written be someone else
2019-12-10 20:42
#91
 | 
United States Sheenaynay 
its the message that counts. You fail to refute the base of the argument
2019-12-10 21:33
the message? lmao we hear this alarmism crap since the 90s, but apparently everything is getting worse, what means that we did nothing significant to avoid it. Greta is a puppet being used to promote a political agend, nothing more. She and many others that came before her didnt encourage ppl to change the way they act towards nature because as i said, things are getting worse, pointing out a well known problem and saying some cringe sentences wont make the world better. Extinguish this "end of the world" bullshit and face the problem by its real proportions may be a turn over. But Europe is already destroyed, most of its leaders pretends to worry about it to raise their voters, american leaders dont give a fuck, the oil industry is stronger than ever, so who cares, none of us will be here when the world trully colapse anyway,
2019-12-10 22:25
#128
 | 
United States Sheenaynay 
Politicians have always pretended to care about things to pander to voters, but it is up to the voters and everyday people to be vocal about what they want done so that leaders are held to some form of standards. Don't you agree it would be better if politicians did their job? Why can politicains speak without backing up their words and not be held accountable, but when Greta speaks she needs to shut up because its pointless? It seems hypocritical.
2019-12-10 22:29
Never said she needs to shut up. And yes, it is pointless. Period. Politicians have the power to do something. She doesnt, no matter how deluded u r to think her message changes something, it doesnt. The "environment" crew will applaude, most "everyday people" wont give a fuck cause her speach is saturated and, as always, theres nothing purposeful in what she says. In politics, most of us are binary, u pick a side and follow the ideas that compose it, like a religious war, so think for a sec and u will realise that a matter like the environment cant make ppl produce a majoritary vocal. There will be retards denying it and even more retards saying the world will end in 10 years. It should ALWAYS be discussed technically, not in a subjective ground where mommy and daddy aka people have to beg little john aka state to do something about it.
2019-12-10 23:24
#130
 | 
United States Sheenaynay 
And if you think about it, the 90's was almost 30 years ago. Climate science picked up when in like the 60's? It really hasn't been that long that climate change has been an issue, and if it is gaining ground now and nations are starting to act towards solving it, then why should we stop them from trying? There is no cost to us, and it only benefits everyone.
2019-12-10 22:31
Idk what everything u said has to do with my point against the histerical way of speaching that the kid has. Yes, thats exactly what we need, more action, more good examples.
2019-12-10 23:28
Lets Ll calm down andnsicuds clmiRe plitely
2019-12-16 00:21
#131
 | 
United States Sheenaynay 
ALSO oil is literally a FINITE RESOURCE meaning it will run out eventually. If you only care about secured jobs in this lifetime but not the MASSIVE layoffs and destruction that will happen when we run this earth dry (and the systemic failures that will happen when we have no alternative means of energy) then you're deluded and must truly see no point to life, which is quite sad imo.
2019-12-10 22:32
Yes, it is finite, but dont worry, u, ur sons, their sons etc will pass away, but that finite resource will still be there. Gladly we will develop better sources of energy, im sure we will. I only care about my life and the life of the ones close to me lmao, why would i waste my time thinking about ways of solving a massive problem when my own life isnt solved yet? If the main point of ur living days is to convince ppl of "fixing" the earth or such absurd things, then u r the one without any kind of purpose here.
2019-12-10 23:41
#149
 | 
United States Sheenaynay 
Thats quite literally the definition of "having a purpose," to do some kind of activism and fight for the betterment of everyone. Not everyone has to care about the world population, but some people do, just like not everyone has empathy for the homeless or for the poor. Its just inhumane to let it happen and not care, and if you don't mind being openly unethical and inhumane then thats fine it just makes you an immoral person (which is definitely a bad thing, but if you don't care then dont let anyone stop you from being you).
2019-12-10 23:48
U r actually completelly wrong. First, the definition of "having a purpose" is "to have an intended or desired result; end; aim; goal; determination; resoluteness", it CAN be "activism and fight for the betterment of everyone", but here u messed things around, thats pretty much what u did in every single reply u gave me. Activism and fight for the betterment of everyone arent the same thing neither move together. Anyway, it DOESNT have to be it, one more time, it DOESNT HAVE TO BE IT. Me, you, people in general doesnt have to pursue a purpose in life related to "some kind of activism and fight for the betterment of everyone". Second, I never said we need to ignore and do nothing about the bigger problems of our society as u intended, pretty much the opposite, we need to DO more, be LESS histerical/alarmist/apocalyptic in our discourses and DO more, be more active and less talkative. Third, im not unethical neither inhumane for focusing more on my own life than on the lives of everyone else lmfao, what kind of dumb and deturped way of thinking is that, are u what? 15 years old? Wont even extend myself on that one rofl. Have a good night, brother
2019-12-11 00:36
#73
 | 
Finland ToxicDUD 
well its not even about the environment according to greta, its just socialism by the backdoor
2019-12-10 20:42
#92
 | 
United States Sheenaynay 
source?
2019-12-10 21:33
#182
 | 
Finland ToxicDUD 
dailywire.com/news/greta-snaps-change-ev.. Its a quote so you can probably find the video with a little searching that I'm too lazy to do
2019-12-11 09:38
dailywire xdddd
2019-12-12 17:43
You are going to gulag immediately
2019-12-10 21:34
Now she said that her books and stuff not only about climat changes but also about human rights she basically say things that ppl want to hear from her
2019-12-10 21:05
#95
 | 
United States Sheenaynay 
Nobody *wants* to hear about human rights violations or the end of the Earth, its some sad shit dude. It IS though something that *needs* to be heard in order to move forward.
2019-12-10 21:34
Climate changes is bad , but she doesnt helping at all
2019-12-10 21:06
only talks about it and skips school. LMAO so good! Jadav Molai Payeng should be the one promoted to glory, 16 yo and actually doing something useful. Or Boyan Slat, young inventor who has contributed a lot more than a crying little girl
2019-12-11 10:35
#31
 | 
Belgium HLTVnewfag 
Who
2019-12-10 18:33
who cars(not me)
2019-12-10 18:37
#34
 | 
Norway Bigg1 
what has she said that is wrong?
2019-12-10 18:38
#227
 | 
Iceland fatboislim 
That she cant go to school because of climate change
2019-12-11 17:33
#234
 | 
Norway Bigg1 
when did she say that?
2019-12-11 17:40
#235
 | 
Iceland fatboislim 
Cant remember when it was, why does it matter?
2019-12-11 17:41
#302
 | 
China SwooksarV2 
At the UN thing The one that mad her "famous" the "how dare you "
2019-12-11 20:27
#318
 | 
Norway Bigg1 
legit just looked up that speach and never de she say that "she cant go to school"
2019-12-12 00:52
#320
 | 
China SwooksarV2 
I think she phrased it like "I should be at school, playing with other kids and not here" or something along the lines of that. She never specifically said that she can't go to school, I think she's means to say, "I'm skipping school so I can raise awareness cause you guys are screwing the climate" Idk, maybe I remembered wrong
2019-12-12 01:03
How dare you
2019-12-10 18:38
#37
KRIMZ | 
Sweden bakish 
Oh yeah, for sure, her parents was kind of known, semi-known at least And this is probably their way of getting some attention again, though through their daughter
2019-12-10 18:40
#43
 | 
United States Sheenaynay 
Its also possible that they were just good role models, and their daughter was inspired to do her own acts of activism. The parents having a platform may have given her an avenue to pursue her own desires, a means which most children don't have, which is how and why she has now captivated so many people around the world.
2019-12-10 20:06
#38
 | 
Yugoslavia seeeed 
Nobody cares. She will be forgotten in a few years when her social media credits run out. And then there will be another new kid. This how it goes all the time. When was the last time you have heard about Malala? People like you who outrage over this are no great minds. You are just giving fuel to the neo liberal spectacle. You are giving them a reason to push it. A reason to talk about it. And after a while you will just forget about it just like you forgot about Malala. And the circle will repeat itself.
2019-12-10 18:42
#44
 | 
United States Sheenaynay 
The implication of this is that nothing good comes from being made aware of issues going on in the world, which is true on a small scale (big changes are hard to make quickly), but over time and as they accumulate, mindsets change and overall structural changes do happen.
2019-12-10 20:07
#58
 | 
Yugoslavia seeeed 
I mean talking about issues is an important thing i never denied that. All i said is that theese people who outrage over how bad and cringe and agenda thingy it is will forget about this in a few months and outrage over some other dumb thing. And all they will achieve is make themselves seem idiotic
2019-12-10 20:20
#99
 | 
United States Sheenaynay 
I definitely agree with that, just the way you phrased your argument could easily be applied the other direction (eg. activism doesnt matter because people eventually forget and live the same lives they have always lived), so I misunderstood how you were applying the logic. My bad
2019-12-10 21:37
#41
 | 
Germany blegh 
k boomer
2019-12-10 19:54
ok so much guys making money of her its funny...and she feels to be something important
2019-12-10 20:05
shes not trying to change the world by talkin, shes trying to encourage us to do something about it. but our ego is so big we rather burn in a desert than helping this planet :d
2019-12-10 20:08
#50
 | 
Czech Republic Xedys 
True
2019-12-10 20:12
she has a punchable face
2019-12-10 20:14
says the fat virgin
2019-12-12 17:44
im a smart, handsome guy and she is a dumb, ugly puppet.
2019-12-12 17:45
you must be insanely smart if your only argument against a 16 year old climate activist is that shes ugly. i bet youre as handsome as you are smart xd
2019-12-12 17:48
climate activists have low iq and puppets of climate activists even lower. nice strategy to put an ugly butterface on screen to promote their shit. easier to feel pity.
2019-12-12 17:52
alright thanks for proving my point
2019-12-12 17:53
normal people cant do anything about it, its up to the leaders of countries to change.
2019-12-10 20:42
if every person who changed something, said normal people cant do anything about it, ofc u cant do anything about it. if we didn't live in this digital brainwashed idiotic world of false information and fake entertainment, we would have been part of a revolution already 10 years ago.
2019-12-11 20:00
she"s a child , very young , she dont understand that well its easy to talk about smthg bad but it is much harder to do anything about it
2019-12-10 20:51
#101
 | 
United States Sheenaynay 
The lesson from this should be that everyday people are outraged at the world powers' failure to take action. Even a child can grasp the severity of climate change, and world leaders do not do anything significant about it (specifically America), so everyday people should get mad about their inaction in order to prompt leaders to be the ones that *do their job* and take action.
2019-12-10 21:40
ok
2019-12-10 20:10
#49
 | 
Czech Republic Xedys 
ok
2019-12-10 20:12
climate activists are so pathetic. always sending out a dumb, ugly child to talk shit.
2019-12-10 20:13
i mean yes climate changes are true , but u they are not helping
2019-12-10 20:49
#107
 | 
Norway Bigg1 
what has she said that is wrong tho?
2019-12-10 21:47
#189
shox | 
Korea Jew2K 
Not being wrong doesn't make it great
2019-12-11 10:36
It's Pavlik Morozov of our times.
2019-12-10 20:14
She is just the poster-girl for the new fascism. The powers behind her are just using her like some used Hitler to push an agenda. They just dress the old up in new clothes suitable for the sociologically created fascism of today.
2019-12-10 20:14
0/8 bait
2019-12-10 21:36
#102
 | 
United States Sheenaynay 
Slippery slope is a myth, and solving climate change would benefit the world not just a specific group of people. 0/8 b8
2019-12-10 21:41
I don't think you know the slightest about the whole climate issue. Probably you're just smoking too much pot.
2019-12-11 18:05
TIME magazine is a joke anyways. If anyone takes that trash publication seriously, they need to rethink their life
2019-12-10 20:15
#59
 | 
Germany Juliancjg 
ok
2019-12-10 20:20
idk but what other options are there?
2019-12-10 20:21
#228
 | 
Iceland fatboislim 
Me
2019-12-11 17:35
just a walking simbol. we use simbols for alot of stuff. has its role. but still. pirralha.
2019-12-10 20:24
she is probably being passed around among nasty older men aswell
2019-12-10 20:25
nice head cinema is open and leads directly into porn LUL monkaS
2019-12-10 20:40
I have nothing against her. But to criticism someone is very very easy. To have a solution it is harder. She really offers ZERO solution and on some point, you have to say "Well Then SHUT THE FUCK UP"
2019-12-10 20:39
Well, the "solution" (or at least one of the obvious and easiest to put into pratice) is pretty well-known, it just goes against many monetary interests and empires, specially the oil industry. Thats why it doesnt really matter if a child being string-controled like a puppet by some secondary interests will accomplish anything imo.
2019-12-10 21:00
the solution are E-cars? This is so fucking bullshit. To make an e-car is far more toxic than a normal car does in their whole lifetime. The thing that can maybe work are cars with hydrogen, when you make the process for makinng hydrogen with strong solar energie. 5G btw cost energy in a country like germany so many as a really big town. So literally you have to stop everything even Internet and computer. I mean you can do it. it is a solution but then? 7 billion people that want food and be rich yeah ww3 incoming.
2019-12-11 06:00
No, i wasnt refering to e-cars. I was refering to solar panels being able to power up the entire earth, there are studies that show how much of an area would have to be covered with it, and its frankly not THAT big. You dont need to stop electronics, you just need to power them in a way more efficient and environment-friendly way. Btw, about the 7 billion people, it is estimated that it will grow up to 9 billion in less than 7 decades, so controlling earth's population will need to happen somehow :x
2019-12-11 14:55
atm a solar cell needs 15 -20 years to get more energy at its cost to make it. Also with Max 40% efficacy in a lab and normal 20% they suck as well. I mean in the end if they get 25 years old and you can refresh them they are good enough atm. Google built a big solar panel system for its servers years ago. But you have also to consider you need a lot of space. No solution will help immediately and no solution has zero cost and prices (price in a way of money and sacrifices, cost in a way that every solution is made with shitting on climate)
2019-12-11 16:21
I dont remember exactly, but it would be something like covering an entire area about the size of 1.2% of the Sahara Desert to power up the entire planet. Tbh, that doesnt seem undoable. And yes, every solution we can come up with has its downsides, but the upside is way better than its downsides are bad, imo
2019-12-11 16:38
#328
 | 
Portugal Bubulatikas 
Sorry bud, but that's not realistic. Life is not a game. How are you ever going to power the entire world with energy coming from the same place? XD It's 5.500.000 Square kilometers which 71% is water and you need to transport that energy. What are you going to do? Make electric ships to transport giganormous batteries to power every city? Like, wtf are you thinking? Cables all around our atmosphere?! By the way, Solar panels and Wind turbines have a lifespan. After that, they are scaped and humans still don't know how to efficiently recycle material... Instead of building 15235889473894636 solar plants to power the whole world for 20-30 years, make 1000 nuclear plants to power the world for god knows how long... surely above 60 years
2019-12-12 05:28
#142
ZywOo | 
United States 7RU7H 
0 solution ? bro we all know the solution to reduce our impact on the ecosystem.. we are just not willing to do it... its about EVERYONE not only corporate/states... we are all responsible of what is happening.. but we are just a sheep so we wont do shit... its about being willing to make sacrifices.. are we willing to sacrifice our way of life for the sake of the planet !? obviously not so whatever that needs to happen will happen at some point i believe the climate constraint on the world economy will be so huge that the elite will be forced to make drastic decisions about the way of life itself... so yeah its true she is just a delusional kid but i dont think she deserves to be bashed the way she is... she is trying to fight for a right cause... so let her do her thing idk for the people bashing her be for me, her activities dont affect me in any way of my life, so i dont care what she does, its her fight...
2019-12-10 23:41
the solution can't work. Not only because of sacrfices. Someone would break the rules to get and advantage. Also too many people on this planet. I can also say a solution is : god come to earth and rescue us. That has the same value.
2019-12-11 06:03
#329
 | 
Portugal Bubulatikas 
There is no such thing as "too many people on the earth", that's some stupid argument to use. We could easily fit every 7 billion people in Australia with an organized and well thought huge town. By the way, if you're going to say we will soon have problems feeding all those people, we currently produce enough food to feed 21 billion people, and still, we have people dying in hunger in Asia and Africa. Ya'll saying there are too many people on the planet, all you care about is yourself.
2019-12-12 05:34
+1 very true i agree man
2019-12-10 20:40
#74
 | 
Bolivia KEKW 
WhY arE u aTTACkiNg a CHiLD????
2019-12-10 20:43
+999
2019-12-10 23:28
#330
 | 
Portugal Bubulatikas 
Because she was manipulated by leftists. They are simply using a child to make their beliefs come through more good people that see a child has an innocent and untargetable object. We criticize and question everything, and a child in politics and going to be treated like all the other adults in politics.
2019-12-12 05:39
Well, the thematic is actually important, and despite her at least cringy, over-dramatic, obviously orquestrated by a second party way of rising awareness to it, she deserves some credit. On the other hand, the title is obviously pathetic aswell.
2019-12-10 20:55
#230
 | 
Iceland fatboislim 
Credit? Like what kind of credit?
2019-12-11 17:36
#79
 | 
Croatia mds818 
probably... lmfao
2019-12-10 21:01
Now she said that her books and stuff not only about climat changes but also about human rights she basically say things that ppl want to hear from her
2019-12-10 21:03
She has actually done more damage to the climate change cause than good. No one likes being condescended to especially by a spoiled little brat plus it's clear that she did it for money well her parents did anyway but yeah if anything it's turned more people against the cause but I loved all the memes that came of it, of here fetal alcohol face
2019-12-10 21:39
u mad
2019-12-10 21:46
nah I enjoy people getting scammed out of their money I 100% support what she did I think if people are stupid enough to get conned then they should be conned and if you don't do it someone else will. Same with Anita Sarkeesian she's a genius and managed to get hundreds of thousands from gullible people and all she had to do was produce like 4 15 minute videos of her making basic sjw criticisms of video games. Greta admitted herself that her strike solved nothing and yeah that is true mainly because she didn't target India and China two of the biggest polluters but what she did achieve was making more people hate her and the climate scare movement they'' move the bar again though and start saying that it isn't 2011 or 2020 that we have to solve climate change by it's 2030 and then when that comes round they'll say 2041 or something and life will continue as normal.
2019-12-10 21:55
omg u mad
2019-12-10 21:56
2019-12-10 22:03
0/8
2019-12-10 22:04
#103
 | 
Sweden DEFENSE! 
Bro she is a corporate puppet. Without her celebrity parents she would literally have gotten 0 publicity. I dont care that "the message is important". Hundreds of people have tried getting the message through before her but she gets all the credit.
2019-12-10 21:42
Of course that's what you are upset about... Of course.
2019-12-10 23:47
#171
 | 
Sweden DEFENSE! 
Please continue. That wasnt an argument from your side so cant really respond to it.
2019-12-11 06:38
#231
 | 
Iceland fatboislim 
Well said
2019-12-11 17:37
who automoblies?
2019-12-10 22:06
#129
 | 
Russia hltvliker333 
Haven't even read the post and I already r8 0/8 m8.
2019-12-10 22:30
#138
XeqtR | 
Hong Kong void0 
Who?
2019-12-10 23:33
#157
 | 
Ireland whocarsman 
who cars
2019-12-11 00:46
LMFAO This kid is just pathetic
2019-12-11 03:36
#170
 | 
United States b1g_poppa 
lmao I have an eames chair in my room
2019-12-11 06:29
rofl
2019-12-11 06:45
LMAO
2019-12-11 07:09
#192
 | 
Sweden Akoulad 
well in years when she has achieved absolutely nothing, left with no degree or graduation, she can blame her parents for stealing her childhood.
2019-12-11 10:59
people care about these prices??
2019-12-11 03:31
#175
 | 
United States America! 
I think astral is vac soon?!
2019-12-11 06:59
#177
ZywOo | 
Asia myke1 
what does Swedes think of Greta,any comment?
2019-12-11 07:04
who cars, they think the world is a fluffy pink cloud
2019-12-11 10:20
#185
 | 
Korea XigNw0w 
Ignore her
2019-12-11 10:21
Autistic kid who was brainwashed, who cares?
2019-12-11 10:28
DID U JUST RAPE ME?????
2019-12-11 10:46
#193
JaCkz | 
France Bubuche 
What you don't understand is that kid of this age are absolutely affraid of their futuren They know that if nothing change FAST they will all have horrible lifes So even if they dont know how the world goes on, they just want a change, dosn't matter the costs. You'll probably change your mind when your kids will tell you that what they want for christmas is to live until 50 years old
2019-12-11 11:09
I have absolute no idea how "kids of this age" are in France, but the vast majority of kids nowadays dont give a flying fuck about much, they dont even have the ability to think ahead into the future and foresee the result of their actions. They care about likes and friends in the social media tho, thats about it.
2019-12-11 15:01
Your scared of the word because a kid is trying to SAVE IT! ok boomer
2019-12-11 11:12
#293
 | 
Finland Smoonah 
leftist scum praying for a child with aspergers to save the world LULW
2019-12-11 20:14
Im not saying she's going to save the world, but atleast she's trying to do something. And so what if she has aspergers. Not her fucking fault she has it. Grow up and be more mature.
2019-12-11 23:03
#316
 | 
Finland Smoonah 
Scientists are doing something, not some 16 year old being used by her parents as a common tool.
2019-12-11 23:55
Shes putting the word/facts INTO PEOPLE LIKE DONALD TRUMP. As I said atleast shes doing something unlike you thats just sitting down on your chair complaining about someone trying to save the world
2019-12-11 23:56
#197
 | 
Romania carm34 
+1
2019-12-11 11:14
#198
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
IPCC warned ous some years ago that excision rebellion (lefties activisme group) is taking there report out of context, to do fear propaganda through doomsday-preacher. And we Norwegians and Swedish people know that Greta’s family are connected to these small radical groups. Greta even tried to sue my country Norway for looking for oil, but the truth is, Oil is the future even if we dont use it for energy or transport. She lost the court against Norway because they know this is fear propaganda in order to make people aware of there footprint, what is okey, but bad when they try to stop industries from doing there work. Norwegian oil fund have a rule that you cannot invest in some anti-green stuff. Like, coal industry. And trust me, the oil industry invest in very much around the world. We currently only 4% of the global stockmarket. And also, the oil money have invested in massive pro-green projects and comapines in Brazil. Where we have been able to save the planet for 74 times more co2 than we have release since 1960 til today. So you can say that Norwegian oil money make the world green. That’s why she lost the case against Norwegian.
2019-12-11 11:30
Another product of twofaced world, what did u expect xD
2019-12-11 12:56
#207
 | 
Switzerland hosken 
I mean, she has been everywhere
2019-12-11 14:11
If she was really not a puppet it would be advocating for nuclear power plants, which would fix our energy needs instantly. But this isn't about the environment, it, Gretta, has been put forward by her rich EU parents and the EU itself to exercise control of member-states, thát's the plan here.
2019-12-11 14:15
+1 nuclear power = unlimited clean energy (basically) for entire world
2019-12-11 14:17
i wouldnt call it clean energy but it is one of the better options for energy
2019-12-11 17:46
+1 nuclear power is the solution to all our fossil energy problems we should just build a bunch of those everywhere and climate crisis is over. Hltv got it figured out. Love me some fat fuckheads on internet forum complaining Greta thunberg doesn't understand how the world works when they are in no position to judge that really.
2019-12-11 17:42
Riiight. Tell me why we need to waste 100s of billions of dollars vs building nuclear power plants. Newsflash; everything the EU has been trying to accomplish control-wise this decade has been put forward into their 'green deal' today, control of building, taxes, immigration, environment, infrastructure, landscaping, businesses-C02 rules. Total control of member states. You're the fat fuckhead here lol, falling for some child puppet emotionally while missing the bigger picture; that you're being taken for a fool signing away all your rights in the name of the environment, while the sollution is quite simple; Nuclear energy. What does Nuclear Energy not do? Right, it doesn't give the EU control over it's member states and literally every part of their political systems/economy, idiot.
2019-12-12 04:30
You make pointless assumptions homie, all I said is you're a fat fuckhead for pretending like shit is that easy.
2019-12-12 07:05
Right no argument from you yet again. Pointless, go back to school.
2019-12-12 15:31
Do you need me to list all the problems with nuclear energy to accept that some retard on a shit internet forum saying 'omg bro they could instantly solve all these problems with no downsides' is simply a retard?
2019-12-12 17:34
We need to stop this gloryfication (not to say worshipping) of single persons like Greta Thunberg - who probably never read a primary source about global warming in her entire life - and instead ACTUALLY start talking about the facts. The question is: What are the facts? When do we actually claim to know something? Imo the truth is: If you never carefully read and sudied scientific publications (primary sources, not secondary ones ) on global warming, on the effects of CO2 as a "greenhouse gas", then you don't know shit about climate. Then you claim to know something, which you read somewhere but never truly understood nor veryfied yourself. What happens in this debate right now is that two groups of people (the ones who claim that C02 is the main factor of global warming and the ones who claim that it is not) throw labels at each other to defame the opponent (the first group calls the others things like "alt-right", "conspiricy idiot", "aluhats" and similar thing whereas the other group pulls terms like "brainwashed leftists", "sheeple" and similar). If you want to come to a satisfying conclusion, start reading well known papers pro and contra the main claim. Very often cited is the paper from John Cook et al (by nearly all big newspapers). The ones who argue against C02 as the main factor of global warming often cite the work of Tscheuschner and Gehrlich. I will give links: John cook et al researchgate.net/publication/256538724_Q.. Tscheschner&Gehrlich (Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics) arxiv.org/pdf/0707.1161.pdf Edit: Already posted this comment in another thread but I'll do it again here since I think this is a very important subject
2019-12-11 17:41
You just basically nullified democracy bro, good job
2019-12-11 17:43
What do you mean by that?
2019-12-11 18:49
You basically said stfu unless you've studied the exact science behind whatever subject. Which doesn't really mesh well with democracy. Or any form of opinion people have on anything.
2019-12-11 19:36
That is definitely not what I wrote. The essence of my post is that people should think much more about what they actually know and what they just claim to know, before they defame others for a different point of view than their own. As you can see in this thread, this is a very emotional subject and (besides all the memes) people are mostly just stating how stupid the ones are who either believe Greta Thunberg or those who don't. This will need nowhere. Everyone claims to know the facts/know the truth, but noone can really say what that means exactly. I don't see how this would't be able with democracy. Of course you can claim to know the truth about global warming because you read a half a page long article in the NYT, or because you watched some youtube videos of some sceptic person.
2019-12-11 19:43
" What are the facts? When do we actually claim to know something? Imo the truth is: If you never carefully read and sudied scientific publications (primary sources, not secondary ones ) on global warming, on the effects of CO2 as a "greenhouse gas", then you don't know shit about climate. Then you claim to know something, which you read somewhere but never truly understood nor veryfied yourself." ?? is it unreasonable of me to read from this basically "if u dont know the exact science behind things ur opinion means nothing"?
2019-12-11 20:50
Wow I didn't believe there were _true_ retards on hltv, not just trolls.
2019-12-12 15:33
No argument to be found here homie, so I guess you're just gonna complain about stupid crap and then so it yourself just even worse?
2019-12-12 17:36
No argument to be found here homie, so I guess you're just gonna complain about stupid crap and then do it yourself just even worse?
2019-12-12 17:37
I gave my reasoning you haven't, resorted instead to namecalling. Only typical for a lefty btw, no arguments just namecalling, the usual from 10 IQ humans.
2019-12-12 23:30
You didn't say Jack shit on this topic
2019-12-13 06:25
#368
 | 
Iran CEO_of_mens 
You are the living example of why we should not implement democracy, or at least give everyone the right to vote
2019-12-12 18:52
made my point for me, thx
2019-12-12 21:22
Thanks for posting. I see one side trying to convince by breaking the important things down to the science, and one side saying that alot of people who write stuff are of one opinion. Interesting.
2019-12-11 19:50
#369
 | 
Iran CEO_of_mens 
quality post +1
2019-12-12 18:53
#238
 | 
France Fran6k1D 
If you care what the Time says about s1, you have a problem
2019-12-11 17:43
Dude relax. The TIME award means nothing. It is litteraly a magazine and you think it matters?
2019-12-11 19:29
#261
 | 
Germany uRaguuu 
she is just a little girl but had more impact on this world than trump had in his last 3 years
2019-12-11 19:37
0/8
2019-12-11 20:46
Triggered manlet 😂😂
2019-12-11 19:49
Kim press the button.
2019-12-11 19:51
cry is free You were wanking to some pornstars when you were 16
2019-12-11 19:52
#304
 | 
China SwooksarV2 
Hey, atleast it's not the terrorists Hongkong protestors
2019-12-11 20:28
I don't really care about her, but it's hilarious how shook she makes conservatives. Yeah dude keep attacking a teenage girl, you're doing a great job of protecting the oil monopolies.
2019-12-11 23:40
If you believe a single word from ((((TIME)))) magazine your deserve disability benefits
2019-12-12 00:55
#347
 | 
Russia cuba_libre10 
+11111
2019-12-12 16:47
#323
 | 
Brazil Hbarbeito 
Greta is lacreira
2019-12-12 03:42
joke
2019-12-12 03:44
Too bad Trump will win again and so will right wingers all over the world and we will keep riding on turtles full of plastics on their stomachs
2019-12-12 03:46
#346
 | 
Russia cuba_libre10 
BR talking when they have bolsonaro? XD
2019-12-12 16:47
#367
 | 
Iran CEO_of_mens 
yep, that's not SEA and China throwing millions of tons of garbage into the ocean. Orange man bad We are going nowhere with clowns like you
2019-12-12 18:49
#333
 | 
Finland BMW_xseveN 
Who and what is Greta? Cs player?
2019-12-12 07:11
Gotta give it to her parents. Great pr for their businesses. Abusing autistic kid while the world applauds, masterpiece
2019-12-12 16:45
#344
 | 
Russia cuba_libre10 
easy money. They will never have to worry about working again. Genius parents I would say
2019-12-12 16:46
#366
 | 
Iran CEO_of_mens 
+1
2019-12-12 18:48
#364
 | 
United States Grabboid 
wealthy little twat takes a sailing vacation and her uber wealthy connected parents get her to yell at UN. you stole muh childhood.... what a clown world
2019-12-12 18:44
only dumb ppl care about the person of the year thing
2019-12-12 21:05
I would say autistic kid used by leftists shitheads
2019-12-13 06:49
#381
 | 
Sweden meistr0 
Whats up with the THUMberg bs? Can ppl not spell her name or what? Or are people trying to be "funny"? I dont get it tbh.
2019-12-13 06:58
She is a puppet who goes around saying the "opressors" of the world are stealing her youth... when actually her youth has already been stolen by the ones who use her as a puppet. I don't deny the issues of our world, I just do not applaud the usage of a child like this.
2019-12-13 14:00
usage of ugly retarded evil kid...
2019-12-13 14:28
#389
 | 
Australia MercAm 
I 100% agree with her She is stupid is many ways, and like you said highlights how this world is fucked if a 15 year old is "inFluEnCinG" this world
2019-12-13 14:12
this title is not for the best human being but for person that did most things and muddle during the year for example both hitler and stalin got it :)
2019-12-13 14:31
Ok boomer
2019-12-13 14:41
Humanity is fucked anyway, too egotistical, and the more power and wealth you have the more you want. If every human a few generations ago decided to make the world the best possible place for the next generation, we'd be living in paradise by now.
2019-12-13 14:43
She's just a lefty bitch lmao
2019-12-13 14:52
The best behaviour to have is: not to care.
2019-12-13 14:54
#401
 | 
India Blizzard_01 
Bugha should have won person of the year.
2019-12-13 15:01
#408
 | 
Sweden meistr0 
Why are still talking about her? Why do people type "Thum"? Trash joke, like really trash.
2019-12-14 12:34
#409
 | 
Korea XigNw0w 
She is just a tool.
2019-12-14 12:51
#412
 | 
United States sorcrcrc 
she is annoying but harmless
2019-12-16 00:23
Tricked
3.74
GamerLegion
1.23
Hard Legion
1.19
EXTREMUM
4.35
Heroic
1.89
MAD Lions
1.82
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.