Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Greta and Federer
 | 
Sweden wtf_men 
Our fav grill Greta criticised Roger Federers partnership with Swiss bank Credit Suisse, since they are investing in fossil fuels. Federer now says he will look over his sponsorships. She could have picked literally any person on the planet and said "hey this thing you do is not eco friendly, stop it". Like maaaaan this has gone to far, like everyone can't travel across the Atlantic in a million dollar yacht like Greta. She needs to catch f****** break. You can't adapt every aspect of life to be eco friendly. theguardian.com/sport/2020/jan/12/roger-..
2020-01-12 09:20
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
#3
 | 
Poland rude_wredne 
she just says and does what other people tell her m8
2020-01-12 09:25
#6
 | 
Sweden wtf_men 
I know she is a puppet. I'm just questioning the logic behind it. Like it makes no sense to me. She could have said as well "Hey Roger, when you travel to Australia to participate in the grand slam you can't fly as it will leave an impact on our climate" <3 leftists <3
2020-01-12 09:28
#10
 | 
Poland rude_wredne 
whatever she says is a joke or doesnt make sense. HONESTLY i thought she was some joke or meme or something but its all real lmao mens))
2020-01-12 09:32
#11
 | 
Sweden wtf_men 
what do you mean? you didnt know the deal about greta before?
2020-01-12 09:33
#13
 | 
Poland rude_wredne 
i only knew by accident and thought its some sort of big media joke. Person of the year is a 17 year old kid because she preaches about climate change? joke of the year
2020-01-12 09:38
#15
 | 
Sweden wtf_men 
People praise her for being this random kid that comes out of nowhere to represent youth. However both of her parents are celebrities that brought her to the position where she is right now. Its just pure marketing and leftist propaganda
2020-01-12 09:40
#23
 | 
Poland rude_wredne 
of course men)) of course her parents/friends of her parents have connections)) and of course she comes from rich family)) i cant even make this up, this shit writes itself
2020-01-12 10:03
#25
 | 
Sweden wtf_men 
Still most people/media see her as Jesus with a vagina
2020-01-12 10:06
Joke is on you for keep caring about her. 90% of threads about her are from people that shittalk her, which says enough I guess.
2020-01-12 12:56
#71
 | 
Sweden wtf_men 
Wtf are you on about? How do I "care" about her? I literally say fuck greta and that this whole greta thing has gone too far
2020-01-12 13:51
90% of threads about her are from people that shittalk her, which says enough I guess.
2020-01-12 13:54
Esp since they change their minds six times in the last 120yrs. The 1970's Global Cooling Compilation – looks much like today During the 1970s the media promoted global cooling alarmism with dire threats of a new ice age. Extreme weather events were hyped as signs of the coming apocalypse and man-made pollution was blamed as the cause. Environmental extremists called for everything from outlawing the internal combustion engine to communist style population controls. This media hype was found in newspapers, magazines, books and on television; wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/01/global-co..
2020-01-12 09:27
#12
 | 
Sweden wtf_men 
The situation is different now than it was in 70s tho. Like the global temperature average is 0.7 degrees higher than it was during 60s-90s. I'm not questioning the truth behind global warming, I'm just saying the the approach of these leftists are distasteful. ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenho..
2020-01-12 09:36
Yes they change to whatever has happened most recently. Since 1900 they switched back and forth six times. 20yrs ago in An Inconvenient Truth they tell us next 100percent increase in man made carbons=death for everything. It is 20yrs and 100percent increase later and instead of death to everything-the globe may or may not be less than a degree warmer.
2020-01-12 09:42
#18
 | 
Sweden wtf_men 
Obviously it won't be the death to everything, but it is a serious threat. The biggest difference now to how it was before is that countries like China/India/Brazil and the African countries are having a huge impact on how the world as a whole develops. These countries are just focusing on growing rapidly, which they fuel with none sustainable resources (like coal, look at China). Earlier in history these countries were so underdeveloped that their global impact was negligible. That's the greatest reason to why we have seen such an increase in fossil fuel emissions, and is why changes are happening as rapidly as they are at the moment. The people in the west have basically lived as they have done before. But EU and NA combined is only a small portion of the global population. That is also why we see such rapid changes in sea levels etc, that won't mean the death of everything, but will affect animal life and stuff like that
2020-01-12 09:57
Yes and in 1979 we were all going to freeze to death and before that boil to death back and forth six times. Some others-Population Bomb-we were all going to starve to death by 2000. Peak oil-oil was first supposed to run out by 1990, then by 2000 no more guesses since. Ozone hole caused by hairspray and will burn us all-instead it is now virtually gone and didn't effect anyone adversly and was not caused by hairspray. They have been mostly wrong for the last 120yrs regardless. about 50percent of what they call fact now will be disproven in the next 50yrs.
2020-01-12 10:04
#26
 | 
Sweden wtf_men 
Not sure what your point is. The carbon emissions have a proven impact on the ozon layer. It's basically high school chemistry. The ozon layer is what protects us from the suns radiation. Decrease in ozon ---> warmer earth. Obviously people have been wrong about stuff in the past, that's the nature of science.
2020-01-12 10:11
it is not proven. It is assumed. Like it was assumed 20yrs ago that a 100percent increase in man made carbons. would raise the temps enough to cause mass extinction but didn't. Man's lifespans have doubled in just over three generations. Besides being incredible that would be completely and totally impossible if the planet was anything but a near perfect environment for mankind.
2020-01-12 10:34
That may be a media created myth but pre 1979 the coming ice age was a scientifically stated fact. they wanted to put black balloons around the poles to keep the heat in! youtube.com/watch?v=1kGB5MMIAVA
2020-01-12 09:58
all the links you provided including this video is from tabloid media
2020-01-12 10:05
The links cite their sources within their hysteria. Not exactly tabloids like the daily mail either. In the 1970's, it was a given scientific fact that Ice Age was coming.
2020-01-12 10:12
of course they cite the sources, they just misinterpret them just like the video I showed you
2020-01-12 10:13
It was considered scientific fact. of course there are texts/books by noted authors in there too. “Dr. Reid Bryson, a U. of Wisconsin climatologist, fears that climatic changes now in progress will eventually affect the whole human population — ‘like a billion people dying,’ he says.” over and over and over again-no different than now except freezing instead of boiling. CIA 1974 National Security Threat: Global Cooling/Excess Arctic Ice Causing Extreme Weather climatedepot.com/2013/02/26/cia-1974-nat..
2020-01-12 10:23
ok so your source here is one scientist saying climate change will affect the whole human population and CIA. you're not getting any closer to establishing this scientifict fact you claimed existed
2020-01-12 10:49
Almost every major climate organization endorsed the 1970s ice age scare, including NCAR, CRU, NAS, NASA and are quoted in the material.
2020-01-12 10:52
your material is tabloid press.
2020-01-12 10:52
NOAA is tabloid press- stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2013/0.. NCAR is tabloid press- stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2013/0.. NASA is tabloid press- i1.wp.com/realclimatescience.com/wp-cont.. The CRU is tabloid press- stevengoddard.files.wordpress.com/2013/0.. Do you have any more relevant ones from the 70's to search XYZ ice age and paste the the results here? It was considered a scientific fact. The 100's of directly quoted scientists and the US government warning are all tabloid press! Wilful ignorance is not an excuse and no way to go through life.
2020-01-12 11:09
these are all pictures of tabloid press. are you joking or are you trying to make a point here? the media makes a living from headlines, and they make even more money if they make a headline debunking the myths they themselves have presented.
2020-01-12 11:15
They are all direct quotes from the leading climatologists and agencies of their time. If you want to track down the underlying academic papers that led NASA, NOAA and the rest of the leading climatologists of their time to say a billion will die from the ice age like NOAA guy did-that's on you.
2020-01-12 11:19
>if you want to look into science and not tabloid press and woke blogs, that's on you oh don't worry, I knew that was beyond your capabilities. I did it for you :)
2020-01-12 11:28
I am an applied scientist that lived through it. You're a kid posting opinions calling them facts. You wasted my time and can go fuck yourself.
2020-01-12 11:43
>Do you have any more relevant ones from the 70's to search XYZ ice age and paste the the results here? why didn't you ask this before? journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/200.. this is what a scientific report looks like. this is not tabloid. I skimmed the report and they found 7 papers ranging from between 1965 and 1979 predicting NOT an ice age, but a continuation of the global cooling that was happening at the time. the reports they found are linked and you can go read them yourself. these are the reports that the tabloid have used for their headlines. unfortunately for your statement that there was scientific consensus that the earth was about to head into an ice age, not only did they not find a single scientific paper saying this, they found 44 papers prediciting global warming. even though the world was cooling at the time. 6 times as many papers concluded that the earth was about to heat up as opposed to cooling down. not a single paper concluded that the earth was about to head into another ice age. so the climate science you read about in the tabloids and in your blogs that you are linking is not true. there was no scientific consensus that the earth was heading into another ice age. better luck with your next reply, hope it goes better for you :) tell me again please, who is wilfully ignorant?
2020-01-12 11:25
No ice age just a cooling period! Semantics unless one is of course willfully ignorant. That is not a scientific paper. it is an opinion. That is why The world at the time was trying to figure out ways to insulate the planet's heat. That is not something the world is under taking based on a myth. You wasted my time for nothing, you can go fuck yourself.
2020-01-12 11:53
oh that's opinion, searching for scientific consensus through the published literature? and you saying it was scientific consensus that the earth was entering a new ice age is still factual? it seems you're projecting this wilful ingorance you speak of :) ' you present me with random cutouts from tabloid press and claim it's proof of what is scientific consensus in the 1970s. I present you with a 14 page paper presenting all the published scientific literature on the subject from the peroid and you claim it's an opinion. you got fucking destroyed you imbecile.
2020-01-12 12:12
Unlike you, I am not willfully ignorant. I actually watched your video and have started to read this opinion as I am very curious about how this revisionist history took place. To begin with the movement started in the mid 50's not 60's. I'll figure out why the 50's material was excluded but I'm pretty sure that I already know why it was omitted. It is all semantics so far. In 1974 a six degree drop in global temps was considered a coming ice age-in 2008 the same thing is considered a continued cooling trend. One guys says if this continues it will result in an ice age your guy concludes that doesn't mean he said an ice age is imminent. NCAR guy says temps are expected to be lower and more variable, citing increased glaciation-normal people would conclude ice age coming-your guy says continued cooling. I may or may not finish reading it but it is obviously not only an opinion-it is a bought and paid for opinion who's sole purpose is to mitigate the previous wrong. The only thing that you destroyed around here was bandwidth.
2020-01-12 12:43
where's this scientific paper that predicts a six degree decrease in global temperatures?
2020-01-12 12:46
From NASA but it is an if man keeps doing this then the temps will drop 6 degrees-your guy considers this myth. Omega lulz- you didn't even bother reading your own link. But it is a paper and says myth at the top! Go fuck yourself.
2020-01-12 12:57
nope, skimmed through it and didn't see anything about 6 degrees or even nasa.
2020-01-12 13:11
and if I think of it-I will email the authors and explicitly ask for objective parameters to define the difference between a continued cooling period and a pending ice age- as the one thing for sure was not constant. Oh but this is a comprehensive paper leaving out 20yrs worth of material completely devoid of objective parameters. You don't know the first thing about applied science, that is for sure.
2020-01-12 12:50
what years were left out? you said yourself that this myth comes from the 70's, they included literature from 1965 to 1979. it's like you desperately want to go back as far as possible to find more and more primitive science to find something wrong. climate science was wrong in the 1970's, it was wrong in the 1950's and it's wrong today. but like all science, the scientific method is used to aproach truth.
2020-01-12 12:57
#5
syrsoN | 
Germany PeKay 
Walking meme that bitch aslong with Twitter cringe
2020-01-12 09:29
#14
 | 
Sweden wtf_men 
Well apparently world politics is brought to us through twitter these days. One can get the latest news of Trump and Kylie Jenner at the same time, how convenient
2020-01-12 09:38
#19
 | 
Indonesia Namesk1Y 
SO NADAL > ALL OF TENNIS team
2020-01-12 09:58
Djokobitch > all I hope he surpasses Federer's GS record cuz he is the best
2020-01-12 10:00
wtf why doesn't she pick capitalism ? it is not eco friendly for sure
2020-01-12 10:22
#31
 | 
Netherlands HetIsPatat 
"like everyone can't travel across the Atlantic in a million dollar yacht like Greta" I'm sure Federer can 😎👍
2020-01-12 10:28
#61
friberg | 
Sweden günT 
+1 lol out of all the arguments to be made you go with that one? federer is hardly just any person
2020-01-12 12:52
who the fck is gretard and why do people listen to her? there are bunch of scientists who you can listen to, god damn it. this girl doesnt even go to school.
2020-01-12 10:32
You guys still didn't realise or what. What Greta does is offer a service. Top corporations pay her parents and then her pr manager criticizes the person told. Greta is just innocent bystander with a cute face
2020-01-12 10:55
imagine using your kid and destroying her childhood to push a political agenda, her parents are disgusting delusional rich retards from sweden
2020-01-12 10:58
#41
OCEAN | 
Reunion 1iquser 
greta is only slowing the process of addressing climate change lmao
2020-01-12 11:04
#44
 | 
Sweden wtf_men 
greta = make everyone hate climate change activists maybe her agenda is to stall environmental progress. 200iq play
2020-01-12 11:08
greta is just like trump a publicity act to distract humanity from the real problems. AKA modern slavery.
2020-01-12 11:05
#49
 | 
Sweden GeT_CoRrEcT 
Plastic straws, plastic bags, cars. We're all paying for it but her spoiled ass and her equals have no restrictions including her beloved "politicians". Don't you see they just need a reason to milk as much money off of you as possible. Not saying anything about climate change, only her "solutions".
2020-01-12 11:35
I got amused when she used helicopter instead of walking through city
2020-01-12 12:15
I would never hit a child but if I saw her in person...
2020-01-12 12:19
this fucking autist needs to get her brain checked she probably went down another level in the down syndrome scale
2020-01-12 12:44
We cant save the planet from humanity unless we kill off about 5 billion people and set a global limit on births
2020-01-12 12:50
#70
 | 
United Kingdom Megamo10 
Who says she travels in 1M yachty?
2020-01-12 13:14
#74
 | 
United Kingdom Megamo10 
Lol that's loose change
2020-01-12 16:04
#62
 | 
Brazil 1930 
the guardian LMAO
2020-01-12 12:53
#63
 | 
Ethiopia sexiestuser 
why do you guys question greta? like she just says some dumb shit shes told to say and lives a really nice life off it, any hltv user would have done the same for that juicy cash retards who follow ones like greta are the problem
2020-01-12 12:55
What a sad human being.
2020-01-12 12:57
Incept
3.56
madlikewizards
1.28
Gen.G
1.80
North
1.99
W7M
2.14
DETONA
1.68
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.