The player ranking has to be based on measurable criteria to be objective. Yes device lifted more trophies and won 2 majors but those are TEAM ACHIEVEMENTS! Xyp, dupreeh and Magisk are all in the top 20, so obviously device's contribution to the victories was rather marginal. ZywOo and s1 carried their teams which is reflected in their rating 2.0. People really need to distinguish between team achievements and individual ones
How many kills don't you think Device would get if you were to put him into mdl with a group of mm players? Astralis have 5 great players all competing for the limelight Zywoo and S1mple can just bait, and get their teammates to set up for them. The only exception to this is electronic.
NaVi played against top team. It doesn't matter whether it was during group stage or playoffs because reaching playoffs is already depending on the performance of the whole team! S1mple got his stats by performing well against top teams at big events even though Navi lost as A TEAM
S0.3mple played va top teams? He literally had below 1 rating every time navi didnt face some shit ass washed up mibr rofl.
Like shox said: to be the best u need to make ur team win. Whole navi is set around s0.3mple and all he gets is .06 better rating than device or elige who both actually played vs actual top 5s where the real competition is.
Now sit down kid.
"Now sit down kid." this AD-HOMINEM argument is not only pretty unconvincing but it's also pretty inaccurate considering that I'm probably older than you with my nearly 27 years and having a PhD in mathematics
Dropping out of groups after facing bunch of t2s and mibr to float ur stats and playing vs actual top 5s is also a quite significant difference. Wonder why no s0.3mple anywhere to be seen on the stats page in 2k19 top 5 l3l