Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Coronavirus vs flu
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
I did a quick research, not sure if it’s accurate or not. In a good year in USA, only 5% get the flu. In the worst year, up to 20% get the flu. If this % is the same internationally, that means at the lowest 390M gets the flu, and at the highest (20%) 1.58 billion gets the flu. According to WHO, flu kills at the lowest point 250K to 500K (highest) a year. So let’s say only 5% of the earth population (7.8b) gets the flu, that’s 390 million. 390M infected, only 500K dies, that’s a death rate at 0.128% Coronavirus have killed 1.3K when 64.xK is infected, that means Coronavirus have a death rate at 2.14%. How much more deadly is the coronavirus from the flu? 0.128 (flu) times 16.7 = 2.13 So the coronavirus is 16.7 times more deadly then the flu. Please correct me if I’m wrong, would love to do some indept research after my work, so need feedback on this.
2020-02-14 13:40
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
I agree.... corona is responsible for our failed math tests
2020-02-14 13:41
#3
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
Wait, I thought we applyed the «gun kills people logic», what means pen make me fail at test
2020-02-14 13:43
You are right, but corona is in deep web now for 40$ if you want
2020-02-14 13:44
ok
2020-02-14 13:48
Your process of judging the world based on the USA doesn't add up. So your calculation is flawed in that way
2020-02-14 13:44
#8
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
LOL, god damn it america, your high anti-vaccine populations ruin my calculation...
2020-02-14 13:46
#28
 | 
North America FutureOfNA 
you can thank the mom groups of america for spreading their anti-doctor indoctrination over the fear of a little autism
2020-02-14 14:17
#35
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
You can also thank the american medical industry, because they actually have done much shady things making the whole system lose trust by the people. And from there, the conspiarcy community have snorred the topic as cocain, going nuts all over it. Majority of medicial stuff and vaccines are real, some are pure scam to make money.
2020-02-14 15:46
0% death rate in usa 😎😎😎
2020-02-14 13:46
#12
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
Pris, not talking about corona, but flu since I used that as a source to compare.
2020-02-14 13:49
#6
HenkkyG | 
Czech Republic cortan 
Bro, idgaf. Just stop stressing
2020-02-14 13:45
#10
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
I’m not stressing, but your sister is stressing after I told her I was in asia some months back.
2020-02-14 13:47
both weak viruses 😎😎
2020-02-14 13:45
#11
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
Doesnt matter if it’s weak when it’s very easily spreading. Will kill many 4:3 eye people
2020-02-14 13:48
no
2020-02-14 13:51
No its the same shit
2020-02-14 13:51
hope corona kill me tired of this life
2020-02-14 13:51
Ok brb mens))))
2020-02-14 13:52
There are more variables to consider, for example how many are left untreated, health services in specific country... maybe the same number of infected people in Japan would not result in the same amount of deaths as in China, so it's hard to point accurately how deadly the virus really is
2020-02-14 13:51
I am more powerful than any flu
2020-02-14 13:52
> Coronavirus have killed 1.3K when 64.xK is infected, that means Coronavirus have a death rate at 2.14%. not sure if bait but reported just in case
2020-02-14 13:54
#31
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
Atleast 64K, the last part is .x (unknow).
2020-02-14 14:31
death rate = deaths to closed cases (either dead or recovered), not deaths to all cases real death rate rn is about 16% worldometers.info/coronavirus/
2020-02-14 14:38
due to forecast of BO3 coronavirus will kill 2/3 poulation if not the whole humanity
2020-02-14 13:57
ok and?
2020-02-14 13:58
#37
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
What you want?
2020-02-14 16:11
that is really bad research, you could also say coronavirus death rate outside asia is less than 0,4%... If you want accurate stats you need to find information for every country, because you know some countries have less or more infected people per year...
2020-02-14 14:02
+1
2020-02-14 14:06
#36
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
To early to count on death outside China. But I did it anyway, it’s 3 death out of 367. That’s 0.87 going upword as days go by.
2020-02-14 16:08
2 days ago it was 500 infected, weird how infections outside china are decreasing isn't it? P. S. to be precise on 11th February there was 476 infections outside of China, So again your calculations are still shit, if you can't even find accurate information don't even bother to calculate it...
2020-02-14 17:14
#40
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
Nah, it’s fine, I didnt add «other» to the calculation. So it’s the currently most accurate. So buhu for you.
2020-02-14 17:52
#23
dycha | 
Poland zmija9 
with my luck i would die if death rate would have 0.01%
2020-02-14 14:04
this is really bad because you dont have medicine against corona.
2020-02-14 14:08
Mortality rate in Wuhan was 4.9%. Mortality rate in the Hubei Province was 3.1%. Mortality rate nationwide was 2.1%. Fatality rate in other provinces was 0.16%. death cases: more than 80% are elderly over 60 years old, and more than 75% had underlying diseases present such as cardiovascular and cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and, in some cases, tumor.
2020-02-14 14:13
#29
pronax | 
Hungary Gombi_ 
This and the fact that there isn't a vaccine to prevent the Corona virus however we have one for the flu. Just give it a year or two and people will forget this bullshit.
2020-02-14 14:24
Coronavirus death rate is higher than what you calculated because some of the infected will still die. Fatality rates can only be calculated for groups where everyone either recovered or died, if you include people that are still sick it's obviously incorrect. And your flu rate is likely too low too as the US is a relatively rich and modern country, so more people die in poor countries. Anyway, your general point that corona is worse than the flu is obviously still correct.
2020-02-14 14:15
#32
 | 
Norway Markus98h 
«Coronavirus death rate is higher than what you calculated because some of the infected will still die» true, but it should be the most accurate so far. We will have to wait for Coronavirus to die out by itself, just like SARS died before they mamaged to make a vaccine, even if SARS was continue to spread, it just died by itself, like there was a secret expire dato on the virus.
2020-02-14 14:37
#30
NEO | 
Canada chedca 
you aren't clearly defining flu, avian influenza? A or B? from which year?
2020-02-14 14:28
#34
 | 
Brazil jacksfurions 
corona is flu
2020-02-14 14:41
We DON'T KNOW the death rate of the virus yet. There are too many unknowns in play. 1. We don't know how many are actually infected. It is estimated we only know 10% of the cases - and that's even if China ISN'T fabricating numbers. 2. We don't know the actual number of deaths. 3. Incubation period can be extremely long 1 to 5 (previously thought to be the average) to 24 days before symptoms show. In half of that time, the virus is already capable of infecting others. 3.b Because the incubation period is 10 days longer than the previously thought 2 weeks, our quarantine measures for suspected-but-untested cases have effectively been inefficient. 4. Currently, 20% of the infected require ICU. The period patients stay in ICU and either recover, or die (which so far, is another 20% of the cases) is another 24 days. 5. There's a ridiculous amount of cases of people who have supposedly recovered, but have then been reinfected, or more likely: didn't truly recover. 6. It would appear to be very slick at spreading, having a R0 up to 12+ since it has now been confirmed it can be spread aerosolized. Meaning it is about as fucking infectious as the measles, and common seasonal flu with it's R0 of 1,3-1,4 is a fucking joke in comparison. Thus, it can take up to 2 fucking months for the patients to show symptoms (24 days), fall into the state where they need intensive care (week), and THEN die or recover (another 24 days). It has been less than a MONTH since we had only 45 confirmed cases. The only silver lining here is that outside China, only 3 people have died and 87 have supposedly recovered. However, going by chinese cases, we can't be sure whether they have truly recovered, or can come back with a vengeance. Also, it does have a name now: SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2).
2020-02-14 16:47
Illuminar
1.66
PACT
2.17
Sprout
1.44
PACT
2.71
pro100
2.49
Sprout
1.46
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.