Thread has been deleted
Last comment
i7 9700 vs 9700kf vs 9700k
 | 
Denmark MR_JOHN_WICK 
Im planning to upgrade my pc and these are the ones that Im considering can you tell me which one should I get btw I WONT OC
2020-02-20 09:11
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
Get AMD, better, faster and stronger
2020-02-20 09:12
looool
2020-02-20 09:13
#3
 | 
Armenia PANZERSHARK 
+1
2020-02-20 09:13
worse, slower, cheaper
2020-02-20 09:22
no no yes
2020-02-20 09:36
actually in games intel>amd Rendering and multitasking intel<amd
2020-02-20 11:24
I was talking about everything so AMD better
2020-02-20 13:58
wrong. in games intel still owns.
2020-02-20 13:59
#86
XANTARES | 
Europe chupe 
yeah, by 5-10 fps, i rather save 400 euros and lose 5 fps
2020-02-20 14:02
+1
2020-02-20 14:04
can u expain that 400e? 9600k>ryzen 5 3600x and same priced 9700k>ryzen 7 3700x and same priced 9900k>ryzen 9 3900x and same priced so wtf u are talking? btw 2 month and amd will get knocked out when new processors come out.
2020-02-20 14:16
#109
jks | 
Switzerland cykalater 
9700k/3700x not even same priced. more and more games are developped for multi cores and the future will be theirs for sure. we will see :) #fuckintel
2020-02-20 14:26
u clearly dont know intel releases new processors in 2 months. And games wont support multicores yet and it will take 1-2 years for that support. when we get games with support we have many new gen processors. but live in your suicidesquare and hope best. btw 9700k 377e and 3700x 359e so same priced imo.
2020-02-20 14:30
#114
jks | 
Switzerland cykalater 
there are games who support my finnish friend. ofc "you" will have many new processors, theres no doubt. intel never dissapoints in releasing new shit without any relevant improvements, just like apple. dont stay too long in your sauna iceman
2020-02-20 14:31
10 cores 20 threads and 5.2ghz turbo clock. ok man just ok. AMD will cry.
2020-02-20 14:35
#122
jks | 
Switzerland cykalater 
can't see anything special here
2020-02-20 14:37
>"10 cores 20 threads and 5.2ghz" >"And games wont support multicores yet and it will take 1-2 years for that support." therefore, we can deduce that the only improvement that will matter (to you) is the 4% clock speed increase Zen3 expected to bring 10-15% improvement sooooo
2020-02-20 23:50
#219
 | 
Australia strikebacK 
as an intel fanboy myself i don't see intel winning with their new cpus, leaks are already out and shows that ryzen still beats the new 10xxx series intel cpus edit: and i've just bought an amd myself
2020-02-23 14:37
#213
daps | 
North America JC_123 
"games wont support multicores yet" LOL
2020-02-23 12:34
People here were suggesting 9700k and 9900k, their price is around 600 and 900 dollars, compared to much lower prices for 3600x and 3700x which are really good enough, buying 9900k will get you 3700x and high end motherboard for that price and possibly 16gb of ram memory, paired with good gpu will get you stable 60 fps in 1080p and 250+fps in cs go.
2020-02-20 17:25
9700k is 379e 3700x 349e i dont see big difference
2020-02-20 17:26
#212
daps | 
North America JC_123 
Except in real life it's 9600k<3600 and 3600 is cheaper 9700k=3700x and they're the same price, but 3700x will absolutely destroy 9700k in anything else. 9900k>3900x for games
2020-02-23 12:34
my 9600k @5.2GHz pwn any 3600 or 3700 at gaming just saying.
2020-02-23 14:21
#217
daps | 
North America JC_123 
it'd be within 15% (that's at absolute max. Some new games like BFV, FFXV they'll be about equal) of a stock 3600 but the 9600k costs 30% more without even considering the price of the cooling it takes to OC that high.
2020-02-23 14:26
watercooling. 9600k 259e and 3600x 229e in finland. So i dont get where u got that 30% And intel+asus got some nice bundles where u can get cashback 40 to 100€ so in the end its even cheaper.
2020-02-23 15:33
#239
daps | 
North America JC_123 
Finland is very different then. AMD's distribution there must be really bad. In USA for example r5 3600 is $175, i5 9600k is $250. Then you need a cooler for the 9600k as well.
2020-02-23 16:14
i dream to see your 5.2ghz in your 9600k because it's very rare to find the golden cpu on a 9600k :)
2020-02-23 15:45
9600k>ryzen 5 3600x and same priced - 3600 and 3600x are cheaper than 9600k 9700k>ryzen 7 3700x and same priced - 3700x is way cheaper 9900k>ryzen 9 3900x and same priced - and ryzen is cheaper again. Comeback when you will learn how to use amazon.
2020-02-23 14:39
who cares about amazon prices? overprized shit.
2020-02-23 15:30
Soooooo overpriced that 3700x costs about 310$ when you said 3700x is about 349e in #149.... sure bud, overpriced. And new 9700k is almost 400$ amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-3700X-16-Thread-Pro..
2020-02-23 15:34
in finland 9700k 400e and 3700x 350e If u buy intel+asus bundle wich is very good u can get 40-100e cashback so they are kinda same priced.
2020-02-23 15:36
310$ vs 400$ gyazo.com/74a987fff951ef24a2bf96eda9ba51.. Do you even math?
2020-02-23 15:35
look up
2020-02-23 15:36
Edits because you lost LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Go suck a fat one
2020-02-23 15:37
what i lost? u trying to prove something what u cant.
2020-02-23 15:38
+1 ryzen all the way if you are aiming for value/price. and price/performance.
2020-02-20 14:57
yes you are missing the point... I was talking about every part of performance not just games... your name is Einst3in but your IQ is very low...
2020-02-20 14:04
u are kinda fucking stupid, u said "EVERYTHING" so stop acting like clever. U just cant use that word if it isnt true.
2020-02-20 14:13
everything Definition of everything 1a: all that exists b: all that relates to the subject 2: all that is important 3: all sorts of other things —used to indicate related but unspecified events, facts, or conditions
2020-02-20 14:15
And what u are trying to say? u already proved u fucked up and u have no real argument,
2020-02-20 14:18
I meant AMD is better in everything combined, not everything separately
2020-02-20 14:19
U clearly dont understand. u cant use that word if u say something like that because its lie. It should go AMD is better combined than Intel.
2020-02-20 14:21
ok
2020-02-20 14:21
as u wish. just know Einst3in allways right.
2020-02-20 14:22
mad kid with i3 6100?
2020-02-20 10:32
#235
 | 
Finland Hknsininen 
intel cry is free mens)))
2020-02-23 15:45
#63
 | 
Finland idukxd 
+cheaper
2020-02-20 11:26
+1
2020-02-20 12:04
#90
 | 
Norway at0mic_cs 
AMD is superior in rendering, streaming and multitasking NOT in gaming Gaming is more reliant on singlecore performance which is where intel is currently dominant. Though games are slowly going into multicore which is where AMD is extremely powerful
2020-02-20 14:05
And intel releases before that new processors so i guess intel gonna own soon again.
2020-02-20 14:19
#119
 | 
Norway at0mic_cs 
Well for games like no man's sky, which is sometimes reliant on multicore performance due to it's heavy amount of particles AMD is my preferred option, and AMD is catching up to intel at a rapid pace so I'd say soon AMD might be the preferred option for some gaming
2020-02-20 14:36
These "new" processors are just the rebrand of the rebrand of the rebrand of the rebrand of the old skylake 6700k with more cores, since its the same µarch.
2020-02-20 17:39
#174
 | 
Norway at0mic_cs 
wish they would ditch 14nm already
2020-02-20 17:42
the problem isnt even 14nm but their 5 year old µarch, Ryzen 3000 has much higher IPC, if they would run at the same clockspeeds as Intel does it would be R.I.P
2020-02-20 17:53
actually Ryzen 3000 has a higher singlecore performance as well.
2020-02-20 17:36
#171
 | 
Norway at0mic_cs 
the ryzen 7 3700x got a 5714 singlecore performance geekbench score, the i7 9700k gets a 6297 tech-touch.info/wp-content/uploads/42357.. hexus.net/media/uploaded/2018/9/a3480fde..
2020-02-20 17:40
geekbench is a useless benchmark for CPU performance. I can give you benchmarks of the same pc running windows geekbench and macOS geekbench the macOS scores will be much higher. Have a look at Cinebench R15 or R20 to get a realistic benchmark for CPUs across all platforms. btw these two benchmark runs didnt even use the same version of geekbench, so you cant compare them at all.
2020-02-20 17:47
#214
daps | 
North America JC_123 
+1 geekbench userbench all garbage
2020-02-23 12:35
#115
 | 
Canada SparklMastr 
+1
2020-02-20 14:33
#127
 | 
Finland ksyppe 
yes new amds very strong in csgo.
2020-02-20 14:39
#168
 | 
World Beard43 
+1 AMD is much better atm. Intel is really struggling at the moment.
2020-02-20 17:35
+1
2020-02-20 18:46
#193
 | 
United States Hunter_Biden 
gayer
2020-02-21 09:22
+1
2020-02-23 14:33
#4
 | 
Serbia HLEB 
i7 9700k
2020-02-20 09:14
#6
 | 
Denmark MR_JOHN_WICK 
can you tell me the reason? considering I wont oc
2020-02-20 09:14
600mhz faster base clock, 200mhz faster boost clock.
2020-02-20 09:17
#10
 | 
Denmark MR_JOHN_WICK 
btw can you recommend me a micro atx mobo for 9700k
2020-02-20 09:20
#13
 | 
Australia Zilox 
I have the rog strix z 390i very sexy and good
2020-02-20 09:22
#15
 | 
Denmark MR_JOHN_WICK 
we dont have any z390i in turkey
2020-02-20 09:23
I'd pick MSI MAG B365M MORTAR p.s. but I haven't done any research for intel. I did so just because I found b450m mortar to be best option for my ryzen 5 3600 build.
2020-02-20 09:29
#20
 | 
Denmark MR_JOHN_WICK 
can u tell me your fps in faceit if you play
2020-02-20 09:34
#185
rain | 
Czech Republic CyberBOT 
You should only get a 'K' series CPU if you're also getting a Z series motherboard. The K signifies unlocked multiplier, meaning you can overclock the CPU yourself. To do that, you need a motherboard that supports it, and these are all Z series.
2020-02-20 23:33
Not really related to the topic, but I'd recommend switching to regular ATX from mATX if you can. Maybe it's just my big hands, but for me, it's a hell to try to replace anything on an mATX board. Also usually the air flow is better on regular.
2020-02-20 09:54
#9
 | 
Serbia HLEB 
i7 9700 - Processor Base Frequency 3.00 GHz turbo 4.7 i7 9700k - Processor Base Frequency 3.60 GHz tubro 4.9 its 50$ difference and u live in denmark i have i9 9900k and i regret not buying i7 9700k, coz its best procesor for cs, more fps than i9
2020-02-20 09:19
#12
 | 
Denmark MR_JOHN_WICK 
I live in Turkey just fake flagging :( my financial situation is not the best
2020-02-20 09:19
#25
 | 
Serbia HLEB 
still save 50 $ and u get cpu that u can use for next 5y at least
2020-02-20 09:39
#27
 | 
Denmark MR_JOHN_WICK 
what do you think about ryzens?
2020-02-20 09:40
why would you buy the expensive 9700k then? Go for the cheap R5 3600 and save the difference, since you wont notice any in games.
2020-02-20 17:41
You regret buying the i9? How do you have lower fps then 9700K? you have 2 CPUs you benchmarked?
2020-02-20 10:31
#207
 | 
Europe Vallon3 
How is the 9900k inferior to 9700k in CS?
2020-02-21 21:47
#209
 | 
Serbia HLEB 
idk i have shadows on high 8x,4x and still around 300 fps while some ppl with i7 9700k and same settings have more
2020-02-21 23:31
Get me fatter, saltier and softer than your gf/wife
2020-02-20 09:15
9700k of 9700kf (second one doesnt have video core and have bit better overclocking potential)
2020-02-20 09:23
#19
 | 
Denmark MR_JOHN_WICK 
I wont oc but kf is just a little bit cheaper
2020-02-20 09:27
cuz it doesnt have integrated video , so if you dont need it buy KF
2020-02-20 09:58
#198
 | 
Norway rain4prez 
I got kf for christmas, 10/10 reccomended
2020-02-21 09:43
#18
 | 
Denmark MR_JOHN_WICK 
is msi z390m mortar ok for 9700k?
2020-02-20 09:26
#224
 | 
Russia NikSmoK 
only good entry lvl motherboard is z390ud Gigabyte.
2020-02-23 15:31
Dude wtf are you doing? Get the ryzen 7 3700x. I got the 9700k months before ryzen new cpu came out because i couldnt wait and needed a new cpu asap but i regret it. Ryzen destroys anything intel has price and performance wise. Otherwise if you still want an intel cpu just wait for the new 10th gen.
2020-02-20 09:34
#26
 | 
Denmark MR_JOHN_WICK 
really? are amds good for csgo either?
2020-02-20 09:40
3700x crushes anything intel has to offer ESPECIALLY on CS GO. Go check the benchmarks. Lets not even talk about productivity and multitasking. 9700k does not even have hyperthreading. So if you really want an intel cpu just wait for the new ones because the 9th generation has been destroyed by AMD.
2020-02-20 09:42
no. amd has barely reached close to intels performance levels. would hardly call that "destroyed"
2020-02-20 11:48
Yes it is destroyed because amd costs SIGNIFICANTLY LESS. Go pay 100$ more for 1% of performance gains in intel in games lmfaoo. AMD is CLEARLY better when it comes to multi-tasking that's not even a question. INTEL is slightly better on games just slightly not even noticable. Especially if you have to choose between 9700k and the 3700x that's a no brainer dude.
2020-02-20 14:03
10th gen will get de_stroyed as well since it still has the same µarch. 10th gen will not be faster at all.
2020-02-20 17:43
I know but im saying if he wants only intel and nothing else he should wait for 10th gen.
2020-02-20 18:10
3k series is better performance wise in everthing than intels current gen
2020-02-20 09:42
+1
2020-02-20 14:06
#173
 | 
World Beard43 
Mate, check out some YouTube review channels. Gamers Nexus, Hardware Unboxed, Linus might even do some reviews. Spoiler alert though, most reviewers consider the 3600 to be the best all round gaming CPU at the moment (great price without sacrificing performance) but if you're looking at the 9700 it's definitely worth comparing with the 3700x.
2020-02-20 17:41
Makes sense to get intel, if you want to avoid risk running into issues while building the pc. Also is still better than ryzen by slim margin, regardless of higher costs.
2020-02-20 09:41
Lmfaoo it is better BY THE SLIGHTEST margin ever and it is not better in cs go which is prob what this guy wants it for. Ryzen is 1000x better price to performance wise. And btw what issues could one possibly get because they chose amd lmfao? The only "issue" is that you need to get higher frequency ram otherwise there's nothing else to worry about.
2020-02-20 09:44
Intel is a same architecture rehashed for 4th+ years in row, it basically is guaranteed to work. For Ryzen 2nd* gen it took months for mobo manufacturers to dish out bios* updates to fix all problems, and even so the motherboard you happen to get might have one of the older bios on and who knows what else. I waited for 2+ months before bios version came out that felt good enough to start building my Ryzen 5 3600 system on. I have seen plenty of information on people running into issues building zen2 systems. AMD just isn't as big company as Intel to have it all sorted out on day 1. *mashing words together without care, fixed
2020-02-20 09:57
Intel doesn't have everything ready on day 1 wtf. No one does...
2020-02-20 10:08
Why, do you remember examples from new Intel gen releases?
2020-02-20 10:11
The last Intel architecture I've owned was Skylake and I remember having some stability issues with it in the beginning.
2020-02-20 10:22
There are no more problems with amd anymore. The cpu's have been out for a while now. There is literally no point in getting a 9700k over a 3700x. You are basically fucking yourself and throwing money in the toilet. If you still want an intel cpu you should wait for the 10th gen.
2020-02-20 14:05
There might still be older boards circulating around with predated bios versions.
2020-02-20 14:25
True but updating the bios is not a big problem at all. That does not justify spending more for a worse cpu.
2020-02-20 14:59
#28
 | 
Sweden geekaya 
If you want best value/fps get the 9600kf combined with gigabyte z390 ud. Dont go too cheap on the cpu cooling, if it gets too hot it will throttle down. Dont go itx if you dont have the money for it.
2020-02-20 09:43
#35
 | 
Denmark MR_JOHN_WICK 
I wont go for mini itx but would going for micro atx make any problems?
2020-02-20 09:43
#40
 | 
Sweden geekaya 
If you get a good mitx case/cpu cooler combo u should be fine, its all about keeping the temps down. Check gigabyte z390 m gaming. Also check nexusgaming on youtube before you decide on which case to buy. Low temps are very important for reliable fps. edit* gamers nexus
2020-02-20 09:47
#43
 | 
Denmark MR_JOHN_WICK 
Thank you very much my friend
2020-02-20 09:54
#29
 | 
Kazakhstan Spe11 
9700k is the best, and you dont need to oc because it has turbo boost also oc not worth it. i bought 9700 because didnt have moeny on 9700k but if i had i definetely choose him. but 10k series coming soon and it will present better money/performance processors so i would wait on your place. Btw i have gtx970 and 300 fps on 4:3 in cs go so doesnt really matter what u choose.
2020-02-20 09:41
#37
 | 
Denmark MR_JOHN_WICK 
any expected date of release?
2020-02-20 09:44
#39
 | 
Kazakhstan Spe11 
i think april-may this year
2020-02-20 09:45
#32
Kylar | 
Other rssyo 
I have the 9700kf with asus rog z390-f board and its a rlly good cpu for csgo
2020-02-20 09:42
#44
cyx | 
Denmark VojenZ 
Yes 9700KF would I go for.
2020-02-20 09:55
#48
MACKO | 
Brazil schmoko 
3700x retard
2020-02-20 10:09
+1111
2020-02-20 17:10
you dont need i7 9700k if you got gpu just go with i7 9700kf
2020-02-20 10:16
F - without video core.
2020-02-20 10:19
If you don't plan on overclocking -> 9700 If you plan on overclocking -> 9700K / KF The difference between K and KF is that the KF won't display unless you have a GPU. I currently have a 9700K overclocked to 5.0 GHz with a Corsair H100i Platinum AIO
2020-02-20 10:26
#56
 | 
CIS okna_96 
if u dont want overclock, buy amd ryzen bruh (intel only for overclockers)
2020-02-20 10:34
go amd if you're getting a new motherboard. the ryzen 3xxx series is really, really good. if you aren't overclocking and for whatever reason need to go intel, go for a non-k model, whichever is cheaper of the 9700 and 9700f. the slightly higher base clock speed on k models is pretty much irrelevant and you'll be saving like 50 bucks. the only reason to get a k model is to overclock. if the f and non-f models are the same price, go for the non-f version, cuz having integrated graphics is handy if your graphics card goes out.
2020-02-20 10:38
#62
 | 
Finland Hietsu 
kf edition doesnt have integrated gpu on it.
2020-02-20 11:25
#68
Dima | 
Russia ty1ercs 
i7 9700 is the same as i7 9700k, but "k" means, that you can OC this CPU. If you wont OC, you can choose i7 9700
2020-02-20 11:44
9700k(f) or ryzen 3700x. I'd buy ryzen. better value for sure for your money.
2020-02-20 11:53
#74
 | 
Greece her-1g 
get amd. there is literally no reason to buy intel in 2020
2020-02-20 12:00
#99
 | 
Cyprus Swishh_ 
Which AMD would you get instead of an i5 9600kf?
2020-02-20 14:16
#113
 | 
Greece her-1g 
actually i5 9600kf is really good for his money. i would buy it. ryzen shines mostly at high end models
2020-02-20 14:31
#128
 | 
Cyprus Swishh_ 
That's what I did. I bought the i5 9600kf 190€ 😊
2020-02-20 14:50
#211
 | 
Greece her-1g 
i have an i5 8600k (i made my pc back in 2018) and im running everything just perfect.
2020-02-23 12:30
#154
 | 
World ZMDR 
3500X or 3600
2020-02-20 16:18
why get a k model if u wont oc? thats really stupid
2020-02-20 14:38
INTEL XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
2020-02-20 15:03
#147
pava | 
Europe Raco_br 
I7-9700kf even if you dont want oc it comes with higher base clock and you dont need a igpu. Some where down the road you might want to OC and the diference in price is minimal.
2020-02-20 15:07
i7 9700KF and i7 9700K are the same cpu's, but the first without integrated graphics and cheaper. go with i7 9700KF
2020-02-20 15:09
#149
 | 
Brazil hsk- 
just go AMD. RYZEN 7 3800X. or 3900X; Why limit yourself with shitty intel and only 8 cores with no hyperthreading?... intel is only good if you buy 9900k and above... but in general.. go AMD.. gaming diff only 5% with zen2..and more threads.. people still talking about intel in 2020..lull. you can get a lot more cores and performance for less or same $$ with amd....
2020-02-20 15:20
#153
 | 
World ZMDR 
If you're going Intel then get the best, 9900K. Otherwise buy Ryzen 3700X. 9700K is a joke product.
2020-02-20 16:17
#157
Jame | 
Italy Laxity 
9700kf
2020-02-20 16:26
#158
 | 
United States n3h 
Seeing as they are pretty much all the same price. Ive had 9700k since release and still running strong as fuck @ 4.0Ghz 9700K will give you more performance if you plan on overclocking. 9700f will take less power to run save you a tiny bit money on electric bill ($19 vs $27(9700k) per year) 9700 - NO
2020-02-20 16:35
non K cant OC KF doesnt have integrated graphics which will result in quite slower times in adobe after effects K can OC and has integrated graphics I think you should just get the cheapest.
2020-02-20 17:24
#186
 | 
Korea kaiske 
Just get 9900k unless you are poor??
2020-02-20 23:43
#196
rain | 
Czech Republic CyberBOT 
You do realize that there are different usecases and some favor one CPU more than the other and vice versa?
2020-02-21 09:36
#197
flusha | 
Germany Alle! 
If you are never ever going to oc just get the cheapest out of the three , if you use your pc for anything beside gaming i would take the ryzen 3800x/3700x in consideration
2020-02-21 09:42
9700K or 9700KF 9700K==>GPU integrated in the CPU (if your principal GPU is down that can be usefull otherwise it's completely useless) 9700KF==>No GPU integrated in the CPU I've got the 9700KF and it's pretty good. But yeah AMD better value/price but you need to got the good chipset and change the motherboard.
2020-02-21 09:44
#208
 | 
Czech Republic DemoroCZ 
Ryzen 3700x + some b450/x570 motherboard + 3200mhz memory
2020-02-21 21:50
#210
 | 
United States jay_320 
I've owned a 3900x and X570 Master motherboard since launch day. I waited outside a microcenter like a fat nerd to get it. Anyway. It's a great chip. Fun memory overclocking. But if you are coming from Intel the overclocking performance of the CPU IS going to dissapoint you. Especially if you are someone like me and have your whole system under water. Also. Since day one. Despite all the bios revisions I have had stability problems. Sometimes pretty bad. The new F11 bios seems pretty ok. But just like their GPUs it seems like AMD is always lacking in software support. If I had it to do over I'd get the Intel version of the motherboard with the 10 core intel that's about to shit on everything gaming wise. 5.3 single core boost/4.8 all core. That thing is going to rock games. And on 14nm 1.4v I bet you on custom water people hit 5.4 all core. Maybe more.
2020-02-21 23:37
will u play games only? or streaming+ games? or work? If u will stream/work get Ryzen If u will only play on this PC get 9700 because it is still slightly better for gaming btw wait for new intel gen cuz older gen will get cheaper
2020-02-23 12:44
Just get a ryzen since you don't want to overclock your cpu. 3700x should be fine
2020-02-23 14:49
#225
 | 
Russia NikSmoK 
9700f if no oc. but why would you buy it anyway if you can buy 3700x for cheaper and also cheaper mobos and cooler
2020-02-23 15:32
Rysen is better overall and cheaper. No reason to get Intel up to this point. AMD value is much higher. Although Intel tends to be marginally superior at gaming It's way worst at anything else and costs a lot more.
2020-02-23 15:37
You should get the cheapest one. There are cheaper alternatives from AMD though. I personally own a Ryzen 7 3700X which is much better in CS:GO but worse in just about every other game. Not gonna talk about streaming and video editing and all of the other bullshit. Most people don't do that. TL;DR Get whichever one is the cheapest or save some money and buy a 3700X/3800X.
2020-02-23 15:43
9700f
2020-02-23 15:45
Depends on what you do with your PC. If you only play esports titles like CS then you'll be fine with a cheaper CPU than that. The Ryzen 5 3600 is hard to beat on price / performance atm. I wouldn't be buying any Intel chips on the 14nm architecture tbh; if you must have Intel wait for the 10nm and especially the 7nm.
2020-02-23 15:48
guys please don't buy intel i7 9700k + gtx 1650. Even though intel is faster with rtx 2080 ti, you will get same or better results with like ryzen 5 2600 + gtx 1660 super etc. Really in games you don't need a more than a decent cpu
2020-02-23 15:55
Evil Geniuses
1.33
MIBR
3.44
Dignitas
3.37
Orgless
1.29
Swole Patrol
2.28
MIBR
1.66
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.