Thread has been deleted
Last comment
-RARING 2.0 !?!!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!
s1mple | 
United States GrandNagusZek 
Am I only one who want that useless rating 2.0 away that should be fancy but it is total failure in reality? Guy with 1,28 k/d from game have low 2.0 rating than guy with 0,5 k/d HLTV makers probably think it was smart idea, but really no, it was total failure
2020-04-08 08:11
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
prove it or...
2020-04-08 08:12
kng
2020-04-08 08:12
Yes
2020-04-08 08:12
Because kd is the only thing that matters when you want to measure a players performance in a match
2020-04-08 08:13
Its only thing that actually make any sense and easy to understand rating 2.0 is full of many different things that we don't even see, just unclear uncome and clearly rating 2.0 don't even show who was best on server in 90% of cases its like football would make rating 2.0 instead of showing made goals per season and it would be how fast you run, how many times you got ball, how many shots you did etc.. and then give some random number as outcome, totally pointless maybe its just time to admit rating 2.0 was complete failure?
2020-04-08 10:02
Which player has bigger impact? The guy who flashes for his team, anchors the bombsites, gets the crucial 2 kills and clutches rounds, or the guy who plays for kills, just finishes low hp players, saves alot and goes for eco frags and exit kills?
2020-04-08 10:06
rating 2.0 just doesn't show impact, it say it would, but it doesn't in 90% of cases that is the problem
2020-04-11 08:54
#17
erkaSt | 
Australia An_Ibis 
for your football example, making the goals/assists the only important stat, then all defenders would be deemed to only play bad games. If you play 1v1 on messi and keep him goaless did you really have a bad game? Rating 2.0 basically just uses other stats to show that even though a player didn't get many kills or have a good k/d, he may have still played a good game. Just like the defender who kept messi goalles
2020-04-08 10:12
#18
 | 
Russia xtkjdtr001 
8/8
2020-04-08 10:15
im pretty sure nomad explained it last time someone complained, but i dont wanna go find it
2020-04-08 08:13
#6
 | 
Ukraine FaZntaZiya 
because ADR and KAST are important too
2020-04-08 08:15
This rating is good cos it counts everything (adr, kast, utility usage etc) and also it's made to calculate how impactful this player was, was he just exit fragging or winning rounds instead
2020-04-08 08:16
if it would work, then yes, but it clearly doesn't work it doesn't show who was winning rounds or who was exit fraggit either
2020-04-08 10:04
actually it does. besides dpr, kpr, adr, kast, rating 2.0 also counts impact (stat that show was your multikills/openfrags impactful (led to round win) or not (exit frags, failed clutch-attempts etc)). generally rating 2.0 is just average between these parameters (impact/kd/kpr/adr/dpr/kast + something else they don't display) calculated with formula they never showed. but it works alright and that's all we have to know good example is yesterday's spirit-smash game (where all 3 maps were one sided): hltv.org/matches/2340699/smash-vs-spirit.. look at at grux & magixx on the 1st map. both scored similar 12/14 kd, magixx made even more damage per round (77 vs. 73) and his kast is just 10% worse (65 vs 75) which is not critical. however, grux got 1.14 and magixx has only 0.85. that's because grux with his 12 frags won few rounds for his team and magixx did almost nothing (4-16 scoreline just confirms it). there aren't such accurate examples on the rest of the maps but still u can see the huge gaps of rating 2.0 despite almost similar frag count/adr/kast (neex vs. magixx on 2nd map, grux vs. idisbalance on 3rd map) the main problem of rating 2.0 is lack of "relativity". your 1.40 vs. astralis & your 1.40 vs. some asian mix on local event is the same thing and that's why kaze is top-3 cs:go player of all time according to hltv stats ( hltv.org/stats/players?startDate=all ). but if we set filters and don't make questionable comparisions, rating 2.0 is the best method in cs:go statistics ever
2020-04-08 11:40
rating 2.0 is worst, for example one player can have most kills in game and win rounds that impact who win game and still he can have lower rating 2.0 than other players in his team or enemy team idea is good but in practice it doesn't work how HLTV did it thats why all normal sports use goal system etc, instead of "rating 2.0" where everything would be measured in one number which would include somebody could steal ball, how many times you shoot to goal etc...
2020-04-11 08:30
impact rating>>>>everything
2020-04-08 08:16
doesn't show real impact
2020-04-10 17:35
#9
rain | 
Norway MrSwagFrag 
Hurr durr oNlY kIlLs AnD dEeAtHs MaTtEr
2020-04-08 08:16
#10
 | 
Germany tmp1 
Yeah he talks like your average braindead supreme player
2020-04-08 08:18
"Guy with 1,28 k/d from game have low 2.0 rating than guy with 0,5 k/d" Which match are you referring to? And which players?
2020-04-08 08:18
0 iq
2020-04-08 08:22
Reported for baiting
2020-04-08 08:48
#22
 | 
Latvia IzzoR 
Flag checks out
2020-04-10 17:38
MAD Lions
1.76
Dignitas
2.93
Hard Legion
1.37
FATE
3.00
MAD Lions
1.92
Spirit
1.92
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.