Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Ahmaud Arberys case
Europe brandonroy13 
Why is this so viral / popular , is this some kind of a racist propaganda ? Homicides are happening every day why this one in particular has to be so special?
2020-05-08 14:33
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
#1
ropz | 
Netherlands Sky3rr
''why this one in particular has to be so special?'' this is what I ask myself 9/10 times I read a newsarticle
2020-05-08 14:34
26 replies
#40
 | 
United States notawaffle
This one is special because the police just let the men walk and ignored what happened, despite people reporting him missing. Even when the video came out they still didnt do anything.
2020-05-18 04:19
25 replies
cause it was a lawful killing
2020-05-18 05:17
24 replies
#64
 | 
United States notawaffle
vigilantes are legal where he lived (which is stupid), if they know someone committed a crime, but there is no solid tie between any crime activity to Arbery
2020-05-18 05:55
10 replies
Breaking and entering
2020-05-21 11:51
9 replies
imagine trying to justify the murder of someone who was gunned down by some KKona retards just because he's black, you can't tell me they would shoot a white man in that way lmao
2020-05-21 14:53
6 replies
A white man wouldn't have resisted
2020-05-22 00:42
5 replies
Because he isn't hunted on the streets by police and kkk idiots
2020-05-22 00:44
4 replies
#242
 | 
Cambodia retard2k
imagine believing this myth xaxaxa
2020-05-22 12:23
3 replies
myth that black people are more likely to get shot by police? not a myth, it's fucking reality in that shit country
2020-05-22 18:28
2 replies
#245
 | 
Cambodia retard2k
stop watching cnn
2020-05-22 19:02
Because they commit more crime
2020-05-23 08:28
there's no proof he did that
2020-05-21 14:53
1 reply
Its on video
2020-05-22 00:44
#66
 | 
United States Slyckz
that was murder
2020-05-18 06:04
In no way was it lawful
2020-05-18 11:27
6 replies
self defence
2020-05-21 11:51
5 replies
from what? You chasing an innocent man is you defending from what?
2020-05-21 12:24
4 replies
The chasing was because of him committing a crime, the self defence was when he tried to grab the shotgun
2020-05-21 12:29
3 replies
What crime did he commit?
2020-05-21 13:57
2 replies
Breaking an entering
2020-05-21 14:00
1 reply
To someones apartment? No he walked into an empty construction site, which if you've never met a man is WHAT MEN DO. Furthermore it is not even a crime, even if it was you don't get to commit a citizens arrest unless you see crime happening live which they did not
2020-05-21 14:01
How can you kill a higher "by the law" ? Do you shoot people at the gym also?
2020-05-18 11:56
2 replies
What?
2020-05-21 12:20
1 reply
-higher +Runner/jogger Phone autocorrect fucked me, sorry
2020-05-21 14:47
LOL nice bait
2020-05-23 08:29
1 reply
Truth isn't bait
2020-05-23 08:29
#2
 | 
United Kingdom replicanoob
NA media but still sad(
2020-05-08 14:37
Isn't it obvious? They are pushing their propaganda against white men. Meanwhile anything bad a black man does is massively under-reported or fully hidden.
2020-05-08 14:40
19 replies
the thing is , white men are pushing propaganda against white men who actually makes profit off that could this be an anti-trump propaganda somehow
2020-05-08 14:46
3 replies
1 reply
yeah , i dont see LeChina James posting this on his ig
2020-05-08 14:51
#88
 | 
North America niftynick
You mean (((white))) mens. Its not white guys doing it to other white guys, its the jude mafia in industry
2020-05-18 08:09
#33
 | 
United States Phamous3k
Lol... Bulgaria... Ok buddy. Just read your news articles and have fun.
2020-05-18 03:56
They ambushed and murdered this guy, everyone knew it, and nothing happened for months. That warrants a story no matter what their races were. Just because the perpetrators were white doesn't make it an attack on all white men.
2020-05-18 04:07
12 replies
Ambushed? He was breaking into a property
2020-05-18 05:20
2 replies
0/8. If you seriously believe this you need to reevaluate your life. If he was breaking into property where was the stuff he stole?
2020-05-18 05:23
1 reply
He dropped it? Didn't find anything to steal?
2020-05-21 11:52
he dindu nuffin men(((
2020-05-21 13:06
8 replies
Yes bro he ran 32 km to stuff wooden chips from a construction site into his cargo pant pockets.
2020-05-21 13:07
7 replies
im sure he was a good boy going to church and shiet
2020-05-21 13:09
6 replies
Wooden chips go for a whole 50 cents per pound dude. He could've made a whole nickel on that trip.
2020-05-21 13:11
5 replies
never said he was smart boi 👌😎
2020-05-21 13:14
4 replies
If you're that dumb you probably can't even read street signs. How'd he run 32 km and not get lost?
2020-05-21 13:16
3 replies
maybe he was running away from his fatherly responsibilities
2020-05-21 13:19
2 replies
nt bro. Going out for milk or cigarettes is the excuse there, to a construction site for wooden chips isn't one of them.
2020-05-21 13:21
1 reply
its the journey what matters, not the destination 👌😊
2020-05-21 14:41
meanwhile, 3 cops attacked and killed an innocent wife and charge her bf with try murder cuz he defended himself from cops that are in the wrong house, don't wear any police clothes and never said they are cops when they attacked.
2020-05-18 11:37
who
2020-05-08 15:08
#9
 | 
Denmark Galdun
Just part of the ever increasing anti white narrative .. Danish media hopping on the band wagon calling this a modern day lynching or at the very least not downplaying that patently absurd notion
2020-05-18 02:18
because hes a black guy who was shot as a possible hate crime? shows racism against blacks is still a thing?
2020-05-18 02:23
61 replies
#11
 | 
Denmark Galdun
Blacks murder whites in the states at something like a 10 to 1 ratio.
2020-05-18 02:29
49 replies
source?
2020-05-18 02:30
48 replies
#15
 | 
Denmark Galdun
per capita I should add.. The numbers are available at the bureau of justice website or you can do a bit of number crunching on the fbi statistics although the numbers are no longer tallied up by race as of 2016, wonder why.. either way the notion that the black population in the US is hunted for sport by law enforcement and civilians alike is a farce ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-.. Anyway at the top here you can see the numbers.. with a bit of math and knowing the sizes of each of the two population, this should be a sobering moment for anyone who dares claim that blacks are the poor victims of white racist blablabla.. same week a black guy executed two random old white folks at a cemetary.. no one is jogging for them no one is using this to indict black america as a deeply racist whatever.. because that is not the order of the day.. the order of the day is white people are racist, same as yesterday.. and same tomorrow I don't want to racialize things.. but if the media and society at large has gone off on a complete tangent there is no other way to correct that absolute debacle..
2020-05-18 02:53
47 replies
i never said anything about black people commiting more or less crimes than whites, i said that there is still racism against blacks no matter if they commit a crime, etc. and there are reasons black people could commit more crimes than whites
2020-05-18 02:57
7 replies
#21
 | 
Denmark Galdun
this spits in the face of every mainstream narrative and you know it.. We were not talking about why the numbers are the way they are but whilst we are playing murder apologism, are you going to do the same for whites who kill blacks? like these two, maybe the statistics I just gave you offer a tiny bit of context to why some people might be a tiny bit more apprehensive when it comes to young black men.. other than whites being evil racist scum of course. Or do you not play that game when it comes to whites? if not that's in lockstep with the mainsteam media. The apologia flows in one direction only
2020-05-18 03:15
2 replies
#23
device | 
Denmark 4vs0
ur response was unessesary, u absolutely raped that kid with #15
2020-05-18 03:08
1 reply
raping kids is bad mmmkay
2020-05-18 12:14
#22
device | 
Denmark 4vs0
ur response translates too "i thought i was right, but i was proven wrong, so now I'm going to write some bullshit to try and safe face"
2020-05-18 03:08
3 replies
+1 this dude got absolutely destroyed lol
2020-05-18 03:10
2 replies
you both cant read
2020-05-18 12:14
1 reply
too long iddnt read
2020-05-18 12:45
Did any one of them not get arrested and not face trial?
2020-05-18 04:09
34 replies
#99
 | 
Denmark Galdun
It's weird how you guys can be wrong in so many demonstrable ways, yet still be so self righteous and take it out on those who are not under the same social conditioning forcing you to knee jerk like you are.. how many times do we have to do this?
2020-05-18 11:23
33 replies
It's weird how you guys avoid a yes or no question in so many demonstrable ways, yet still be so self righteous and take it out on those who are not under the same social conditioning forcing you to knee jerk like you are.. how many times do we have to do this?
2020-05-18 11:24
32 replies
#104
 | 
Denmark Galdun
A yes or no question would both imply that they SHOULD have been arrested or SHOULD have faced trial.. neat little trick.. And when I tell you that they HAVE been arrested and WILL face trial you will make a tactical retreat but will of course remember to bring the goal posts with you.. because you are dishonest.. and being dishonest is the only way to turn this into a modern day lynching.. so lying is plenty.. keep at it comrade And because the coditioning is so strong.. when they are found not guilty you will double down on your race baiting.. and so will the media
2020-05-18 11:35
31 replies
This is pure projection. You were being dishonest in the first place, you made a false equivalency between these cases where everyone probably went to trial and jail and Ahmaud's case where that didn't happen. I called you out and now you're crying about it and calling me the liar. Lmao. "And when I tell you that they HAVE been arrested and WILL face trial" Well at least you finally said yes pretty much loser.
2020-05-18 11:37
24 replies
#109
 | 
Denmark Galdun
That would be NO idiot they have been arrested and will face trial.. even if your question kinda gave away that you were already too simple to engage with, you should be able to follow it yourself.. Your dishonesty is palpable, but I gotta admit the pre-emptive projection accusation was brilliant.. But look I am not here to punch down on the ideologically and mentally challenged/deranged.. so run along.
2020-05-18 11:48
23 replies
Question: "Did any one of them not get arrested and not face trial?" Answer: They will be arrested and will face trail Let's not argue semantics here. What I wrote above is what it comes down to. Just accept you got trashed and move on. You haven't even denied you tried to make a false equivalency because you know you did and you basically just admitted to it. And now you're being rude and calling me "challenged". You're clearly a dishonest, rude scumbag bro, just accept you lost this one and move on. No one's reading this anyway.
2020-05-18 11:54
22 replies
#116
 | 
Denmark Galdun
YOU LITERALLY JUST CALLED ME A LOSER.. you are the disease plaguing this discourse personified mate.. The semantics are quite clear.. you made a poorly phrased question that you yourself couldn't even follow or answer without a bunch of caveats. You have nothing.. nothing but a fake sense of virtue
2020-05-18 12:01
21 replies
Because you have a loser mindset you're still demonstrating. I still never went as far as to call you challenged. The point of my original comment was to call out your false equivalency and you basically let it slip that's exactly what you did. You admitted they all probably went to trial. And now you're hiding behind "semantics" as the basis of your entire argument despite admitting you were wrong by mistake. Do you understand why I called you a loser now?
2020-05-18 12:14
18 replies
#130
 | 
Denmark Galdun
I never made a false equivalence.. and your ass is too dishonest. The only way it becomes a false equivalence is if I buy into your notion that it was a special case when my entire point is that the case is not special in the way you claim it is.. it's a media hype job and if you are gonna be outraged atleast be consistently outraged.. You keep trying to get me to inadvertedy sign of on your retarded premises :) it's not gonna work..
2020-05-18 12:19
17 replies
You're comparing cases where everyone went to trial and probably jail to a case where the two perpetrators didn't go to trial for months. That is a false equivalency by definition. You've admitted that these cases went to trial, and we both know Ahmaud's case didn't for months. What is there left to argue? You brought up the cases dude, I didn't make you do it. No one dragged you into any premises, this is your argument. Stop being a loser and take some responsibility. I didn't want to be mean, but just from listening to you you were raised badly dude. No character. Straight up.
2020-05-18 12:25
16 replies
#145
 | 
Denmark Galdun
You haven't made a single point that's valid. Pure bs and shitting on the chess board. You should apply for a job with the Young Turks btw you would fit right in XD
2020-05-18 12:35
15 replies
You've admitted that these cases went to trial, and we both know Ahmaud's case didn't for months. Therefore it's a false equivalence. What is there left to argue? No dude seriously, just address this. Can you?
2020-05-18 12:36
14 replies
#151
 | 
Denmark Galdun
It is going to trial, point adressed.. I don't think you really understand what a false equivalence is.. And My point was never the specifics of this case in particular, more the narratives that are attached. I didn't say that the cases were equivalent.. not in any way. I brought it up to highlight that what the media does and what you perpetuate is to cherry pick 1 case out of 100's when there are other equally outrageous stories. That's what media does right? but it becomes fishy when it is always the same narrative that's being presented.. never the reverse.. and that's exactly what we see.. and it's not because you can't find stories that could just as easily be construed as being black racist murders etc.. they happen quite alot.. wouldn't expect you to care or even know about it if u follow mainsteam media.. And like I said, I don't want this constant racialization of cherry picked crime or not-crime.. but I also don't want media that presents the myth of vast white on black victimization.. whatever context you can present it doesn't explain away that THAT notion is BS in light of a 10 to 1 black on white murder rate, cases that never see the light of day unless you go out of your way to find em.. but you can, and I dare you.
2020-05-18 12:52
13 replies
So 40 comments down, you're now trying to claim you weren't trying to make an equivalence at all. Despite the fact that you brought up other example trails in a thread about a trial. But, you weren't trying to use them as an equivalence or use them as examples at all. I don't even know what to say anymore dude. And I'm not discussing FBI crime stats with you.
2020-05-18 12:57
12 replies
#153
 | 
Denmark Galdun
You wouldn't be able to lay out your point if I asked you to.. An example is not the same as an equivalence.. You never knew what to say, which is why what you have said has been the same shit over and over and it didn't even make sense the first time.
2020-05-18 13:01
11 replies
Okay dude I'll give you the absolute highest benefit of the doubt. Why did you bring up the cases? I'll just ask you straight up. To display FBI Crime Stats which have nothing to do with this particular case?
2020-05-18 13:04
10 replies
#156
 | 
Denmark Galdun
Oh thank you SO much kind sir.. I have the benefit of the doubt of such a mind.. I just explained why I brought up the second case.. it was simply to serve as watermark.. cases like the one I highlighted pass by, completely under the radar all the time. I wanted to illustrate how easy it is to cherry pick cases if you want to play identity politics, so I just picked the most recent and vanilla example, I can find you more juicy ones but I have a feeling you don't give a shit.. Because it is not about the 1 case You are right they haven't got much to do with this particular case, and I already explained to you that I am not super interested in the specifics of this case.. This case is pretty boring tbh. but the reactions are not. I am interested in the narratives that are attached. And the stats ARE a point of relevance if you are trying to debunk the myth that blacks are the eternal victims of vast wide white victimization that the media and various institutions seem eager to present as the unequivocal truth.
2020-05-18 13:31
9 replies
"I highlighted pass by, completely under the radar all the time." You really don't learn do you. We just went back and forth for about 40 comments explaining why the cases can't be compared. They went under the radar because they went to a fair trial dude. These cases aren't equivalent or comparable, so this one got attention and the ones you mentioned did not for a valid reason. You're seriously a lost cause.
2020-05-18 13:40
8 replies
#159
 | 
Denmark Galdun
1stly. They absolutely CAN BE COMPARED.. they can't be equated, learn to speak your own language for heaven's sake.. You can compare things that are vastly different, imbecile.. You can even compare things that are polar opposites.. 2ndly. I am still not talking about the one case, the one case was an example of stuff that just sails by and doesn't register. How thick headed are you? I am talkng about the media and societal narrative trends, for the billionth time. And an implication of your retarded defence is that the media always waits for arrests, verdicts etc. before weighing in and labeling it the hate crime of the century etc ? You have a huge throbbing confirmation bias.. and the curators of what is put in front of you are culpable or equally unaware it seems
2020-05-18 14:03
7 replies
Dude you're just an idiot straight up. I've spent all this time carefully explaining why they weren't comparable, and I thought you at the very least got that. But, even that was too high of an expectation for you.
2020-05-18 14:28
6 replies
#168
 | 
Denmark Galdun
You don't respond to any actual points.. you only go around in circles around a non-point you made.. People can see it dude.. You lost.. and you never had a chance to begin with so don't feel too bad
2020-05-18 14:30
5 replies
Dude replying with walls of gibberish, then insisting I lost... lmao. "People can see it dude" And you just proved you're stupid. Who is looking at this dude? Who?
2020-05-18 14:32
4 replies
#170
 | 
Denmark Galdun
Alot of things seem like gibberish to an imbecile.. 'Straight up' XD
2020-05-18 14:35
3 replies
No dude, your command of English is just weak. It's hard to read what you're saying. Combine that with the fact that you're stupid and your thoughts are incoherent. You have a recipe for something that's painful to read.
2020-05-18 14:36
2 replies
#175
 | 
Denmark Galdun
You lose, I win. If coherence were dertermined by what you are able to follow, very few things would be coherent.
2020-05-18 14:44
1 reply
Lol. "You lose. I win" Dude you're so immature. Why did I waste all this time talking to you?
2020-05-18 20:24
youre trying way too hard to use fancy words and its super cringe
2020-05-18 12:14
1 reply
Dude he pretty much admitted he was wrong by mistake so this is his tactic now. lmao.
2020-05-18 12:17
well of course people will double down on racism accusations if 2 white men are found not guilty of murder when there is video of them shooting a black guy in cold blood in broad daylight. youd have to be a special type of person (a racist idiot like you) to do anything else.
2020-05-18 12:17
5 replies
#134
 | 
Denmark Galdun
He literally makes a 90 degree turn, charges at an armed man, gun lowered, starts throwing punches and yanks at the firearm.. You wouldn't even be able to make the case the he didn't shoot him by mistake.. I can't even understand how you would come to the conclusions you have reached..
2020-05-18 12:24
4 replies
well see if you are a black man walking through a white neighbourhood and 2 white guys come at you with guns drawn before speaking a word, then its a life or death situation. of course he went at them. he didnt have a gun and they were going to kill him.
2020-05-18 12:26
if their intention wasnt to kill the guy on purpose they would confront him and tell him they are armed, not come at him with weapons drawn. the intent is clear.
2020-05-18 12:26
2 replies
#141
 | 
Denmark Galdun
You are too uninformed.. intent to kill implies.... intent.... so 'on purpose' is redundant.. Oh so you get to assume intent now.. great.. well I am not shocked.. You are stupid, self righteous, uninformed.. the holy trifecta.. Bye
2020-05-18 12:29
1 reply
send more dots please we have a shortage here
2020-05-18 12:30
blacks kill a lot more blacks than they kill whites and whites kill more whites than black. so most murders in USA are not racially motivated. this also clearly shows in those stats you looked at, so you didnt mention it on purpose, because you are barely smart enough to realize it would invalidate your whole reasoning nt i r8 2/8
2020-05-18 12:13
3 replies
#139
 | 
Denmark Galdun
oh god... Whites kill more whites.... I ONLY BROUGHT IT UP BECAUSE WE ARE DISCUSSING THE SOCIETAL ASSAULT ON THE BLACK MAN BY EVERYONE AND THEIR MOTHER......... Is that beyond your mental capacity? I never said most murders were racially motivated.. YOU are the one who has bought into the notion that THIS was and THIS case is super special and a hate crime because white.. If you are gonna argue all of the things I didn't mention this is gonna be a long discussion..
2020-05-18 12:28
2 replies
your argument was that blacks murder so many more white people that its extreme, while the truth is that compared to same-race killings the amount of black ppl killing white and other way around are basically statistically irrelevant.
2020-05-18 12:29
this case is special because a man was murdered in broad daylight, there is video of it, and police didnt do anything for months because the victim was black.
2020-05-18 12:30
Except the evidence shows the opposite? Try again.
2020-05-18 02:51
10 replies
ok, racism is non existant towards anyone happy now?
2020-05-18 03:01
9 replies
Nice straw man.
2020-05-18 03:02
#24
device | 
Denmark 4vs0
try this racism still exists, however the media chooses to focus on racism against blacks while blacks are committing the most crimes and playing the victim card the hardest all non white and non black races like asians for example, commit the least amount of crimes, face plenty of racism themselves, yet the media doesnt cover that at all
2020-05-18 03:10
7 replies
#27
 | 
Yugoslavia RIP_MY_NIP
the issue of racism still persists in the US, may it be black on white or white on black, so I agree, but the high crime rates from black people mostly come against other black people, which is most commonly attributed to their socio-economic status that comes from having a poorer (in the sense of wealth) upbringing than people of other colours.
2020-05-18 03:16
im not going to bother whenever i post one thing i get 5 replies saying im wrong
2020-05-18 03:14
5 replies
Maybe because you are wrong
2020-05-18 11:49
4 replies
maybe because some people just cant have a conversation without accusing and attacking someone
2020-05-19 01:06
3 replies
you get attacked because you are wrong 👌😎
2020-05-21 13:08
2 replies
+1
2020-05-22 00:52
2020-05-22 00:59
#13
 | 
Yugoslavia RIP_MY_NIP
he was guy that was jogging and got hunted down by 2 guys who killed him cause they "thought" he was a robber. The two perpetrators weren't arrested for like 2 months until the video of arberys's death got viral and people started asking questions. people arguing that he deserved it can go to hell. two civilians taking matters into their own hands on a presumption that a jogger may be a robber is disgusting and shows that racism is still a very wide issue in the US. The fact that they weren't arrested as well shows the hypocrisy of the police, which would've very gladly taken in two black people had they been the perpetrators.
2020-05-18 02:31
15 replies
+1
2020-05-18 02:32
#16
 | 
Denmark Galdun
liar or sheep, so which is it?
2020-05-18 02:48
5 replies
#29
 | 
Yugoslavia RIP_MY_NIP
I understand your point #15 but if you would look at the how much effort the police but into capturing or killing the man who shot 2 at the cemetery versus not even attempting to arrest the two men who had shot Arbery after the incident you can see why people are so outraged. There is a still a lot of racism in the US; the fact that I've seen multiple people justify the killing of Arbery because of: a. he may have been a robber (nothing was proven) b. he was resisting two civilians chasing him with guns ("he should've just surrendered himself to 2 people who aren't the police and are pointing guns at him, if he was innocent why did he try to run, etc.") c. he had a small crimimal record, he definitely would've done worse in the future d. he was running in a neighbourhood, he should've expected that people would be suspicious (extremely stupid point, he was wearing a jogging outfit) I am not saying that black people are being hunted down around the US, but what I am saying is that because of the fact that two men decided that it was in their interest to hunt down a black man who they were suspicious of, instead of leaving it to the police, the police being extremely incompetent when it came to arresting perpetrators in an obvious case of pre-meditated murder - no, chasing someone down with a gun and then expecting them to do nothing is not self-defense, it's pre-meditated murder - and the fact that people on the internet from the US are justifying it are all clear indicators that the US still has a rampant problem with racism. My point does not invalidate yours, it simply adds on to it - black people being racist to white people is just as bad as vice-versa - and I believe that this issue is a lot more fundamental than people would like to admit. The police is probably still the worst offender when it comes down to shooting innocent people, simply because of both incompetence, a lust for violence and as previously mentioned, racism.
2020-05-18 03:16
4 replies
#32
 | 
Denmark Galdun
I could say a whole lot about the things I believe you are wrong about and they are many.. but it's getting late. Might give a proper response tomorrow provided the thread hasn't been yeeted into oblivion for ever..
2020-05-18 03:26
3 replies
#34
 | 
Yugoslavia RIP_MY_NIP
Alright, see you tomorrow.
2020-05-18 04:02
2 replies
he wont respond lol
2020-05-18 12:11
1 reply
He got proved wrong that's why haha
2020-05-21 13:34
they didnt kill him because they thought he robbed the place they killed him because he refused citizens arrest(whatever the fuck you call it, it's legal in Georgia) and lunged at one of the dudes and grabbed a hold of his rifle/shotgun, trigger got pulled, jogger got killed.
2020-05-18 05:34
7 replies
#58
 | 
Yugoslavia RIP_MY_NIP
"Citizens arrest" - are you brain dead? He didn't commit a crime, the two men weren't active police officers and they threatened him with guns. How can you justify that?
2020-05-18 05:37
6 replies
2020-05-18 05:46
1 reply
#81
 | 
Yugoslavia RIP_MY_NIP
I just looked it up and it seems you are right, I am really sorry for the insult. However, the McMichaels were still not justified to kill Arbery, even under the law of self-defence. This is because in the state of Georgia, the initial aggressor cannot claim self-defense when the person they aggressed upon retaliates: "There are three situations in which a person is not justified in using force (I will only list this one): If he initially provokes the use of force against himself with the intent to use such force as an excuse to inflict bodily harm upon the assailant". The McMichaels attempted to arrest Arbery while openly carrying guns, and while both is legal in Georgia, Arbery is also entitled to self-defence. As he was not the aggressor in the situation - the McMichaels had their guns out when Ahmaud Arbery came jogging towards them - it is clear that they were willing to use deadly force even before Arbery had done anything that would've warranted them to do so. Citizens arrest using deadly force can only be justified if the arrester was practicing self-defence or was trying to prevent a further more serious felony from being committed, but because they had already pulled out their guns before Arbery had done either (attack them or commit a felony) it shows that they were the aggressors in this scenario, and not Arbery, which is why the case for self-defence isn't viable.
2020-05-18 07:54
hello? pls respond
2020-05-18 06:10
3 replies
"reasonable and proper grounds of suspicion." Jogging around your neighborhood is not "reasonable and proper grounds of suspicion."
2020-05-18 07:25
2 replies
1. this was not the first time he arose suspicion in their neighbourhood 2. he was not jogging until he left the house under construction 3. one of the neighbours called 911 once they saw him enter ye ok mate, jog along now
2020-05-18 07:44
1 reply
Wrong, prove it. That's not the information that was made public.
2020-05-18 07:52
#26
 | 
Yugoslavia RIP_MY_NIP
this was a hate-crime, but it doesn't invalidate hate-crimes committed by black people on white people, it just adds more to the tally of racism in the US
2020-05-18 03:18
5 replies
Someone being killed *because* of their race is a hate crime... someone being killed *in spite* of their race is not. There is a significant difference. Ahmaud was killed *because* he was black. Saying that generic black people kill generic white people on a daily basis as a counter to that is irrelevant if they’re killed for a robbery or similar. That is a logical function of a predominantly lower social class killing people of a predominantly higher social class, which is prevalent in every country regardless of race.
2020-05-18 05:15
4 replies
#54
 | 
Yugoslavia RIP_MY_NIP
Oh yea my bad. The way I wrote that makes me sound like I'm trying to be a centrist on the situation when I'm really not. I was planning to write it together with my other response, which gives more context to it, but I couldn't edit anymore, and I also forgot to add it to the original thread.
2020-05-18 05:30
#96
 | 
Denmark Galdun
Lot of assumptions smuggled into the most hand waving statement i've seen in a while.. but it's all par for the course.. we know the defense mechanism at play in that slanted world of yours.. oooh and I love the little class analysis at the end there.. absolute garbage mate..
2020-05-18 11:09
2 replies
The irony of this coming from the most defensive person on the thread is too funny. How hurt are you?
2020-05-18 12:10
Do feel free to point out which parts were “assumptions” though, so that you can embarrass yourself even further after calling the situation anti-white propaganda. The self-pity and inherent guilt are palpable. Lmao.
2020-05-18 12:25
#36
 | 
United States Phamous3k
Racial tensions can be high in the states, and a lot of this new racism kind of appeared during Trump's campaign. Weird, cause Trump is more about class/status/$$$ then if you're black or mexican... But anyways, lot's of racial issues since FOREVER and with social media, and the internet in general a lot has been exposed. Think Trayvon Martin, Tamir Rice, Eric Garner, etc. etc. If you in fucking Russia (or just any random country outside NA) you'll only see what the media shows you... But living here there's reasons why things go viral, or get protested etc... America got it's fair share of problems... One reason could be the minority population growing exponentially and some of the old guard trying to hold on there power... 2045-2050 is when supposedly whites will be a minority in America.
2020-05-18 04:08
6 replies
Every single example you listed happened under Obama but OK.
2020-05-18 04:15
1 reply
#42
 | 
United States Phamous3k
Read where I say " lot's of racial issues since FOREVER" lol... I said new RACISM... Think MAGA hats, and college kids holding tiki torches on campus. I just gave random example of this FOREVER racism... Pick annnnnnny president you want though lol. However; if you want me to look up racist shit during Trump's presidency thats a very easy google...
2020-05-18 04:29
Tbh neo-Conservatives are the most retarded people I've ever met. They're extremely concerned about white people becoming a minority, but will just lash out instead of trying to improve their birth rate. White dudes are afraid of getting married because of all the horror stories of someone they knew going homeless because he got taken to the cleaners. Honestly if they just fixed the marriage laws, tons of white dudes would start committing and white people would never become the minority.
2020-05-18 04:15
3 replies
Sorry, I did not understand what you described as „taken to the cleaners“ can u explain please why is a marriage law potential problematic. Thx dude I really wanna know
2020-05-18 14:35
2 replies
It's mostly an American thing. Basically it's slang for when your ex-wife takes pretty much everything in the divorce settlement.
2020-05-18 14:37
1 reply
Thank you! In germany we have a law that basicly divides everything you earned and gained during the marriage 50/50 (but nothing is touched by the law what you have owned before marriage, so she or he has no right on this) unless there is a special contract you may did before the wedding. I can understand if you do not want to marry if you risk everything but also search a good wife you can trust.
2020-05-18 15:31
he got what he deserved
2020-05-18 04:21
23 replies
why? what he did to deserve?
2020-05-18 04:41
22 replies
robbery
2020-05-18 04:59
21 replies
he didn't take anything tho. people go into houses being constructed all the time not to rob, just out of curiosity. no one can say why he went into the house bc he is dead, you cant just assume he went there to rob it with no solid evidence to back it up.
2020-05-18 05:15
20 replies
why did he casually walk IN the house why did he sprint OUT of the house?
2020-05-18 05:29
19 replies
for the walking in part just read what i wrote for the sprinting out i go back to what i said you cant say he was robbing without proof. he could have gotten spooked so ran out anyone would have done that if they knew they should not be there. no crime was committed. he did not break in and enter it would only have been trespassing i think by the states law if there were signs or gates on the home which there were not or he was told by owner to not go there which he wasn't. you cant just assume things the application of law is based off facts not feelings
2020-05-18 05:49
6 replies
"probable grounds of suspicion" is enough to perform arrest by private person. i.imgur.com/9PYFS37.png he refused arrest by private person AND he attacked a dude pointing a gun at him. just like you said, the white dude GOT SPOOKED and pulled the trigger, they dindu nuffin wrong
2020-05-18 05:53
5 replies
why did arbery not wait for police to arrive if he did nothing wrong. would've been a nice "fuck you" to the white dudes to prove them wrong. you think he would have been executed there on the spot? :D:D:D:D
2020-05-18 05:57
1 reply
ok if i ever walk into a firing squad ill just wait for police :DDDDDDD (ffs max replies annoying)
2020-05-18 06:21
if they suspected him of committing a robbery how are they gonna explain their suspicion. he ran out of the house empty handed so they cannot prove it. he showed up infront of them empty handed so how are they to prove it. it not like they caught him walking down the street with stuff from the house and put two and two together.the only suspicion they could of had is that he was the guy who went in and out of the property. and as for him attacking the guy with a gun that was simply self defence he couldn't run from the guy imagine what it was like from his pov waking down the street only to walk into a firing squad now lets be honest if he knew he was in the wrong he would not have faught one bc he could tell he was being detained but no all he sees is two men with guns and nowhere to go and two it suicide there are two men with guns not just one
2020-05-18 06:13
2 replies
"the only suspicion they could of had is that he was the guy who went in and out of the property." that + this was not the first time they had seen arbery in the neighbourhood being suspect. that is enough to perform Arrest by private person. " as for him attacking the guy pointing a gun at him that was simply self defence" the same thing could be said about the guy who shot arbery, it was out of self defense. "now lets be honest if he knew he was in the wrong he would not have faught one bc he could tell he was being detained but no all he sees is two men with guns" i dont get this.. are you saying he started fighting because he knew he was in the right?
2020-05-18 06:22
1 reply
seeing a "suspicious" (aka black) person in your neighbourhood a couple times, is in fact not enough of a cause to arrest them. they would have to be an immediate threat to the guys who shot him or they would have to have reasonable assumption that he was a threat to someone else nearby. youre not allowed to just arrest ppl for trespassing. only the police are allowed to do that. if you see someone breaking into a house, call the police. dont shoot them. fucking muricans lmao
2020-05-18 12:21
Stop being retarded. I live in the USA, if a house is being under construction, people go and check it out all the time... it's normal.
2020-05-18 07:32
11 replies
"I live in the USA" i can tell by your reading comprehension
2020-05-18 07:47
9 replies
Great counter-argument
2020-05-18 07:51
8 replies
what is there to counter-argue if you never countered my initial argument? stop eating so much burger your brain is clogged
2020-05-18 07:54
7 replies
Your original argument is not based off fact, it's based off your distrust of the media. You don't have any evidence to support it.
2020-05-18 07:56
6 replies
there's a video of arbery casually strolling into the house followed by: arbery sprinting (definitely not jogging pace) out of the house
2020-05-18 08:02
5 replies
Show me the video, I can easily explain it.
2020-05-18 08:03
4 replies
you obviously care so much about the actual truth that you can not even come up with the 4 search words to find what you are looking for, it would literally take you less than 30 seconds. have a nice week, don't forget to breathe
2020-05-18 08:11
3 replies
I have already seen the video, I just asked you for the video you have seen which tells the story in the way that you seem to be so adamant about that I cannot seem to find.
2020-05-18 08:13
Also to prove your retarded ass wrong, here is a video showing multiple people doing the exact same thing he was doing but they weren't killed. youtube.com/watch?v=3XbF7-Hk7hc
2020-05-18 08:14
Yeah i hope china either gets nuked because of corona or all die because of corona both would be likeable
2020-05-18 12:01
Well yea, the security cameras from the house under construction show multiple people going in and out.
2020-05-18 08:08
Imagine being white and crying about racism towards white people.
2020-05-18 05:19
2 replies
Didn’t you know that calling a racist a racist is racism?
2020-05-18 05:28
#162
 | 
Denmark Galdun
Yea, imagine that. Now imagine being white and crying about only racism towards black people, or the white racism that exists in the aether and is coming to get black children, imagine if narratives had the power to control vast swathes of people into supporting certain ideas... I'll go get my tinfoil hat sorry.. CRAZY TALK ! GAY FROGS GAY FROGS ! Illuminati ! LIZARD PEOPLE !
2020-05-18 14:26
#55
tarik | 
Canada ZHF
I think what made this one so special is because he was murdered like two months ago and there was nothing being done about it
2020-05-18 05:32
1 reply
#167
 | 
Denmark Galdun
Good thing the rabble has its unbiased thumbs on the scales now :D
2020-05-18 14:28
Because it took so long for authorities to do anything.
2020-05-18 05:33
The murder charge will probably be dropped within a few months and they will get out of jail. The white dudes did everything lawfully.
2020-05-18 06:52
#73
 | 
Norway Trip^^
Yes is racista proganda yes:000
2020-05-18 07:02
#93
 | 
Austria mo_bamba
wtf new weapon skin case?
2020-05-18 08:22
2 replies
Mo Bamba getting traded?
2020-05-22 00:56
1 reply
#238
 | 
Austria mo_bamba
no mo bamba second best orlando magic center of all time 1.glen davis 2.mo bamba
2020-05-22 11:38
bruh all th people here want to be opressed so bad just bc ur a white, straight male doesn't mean ur life gets better, it means it doesn't get worse unlike poc, women, or the lgbtq+ community
2020-05-18 08:41
2 replies
racist people kills guy because of his race ''well we white people experience racism everyday too NT libtard''
2020-05-18 11:10
1 reply
hhahaha its how it be man
2020-05-20 09:48
It fits the narrative and also it was kinda big deal because the criminals are yet to be prosecuted
2020-05-18 11:27
is this a new case ? any interesting skins ?
2020-05-18 11:44
Have I missed something? What is this all about?
2020-05-18 11:57
1 reply
Its better if u just leave it be... Trust me.
2020-05-18 12:09
Armed robbery?
2020-05-18 11:59
He wasnt jogging even though everyone claims he did, and he did not jogg as we can see from cctv cameras, and about the shooting, well he clearly ran aggressively towards the shooter (the guy shot him when he was less than 2meters away) so idk...
2020-05-18 12:10
14 replies
Most fucked up thing is that the guy whose cctv it was and the guy that recorded the shooting are being harrassed... also who the fuck "visits" someone elses propertly many times in many different nights...
2020-05-18 12:07
13 replies
how the fuck does any of that excuse the fact that they shot a guy for trespassing lmao
2020-05-18 12:23
12 replies
Lmao Ahmaud ran at them agressively... They yelled to him stop and this is citizen arrest, after that Ahmaud ran at them... Lmaoooo go through evidence before being a dick to me lmaooooo....
2020-05-18 13:28
11 replies
if you walk up to someone with a drawn gun, yell at him to stop, and he doesnt, that is not a reason to shoot him lmao. please go read up on how self defense and citizens arrest works. lmao lmao lmao lmao
2020-05-18 13:32
10 replies
If someone yells to you stop and aims a gun at you, is your first reaction A) wait B) run away or C) run agressively towards the guy aiming at you lmaooooo common sense, looks like u dont have any lmao lmao lmao lmao
2020-05-18 14:20
9 replies
youre missing the point that there was no cause to shoot the man, nt blaming the victim
2020-05-18 14:21
8 replies
You have clearly not researched this topic... There has been burglaries in that neighbourhood, those guys that shot him have had their gun stolen in one of those burglaries, a guy trespasses properties many nights in a row sneaking/inspecting houses as we can see from cctv... Because of that, they might have though that he was the guy that stole their gun leading into a shooting after agressive behaviour by the guy that got shot... Nt not reading the whole story... Also why are the guy that gave his cctv camera foorage to police being harassed? And why is the guy that filmed the shooting being harassed? Oh wait always side with "victim" crowd like you are doing that... Also you cant say victim because the case is not closed... Now i can say lmao lmao lmao lmao lmao lmao research bitch lmao lmao
2020-05-18 14:27
7 replies
things being stolen in your neighbourhood is also not a good reason to shoot people
2020-05-18 14:27
maybe if they just reported it to police and handed over the cctv tapes and reported their missing gun instead of taking matters into their own hands the narrative would have been different
2020-05-18 14:28
5 replies
That is true, but the shooter was ex-cop so idk mby he wanted to show his son how to make a citizen arrest, and that went horribly wrong im afraid. Welp, new evidence is gonna come out at some point so idk why are people demonstrading now before seeing the court ruling... And why are they not demonstrading against for example: lousiana memorial service shooting that left 13 people injured by a drive by shooting.
2020-05-18 14:41
4 replies
>but the shooter was ex-cop well color me surprised. NOT.
2020-05-18 14:43
3 replies
Can we agree that the court ruling must be needed before definitive conclution in hltv comment section lol xD why do i believe that hltv forums are definetly better than reddit
2020-05-18 15:07
2 replies
no not really. if there is video of 2 men literally shooting a guy with no cause in broad daylight when he wasnt armed i dont need to wait for courts, because i have 2 functioning eyes and a brain
2020-05-18 15:10
1 reply
Only one shot at him, other one (ex-cop adult son) just watched from few meters in car.
2020-05-18 15:23
i can't handle it, people defending a homicide...
2020-05-21 12:29
2 replies
They're dangerously delusional. If a black father and son did this, and didn't get arrested they'd be saying the West hates white people or something stupid like that. Ironically when the other side says America hates black people, these morons start foaming at the mouth. American politics is built on hypocrisy.
2020-05-21 13:40
1 reply
well said
2020-05-21 13:42
#193
 | 
Europe skrekc
respect dindun 😥 ☝🏿
2020-05-21 12:31
I promise "propaganda against white guys" is not the reason you nerds can't get laid.
2020-05-21 13:19
3 replies
Bro people who actually think that are beyond delusional. White dudes have it the easiest by far from personal experience and seeing how other races of men do with women.
2020-05-21 13:36
2 replies
+1 mad leftys way of calling people who dont agree with him "dumb virgins"
2020-05-21 14:43
1 reply
Did you even read his comment you spazz?
2020-05-21 16:05
as soon as he attacked somebody holding a gun and tried to pry it away from them he signed his own death warrant, anything else is irrelevant
2020-05-21 14:59
1 reply
#260
 | 
Argentina nokkiii
+1 duterte
2020-05-23 10:07
I too like to go jogging through other people's property and charging people that have guns XD
2020-05-22 01:00
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.