Thread has been deleted
Last comment
bo5 1-0 map advantage?
 | 
Russia cuba_libre10 
the worst invention of man kind? so fucking stupid. Been saying this for years. Its bad for the viewers and the sport
2020-05-17 22:38
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
+111111111111111
2020-05-17 22:38
1 reply
#55
 | 
Sweden wtf_men
+1 on +1
2020-05-18 11:36
#2
 | 
France NMLVirush
+1
2020-05-17 22:39
11 replies
#4
 | 
France NMLVirush
flair checks out
2020-05-17 22:39
No, I agree as well - should start on even terms - Astralis would probably have won anyway, and the match would have been more excisting
2020-05-17 22:42
9 replies
#23
vsm | 
France NTd0G
Finally an Astralis fan with a brain, ty bro +1 btw
2020-05-17 23:27
2 replies
Ty for compliment :) Much <3 to G2 and french cs - it's always a joy to watch all your skilled players
2020-05-18 01:23
1 reply
#54
vsm | 
France NTd0G
<33, You love to watch our skilled players choking every match XD. I'm joking ofc, I like danish CS as well, skilled players and lot of good tier 2 teams
2020-05-18 11:33
That is stupid they play well all through elim stage and g2 lose but they should be on even ground sureeeeee
2020-05-17 23:35
5 replies
So they move through faster than G2 - anyway the match lasted 1.5 hours including breaks. That's really hardly final-worthy, is it?
2020-05-18 00:48
2 replies
Dont care pretty much every other esport has the equivalent or something "worse" The team from winners deserves a 1 map advantage no matter what
2020-05-18 01:20
1 reply
ok - I respect your opinion even though we don't agree about this :)
2020-05-18 01:25
#36
 | 
Czech Republic Rewask
A final should be on equal terms, yes. G2 had to beat FaZe already while Astralis had a day off.
2020-05-18 00:49
1 reply
In all honesty the tournament should of been over with astralis vs faze
2020-05-18 01:21
Has there ever been an entertaining final with this kind of a system?
2020-05-17 22:39
2 replies
#40
 | 
France Tytane
Yep, IEM Sydney 2019 qualifier BIG vs G2 BIG 1 map adventage and they 2-0 / 3-0 G2 liquipedia.net/counterstrike/Intel_Extre..
2020-05-18 01:24
1 reply
#57
 | 
Lithuania arres
>qualifier >entertaining You know you can pick only one
2020-05-18 11:38
#5
 | 
Nepal Aguminok
astralis wouldve 3-0 either way but yes 100% agreed
2020-05-17 22:39
3 replies
who cares about, we dont know what would've happened on train, we cant know that
2020-05-17 22:40
2 replies
#10
 | 
Nepal Aguminok
just by looking at first 2 maps you can tell its not about what map is being played, its just players not able to do anything
2020-05-17 22:42
train is one of astralis' best maps but yeah wouldve liked to see it play out
2020-05-17 23:27
yeah, don't think anyone has ever been able to come back from it tbh I feel like even a 1-0 advantage in a bo3 would somehow be less retarded
2020-05-17 22:40
8 replies
#11
 | 
Nepal Aguminok
why not 1-0 advantage in bo1
2020-05-17 22:42
4 replies
15-0 advantage in a bo1 just for the lulz
2020-05-17 22:43
3 replies
#14
 | 
Nepal Aguminok
i mean ive seen comebacks from that score already but still dumb 10-0 would be funny like astralis vs some tier2 team with 10 rounds for that team
2020-05-17 22:47
2 replies
#24
 | 
Poland dreamShow
give them 11 so if they lucky and win the pistol round they'd be up 14-0 but still lose the game 14-16 lol
2020-05-17 23:29
1 reply
#28
 | 
Turkey GOATVICE
KEKW
2020-05-17 23:32
2 replies
holy shit on bo7s I can kinda get behind it, you're playing so many maps no one really cares tbh imagine major finals being bo7 so you gotta play the whole pool to show who's the better team
2020-05-18 00:47
1 reply
+123456789
2020-05-17 22:40
Bad system to apply in CSGO tbf
2020-05-17 22:41
#15
 | 
Russia MeowZer
-99999999999999999999999999999999999999 very fair system
2020-05-17 22:51
I think It is not a problem bcz both of teams bans 1 map. So winner must win 3 maps of 5. But now upper bracked team must 2 but other team must 3. So this is deserved
2020-05-17 22:58
#18
 | 
Georgia Xeeh
Astralis came from the upper bracket in a double elimination format, never losing a single time. G2 lost. The only other fair way is to make G2 have to beat them twice in a row to be the winner..
2020-05-17 23:20
+1 it sucks for viewing. Who needs an advantage when you are just playing for 100 RTR points anyway? so dumb
2020-05-17 23:23
Still poor performance, even bo11 would of been ez 6-0
2020-05-17 23:25
Yeah
2020-05-17 23:25
they used to do that for bo3
2020-05-17 23:31
#26
 | 
Turkey GOATVICE
But why you all cry? 7-0 for Astralis lol
2020-05-17 23:31
#27
 | 
Germany Shackrag
its an act of mercy that g2 only got destroyed on 2 maps instead of 3
2020-05-17 23:32
Should of just been the one map advantage no need for veto superiority as well
2020-05-17 23:36
yes fuck that, been saying that for years as well
2020-05-17 23:39
#42
 | 
Portugal tioNik
I would say that the team coming from the upperbracket should have an advantage like picking the first 2 maps or maybe choosing every side they start on the finals' maps. In the NBA, the teams that play better in the regular season only win homecourt advantage and it is totally fair. It is a BO7 series and they don't get no free game wins. They win homecourt advantage and that's what should happen in CS. Side choosing for all of the maps or most of them. Would be totally fair and it would still deliver exciting finals.
2020-05-18 01:28
1 reply
I do not agree. The advantage of being able to play on your own basketball court is different, in CS, your team will be able to choose two maps on which your team is much more used to playing than the other, this includes strategies and tricks. In basketball, generally, the only really noticeable advantage is support for the home team and, perhaps, the custom with the scenario, but the court is the same, the ball is the same, etc. This is not the same for CS.
2020-05-18 02:13
#43
 | 
Germany Enlay
+11111
2020-05-18 01:29
Personally I like it, it means that the team coming from the losers bracket has to earn it.
2020-05-18 01:29
#45
 | 
United States raymoney
God I hate brainless Astralis fan gays. #30 Astralis | United States TheBlackSwordsman Should of just been the one map advantage no need for veto superiority as well losing brain cells. Should have beeen a fair final.
2020-05-18 01:30
bo4 sucks ass for sure.
2020-05-18 01:30
In my opinion, I think it would be fair that way: As Astralis beat all the teams in the playoffs and everyone had a second chance at the lower bracket, the final could be Bo3, with no advantage for either team. In case Astralis loses, they have a second chance against the G2 in a Bo5 (no advantage map for either team). What do you think?
2020-05-18 01:53
4 replies
#56
 | 
Denmark Derige
So you want the match to be 12 hours long? WTF
2020-05-18 11:38
2 replies
wtf bro? It does not necessarily have to be one followed by the other, in the case of another decision, it is postponed to the next day
2020-05-18 19:47
1 reply
#63
 | 
Denmark Derige
Not an option for big lan tournaments. You dont pay to rent an arena and get a crowd for a day that you maybe dont need
2020-05-19 09:15
so you say G2 must beat astralis 2 times and astralis should beat them only once this system says, G2 must beat astralis on 3 maps astralis must beat G2 on 2 maps only when you think you are so smart and you are using the same logic besides that playing 2 series sucks, shit stratbook on 2nd series
2020-05-19 09:26
in this system it should be like this but its a bad system
2020-05-18 02:01
"the worst invention of man kind?" Nah that's the loser bracket.
2020-05-18 02:05
#51
 | 
France LorisDF
defo up there as one of the worst
2020-05-18 02:07
+1 Remove BO5 altogether. Its always one-sided, teams trying quite after the second map
2020-05-18 02:16
+1
2020-05-18 19:49
#60
 | 
Asia loveall
upper bracket team should have advantage but 1 map advantage is bit too much
2020-05-18 19:54
2 replies
maybe they pick side of all 5 maps themselves. Maybe they ban two maps themselves and then all others are played.
2020-05-19 09:18
1 reply
#68
 | 
Asia loveall
yes that is better.
2020-05-19 09:50
True. Astralis played like one or two games less than G2. That should be enough as the award of sticking in the upper bracket.
2020-05-18 20:08
+1 man everytime I watch such game, the team with 1-0 advantage wins 3-0 easily. Other team neither tries neither has a chance.
2020-05-19 09:17
No it isn't a bad invention a possible solution is normal knockout playoffs with no brackets (which isn't that good here because they need to rank every team) It's actually possible by introducing matches for losers where they compete for rankings instead of giving them 2nd chance like let's say quarter final : 8 teams 4 to semi play for 1-4 ranks 4 eliminated from the run and play for 5-8 ranks If you are going to implement a bracket system, the upper bracket team must have an advantage I don't think of many possibilities except giving him a free pick before bans which is stupid because the team picks opponent perma-ban gg ez, just save time and give the team 1-0
2020-05-19 09:23
4glory
2.13
lvlUP
1.67
Apeks
7.01
AGF
1.10
New England Whalers
1.25
Mythic
3.74
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.