Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Churchill statue defaced!
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Statue of Churchill was defaced in london by vandals :( cant believe this shit!
2020-06-06 17:17
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
#1
 | 
Russia nobody_cars 
Vandals must be sent to Gulag
2020-06-06 17:18
+1 there should be a special kind of prison to put all of those "peacefull" protesters
2020-06-06 17:22
+1
2020-06-06 19:20
#8
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
+1
2020-06-06 17:26
#12
 | 
Slovenia ViaNNA 
+1
2020-06-06 17:28
#149
 | 
Germany colddemon 
Yes, they should be forced to play COD!
2020-06-06 18:53
#151
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Cod zombies to be exact.
2020-06-06 18:54
bruuuh
2020-06-07 10:00
#2
mantuu | 
United Kingdom xkz0 
Send link, can't find
2020-06-06 17:20
#4
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Its pretty recent i couldnt find it in the news put i saw a few videos from twitter.
2020-06-06 17:25
#5
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Poop
2020-06-06 17:25
#9
mantuu | 
United Kingdom xkz0 
check date: Mon 8 May 2000
2020-06-06 17:26
#11
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Yeah i couldnt find any new articles either but it i saw some new videos from Twitter lol.
2020-06-06 17:27
#54
mantuu | 
United Kingdom xkz0 
ahhh, k, link if you see any
2020-06-06 17:51
#78
mantuu | 
United Kingdom xkz0 
n1, cheers mate. My Great Grandfather died last month, he was 101, 102 this month, can't believe I had the pleasure of knowing him for 20 years, he fought to stop the Nazis, as did Churchill. absolute brainlets man stg
2020-06-06 18:00
#80
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
That what those vandals did wasnt simply just disrespectful towards Churchill but also the veterans.
2020-06-06 18:02
#6
JW | 
Sweden Hasklon 
Good, he was racist scum
2020-06-06 17:25
#7
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Swedistan XDD
2020-06-06 17:25
#10
JW | 
Sweden Hasklon 
men are u really defending churchill after he starved millions of indians to death
2020-06-06 17:26
#13
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Keep crying Swedistan you will never have a hero like him ;)
2020-06-06 17:28
#17
Finland Yapu 
+1
2020-06-06 17:30
+1
2020-06-06 19:21
what a delusional and disingenuous understanding of history. don't be jelly just cus cuckery is the most impressive male thing to come out of Sweden (and im not even English).
2020-06-06 17:37
#35
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Hahaha +1
2020-06-06 17:38
+1
2020-06-06 17:45
+1
2020-06-06 17:50
#58
stinx | 
Sweden günT 
Churchill was a horrible human being. His impact on the world war will never be forgotten but that doesn't mean you can look past all his wrongdoings.
2020-06-06 17:54
so I guess everyone pre-Civil rights movement was a 'horrible' human being. I can tell you've never really studied history, so stop trying to assess it.
2020-06-06 17:56
#69
stinx | 
Sweden günT 
I actually have lol, but nt. Churchill was a horrible human being even by the standards of his time.
2020-06-06 17:57
#72
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Why didnt he get called on if he was such a horrible human being "even for hes timeline"??
2020-06-06 17:58
#84
stinx | 
Sweden günT 
Do you think all elected officials, even nowadays, are good human beings? Personally I can come up with a few presidents and prime ministers that aren't exactly role models of mine. It's also not really a secret that Churchill was repeatedly called out on his racist views and rhetorics even during his lifetime.
2020-06-06 18:04
#85
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Ofc i dont think all of these elected officials are good human beings but Winston was.
2020-06-06 18:06
so I guess everyone pre-Civil rights movement was a 'horrible' human being.
2020-06-06 18:08
#91
stinx | 
Sweden günT 
Do you have the attention span of a 5 year old? I can't post a reply within a minute.
2020-06-06 18:10
can you count or read? it took you 10 minutes to say 'yes' or 'no' and you can only not reply within 10 seconds. goddamn maybe you did study history. topkek also I just wanted to make sure you didn't avoid it since you were.
2020-06-06 18:16
#107
stinx | 
Sweden günT 
I posted a coherent thought instead. If it's of interest I'm no longer at the department of history.
2020-06-06 18:17
so I guess everyone pre-Civil rights movement was a 'horrible' human being.
2020-06-06 17:59
#89
stinx | 
Sweden günT 
It's a discussion I don't find very interesting and one I usually refrain from, probably like I should have now as well. But no, I don't think everyone pre-civil rights movements was a horrible human being. I do acknowledge, however, that Churchill was questioned for his views even back then. Furthermore I don't believe every historical figure has to be disregarded just because they don't hold up morally to the standards of our time, correspondingly I don't believe we should worship them either. When you're raising statues of historical figures you're also inviting discourse about their impact on the world and its history. If Churchill is to be honoured, then he definitely is to be criticized as well.
2020-06-06 18:09
"its a discussion I refrain from" looooooool, imagine starting off a comment (in the context of a conversation that you forced yourself into) by saying some high horse shit like that. im done man youre too funny and tbh I just realised youre not the guy I was originally speaking to anyway.
2020-06-06 18:13
#98
stinx | 
Sweden günT 
"usually", "probably like I should have now as well" lol
2020-06-06 18:15
I like that you think that makes it anymore intelligent (self aware) and not just vapidly arrogant. pce bby
2020-06-06 18:17
#113
stinx | 
Sweden günT 
I usually refrain from it, yes, as any person with knowledge of historiography would. However the discussion was already initiated so I thought I'd exposed your freezing cold take.
2020-06-06 18:19
once again, I believe you entered a discussion I was having with someone else... idk why this is a hard concept for you to understand. but ill repeat it again in a simple manner... NO ONE WAS SPEAKING TO YOU (edit- you literally were the one to initiate...topkek) in fact if you look at the comments you were the only one asserting whether or not Churchill is good or bad. what was my take? id love for you to show me where I said we should be honouring Churchill? or when I said we should erect statues? or when I said we shouldn't criticise him? or really any of the things you believe I've said. I believe what I said is that attributing the Bengal famine solely to Churchill is 'disingenuous'. I also find it interesting that someone who knows what historiography is, thinks that there's only one point of view (particularly with regards to the topic of how we should assess the actions of past people) and that judging the past actions through the lens of the modern day is the done thing. I bet you'd shit on Said's Orientalism as being immoral because his lexicon doesn't meet modern standards. in fact I don't need to bet, following your logic, you should view Said as merely furthering the imperialist mentality he sought to expose.
2020-06-07 01:09
#182
stinx | 
Sweden günT 
Touché (for the most part)
2020-06-07 01:21
no worries man, I specialise in making people think I believe things I don't. I just like to argue tbh. like I said im not English, and I think Churchill had numerous empirical shortcomings that no-one has even mentioned here. there's a reason he wasn't re-elected after the war. my general ethos is question everything you believe and always refrain judging. personally, I don't think Churchill was a good person. but I don't think he was a bad person just like the majority of people (though this is apparently an unpopular opinion nowadays). 3head made this point in #43 (though I don't agree with everything he's said) that Churchill was a product of his time, and if you evaluate him as such you'll find that he was just a man. imo a fun test is to assess the man (rather than what people say about him) and think whether or not he would've been different had he been born in our time. personally I don't think Churchill would've had nearly as many bad views (100% still would be an elitist) had he not been born in a time when racism was scientific consensus. on top of which he was president at possibly the most socially, politically and philosophically turbulent time in history, you'd have to be omnipotent/omniscient to be able to come out of that looking good 100 years later. I mean the guy was simultaneously considering conversion to islam, whilst giving Israel to the jews. I think he was eugenicist and elitist (most conservatives are) more than he was a racist (which I know is borderline sophistry but the point was that eugenics was mainstream science at the time).
2020-06-07 01:37
#71
stinx | 
Sweden günT 
"don't be jelly just cus cuckery is the most impressive male thing to come out of Sweden" Don't think you should be lecturing me about my history knowledge while spewing bullshit like that.
2020-06-06 17:57
mate at least mines an obvious hyperbolic joke. yours is just objectively wrong.
2020-06-06 17:59
so I guess everyone pre-Civil rights movement was a 'horrible' human being.
2020-06-06 17:59
#142
 | 
United Kingdom AulrenT 
English =/= British jsyk
2020-06-06 18:40
id be surprised if the Irish liked or Scots and Welsh cared about Churchill at all.
2020-06-07 00:55
#191
 | 
United Kingdom AulrenT 
Can't speak for Irish or Welsh people but Churchill is respected in scotland, even idolised by some people. WW2 is taught in schools as well
2020-06-07 09:58
oh I thought it was pretty split in Scotland. the Irish don't like him for the same reason they don't like most Englishmen of that time. id bet welsh don't give a fuck.
2020-06-07 14:03
+1 deserved, UK should stop honor this scumbag
2020-06-06 17:29
#28
 | 
United Kingdom 3Head 
'I am seriously concerned about the food situation in India….Last year we had a grievous famine in Bengal through which at least 700,000 people died. This year there is a good crop of rice, but we are faced with an acute shortage of wheat, aggravated by unprecedented storms….By cutting down military shipments and other means, I have been able to arrange for 350,000 tons of wheat to be shipped to India from Australia during the first nine months of 1944. This is the shortest haul. I cannot see how to do more.' Winston Churchill to president Roosevelt.
2020-06-06 17:34
#30
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
+1
2020-06-06 17:35
you know if you actually read the magazine you would see historians referencing exactly what 3head is talking about. edit- I mean be real for a second. what motivated you to link this? cus idk how you could be so moronic on so many levels (I expect more from my Swiss brothers and sisters).
2020-06-06 17:40
not really, also it's not the only bad thing about him. no reason to glorify this scum
2020-06-06 17:40
"It was a failure of prioritisation, says Toye." "Arthur Herman, author of Gandhi & Churchill, has argued that without Churchill the famine would have been worse. Once he was fully aware of the famine's extent, "Churchill and his cabinet sought every way to alleviate the suffering without undermining the war effort" " now that we've cleared up your illiteracy, lets go through the points in the article. 1- Churchill was no more racist than any other person at that time. in fact, he was arguably less so given that he was alive during the rise of progressive eugenics and 'scientific' proof regarding racial differences. this is explained in the article YOU linked. 2. poison gas use. im not gonna defend that but limitations on weaponry in war was both new and still is a very complicated subject, particularly when such standards are not universally upheld (only europeans could come up with the idea of 'fair' warfare). 3. bengal famine, we've already been through. 4. statements about ghandi. if Churchill's worst features are: being unfair in war and mean comments about an opposing political figure who openly degrades the nation, culture and society you love. im sure we can find some worse people to waste our lives crying about. 5. anti-Semitism... Churchill was a virulent supporter of the zionist movement, and his supposed dislike of the jews (aside from that which was/is normal) was based off of an unpublished article that he MAY have written. especially when he is openly called jews the most formidable race. 6. the sixth point in the article is literally a compliment to Churchill.... wow must be a terrible person. 7. treatment of unions. wells he's conservative and they're understanding of economics means they don't like unions and even with that he was still pretty good towards unions, with most stories of brutality being unfounded. in fact Churchill's government was supposedly better to unions than normal conservatives. 8. because he was too involved with leading the policemen in the takedown of a Latvian anarchist gang... literally nothing to do with morality, its just cus people thought he shouldn't involve himself in such manners. by modern standards he would be praised probably. 9. criticism because the soldiers were far too violent in Ireland (and since Churchill controlled them all through the hive-mind this is understandable). but with regards to his actual beliefs he was more progressive than his party. 10. this point is literally just the archetype of someone looking at the past and degrading a person based off their own morality, without any knowledge of the morality of the past. realistically you and gunt are probably the most immoral people here since you believe yourself to be the arbiters of what is right and wrong.
2020-06-06 18:07
what's your point? most of those things aren't acceptable anymore. e.g. just because racism was more common doesn't make it okay now. we shouldn't honor people in 2020 that don't fit the current moral standards.
2020-06-06 18:24
#43
 | 
United Kingdom 3Head 
in my opinion Winston Churchill was a product of his environment, he was raised within British aristocracy during the early 20th century, his views were not exclusive to him, they were shared by pretty much everyone in the country, especially within his class. Not to say that they were right, but it's easy for us to stand here with our 2020 morals and criticize him. We would be foolish to say we dont owe lots to him.
2020-06-06 17:40
that might be true but there is also no reason to honor him in 2020.
2020-06-06 17:41
#48
 | 
United Kingdom 3Head 
We honour him for the same reason we honour our war heroes. Leading the battle against fascism during world war 2 in the worst period of modern history is definitely something to praise. Also, he was a prime minister, they are all honoured to some extent
2020-06-06 17:43
the whole concept of "heroes" is pretty fascist. and if he doesn't fit modern values anymore then there is no reason to honor him
2020-06-06 17:51
#57
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Concept of heroes is "facist" haha omg -1.
2020-06-06 17:53
> "Everybody is Educated to Become a Hero", which leads to the embrace of a cult of death. As Eco observes, "[t]he Ur-Fascist hero is impatient to die. In his impatience, he more frequently sends other people to death." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitions_of_fas.. it's also closely related to militarism, which is usually part of fascism.
2020-06-06 17:54
#65
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
I still wouldnt call having heroes facist.
2020-06-06 17:56
itself, no, e.g. communists used the term too, but it often has totalitarian tendencies and is a part of fascism.
2020-06-06 18:21
#125
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Obiously but it still doesnt make us facist or communist.
2020-06-06 18:22
#64
 | 
United Kingdom 3Head 
He fought for Britain against Nazi rule with almost no political support within his own country ?? He wanted to fight when others wanted to appease. He is a British hero? im not saying he needs to be honoured in your country, but you can't stand here and question why he is valued in Britain. And in regards to your other snide bullshit comment about heroes being fascists, you're just wrong, even edgy kids like yourself have heroes, you just might not admit it.
2020-06-06 17:56
as I said, he doesn't fit modern values anymore then there is no reason to honor him. heroism being related to fascism and totalitarianism in general isn't "edgy" but what most historians agree with, see #61
2020-06-06 18:20
#130
 | 
United Kingdom 3Head 
You clearly arent listening to what im saying so im done with this conversation. Britain is well within their rights to honour any war time prime minister they would like. Your opinion is pointless.
2020-06-06 18:27
I never claimed you don't have the right. I said he is a scumbag and shouldn't be honored and don't give a shit if people vandalize his status.
2020-06-06 18:33
#140
 | 
United Kingdom 3Head 
yeah, Im not sure why i was trying to reason with you tbf. You have the right to an opinion even if it is pointless and stupid. enjoy holding your opinions that no one really cares about i guess ? dont mean to rain on your parade but he is known as the best briton of all time within polls and is nationally loved.
2020-06-06 18:36
stalin is also one of the most popular person in russia, doesn't mean it's a good thing
2020-06-06 18:50
#158
 | 
United Kingdom 3Head 
Im not sure he is
2020-06-06 19:01
A record 70% of Russian respondents say the late dictator of the former Soviet Union played a positive role for Russia, according to a recent poll by the independent Moscow-based Levada Center. Stalin's previous high mark for approval was 54% in 2016, The Moscow Times reported. usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/..
2020-06-06 20:46
#181
 | 
Europe BIG_BIGFAN 
nt neo nazi, keep hating on the guy who took down ur wrong ideas
2020-06-07 01:15
??? out of all the people here I am like the least likely to be a neo nazi but okay
2020-06-07 01:30
this dude is upset about churchill because he helped take down hitler. if you were a closet nazi you'd be upset too.
2020-06-06 22:19
"what most historians agree with" mate you need to stop linking things you haven't read. Umberto Eco was not a historian he was a Foucauldian literary critic... I can't believe you think he decides what historical consensus. can you explain to me why people like you think the world started in the 1850s? the idea of linking the ideas of 'hero' to fascism wouldn't come out of anyone's mouth who isn't making a specific case study (like a foucauldian who's primary focus is post renaissance and conflict and who's methodology is generally to make connections based off concepts they create using language they decide upon aka arbitrary trash). the idea of a hero has been around since humans made stories, the thought that you can link it fascism concretely is not only historically inaccurate its just plain ignorance. (outside of the idea of a hero being used by fascists which is the exact kind of retarded reverse engineering foucauldians do)
2020-06-07 01:23
Eco's definition is really good because it's timeless. also heroism is just one aspect of fascism. Communist used the concept too. If anything that show how bad it is.
2020-06-07 01:32
#173
 | 
Canada reeeZ75 
imagine actually thinking like this
2020-06-07 00:58
imagine actually not thinking like this
2020-06-07 01:04
you mean educated?
2020-06-07 01:12
stop crying
2020-06-07 01:32
what a joke. please go learn about the world prior to the renaissance.
2020-06-07 01:12
#25
 | 
United Kingdom SPEEDYEGGBERT 
literally everyone in the 1940s was racist and he did win the war so i don't think he was scum
2020-06-06 17:33
#27
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
+1 He saved more lifes than he "killed"
2020-06-06 17:34
#15
 | 
Germany Schnauze 
he racist
2020-06-06 17:29
#16
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
War hero*
2020-06-06 17:30
WHO CARS MAN about mainstream bllshit. Every day hundreds are dying in africa cuz of no access to drink WATER and no1s give a fck. Lets concentrate on real problems , not on what MAINSTREAM MEDIA want u to be concentrated on ,u brainwashed herd of sheeps.
2020-06-06 17:31
#21
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
We have all ready gave a shit ton of aid to africa its not our problem if they dont know how to manage their countries:O
2020-06-06 17:32
U miss the point here bruh. ITS ONLY AN EXAMPLE , of what the real problems are. I took africa as an example.
2020-06-06 17:33
ok then mention some more stuff that you can back up with 100% trustworthy sources. You just watched some clickbait video on facebook from LadBible didnt you? And now you think you are woke.
2020-06-06 18:23
I was there on holiday and whatever the ladbible is , i did not.In fact i was there 3 times already . The truth is , u don't know me dude , so how is it possible u created ur opinion on unverified presumptions ? I know the answer , but ill keep it to myself.
2020-06-06 18:30
i was on holidays at barcelona when they were out in the streets doing their independence stuff, does that instantly make me an expert on the topic? No. All i asked u was more examples with proofs, and u gave me none of it, therefore your reply was really unnecessary.
2020-06-06 22:00
Ive been there and IVE SEEN IT ON MY OWN EYES, and i never said im an expert , which makes it another stupid conclusion uve made(not the 1st one) and that describes u best , but one thing i have to agree with u is , it's a waste of my time to keep talking with u , therefore go do ur things , no point to keep responding , really. U already made ur conclusions before me even responding to anything , missing the facts. Ure making ur statements based on ur imagination , which makes u .... person. bye
2020-06-06 22:19
#19
 | 
Armenia Yerevan 
This is disgusting all of those "protesters" are disgusting.
2020-06-06 17:31
#37
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
+1
2020-06-06 17:38
#20
 | 
Finland subhumen 
rip spunj ((
2020-06-06 17:31
Racist blacks
2020-06-06 17:32
#23
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Yes. +100
2020-06-06 17:33
Is it time to beat them?
2020-06-06 17:33
#32
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Yes.
2020-06-06 17:37
OK, I am preparing my leather black boots
2020-06-06 17:39
#40
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
😎👌 ....:O
2020-06-06 17:40
Why? Fucking vandals
2020-06-06 17:35
#31
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Because "he was racist!!!111"
2020-06-06 17:36
People just found a reason for lawlessness. Everything that happens resembles a circus:(
2020-06-06 17:40
#42
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Ikr
2020-06-06 17:40
#44
 | 
Yugoslavia al0)) 
gj!
2020-06-06 17:41
#47
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
:(( Wouldn't say so.
2020-06-06 17:42
lol, some pray paint xD Just clean it tomorrow and its fine again xD
2020-06-06 17:41
#49
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Ik but its still very rude and Disrespectful towards the man who helped Great Britain trough the shit storm that was called the 30th and 40th century europe.
2020-06-06 17:44
those people should have their mothers day cards spray painted on
2020-06-06 17:47
#52
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
+1
2020-06-06 17:47
deserved
2020-06-06 17:54
#63
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Expected from Turkey
2020-06-06 17:55
why
2020-06-06 17:56
#68
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
You guys never have anything good to say:D.
2020-06-06 17:57
so everyone who disagree's with this hypocrite person has nothing good to say :D nice logic
2020-06-06 17:57
#73
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Basically same logic those protesters are using to call us who disagree with them racist.
2020-06-06 17:58
i am not talking about these protesters, i doubt that they even care about racism they are there just for the loots. just like 80% of protesters in usa. they see their chance to loot for free
2020-06-06 17:59
#83
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Theyre claiming to fight racism.
2020-06-06 18:04
#79
 | 
United Kingdom VOSSKi 
funny how they do that if we lost ww2, hitler would have taken over britain and slaughtered every single black and brown person
2020-06-06 18:01
#81
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Yeah but these vandals are 2iq brainlets so what did you expect.
2020-06-06 18:03
#82
 | 
United Kingdom VOSSKi 
exactly, fucking idiots
2020-06-06 18:03
#155
 | 
Czech Republic Noxar 
You mean the ones who weren't there? kekw Also, blacks and muslims served in the German army, so lol. At "worst" they would be simply deported.
2020-06-06 19:00
#88
 | 
Germany shimmy227 
nice, finally
2020-06-06 18:09
#90
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Damn show some respect man.
2020-06-06 18:10
#97
 | 
Germany shimmy227 
he is a war criminal
2020-06-06 18:15
#99
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
"War criminal" nice one
2020-06-06 18:15
#110
 | 
Spain heyhey12345 
+1 only uk and america have statues of war criminals and slaves users xD
2020-06-06 18:18
#129
mantuu | 
United Kingdom xkz0 
Expected from Germany, go back to crying over Dresden and your 2-0 series loss against the rest of Europe
2020-06-06 18:24
'against the rest of Europe' that actually was a compliment bruv
2020-06-06 18:30
#134
 | 
Germany shimmy227 
yea sorry for questioning your civilian slaughtering idol
2020-06-06 18:32
#138
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Who is H*tler?
2020-06-06 18:34
#143
 | 
Germany shimmy227 
i would never defend hitler nor any other war criminal, warmonger etc. hitler was worse than churchill. in fact i'm an (libertarian) anarchist (and pacifist) so i barely defend and never trust political leaders. my point is the british still idolise churchill, even though he was a war criminal etc. they do because they won the wars and popular history has a bias towards the winners
2020-06-06 18:43
#144
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
ANARCHIST??????! yucky.
2020-06-06 18:44
#145
 | 
Germany shimmy227 
you should inform yourself about libertarianism, i agree it sounds absurd, chaotic etc. at first, cause we are used to live in states/ under (big) governments
2020-06-06 18:51
#147
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Yes and In my opinion anarchism is such a stupid ideology. In MY opinion we need a state with a strong leader like Milosevic, Nasser, Gaddafi etc high police funding, no globalism no investing in other countries etc etc.
2020-06-06 18:52
#156
 | 
Germany shimmy227 
well i won't try to convince you, that would lead too far. i also dislike the anarchism from radical leftists. i agree that strong leaders or monarchies can work better than democracies, as well as nation-states can be better than states lead by globalists or eu-fanatics. but that depends of course
2020-06-06 19:00
degenerate fucks kill them all
2020-06-06 18:13
#94
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
+1 the original point of These protests has already been achieved fucking brainlets.
2020-06-06 18:14
youth is fucking fucked
2020-06-06 18:16
#104
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Its starting to seem like these antifa terrorists and those protesters want anarchy.
2020-06-06 18:17
Has it?
2020-06-06 18:19
#114
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Yes.
2020-06-06 18:19
Why do you think that?
2020-06-06 18:19
#118
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Original point was to get the police officer to court. that has been achieved.
2020-06-06 18:20
The police officers that shot and killed Breonna Taylor are still free.
2020-06-06 18:20
#122
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Talking about Floyd.
2020-06-06 18:21
Floyd was only a part of the protests.
2020-06-06 18:21
#126
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
In America it was the start to the protests.
2020-06-06 18:23
Yes it was.
2020-06-06 18:33
Pretty much the police officer got charged and others fired which was the original reason for the protests
2020-06-06 19:23
In some parts, yes. In louisville it was for breonna.
2020-06-06 20:21
Good, I should have brutally killed him in my previous life
2020-06-06 18:15
#100
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
If you had done that you would be japanese now lol.
2020-06-06 18:16
Maybe, sure he had a big role to play in ww, but to us Indians, he's a sinner
2020-06-06 18:20
#119
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Yes but without him the japanese would have probably enslaved you all.
2020-06-06 18:20
#102
ZywOo | 
Portugal dipz0r 
Why have a statue of a killer in the first place?
2020-06-06 18:18
#106
 | 
Spain heyhey12345 
uk iq
2020-06-06 18:17
#109
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Almost every country has a statue of a "killer"
2020-06-06 18:18
#103
 | 
Spain heyhey12345 
they destroyed war criminal statue ? Make them one.
2020-06-06 18:17
Good, churchill was scum.
2020-06-06 18:17
#111
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Fakeflag:D
2020-06-06 18:18
Fakeflag:D
2020-06-06 18:53
#150
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
No I am from Norway just saw this on twitter and thought that it was fucking disgusting.
2020-06-06 18:53
nt fakeflagger:D
2020-06-06 18:58
#153
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Proof.
2020-06-06 18:58
good riddance, needs to lose its head now
2020-06-06 18:20
#133
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
He helped both chinas reclaim control over China soo.
2020-06-06 18:32
i can already see the 10000+ bullet points why it was totally okay to destroy that statue by leftists on twitter
2020-06-06 18:33
#139
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
In here also sadly.
2020-06-06 18:35
i dont see a reason not to destroy his statue
2020-06-07 00:58
very based. fuck anglos and anglo imperialism
2020-06-06 18:36
#159
 | 
Czech Republic Noxar 
Flair checks out
2020-06-06 19:01
#154
 | 
Sweden Lordzxz 
Why do people dislike Churchill wtf?
2020-06-06 18:59
#157
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Because he is "RACIST!!!1111"
2020-06-06 19:01
#160
 | 
Czech Republic Noxar 
hmmm BASED???
2020-06-06 19:01
#161
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
How I am Norwegian from stavanger.
2020-06-06 19:02
yeah i wonder why medium.com/@write_12958/the-crimes-of-winston-churchill-c5e3ecb229b3
2020-06-07 00:59
#188
 | 
Sweden Lordzxz 
Wow i didnt know he was that shitty huh
2020-06-07 01:55
#190
 | 
Sweden Lordzxz 
Kiiiinda racist aswell ngl
2020-06-07 02:00
nice
2020-06-07 00:56
#177
 | 
Brazil TACOburner 
I'm glad people are opening their eyes
2020-06-07 01:08
Blame Trump. The other day he claimed he was doing similar to Churchill, so in lack of a Trump statue then why not. Besides it is not like Churchill was without flaws.
2020-06-07 02:00
#194
 | 
Sweden DanzigOrWar 
I'd say this one is even worse youtube.com/watch?v=NvwiLyBFYi8
2020-06-07 14:07
#195
 | 
Norway Trip^^ 
Yeah I agree
2020-06-07 16:31
Thunder Logic
2.28
RBG
1.37
Secret
1.52
Tricked
2.52
Gambit Youngsters
1.31
Lyngby Vikings
3.34
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.