you still don't get it: no one says it is fishy that he knows/predicts someone is there. that was never in doubt. yet he seems to know the exact position, by pixel!! if you say it is not suspicious at all then you are blind. sure each individual clip could be a coincidence (except for a few which cannot even be explained as coincidence, like the one in monster), I agree with that. but all these clips are at least suspicious since the aim is so precise for not knowing the exact position of the opponent (again: it's not about knowing someone is there!). however, the sheer amount of clips we have now, makes it very difficult to believe that it is just a coincidence that he was just aiming at a wall, exactly where an opponent is behind.
and I have to add, the second clip looks more suspicious then the first one. the first one I wouldn't even call suspicious, as to what was said here, he might have seen the dot on the minimap and he could afford to only focus on the minimap since his mate was there, he could really know where he is, it doesn't look suspicious, which on the other hand doesn't mean he didn't lock! yet the second clip is super weird - no matter if he knew someone is there around, the exact aim is so weird - you cannot deny that, right?