Thread has been deleted
Last comment So, a Bangladeshi woman with a British citizenship joined ISIS. The UK stripped her of her citizeship, obviously. Now will be allowed to return to the UK to try to get her citizenship. What a clown policy is this ?
2020-07-16 15:13
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
Yugoslavia seeeed
Okay cool 👍
2020-07-16 15:19
United Kingdom scrayfever
uk fakeflag?
2020-07-16 15:21
Yugoslavia seeeed
2020-07-16 15:21
He's korean.
2020-07-17 16:58
what's the problem? a uk citizen commited crime, what should uk government do? A. sentence him/her with personal jurisdiction; B. deprive his/her citizenship and say "hey he/she is not a uk citizen now, so it's nothing with us".
2020-07-16 15:23
Treason is more that a simple crime
2020-07-16 19:04
This. Just give her a free ticket to Bangladesh and that's it.
2020-07-16 19:06
That's what SHOULD happen however, she only actually has a UK citizenship and under international law you can't revoke someone's citizenship if they have no other citizenship. You can't make a person stateless. It's stupid as she's a terrorist supporter but it seems these shit international laws are so easy to exploit.
2020-07-16 19:12
Yeah, it's a shitty situation. I suspect this is why some countries are extremely strict when it comes to immigration from majority muslim countries.
2020-07-16 19:23
She has bangladeshi citizenship I believe. Even if she didn't had bangladeshi citizenship, at least she should be exiled and never again be allowed to step british soil.
2020-07-16 23:00
United Kingdom Hammondo
She doesn't.
2020-07-17 11:38
Her parents are Bangladeshi, therefore she is bangladeshi by her parents.
2020-07-17 14:34
search it up man, she has no other citizenship. It was revoked.
2020-07-17 15:11
After of before she lost her british citizenship ? Even if she has no citizenship and Britain is obliged to give it to her, she should be permamently banned from the UK, exiled. Treason is treason, she don't deserve any compassion. I'm sorry but is true.
2020-07-17 15:19
What the fuck are you even talking about? I'm mentioning that under international law you CANNOT make a person stateless. That is why the UK is being forced into letting her back in so she can appeal to the court. She most likely wont win and will go to jail but still, international law fucks up once again.
2020-07-17 15:27
United Kingdom Hammondo
That is illegal. Also immoral.
2020-07-17 15:46
No it's not. She wouldn't even be near the first person to be exiled. Immoral is what she done
2020-07-17 20:41
United Kingdom Hammondo
You cannot make someone stateless. You can only remove citizenship if they have more than 1.
2020-07-17 21:35
Exile is not the same as removing the citizenship, IF I'm not mistaken, so you can't make anyone stateless through exile.
2020-07-18 19:14
United Kingdom Hammondo
Exile is stateless.
2020-07-18 19:20
Korea XigNw0w
Wasn't it misunderstanding the U.K government expected her to have 2nd citizenship in Bangladesh and after stripping it they figured out that's not true. Then Bangladesh themselves said that they won't give her citizenship under any circumstances as she is a terrorist.
2020-07-17 11:59
I think thats the case yeah, but because they did it first, the UK is forced to allow her back to fight the courts. International law is so fucking stupid.
2020-07-17 15:12
Korea XigNw0w
It's weird that Bangladesh can deny her citizenship until eternity but the U.K can't.
2020-07-17 16:08
Because they denied her citizenship before the UK did. Therefore she still had another citizenship to fall back on. No country can make a person stateless which is why the UK can't revoke her citizenship now.
2020-07-17 16:09
Korea XigNw0w
Wasn't the problem of the fact that Bangladesh made its statement after Brits revoked her citizenship?
2020-07-18 12:10
+1 this is the government giving out a sentence that stretches the entire length of her life without having to go through due process. If there is evidence of her committing a crime, there shouldn't be a problem with sending her through the court system.
2020-07-16 19:12
2020-07-16 15:24
This is the only way to do it imo She left as a British citizen, no matter what crime she committed our judicial system and overall our country is responsible for her and her punishment. Sadly the punishment that the judicial system will give will fall substantially short of what she deserves and sadly it is likely tax money will go into her defense. I wish we could just hang her and be done with it.
2020-07-16 19:08
Lebanon Dogman69
she was 15 and committed crimes underage, she should be pardoned.
2020-07-16 19:16
no she shouldnt, she is older and holds no remorse, has not changed her twisted ideology or world views and has made no efforts to reform. legal responsibility begins at 10 therefore she wasnt underage.
2020-07-16 19:25
Lebanon Dogman69
she is stuck living in some tent prison in a desert, how can she reform
2020-07-16 19:44
i dont give a shit how she does it, if she doesnt do it however then i see no reason we should treat her with any decency.
2020-07-17 16:59
Lebanon Dogman69
She deserves to have her citizenship back because it's illegal to strip her of it if it makes her stateless afterwards, especially since she hasn't been to court while stuck somewhere in Syria. UK and other countries just want these ex-ISIS fighters and brides to just rot there in Syria, so they don't have to deal with them and the publicity surrounding it.
2020-07-16 19:12
She had Bangladesh citizenship so shes not stateless
2020-07-16 19:15
shes not a citizen, she just has eligibility
2020-07-16 19:24
United Kingdom Hammondo
No she is not.
2020-07-17 11:37
'Deserves' and 'required by international law' are different things She doesnt deserve the citizenship of a country that was actively targeted by the people she joined, but it is required by law. No one wants to take back someone who sympathises with terrorists anyway especially as immigration is a 'touchy' subject
2020-07-16 19:54
Lebanon Dogman69
read the second paragraph of my post Countries are willing to go through blatantly illegal means so they can offload and take no responsibility for "the problem" I know that Finland rescued some women and children from the camp though
2020-07-16 20:17
United Kingdom Hammondo
Well that opens up a lot of problems, why not take away every criminals citizenship.
2020-07-17 11:38
Government should drone strike not charter a plane to bring her back
2020-07-16 19:14
2020-07-17 11:57
more west you go, more cuck aswell
2020-07-16 19:27
United Kingdom 3Head
I understand that she is technically a UK citizen and therefore, no matter what crime she commits she is the problem of the UK. I would bring her back to England and give her life in prison.
2020-07-16 20:03
+1 those ostrich are just hiding their heads in sand, pretending unaware that one british citizen is committing crime against humanity.
2020-07-17 11:32
uk best sftu pls
2020-07-16 23:01
United Kingdom Hammondo
It is illegal to make her stateless. She is not a Bangladeshi citizen.
2020-07-17 11:37
Yeah the terrorist that killed people in the London bridge attack was another case of Britain letting dirty fucking terrorists stay, hopefully when she comes back she is arrested or killed by someone
2020-07-17 11:38
+1 you join the ISIS on your own you're never getting back in. If she takes issue against that she can ask Allah for help.
2020-07-17 12:17
2020-07-17 11:41
what did you even say?
2020-07-17 11:53
I wasnt know this details
2020-07-17 11:55
everybody make mistakes men
2020-07-17 12:00
UK racist she black
2020-07-17 15:15
Expected from United Caliphate, the 2nd most cucked country in the world I heard they're renaming their streets and avenues to reflect the "diversity" of the country lmaooooooo
2020-07-17 15:35
lmao she will never be able to come back to the uk this is a guarantee
2020-07-17 16:11
WHAT A HUGE MEME MAN LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL Britain lets terrorists in pass it on -_-
2020-07-17 17:03 I don't understand why Bangladesh says she 'does not have citizenship'. Isn't she a child of Bangladeshi immigrants? Wouldn't be surprised if the Bangladesh state was just ignoring its own constitution Edit: yeah it seems they ignored their own rules lmao
2020-07-17 21:16
she was 15 so its kinda understandable
2020-07-18 19:16
public execution
2020-07-18 19:18
Izako Boars
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Odds total ratio
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.