Thread has been deleted
Last comment
GeForce RTX 3080 CS:GO benchmarks
South Africa LustedSilli 
Benchmarks for the RTX 3080 on CS:GO are out. Looks pretty good but who really needs over 400 FPS? Worth the upgrade from an RTX 2080? twitter.com/Nors3/status/130623542081720..
2020-09-17 07:34
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
#1
 | 
Guatemala Revigorate
yes then you give me your rtx 2080 😎😎😎😎
2020-09-17 07:36
no give me i poor((
2020-09-21 20:14
no me I am poorer
2020-09-22 18:31
will probably be useful to have to resist changes in performance necessity over time, as my gtx 1070ti has slowly diminished from producing 250+ fps in csgo to 160-180 depending on the map
2020-09-17 07:36
What's your CPU?
2020-09-17 07:37
it can be cpu issue i had i5 4690 + gtx 1080 and this gave me 180-300 fps and now i have ryzen 3900x + gtx1080 and have 400fps + on all maps
2020-09-17 08:32
What a fucking weird upgrade, especially considering that you changed CPU from Intel to AMD (means you also replaced at least Mobo)
2020-09-21 20:14
lmfao r9 3900x>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>whole intel
2020-09-21 21:33
flair checks out lol, i never said intel > amd, i just said that upgrading CPU that much (also Mobo and most likely some other parts together with it) is weird considering that he didnt upgrade his GPU
2020-09-21 22:49
gtx 1080 is enough for csgo even imoRR playing with i9 9900kf + gtx 1060
2020-09-21 23:07
thats some retarded build, guy probably plays nothing but csgo xd
2020-09-22 10:03
cuz csgo pro
2020-09-22 10:30
Maybe he doesn't just game on his PC? I had an i5 8400 + 1060 6gb but I upgraded to Ryzen 9 3900x and my PC is way better for what I use it for now (not just gaming) and it does better in gaming as well.
2020-09-21 23:21
Ofc it would be better but its still weird to go for such a beast CPU and stay on old 1060 6gb
2020-09-22 10:06
Again, if he uses it for video editing or something like I do, but I don't play any demanding games for when I want to game, just CSGO and some other games when I am gaming, he doesn't need to upgrade from his 1060. It would just be a waste of money to upgrade a GPU even if he was playing at 240 hz. I play at 144 hz so it's definitely a waste of money for me to upgrade the GPU right now unless I play other games or I upgrade to a 1440p 144hz monitor.
2020-09-22 18:31
tbh i changed cpu beacouse my previous start underperforming and i changed whole pc 1tb ssd +1tb hdd = 1tb ssd m2 + 1tb ssd 16gb ram ddr3 = 32gb ddr4 the reasoe i dont change gpu is it still work pretty fine i have 1080p monitor so i dont need higher resolution also with new cpu i all games i have 100+fps and thats my goal and rtx technology change almost nothing and use a lot of gpu power another con is nvidia is lying about their new gpu 3080 have 30% more performence than 2080ti instead of 2x
2020-09-22 07:19
on RT its x2, without its its 30% which is still massive upgrade
2020-09-22 10:08
#133
 | 
United Kingdom Hammondo
Even if he stayed intel he would have needed to get a new mobo.
2020-09-22 09:55
most likely yea
2020-09-22 10:02
AMD for poor people. Intel for quality
2020-09-22 07:41
if amd doesnt exist, intel would keep using 4c 8t on i7 processors KEKW go cry
2020-09-22 08:58
lmao take a look at your paycheck, and then U cry.
2020-09-22 08:59
lmao take a look at you intel benchmark and cry
2020-09-22 09:04
im using intel rn but i gonna buy amd next time u cry
2020-09-22 10:29
youtube.com/watch?v=QlBzs1wDWu0&t=511s ez 10 C temperature difference. massively better cooling for 100 dollars more? Yep
2020-09-22 10:34
#35
 | 
Austria MisterMand
what the fuck is performance necessity? xD if you get lower fps today than in the past its not because of the GPU.
2020-09-20 15:31
well its because of the updates they ship
2020-09-20 21:39
no. driver alone cannot explain 70fps difference in csgo
2020-09-22 10:07
i mean the csgo updates not gpu related
2020-09-22 18:22
doubt it. I think people are just using windows 10 with poorly optimized bios and system settings
2020-09-22 19:13
Probably not the GPU...
2020-09-21 15:25
Who plays on 1440p lol? I'd like to see 1080p tests.
2020-09-17 07:37
#5
 | 
Guatemala Revigorate
who plays on 1080p lol
2020-09-17 07:40
Surely a lot more people than on 1440p.
2020-09-17 07:41
+1
2020-09-17 07:41
+1
2020-09-17 07:42
+1
2020-09-17 07:52
#36
 | 
Bulgaria gosholin
+1
2020-09-20 15:32
+1
2020-09-20 21:28
+1
2020-09-21 00:57
#74
 | 
Azerbaijan Oruc24
+1 smart comment
2020-09-21 13:49
#90
 | 
Argentina EnvyJ
+1
2020-09-21 15:39
+1
2020-09-21 20:14
#132
 | 
Germany sommares
+1
2020-09-22 09:49
#22
 | 
Finland NIPZUZ
According to data that Steam gathers 65.55% of users play on 1080p
2020-09-17 08:39
#23
 | 
Guatemala Revigorate
we are talking about csgo???
2020-09-17 09:02
Not everybody is dumb enough to think that playing 4:3 will make them the next s1mple.
2020-09-21 15:31
#26
 | 
Israel GrandpaZ
I do....and ropz. And tabsen not long ago. Its enough ;)
2020-09-20 15:17
#57
NAF | 
Canada FuRR
and Twistzz rn
2020-09-20 21:41
#66
 | 
Israel GrandpaZ
True true, i forgot. 1080p aimgods ftw!
2020-09-21 02:42
Bruh you will bottleneck your cpu on 1080p xD
2020-09-17 08:28
i only play 4k lmao wtf is this where is 4k benchmark?
2020-09-20 18:16
rich menss here
2020-09-21 01:52
The problem with CSGO is that it doesn't utilise modern CPUs properly. The difference would be a lot bigger on Source 2.
2020-09-17 07:44
Old source engine is dogshit. Can't wait when csgo will be upgraded to source 2 engine.
2020-09-20 15:24
#31
 | 
Germany MTD3
Nonamer falls a source dogshit lmao
2020-09-20 15:27
And I am not wrong
2020-09-20 15:30
By today's standards it is pretty bad
2020-09-20 19:47
what do you mean "nonamer" who are you mtd3
2020-09-20 20:04
prob some hvh kid)) they always call everyone nonamers while no one knows who they are))
2020-09-21 01:11
#98
 | 
Cyprus Swishh_
2020-09-21 18:59
seen too many of them)) always german kids))
2020-09-21 20:11
HAHAHAHAHAH
2020-09-21 23:12
why is the HvH community so cringey smh 🤦
2020-09-22 10:09
You don't upgrade to a 3080 for CSGO. You do it to play new games.
2020-09-17 07:48
#14
 | 
Guatemala Revigorate
i'm almost 100% sure a rtx 2080 can run every game at 60fps+ on max settings
2020-09-17 07:53
My standard is 100fps. It's just a number I like because of 1.6 . 60fps isn't want I want. The 3080 is cheaper than the 2080 and twice as good though. If you only play CS, you can use almost any decent card from the last 7-8 years.
2020-09-17 08:25
it's not twice as good.
2020-09-20 15:27
I know. It's 57% faster if you want to get into more detail.
2020-09-20 16:57
no it's not :)
2020-09-20 18:04
Fine it's not. But it is.
2020-09-21 00:55
Yes it is.
2020-09-21 01:00
Still it's not twice as good. It'd be if it was 100% better. For example -- 1+0,5(50% of 1) =1,5; 1+1(100%)=2.
2020-09-21 15:39
#95
 | 
Europe Humber99
Bro, just shat ap.
2020-09-21 18:27
Nice argument.
2020-09-21 21:28
But you want FPS never to dip below your monitors HZ though and few are 60hz these days!?
2020-09-17 20:14
If you play AAA games on ultra then you probably know what g sync is?
2020-09-20 15:27
#129
 | 
United Kingdom trtr098
G sync compatible actually sucks because it causes flickering when there’s stutter. Loading screens and menus are the worst offenders
2020-09-22 09:07
Of course the more the better, but 50-60 fps is fine for single player games even if you have 120/144/240 hz monitor.
2020-09-21 13:47
sure
2020-09-21 15:22
? The game will still feel smoother on 120+ hz monitor compared to 60 hz even if your fps is only 50-60.
2020-09-21 15:24
I agree, it's fine for single player games.. not for competitive
2020-09-21 15:27
Fair enough.
2020-09-21 15:29
#64
 | 
Netherlands staticNL
playing games on 120hz is fun tho
2020-09-21 01:26
#69
 | 
Finland idukxd
Not minecraft 4k with gay tracing lol xd
2020-09-21 13:26
not at 4k
2020-09-21 13:43
#130
 | 
United Kingdom trtr098
Yes at 4K just don’t crank everything up to Ultra. Medium-High is barely any different but gives you 50% more FPS Edit: My bad, the guy did say max settings, but honestly max settings is just a waste of processing power
2020-09-22 09:11
only bots play at 1440p, 4k very high lmao, useless benchmark
2020-09-17 07:52
Well the point of testing a GPU is testing at higher res. At higher resolutions, CPU is pretty much irrelevant, it depends on how good the GPU is. At lower resolutions, the FPS improves with a better CPU.
2020-09-21 23:23
Exactly. Its a bottleneck thing to avoid. The higher the res the more load on the gpu. This bench makes actually more sense than most of the users here.
2020-09-22 09:05
>testing a gpu in cs go lmao
2020-09-22 20:09
Just because it is a CPU-based game does not mean the GPU doesn't affect it. At higher resolutions, the GPU will always be the bottleneck in any game. The reason people always talk about CPU for CSGO in benchmarks though is because most people play the game at a lower res anyways where the CPU is usually the bottleneck.
2020-09-22 20:12
my point was why would he test a that gpu ina game like cs go, absolutely nobody that is considered a cs player plays at 1440p or 4k, just useless
2020-09-22 20:14
Not everyone plays CS competitively. A lot of people that are more casual play it at native resolution, and some of those people play it at 1440p 144 hz. CS:GO is a popular game, so people will want to see benchmarks for that.
2020-09-22 20:36
I play it at 144hz 1440p, looks pretty good
2020-09-22 20:40
u guys have graphic cards?! i play on some shitty integrated
2020-09-17 07:53
#15
 | 
Guatemala Revigorate
I have a GTX 1050, it's literally the worst GTX series graphic card
2020-09-17 07:56
what's your integrated card? I use one too and it's a G5400 from Intel, it's not the best, but once I bought it to upgrade my old setup that got 20 fps in cs go, it's fine because i can get 70~100 fps easily and play some newer games
2020-09-21 13:51
#18
ropz | 
Estonia Kukkel
Still not good enough for 500hz monitors. But you will be okay with 450hz monitor @ 1440p resolution man.
2020-09-17 08:28
I know dude. Only have 300fps and need that 200 extra for 1ms improvement on latency :D
2020-09-20 18:11
3090 is the real deal
2020-09-17 08:32
1500$ real deal?
2020-09-20 18:06
1500$ = 99999999R$
2020-09-21 13:52
You don't need a powerful GPU for CS. Get like Ryzen 9 3950x or i9 10900k, EZ.
2020-09-17 08:33
You need when you have 360 Hz monitor.
2020-09-17 09:12
This
2020-09-20 15:23
good if you have a 360hz monitor
2020-09-20 15:17
If you want to play on 4k then yes
2020-09-20 15:20
0/8 bad bait
2020-09-20 15:34
it will depend on cpu anyways
2020-09-20 15:35
i7 8700k @5ghz + rtx 2070 2080 +400FPS
2020-09-20 18:05
"who really needs over 400 FPS?" 360hz is already out, 480hz will be the obvious next stop. I think this is good.
2020-09-20 18:07
99% of csgo players with RTX 2080 would gain exactly 0 fps upgrading to RTX 3080.
2020-09-20 18:14
why 1440p and why 3950x, i know pcie 4.0, but cmon, real test should be on 1080p + 1024/768 or some popular shit + definitely 10900k
2020-09-20 18:17
Who plays csgo at high settings? 1440p and 4K? In 99% cases, with the settings players choses to play csgo on, the game is bottlenecked by CPU.
2020-09-20 19:49
3700x & 1080 Ti master race 😎🤙
2020-09-20 19:54
yeah if you want to bottleneck your 1080 ti.. never buy good GPU with AMD bottlenecking processors, you just waste your money
2020-09-20 23:14
#88
 | 
Sweden Kasidro
a 3700x is nowhere close to bottleneck a 1080ti in anything other than 1080p or lower. But then again all GPU's are more or less bottlenecked by the CPU in 1080
2020-09-21 15:32
I play only on 1080p like triple AAA games , i dont like other resolutions because i need high fps due my 240hz monitor. So basically csgo, valorant and few more games that can support that much at 1080p or lower. It's a good combo afterall... I play warzone at 240+ fps and both are OC with all possible performance tweeks enabled in windows for obvious reasons
2020-09-21 17:40
#93
 | 
Sweden Kasidro
Yes you will get good fps with that combo the guy is just an Intel fanboi that can't accept that AMD blows the competition in everything except single core performance.
2020-09-21 18:18
I know , thats why i responded to him with "Pepega" cuz he's being one.
2020-09-21 18:24
Pepega
2020-09-21 17:33
nais try men
2020-09-21 23:10
Pepega
2020-09-21 23:25
#51
 | 
Europe Vallon4
Who plays CSGO in 2k???? Game looks like trash regardless of resolution. Also, CSGO is like one of the very few games out there that prioritize CPU over GPU, which is nonsense, but it does it, so these tests mean even less.
2020-09-20 20:01
unless you want to play 1440p or 4k getting the 3080 won't have as much as a performance increase, 1440p and 4k are more gpu intensive where as 1080p usually is more cpu intensive depending on the game
2020-09-20 21:35
Well put, imo the main point here.
2020-09-21 13:38
#56
 | 
Brazil Catatauu
csgo cpu matters more.
2020-09-20 21:41
#62
 | 
Lithuania Paulius_CS
Our tech destroying this 2012 shit
2020-09-21 01:07
#67
 | 
Asia Blitzer
lmao csgo loves cpu
2020-09-21 02:46
You dont need this, you dont need that. Lets make something clear. If someone has a 240hz monitor means that he needs to play at 240fps AT ALL TIMES, not 50% of the time , not 70% of the time, not 95% of the time but 100% of the time. With that being said 3080 looks sweet because it has room also for some fps drop along the way that wont affect something on screen. That being said i dont mind 3080 since im gaming on 144hz monitor and i found Radeon GPUs of far better value most of the time so ill wait for Radeon to see what is the deal.
2020-09-21 02:47
nothing can get 60fps on crysis remastered
2020-09-21 13:28
will barely get 15 fps in crysis remake
2020-09-21 13:50
WHY YOU MAKE SO MANY WEIRD THREADS???
2020-09-21 13:50
Cpu is still the main factor when it comes to fps in cs go if you use a resolution lower than 1080p which most people use. If they would benchmark at lower resolutions the gains would be even lower than the 1440p ones but for other games this card is insane
2020-09-21 13:56
#84
 | 
Sweden Kasidro
have a msi 3080 incoming but my main aim for it is not csgo, my 2080 can handle that more than good enough.
2020-09-21 15:29
Everyone knows the right way to play is 800x600 black bars everything at min settings
2020-09-21 15:31
upgrade from 2080 will not be worth tbh
2020-09-21 18:31
#97
 | 
United States oOMeowthOo
Bought ASUS TUF 3080, from a RX 580, can't wait to see the bottleneck I will get with a i5 8400 xd
2020-09-21 18:45
damn
2020-09-21 23:09
i mean choosing rtx3080 for csgo specificaly makes no sense as most of people doesnt have i9 9900k otherwise you would bottleneck or you can start playing csgo at 4k then you are good to go :P or if you actually playing some demanding games at 1440p like me
2020-09-21 23:29
ok maybe if you have 3700x or 10900k along with 240/360hz its worth getting a 1080 ti but nothing better. Who plays cs at very high settings? lol
2020-09-21 23:32
#119
 | 
Malaysia Suno[t]
MOVIE Maker slo l
2020-09-22 07:35
#116
 | 
Malaysia Suno[t]
can ryzen 5 run this and a b450m galax or do I need to upgrade both?
2020-09-22 07:19
what ryzen do you exacly have ?
2020-09-22 07:27
#118
 | 
Malaysia Suno[t]
ryzen 5 2600g
2020-09-22 07:34
shoud be enough
2020-09-22 07:38
#121
 | 
Malaysia Suno[t]
quite happy with my rtx2060 tho ^_^
2020-09-22 07:38
good for you :)
2020-09-22 07:43
#122
 | 
Malaysia Suno[t]
thx bro :)
2020-09-22 07:40
3080 is for 4k gaming tbh If you don't have an amazing monitor and a great computer overall it's not worth buying it. If you have the money to buy it and you don't care really about updating every other year then wait for 3090 and get that 8K experience on the way. It's just for rich people, let's be honest, if you're the average human you're looking at this and thinking on how it might get 1080s to be cheaper.
2020-09-22 09:48
#134
 | 
United States xcalibot
+1 im planning on buying rx 560 for 1080p csgo
2020-09-22 09:58
ViCi
1.12
ZIGMA
5.55
HAVU
1.17
SAWO
4.60
Beyond
2.97
Invictus
1.37
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.