"Your exaggeration is my mention of "same" and "similar", this is a miniscule detail that does not mean much in reality."
I said that because I actually trusted your words like an idiot that the player salaries were revealed then i realised that it wasnt possible, so when i asked you for proof you changed your wordings and also called that its "common knowledge" that col players are getting similar/same salaries but idk how that is common knowledge, care to explain?
"Rather than continuing the argument regarding player worth in c9, you change the subject to my difference in wording, but that does not relate to the main subject of the argument."
Cause i already shared my opinion on that? Why the fk would c9 pay the same amount of salary to a new guy and also to a player who has proved himself to the entire scene?