triple caution, samir you are breaking the car
harder -> definitely f1
more dangerous -> historically f1, nowadays drivers are safe af. Not sure why it being dangerous would be criteria for anything though
Yeah, definitely rally is more dangerous nowadays, but f1demands more from the physical part of the driver
rally is way more difficult. the road/condition could change after 1 car goes through the stage. i think you have to be more ballsy to push to the limits while driving in the forest with 180-190 km/h. also you rely on your co driver meanwhile in f1 you only rely on your driving.
F1 pinnacle of Innovation
Rally pinnacle of raw skill
rally is probably harder in terms of skill because u need really big balls
but f1 is harder, u need really good physique and psykik
but f1 requires u not to make a single mistake for 50+ laps at avg speed of +200km/h, lots of G-forces constantly.
if u press the gas just a bit earlier, there u go, u spun
thats how unforgiving f1 is
Anyone says F1 is stupid. Obviously Rally is harder.
rally more epic, nice jumps, corners and cliffs
yes rally very cool to drive but overtakes etc it's like watching aim_map man not cool
f1 is harder, i could do some amount of rallying, 150km/h seems not that fast for me, but 300 is whole different category.
rally is like global elite versus pro f1 :D
motocross/supercross goat yes
Rally looks harder and more dangerous, but I enjoy much more watching formulas because of the overtakes.
F1 is probably harder because of such small margins in times
Obviously rallly is more dangerous, no questions asked, and if you had to do rally as long as people had to do F1 it would be way more taxing, you just can't compare driving on road courses to driving on loose surfaces. Besides group b rally is probably the most dangerous racing series ever concieved.
I like both but rally looks scarier. It's slower than F1 but still driving as fast as the rally drivers through forests takes bravery.
Rally = Saturday qualifiers day in F1. All about make the fastest lap/sprint.
The Race F1 > any motorsport. Fastest cars in the world. You have overtakes. You have crashes almost every race. Pit-stop strategies, managing tires, breaks.
Although current state in F1 you just watch it at who will be at 4th place. Because HamBotVer is just boring. So historically F1 is better, imo.
rally- needs more skill imo, easier to fuck up, but f1 needs much more endurance.
people who not follow motorsports: rally
people who follow motorsports: f1
Look harder: rally
Actually harder: F1
both in their own way imo
Rally has harder tracks, smaller roads, loose gravel, rocks, other unpredictable things such as dust on road, wild animals etc + every stage is different.
F1 has same lap, with good road, but higher speeds.
So id say Rally is harder.
idk both are so weak these days. I'd take 80s rally over 80s F1 but 90s-early 00 F1 over 90s Rally/early 00 rally
Both are ‘harder’ than the other in different ways.
F1 for me this year I came back to F1 and I really enjoy it
Ahh shit I dont read text
Rally looks harder
You cant die in the rally due to a crash when a car hits right into you at a speed of over 250 km/h and after this crash your car looks like the Titanic during the sinking
These days, I would say Rally. in 90s I would say F1 had greater risk since it was open cockpit, no neck support, manual gearbox and speeds were high. These days Rally looks hard af.
not really to comparable
rally is carcontrol and balls.
f1 is perfection
both hard af in other ways
dagarous both but rally less safe
Cant really compare them, theyre both difficult
But rally is way more dangerous
F1 is harder
Rally is more dangerous
Rally of course
F1 = Mercedes Benz Hamilton F1