Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Finally gets a little closer to intel in terms of clock speed but the price...even poor people can't buy it right now xddd Ryzen 7 5800x = 450$ I bought my 10700kf for around 380$ xdddd Also max clock speed of 5800x is 4.7 while i running my 10700kf on @5.1 and don't tell me about freaking temps,I have around 38-40° idle and 60-65° under load(at games)...
2020-10-08 22:24
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
There's not difference in 4K so who cars
2020-10-08 22:26
8 replies
Lol who cars about 4k?Definitely not me i prefer hight fps and smoothness insted of some bullshit 4k and giant monitor
2020-10-08 22:27
6 replies
lol paid $450 to play csgo with 600 fps
2020-10-08 22:28
5 replies
hehe,who said i'm only playing cs go? I play a lot of games and also have high framerate so games feels perfect,here you need great cpu with high clocks.
2020-10-08 22:29
4 replies
Man tbh, any non competitive game 60 frames it's enough, no need to have 200 frames on Assassins creed. I usually limit my fps to this, so i avoid bottlenecks or power wasting. Only unlocking it while playing csgo or r6.
2020-10-08 22:34
3 replies
144hz or higher feels so good in games i just can't go back to shitty 60fps,i know it feels arrogant but it is how it is 144fps feels a lost more comfortable then 60 in any game even in old shitty games
2020-10-08 22:35
2 replies
and you need 600fps to play at 144hz ? You can have 144+fps with a ryzen 3
2020-10-08 22:40
1 reply
I have 240hz monitor but it's not worth it tbh,144hz is enough. Probably in cs go yes but not on games like,rdr 2 or it will not have 150 fps plus in cyber punk in at least medium settings. I just don't want to play on super low settings
2020-10-08 22:41
#8
 | 
Germany I_car
I car :)
2020-10-08 22:29
#2
Virus | 
China Wuhan
'even' ???
2020-10-08 22:26
#3
 | 
United Kingdom ShYgUy965
in my country ryzen is so much better for price to performance lol
2020-10-08 22:26
1 reply
It was better,but no right now,price it was only amd's advantage
2020-10-08 22:28
but 5800x is better in everything ghz is not everything
2020-10-08 22:28
7 replies
lol,where? "ghz is not everything" In games it's everything
2020-10-08 22:29
6 replies
still not worth it ryzen can beat intel with ram ghz it works with 4800 ghz ram intel max 2933 (im using intel btw)
2020-10-08 22:34
2 replies
WHAT?lol i running t-force 4500ghz xmp what are you talking about?
2020-10-08 22:36
and to be honest people who buy's amd cannot afford such expensive RAM cuz 4000ghz+ is expansive and people who buy amd don't want to waste much money.
2020-10-08 22:37
in gaming its mostly singlecore performance (excluding games like civ) and singlecore is not only clock speed but also ipc, and ryzen 3000 was already ahead of intel in ipc
2020-10-08 22:40
2 replies
Where do you get that info?Anyway we will see in benchmarks
2020-10-08 22:44
1 reply
There are some benchmarks (fe techspot.com/article/1876-4ghz-ryzen-3rd..https://www.techspot.com/article/1876-4ghz-ryzen-3rd-gen-vs-core-i9/ showing the 3900x (on 8 cores) outperforming the 9900k at 4ghz both, which means instructions per clock on ryzen 3000 are higher, but ipc is also dependent on the workload. Then again intel boosts way higher which is why they are overall way better for gaming. Even if the numbers amd showed are right, i am a little disappointed in the pricing.
2020-10-08 23:06
Ryzen 5 5600X - 6K / 12T mit 3,7 bis 4,6 GHz, 65 Watt TDP, 299 Dollar 300 Dollar = 255€ So you can assume a Ryzen 5 5600 will cost 200€ And he is probably better than the last intel generation.
2020-10-08 22:29
13 replies
Ahahahahah,good joke 10600k kills all of this, so 10600k > whole new amd's shit with even higher price
2020-10-08 22:31
12 replies
It especially will kill your power adapter. Or maybe I can use it as heather in the cold winter. I guess Syberia will buy a lot of them. -30C° no problem for the CPU. And You can buy a whole atomic plant to run 5 of this CPUs Intel is great in bullshit.
2020-10-08 22:34
8 replies
I told you about temps but will tell it again...amds 7nm is just bullshit there is almost no difference compared to intels 14++++++ so if intel had 10nm it would be better then amd's 7nm just so you know!
2020-10-08 22:34
7 replies
no difference?? but Intel is too dumb to change to 7nm... they try and fail. Try and fail is the new slogan of Intel and their beta cucks. And btw Intel has 10NM cpus... what kind of fan are you that you don't know that. Probably a delusional one.
2020-10-08 22:37
5 replies
lol i know that but it's not released at desktop yet so what buillshit are you talking about
2020-10-08 22:39
1 reply
cuz they try and fail. Intel
2020-10-08 22:39
i's just on notebooks right now and no they're not fail this is another lie and i'm not a fan just saying facts
2020-10-08 22:39
2 replies
AMD is the number 1 choice of all notebook producer at the moment. The 10NM must be great when nobody wants them.
2020-10-08 22:40
1 reply
I don't care about notebooks to be honest,only pc's
2020-10-08 22:42
Took them 3 years, from scratch none the less, to take the biggest dump on intel while also forcing intel to actually innovate. Win win for me
2020-10-08 23:00
How? Intel IPC is worse than on 3000-series amd. 5000-series amd 4,6GHz is equal to about 5,5GHz 3000-series :D
2020-10-08 22:37
2 replies
we will see in benchmarks,it's all just words
2020-10-08 22:38
1 reply
We saw already. +20% to 10900K. But on games the difference will be small and most people who have any money wont play on 1080p anyways where the difference can be seen.
2020-10-08 22:57
#13
 | 
Canada JC_123
ipc going to be like 25% faster than intel so you'll probably need to run 5.5ghz+ to beat the zen 3 parts
2020-10-08 22:31
8 replies
Lol,how would you know that??? YOu will see in benchmarks soon that even 10600k for 280$ will kill it all in gaming
2020-10-08 22:33
7 replies
#21
 | 
Canada JC_123
can't wait to see how this ages. Zen 3 is 8 cores per ccx so intel's latency advantage for single thread shit like games essentially no longer exists. The old 14nm+++++++ won't be able to keep up another 2 years don't be delusional.
2020-10-08 22:35
6 replies
Intel will release new generation as soon as possible so which 2 years are you talking about? And i'm sure their 10nm procceros will be better then amd's 7nm
2020-10-08 22:44
5 replies
#43
 | 
Canada JC_123
they are 2 years from 10nm. Their comet lake processors are still 14nm, gonna be basically +5% again.
2020-10-08 22:44
4 replies
not 2,probably only 1
2020-10-08 22:45
3 replies
#45
 | 
Canada JC_123
if intel gets their shit together NOW we might see laptop processors on 10nm next year
2020-10-08 22:46
2 replies
we will get it sooner,the question is will we have 10 nm DESKTOP proccesors in 1-1.5 years
2020-10-08 22:48
1 reply
#48
 | 
Canada JC_123
I mean they already have some laptop parts on their early 10nm but their 10nm worthy of desktop chips is 2022 no other way about it imo
2020-10-08 22:51
#19
 | 
Sweden botl0f
amd was all hype 1600 crap, 2600 crap, 3600 close but not yet, 5600 overpriced crap intel has always been the winner. people are just mad about the past pricings because of their monopoly. there is a problem now... amd is not the poor mans cpu anymore. so what are they going to buy now? a toaster?
2020-10-08 22:36
7 replies
#24
 | 
Canada JC_123
1600 competed with dogshit i5 7600, 2600 was boring just brought in people on old platforms so they can upgrade, 3600 was the king of current gen, 5600x will shit on every intel cpu sub $500
2020-10-08 22:37
2 replies
#29
 | 
Sweden botl0f
it will get destroyed by some casual i5's.
2020-10-08 22:38
1 reply
#39
 | 
Canada JC_123
#21 Are you blind or something? i5 is barely better than a 3600 no way it can keep up with a 5600x even at 5ghz+.
2020-10-08 22:42
"5600 overpriced crap" still less overpriced than skylake and kaby lake offerings were lol
2020-10-08 22:37
3 replies
#30
 | 
Sweden botl0f
they arent crap tho. you pay for high quality cpus.
2020-10-08 22:39
2 replies
#54
 | 
Belgium mainak90
Nope, people paid for same garbage cpus with same xore architecture years and years with 5-10% performance improvement gen over gen before amd came along, bridged the gap and pretty much will overtake intel on the only slim advantage intel has which is ipc lead. Too bad its gonna go away with ryzen 5xxx, btw how tf do you know that r5 5600 will be overpriced?
2020-10-08 23:16
what do you consider high quality cpu? What is worse when it comes to quality on AMD side?
2020-10-09 00:13
clock is just a number rofl, ipc is what it matters also, the market leader dictates the price
2020-10-08 22:41
3 replies
"nuber rofl" sure... You will see in benchmarks boy,how ips does matter)
2020-10-08 22:48
2 replies
FX-9590
2020-10-08 23:16
#55
 | 
Belgium mainak90
Its ipc, not ips, ips are panelsl types for displays lol. And indeed clock speeds does not matter, a 6 ghz naehalem or a sandy bridge cannot beat a 4.3 ghz zen+, let alone a zen2. So its IPC which is more important, not clock speed.
2020-10-08 23:20
#52
 | 
Brazil YUB8
Clock frequency isn't everything. AMD already had close performance to Intel with a lower clock. Now that they doubled the cache and reduced their latencies, which was their big disadvantage in gaming, those Zen 3 will for sure supass Intel.
2020-10-08 23:12
"Also max clock speed of 5800x is 4.7 while i running my 10700kf on @5.1" Learn about IPC and you won't write such stupid shit anymore mens )))
2020-10-08 23:24
All these intel fanboys are malding so much lmfao
2020-10-09 00:17
Its as if nobody saw the AMD event 6 hrs ago.... where 5900x destroyed 10900k... if amd keep having these improvements every generation intel will have a hard time, they already in hell atm...
2020-10-09 00:21
Higher clock speed =/= Better performance
2020-10-09 00:21
4glory
2.13
lvlUP
1.67
Nemiga
2.08
KOVA
1.75
OG
1.48
MIBR
2.72
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.