First off, the reasoning behind my first comment wasn't "Yo, no way Russia will want to do something dumb they already did once", my reasoning was that giving all the circumstances I'd say It's rather unlikely to happen and that ppl shouldn't give up part of their careers bcz of conscription.
I don't know what you are trying to say with this:
"well there was many finnish people and still is in karelia but mr. big balls stalin decided to execute couple of thousands so maybe that is why its more ruski based area now."
Do you think you owe same rights on Karelia as Russia does on Crimea? I am not denying that Stalin did retarded stuff, tbh I know very little about history nor do I care much about it, my point was that NOW u don't have as much ppl on Karelia in % as much as there is Russians on Crimea (I believe?)
"I'd like to ask u, would there be war in ukraine if russians wouldnt support and give fuckin tanks to seperatist?"
I have no fucking clue, maybe It would not? but I don't see Russia just saying "take it" and I can see some reasoning behind it.
"and what comes to russia invading finland. finnish army isnt build up to win wars against big nations and we arent in nato bcs it would increase the pressure between finland and russia. the army is build up to idea that invading finland becomes so costly financially and in manpower that it isnt worth enough to invade"
Which in a way means that all your efforts in having a well prepared citizens in case war happens might be worthless? Again Idk why are u telling me this, further more If we go by the same logic Russians, If wanted could've conquered your country but It just wasn't worth and If you consider that they at least they had Germans as an ally back then, I don't see them risking to conquer you today even If they somehow can morally justify that It's ok to do it. (which also kinda changed compared to back then?)