Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Vitality changing players between maps
broky | 
Turkey PhenomenonSSX 
Tournaments shouldn't allow this. 5 man line-up should lock before a day before match. It is not fair to the other team becuase long matches can be very exhausting. Letting a player rest while another team plays with the same line up in a series is not ok. A team shouldn't be rewarded because they have more money to spend on 6 players. (not valid in complexity situation but valid to other teams )
2020-10-29 22:17
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
#2
 | 
Europe AllowItFam
i agree
2020-10-29 22:23
#3
RpK | 
France pol44r
nt communist
2020-10-29 22:23
lol football
2020-10-29 22:28
#6
 | 
Norway stekt_laks
no rules against this, cry is free
2020-10-29 22:31
10 replies
#7
 | 
Norway stekt_laks
oh and, how much?
2020-10-29 22:32
I know that smarty. I say that there should be
2020-10-29 22:41
8 replies
I actually think CSGO would be a whole lot more interesting with even larger teams that have frequent player changes. Consider American football with "special teams" that are groups of players that are sent out just for specific plays. CSGO rosters could have players that specialize in pistol rounds or something lol
2020-10-29 23:06
7 replies
It wouldn't require skill and it would be so dull imo
2020-10-29 23:07
3 replies
? how would it not require skill? it would just mean that players become specialized instead of well-rounded, but being well-rounded is still important because you could bait the other team into thinking that a player swap means you're going to use a specific strat then you don't use it. it'd be much more entertaining. your argument so far has just been that people get fatigued; how does players getting worse throughout the series not become more dull?
2020-10-30 00:15
2 replies
#155
 | 
Lithuania dozzah
it would break the competitiveness of the esport considering that the team which could buy more players for more situations would inevitably win
2020-10-30 17:51
1 reply
I mean not necessarily. But also all the top 10 teams can afford it anyway.
2020-10-30 23:25
#141
 | 
Estonia Sn4pzhat
the games will be so much longer. Some players will do pistol rounds ( they wil get paid for getting in the game for 2 rounds). Then they will sign out main players will get on. Lets say 1 pistol player gets an ace, signs out. Then the main players come on. Who will recieve his ace money. Its bit unfair and no its not a great idea imo
2020-10-30 09:01
2 replies
I mean if all the teams can do it it'd be fair I think. I mean it'd be autobalanced by orgs not wanting to pay that much for someone who only plays 2 rounds, so that player may want to just go to another team and play more of the game. And there are currently already an absurd number of time outs. Only allow player changes within the existing time outs and boom doesn't take any more time.
2020-10-30 23:27
1 reply
#169
 | 
Estonia Sn4pzhat
well it could be possible rn online but on lan. Pistol round players set up their things. Then they play for 1 round, remove their stuff. Main players come in. Login to their steam, setup their stuff. And then the same thing happens again. I agree that the mid series change could be exciting and i have nothing against that but midgame switches imo will kind of ruin the game.
2020-10-31 08:47
Is a new way of playing CS and i love the idea
2020-10-29 22:32
4 replies
#11
 | 
Australia lo0u
I don't think it's practical offline though. At least not like Vitality did today.
2020-10-29 22:35
you can have 6 players change it game by game but it is not ok to change it map by map
2020-10-29 22:41
1 reply
+1 although i think you should lock in your roster before an event
2020-10-29 22:44
#156
 | 
Europe Pts
+1
2020-10-30 17:52
#10
 | 
Australia lo0u
I agree. But there are no rules set up to prevent this yet. I'm sure the next tournaments will change how they deal with this.
2020-10-29 22:35
3 replies
#151
 | 
Europe PowwneD
It's the ne meta, Vitality wouldn't pay the risk to have a 6th player if they can't use it
2020-10-30 17:38
2 replies
#153
 | 
Australia lo0u
It's not the new meta at all. It's just something so new that there isn't anything preventing it from happening and with few regulations. It's also very convenient in the online era.
2020-10-30 17:51
1 reply
#159
 | 
Europe PowwneD
Yes for the online era, but imagine adapting your playstyle to your opponent, Nivera is an Hybrid player(rifle-awp) whereas Misutaa is a pure entry fragger
2020-10-30 18:16
+1, it is stupid... like u gonna switch players mid game on a LAN ?
2020-10-29 22:35
3 replies
#21
 | 
Canada JC_123
yes
2020-10-29 22:43
2 replies
stupid
2020-10-29 22:44
1 reply
#107
 | 
France Des3yeur
no... you are just not prepared for this... it's not like they change player in 1 map...
2020-10-29 23:56
This happened back in like 2014 in LoL where Korea had 10 man squads, and it wasn't even a problem until those teams decided to only scrim themselves. And now they still have 6-7 men rosters, yet nobody complains. Why should it be different in cs?
2020-10-29 22:37
19 replies
#37
 | 
Brazil ghcnvbkn
because cs is not dota
2020-10-29 22:47
18 replies
So what? The game doesn't matter, it give the same advantage in both games. People are just mad cause their team lost.
2020-10-29 22:48
17 replies
#42
 | 
Brazil ghcnvbkn
no? I understand switching from game to game, but from map to map it is different, moreover, CS is a totally different game from Dota
2020-10-29 22:49
16 replies
Dude, map to map is the same as game to game in LoL. It's literally the same concept. You're just mad.
2020-10-29 22:51
15 replies
#45
 | 
Brazil ghcnvbkn
what the fuck didn't you understand? yes, this is the same as in LoL, but as I already said, these are two completely different playing styles
2020-10-29 22:51
14 replies
But it is the same. How is it not? Both games bring a player who could be better than the other on some practiced tactics. It's the other team's job to study them. But you can keep malding.
2020-10-29 22:54
13 replies
#60
 | 
Brazil ghcnvbkn
what's the purpose of lol? destroy enemy towers until they reach the center (I don't know the name) and destroy it too, passing through enemies and blah blah blah. now, what is the situation to be studied between lol and cs? lol you have to study the champions, some positions played by the enemies and that's basically it. while in cs, you have to study the weapons that enemies like to use, the positions they use, what they think in each situation and more. This is a difficult thing to study when, out of nowhere, the player you studied is changed.
2020-10-29 22:56
12 replies
Yeah, you have literally no idea what you're talking about if that's what you think both dota and lol are compared to cs. Won't even try arguing with you, it's like trying to fight a pig in a mud pool.
2020-10-29 22:59
11 replies
#68
 | 
Brazil ghcnvbkn
great, don't continue the discussion, great way to escape
2020-10-29 23:00
10 replies
Nah, not trying to escape. But it'd just be a waste of time to argue when you have no idea how complex LoL and Dota really are. And I could say the same for cs, how can it compare to knowing how all almost 200 champions work depending on a different build when cs is just aiming and shooting at people? See how easy it is to be like you?
2020-10-29 23:02
9 replies
#74
 | 
Brazil ghcnvbkn
ok, i admit i exaggerated when i talked about dota / lol, but what i said just proves how different the two games are
2020-10-29 23:04
8 replies
That doesn't change the fact that it's the team's job to expect changes (like, vitality even said they would) and adapt to the new tactics they could bring. And that's the same for all team-based games. It's like if a team got rid of a player and bought a replacement just before a match. Should that also be prohibited?
2020-10-29 23:10
7 replies
#83
 | 
Brazil ghcnvbkn
vitality said he would bring nivera, but in what position would he play? who would he replace? this can work in a sport like dota / lol, but it doesn't mean it works for cs. for example, simply saying that they are going to bring a lurker, does not mean that he will only play as a lurker, vitality can train him to play as an awper, rifler, etc.
2020-10-29 23:11
6 replies
And that's the other teams' job to research. They need to look at demos, scrim against them and shit like that. It's literally the same concept as now with G2 and NiKo. How will anybody know what roles will everybody else be playing? You're just biased and don't want to accept it. There's 0 logic against it. And btw, in LoL (dunno about Dota) they can swap multiple players before a match (which could make them play a totally different style, may even look like a totally different team), and then swap one during the games. I don't see how it's so different.
2020-10-29 23:15
5 replies
#93
 | 
Brazil ghcnvbkn
again, about your last paragraph, I already spoke, and I repeat again: LOL is different from cs. for your first one, yes, this is a change in the team (-some g2 player; + niko), but it means that one of the g2 players will not play anymore, it’s not like you need to study two different teams (one with such a player, another with another)
2020-10-29 23:17
4 replies
You're just too dense. I give up.
2020-10-29 23:18
3 replies
#95
 | 
Brazil ghcnvbkn
I don't know what you meant by dense. but thanks friend <3
2020-10-29 23:18
2 replies
I'd expect you not to know. You're welcome.
2020-10-29 23:19
1 reply
#97
 | 
Brazil ghcnvbkn
I believe it is a curse, but anyway, thank you have a good day / night
2020-10-29 23:19
Can’t give misutaaa- a young kid, much confidence either. It must feel dejecting and no excuse could cover up the feeling. I would imagine the coach will be helping him with reframing in his mind what being subbed means.
2020-10-29 22:39
21 replies
And he just started to find his form and play better than he did
2020-10-29 22:42
What if he doesnt like to play dust 2 and is actually happy about this?
2020-10-29 22:44
19 replies
It is not about what he thinks about it. It is just unfair
2020-10-29 22:45
5 replies
So if he is happy about it and there are no rules against it its unfair?
2020-10-29 22:45
4 replies
It is a thread bro. Just saying that there should be a rule.
2020-10-29 22:47
3 replies
Yeah and comment didnt touch on the rule but on how misutaa is feeling about this but you still go on about your "its unfair" even tho there are rules in place.
2020-10-29 22:49
2 replies
It is a new thing so they probably couldn't put any rules. I made my point about how it is unfair in thread
2020-10-29 22:53
1 reply
#157
 | 
France Insidium
6 man roasters have been a thing for a while now, and Blast actually allowed switching players inbetween maps
2020-10-30 17:59
Sure that would be best case scenario - I can see more experienced players thinking like that however usually competitors don’t really want to sit out in any sport.
2020-10-29 22:45
12 replies
If i was in a team that would force me to play map i dont like and i know i am bad at it i wouldnt mind that much but all this is only speculation based on that misutaa is OK with it / doesnt like to play dust.
2020-10-29 22:47
11 replies
It looks like it will be a carousel between nivera, RPk, shox and misutaaa - however there could definitely be obvious problems if someone plays great and is subbed and vice Versa and so so many other scenarios that could create dissatisfaction There are a lot of ways it could work as well too such as the one you’ve mentioned
2020-10-29 22:52
10 replies
I dont mind top teams trying to make this work, only thing i dislike about this is that it basically slowly kills t2 teams. This way heretics lost good player. And its 1 more tied up player who isnt on the market
2020-10-29 22:54
9 replies
That is another point i agree with you. cs cant thrive like this
2020-10-29 22:56
Well if in the long run it does work you could say it will help teams because they will be able to sell players to t1 teams as the player pool would need to be increased from a business point of view. Could definitely make it harder for them to win bo3s but I don’t actually envision it being efficient enough for that to happen and IMO it could lead to more upsets because it’s easier for team chemistry to build between people who play the same bomb sites and spots without adjusting to different people per map There’s a lot of variety here but there are more intricacies between players and setups in CS then a game like LOL
2020-10-29 23:03
7 replies
i dont know i feel that a lot of lower teams dont get to exist because a lot of talents will start to get tied up in t1 teams as 1 map wonders basically. Like if every top30 would do 6 man roster that wwould effectively put atleast like 2/3 teams into grave.
2020-10-29 23:03
6 replies
I can’t really see people being map specialists simply because it’s an FPS game and at the end of the day whether you know a map like the back of your hand or not you still have to click on their head.
2020-10-29 23:05
5 replies
Yes but you can clearly see with some players that they are not really good on some maps. Like sysrson on mirage for example is insane but on others he is not as good. Also that was kind of secondary point. My primary point is that you will have less free talent so teams like OG, or godsent or signings like broky wont happen so often now.
2020-10-29 23:16
4 replies
Exactly, there are a lot of question marks regarding it all but ultimately I’m not sure if it’s economically viable since most teams aren’t making money with 5 man rosters- an extra player only makes that more difficult to become profitable. So if it becomes a thing there will be a flurry of signings initially but it could harm the lower tiers or it could become a breeding ground for smaller orga to become feeders of talent to T1 orgs. People forget what valve decides; valve gets. It’s really what lord gaben wants to do with CS. I could see bigger rosters being more viable if there were more maps in the pool since players can remember all the lineups for 6/7 maps already. It’s impossible to call right now
2020-10-29 23:51
3 replies
"most teams aren’t making money with 5 man rosters" what? rich orgs get richer because of the sponsors. "breeding ground for smaller orga to become feeders of talent to T1 orgs" that is already happening. Also gaben clearly doesnt give a shit about CS
2020-10-30 00:11
2 replies
Most orgs are not turning a profit - they are bleeding money. With bigger rosters the rate of signings is likely to increase not decrease.
2020-10-30 00:16
1 reply
they werent bleeding money before covid you cannot use covid situation as deafult
2020-10-30 01:40
#18
 | 
United States big_brain
only money speaks
2020-10-29 22:42
1 reply
sad communist noises
2020-10-29 22:43
#24
 | 
Canada JC_123
its good. Hopefully all teams in the top 30 have 6 man rosters soon
2020-10-29 22:44
#26
 | 
Serbia TheSerb
Why not in league of legends this is a trend for years back
2020-10-29 22:45
3 replies
this is cs not LoL or soccer or basketball
2020-10-29 22:45
2 replies
#108
 | 
Serbia TheSerb
Whats the difference if a player is having a bad day you should be able.to switch him
2020-10-29 23:56
1 reply
#143
RpK | 
France pol44r
+1
2020-10-30 09:04
That was one bo3 wtf are you talking about, it can only make a difference if a team is playing 3 bo3s in one day...
2020-10-29 22:45
4 replies
do you know how tense it is to play 2 bo3 is in a row. Navi did it yesterday
2020-10-29 22:46
3 replies
tense and exhausting arent the same thing.You know that they have breaks after every map and that the player who is getting in as a sub isnt warmed up as others and wont play at his full potential.
2020-10-29 22:52
2 replies
he can practice his aim literally for half an hour and he can rest for another half an hour
2020-10-29 22:54
1 reply
Sounds good doesn't work
2020-10-29 23:16
#32
 | 
Russia RogueDecay
yes 5 man roster should be max standins should be announced before the event and if they aren't, team disqualified.
2020-10-29 22:46
1 reply
agreedo
2020-10-29 22:46
I find that the new strategical element player substitutions mid-series brings to the game is very interesting. I find your argument not strong enough to warrant stifling this new tactical innovation (new for CS, at least).
2020-10-29 22:47
#40
 | 
Serbia LtN))
+1 what if orgs like NaVi start changing players like this
2020-10-29 22:49
4 replies
-s1mple +my grandmother
2020-10-29 22:55
3 replies
#56
 | 
Serbia LtN))
i mean players from navi jr
2020-10-29 22:56
2 replies
m0nesy is coming dont worry
2020-10-29 22:56
1 reply
#61
 | 
Serbia LtN))
ik b1t also
2020-10-29 22:57
#47
 | 
Czech Republic Rewask
I also think this shouldn't be allowed until we get to the point where most teams have these rosters. Honestly being able to sub players in Bo5 is going to be a huge advantage. I do like the idea of switching players between the matches though.
2020-10-29 22:53
1 reply
agreed
2020-10-29 22:55
#48
 | 
Greece Leadervaf
Why misuta on fantasy has only 6 points and padding what that means?
2020-10-29 22:53
#63
 | 
Serbia el1teman
This also have been used in LoL and also in OW.
2020-10-29 22:58
Vitality got misutaa for basically free
2020-10-29 22:57
Why other team don't do it as well instead of forbidding it?
2020-10-29 22:59
I agree with you,this shouldnt be a thing,its already hard enough to prepare and practice against a team but just tossing players in and out will mean anti stratting wont be a thing anymore.It would make the game even more random
2020-10-29 23:03
2 replies
So are you saying teams will just learn 2 completely different playstyles with different players? You think their tactics will just change completely and their setups? You know how much work that is?
2020-10-29 23:13
1 reply
I dont mean like literally everything changes,but for example at least one player's tendencies and playstyle,maybe even role will change which is quite a lot of change.The team structure and setups might not chhange but they could even do that if they wanted to. I just dont like it because the game is already very unpredictable and random,this would make it even more so
2020-10-30 07:17
#75
 | 
World Fnstictop3
They shouldn’t also cuz people bet on games and when u see nivera instead of misutta after placing bet
2020-10-29 23:04
8 replies
Lol:D gamblers are responsible for their actions, they need to be aware of all the risks when they play. Cant blame the system if you lose your money by being stupid
2020-10-29 23:12
7 replies
#99
 | 
World Fnstictop3
Right and gambler deserve the right to know which players they are betting for. I don’t lose money but pretty unfair to rotate player imo. If u were right then why not just make a 20man team like football and see what happens
2020-10-29 23:36
6 replies
why would gamblers deserve to know anything? gambling shouldnt exist in the first place lol:D they take the risk knowing players can change and if they lose their money its their problem.
2020-10-29 23:45
5 replies
Gambling is a legal practice at least in most countries. Well no they only showed after map 1 nivera for map2. People expect same players last map and make live bets after first map then find out S1mple is the stand in
2020-10-29 23:49
3 replies
yeah? thats the same exact thing if a player got injured and had to stop the game midgame and they would have to get a standin:D are you saying its not fair for bettors if a player cant finish the game so they have to get 6th player?
2020-10-29 23:52
2 replies
I’m saying 6th man is fair just not rotate between maps. Yeah ok but in football teams have a bench full of players and the odds also change based on who’s playing. For example Ronaldo didn’t play vs Barcelona. Imagine they only announced at start everyone would be pissed they went on low odds
2020-10-29 23:55
1 reply
yeah but can you answer this question? do you think its still unfair for the gamblers if for some reason 1 of the players has to stop midgame and they have to get a stand in? thats basically the same as if there was a 6man roster and they switched him in without gamblers knowing it before
2020-10-30 00:08
This is a stupid comment on many levels. CS is only at the stage it is now thanks to betting companies.
2020-10-29 23:54
100% agree, if this become a rule, teams will start get 6,7 or more players, one rest and back better
2020-10-29 23:08
Wtf is this? "Its not fair" does it say that only some teams can have 6 players? If its unfair then get 6th player yourself and stop whining. Substitutes have been a thing in sports forever so why would it be any different in cs?
2020-10-29 23:10
5 replies
The problem is that csgo teams have yet to do this yet so there needs to be a set of rules for teams with subs. But for the time being, there is an inherent advantage from having a 6th man
2020-10-29 23:12
4 replies
And the advantage is? Any team can 6man, its not unfair system just bc some teams do it and some dont
2020-10-29 23:14
3 replies
Only vitality has done it so far (astralis not subbing mid-match), it's not easy to get a 6 man since there's contracts involved so teams can't all of a sudden come out with 6 man rosters in a month.
2020-10-29 23:15
#162
 | 
Australia lo0u
"its not unfair system just bc some teams do it and some dont" That is literally what the word unfair means. Either have all the teams doing the same, or none at all.
2020-10-30 18:28
1 reply
No its not unfair wtf? If anyone can choose to use 6 players then tehy can. Its not vitalitys fault that others dont do it
2020-10-30 18:40
I agree, 6 man rosters are fine, but if one player bad does one map, you can sub in another player and have the other guy warmup again, which is unfair
2020-10-29 23:10
I’ll also add - nearly every .org is losing money in CS with 5 man rosters already, adding another player to the books won’t help that issue.
2020-10-29 23:14
8 replies
That's actually the main reason Vita is doing it : they train one more player they can then sell without starting over with a new roster.
2020-10-29 23:22
7 replies
High risk - low reward IMO What if the player doesn’t reach the standard expected? It becomes an even more expensive venture with no return. I would say it’s good for a roster anticipating retirement or a change but economically it seems poor - it worked with esetag and astralis but it won’t always work - as it’s clearly not with bubskij hence his omission. I prefer what NaVi is doing by having a junior team in lower leagues.
2020-10-30 00:03
6 replies
Dude, you are speaking about cost to then promote a system with 6 players and coach instead of just one more player.
2020-10-30 00:10
5 replies
Yes but they are on much lower wages and are competing for money bringing an immediate return. Look at gambit youngsters - they made a lot of money for gambit and were eventually all promoted to the first team - however if it didn’t pan out they may have been able to sell a player or two and keep adjusting the roster and/or letting the rest go. The wages of just esetag is probably higher then what the whole of gambit youngsters salary was as a whole team. Yet they still participated in 50/100k tournaments.
2020-10-30 00:21
4 replies
I'm afraid you don't know how money works in esport.
2020-10-30 00:22
3 replies
Oh? Please enlighten me.
2020-10-30 00:24
2 replies
simply put prizepools are a small part of org revenue. Most of it comes from sponsors or investment money. Prizepools are mostly relevant for players. Also comparing C9 salaries is a bit stupid seen as at the moment only the likes of CoL and Astralis are anywhere close to the absurdity of those numbers and they´re an NA org (and one of the biggest ones at that) while gambit is a regional CIS org
2020-10-30 17:51
1 reply
Yes I’m aware of that - they are burning through sponsor and investor money for the most part in the hope that the future is brighter - I’m trying to look at it from a sustainable angle However prizepools are primarily .org revenue - in top tiers(tier 1 and 2) they only receive a percentage of the win and the org takes the majority THATs why players love the majors. Asides from the prestige of winning it they receive 100% of the sticker revenue
2020-10-30 18:28
The other teams can do it too and its not against rules, so i dont get ur point
2020-10-29 23:50
I absolutely hate this
2020-10-30 00:22
wrong 0/8 close
2020-10-30 00:28
#121
 | 
Australia Ohnorepo
It was a natural evolution once bo3 were regularly breaking 3 hours of play. When you have entire series going for 16-12. 16-14 across 3 maps, sometimes 5. Teams are going to get exhausted. Just like athletes need subbing mid match in other sports.
2020-10-30 00:35
#123
 | 
Croatia mds818
You do realize that most of the orgs can afford 6th player right? Money's not the issue, menagment is.
2020-10-30 01:42
Changing players between maps. Lmao, what a joke team
2020-10-30 07:19
2 replies
Then astralis will do The same what you say then?
2020-10-30 09:39
1 reply
They won't
2020-10-31 02:04
when everyone buys players from other team , Navi have a whole Junior squad . #MasterBlan
2020-10-30 07:27
#130
NiKo | 
Bosnia and Herzegovina Biske
Zywhoo wants someone to bait for him unluko
2020-10-30 07:50
+1 this is retarded and they should definitely implement something to prevent this
2020-10-30 07:53
#132
 | 
Europe Tsukisaki
it is something common to have a player sub in case of power outage, pc crash.... sometimes it is the coach, sometimes it is a stand in. Nothing surprising here...
2020-10-30 07:59
3 replies
It wasnt like that
2020-10-30 08:26
2 replies
#138
 | 
Europe Tsukisaki
I know but the result is the same.. Vitality had to adapt, it is not that easy to play with someone else.
2020-10-30 08:52
1 reply
If you practice with the new player it is not hard
2020-10-30 17:29
Nice try, but Nivera is SUB-member)
2020-10-30 08:32
#137
 | 
Asia loveall
There are already rules mentioned in blast rulebook. They have to name all the players before some days.
2020-10-30 08:36
#139
 | 
France MarioReL
It give an advantage to rich orgs that can afford 6+ good players. Its the same in football I guess. Remember its also a risk and a lot of efforts to make it work. I dont think its unfair but can give a serious advantage to the richer orgs. But I see also a great way to initiate pro levels to youngsters, they get to play a match times to times and learn how to play with their new T1/T2 team by watching them play and play with them.
2020-10-30 08:53
1 reply
but it would kill the t2 / t3 scene where players thrive. Non star players would have to leave cs to go vaLULrant. IGL role would die in t2/3 scene or support
2020-10-30 17:33
Com have more money like org dont talk abaut money.
2020-10-30 09:37
#148
 | 
Canada zizzle21
what about disadvantage of having a new/cold player come in lol
2020-10-30 17:30
#150
 | 
France naveJ
says the fan of broky , player of faze , one of the richest org in the world. Every org has the opportunity to build a 6 man roster , but vitality is like a family that's why 6 man roster can work , while in other orgs / teams it can be difficult because it will create tensions between players. That's not a question of money since in tier 1 cs every team has the opportunity to make that. Also, add a player means change the setup of game , new strategies etc... adapt for the new player it's not so simple.
2020-10-30 17:33
nt flag checksout
2020-10-30 17:39
I'd say it's interesting to see something new. I doubt it's gonna become the meta anyway, since it would be much harder to do on LAN, and as soon as LAN will come back they will probably stop doing that. I don't really see why it should be forbidden, I'm not even sure it's much of an advantage since it can create confidence problems for the players that get subbed. It's online so locking the roster doesn't make much sense since that would make it impossible to sub someone who has a technical issue or can't play for any other reason.
2020-10-30 18:15
2 replies
#160
 | 
Europe PowwneD
Having 6 player solve some problem that can happen: -technical problem -personnal problem - no coach substitution needed That can create new things: -adapting the team playstyle to the opponent -create different combinaisons But can also create new problems: -the role of the subbed player has to be knowed by the substitute -more practice needed So that's an investment but can work if they put enough efforts in
2020-10-30 18:23
1 reply
Yeah exactly it has upsides and downsides, and that's an interesting new way to approach cs
2020-10-30 18:34
6-7 players should be max. What would stop a team if they just built 2 teams that are top teams on different maps. Or you make a team that only plays on 1 or 2 maps. It would be unfair way more than what vitality is doing.
2020-10-30 18:34
Cyber Legacy
1.40
100pinggods
2.80
Complexity
1.20
ENCE
4.36
FURIA
1.36
North
3.05
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.