simple fans dont mald on me
Stole my method wtf kinda
GUYS THIS METHOD I USED BY Official_hltv_yoda I DIDNT KNEWED AND COPIED HIM
I thought top 20 will all be legends, but magisk and electronic do surprise me
Good list but somehow try to take MVP's more into the mix, then it will be better imo.
It actually does make sense if we are talking about years at the top
Guys im going to make a 2.0 list, which will have:
Top 3 advantage
Top 11-20 don't win points
MVP medals now will count
And i think i should count all time rating 2.0 as a variable, what u guys think?
problem with this is that later top 20s should be weighted because the scene has become more developed over time compared to 2013-2015
I did a rank with points, I will share later if you become interested but i give points based on hltv ranking and MVP's.
1. Each MVP I gave 2 points
2. Each time the player doesn't apeared in HLTV's rank he lost one point
3. Top 20-16 = 1 point
4. Top 15-11 = 2 points
5. Top 10 = 3p; top 9 =3.5p; top8= 4 p; top7= 4.5p; top6= 5p
6.top 5 = 7; top4= 8; top 3= 10 top2=12 top1 =15
It was something like that
guardian 3rd lol. Not even 5th best awper of all time
Magisk is 37 top 14 in 2016 bro
Making a new formula based on:
HLTV Year Ranking, MVPs and Rating 2.0
Nice way of looking at it. Well done! +1 for the idea xD!
I have a feeling some (Simple) fan-bois are not gonna like this LOL
Ik what the rules are but if we talk about goat gtr must be top3 imo
coldzera in 9 is very little for him, top3 in my opinion
The problem here with alot of Nerds is that being “GoaT” is a loose term ...
In this example OP is trying to quantify it, by using statistics, which in my view is better ... - There Will always be Nerds who Think this and this player should rank higher ..., however, here, The OP is using stats ... and as such, arguments like “he should be higher bl.a. bl.a.” are moot, because The stats did NOT justify this ...
- Read The Post (OP)
- Understand The context
- Accept The premises for The rankings (which The OP clearly Stated)
- Live with The results
And mind you, the OP did in fact change some of The premises based on external input ...
guardian played like 2 maps this year
Well, that's pretty different than what I expected but ok I guess
Literally the worst criteria you could have used combined with a retarded point system... The standard of players has gotten a lot better so previous years where people are undeservedly ranked top 20 have the same weight as someone ranked in the top 20 in 2020 where cs is at it's most competitive and people are a lot better....Each rank is only 1 point higher than the previous one so you could be ranked 10th and then ranked 3rd but have more points than someone ranked 13th and then 1st, what a braindead idiot. Just delete your thread and leave the thinking to people who have a braincell capacity of greater than 2.