Thread has been deleted
Last comment
cpu+gpu 300+fps @ 1280x1024 pls?
Germany BOTACADEMY 
What cpu+gpu would be okay to run csgo at 300+fps on 1280x1024 all low?
2020-11-24 18:59
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
#1
 | 
Canada JC_123
r5 3600 gtx 1060 / 1650 Should be overkill
2020-11-24 19:00
93 replies
Bottleneck asf 2600 is overkill lol
2020-11-24 19:01
52 replies
#8
 | 
Canada JC_123
you'd be surprised how low your 1% lows get on pre zen 2 parts
2020-11-24 19:08
46 replies
I might be, but I wouldn't care My setup 2600+1060 provides consistent 300+ fps 1920*1080
2020-11-24 19:09
43 replies
you must be a silver had r5 2600 and fps lows are horrible , going down to even 150 in gunfights shit cpu replaced it with ryzen 3 3300x and have double the fps , never goes below 200
2020-11-24 19:15
38 replies
#33
 | 
Australia ezmenss2
i dont go under 200 w r5 2600 rx590 1280x960 however r3 3300x is better for cs
2020-11-24 19:30
20 replies
I had r5 2600 , believe me it goes way under 200 ,especially on faceit when 5 guys are executing 1 site it really depends on the enemies tho , higher the level , more stutters , less fps
2020-11-24 19:33
9 replies
bad bait
2020-11-24 22:18
Why would i believe you when i have it myself crackhead These sheeple basing their opinions on benchmark videos kekekekekekewkewkk And then arguing about it kekekekekekeke Smh
2020-11-25 07:31
guys guys guys. it depends on other settings as well
2020-11-25 10:13
#197
 | 
Australia ezmenss2
"higher the level , more stutters , less fps" ?! how is this technicaly possible can you please tell me
2020-11-25 17:40
5 replies
people just do more stuff in higher level , more action - less fps you don't see full bombsite executes in mm , but how could you know , you are from Australia , your faceit lvl 10 is lvl 4 EU If your game feels smooth with r5 2600 on 144 or more hz then I'm sorry , you are a low level player otherwise you would see pro players using r5 2600 , but you don't
2020-11-25 17:59
4 replies
#208
 | 
Australia ezmenss2
lol
2020-11-25 19:23
2 replies
Damn if you do not have FPS spikes = you are noob simple as that. Real pros have FPS spikes because of their skill. But I do not expect you to understand.
2020-11-27 13:07
1 reply
#282
 | 
Australia ezmenss2
+1
2020-11-27 14:52
Hard agree, sometimes a guy just crouches in front of me and pretends to suck my pp you know. Lots of action and very swift movements causes stutters, drops my FPS from 151 to 149 and makes me lose duels. Them low level plebs will never understand
2020-12-25 18:50
not to mention that deathmatch wasn't even playable
2020-11-24 19:34
9 replies
#44
 | 
Australia ezmenss2
i dont have problems tbh iim playing wase dm nearly every day. what ram did you have? it really affects on ryzen cpus
2020-11-24 20:08
7 replies
on DM with 24 players on map like mirage it drops to 160,dude stop laying to yourself 2600x is bad for cs
2020-11-25 10:03
6 replies
do you know deathmatch in cs go is kinda bugged ?
2020-11-25 14:02
#148
 | 
Australia ezmenss2
its about the server wase+brutalcs servers generally dont have lag also i dont think so you can watch tests even in VALVE DM which is generally low fps its pretty fine: youtube.com/watch?v=oEvOLhHVozo&ab_chann..
2020-11-25 14:20
4 replies
yeah i have no idea why is anyone even talking to u u are probably mm player with really bad rank if u think any normal players plays valve dm u are crazy
2020-11-25 17:03
3 replies
#194
 | 
Australia ezmenss2
i said valve dm is bad servers what are you talking about ? Also im level 7 and i said before that i am playing wase dm. Maybe learn to read and not blame on people because you cannot back a fiction you are giving.
2020-11-25 17:22
#195
 | 
Australia ezmenss2
"buy new acc and then get ranked again if u are so sure u are better than your rank i bought 2 new acc in last year and on both i got supreame as first rank after 10 matches and i am in europe where ranks are bit stronger,so if u are better thank your rank like u said there should be no problem" expected from bought 2 accounts in last year :D
2020-11-25 17:24
I like valve dm, facing the morons on it in complete chaos really toughens my nerves
2020-12-25 18:02
#177
 | 
Romania SplaXie^
ryzen 5 2600x 1650Super here Constant 250-300 fps competitive play + streaming
2020-11-25 15:43
+1 r5 2600 never had a stable 300 fps at any resolution, r3 3300x is 50% faster in cs, and in gaming overall. Steve from gamers nexus named the ryzen 3 3300x one of the best gaming cpu's of the year.
2020-11-25 08:42
11 replies
if you buy anything pre ryzen 3000's the low fps should be the least of you worries. horrible input lag is the main problem. 3000's are great, 2000's are absolute garbage. 3100 is much better than 2600 and it is the worst one if i am not mistaken. 3600x is what you should go for if you want your fps to be always 300+. it's a great processor and the best for it's price too. obviously many intel and amd processors are better but it's not like the 3600 won't do the work cuz you don't need more than 300 fps in csgo.
2020-11-25 15:55
10 replies
3600x is overkill if you only play csgo, since current cs go engine can't utilize more then 4 threads, while the 3300x has higher performance per core due to higher clock speeds and lower inner-core latency, due to the fact that all 4 cores and all l3 cache are on one CCX
2020-11-25 23:15
9 replies
ryzen 3 3300x performs better than 3600x in csgo not in the other games tho
2020-11-26 00:02
1 reply
not talking about other games but still 3300x gives 90% fps of 3600 in most of titles for $80 less price (if you're lucky enough to find it)
2020-11-26 01:28
1. 3300x is not on the market 2. 10 fps more in csgo dont justify buying it instead of the 3600 because it's better for absolutely everything and will help with running youtube in the background and any other apps he may want to run.
2020-11-26 00:04
2 replies
as I understand it, he is looking for the minimal configuration to provide stable 300 fps, meanwhile 3300x is not available it can be replaced by 3100 or 3500x
2020-11-26 01:49
1 reply
3100 won't get you stable 300 but yeah 3500x is enough.
2020-11-26 16:30
If this is the case would it be better to stick with my r5 1400 and get it different board to overclock it (since it's in an Inspiron 5675 and I can't overclock with the oem board) or would it be worth it to pay extra for something like an r5 2600 and a new board and overclock that?
2020-12-25 02:03
3 replies
I don't think that overclocking will do much for r5 1400, it would be better to get some b450 mobo and cpu between r3 3100 and r5 3500x (except 3500 non x) depending on the budget.
2020-12-25 03:02
2 replies
I actually just bought a r5 2600 before reading this lol but it's on a MSI b350m bazooka so it may not post without a BIOS update. Like you suggested, I'm considering buying a different board, at least one with 6+3 power phases like an Asrock b450m or something to use it on and just sell the b350m
2020-12-25 04:09
1 reply
compatibility problems will occur only if your mobo is older than 2018 and has never had a BIOS update, which is unlikely. b350 + r5 2600 is a good build, I've used it myself for several years. FPS will not be as high as on zen2 or intel, but more than enough for a 144hz display. it rarely dropped below 200 for me.
2020-12-25 05:07
i can agree with your statement. I have 2600x 16gb 3200mhz dual channel and i go to 170 so many times during non Mirage maps
2020-11-25 10:01
Same. I had a 2600x and it got down to 140 sometimes.
2020-11-25 18:00
Bruh ryzen 3 3300x it's fucking sick paired with a Rx 570 I got 300+ stable fps
2020-11-26 07:10
rx 3300 it´s fucking op, i tried both 2600 and 3300x. 150+fps vs 300+
2020-12-25 01:54
1 reply
excellent cpu, but it is almost not available anywhere
2020-12-25 03:20
Lmfao sick bait bro
2020-11-25 13:20
2 replies
Not a bait Check for bloatwares if you don't receive 300+ fps with that built
2020-11-25 13:53
1 reply
lol stop trying dude
2020-11-25 13:59
cool story
2020-11-25 17:41
True, it's ancient code, the smokes makes you drop FPS like crazy afkgaming.com/articles/csgo/News/5551-ex..
2020-11-25 14:35
1 reply
#162
 | 
Canada JC_123
Yeah smoke grenades probably worst FPS offender
2020-11-25 14:44
what bottleneck? i have this and i get 400fps
2020-11-24 21:57
3 replies
lol i lock it on 240 and it rarely drops to 200 in 5v5
2020-11-24 22:34
2 replies
i have a 5 3600*
2020-11-25 02:34
1 reply
wildly good isnt it i love ryzen maan
2020-11-25 02:36
#311
 | 
Latvia kamixx
lmao ryzen 2600 sucks at csgo 1% low will be like 120-130fps
2020-12-25 17:52
#101
 | 
Russia SW@G_2
is csgo more cpu heavy? I have an i5-7500 and 1070 and usually get something like 240 fps in comp, half that on full ffa dm server. Same settings as op
2020-11-25 09:34
5 replies
Not really cpu heavy, but heavily relies on good single threaded cpu performance, since its running on a veeeeeeery old dx9 graphics API :()
2020-11-25 09:58
3 replies
so does this mean its not utilizing multiple CPU's? I'm planning to update my processor and I am trying to choose between Ryzen 7 and 9. Need for work too though.
2020-11-25 14:24
2 replies
so does this mean its not utilizing multiple CPU's? yes
2020-11-25 14:44
#164
 | 
Canada JC_123
difference between 8 cores and any more will be like 1% or less
2020-11-25 14:45
#131
 | 
Canada JC_123
yes it is mens))) I have r5 1600 pushed to its max and gtx 1070 ti and barely do any better
2020-11-25 13:17
I run a 1080ti with a i7 7700k barely get 300 fps
2020-11-25 10:06
5 replies
#132
 | 
Canada JC_123
if you had an OC'd r5 3600 you'd probably have 300+ quite a lot
2020-11-25 13:15
in 1280x1024?
2020-11-25 14:00
2 replies
yeah
2020-11-26 23:46
1 reply
Then there is something wrong with your settings or drivers.. i get 300 fps with a 770 and a old i5
2020-11-28 22:14
i have a i7-9700k with a 1050ti , still kinda rock 300fps idk how but it just does dont mind the bottleneck ty
2020-11-25 15:36
bruh I have an i7 7550 U and a GTX 1650, barely break into 160 fps on lower res and all settings lowest. help lol
2020-11-25 10:43
2 replies
#133
 | 
Canada JC_123
7550U is the problem
2020-11-25 13:15
French youtuber Capet you will have 500+ fps full high settings
2020-11-25 14:28
If you play other games then cs like gta or ac I woul pick a 1660 oc
2020-11-25 11:22
1 reply
#134
 | 
Canada JC_123
definitely
2020-11-25 13:16
fuck off with your 3600 suggestion loser
2020-11-25 15:27
17 replies
#187
 | 
Canada JC_123
?????? literally the best value especially for CS
2020-11-25 16:41
16 replies
3600 180€ 10400f 140€ youtube.com/watch?v=ge630T9CsC0&t=59s cringe, its 2020 not 2019
2020-11-25 19:40
15 replies
#213
 | 
Canada JC_123
price of 10400f shouldn't be more than $10 less. It's slower than a 3600 in CSGO I can promise you that. I think the extra $10 for a non-locked CPU on a platform that has an upgrade path is worth.
2020-11-25 19:56
14 replies
cheapest 10400f: 135€ cheapest 3600: 195€ intel has upgrade path too. rocket lake is gonna fit on z490 boards. also dont care about promises, benchmarks say otherwise. suggesting 3600 in november 2020 is just retarded
2020-11-26 00:14
8 replies
#228
 | 
Canada JC_123
suggesting a locked dead platform chip is retarded always
2020-11-26 06:46
7 replies
if you are implying intel is a locked dead platform, you are retarded. z490 is compatible with rocket lake which will probably beat out zen3 ever so slightly. you are completely clueless on hardware son
2020-11-26 13:37
6 replies
#250
 | 
Canada JC_123
so no DDR5 for rocket lake??? There's sure as shit no way they're beating a 5900x without going like >200W then. I don't think we've seen the best SKUs from zen 3 yet either
2020-11-26 16:53
5 replies
no ddr5 for zen3 either, your point? and its not upwards compatible with zen4 or ddr5, either???????????????? RL will most likely match or slightly beat zen3, so idk what you are on about. see last sentence of #238
2020-11-26 19:46
4 replies
#253
 | 
Canada JC_123
my point is without DDR5 as a crutch 14nm isn't going to stand up to Zen 3 now that AMD have architectures that have as little latency as Intel's for single threaded performance. With their architectures now essentially as good as each other, AMD's 7nm should always beat 14nm+++++. see last sentence of #238
2020-11-26 19:49
3 replies
idk why you still keep babbling. RL is gonna be as fast or slightly faster than zen3, so z490 is just as viable an update platform than B550 is. not just that, a 10600k OC performs 10% worse than a 5600X OC but costs about 80-100€ less IF the 5600X was at MSRP. but its not, so the price difference is currently almost DOUBLE or 200€. so for P/P intel wins the midrange, too. go home dude, you are grasping at straws. admit you are wrong and fuck off.
2020-11-26 20:08
2 replies
#257
 | 
Canada JC_123
OK nt Bob Swan
2020-11-26 20:09
1 reply
Ok dumbfuck. #238 and stfu
2020-11-26 20:10
its also 170 vs 220 dollars on newegg so the situation is no different in america. your info is outdated by about 15 months
2020-11-26 00:31
4 replies
#227
 | 
Canada JC_123
mens like 1 month ago it was $170 vs $180 just wait 2 weeks for stock
2020-11-26 06:41
3 replies
no it wasnt.
2020-11-26 13:36
2 replies
#247
 | 
Canada JC_123
just checked, start of november r5 3600 was $189 on newegg, i5 10400f was $181 on adorama (sold out on newegg)
2020-11-26 16:43
1 reply
fine. no point in arguing on what date exactly the 3600 became the inferior choice. fact is, it is now the inferior choice and has been for at least a month
2020-11-26 19:52
#218
 | 
Finland 7ones
That setup is definitely not enough.
2020-11-26 00:09
3 replies
#229
 | 
Canada JC_123
I can promise you it is. 1280x1024 low we're talking about so the gpu barely needs to be midrange and everyone knows the r5 3600 can average well over 300fps
2020-11-26 06:47
2 replies
#236
 | 
Finland 7ones
Settings doesn't matter as much as ppl think. Average fps is not decent measure as most of the time nothing special happens. Gun fight / low fps is the better measure.
2020-11-26 13:36
1 reply
b-but he can promise...
2020-11-26 20:11
i have that, ez 300 fps, playing on 280hz monitor
2020-12-25 17:55
ryzen 3600 + gtx 1660/1660s
2020-11-24 19:00
I have R5 3600 + Gtx 1660 and run at 300+ fps on 1280x1024 all medium
2020-11-24 19:02
16 replies
so its smooth and no stuttering
2020-11-24 19:05
11 replies
Yeah, its smooth and no stuttering. I run at 144hz monitor
2020-11-24 19:07
10 replies
i wanted to get something like r7 3700x + 1660 6gb, is it good?
2020-11-24 19:08
9 replies
2060>
2020-11-24 19:10
3 replies
NO SHIT how did you know that
2020-11-25 14:19
2 replies
Iq raised high enough to word an intended supposed to be sarcastic mockery But not enough to understand when the said mockery is needed
2020-11-25 17:38
1 reply
ok mr intellectual
2020-11-25 17:42
you actually should get ryzen 7 5800X or any other zen 3 cpu
2020-11-24 19:24
get ryzen 5 5600x its much better than ryzen 7 3700x for gaming and csgo, and i think the price is close
2020-11-24 22:35
3 replies
+1
2020-11-25 14:38
the thing is, is there any stock of that cpu?
2020-11-27 13:17
1 reply
here in brazil there is it costs about 430 dollars and still its not expensive for its performance
2020-11-27 13:51
I run a 1080ti with a i7 7700k barely get 300 fps?
2020-11-25 10:06
3 replies
I guess yes. At low resolution and low quality you can get 300 fps.
2020-11-25 13:58
2 replies
1280:768 or whatever
2020-11-26 23:46
1 reply
how the fuck do you get so low fps, do -threads 4 on the game and figure out your config i keep 240 fps Locked and it stays there with a ryzen 5 1600af and a 1050ti
2020-11-27 13:52
ryzen 5 1660 6gb
2020-11-24 19:05
guys if I buy rtx 2060 and i7 10700k I think it is, then how many fps will I have with almost everything on low? pls help <3
2020-11-24 19:09
38 replies
#13
 | 
Canada JC_123
like 400 probably
2020-11-24 19:10
7 replies
oh lol I thought it would be like 150-200. I was thinking about getting 3070, but seems like its unnecessary. ty bro
2020-11-24 19:19
1 reply
Bruh i get results like this on i5 6500 + gtx 1050ti...
2020-11-24 19:29
I run a 1080ti with a i7 7700k barely get 300 fps
2020-11-25 10:06
4 replies
#136
 | 
Canada JC_123
if you had 10700k you'd probably average 100 more
2020-11-25 13:19
1 reply
lol what? dumbest commment
2020-11-26 23:46
#276
 | 
Brazil angryyyy
u have bad game settings bro
2020-11-27 13:20
1 reply
no
2020-11-28 00:07
check streamer twitch, mrc9cs , he has that specs i guess, on comp maps gets over 400 fps with stream on
2020-11-24 19:12
1 reply
I just checked and he had i9 something and 2080 ti or something, that is better than mine I think :D
2020-11-24 19:26
dont buy intel, intel was destroyed vs zen 3. if you want to go high end get ryzen 7 5800x otherwise get ryzen 5 5600x, it should be more than enough
2020-11-24 19:24
22 replies
ty bro <3
2020-11-24 19:27
21 replies
youtube.com/watch?v=z3DectbIL80 you should get around 500fps stable with that cpu. dont worry too much about the gpu because csgo is cpu intensive, rtx 2060 should be fine or you can wait until rtx 3060 comes out which shouldnt take long
2020-11-24 19:29
20 replies
I was looking to buy on this friday because of black Friday so I could get it cheaper :P
2020-11-24 20:15
only thing i hate is people making fps test on dust2 which provides good fps even with worse specs.. best tests should be on de_cache, vertigo or nuke.
2020-11-24 20:57
2 replies
should get around 400fps easily
2020-11-24 21:01
Best way to measure would be playing ~5 minutes on a casual server while recording an ineyes demo. Then u can just replay that demo on every config and actually see how they compare on the exact same gameplay :()
2020-11-25 10:01
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 16 GB DDR4 RAM, 512 GB SSD this for around 1600$ would that be a great deal?
2020-11-24 21:00
12 replies
i guess yes
2020-11-24 21:01
zen 3 (ryzen 7 5xxx) will give you an absurd boost over zen 2 (ryzen 7 3xxx). so you really should choose the ryzen 7 5800X or ryzen 5600X over that ryzen 7 3700X. about the rest is really a beast. just make sure the rams are separated (8gb+8gb) and it should be over 3000mhz. you will be really good with that.
2020-11-24 21:04
10 replies
I cant switch the things in the computer, its like an already made computer so I cant put the ryzen 7 5xxx in. :/ but it is 3200 mhz, and I have no idea how to check if the ram are separated, and it is a danish website so I can't give link :/
2020-11-24 21:09
9 replies
you should get the parts separately then
2020-11-24 21:10
8 replies
I just really don't know how to build a pc and I am quite stupid so I don't wanna destroy my pc XD
2020-11-24 21:11
7 replies
you should be losing around 200fps with that cpu. i wouldnt so sure if i wanted to risk that 😂 building the computer is really easy nowadays, you have tutorials everywhere + the process was really simplified over the years.
2020-11-24 21:14
6 replies
well that really makes me wanna try it, but I don't know about motherboard and all that weird stuff XD I just found out today that AMD and Intel is not the same, like I still don't know what a gpu/cpu is.....
2020-11-24 21:18
5 replies
its pretty easy, also you can follow the instructions manuals that come with the components and in case of doubt you can just search: "how to mount x" and it will appear at least 400 vids about it
2020-11-24 21:20
you can copy the components from that pre built pc and just change the cpu to zen 3.
2020-11-24 21:21
1 reply
ty bro, I don't know what I am going to do yet, but I really appreciate your help <3
2020-11-24 21:32
if you don't wanna risk anything then just leave it as it is. the r7 3700x is still a very good cpu so you dont need to worry. also as much of an amd fanboy i am, i can say that the difference can't be as much as 200 fps, especially considering the map was most likely empty during the test
2020-11-25 14:27
1 reply
thanks bro, that really saved my day! I think I'm gonna go with that and then in maybe 2-3 years I can buy the 5800x if I feel its needed :-)
2020-11-25 15:26
I get mostly 500-700FPS on full DM 128tick server with 5600X and RTX 2060. Lowest is around ~400. Dust2 (64 tick) benchmark is around 700 avg Ulletical (64 tick) benchmark is around 550 and strangely it goes up to 650 when I turn on Gsync compatible. It most be some bug, can't tell if it has more to Nvidia, CSGO or AMD.
2020-11-25 08:32
2 replies
so if you should make a guess, if I buy AMD 7 3700x instead of 5600x and RTX 3070 , how many fps do you think I will get? on DM 128 tick server :P
2020-11-25 10:49
1 reply
around 300fps you can check this vid youtube.com/watch?v=HX2zudN1C7M
2020-11-25 14:41
#121
 | 
Romania SplaXie^
i get around 250-300 ( Mirage faceit ) GTX 1650Super , 5 2600X on low
2020-11-25 10:39
1 reply
ty bro
2020-11-25 10:49
tbh I have i7 9700k and rtx 2080, and i always have more than 300 fps, always. Always around 320 plus, with 1% lows to 240
2020-11-25 15:48
2 replies
I was considering AMD 7 3800x instead of the I7 because I was told that AMD was better for gaming than Intel, but idk ahah
2020-11-25 15:58
1 reply
i mean in terms of price wize probably, its not bad at least.
2020-11-26 13:15
depends on the level you are playing don't listen to all these noobs bragging about how their game looks smooth on 200 fps and shitty cpus if you have 144 hz , don't buy anything worse than i5 9600k gpu- doesn't really matter, but if I were you I would buy rtx2060
2020-11-24 19:22
5 replies
and get your ram to be at least 2x8gb 3200mhz
2020-11-24 19:22
3 replies
Does high ram frequency impact your fps by a large margin ?
2020-11-24 19:53
2 replies
absolutely , 2666mhz > 3200mhz can give you 50+ fps on ryzen cpus + its faster and smoother tho cpu temps will get higher
2020-11-24 19:58
1 reply
Alright ty
2020-11-24 19:58
i see everyone recommending the rtx 2060, but isn't rx 5600 xt better in performance for a similar price? or am i missing something
2020-11-27 13:20
i5 9600kf + gtx 1060 3gb ryzen 5 3600 or ryzen 5 3600x + 1060 3gb i5 9500f + gtx 1060 3gb or i5 9400f and z370 and oc ram to 3200+ i7 8700 + gtx 1060 3gb second handed i5 7600k + z270 +ram oc 3200 + gtx 1060 3gb Ryzen 5 2600x + gtx 1060 3gb + ram 3200 if u dont like gtx 1060 choose rx 570
2020-11-24 19:23
9 replies
1060 too old , invest in rtx 2060 instead
2020-11-24 19:24
6 replies
It all depends on the money, I do not argue it is better :) Cs is cpu intensive game I'd rather leave 1060 and buy i7 10700k
2020-11-24 19:25
2 replies
ye but that would be a bottleneck its the end of 2020 , no reason to invest in 1060 3gb buy everything good and you are safe for 4-5 years
2020-11-24 19:28
buyinfg intel lmao
2020-11-25 09:38
no need 2060 for cs go , i played on gtx 1050 at 240hz and it was fine , i change to 2060 super and idk maybe +50 fps , not much
2020-11-24 19:29
2 replies
50 fps is signifcant, also you can play other games with higher quality with a 2060
2020-12-25 17:58
1 reply
ye men but its almost 0 improve when its for example 300+50 fps it could be huge difference if 200+50 stable fps but running 200-500 fps depens on map situation ...
2020-12-25 18:32
#38
 | 
United States KANYE2024
1060 is pretty bad I'm starting to lag with it. I do have a good CPU btw))
2020-11-24 19:42
#326
 | 
Poland morosek
1060 3gb is awful, 6gb is decent
2020-12-30 07:16
I play in r5 5600x 16gb 3600 cl16 and gtx 1070. I am sometimes over 1000fps. Never under 300 moslty around 500. With faceit 4:3 low-mid Settings
2020-11-24 19:23
5 replies
thats a cap bro every cpu goes to 220-230 in heavy gunfights , no matter if its r5 3600 or i9 9900k
2020-11-24 19:27
2 replies
Its crazy... dude the FPS are insane
2020-11-24 19:39
#137
 | 
Canada JC_123
0/8 it averages well over 400 on low res
2020-11-25 13:20
+1 I have exactly the same specs, ryzen 5000 are beasts in cs go.
2020-11-24 19:27
MIGht get this one with gtx 1660 or so
2020-11-24 19:41
i7 10700k, oc it to 5/5.1ghz (game is cpu bound), and gpu: RTX 2060 Super will be enough. Remember RAM (important for high refresh gaming) - G.Skill Trident Z 3600CL16 is a good start! You can OC to 4000CL15. Enjoy 500-600FPS constant, never dropping below 300. Lowest I get with this build 1280x960 ALL low, 8XAA, is 350-400. Its a dream. Its buttersmooth.
2020-11-24 19:51
4 replies
Why is high ram frequency this important for high refresh gaming ?Is there a significant latency reduction between a ram @ 2666Mhz and 3200mhz ?
2020-11-24 19:55
3 replies
It increaes the 1% lows, so your minimum fps is increased. Max fps is not so important.. if you play with 144hz its just important to not go under 144, so you might not need high freq ram for that, but if you play 240/360hz it most certainly matters. Honestly the difference was bigger than I thought. Had 2x8 3200cl16, kinda crappy hynix ram (hyperx) that couldnt oc. System felt sluggish and I wasnt happy. Then I got 2x8 oc to 4000cl15 and god damn the difference.. it feels like the monitor and the mouse moves waaay smoother. Faster, snappier... worth the investment imo.
2020-11-24 22:19
1 reply
Thanks for the explanation
2020-11-24 22:33
higher ram frequency helps feed the CPU and GPU constantly, I guess. you gain 10-15% performance in any case with a strong ram overclock
2020-11-25 15:30
#45
zon1Q | 
Germany iigga
I have Ryzen 5 3600x + Gtx 1050 = +300 fps ez
2020-11-24 20:10
2 replies
#69
 | 
Czech Republic Guczy
please no
2020-11-24 22:18
1 reply
#94
zon1Q | 
Germany iigga
??????????????????????????????? Reply needs to have actual content
2020-11-25 00:24
Dude, you will get fps drops in any case, even on RTX 2080 and some coolass Intel CPU. Because only DX12 utilizes modern CPUs fully, and there's simply no way Source engine will support in anytime soon (if ever). So don't listen to those who suggest you anything, because there's no PC that can handle it at constant 300 fps, it will drop lower.
2020-11-24 20:15
11 replies
Sry dude bullshit. I am on ryzen 5 5600x and never under 300
2020-11-24 20:18
10 replies
which gpu?
2020-11-24 20:21
640x480 all low?
2020-11-24 22:14
8 replies
5600X doesnt drop under 300 even on 2K res.
2020-11-25 09:40
7 replies
So 5600X is so cool that it handles games alone, without any GPU huh?
2020-11-25 09:45
6 replies
No, it doesn't have integrated graphics.
2020-11-25 09:46
5 replies
So what's your GPU that handles CS:GO with minimum 300 fps @ 2560x1440 all high?
2020-11-25 10:35
4 replies
you probably dont even need a new gen gpu for that. though rtx 3070 should easily do the job.
2020-11-25 13:10
3 replies
What's the GPU that you guarantee handles it without drops lower than 300 fps?
2020-11-25 13:24
2 replies
Gtx 1070
2020-11-26 16:04
1 reply
It's bullshit. 1660ti gives only 200+ on FullHD (ultra settings) but 1070 somehow gives 300+ on 2K? It is bullshit.
2020-11-30 08:00
3300x, 1650 super
2020-11-24 21:23
#63
NBK- | 
India Aded
I'll use this thread to ask a ques since i cant post one. I have a 1660 super but my CPU is highly bottlenecking it, so which cpu should I buy? I have enough money for i5 6400F + a compatible motherboard, will it negate the bottleneck or is my ONLY choice an AMD ryzen 3600? I really wanna choose intel.
2020-11-24 21:29
2 replies
Go for amd. Try to get a ryzen 5000
2020-11-24 21:54
look for the combo of high frequency + high cache and 6cores/threads or + honestly, i have an i7 7700 with 1050ti and i run it 200+ constantly, lowest drops at 170 tops..
2020-11-24 22:24
just get a 144hz or above monitor and anything above a 1050ti should be good
2020-11-24 22:18
6 replies
#74, 1050ti is a very brave gpu if you ask me..
2020-11-24 22:24
5 replies
"anything above". im using a 1050ti now and I'd recommend anything with more performance
2020-11-24 22:31
4 replies
the point is that with a good cpu, 1050ti should be enough.. it is for me, anyways
2020-11-24 22:31
3 replies
good enough for 1v1 servers where u get 300 and above fps xd
2020-11-24 22:32
2 replies
hahaha.. as long as there is no smokes or mollies, all good 👍 jokes aside, i play comp and dm.. i do get some noticeable stuttering on DM but on comp it's smooth as silk
2020-11-24 22:35
1 reply
same lol
2020-11-24 22:37
#72
Bymas | 
Kuwait roye
wait for ryzenn its made for cs, btw i dont get why people say 150-200 fps is bad its really not, if its super stable even 100 is fine for competetiv>>> maybe not profesional where you want every frag you can posibly get
2020-11-24 22:23
6 replies
it depends on your monitor rate.. if you're using 144hz you should have at least stable 200 with drops not getting near 170, otherewise you'll notice on screen and will fuck you up.. i thought at first this was a myth, but it isn't.. sometimes you notice the stuttering on the monitor wih 180fps :o
2020-11-24 22:25
#117
 | 
Slovakia depresia
200+ fps is like bare minimum for playable experience otherwise it feels laggy as hell . Not sure if its cuz of old engine or something else but CS has never run smoothly compared to other games
2020-11-25 10:19
4 replies
#140
Bymas | 
Kuwait roye
no 100 fps is completely normal, what matters even more fps jumping, maybe your fps is jumping when under 200, but if its stable 100 fps is pretty normal.
2020-11-25 13:47
#151
Bymas | 
Kuwait roye
ofc its 300 gonna be better than 100 but both are playable just that 300 will give you comfort you can hive all types of excuses why you trash i think i reached mg in wingman with 29 fps xd
2020-11-25 14:27
2 replies
#191
 | 
Slovakia depresia
I got to supreme on unstable 60fps , my point still stands though . For Example Valorant on locked 60 fps feels significantly smoother than cs on 300 fps . Ihave no idea why , its just how it feels to me .
2020-11-25 16:58
1 reply
maybe because cs engine is old
2020-11-25 18:17
#73
 | 
Estonia mr_abdul
I have i5 9500 and 1060 and I get that, I'm sure you can get 300 with a little worse setup tho
2020-11-24 22:21
also remember to get a gaming motherboard
2020-11-24 22:32
3 replies
wats the diference between gaming mobo and normal mobo?
2020-11-24 22:42
2 replies
depends on the mobo but some gaming motherboards have better specs than regular ones, which results in better performance
2020-11-24 22:47
1 reply
Only if do extreme overclocking
2020-11-26 00:18
Get an R5 5600X and any entry/mid-level GPU from either Nvidia or AMD. If you're playing CS only and don't wanna spend much, search for a 3600 + 1650 or smth like that.
2020-11-24 22:41
Get an R5 5600X and any entry/mid-level GPU from either Nvidia or AMD. If you're playing CS only and don't wanna spend much, search for a 3600 + 1650 or smth like that.
2020-11-24 22:41
i5 9400f + rx 5500 xt 8gb
2020-11-24 22:41
R9 5950X + RTX 3090 + 64 GB Ram 3600 Mhz should be just fine
2020-11-24 22:43
3 replies
64gb ram? wtf :D 8 is fine, but 16 is what you should go for
2020-11-25 14:43
2 replies
#264
 | 
Nigeria Fraggot
8 really isn't even close to enough for modern games. Even modded minecraft can use up to 8 gigs.
2020-11-26 20:55
1 reply
I’m only talking about CS:GO and 16GB for gaming is for most games perfect
2020-11-26 21:55
new cpu for gaming? ryzen 5600X it is. everything else makes only sense if you have a strict budget.
2020-11-24 22:43
#92
 | 
United States TopBaiter
i7 10700 and gtx 970
2020-11-24 22:44
#100
 | 
Finland N0iZ
I5 10600k and 2080 super easily 400+ fps mostly somewhere around 400-500 fps
2020-11-25 08:45
#104
 | 
United Kingdom joaot
AMD 9 5950X & RTX 3090
2020-11-25 09:41
Ryzen 3 3300x + 1660 super
2020-11-25 10:09
CPU: Intel i5-8600k GPU: EVGA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB SC GAMING ACX 2.0 Average around 350+ fps
2020-11-25 10:16
2 replies
no way it doesnt drop under 350. First 1060 is pretty old gpu and when there is a lot of smokes, it will drop to 200 or even lower in site execution. Second i have seen streamers with that specs have 230fps average.
2020-11-25 12:21
1 reply
Exactly, streamers. Run it without a stream eating your GPU/CPU power :) Maybe it does drop to 250 in the smokes, but really it's not something you can notice.
2020-11-25 17:18
You will never be sure of 300+ fps whatever the gear. If you join dm with 24 players, you will most likely drop to 200 or even lower sometimes, even if its rare. In 5v5 that is a different story, my i7 10700k @5ghz never drops below 250 in .1% lows, with average to 400-500. All in all, 300+ fps in csgo is almost unachievable in all scenarios. PS: GPU is rtx 2080 super
2020-11-25 10:22
R3 3300x if you can find one and dont think you will need 6 cores and a 1650 super
2020-11-25 10:37
3800x and rx580 csgo is cpu heavy and my friend has ~400-600fps at any time because the cpu is that good.
2020-11-25 10:43
R3 3100 5500 XT should be enough
2020-11-25 10:44
300 fps does not matter anyways.. your CPU is sending 300 fps to a monitor who only can show up to 240fps (if you have a 240hz monitor)
2020-11-25 13:13
6 replies
#168
 | 
Morocco royflord
Pepega is a BTTV emote that is commonly used on Twitch. ... According to many, Pepega is a politically correct way of saying “retard.” The emote is most commonly used on Twitch and in Forsen's subreddit.
2020-11-25 15:17
5 replies
ok morocco. Do you even have access to pc's?
2020-11-25 15:41
4 replies
#178
 | 
Morocco royflord
ignorant, mad and stupid.. damn we've got the jackpot here
2020-11-25 15:44
3 replies
we've = we have. We have got the jackpot here. nice england
2020-11-25 15:46
2 replies
#182
 | 
Morocco royflord
dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british.. Kid, ignorant, mad and stupid with no education. What happened to Denmark ?
2020-11-25 15:50
1 reply
You started by posting a very childish reply - actually a very strange one also. Explain?
2020-11-25 16:00
I have i5-9600KF, it's good processor. 450 fps mirage, 300-350 fps other maps
2020-11-25 13:17
2 replies
But i does not matter if your monitor can't handle those fps.. 240hz can handle up to 240 fps
2020-11-25 15:42
1 reply
Yes it does matter to have a CPU that can run 400 fps steadily instead of having a CPU that reaches for 240 fps.
2020-11-25 16:41
dont forget when running fps benchmark there is massive difference running it 64 tick vs 128 tick. so when people compare their results they may not have the same launch options. dm server current player count impacts fps even one player makes difference
2020-11-25 14:03
1 reply
+1, running the fps benchmark at 128 tick is braindead.
2020-11-27 21:04
#153
 | 
Europe vrx10
I have 3700x+16gb 3200mhz and rtx3070 and its smooth
2020-11-25 14:30
#154
 | 
Latvia kamixx
1280x960 average 250fps in dm or more and in game its similar, fps benchmark map 340fps 2600x and 1650super 1% low is like 130, 125fps it should be higher
2020-11-25 14:30
2 replies
1% low 130 is unplayable.
2020-11-26 14:49
1 reply
#261
 | 
Latvia kamixx
yes but it is what it is 2600x is not the best cpu for csgo lmao
2020-11-26 20:46
I swear i have no idea what kids are doing with their PCs lol but i have r3600+2060 and it never drops under 300 FPS People have like pc for 3-4k and run 200 FPS xD...
2020-11-25 14:33
#157
 | 
Brazil ztnnn
Ryzen 2000 = trash, pls dont buy Ryzen 3600X / i5 10600k 1650ti (I prefer Gigabyte version because he is OC)
2020-11-25 14:38
2 replies
#217
cArn | 
Ukraine Nzr0
says ryzen 2xxx is trash while has 1650ti lol
2020-11-26 00:05
1 reply
#267
 | 
Brazil ztnnn
I say that because I have 2700x
2020-11-26 22:38
No matter how many FPS your computer produce, your screen only shows 240 of them. Ergo, you can physically not see the difference of 300 or 500 fps. If the computer at times nails below 240 Hz, then it will be something that can be felt. all this is if you in fact have a 240hz monitor
2020-11-25 14:42
11 replies
#165
 | 
Canada JC_123
yeah for 240hz, 350fps is basically ideal anything more than that is wasted. Now those new 360hz monitors on the other hand...
2020-11-25 14:48
10 replies
It migth show 350 FPS, but you will only see 240 of them with a 240hz monitor. If you have a 144hz monitor, you will only see 144 FPS, even if your pc produce alot more. But yes, with a 360hz monitor you could have 360 FPS.
2020-11-25 14:52
2 replies
#188
 | 
Canada JC_123
I know that trust me lol, but a higher framerate still reduces perceived latency because the latest frame that your GPU sent is the one that is displayed by your monitor. To visualize this imagine a timeline with 240 marks per second (monitor) and another timeline with a variable number of frames per second but lets say like 300+ fps: | | | | | | | | | | | | monitor: | | | | | | | | The "fps" tick immediately before the "monitor" tick will be the frame that is displayed. Notice that there are gaps sometimes in time between the frame being rendered and the monitor displaying it. What if there were more fps? FPS: |||||||||||||||||| monitor: | | | | | | | | Now notice the gaps are very small this is probably what 400fps at 240hz would look on a timeline. This is why even for example at 60hz why >>100fps feels so much more responsive than 61 fps. anyways long story short, I think the latency reductions up to 350fps on 240hz is good but beyond that its not noticeable at all.
2020-11-25 16:51
1 reply
I am thanking you for whoever thought 240 hz = 240 fps is enough
2020-11-26 14:51
short: your graphic card puts out 240fps, but the screen can only render 144 if you have 144hz monitor Even if you have more fps, the monitor wont do anything with them as it only updates 144 times per second. if your gpu produces more fps than you screen can handle, some pictures will be skipped and you get the sometimes a bit ugly effect, known as “tearing”. but more fps than hz will also decrease your input lag (which means you can pull your gun in game a tiny tiny split second faster). So more fps than hz is maybe not the most beautiful thing, but gives you still an advantage in competitive situations.
2020-11-25 14:54
1 reply
#189
 | 
Canada JC_123
correct mens)) your last paragraphs is why I say 350fps best see #188
2020-11-25 16:52
why is 350 ideal for a 240??????????????? xD
2020-11-25 19:41
4 replies
#212
 | 
Canada JC_123
diminishing returns
2020-11-25 19:46
3 replies
350 is not ideal. more is always better
2020-11-26 00:13
2 replies
#231
 | 
Canada JC_123
#212 at 240hz the difference in latency between 350 and say 450fps should be less than 1ms on average. You'd do better to buy a mouse with less latency on the buttons than to upgrade CPU to like a $300 5600x for 100 more fps Unless you're on 360hz you would have to be some sort of superhuman to tell the difference between steadyish 350fps and steadyish 450+ fps
2020-11-26 06:49
1 reply
That is true. The fastest mice out there actually have a latency around 13-15 miliseconds. But you can't do anything about that, however you can get more fps to get slightly more advantage over others. If it's worth giga extra money is up to everybody.
2020-11-26 14:53
Just bought an i5 10600kf for 180€ on aliexpress, now i'm praying
2020-11-25 15:21
5 replies
#249
 | 
Portugal CRMN1
What's your GPU?. I'll buy a 10600K very soon,would appreciate feedback
2020-11-26 16:52
4 replies
an old i7 3770k
2020-11-26 20:29
3 replies
#263
 | 
Portugal CRMN1
GPU?
2020-11-26 20:51
2 replies
right now i'm using a gtx 1070 but a 1080ti is waiting which i got on ebay
2020-11-27 12:59
1 reply
#285
 | 
Portugal CRMN1
1080 is pretty good. You might get 400< fps with that setup I guess
2020-11-27 18:19
#172
 | 
Sweden daddyfalt
5600x + 3060ti '' coming in 3 weeks aprox but good luck finding stock ''
2020-11-25 15:29
me looking at comments with my 800x600 res 65 fps avg in faceit 75hz 5ms
2020-11-25 15:48
2 replies
#190
 | 
Canada JC_123
mens((((( hopefully one day soon parts like i5 6400 or r5 1400 from office computers will be affordable where you are
2020-11-25 16:54
1 reply
LOL
2020-11-26 15:43
#198
 | 
Poland jakubyku
i've got 200-350 fps (depends on map) on ryzen 3 1200 af + rx 570 on 1280x1024
2020-11-25 17:41
#201
 | 
Iraq NIAMZWER
literally any new cpu and gpu... by new I mean not latest realease but like new you know
2020-11-25 17:44
4 replies
#202
 | 
Iraq NIAMZWER
r5 3600x gtx 1060 + for example
2020-11-25 17:44
3 replies
1650 super > 1060 3 or 6 gb in csgo man
2020-11-25 18:26
2 replies
lol 1650S used = 140€ 1060 used= 80€
2020-11-26 00:21
1 reply
1060 6 gb in indonesia is more expensive than 1650 super :((((
2020-11-26 08:29
#203
 | 
New Zealand Karre127
i5 9600k with a 1660 super, buy Z390-A motherboard to make it work and there you go 300 fps constantly
2020-11-25 17:48
2 replies
+1 or 1660ti
2020-11-26 20:49
1 reply
#265
 | 
New Zealand Karre127
yeah 1660ti can work as well. +1
2020-11-26 21:33
hardwaredealz.com/bester-gaming-pc-fuer-.. For 700 euro 320fps at fullhd or higher res.
2020-11-25 19:46
5 replies
I doubt it
2020-11-26 00:19
1 reply
no it works
2020-11-26 06:50
lmfao germany scamming
2020-11-26 14:54
2 replies
wat
2020-11-26 19:24
No bro they are putting the best pc for every price category
2020-11-30 17:14
I3 9100F/R2600. RX 580/1650S
2020-11-26 06:48
1040 f+1660 super/ti
2020-11-26 14:51
i7 7gen and 1070/80 min. 300 on all maps
2020-11-26 16:46
#255
 | 
Portugal CASOTA
10400F + 1660S
2020-11-26 19:58
10400f+2060
2020-11-27 13:02
1 reply
top za svoi dengi
2020-11-28 22:16
ryzen 3 3100 + gtx 1650s ı3-10100f + rx 580
2020-11-27 13:06
#278
ZywOo | 
India aR__
I have r3 3100 Overclocked to 4300 mhz and a gtx 1060 6gb(Buying RTX 2070 super soon) and I get more than 300 FPS ALL THE TIME. Doesn't drop less than 240. Works perfect with my 144hz monitor.
2020-11-27 13:22
4 replies
#281
 | 
Morocco royflord
i'd consider upgrading the cpu if i were you, the 1060 is fine for cs and the new ryzen gen is insane, unless you're planning to play other games than cs
2020-11-27 13:53
3 replies
#283
ZywOo | 
India aR__
I just upgraded to r3 3100 from r3 2200G, I beat r5 2600 in gaming with oc
2020-11-27 18:06
#284
ZywOo | 
India aR__
This CPU is fine. 4 cores and 8 threads, enough for my 1080p resolution. Can handle upto rtx 2080, I'm fine.
2020-11-27 18:06
1 reply
#286
 | 
Morocco royflord
i'm just saying that if you play cs only i'd rather get a new cpu than the rtx 2070, i'm not saying it's a bad cpu
2020-11-27 18:32
Ryzen 5 5600x The King of csgo CPU. Constant 400-500fps or even higher.
2020-12-12 07:18
#294
 | 
Denmark Kondrup
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Or... AMD Ryzen 7 5800X. With a ASUS TUF-RTX3070-O8G-GAMING - NVIDIA RTX3070 - 8GB GDDR6.... 8x2 ram 3200 would that be a good csgo High fps computer?
2020-12-25 01:47
3 replies
5 5600x is perfect for csgo if ryzen then u need at least 3600mhz ram
2020-12-25 02:09
2 replies
#301
 | 
Denmark Kondrup
Sjat about rayzon 7 5800x would that be better then the 5?
2020-12-25 02:21
1 reply
yes but 5600x can easily get constant 450-600fps so is it really neccessary to have even more with ryzen 7 5800x? look here youtube.com/watch?v=4PRS4K-k6nU and he plays on dm with 16-18 players and fps never dropped below 350fps
2020-12-25 02:24
if you got 60hz monitor its worthless
2020-12-25 01:49
i9 10900k 3090 you will 100% get locked 300fps
2020-12-25 02:02
5 replies
No one smart will buy i9 10900k with 3090. Ryzen 5800x is the king
2020-12-25 04:11
4 replies
LUL people that have money and only want to game will buy the 10900k, amd is only good if you do other shit other than gaming
2020-12-25 17:48
3 replies
Yeah if they want worse fps, sure dude.
2020-12-26 03:08
2 replies
2020-12-26 16:31
1 reply
Grats, you linked 3900x which is terrible for gaming. Find me one for 5800x and 5600x :)
2020-12-27 09:02
#299
 | 
Denmark Kondrup
144hz and i know the 3090 but the Price is 1000 dollor or so but that ryson 7 5800x is that a good gamer
2020-12-25 02:05
i7 6700k amd radeon 480 8gb
2020-12-25 03:31
#308
 | 
Asia Blitzer
amd ryzen 5 3600 - best value cpu on the market rx 580 / rx 570 / rx 5500 xt / gtx 1650 super - if you only play csgo, with low settings, an entry-level gpu is more than enought
2020-12-25 04:14
1 reply
#317 i have benchmarked it i5 9400f performs 3% better
2020-12-25 18:39
#314
 | 
Denmark giefleve
Been saying this for a year! don't get ryzen 3600 for cs, there's a chance you will get more input lag than acceptable (depending on the unit). Intel is much more reliable when it comes to that. You can get 280+ fps consistently with i3 9100f if you spend an hour configuring everything. Anything better than i3 9100f will definitely get you 300+ fps so if you got the money go for it. Just don't go for ryzen 3600, dudes will say the input lag is the same but the just reddit losers.
2020-12-25 18:00
DONT EVER BUY Ryzen5 3600 when there is i5 9400f for legit cheaper price and better performance.
2020-12-25 18:37
2 replies
#324
 | 
Estonia Eduzera
Outdated CPU
2020-12-30 07:02
1 reply
both 1 year old wtf
2020-12-30 10:19
my pc gets really good fps. 1650 super i5 9400f might be a bit outdated, not sure...
2020-12-26 16:32
ryzen 3600 or ryzen 2700x nvidia gtx 1650 Enough
2020-12-30 07:06
#327
 | 
Oceania sergei_
getting 500 fps on 1024 with 3700x+1060
2020-12-30 07:25
i need some help too i have the same problem i posteda topic but i cant cause it says im nota ctive
2021-01-04 03:10
I have 3700x/2060s and I have 300+ with a 1% low fluctuating between 200 and 250. Got around the same result with a Vega 56, but I don’t think this info gonna help you that much
2021-01-08 05:57
Vitality
1.44
Liquid
2.95
AGF
2.12
Lyngby Vikings
1.72
SJ
2.62
Young Ninjas
1.45
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.