Thread has been deleted
Last comment
2020-11-27 15:40
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
2020-11-27 15:41 seems like a legit und trustworthy source to retweet.
2020-11-27 15:41
19 replies
Trump's twitter would be about the same on that chart, so doesn't surprise me.
2020-11-27 16:07
mediabias created by the clintons
2020-11-27 16:22
10 replies
CIS cardison
mediabias created by the clintons and has 1 dedicated editor that struggles to provide compensation to volunteer editors ?? yes men makes perfect sense
2020-11-27 17:32
9 replies
lol cause no one cares about it, clown news network is behind CARTOONS with massive debts that rich ppl like sorrows has to provide lol
2020-11-27 18:00
8 replies
CIS cardison
the site only started becoming active after hillary lost 2016 election .. u are not very smart bro
2020-11-27 18:53
7 replies
lol what on earth has that to do.. its utter garbage that got 0 atention and money problems like most msm who get a lot of injections to survive cause ppl are getting tired of getting told what to think from ppl who shouldnt take sides and do objective reporting
2020-11-27 19:07
6 replies
CIS cardison
if clintons made the site ... why would they wait until after election to use it .... that makes no fucking sense men
2020-11-27 19:08
5 replies
lol they they created cause they are the kkk party who steal elections for over 100+ years, they destroy inercities and joe biden was the one made the law to encarcerate black ppl from jail that trump had to undo with the 1st step act to undo it, trump pardoned many black former boxers who were encarcerated he pardoned the niece of mlk who said hes the best president ever for black cominities with the record unemployent for blacks and hispanics and he rebuit the black schools but ppl dont do reach and vote for biden cause they are stupid milinials lol
2020-11-27 19:17
4 replies
CIS cardison
idk why i even spent time argue with you , go take ur medication bro
2020-11-27 19:26
3 replies
loool typical left...
2020-11-27 19:27
2 replies
CIS cardison
if u had a point you wouldnt have to go on a rant about something i didnt ask about at all , go smoke ur qanon flavored vape
2020-11-27 19:30
1 reply
smoke my qanon flavored vape.... lol ok kid
2020-11-27 19:34
are you always coming around with that website? swear I have seen almost this exact convo before. deja vu lol
2020-11-27 17:13
3 replies
of course
2020-11-27 17:14
such a good argument finisher tho.
2020-11-27 17:34
1 reply
well the website is not the most trust worthy in itself imo, but yeah OANN is utter garbage.
2020-11-27 17:35
2020-11-27 17:40
Even an extreme BIAS can't deny facts. If what that man claimed is true, then something must be done. What we can't do is: I'm gonna disregard any claims of an individual because a biased news station covered it. Because a right (in this case) biased news outlet reporting it, has the same value as a left biased news outlet NOT reporting it...
2020-11-27 19:06
1 reply
2020-11-27 19:45
Romania Anonym20
2020-11-27 15:43
coming legends
2020-11-27 15:44
old man yells at cloud
2020-11-27 15:47
1 reply
Spain N0Love
2020-11-27 16:19
imagine having this idiot as president
2020-11-27 15:47
64 replies
Wait until January lmao.
2020-11-27 15:56
my president is a mix of donald trump and rodrigo duterte so everything can be worse
2020-11-27 15:58
1 reply
Lmao mens for real? XD
2020-11-27 16:15
i'd much rather have him as the president of US than Biden.
2020-11-27 16:01
60 replies
Then you are probably an idiot
2020-11-27 16:04
59 replies
u are, sorry
2020-11-27 16:22
2020-11-27 17:09
55 replies
Why? You tell me why you would rather want to have Trump as pres.
2020-11-27 21:29
54 replies
He is a great president (but a horrible rhetoric) and the things Joe Biden says he would do should be scary to Americans (even though i don't personally get affected by it, i don't think banning fracking in the US will have a good effect on the world economy, also the fact that he will "make the US re-enter the paris climate agreement" is just dumb).
2020-11-27 22:09
53 replies
He will ban fracking? Source?
2020-11-27 22:13
52 replies
3 replies
That doesn't prove anything.
2020-11-27 23:01
2 replies
The proof is what came out of Joe Biden's mouth, i can search the video for you if you promise to not respond by saying "oH wElL iT'S fRoM tRUmP i GueSs he jUsT faKeD iT"
2020-11-27 23:03
1 reply
2020-11-27 23:04
Joe Biden saying that he will ban fracking was the reason why PA almost flipped red, so good job on his part
2020-11-27 22:36
31 replies
Guide on how to make millions of Americans go jobless IN THE MIDST OF A "PANDEMIC" - Joe Biden
2020-11-27 22:39
Joe Biden never said he would ban fracking?
2020-11-27 23:00
29 replies
oh he didn't? then explain why trump literally fact-checked him after the last presidential debate and why polls made PA and other states shift red right after trump published the video on him saying it on MULTIPLE occations that he would do so.
2020-11-27 23:02
28 replies
27 replies
That does not prove anything, Biden very clearly said "we will make sure it's eliminated" AS WAS SAID IN THE ARTICLE and now because he realizes that he literally committed political suicide, he is trying to clean up the mess he created by stating "we're not gonna ban it just not give them any subsidies anymore"
2020-11-27 23:05
26 replies
Biden said very clearly: "WE WILL NOT BAN FRACKING" multiple times.
2020-11-27 23:07
25 replies
oh yeah? multiple times, sure, maybe after when he said "We will make sure it is eliminated" Sure, it is a good thing he changed his opinion, but what is said is said, and that surely had an effect on the election aswell. It was supposed to be a landslide for Biden, turns out, it wasn't.
2020-11-27 23:09
19 replies
Eliminate fracking over years =/= ban fracking Is that really hard to understand?
2020-11-27 23:11
18 replies
The thing is though he will never be able to get it eliminated over the years, what he needs is to eliminate it immediately so that it doesn't possibly fall victim to filibustering Biden knows this, and wanted to ban it, but obviously he would not state that he'd ban it, that would make it even worse. "“Just to clarify, would there be any place for fossil fuels, including coal and fracking, in a Biden administration?” Bash said. “No, we would — we would work it out. We would make sure it's eliminated and no more subsidies for either one of those, either — any fossil fuel,” Biden said in response." try to find the "Eliminate fracking over years" in here
2020-11-27 23:14
17 replies
Source? When did Biden say he wanted to "ban" fracking?
2020-11-27 23:16
16 replies
ban = eliminate Definition of eliminate: completely remove or get rid of (something). "a policy that would eliminate inflation"
2020-11-27 23:18
15 replies
BAN = to forbid (= refuse to allow), make it illegal ELIMINATE = to remove or take away someone or something HOW IS THAT THE SAME? HOW BIASED ARE YOU?
2020-11-27 23:23
14 replies
Ok hold up So if i ban something, it still removes the thing + makes it illegal If i eliminate something, it removes it Sure, you could argue that someone might re-establish fracking after Joe Biden supposedly eliminates it, but the point still stands. And i am the one who is biased? Come on.
2020-11-27 23:25
13 replies
Oh my... Just please read this. Banning would be "Yeah you can't use fracking anymore. It's banned now." How is that the same as eliminating it over the years? Jesus.
2020-11-27 23:28
12 replies
#90 Try to find the "Over the years" in that sentence, or in any of them. That's right, there is none. He said eliminate, so i assume he meant to eliminate it immediately when he gets into office. If not, hmm, a bit better, but not that good anyways.
2020-11-27 23:29
11 replies
There is no BAN sentence anywhere either. What i meant with "over the years" - he wants to make american to become a 100% clean energy and zero emission nation. NOT OVER NIGHT. You can't just "ban" the fracking or coal industry over night. Biden knows that and everyone else knows that, don't be delusional.
2020-11-27 23:41
10 replies
Yes i certainly know what "over the years" means. And yes i certainly know that a ban cannot be done over night, but it can certainly be done through an executive order which he would likely do if it wasn't for the fact that A) he probably changed his opinion B) Republican majority senate. Anyways, man, i still hold on to the belief that Biden wanted to ban fracking, but that he changed his policy on it recently. Whether if it's true or not, it is still good for America. Still though, to claim Trump was 100% a bad president and that Biden is 100% a good president is just ignorance, and so is calling people who disagree as idiots.
2020-11-27 23:46
9 replies
So you believe that Biden wants to ban fracking even though there is no evidence that he plans to do so. Got it.
2020-11-27 23:47
8 replies
I said he wanted, not that he does so now. I've said this over and over, but at this point, it doesn't really matter.
2020-11-27 23:48
7 replies
He said he wanted to ban fracking but you obviously don't have a clip or tape of him doing so. It's fine.
2020-11-27 23:49
6 replies Is this a good enough of an clip?
2020-11-27 23:52
5 replies
Are you joking? First of all he still NEVER SAID HE WANTS TO BAN FRACKING NOT EVEN IN THIS VIDEO LMAO .Secondly, why do rightists always link out of context and cut clips. You can't be serious.
2020-11-27 23:55
4 replies Ok sorry then, if banning does not mean still eliminating the fracking industry while illegializing it. Got it.
2020-11-27 23:56
3 replies
I find it hilarious that you say right-wingers usually cut out clips without context, when the left wing media does it all the time.
2020-11-27 23:57
I'm done here. There is no hope for fact-denying people like you.
2020-11-27 23:57
1 reply
Haha sure, thanks for the argument though had a great time!
2020-11-27 23:57
Australia z3ro_
Yes and im pretty sure that ive heard him say that he will ban it
2020-11-27 23:12
4 replies
Cool. Source?
2020-11-27 23:13
3 replies
Australia z3ro_
lol i said i was pretty sure so i dont know for sure and I don't have much time so I just pulled the first youtube link I could find. Edit: nvm i read above where you talk about eliminating =/= banning lol so idk
2020-11-27 23:20
2 replies
alternatively you could have pulled the video from Trump's channel but he would cry that "It is from Trump"
2020-11-27 23:19
Did you watch the video? Are you kiding me?
2020-11-27 23:20
LOL @ source he said it in the debate and multiple times in interviews and then tried to say he didnt say it
2020-11-27 23:38
15 replies
lol im still waiting for a source
2020-11-27 23:41
14 replies
6 replies
2020-11-28 00:01
5 replies
well isnt that what were talking about eliminating fracking?
2020-11-28 00:02
4 replies
we are talking about a BAN
2020-11-28 00:03
3 replies
would never pass even if he did tbh
2020-11-28 00:03
2 replies
Of course it wouldn't pass even if he did plan to ban it on his first day. It's not realistic.
2020-11-28 00:06
1 reply
2020-11-28 00:07
hes said it multiple times
2020-11-27 23:59
6 replies
Yeah he said multiple times that he won't BAN fracking. Never said he is going to ban it.
2020-11-28 00:02
5 replies
well him getting rid of fracking is the whole point
2020-11-28 00:03
4 replies
He wants to get rid of all fossile fuels by 2050, just like most western countries. He will never ban fracking, he will just not subsitute it.
2020-11-28 00:05
3 replies
well tbh he is just pandering for votes he wouldn't get rid of it anyways that's why I don't like him. He will say anything to get votes.
2020-11-28 00:06
2 replies
Oh that's true. Typical politican.
2020-11-28 00:07
1 reply
yea thats why i was fine with trump dont like him as a person but i thought he was ok with most of what he did
2020-11-28 00:10
Expected from capitalist hating Russian who too scared to show flag.
2020-11-27 18:56
lool typical left, then you dont know shit and you should do some iner thinking and some reseach budy
2020-11-27 19:55
lol why tf would that person come out 3 weeks later.Looks like a desperate hoax to me
2020-11-27 15:58
Big news
2020-11-27 16:06
china top 1 world 2021 confirmed
2020-11-27 16:09
2 replies
Spain N0Love
Still shit at CS so doesnt matter
2020-11-27 16:20
1 reply
right like spain
2020-11-28 00:01
They found Zywoo's USB key ?
2020-11-27 16:21
2020-11-27 16:21
Finland Kaffe_cup
source: trust me bro, it's really happening I swear
2020-11-27 16:23
If this was true, biden would have 1.1 million votes. Pretty unlikely. A low even for trumps standards.
2020-11-27 16:28
5 replies
2020-11-27 17:20
bro, I think your calculator is broken
2020-11-27 17:22
If this was tru, biden would have 1.1 million LESS votes. I think you forget the "less"
2020-11-27 19:58
2 replies
no, i meant in pennsylvania. biden would have 1.1 million, trump 3.3 million. he would have won by 50 points.
2020-11-27 20:42
1 reply
Oh, my bad then. It does seems unlikely. But they should investigate anyways.
2020-11-27 20:45
Name checks out.
2020-11-27 17:12
trust me bro
2020-11-27 17:22
Russia SW@G_2
biden used word.exe?
2020-11-27 17:22
2020-11-27 17:28
Lmao hahahaahah nt
2020-11-27 17:34
"This claim about election fraud is disputed" Expected lmao
2020-11-27 17:35
2020-11-27 17:35
Russia NOD777
Where are usbs mr biden?
2020-11-27 17:39
United States Phamous3k
Trump lol.
2020-11-27 18:07
floppy | 
Netherlands WDJ6
ever since a saw a youtube video where a person at a trump rally blamed obama for 9/11 for 'not being in the office but always on vacation' i stopped caring about all this election shit in general
2020-11-27 20:48
low iq bots can't accept that they LOST! LOLOLOLOLOL. #sorelosers
2020-11-27 20:57
Enjoy the AKA Hollywood movie. You guys are tricked
2020-11-27 21:32
Dictator Trump back at It!
2020-11-27 21:33
BIG NEWS: Area 51 Conspiracy Watcher: Flying Sourcers captured in military bases, found thousands of aliens inside. Says 47 flying saucers are now missing. EVERY SAUCER HAD 50,000 ALIENS. @HLTV
2020-11-27 22:45
So many accusations and no evidence of fraud, guy is a joke
2020-11-27 23:08
hah, this is the news source he cites
2020-11-28 00:06
2020-11-28 01:12
FunPlus Phoenix
Evil Geniuses
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Odds total ratio
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.