Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Most people know that CSGO is a game that doesn't use many cores or threads - this will boost your fps on ryzen. By limiting the amount of cores CSGO can use, you can increase your fps. I have a ryzen 5 1600 @3.8Ghz and in the FPS benchmark map I got 205 FPS, after I got 330.
Instructions:
1. Download Process Lasso, which will keep your core affinity set permanently, unlike task manager where you will have to manually change the core affinity every time.
2. All you need to do is select which cores to enable for csgo in process lasso. For ryzen 3: enable 3 and 4, for ryzen 5: enable 6,8,10. For ryzen 7, enable 8,10,12,14.
The reason why this works is because it doesn't allow your CPU to use cores on csgo that are already being used to perform background tasks, so the cores that are running csgo for you are completely dedicated to running csgo, not anything else.
Here is a video of a guy explaining this: youtube.com/watch?v=RiPU5u3IxY8
8 replies
5 replies
7 replies
nope
You're smarter than 99% of hltv.
1 reply
7 replies
5 replies
4 replies
not for me, never had any sort of spike with my ryzen 5 3600
3 replies
2 replies
msi b450 A-pro max
but cs is also unstable, i had an intel i7-6700 for 3 years, in the 1rst year everything was good but in the second i was getting fps drops in 5m-5m and then one day i moved cs to different disk and the drops stopped, and i dont know why, and iwas getting this bad performance only in cs
i have r5 1600 and got about 250fps on that benchmark map. will try this tip, thx.
btw, do you have 2 ram sticks or 1? bc i had 1 ram stick and after got second, my fps went up by like 70-90. before 2 sticks i averaged like 150fps on maps
7 replies
1 reply
Ryzen CPUs (except Threadrippers) can't work in quad-channel mode, so having more RAM sticks won't boost performance.
Here is the list of CPUs that support quad-channel mode -en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-channel_memo..
4 replies
sadly it didn't help me at all, ig its different for everyone
3 replies
8 replies
4 replies
Ryzen 5 3500/3500X only have 6 cores, and no SMT (no extra threads).
3 replies
2 replies
If you disabled CPPC option(s) in BIOS then you can try to uncheck 0,1,2. But actually you don't really need to do anything, you should be fine since your CPU has no SMT anyway.
30 replies
Intel processors are better optimized for csgo and they have less cores. This method works well on ryzen because it forces your cpu to only use a limited amount of cores, which actually works better due to csgo's reliance on just a few fast cores. If csgo was optimized for lots of cores than this method would be useless.
29 replies
Intel CPUs aren't optimized for CS:GO.
CS:GO just uses old engine which have better performance at 3 fast cores and can't use multi-core (6, 8 or more) advantage.
> This method works well on ryzen because it forces your cpu to only use a limited amount of cores
Wrong. It forces CS:GO to use physical cores instead of physical cores + virtual threads.
You could achieve the same result without Process Lasso, by setting SMT off in BIOS/UEFI.
27 replies
26 replies
I didn't say you should disable SMT, I just explained where fps boost comes from: using physical cores only instead of physical cores + virtual threads.
25 replies
24 replies
How is it feels being forced to disable cores and threads that were paid off by you?
23 replies
Setting affinity to certain cores for certain application =/= disabling cores or threads. You can still use these cores/threads with other applications. CS:GO uses 3 threads by default btw.
22 replies
It is disabling. You can do it by disabling SMT also, you will get some extra +1-2 fps in other games on DX12 either.
21 replies
1 reply
You can do it for other games also, in BIOS.
You will get some extra performance (1-2%) and less power consumption. Great job AMD))))
Are you dumb or baiting?
Disabling SMT will lead to the same result as setting affinity to only physical cores and vice versa, but it's not necessary to disable anything in BIOS.
Personally I don't use SMT on my gaming PC though. Not even because of performance but because of latency. And I would have done the same if I were using Intel CPU.
18 replies
You're the dumb one.
It's not necessary but it's better than SMT ON, cuz you will have extra performance and less power consumption. AMD just pulled more cores for dumbs like you that will run to buy theirs product because of some cores, while Intel users will have 6C\6T and have more fps than you.
11 replies
I doubt SMT has significant impact on power usage, as I said I have SMT disabled but I didn't notice any "extra" performance nor less power consumption. Provide reliable proofs for that (benchmarks, tests) or are you just bedroom-based theorist?
I don't care if somebody has more fps than me, I have more than enough.
10 replies
1. Check this out youtube.com/watch?v=R48tIXjQhT4
2. You're doomed from the start.
3. Check your VRM temperature on motherboard with SMT ON vs OFF, lamer.
9 replies
You can achieve the same result by just setting affinity.
My VRM, CPU, GPU, RAM, NVM-e and chipset temps are the same for SMT on/off.
8 replies
Aha aha, thanks for proving that btw.
7 replies
#96
Keep talking shit, noob.
6 replies
I said about proving, not about your shitty comments.
5 replies
You can say whatever you want, it's irrelevant anyway.
4 replies
Yeah? Same to you.
3 replies
Ok, thanks for your irrelevant opinion.
2 replies
Stop answering me, you're so annoying clown.
1 reply
Axaxaxa. Are you mad? Cuz I'm not.
You don't need to do the same on Intel cuz Intel has superior memory controller unlike AMD, didn't you know that?))))
5 replies
What does memory controller have to do with anything?
It's not about memory controller, it's about how HT/SMT works. Running CS:GO at virtual threads instead of physical cores only isn't good, doesn't matter if you're using Intel or AMD.
I see you're not only clueless in the topic, but also troll and baiter. I'm not gonna waste my time, bye.
4 replies
What does memory controller have to do with anything?
Ohh, i see, you're lamer, isn't you?) You was the one saying about latency and disabling SMT (okey okey, programming, okey), but looks like you didn't know that Intel's Ring Bus waaaay better than AMD's Infinity Fabric. It is because IF is shit you have to have 3400 mhz+ memory, disable SMT and other stupid things.
3 replies
What does all this shit have to do with running CS:GO on all threads with HT on?
Irrelevant.
2 replies
Your knowledges are irrelevant.
1 reply
Nice london.
1 reply
thanks, american friend.
>amd is good
>but only if you download this and that and that and this
don't be stupid buy a solid intel cpu for $20 more lol
18 replies
imgur.com/a/mo20JSd|
nt
He's obviously talking about the 3 year old CPUs
15 replies
still an irrelevant comparison
who tf needs more than 400 fps? nobody
14 replies
13 replies
360hz = 360 fps
529 more than enough
also amd is more expensive
12 replies
its more expensive because its a better product :^)
Keep in mind you only need a cheap B550 or B450 if you already have it to get the full capability while on intel you need to get the higher end chipset to OC or run RAM at decent speeds. You also don't need a very high end cooler to get the full capability.
hltv.org/forums/threads/2384853/cpugpu-3..
See #188 on this post if you want to learn why a higher framerate matters
8 replies
hf changing amd cpus every year cos they die lmao
7 replies
6 replies
ok ok poorkid
5 replies
4 replies
ok ok poorkid
3 replies
1 reply
ya you did
look at your flag it spells P O O R
have fun with your camels and aks
1 reply
10600K better by far, isn't it?ahahaha
Running CS:GO with HT enabled isn't good neither.
Well, these ppl are weird.
19 replies
AMD power))))) ahahaha
18 replies
17 replies
Yeeaah, so top1 that AMD CPU users trying to disable cores and threads while they have paid for them ahaha.
16 replies
5 replies
Yeah, it's so important in games))))))))))
Well, it's only natural to compare 10th gen to 5000 series while 10th gen is rival to 3000 series, and yeah, 10th destroyed 3000 series, didn't you know that? Only budget 3100 and 3300x maybe were good offers but they're gone since Intel realised 10100F that crush both of them.
4 replies
1 reply
10th gen are rivaling 3000 series.
10th gen didn't destroy shit
1 reply
Ofc it does.
only in CSGO because of dogshit engine
9 replies
It works even in other games if you disable SMT.
8 replies
The effect on other games is so miniscule it isnt worth it
7 replies
And you get less power consumption.
Extra performance + less power consumption, you need only to disable cores or threads ahaha, great job AMD)))
6 replies
Ok dude, I get it, you are an Intel fanboy lmao
5 replies
Have no arguments on conversation +
Need to escape +
Call someone intelboy after that +
Great Job, my AMD user friend!
4 replies
Its just that I skipped through this thread and saw your replies to other users, its actually hilarious how delusional (name checks out) and stuck up you are.
3 replies
Yeah yeah, of course, i'm intelboy, didn't you know that?)))))
Funny, how it is easy to claim someone silly name and say that he's delusional, while having 0 rights in discussion. Is that the way all AMD fans are following?
2 replies
I knew that mens))
Name checks out
Do I need to do this fam?
steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetai..
5 replies
Low res + 64 tick KEKW
4 replies
3 replies
Only kids say such nonsense.
2 replies
6 replies
wow i like this program thank you. i really needed it i was getting tired of micro managing on task manager, id like to mention that my fps is better keeping core 2 3 4 5 instead of 3 4 5 (ryzen 5 1600af)
despite being in another ccx the core has decent latency to the second triplet
Shouldnt it be every cpu but core "0"
At least what I did for 2200g
1 reply
I didn't notice any changes in fps after setting CS:GO affinity to "3-4-5" cores instead of "0-6" (all).
CS:GO uses 3 threads by default, so it should not be a problem.
its only beneficial on 1st and 2nd gen ryzens, or higher end newer parts where the cores are split up into more than 1 chiplet. :()
Wait but my ryzen 3 has 1-7 what should select?
2 replies
ryzen 2600 oc to 4.1
was 230
now 245
ty for tip
didnt try yet but i have same cpu as u and i love u for sharing this vid already
tried it, got + 20 fps on ryzen 5 2600 not bad wtf
15 replies
it has to do with the infinity fabric thats connecting the chiplets between ur cores. on a 2600 u have 3+3 cores on 2 different chiplets, and it creates some latency between them when they want to share resources, and CSGO is super finicky with that since its an old dx9 game. if valve would update go to use vulkan like they did with dota2 it would be pretty good for performance more than likely :()
7 replies
zen+ doesnt use chiplets, the cores are just separated
zen+ doesnt use chiplets, the cores are just separated
2 replies
yes my bad, ment the CCX, and afaik 2600 is 2x 4 core CCX with 1 core disabled on both connected thru the infi fabric no :()?
1 reply
yes you are right
Yep, in theory setting affinity for CS:GO to use only cores from the same CCX should be better for latency (and maybe overall performance), but that's not where fps improvement comes from. #96
2 replies
i did testing on my 3700X with process lasso on 1600x900 low, and the difference between 8c/16t, 8c/8t and 4c/4t using one CCX was in the 10 fps margin of error in run to run variance. Seems like this is more so helpful for 1xxx and 2xxx ryzens :()
1 reply
I haven't noticed any significant difference with 3600x neither, but I use it 6/6 (smt off) 24/7 since this PC is only for gaming and I have another PC for all other tasks.
You could buy 9400F and get way more fps, but you're doomed.
6 replies
I get enough
5 replies
Yeah yeah.
4 replies
I have 144hz monitor and I average 220 - 300 fps half the time 200 in dm and smokes
not a problem?
3 replies
No no bro, not a single problem, AMD is so better in CS GO!))))))
2 replies
Which cores to use for i5-7600K ??
1 reply
that i5 already has only 4 cores so only an overclock would help
5 replies
Intel in 2020 OMEGALUL.
4 replies
3 replies
What are your current CPU/MB?
2 replies
1 reply
You will have to change motherboard whether you upgrade to Ryzen or newer Intel.
i will try it when my 3700x arrive
AMD in 2020 ahahaha.
6 replies
How pathetic.
Educate yourself please <3
I feel bad for people like yourself because you have to fight over a company rather than the product. If you can use two eyes and half a brain cell you’d see Ryzen has been superior for 2 years now without a doubt but instead you stick to your brainless consumerism and buy the shinier box, ignoring the actual importance of what’s inside it.
2 replies
I feel bad for people like you cuz you have no eye for sure. Ryzen has been seriously inferior to Intel in games for last, emm...all the time, i guess. You only see brand, don't you?)
1 reply
So you’re 8 years old? And you’re stuck in q1 2020? Damn the consumerism is strong in this one?
23 replies
Great boost, but i guess 9600k or even 10400f is greater.
22 replies
21 replies
Yeah yeah, of course.
20 replies
19 replies
Yeah yeah, no offence bro, AMD is good))))))))))))))))))
18 replies
17 replies
Man, AMD is good, didn't you know that? Pls don't talk to me if you don't respect my choice, okey?
16 replies
15 replies
??? I only said that you have really great boost.
14 replies
13 replies
Man, why are you keep coming at me? Stop it right now! That's enough already :((
12 replies
ahah imagine being that psychofan of intel, your 4 last threads out of 9 are about how intel is better than amd, imagine caring about it that much, get over it, im gonna go and render another video 3x faster than with intel meantime, cant wait to see your another funny sarcastic answer
11 replies
Yeah yeah, go render some video. Also, 3600 is on 10700K level in rendering programs, didn't you know that?)))
By the way, are you some kind of youtuber? Can i get a link of your channel? Or i simply don't understand why you have to render some video, are you making same operations every day?))))
10 replies
9 replies
??? What do you mean? Maybe because Ryzen 5 3600 is on same level as 10700K in rendering?
8 replies
7 replies
Yeah, no problem at all mate. Btw can you send pls a link?
6 replies
5 replies
You know what? That's mean (. Ehh, always knew that AMD fans just want to smash others apart (((
4 replies
3 replies
Good luck bro, sad you didn't buy 3700x or 3950x while having such great earnings, but okey, i respect your choice anyway, cya, bye bye)))))))
2 replies
1 reply
Oh, so, you did by inferior 3600 just to show how bad intel cpus are? Hm, interesting, but wasn't i the one who told you about 3600 and 10700k render abilities?
intel>amd
2 replies
Yeah, paying for some extra cores\threads to disable them in future. Weird people, don't you think that?)))))
guyz, can u help me with warzone
i have i5 7400 gtx 1060 6gb 8gb ram and i get 40 - 60 with a bunch of freezes and stutters its not playable
im pretty sure that i should get more fps
i did a lot of things but nothing helped
what can i do?
1 reply
8 gb ram just isn't enough. You can have 3090 and i9, but who cares, if you have only 8 gb of ram.
nvm i have literally same cpu as you, gtx 1060 6gb
16gb 3333hz ram and no performance increase at all still way to laggy and unplayable
4 replies
Yeaah, AMD path.
3 replies
i seriously regret getting amd, my game is so laggy when i shoot i can't even adjust my crosshair
2 replies
Yeah, you better have Intel, the best CPUs.
1 reply
+1
mhmm 700+ fps in csgo benchmark with my 5800x...now i just need 3090 or 6900xt to become available without having to pay over price.
6 replies
>5800x
>3090
no overprice. hahaha, nice joke, bro!)
5 replies
Only paid 480 which is normal price for the 5800x...
3090 is indeed overpriced but if i cant get 6900 xt then i need to bite the bullet.
4 replies
Yeah yeah.
3 replies
?... what
2 replies
Nothing bro, congrats, enjoy your awesome CPU))))))
1 reply
what bout i7 8700
6 cores 12 threads
5 replies
Same level as new 5600x)))) Good job AMD))))
4 replies
3 replies
ahahaha, check tests with i7 8700k vs 5600x)))
2 replies
5600x even dominates the 10900k in CS. You are such an insane fanboy it's hilarious!
youtu.be/ip3u8hnKgvU?t=498
1 reply
Comparing 5000 series to 10th gen?) Such funny AMD fanboy) Why not compare your so top 5600x with huge overprice to old outdated 8700k?)
how do i get the autistic intel shill to reply to me
1 reply
I wonder if he is paid per comment or hourly
If you have a Ryzen 5000 series you won't be needing the extra performance anyways
3 replies
Can you buy 5000 series Ryzen? Are you a superhero or Lisa's brother? Are you James Huang?
2 replies
500/950 in queue for 5900x backorders xd
1 reply
Good luck then.
2 replies
Nice boost, maybe try Intel someday?)
1 reply
3 replies
Don't even try it, get Intel, why don't ya? Also, you can sell your set and buy 9100f and you will get better frames, so freaky, isn't?
2 replies
1 reply
It's joke bro.
thanks got 300 fps with my ryzen
3 replies
Greeeat, i guess you would have more frames even with i3 9100f ahahah
2 replies
are you genuinely autistic?
1 reply
Am i wrong?))))
1 reply
AMD)))
2 replies
Ofc it didn't, don't try to hesitate, buy Intel instead
1 reply
little to no difference for me
Will this make tabbing/ browsing and stuff slower?
1 reply
Of course it will.
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
