Well true, but the only really good game they've made is Witcher 3. Witcher 2 was decent but had a lot of issues, and the Witcher 1 was not only filled with bugs but also had a horrendous fighting system and looked horrible for its time.. just compare it to other releases around 2007.. there's no guarantee that they're on a linear scale where their games just gets better.
If anything, they've shown that they're really good at telling a story and engaging the players in the world of their game, and balancing fighting with looting and quests.. however that story is built on top of an already established, and cherished, series of books. This is their first time on their own.
People have a right to be sceptical, but there's just no telling how good the game actually is at this point.. it's just fanboys and trolls making comments about dev pictures.
I do think the point about graphics is silly though when you look at Witcher3. Barely anyone, if anyone, has done it better than their landscapes in an RPG.
One big positive is that fact that they've fixed every single major issue the W3 had years after launch. Much better rep on my account than most other game companies in that regard.