While small benefits cannot be excluded, we do not find significant benefits on case growth of more restrictive NPIs. Similar reductions in case growth may be achievable with less restrictive interventions. explanation: lockdowns dont work
"While small benefits cannot be excluded, we do not find significant benefits on case growth of more restrictive NPIs. Similar reductions in case growth may be achievable with less restrictive interventions."
like usernames represent ones age. it's not like "De-linquent" makes you look grown up – why would it – it's a username.
doublewhopper not being able to scroll down to a tldr (or not noticing because it's called "conclusion"), and then trying a low iq insult gives me more reason to believe he is 12 than any username here.
That would probably still require more study to be able to affirm for sure, but it definitely looks like that if you could guarantee that everyone would
work from home (whoever can) + use masks + speak at low volumes then quarantines would not be as necessary
varies by region. the 'plano são paulo' for instance states that depending on healthcare status and the trend of new cases/hospitalizations/deaths the commerce has to adjust accordingly
e.g. right now: lots of new cases and ICU capacity starting to be tested, most commerces can only function at 40% capacity and 8h/day with individual access control
of course that's all in theory though, during the end of the year cases were already going nuts but businesses were kept open