Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Are you pro-gun?
CIS xasthur 
Are you pro-gun? I am. I think every citizen should be able to keep a gun for protection. What are the gun laws in your country? "Guns Don't Kill People, People Kill People"
2021-01-27 10:42
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
usa is the example. No this law shouldnt exist
2021-01-27 10:45
22 replies
What a gross oversimplification.
2021-01-27 11:05
18 replies
bullshit, usa is literally the only country in the world where school shootings happen regularly
2021-01-27 11:17
16 replies
Another dumb oversimplification. There are a lot of systemic issues which cause this, it is not just one thing. Guns are legal in Switzerland, yet you never see nowhere near the same number of shootings. /close
2021-01-27 11:43
15 replies
Yet, swiss gun-related deaths are the highest in europe which perfectly proves my point
2021-01-27 12:36
13 replies
Big rekt
2021-01-27 13:19
No it doesnt, gun-related deaths and regular school shootings are 2 very different things.
2021-01-27 13:29
5 replies
bro start thinking, my answer is referring to the overall topic of gun laws not the topic school shootings. That was just an example of why guns shouldnt be legal
2021-01-27 14:04
3 replies
how can you counter that argument? "Almost every criminal/robber/thief/attacker/citizen who want to do some sort of harm (call it whatever you wanna call it) have some kind of gun from illegal source. How can I a loyal citizen defend myself against gunned citizen?"
2021-01-27 16:51
2 replies
Well its pretty fucking hard and expensive to get a gun on the black market. Lil timmy wont get one so easily if he needs 10000$ to buy one on the black market. On the other hand if he had 10000$, what are you angry about, u you got 10000$ buddy
2021-01-28 13:29
1 reply
#291
 | 
Brazil Nikoko
Top logic right here, obviously a great gun expert.
2021-01-28 21:41
+1
2021-01-27 14:20
Bruh moment
2021-01-27 13:32
/open So now you move the goal post from school shootings to ALL gun-related deaths. Amazing. I have zero problems if someone uses a gun to defend themselves. Those statistic are also counted in gun related deaths. What i care about is mindless shootings from deranged people which do not happen BECAUSE of guns being legal but because of multiple other factors. Not to mention guns being illegal don't stop mass shootings. We have nowhere near the same gun laws as USA in Norway, yet we had one of the most horrific mass shootings.
2021-01-27 14:17
4 replies
apparently you don't know shit about the issues that USA has.
2021-01-27 15:53
1 reply
In what way?
2021-01-28 21:54
+1
2021-01-27 16:18
#233
 | 
United States avestin
To be fair you guys had 1 bad mass shooting in 2011, since then the US has had like >10x bad mass shootings since then
2021-01-27 17:31
people have guns because of the mandatory military gives, they have no ammo though. Pro gun people always forget that part.
2021-01-27 14:16
yeah, the non-tard countries would do perfectly fine tbh
2021-01-27 16:59
R u fuk u?
2021-01-27 11:27
Yes, we should all be like the only country with regular mass shootings. Of all the countries that have gun legislation, you choose the only one that does it completely wrong. Better examples can include: Canada, Australia, Switzerland, Finland, the UK, Germany, New Zealand
2021-01-27 11:43
1 reply
#75
 | 
Germany DerBorgi
In Germany guns are illegal for regular people. You can get a small gun license ("kleiner Waffenschein") to carry alarm guns and pepper spray for humans, "real" guns are only possible if you have to carry them for work (Police, Army, hunting etc.).
2021-01-27 12:30
guns help people in killing people
2021-01-27 10:45
15 replies
So do knives and axes
2021-01-27 10:47
14 replies
but you can't have knife with a certain length in public, same with axe i think +it's easier to defend yourself when someone is attacking you with a knife than with a gun
2021-01-27 10:49
11 replies
My point is if someone wants to murder you, he will do it, wheter it's gun or knife. You should be able to shoot down every person, who enters your possesion without permission.
2021-01-27 10:56
8 replies
your 1st point is accurate but the 2nd one... no
2021-01-27 10:58
By your logic, we shouldn't prevent private citizens from owning nuclear weapons, since "if he wants to wipe out humanity, he will do it"
2021-01-27 11:44
5 replies
No he won't lmao Why would u compare fire arm with mass weapon
2021-01-27 12:02
4 replies
does the same thing, just on different scales.
2021-01-27 12:34
3 replies
you exaggerate scale just like every anti gun person.What he meant was if someone wnat to kill someone he will do it even with bare hands and dont need a gun to do it but if someone want to make nuclear desert he cant do it without nuke
2021-01-27 12:48
2 replies
It is a lot harder to kill someone with your bare hands than with a gun.
2021-01-27 12:50
1 reply
cant argue with that but its harder to defend yourself with bare hands against illegal gun/weapon (its not that hard to get it)
2021-01-27 12:53
rofl, there's quite a big difference between pulling a trigger and literally stabbing somebody. one is very easy to do, the other one is not.
2021-01-27 15:54
LOL "it's easier to defend yourself when someone is attacking you with a knife than with a gun" u dont need to pull the gun out of your pocket/holster/bag one good shot and attacker crawl on the ground in agony or lying and dying
2021-01-27 12:44
1 reply
i don't understand what you try to say in your comment, im just brainlagged, i just wanted to say that if someone attacked me on a street i would prefer to be attacked with knife than with a gun
2021-01-27 13:18
Knives and axes aid mentally ill people in killing, guns enable stupid people to do so aswell
2021-01-27 14:09
for knifes you need to get behind person to one click kill though
2021-01-27 19:06
#4
Bymas | 
Kuwait roye
most people dont need protection, do you really need a gun driing prius?
2021-01-27 10:45
Guns are bad. Stay pure.
2021-01-27 10:46
im progun prolife prochoice and prodeathpenalty
2021-01-27 10:46
4 replies
and pro-new-nip-logo as i see :/
2021-01-27 10:50
Based
2021-01-27 14:12
#165
 | 
Romania brasiI
by "pro-life" you mean you are against abortion ? k
2021-01-27 15:49
That was alot of "pro" oxymoron
2021-01-27 17:35
50k people are murdered every year on Brazil, i think giving more gun to a dumb population will not decrease these crimes. We need education, maybe then people will realize that they will live only 1 time and stop fucking their own life killing people
2021-01-27 10:48
2 replies
+1200000
2021-01-27 13:21
#148
 | 
Brazil 2de
We need education, yes, but not for "realizing" crime is bad, all criminals know what they are doing is wrong, the effect of education should be to create oportunity and not make crime so appealing to young poor people, but i guess our government isn't capable of doing so.
2021-01-27 14:44
yes i want to shoot in my garden
2021-01-27 10:50
The most prevalent reason for owning a firearm is because people don't want to be less powerful than the state. For example the reason the USA has legalized guns is because the individual must always hold enough power to ever overthrow the government or defend your self against it. Thus the second amendment saying that someone has "the right to bear arms". That's also not limited to guns either so technically in the future when a whole plethora of weapons are used people may own and use them all and in this way you can see that the second amendment does have basis behind it and i don't think anti-gun activists really understand this. However in reality a coup will never really be needed in places like the USA because most things can be resolved by the means of democracy. Personally i have no problem with guns as long as it is extremely hard to get one and not sold to anyone over 18.
2021-01-27 10:54
6 replies
My friend you write such an intelligent post and you end with don't sell to anyone over 18 hahaha
2021-01-27 17:02
This amendment was made a long time ago where guns were much less effective at killing people and the governmental weapons were quite similar. Nowadays this isn't the case, USA has an arsenal of missiles for the govt. It's stupid to say "give a gun to the people to protect you from the government" nowadays because a gun won't do jack shit against an army tank or a missile.
2021-01-27 17:09
4 replies
#238
 | 
Italy buduam
+1
2021-01-27 17:44
The whole entire force of America went into Afghanistan beginning in 2001 yet it is still on going. You would think that America would be able to wipe them out with such a powerful army, but they have not. Not to mention that Afghanistan has way smaller numbers and way less powerful military equipment. So your idea that the common citizens cannot come together if there were to be any tyranny is simply not true. Not to mention that there are millions of more American citizens, who can practice with firearms. Additionally, the size of America is millions of more square miles than Afghanistan, making it harder for the American government to track down anyone against the government. One last thing is that not every single person will be 100% loyal to the government. When joining the army or military, people take an oath to the Constitution, not the government. In short, saying the American government could quickly wipe out the America people is highly unlikely.
2021-01-27 18:31
2 replies
Completely different environments, there is a very high population density in your cities for example. You can be "against the government" and hide in whatever place you feel like, sure. But the guy I was replying to was talking about overthrowing the government or defending yourself against it. I don't believe having a gun makes you any more capable of stopping anything. Besides, I don't think tyranny would happen in the USA, if it did the govt wouldn't let guns stop them lol.
2021-01-27 18:42
1 reply
The whole point of a dictatorship is to control the people while the dictator and other high officials hold the power. If the government cannot hold any power over anyone, then it will just become a failure. So if many of the people had a weapon, the expenses that would be required for the American people to be controlled would be tremendous. In cities, they would have to find a way to control millions while there are plenty of guns in circulation (legally or illegally). It might be easy to contain them, but difficult to take direct control over each person. Out in the rural areas, it would take lots of time to find and locate small groups of people, which also would be wasteful. The most powerful dictators in history know the power of arming the population, take Hitler for example. He said the first way to conquer a nation is to disarm the people.
2021-01-27 19:20
#15
 | 
Finland Miroyev
All people shouldn't have guns. The issue with anti-gun policies is that in country like the US so many people already have guns it doesn't help much to restrict selling them from now on.
2021-01-27 10:57
4 replies
0/8 Imagine being a cuck to the government
2021-01-27 14:13
3 replies
like the government couldn't easily use a tank or even a missile instead, how is a gun going to defend you from that? lmao
2021-01-27 17:11
1 reply
it's gonna be funny seeing americans try to shoot at combat drones bombing them from the stratosphere
2021-01-27 17:33
#286
 | 
Finland Miroyev
lul -8/8 logic
2021-01-28 17:18
definitely not fact anyone even asks is so dumb
2021-01-27 11:02
1 reply
2021-01-27 14:13
Im pro Super Soaker
2021-01-27 11:06
No. People always use the "government tyranny" excuse, but Jim Bob and his militia aren't gonna last too long against heat seeking drones.
2021-01-27 11:07
11 replies
Not really, if there is one thing organized government cant deal with are decentralized militias
2021-01-27 11:37
8 replies
I seriously doubt these militias are gonna be willing to hide out in mountains living off rats for years. I give them two weeks until they surrender and begin their life sentences.
2021-01-27 11:51
7 replies
History shows otherwise
2021-01-27 11:52
6 replies
For every successful revolution there are 1000's of failures. Would you put money on the guys who work in air conditioned offices and live off TV dinners to be the top 0.1%?
2021-01-27 11:54
1 reply
Depends on the situation. In the event that it comes to a armed insurrection against for example the government of the US the militias will probably represent a big chunk of the population, many of which from military and police. If it comes to that its anyones game.
2021-01-27 12:06
lmao if you think these people stand a chance vs drones. We live in current age with really fucking advanced military tech. no militia will be able to do anything vs gov, doesnt matter how big
2021-01-27 11:55
3 replies
They do, drones are great against conventional defenses and armored warfare, thats it.
2021-01-27 12:03
2 replies
I think that the general points is, the only way for militias to succeed is to have ovrwhelming support from the local population, and even then his point is, as long as the government stays unified and there are little to no army desertion, the gap in equipment between the two belligerents is so high the militias cant hope to accomplish anything. Sure they might survive in their holes for a while, but they will definetely not overthrow the government.
2021-01-27 14:25
1 reply
well thats to be expected, as I said in #62
2021-01-27 16:14
+1
2021-01-27 17:12
lmao +1
2021-01-27 19:43
I think guns are a need. How else you win in CSGO game. With a knife? Not possible man. Let the guns stay. We have already lost bots, don't let Valve take our guns.
2021-01-27 11:07
1 reply
#67
 | 
World Beard43
+1 I'm agree complete.
2021-01-27 12:12
Definitely yes. Currently waiting for the exam date so i can conceal carry. Due to corona it was already 2x postponed... People here dont realize that people who kill with guns dont care abosut laws. Killing is prohibited by law, isnt it?
2021-01-27 11:07
17 replies
if they don't care about laws and want to harm people why would you want to make killing people easier and give them a gun.
2021-01-27 11:32
2 replies
Because they can get a gun anyways?
2021-01-27 12:10
??? Your question makes literally no sense If you wanna kill someone pick a screwdriver for example wtf. None makes it easy. Do you even know what it takes to get a legal gun in sweden or here? To get a gun it takes a time, effor and money. Legal guns are not involved in crimes anyway.
2021-01-27 13:55
So if killing is prohibited by law; why are you, a supposed law abiding citizen buying a deadly weapon and attempting to be able to conceal it in public. It certainly looks like you want to have an easier time killing.
2021-01-27 11:47
13 replies
Because in this country, unlike in the uk for example, we have a legal (even constituional btw) right to defend ourselves or others. So why wouldnt i carry if i can and im legally allowed to? Gun licenses are shall issue here if you meet the reqirements by law (in short - age, no criminal record, law knowledge, gun safety knowledge, shooting test - you can check - gun laws in the czech republic article on wiki)
2021-01-27 14:01
4 replies
I am aware of Czech gun laws and that they are a thousandfold better than the USA, but as someone generally in favour of Swiss or Czech style gun laws, I still believe that concealing a weapon should not be allowed regardless
2021-01-27 14:23
3 replies
Why not? Are you for open carry??
2021-01-27 14:54
2 replies
I certainly prefer it
2021-01-27 19:01
1 reply
Interesting. I csnt imagine going on the tow square among people who openly carry ar15 or in a public transport :) Imo concealed carry is better than open carry. As peoppe around you dont panic. Anyway, use of gun in a public is prohibited here except two cases - adequate selfdefense and "extreme emergency" (dunno how to translate) so open carry doesnt make sense. Showing a gun in public is a misdeamor - 2 misdeamors and you are out of the gun game.
2021-01-28 08:07
Because we have the right to defend ourself.
2021-01-27 14:13
7 replies
You can defend yourself perfectly fine without a firearm.
2021-01-27 14:20
6 replies
Until the guy shoots you
2021-01-27 14:25
1 reply
So what? you gonna shoot the guy that tries to shoot you? What if someone else shoots you after because he thinks you are going to shoot them?
2021-01-27 16:21
Yeah, tell that to the attacker who jumps on you with something more than just bare fists. Even fists can be deadly, or ko you if someone knows little hit of boxing
2021-01-27 14:53
You can't say that when you've never defended yourself against a criminal with a gun
2021-01-27 16:04
1 reply
You don't actually know that, my friend
2021-01-27 19:00
yeah until they surround u at 10vs1
2021-01-27 16:22
This is a really broad statement and problems are very nuanced even starting with the area you live in and society in that area.
2021-01-27 11:08
no, if we got rid of guns we would never need them 5head
2021-01-27 11:12
#26
NAF | 
Netherlands DuRi4n_
just look at the school shooting stats in america compared to other countries, i am not pro gun
2021-01-27 11:15
#27
 | 
Germany Booya
People are fucking retards, they dumb, overly sensitive and emotional ... yeah give them all a gun, lay back, grab some popcorn and enjoy the new Purge Movie in front of you door
2021-01-27 11:15
wth is wrong with you
2021-01-27 11:16
I agree, cuz bad people will always find a way to find a weapon and use it against good people , wheter it's a gun or kitchen knife , therefore good people should have an access to DEFEND THEMSELVES with a gun. Why gun u ask ? Well, let's take womans into this discussion. Objectively, average woman is much weaker than average man and a pistol as a self defence would reduce that difference. But u know why is it prohibited in so many countries ? Cuz the ruling parties are affraid one day people will see what politicians do to normal people and uses guns as a force to kick them out of their chairs. That's why it is prohibited.
2021-01-27 11:19
3 replies
in poland its better to let yourself be robbed than defend and harm the attacker with that law since you would be treated worse than the aggresor
2021-01-27 11:20
2 replies
Not true.
2021-01-27 11:20
#71
 | 
Russia iiinej
It's the case in Russia as well.
2021-01-27 12:24
imo no, just make the law more harsh so people think twice because even if they get caught the punishment is too weak to discourage them from trying to attempt to do a crime again, and most polacks wouldn't do anything clever with gun so its better not to give it to them
2021-01-27 11:18
1 reply
U think criminals cares about ANY LAW at all ? :D Hahahaha
2021-01-27 11:22
#35
 | 
Hungary hardrise
Sandy Hook. People are dumb. Can't fight against it. But I can laugh on, how fucked up this world is. heh :) You definitely need a gun my friend, as suicide is being the leading cause of death worldwide 18-25, it might have a great impact on you. Which should be considered. Have fun!
2021-01-27 11:24
Unarmed population is easy to control, simple as that.
2021-01-27 11:25
4 replies
Finally a smart person in this thread
2021-01-27 14:28
+1, we need AR-15s to keep the government's heat seeking drones in check
2021-01-27 14:37
dumb and stupid people are easier to control*
2021-01-27 15:59
yea cos the american government doesnt control its people at all
2021-01-27 17:45
No. No one should have guns
2021-01-27 11:30
2 replies
Ahhh yes spread your asscheeks to the state
2021-01-27 14:28
1 reply
You act like guns and violence is the only way to stop to mean and evil state from "controlling you", really shows how simple minded americans can be, thankfully in Europe we aren't as dumb as you guys
2021-01-27 16:01
I'm against guns. Civilians can not get guns in Sweden, only way to get guns in Sweden is to become a licensed hunter or a cop.
2021-01-27 11:31
Not only im pro gun, but I also have a raging boner for girls with guns
2021-01-27 11:36
4 replies
#141
 | 
Germany Booya
expected from a country which delivers 80% of my daily gore content ... what is wrong with ur folk
2021-01-27 14:38
3 replies
why is it expected? I live far away from favelas which is where all of the "gore" happens. I just happen to love guns and that would have been the same if I was german or whatever
2021-01-27 16:13
2 replies
#187
 | 
Germany Booya
i too like guns, but in a big ass Safe on a shooting range with controlling organs, IDs and what not, and not under my far right Nazi neighbors bed
2021-01-27 16:17
1 reply
well then we are the same, I just happen to not only fear the "far right nazis" but also the encroaching government
2021-01-27 16:18
No, I'm just pro :)
2021-01-27 11:39
No, I'm Belshnickel
2021-01-27 11:49
im pro asteroid.
2021-01-27 11:51
#59
 | 
United States Noobdavind
I am pro gun, but that quote you used is just stupid
2021-01-27 11:55
I would suspect HLTV teenagers are mostly pro gun because guns are exciting to them
2021-01-27 12:05
1 reply
hell yeah baby
2021-01-27 12:08
if guns dont kill people, then why are there 21392319 school shootings every day in the US, the most pro-gun country in the west
2021-01-27 12:10
3 replies
#68
 | 
Estonia cuntycorn
They just need more guns to prevent the shootings mens)))
2021-01-27 12:12
You’re more likely to get struck by lightning than to be shot at school
2021-01-27 14:27
1 reply
you're more likely to get shot spending a day in USian school than spending one year in a school any other country
2021-01-27 16:19
#66
 | 
Estonia cuntycorn
On a scale from 'ban all guns' to USA I'm somewhere in the middle.
2021-01-27 12:11
Depends on the population + the mentality of said population and the rules on gun ownership. I'd be pro gun in Switzerland for example but against it in the US not like it matters at this point because there's too much guns in circulation.
2021-01-27 12:18
I believe countries such as Sweden have really good and balanced gun laws
2021-01-27 12:22
#73
 | 
Russia iiinej
I'm progun.
2021-01-27 12:26
My 15 years of kickboxing
2021-01-27 12:29
i am against it
2021-01-27 12:34
ofc i am
2021-01-27 12:34
Absolutely.
2021-01-27 12:52
Handguns and hunting rifles? Sure. Assault rifles? No. Guns help people killing people, but so do knives, point being people who commit murders dont care anyway and outlawing all guns would only hurt innocent people who want to defend themselves.
2021-01-27 12:55
2 replies
UK outlawed guns almost completely, and to my knowledge it has worked well
2021-01-27 13:19
1 reply
Much easier to prevent contraband items when your country is an island.
2021-01-27 15:41
look at london number of stabbings if people dont have gun they will find a way. Yes i believe people should have guns for protection all tho I wouldent be against mental health screenings every 6 months or so.
2021-01-27 13:22
#91
 | 
Denmark Notallama
Yes, I am pro-gun because I believe that there are sane people that should be allowed to bear arms and help keep certain animals from over-populating our country. However, I don't want a retarded situation like in the US with barely any background checks and guns everywhere. I wouldn't feel safe anywhere in the US with 50IQs walking around with guns.
2021-01-27 13:24
US is infested by gun toting donald trump supporters
2021-01-27 13:27
2 replies
Nothing wrong with gun toting
2021-01-27 14:14
1 reply
The meme is, when you think of it, the only other people that gun tot are terrorists like ISIS. SO as long as they are ok with being associated with ISIS, then its definitely fine.
2021-01-27 14:29
yes. guns exists. people who wants guns will get them anyway. prohibiting does nothing, in brazil people still have acess to guns even if they aren't legal. a guy once offered to sell me and old .38 for like 80 dollars, totaly illegal. it has to come with a cultural shift tho. people must learn to live with the fact that in any situation an armed civilian can go crazy and do some crazy shit. people would figth less for certain.
2021-01-27 13:29
4 replies
your first paragraph is absolutely not well thought-out, my friend.
2021-01-27 14:23
3 replies
the idea of prohibiting something goes against my libertarian ideals. guns exists so you are physically free to use them. forbidding something is a crime in itself. it has to be very well thought of and agreed on consensus, for something to be criminalized.
2021-01-27 22:35
2 replies
Yes buddy and thats why we are thinking of whether to agree on banning guns. Any philosophy, be it libertarianism or anything else, shouldnt just be idealistic but see whether it stands up to the scrutiny of what the philosophies real life effects are. If its conclusive (hypothetically) that banning guns would improve multiple facets of society, possibly drastically, one should set aside ones idealism for realism.
2021-01-28 13:19
1 reply
true. as long as it is really better for everyone consensus will be built. i got no problem with that. libertarian is not realistic as o whole but it is a very good base philosophy, with good values to start from.
2021-01-28 21:35
#97
 | 
Argentina atriX^
As someone who lives in a country that has insane levels of insecurity where muggers and robbers kill you out of spite and resentment even if you give them what they want, I simply cannot say No to guns. Every time I listen to the news that someone shot down a robber who had broken into his house, I can't help but be happy about it.
2021-01-27 13:57
it depends . i'd like to own a pistol at least for the shooting range but in the same time its not ok for everyone to have one . yea maybe you pass all your tests and so to own one but mental health can kick in in a random moment and you end up in a school
2021-01-27 14:11
no no no, i am not a professional gun, i am a human being :((( youtu.be/IHQr0HCIN2w?t=147
2021-01-27 14:12
So many privileged people in a bubble inside this thread
2021-01-27 14:14
11 replies
lmao yeah keep believing that you are "red-pilled" :D
2021-01-27 14:24
10 replies
Hell yeah I’m red pilled for wanting to defend myself and my family
2021-01-27 14:26
9 replies
Where I am from, I dont need to defend myself and my family, because no one has any fucking guns. And why? Because anytime that guns are found, they are banned and as such destroyed or whatever. little gun circulation -> little illegal gun ownership -> little gun crimes -> little gun deaths. One has to go out of his way and do some mental gymnastics to pretend that thats is NOT the actual chain of causality.
2021-01-27 14:30
8 replies
All fun and games til someone with a gun breaks into your house
2021-01-27 14:31
6 replies
they dont even get the gun in the first place. Thats the point.
2021-01-27 14:32
5 replies
If someone wants to get a gun they’ll find a way to do so
2021-01-27 14:34
4 replies
bullshit. Many people dont even have the contacts, especially fucking nerds like elliot rodger or adam lanza or dylan klebold or eric harris or EVERY SINGLE school shooter who would try to buy one via tor browser and get his cheeks busted by the fbi. Plus, if what you wrote in #136 was true, every country would have similarly shitty gun numbers, whether its a country with gun bans or not and the ONLY metric that would influence that would be the "mental health" of the populace. And until such connection is proven, your statement in #136 is a BASELESS ASSERTION.
2021-01-27 14:37
#150
 | 
Germany Booya
U literally said its more common to get struck by lightning than get shot in the school but with the same logic of numbers you still defend ur position when it comes to gun ownership??? WHat dont u understand by no guns, no gun criminality. In countrys with gun control u more likely to get killed by someone who missed a red traffic light, u wanna walk around in full medieval armor to be safe against this 0,0001 % of death too? I WanT DeFeND My FamILY, what a fucking nonsense
2021-01-27 14:48
#152
 | 
Lithuania Sedge
nice illogical appeal to futility, bot
2021-01-27 14:53
At this point you're just intentionally missing the point, or you're REALLY stupid to not understand what that guy was saying
2021-01-27 16:02
#146
 | 
Germany Booya
+1111
2021-01-27 14:40
yes, i would love to have a rifle at home.
2021-01-27 14:21
overall, I like it how it is in many countries that have strict gun regulation and as such, when someone kills like 3 people with a gun its headline news for a week straight. thats a GOOD THING. So to me, the ends have shown that they justify the means aka banning all guns. In a situation like the US, I would say, harder regulation and background checks, and full 100% ban on assault rifles, smgs, and the like. Nobody can tell me that a glock wont be enough to most often defend your home from assailants. And the LARPers wanna-be-soldiers wanna-be-rambos wanna-be-clint-eastwoods "rising up" against the government? BWAHAHAHA, yeah try winning against a military that you yourself made like a quadrillion dollars strong.
2021-01-27 14:28
gun laws are shit. Weapons are a big part of turkish culture. But european standarts brought anti gun laws. I cant even own a small pew pew glock :(
2021-01-27 14:30
10 replies
is that part of the conditions so that turkey might one day join EU? based EU 😎
2021-01-27 14:33
7 replies
Yes but they will never accept us due to cultural differences and long term goals are also different :D
2021-01-27 14:39
6 replies
yup, also based EU. As long as islamistic authoritarian Erdog is at the top, they dont deserve to come in.
2021-01-27 14:40
5 replies
No one in their sane mind would want to join the EU(SSR) anyway. Your asleep Vyrox... smell the smelly salts and wake up.
2021-01-27 15:10
1 reply
oh yeah coz india of all places is so much better?
2021-01-27 15:50
erdogan is cool for me. and i am not a big fan of eu :D
2021-01-27 15:21
2 replies
he is a real problem. I dont understand why certain populi just love these strong-men at the top that hold their own country hostage.
2021-01-27 15:50
1 reply
He will be the next major mvp so respect
2021-01-27 17:19
Man I feel you. We're not in the EU/don't want to come in and they're still breaking our balls about guns.
2021-01-27 15:44
1 reply
tnx. Switzerland has good gun laws as far as i know you can own military grade rifles. I wish we had the same too :(
2021-01-27 17:18
Fun statistics about mass shootings nytimes.com/2017/11/07/world/americas/ma..
2021-01-27 14:33
Solely depends on the person. A tool that can instantly kill people shouldn't be handed out to just anybody. Utilised correctly for safety and protection? Yes. On mass to the general public? No. Nobody should die for the stupidity of other people, in my opinion.
2021-01-27 14:34
Guns dont kill people. Bullets dont kill people. Your aim kills them. Just be happy people dont have insane aim like CSGO players. lol Jokes aside. Ultimately its peoples own karma that kills them. If anybody gets killed you should understand they deserved it because they probably killed somebody else in their previous life.
2021-01-27 14:37
4 replies
lmao and here we see, kids, why even seemingly harmless doctrines like karma are fucking awful.
2021-01-27 14:38
2 replies
Reality is awful. Learn what karma means before you say something because it makes it makes you look stupid. TheVyrox is probably an athiest kids so dont take him serious.
2021-01-27 15:00
1 reply
lmao yes, reality IS awful and karma is the ultimate wishful thinking rationalisation against having to accept the unfair reality of nature
2021-01-27 15:47
lul flag
2021-01-27 15:14
I was before but then there was a story. My friend's father was a Federal Policeman, so he was always armed. One day he got robbed and died, and then i realized he had no option. You either fire back or wait for them to see that you have a gun and get killed anyways. He couldnt leave the situation free and just lose his bike. No1 knows what really happened in the day (there was no footage in that street)
2021-01-27 14:39
gun gives people power, no, the murders in my country would be uncontrolled
2021-01-27 14:43
#149
 | 
Lithuania Sedge
america really do think they live in the old wild west , its hilarious. keep the guns, don't need them.
2021-01-27 14:48
No. Just because something's easy to manufacture it shouldn't automatically be available for everyone. Maybe in a country with a HDI of 0.9 i could take it.
2021-01-27 15:14
as much as i like to see people die for stupid reasons, i dont want citizens to have a choice /s
2021-01-27 15:46
#170
 | 
India sid76820
In our country we have an absolutely shit police and legal system. So therefore in some places and for certain individuals who are in imminent danger in India i think we should have guns. Like I have relatives who needed it coz some disputes and got shot in legs and arms. So i def think any country which is young and in infancy needs pro gun laws.
2021-01-27 15:54
Replace life sentence with the death penalty ez fix.
2021-01-27 15:54
No, I only use knife, zeus and nades
2021-01-27 16:06
no I'm not
2021-01-27 16:08
I don't buy into the whole second amendment school of thought. Guns and militias are typically not going to do anything against a modernized government, so in that sense, they don't hold a lot of value in my mind. Maybe that story is different in less modern or centralized countries, but you're never gonna have a successful uprising in China, guns or not. That being said, guns are extremely important for individual self defense. Guns are the great equalizer in this sense, they allow people who are otherwise very vulnerable to defend themselves with deadly force, regardless of mechanical skill or strength. Regulation is important, of course. But it's very possible to have a safe country with lots of guns.
2021-01-27 16:11
1 reply
#184
 | 
Sweden Hasager
Why would china have an uprising ? best country in the world
2021-01-27 16:12
#183
 | 
Sweden Hasager
yes but with background checks
2021-01-27 16:11
Guns in any mean are prohibited in Azerbaijan.Even hunting rifles is illegal.If police finds out,they take it from you.Tho some people have such rifles or double barreled shotguns.
2021-01-27 16:21
#194
 | 
France cestkazz
yeah
2021-01-27 16:22
#196
 | 
Poland Menaheer
People shuld be able to carry guns!
2021-01-27 16:22
yeah
2021-01-27 16:22
#198
 | 
Korea HullU
no, check out korea. we kill ourselves more XD
2021-01-27 16:23
7 replies
#203
 | 
Iran Gilaki
Real Koreans probably would, you are safe fakeflagger
2021-01-27 16:44
6 replies
#204
 | 
Korea HullU
nope im korean, and i dont wanna kill myself :)
2021-01-27 16:46
5 replies
#210
 | 
Iran Gilaki
Prove it
2021-01-27 16:57
4 replies
#221
 | 
Korea HullU
dagchyeo gaesaekkiya. neona jeungmyeonghae byeongsinah I don't see you ever translating this but here you go :)
2021-01-27 17:13
3 replies
#227
 | 
Iran Gilaki
I just send it to Korean and he said it's scuffed as fuck
2021-01-27 17:23
2 replies
#237
 | 
Korea HullU
what did i type :) ????
2021-01-27 17:43
1 reply
#256
 | 
Iran Gilaki
I didn't ask for a translation I just asked if it's correctly written
2021-01-27 18:37
No, i am shogun
2021-01-27 16:23
most guns per person in EU here. i am pro gun, only in CS
2021-01-27 16:41
#202
 | 
Iran Gilaki
No, mentally unstable people would cause so much problems
2021-01-27 16:43
I am on an eco round tho
2021-01-27 16:47
obviously
2021-01-27 16:48
"Guns don't kill people, I do!" -Postal Dude
2021-01-27 16:54
what's the point of having a police if you need a gun to protect yourself?
2021-01-27 16:56
1 reply
look at his flag, ofc they need shotguns for bear attacks! don't judge them so fast
2021-01-27 17:02
#218
 | 
Portugal Surya
Why would i not be pro- gun . why should i refuse to have that right. Criminals dont follow rules to begin with, so they can get guns illegaly, Yes very much pro gun, i pay my taxes i want to defend myself, not call the police to arrive 20 min later
2021-01-27 17:11
1 reply
+1
2021-01-27 17:12
Guns in society are for people who have a micropenis and need to feel big about themselves most of the time.
2021-01-27 17:14
13 replies
#228
 | 
Portugal Surya
OK if ur wife is being raped u want a gun or call the police to arrive 20 min later ?
2021-01-27 17:24
12 replies
get the camera
2021-01-27 17:27
1 reply
#231
 | 
Portugal Surya
Not a cuck
2021-01-27 17:28
You must be in a constant state of paranoia to conjure up such a situation. What's the context? I'm sure I can do many things to prevent it from happening, only in a very specific situation would a gun ever be useful in the first place, for example where you can catch the other person off guard. If you have a gun pointed to your head at close range the last thing you want to do is reach for your gun, by that time you'll be dead.
2021-01-27 17:30
6 replies
#244
 | 
Brazil ghcnvbkn
+1
2021-01-27 17:50
#246
 | 
Portugal Surya
U avoided the question. I rather be armed. Not to harm others. But to protect myself, if u don't want it don't buy it, criminals get guns illegally why can't a good citizen get them legally?
2021-01-27 17:51
4 replies
It comes down to mentality. A criminal doesn't necessarily want to kill somebody in a robbery or whatnot, but if they know or fear in their mind that someone they are committing a crime against has a gun, they have a much higher chance of being prepared to kill (as a criminal, to defend themselves from being shot). Isn't that logical? I feel giving every citizen a gun has a much higher risk not just for the criminal, but for the person it's meant to protect.
2021-01-27 18:47
3 replies
#263
 | 
Portugal Surya
Well u can have that choice of being disarmed in dangerous situation. To me nothing is more important than being able to defend yourself and your property
2021-01-27 18:52
2 replies
In an ideal world, guns wouldn't exist, for both criminal and citizen. Would you agree?
2021-01-27 18:55
1 reply
#268
 | 
Portugal Surya
Yes i agree but we dont live in an ideal world. Real life is not a pacificist utopia. Only homogenous white and asian countries can be disarmed without significant gun crime, but still i think they just have acess to guns based on the natural inalienable right to defend oneself
2021-01-27 19:00
#247
 | 
Canada firtlast
>wake up in portugal >live in constant fear of your wife being vulnerable feelsbadman
2021-01-27 17:52
2 replies
#250
 | 
Portugal Surya
No its pretty safe here and i dont actually own a gun, but i defend gun rights everywhere. There just isnt a reason for the government and criminals being the only ones to own them
2021-01-27 18:01
-999999999999999/8 4chan
2021-01-27 18:02
if humans were better then guns could be nice way to hunt but then we point them at each other :c classic case of guns dont kill people, people kill people
2021-01-27 17:14
2 replies
#241
 | 
Canada firtlast
you telling me you DON’T use an ar15 with 50 round dual mags, thermal sight, suppressor and gatling-crank attachment to hunt deer down?
2021-01-27 17:48
thats why there has to background checks and proper training instead of every lunatic being able to get a gun
2021-01-27 17:50
EZ no
2021-01-27 17:24
Guns in civil life should be for hunting and sport only. If you feel you need a gun to protect yourself you need to ask the hard questions what the hell is wrong with the society you life in. Bringing in more and more guns is not a solution but just a downwards spiralling trend.
2021-01-27 17:42
#240
 | 
Canada firtlast
guns don’t kill people, americans do
2021-01-27 17:47
#242
 | 
Brazil ghcnvbkn
no
2021-01-27 17:48
no i’m amateur-gun
2021-01-27 17:50
As long as the gun law are stricts enough and the gun certificates are delivered after a psych test i'm down. But not in the US tho, as you can see the murder to gun/ppl rate is 100x bigger in US then in Switzerland
2021-01-27 17:53
Anti-gun logic: people can't be trusted to have a gun, but they are able to choose the next president Being anti-gun is just a way to say "I don't trust my neighbor, but I trust on the politicians"
2021-01-27 17:58
2 replies
#252
 | 
Portugal Surya
Spot on
2021-01-27 18:02
+111111 left brain
2021-01-27 18:39
It's really not that unreasonable tbh. I mean, even if guns are legal or not, every single violent criminal will get his hands on one, one way or another. If the criminals are armed, which they are in any case, shouldn't the law abiding citizens be too? If not, this gives the criminals complete monopoly on violence. On the other handi can understand why one would not want guns for every single citizen, because among law abiding citizens there will always hide a fair amount of unstable and unpredictable people, this can be fixed by having rules in place that limits the right of gun ownership to tested and trained people. Like a drivers license. Not all countries have a responsive police force. If people with guns came here, i could do nothing except call the police and wait for them to arrive within 30 minutes. If i use "too much" self defence i go to jail no matter what they were planning to do. Guns are epecially needed here imo.
2021-01-27 18:11
In general yes.
2021-01-27 18:31
I believe that only white people should have access to guns.
2021-01-27 18:41
8 replies
#264
 | 
Portugal Surya
lmao. U russians are the best
2021-01-27 18:54
4 replies
You disagree with my opinion ?
2021-01-27 18:55
3 replies
#267
 | 
Portugal Surya
No i dont. Most gun crime in the USA is of those 13 % of population shooting each other in gang violence
2021-01-27 18:56
2 replies
US is a whole different universe compared to EU and CIS.
2021-01-27 19:00
1 reply
#272
 | 
Portugal Surya
Of course that's why i agree with u, i dont care if i sound rayciss... And im glad u dont care either
2021-01-27 19:02
Literal white supremacist
2021-01-28 14:14
1 reply
No, white people just have a clear head.
2021-01-28 14:43
+1
2021-01-28 22:42
Yes im very much pro guns, but also pro gun control and mental health checkups on suspicious individuals who own them :()
2021-01-27 19:03
I’m not pro gun, neither am I anti gun. But I like recreative shooting, I’m not really in the idea of self defense
2021-01-27 19:42
#280
 | 
Finland Sulttaani
if man has gun another man also need having guns. if no mens have guns no guns is needing.
2021-01-28 08:09
#287
 | 
Canada qui9
im pro-gamer B)
2021-01-28 17:19
everybody should have an mini nuke and 2 tigers and 3 lions
2021-01-28 21:38
2 replies
#292
 | 
Switzerland Jaksin
Only 2 and 3? What are you some sort of communist??
2021-01-28 21:46
1 reply
yes
2021-01-28 22:34
neither for nor against
2021-01-28 21:41
#296
 | 
Finland KassaK
Well I'm a leftist so obviesly I'm pro gun
2021-01-28 22:45
Yes
2021-01-28 22:46
Movistar Riders
1.61
Sprout
2.25
StylDunow
1.31
GROND
3.45
KOVA
1.35
thatwaslegitness
3.04
Bet value
Amount of money to be placed
Winning
Odds total ratio
-
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.