7 replies
with molotovs in csgo it would be more ct sided tran train and nuke combined
this map is basically a labyrinth with no skybox at all
14 replies
well to be fair the map is still in development so i think it'll change
1 reply
3 replies
+1
exactly, i feel like if it was going to be added it shouldve been done like 6 years ago and then adjusted over the years, rn its just too late at this point
i love tuscan as well but imo it wouldnt be great experience playing this map in csgo right now
but you worded it better
1 reply
Did CS 1.6 not have utility?
6 replies
utility in 1.6 or below isnt comparable. you have a Strong Flash and Nade that can Damage through Walls but absolute Garbage Smokes.
The Molotov alone makes this Map unplayable in this current state.
If people want a Tuscan so bad they need to adjust it to the Modern CS:GO Gameplay and make it wider
5 replies
Funny you should say that when CSGO maps in general are notoriously known for being a cluster fuck while in 1.6 it was the exact opposite. The most strategic map in the mappool (inferno) is extremely narrow. Every single spot can be blocked with a single Molotov. And the older version was even narrower. Remember old Banana?
The only thing that worries me is that the walls might be too tall for an effective use of flashbangs. The map is not finished yet but by the looks of it I wouldn't say it's unplayable.
3 replies
+1
1 reply
18 replies
9 replies
8 replies
7 replies
cubble not, +cache
3 replies
1 reply
yeah i think, but i want -mirage +cache
dust 2 is still a good map vertigo needs to go and cobble needs to comeback and maybe cache as well
2 replies
1 reply
Im olschool myself, i love old cbble, the new one is way too packed up and fucked up. New cache is still 95% of the old one, still very enjoyable. And dust2, man, even if the map has been around for 15+ years, basically unchanged, its still one of my favorites in csgo. Besides de_rats maps and westwood and all the other great ones in 1.6, d2 is where i have some of my first counter strike memories from that time (probably around 05-06).
As far as 2021 tuscan goes.. we just gotta wait and see, its a work in progress. Its way too early to judge atm.
5 replies
4 replies
3 replies
I wish Valve would add cpl_mill but it's a very, very low chance because of copyrights of the CPL.
7 replies
3 replies
by the way mens, if you didn't know, cpl_mill and de_tuscan are different maps! cpl_mill was kinda better than tuscan if i remember :D at least i liked more :D
1 reply
true, cpl_mill was pretty common and played in ESEA pugs :D wish i was older to play 1.6 on ESEA back in the days :/
Is tuscan going to be added to mm?
3 replies
YEAH, LETS GO VOLVO PLS DO THIS ASAP <3 TUSCAN4LIFE
+1
noooo 0/1000
The issue with tuscan is that it is OT made for CSGO, but for cs 1.something
This means that skybox, angles, chokeoints and timings are all off and the remake of the map would have to be significant it wouldn't be the same map.
Not to mention the poor layout of the map en from basic
It just isn't a good map, the only two reasons why people like it is because of Nostalgia and that people talk about it.
If you actually watch the map, or the Showdown matches on it, you would see that it is absolutely horrible for a csgo map
3 replies
I like your opinion)
but I have to say, it's too early to judge, they are trying their best.
"This means that skybox, angles, chokeoints and timings are all off and the remake of the map would have to be significant it wouldn't be the same map."
if you want to make from CS1.6/CS:S you have to change those things, I think it has the potentional to be at least good map at CS:GO... we'll see
1 reply
the angles and chokepoints are made for different weapons and utility. if you make the chokepoints smaller to fit the smokes/utility in CSGO you would remove angles that are pivotal for the map as it is now.
I don't see a solution how to update the map to be proper... unless the meta will be having gaps in the smokes
1 reply
2 replies
2 replies
weird art style
2 replies
Not done
1 reply
i know that, but what is there is indicative of the general art direction
i want de_lidl back
i dont think this map will be good for csgo but we dont know, maybe with big changes it become better, but i dont know if they will make this :/
but the texture idea seems so nice, i would love to see more maps on this type of style, its colorful but at the same time it matches with csgo, im sure it will look amazing when its done
YEEEEEES
cant wait for this map!
I try to ask again in this thread, after 2 threads and Qustions in the Match itself i couldnt get a single answer.... What is the Map Nip played versus Big in the Showmatch? It was already a complete converted Tuscan Map:
hltv.org/matches/2346040/big-vs-nip-show..
Noone seemed to be interested in this ... i was like whhhaaat where does the map came from @_@
3 replies
lovely map
awp_india in map pool pls
it looks like valorant map
1 reply
Yeah because they have not added textures yet
is this map 100% completed? some of the walls and boxes look like they haven't had texture added to them. looks like cardboard
you are late, a little bit
3 replies
-vertigo +tuscan
Textures are too bright and cartoony (but I guess they are heavy wip and missing still) but the map plays quite good and I'm up for rotation. That they are going to do a showmatch on it says it might be the map they are thinking adding back next. I'm personally fine with either cache, tuscan or anubis or old cobble. Map rotation is needed at this point.
It's a shame many of these mappers aren't really that pro-mindset friendly, the Cache rework was such a laughable example from a pro player's perspective how the texturing was made.
