Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Planes should have parachutes
brax | 
Other damnum 
Planes should have emergency parachutes built into them for emergency situations, ships have emergency baots in them, so why do planes not have emergency parachutes in them? It would improve/lessen plane fatality rate by LOADS. Opinions?
2021-03-05 20:46
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
#1
brax | 
Other damnum
emergency boats" someone should contact Elon or some other rich guy to startup this idea. About plane parachutes - either have them in seat, or just the plane itself in a compartament that could be reached outside the pilots cabin
2021-03-05 20:48
how many passengers would know how to use it and maybe just a massive parachute that can land the whole plane ezpz
2021-03-05 20:48
10 replies
#4
brax | 
Other damnum
Same way passangers know how to use emergency masks and vests bruh Yes this is the idea I was thinking about honestly.
2021-03-05 20:49
men this is 300iq
2021-03-05 20:50
1 reply
yes mens I become thousandaire now
2021-03-05 20:51
That is just dumb considering it wont do shit if the plane catches on fire
2021-03-05 21:02
3 replies
unluku baluku. also I mean like it is a shit idea lul i was just guessing what the OP said
2021-03-05 21:12
#29
brax | 
Other damnum
Yea plane fires suck massive dong, but i wasn't talking about them tbh, i was just talking about lets say plane becomes somehow uncontrollable and thats the way to soften the landing at least a bit if anything
2021-03-05 21:23
just make it out of steel 5head
2021-03-05 21:27
Do you love Planes?
2021-03-05 21:13
2 replies
no.
2021-03-05 21:22
1 reply
:( sad
2021-03-05 22:30
#3
AM | 
Russia Skengdo
this gives more chance for plane to drop
2021-03-05 20:49
1 reply
#5
brax | 
Other damnum
Yet, It would give more chances for people to survive, and if it's super well designed, there would be no way. Like I've watched Wikipedia pages on plane accidents, fatal and non fatal loads lately, and havw tought about this way too much, but you just cannot disagree with the idea that if the plane would have more chances for people to survive the landing that just splatter like ketchup on the ground
2021-03-05 20:52
#8
 | 
United States weaboo
Interesting idea probably hard to pull off considering the weight of an airplane
2021-03-05 20:51
4 replies
#10
brax | 
Other damnum
Yea perhaps, but if you can fit loads of people into one, why couldn't you try to design it so that it would fit a parachute cloth into it?
2021-03-05 20:53
3 replies
there is a limit to how much luggage u can bring on board, u have* to buy more. so its probably already "close" to its limit. if they put in parachutes that ekstra weight is less money in luggage :) money is more important than a few lives ofc
2021-03-05 20:57
2 replies
#25
brax | 
Other damnum
Yes that's how capitalism works men
2021-03-05 21:21
1 reply
yup
2021-03-05 21:22
But adding a few hundred parachutes would increase the weight a fuck ton
2021-03-05 20:53
1 reply
#11
brax | 
Other damnum
Rather that tons of small parachutes, just add one big parachute cloth compartament that activates automatically or maybe that it only activates by hand If it's designed like that it can transport people of all sizes i dont think it would be hard to design the plain in favor of the parachute aswell
2021-03-05 20:55
there are plenty of videos about that youtube.com/results?search_query=why+pla..
2021-03-05 20:54
1 reply
#13
brax | 
Other damnum
Passanger parachute =/= compartament that activates and tries to soften the failing planes fall
2021-03-05 20:56
why not just a huge parachute for the airplane itself?
2021-03-05 21:00
2 replies
#16
brax | 
Other damnum
This is what I was talking about and what this topic is about mens
2021-03-05 21:01
1 reply
A parachute that big would need ideal conditions to deploy
2021-03-05 21:04
People are too stupid to wear a mask properly, do you really think they know how to use a parachute in stressful situation ?
2021-03-05 21:15
1 reply
#23
brax | 
Other damnum
#15 It would be idiot proof
2021-03-05 21:20
As if plane crashes happen often lul
2021-03-05 21:17
10 replies
#24
brax | 
Other damnum
Not really, but they still happen EVERY year. And are usually VERY fatal.
2021-03-05 21:20
9 replies
#34
 | 
Europe letqpena
No they're not. When they are fatal, no parachute will save them anyway.
2021-03-05 21:27
6 replies
#38
brax | 
Other damnum
Educte yourself b4 actual argument
2021-03-05 21:34
4 replies
#45
 | 
Europe letqpena
Nice eduction yourself, count the instances on last few years where parachute would have made a damn difference.
2021-03-05 21:37
3 replies
#46
brax | 
Other damnum
Well, I guess you've never heard of fatal plane crash survivors either. What a dumb idiot.
2021-03-05 21:39
2 replies
#49
 | 
Europe letqpena
Nice fishfodder.
2021-03-05 21:41
1 reply
#54
brax | 
Other damnum
Nice dopefish
2021-03-05 21:44
More likely to die in a car accident or boat accident then a plane crashing down
2021-03-05 22:26
1 reply
#75
brax | 
Other damnum
That's hella true and I know, but also more likelyhood of survival in a boat or car accident(my dad had one really brutal that made him a invalid/disabeled in one leg and many other ways) So if shit hits the fan in the plane, you know you're dead 100% of the time
2021-03-05 23:09
WOW you must be the first person who thought of this!!!
2021-03-05 21:21
5 replies
#30
brax | 
Other damnum
No, not by far, but that's why I am asking your opinions, and why is it not at least been designed (fully desgnied by professionals and built).yet other useless dumb shit has been and even created just for it to fail?
2021-03-05 21:25
4 replies
3 replies
#32
brax | 
Other damnum
2021-03-05 21:26
2 replies
oooooh i believe there has been a concept for this. found it youtube.com/watch?v=pIGkmDb0aIw
2021-03-05 21:28
1 reply
#41
brax | 
Other damnum
It id very similar what I was thinking, but I think (de) attachable one would actually increase MORE risk rather than it all being built in and letting the pilots just get fkd
2021-03-05 21:37
dumb thread and dumb replies. obvious for anyone who has any interest in aviation.
2021-03-05 21:33
4 replies
#39
brax | 
Other damnum
Dumb reply, you didn't need to click on this thread, hence that makes you even dumber. Played yourself kid.
2021-03-05 21:35
2 replies
hltv is all about reading dumb things, I was fully aware what I am clicking and expected nothing else
2021-03-05 21:37
1 reply
#55
brax | 
Other damnum
I have no idea what you are on about then. Useless comment. Enjoy ignore.
2021-03-05 21:46
+1
2021-03-06 15:22
#40
OK | 
Peru TheJuan
boats have little boats in case of emergency so planes should have little planes
2021-03-05 21:35
2 replies
#43
brax | 
Other damnum
axaxaxaxaxxaaxaxaxxaxaxaxxa
2021-03-05 21:37
lmao 200iq
2021-03-05 21:40
#44
 | 
United Kingdom Jonty04l32
It is most certainly an interesting idea but if it was possible, I'm certain it would've been implemented already... Plus, the parachutes ain't doing diddly-squat if the plane crashes, explodes or catches fire.
2021-03-05 21:37
1 reply
#50
brax | 
Other damnum
Explodes or catches fire, for sure, but in crash scenario thats where it would and should be implemented on actually, but I agree if it was to be designed it would have been already, but also not certainly true since Internet, phones, pc, radios, teslas inventions even lightbulbs and etc. never been created before they were and could have as well damn been if there was a genius like creators of all those devices
2021-03-05 21:41
ITT: people who don't know how g-forces work and how hard it would be to stop or slow your average passenger jet with just a parachute nothing short of a miracle is going to save you when your flugzeug loses the flug part. you'd be better off just making all the seats ejection seats
2021-03-05 21:40
1 reply
#52
brax | 
Other damnum
1. Ye maybe 2. Ye maybe built into seats lol
2021-03-05 21:43
If you jump out of plane on 10 km above earth you'll instantly die
2021-03-05 21:42
1 reply
#53
brax | 
Other damnum
#13 Also I don't think planes fly that low mens
2021-03-05 21:43
- takes weight - expensive - not all crashes are on the ground, it would be useless in the ocean - the plane is too fast
2021-03-05 21:51
4 replies
that's why we need small jetpacks so if it crashes in the ocean, everyone can safely fly to the land
2021-03-05 21:52
2 replies
Just type ROCKETMAN 4Head
2021-03-05 21:52
#64
easy | 
Poland DefeN
Or just give everyone an Iron Man suit mens
2021-03-05 22:00
#92
brax | 
Other damnum
I mean plane crashes at sea are probably the only likelyhood of most people surviving even tho they have to cannibalize
2021-03-05 23:22
No Especially when you are on a passenger plane its engines are strong enough to suck you up in a second once you are out of the plane. Even when we ignore the plane engine there are still problems like teaching people to use the parachute, even for hobby no one does that and jumps with a professional instead.
2021-03-05 21:52
1 reply
#78
brax | 
Other damnum
2021-03-05 23:12
People aren‘t trained for parachutes and in the case of an emergency almost no one will be able to put them on and jump out in a structured manner, they will all panic. Your best chance at surviving is a crash landing. Also opening a plane window mid air is not easy since it would create a suction that would eventually create chaos. Also the chance of dying from a plane crash is so low that it‘s simply not worth it. We could also prohibit blankets since in 15 years 10k people died from „Accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed"
2021-03-05 21:53
3 replies
how do people die by a blanket, wtf
2021-03-05 22:48
1 reply
I know, it‘s stupid
2021-03-05 23:01
#79
brax | 
Other damnum
2021-03-05 23:12
you mean a huge parachute for the plane? or a lot of parachutes for the ppl?
2021-03-05 21:54
1 reply
#80
brax | 
Other damnum
1st one
2021-03-05 23:13
#62
 | 
Germany I__car
Have u ever watched soyuz backing home or the new american dragon ? they are small ships and have huge parachutes, americans fall on water but russians on soil so not only parachutes are used but also small rocket engines to slow down even more b4 touching ground. Both falls well selected place. In your idea they would have to design a very expensive airplane with a feature that would be used very very rarely, probably never, i mean, pilots still have good chance of solve the situation, in what case they would have to parachute the plane, with time enough to save everyone ? Imagine pilots taking this dangerous decision instead of just trying a safe land ? And once near ground no parachute will solve, so they would just use this option when in avery high altitude... it is just a dumb idea.
2021-03-05 22:02
3 replies
A crash landing is probably your best chance
2021-03-05 22:00
1 reply
#81
brax | 
Other damnum
Probably
2021-03-05 23:14
#83
brax | 
Other damnum
Yes i have and i think their scientist were top notch when designing those things.
2021-03-05 23:15
No it wouldn´t. The time it would take for people to put parachutes on and get to and out of the doors would not be available in most cases. The majority of plane crashes happen at low altitude, around take off and landing. If having parachutes in large passenger planes was in any way feasible, then some airlines would implement it to attract more customers, but none has done so. Passenger planes would have to be redesigned with a huge opening gate at the pack, for passengers to be able to evacuate quickly and safely - like the Hercules transport planes and other similar planes, that can drop parachutists in big bundles. It would be an uncomfotable plane with poor flight economy and fewer seats - unable to compete with regular passenger planes.
2021-03-05 22:01
1 reply
#91
brax | 
Other damnum
2021-03-05 23:21
Because you can't jump from an airplane flying at 800+ km/h at 10+km high. Militaries trained for HAHO have hundred of jump and yet suffer multiple casualties each years at such altitude despite a 3 or 4 time lower flight speed.
2021-03-05 22:34
3 replies
#82
brax | 
Other damnum
I wasn't talking about personal parachutes men
2021-03-05 23:14
2 replies
Ships do not have boat to keep them afloat dude.
2021-03-05 23:20
1 reply
#94
brax | 
Other damnum
Nibba wat?
2021-03-06 15:18
I bet if you had 100 test flights where planes had all their engines shutdown in a mayday simulation Doing emergency landings would be 10x safer than throwing 200 untrained parachutists out
2021-03-05 22:36
1 reply
#84
brax | 
Other damnum
2021-03-05 23:15
it would be more expensive for the airplane company if the people survived the crash
2021-03-05 22:38
3 replies
That's a good point lol
2021-03-05 23:03
1 reply
#89
brax | 
Other damnum
2021-03-05 23:20
#88
brax | 
Other damnum
I guess their families sueing isn't
2021-03-05 23:20
If it's one big parachute for the plane: do you realize how big it would have to be to slow down tens to hundreds of tons of an object free falling? If it's individual: what exact situation would you use this in? If the plane loses control you aren't getting out of your seat... If it blows up or falls apart you're gone... Maybe if it loses power to both engines and is just left gliding? Still going too fast for you to jump out safely and you'd have a much better chance surviving the crash landing.
2021-03-05 23:01
5 replies
#85
brax | 
Other damnum
I mean capsules were also super heavy that came down from space, AND super fast, if someone were to design a parachute like that for a plane, it would have saved thousands upon thousands of lives
2021-03-05 23:17
4 replies
The mass of the capsule is not even close to that of an airplane so a large enough parachute (or rather a few smaller ones) is feasible. You're not the first one to think of this. If it were feasible it would have already been done.
2021-03-06 09:17
1 reply
#96
brax | 
Other damnum
I mean cellphones, other electronics, even trains and other shit to some extent weren't made untill they were made amd the resources have always been there
2021-03-06 15:21
You realize plane accident happen very rarely?As in with 50-100+ passengers,not small ones.If a plane crash happens its a talking point for weeks and months because they happen insanely rarely.Your thousands upon thousands of lives saved would accumulate in decades if not centuries
2021-03-07 10:22
1 reply
:D:DDDD:DD "YOU REALIZE PLANE ACCIDENTS HAPPEN VERY RARELY" "BIG ONES THAT IS" HOW DELUSIONAL WAY OF THINKING. EVERY LIFE IS WORTH SOMETHING. #37 every. single. year. A catastrophe.
2021-03-07 10:26
I think every plane should have skilled macigian so they can create a teleport gate,portal to a safe place in emergency situations
2021-03-05 23:09
1 reply
#86
brax | 
Other damnum
+111 actually smart turkish on hltv
2021-03-05 23:17
never been on a plane, never will, america #1
2021-03-05 23:10
1 reply
#87
brax | 
Other damnum
I would see why axaxaxaxaxxaxa Edit : AXAXAAXXAXAXAXAXAXXAXA
2021-03-05 23:18
Odds are the plane would crash without time to deploy these parachutes.
2021-03-06 15:21
3 replies
#99
brax | 
Other damnum
Odds are if it were to hit speed of sound it would be too close to the ground, otherwise there is always time to deploy, just listen to blackbox recordings and see how long they usually take, not the very end or the blackbox recording, but when shit hits the fan
2021-03-06 15:26
2 replies
The point is: 99% of the crashes are avoidable in the accidents. In the 1% there's no time for reaction. Without the fans in the high feets, the plane coud just plane to the near airport (with risks though).
2021-03-06 16:02
1 reply
I don't agree w that, avoidable crashes are much less %
2021-03-07 09:57
- barely anyone knows how to use it - heavy - useless if over ocean - need hydraulic wrench to open door - plane crashes happen quickly, often near landing or take off, preparing parachute+ opening door whilst plane is out of control is not really gonna happen
2021-03-06 15:25
1 reply
2021-03-06 15:26
Cirrus planes do have parachutes, but I don't think it's possible to have a parachute system on a big plane You don't need a parachute on a big altitude anyway, it's safer to just glide to the closest airport, #101 is right
2021-03-07 10:09
This dumb question has been answered a billion times.Commercial planes fly at like 10k altitude,its cold as hell with little oxygen,even mountain climbers need oxygen packs to survive,there is no way common folk will survive that.People dont know how to parachute properly,that would require tons of training.It would make the plane heavier,more expensive for pretty much absolutely no worth.Flying is easily the safest way to travel already,there is an accident like every 5-10 years its just not worth it.
2021-03-07 10:17
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.