Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Ancient FPS
 | 
Sweden will_u_be_my_retard 
does anyone else has trash fps on this map? i guess it's not my pc with gtx 1070 ti and ryzen 5 2500. but it goes down to 40 fps in some places wtf?
2021-05-08 13:15
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
r5 2600 and about 200-300 800x600 all low
2021-05-08 13:17
12 replies
#4
 | 
Liberia rationale
no GPU? noice!
2021-05-08 13:17
10 replies
Hahaha, i laugh :D:D:D
2021-05-08 13:42
9 replies
#58
 | 
CIS roye
dont hurt urself 800 all low wtf
2021-05-08 14:28
8 replies
Bestest res)))
2021-05-08 15:20
6 replies
#68
 | 
CIS roye
maybe u have really small monitor and black bars lol
2021-05-08 15:24
5 replies
27 inches and stretched mens))))
2021-05-08 15:25
4 replies
#70
 | 
CIS roye
ur eyes will need huge glasses soon
2021-05-08 15:26
3 replies
Been playing like this for 12 years, people have told me the same thing for a long time, but my doctor tells me I have above average eyesight. When is this happening?
2021-05-08 15:39
2 replies
i have 27" and play 1024 stretched. the advantage of 27" over 24" is that you can sit a bit further away from the screen. also, if you go outside for 30 minutes every day and look at things far away, then your eyesight wont get worse by looking at screens. i have been looking at screens close up in the dark for most of my life and i still have better than 20/20 eyesight at any range. what also helps a lot for eye strain is having higher hz, i have had 120hz since about 2010 and my eyes dont get tired like they do if i use a 60hz screen. i have 240hz now which is even better.
2021-05-09 08:33
1 reply
Thank mr. Krakeling
2021-05-09 09:18
Normally its 1280x960 stretched, but imma be trying new things and this aint that bad. Its very good for holding close angles, but not 1 tapping far away or im still not used to it in this res.
2021-05-10 09:57
#88
 | 
Canada JC_123
+1 except r5 1600 and rarely see below 250 at 960p. My RAM is jacked though tuned it carefully.
2021-05-09 04:40
#2
 | 
Finland nexustron
Not really, there have been a few maps where I get FPS drops constantly, one place is Pitstop's T Spawn which is OK-ish since there is no action there pretty much every game
2021-05-08 13:17
i struggle to get 40 fps looking into a wall so yeah
2021-05-08 13:17
#5
 | 
Sweden Kasidro
No but I have a 5900x and a 3080 so it would be weird. Gonna try it on my laptop and see
2021-05-08 13:19
It is your pc, ryzen 5 2600 is horrible for cs 3rd gen ryzen minimum 5th gen recommended /closed
2021-05-08 13:18
22 replies
Also fps is worse on this trash map
2021-05-08 13:20
2 replies
'trash map' lmao, u wanna play only mirage for the rest of your gold nova life?
2021-05-08 15:12
1 reply
#75
 | 
Jordan Zereeni
mirage is shit but ancient is even shittier
2021-05-08 16:11
#10
 | 
Sweden Kasidro
There is no 5th gen ryzen 5000 series is 4th gen
2021-05-08 13:23
3 replies
Ye whatever 5000 series
2021-05-08 13:25
#72
 | 
Europe Koc77
there are 4th gen are laptop cpu's
2021-05-08 15:42
1 reply
#76
 | 
Sweden Kasidro
They are not 4th gen. 4000 series is the 3rd Gen mobile chips refresh of Zen 2. 5000 series is the first Zen 3 aka 4th gen ryzen cpus
2021-05-08 16:44
lol .. in other maps he have good fps .. but in this shit map he have drop frame .. the problem from the map not from pc .. /cLoSeD
2021-05-08 13:30
14 replies
#8 Under 200 on other maps still, that's far from good
2021-05-08 13:33
13 replies
#18
 | 
New Zealand Chicken_RD
not everyone has a high end pc
2021-05-08 13:36
4 replies
Well you'll need one for stable 250+fps in every situation
2021-05-08 13:39
3 replies
#34
 | 
New Zealand Chicken_RD
it makes the map less accessible to casual players. I sometimes play casual games on my laptop getting 80-120fps on most maps. I get about half that on Ancient.
2021-05-08 13:52
#60
NiKo | 
Germany Fyaan
laughs in 60 fps on mirage. Damn laptops
2021-05-08 14:30
if you need to buy a high end pc in 2021 to play a game with bad graphics that came out in 2012, there is a problem somewhere.
2021-05-09 08:34
ok but when he have 160 frame in other maps and 90 frame in this shit map ... thats not good ... there is a problem from the map .... and all of the new maps have the same problem ... new cache anubis and others ... so .. there is a problem from the new maps ...
2021-05-08 13:50
5 replies
Yea definitely but if he gets cpu like #9 he will have decent fps even on ancient Valve retarded for sure though
2021-05-08 13:54
3 replies
you are stupid ..... i am telling you about another maps in the same game with 250 frame ... but in this shit map he have drop frames ... he told you in other maps he have 250-300 frame .. but the drop frame was in this new shit map .... ez to understand but you are ...
2021-05-09 09:11
y i have to get a new pc for 1 map in the same game .. i will just play on 250-300 frame in others and drop this map from faceit matches ... new maps are shit .. old maps good ... y ? .. its just because valve is doing something wrong .. and when the map released for the first time in scrimmage maps ... valve said that they will fix the frames and then they told us they fixed but nothing happened ... same drop frame .. so , valve know that the did something wrong and its not normal that this new maps have drop frame while the old maps not ... and why i have to upgrade the pc for this map ? its csgo not a graphic game ... its not all about graphic ... old cache old cbble mirage dust 2 overpass train vertigo inferno .. all of this have a good fps and not bad graphic its good for the players ... and in this new shit map .. bad colors bad details bad fps !!!!! its just not good dont try
2021-05-09 09:20
look at this :) ... why in the new this map he have drop frame ? thats because its a shit map from valve and valve have to fix the fps !! prnt.sc/12pn1kk
2021-05-09 09:34
every time valve reworks a map or adds a new one it has lower fps newferno lower fps newke lower fps new dust2 lower fps new cache lower fps new train will have lower fps 100% only mirage and overpass left to fuck up and then they will start over again.
2021-05-09 08:35
no i have like 250-300 on other maps
2021-05-08 13:59
1 reply
Nah, had ryzen 5 2600 it goes down to even 150 in heavy encounters 300 fps in spawn means nothing, fps low's are where it's at
2021-05-08 14:01
LMAO? i have fairly over 300fps
2021-05-08 13:20
5600x + 1060 600fps average in some spots i got drops to 400-350 example on T spawn so just around the water area
2021-05-08 13:21
19 replies
you play 1024 all lowest?
2021-05-08 13:36
18 replies
1280x960 all low x8 x16
2021-05-08 13:36
17 replies
1440X1080 ryzen 5600X gtx 1060 shadows high textures high rest low 4x 4x 220 fps lows with no one in the server unplayable for me. same settings any other map never drops below 300 even with smokes and x players
2021-05-08 13:42
16 replies
You play on too high resolution, too high details for your GPU to keep up with it.
2021-05-08 13:45
11 replies
I just tried with my friend who has the same GPU as me, but i5 9400F. we did a lineup on mid and we had exact same FPS with this GPU (I had 279-281 constant fps, he had 278-280, so it's gpu bottlenecked). CPU doesn't make any difference, so the map is poorly optimized for people with slower graphic cards. In other maps, I am way above 200 fps average even with higher res than him.
2021-05-08 13:59
10 replies
#9 has 600 fps with 1060 , how ?
2021-05-08 14:03
9 replies
he doesnt, its impossible. i was trying just now, 600 fps was my highest, if i dont count 700 in a smoke. average with all low and 1280x960 and 4X MSAA and bilinear FXAA was probably around 400-420 fps average with 320 fps lows. //5600X 1060 3200 mhz 16gb
2021-05-08 14:15
8 replies
320 fps lows is very good, just play it like that then, at least on ancient you can switch to a higher res on other maps if that's what you like
2021-05-08 14:17
6 replies
It is good, but not very good. Other maps run much better (also look better, e.g. inferno, nuke), so I will stick with other maps. Also, I don't like how the map is built. There are clips (invisible walls basically) everywhere, even spots that you should reach easily and look accessible. I hate when mappers do this, in general, I would not allow such poorly designed map to be released in any community, let alone making it an official competitive map.. the fuck. Wasn't de_anubis better than this? I feel like many people loved the map, whereas nobody liked this one..? We are getting trolled by valve.
2021-05-08 14:23
5 replies
yea map is trash and fps is worse on it so I won't be playing until they update it / fix it train is way better than this shit, new cache is shit and anubis wasn't very good
2021-05-08 14:25
4 replies
New cache was the worst map in terms of FPS I think. Now ancient took the crown by a mile.
2021-05-08 14:27
3 replies
not just fps, both look like green pile of shit can't they just make simple maps with normal visibility? idk these devs are mentally impaired most definitely
2021-05-08 14:30
1 reply
the "devs" are 2 janitors in a broom closet with a ibm thinkpad laptop from 2004 that cant run the game anymore
2021-05-09 08:39
hi evis
2021-05-09 04:05
theres not much point in turning on AA if youre playing on low res. especially if the map is gpu bottlenecked. try 1440*1080 or 1280*960 with all low graphics except for the minimum you need to see through molotovs, i forgot which setting that was, i think it was shadows or effects detail had to be on high. and then 16x anisotropic filtering and no AA. that should help with the gpu bottleneck and still give you relatively sharp textures and edges.
2021-05-09 08:40
Ill post here how to get more. Ill edit this comment. Shadows low- no reason to put them high will not give you any advantage. Texture low- they eat like 100 fps. And make the maps with more useless details. You can put one of the antialias on x16 and the other one keep it on 4. The one of x16 has no fps loss, 16 or 0 its the same in terms of fps. 16x will help with visibility. Disable full-screen optimizations (Windows 10) Right click csgo.exe > Properties > Compatibility tab > tick the “Disable full-screen optimisations” box. (Enabled by default) *steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/91691.. ( This one gives me exactly +100 fsp) Optimise nvidia settings for better performance. youtu.be/9eUdp2x4YhM?t=54 Console commands : mat_queu_mode -1 or 2 it enables multicore. cl_forcepreload 0. Remove any csgo launch options related to performance like -high -threads etc. Useful launch option : -novid: disables Valve / CS:GO startup screen Loads csgo faster. fps_max 600
2021-05-08 13:51
1 reply
High shadows give better visibility through molotovs, but add high shader and effect detail for best results. This will lower fps a lot though For some, texture detail makes very little difference, so personal preference MSAA will affect your fps a good amount, so turn this down if fps is bad (2x or off) If youre on Windows 10 20H2 V2 (Oct. update), disabling fullscreen optimizations can actually lower fps, so leave it default
2021-05-09 03:39
Just put everything on low and msaa 4x and put lower res like 1280x960, should fix ur problems
2021-05-08 13:50
1 reply
why use msaa on low res, it makes no sense
2021-05-09 08:41
adren had drops to 80 in some spots. i assume he has a pc that is suited for pc ;) clearly they have to fix some stuff there.
2021-05-08 13:25
#13
 | 
Sweden Nappev
i7 7700k msi gtx 1080 200 fps or 300 fps. with some drops. ive had drops to 170 but they never stay under 200.
2021-05-08 13:27
trash map .. remove this shit map
2021-05-08 13:29
1 reply
arab brain
2021-05-08 15:16
yeah fps stays around at 160-170 everywhere on the map. i need 240fps cuz 240hz... before this update i got around 400fps on all maps. now i get these weird 160-170fps very often on ALL maps. idk..... this game gets more broken after every update. guess i will just have to buy a better pc again to have more fps (atleast 240) :)
2021-05-08 13:35
6 replies
Cpu?
2021-05-08 13:36
5 replies
i7 6700k clocked at 4.6ghz 1050ti (trash, i know. need to upgrade but prices...........)
2021-05-08 13:41
4 replies
6700k still strong single core, still decent But it's rip with 1050ti
2021-05-08 13:47
3 replies
yeah the cpu is fine. 1050ti is trash but i cant buy gpu now for 3times the price... i would have more and STABLE fps with a better gpu but this last update where ancient got put into active duty map pool just completely fucked all my fps on every map. went from stable 350-400 fps to stuck at 160-170fps... :( i need atleast 240fps cuz 240hz monitor.
2021-05-08 13:51
2 replies
Idk about other maps, they should be the same as before Maybe reinstall cs or even perform a good old system reset
2021-05-08 13:57
1 reply
i installed w10 last week on new ssd (980 500gb) everything worked fine for a few days until the update came. but yeah might try a reinstall of csgo.
2021-05-08 14:01
i7 4790k gtx 1070 300-400 fps on other maps 200-300 fps... why?
2021-05-08 13:36
#30
 | 
Ivory Coast Rix7o
I feel better than before, maybe valve improve something like config of the map. and I found they removed some moving action of background therefore the FPS is better now
2021-05-08 13:49
#35
 | 
Sweden frizzahh
Tried to play it and my game crashed lol
2021-05-08 13:53
#40
 | 
Hungary Shiron212
It's strange, older 4 core 4 threaded CPUs perform better on this map than the newest 6/8 core ones I have an i5 3470 and an RX 570 and I have 200 fps constantly, while on other maps, it drops down to even 60 sometimes
2021-05-08 14:00
i had around 80-70 fps around some places on this map.....on other maps i have 300-400. they should fkin do map which are not eating so much FPS
2021-05-08 14:03
#45
 | 
Europe Niko0
I have 3950x Ryzen and 2080 and everymap has +500. So dont know, dont care, poor people can go play tic tac toe or something.
2021-05-08 14:03
7 replies
imgur.com/a/H5pDsS5 even my ryzen 3300x beats ur cpu and mine goes close to 200 in heavy encounters so stop lying buddy both suck compared to 5600x though
2021-05-08 14:09
6 replies
i have 5600X and ancient on low settings is 400 average fps with 1060, if you go higher settings and 1440X1080 I had lows 220 fps or so, that's heavy GPU bottleneck tho. the CPU itself could go much higher as it is in mirage where i have 800 fps easily
2021-05-08 14:18
2 replies
#57
 | 
Europe Niko0
Well, i play with 100% max performance settings at 1440x1080. Idle fps on ancient around 480-520, of course when stuff happening drops down drastically but anyways.
2021-05-08 14:27
1 reply
1060? /edit you have 2080 bro, your fps will be much higher than on 1060 even with worse cpu
2021-05-08 14:52
#55
 | 
Europe Niko0
Lol. I dont give af about ur shitty "comparing websites". Also, ur poor too, get a job.
2021-05-08 14:26
2 replies
"comparing websites" How would you know which one gives you more fps then you filthy brainlet, you buy all cpus and test them? Monkey Imagine paying 3x the price and getting less fps, at least buy 5600x then dummy
2021-05-08 14:29
1 reply
3950X is not for games
2021-05-08 14:57
I7 8700k RTX 2060 300 fps locked, doesn't drop a thing. Map is still garbage so I don't care tbh, insta ban on faceit.
2021-05-08 14:03
#48
 | 
Poland Aiko_
I5 2400 Gtx650ti 1280x960 High High Low Low X4 X16 Around 80fps in some spots drops to 40 On mirage got around 200 Sadge
2021-05-08 14:13
3 replies
Hey, this map is heavy on your GPU. Go X4 X4 and all low and you should have a huge boost in fps compared to other maps.
2021-05-08 14:24
1 reply
#73
 | 
Poland Aiko_
Ty for advice, i'll try it later and let you know how much it helps me^^
2021-05-08 16:05
High shadows and 4x Msaa, no wonder why
2021-05-09 03:41
Ryzen 9 5900x and gtx1080ti here, does drop to 300 in some spots yes.
2021-05-08 15:01
Valve has added lots of useless models on this map that no one cares about. The map is not even graphically demanding.
2021-05-08 16:10
I don't have an high tier pc but I'm getting 35 avg on i7 3770k rx 550 while getting 150-200 avg on 1024x768
2021-05-09 03:46
#80
 | 
Austria l3v1z
I'm getting constant 300 fps on 1280x960 with gtx 970 and i7 7700k, don't understand how people with better specs have so bad fps on this map
2021-05-09 03:51
#81
 | 
Other M@GNU5
mine is around 250-300 with GTX 1660 Super and i710900k and 1440x1080 res
2021-05-09 03:55
my fps good, my pc good but not bestest
2021-05-09 04:07
#84
 | 
China HEIDASHUAi
xDDD I'm barely getting 100fps on ancient rn and it's stuttering also. It went down to 30 in some areas holy shat. I get 300+ fps on the other comp pool maps
2021-05-09 04:13
#86
Evil | 
United Kingdom pookis
Poor people roll call
2021-05-09 04:23
CPU: Amd ryzen 3600 GPU: Rx 5700 XT and i have solid 320 fps
2021-05-09 04:26
#89
 | 
Canada JC_123
I have r5 1600, EVGA 1070 ti. FPS is just as good as any other map, maybe better than some. probably average 260 or so.
2021-05-09 04:41
i5 10400f, gtx 1060 Full HD - over 200 fps It seems like a floating bug for some specs
2021-05-09 08:24
+400fps ez. buy intel+nvidia. dont AMD
2021-05-09 08:37
#98
 | 
Dominican Republic NNNumb
ryzen 5 2400 + gtx1060 3gB = 160-200fps 1920x1080 all low
2021-05-09 09:10
I never understand why every single map Valve chooses is made by someone who seemingly has a hundred hours in Hammer, they're all poorly optimised and made by amateurs who don't understand Hammer in anyway. de_mocha is 750mb, almost an entire gigabyte, how do you even manage to make a map that large?
2021-05-09 10:10
2019' 1650 Super, 1024x768 all low and barelly 35-45 fps when all other maps are ok, even Anubis (some drops to 50-55 fps though) and Cache. Very likely it's CPU bottlenecked as I have only 2cores/4threads i3-4150. Still it's enough for other competitive maps even since panorama "update".. Map has not been optimized by valve yet i think still they push this one idk why... Apollo or even Engage were far better choice imo.
2021-05-09 18:33
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.