Thread has been deleted
Last comment
device tweet
Snax | 
Germany SurfinBird 
twitter.com/dev1ce/status/13933019253035.. "We lose to anonymo, very shitty conditions and I must state my absolute fucking disappointment with faceits amateur handling of the situation. Ggwp." funny :)
2021-05-14 22:46
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
Try to play with it and then say something
2021-05-14 22:47
80 replies
#10
 | 
Poland koksuv2
it's so obvious that he's lying
2021-05-14 22:49
39 replies
that's why he said it in the beginning of map 1? 5Head
2021-05-14 22:51
29 replies
#39
 | 
Poland koksuv2
if they played 10% loss or more, they wouldn't even win the round
2021-05-14 22:52
28 replies
it was ofcourse not 30% all the time smart men
2021-05-14 22:54
27 replies
#47
 | 
Poland koksuv2
device said that they played 3 maps on 40 loss KEKW
2021-05-14 22:54
24 replies
#68
 | 
Poland COCODRILLO
source???
2021-05-14 23:01
23 replies
22 replies
#118
 | 
Poland Redend
stuck and couldn't move? XDDDDDDDDD youtube.com/watch?v=TJkHeVI0Zj0
2021-05-15 00:34
21 replies
#143
Dosia | 
Poland iOFF
XDDDD
2021-05-15 01:37
you know you don't see the lags via GOTV...
2021-05-15 10:36
17 replies
#152
 | 
Poland PHoVE
you know we would see him aim somewhere else and not directly at the enemy and hs'ing them. a
2021-05-15 10:50
15 replies
Lags would show more a slower reaction not a different aim... Thats why I said you can't see the lags. If you could see them you would be correct that they would aim in a different direction. BUT YOU CAN'T SEE LAGS hard to understand?
2021-05-15 10:53
14 replies
#154
 | 
Poland PHoVE
it wasnt ping, it was loss. you moron. and loss doesnt work in the same way as ping. the latency is the same but the 40% of the packets are lost
2021-05-15 10:54
11 replies
It is about what the GOTV shows. Not what happens in the game for the player.
2021-05-15 10:55
10 replies
#157
 | 
Poland PHoVE
do you understand the he said loss not ping, and loss is a different thing than ping. the latency is still the same but 40% of packets are lost on their way to the server, and believe me you can see that, like 4 months ago i had constant 30% packet loss and was gliding through the entire map and couldnt shoot. when my friend was spectating me he was saying that he can see the lags and that im walking into walls.
2021-05-15 10:57
9 replies
#158
 | 
Poland PHoVE
could we see this on any of the nip players? i dont think so
2021-05-15 10:59
so you know it better than pro players and casters cuz you had a friend good to know.
2021-05-15 10:59
7 replies
#160
 | 
Poland PHoVE
no because i understand how internet works.let me give you an example. a train is arriving at a station with 1000 passangers every 1 minute, but 40% of the passangers die while being on their way to the station, so the train arrives at the same time but only 600 people walk out of the train, but 1000 people walked in
2021-05-15 11:02
4 replies
#162
 | 
Poland PHoVE
thats what would happen if they had 40% loss
2021-05-15 11:02
3 replies
#163
 | 
Poland PHoVE
if it was choke thenit would be the servers fault
2021-05-15 11:03
damn, NIP internet really caused the death of 400 innocent passengers
2021-05-15 11:41
1 reply
#186
 | 
Poland PHoVE
it was just a simplified example so that jerman could understand
2021-05-15 12:15
Bruh, that's basic computer networks knowledge. You're wrong about that point. Ping translates to lags. Loss translates to loss of information (packets). They are not the same thing, not technologically and noy even practically.
2021-05-15 12:36
1 reply
#199
 | 
Poland PHoVE
True
2021-05-15 14:16
packet loss is problem in client, not server. gotv checks server, not client
2021-05-15 11:05
1 reply
#187
 | 
Poland PHoVE
yeah but when spectating you can still see them lagging off
2021-05-15 12:16
Dude, you can't be "stuck" in your client, while continuing moving around without any problems on server. It's not how it works.
2021-05-15 11:11
youtu.be/sB8MDHO0QkA Proof nip talks shit!!!🙄🙄
2021-05-15 10:43
oh stepbro im stuck
2021-05-15 14:26
What was their issue? And what does that 30% loss mean? I dont get it.
2021-05-15 12:18
1 reply
It loses 30% of the information being sent over the internet. So if someone for example is running it won't show every step they take and it will look like they teleport.
2021-05-15 12:48
Yes, guy with the most individual/team achievments + 4 majors needs to lie because he lost 1 irrelevant BO3 against random pl team xD
2021-05-14 23:28
7 replies
random pl team, most individual achievments+4majors, allright then sorry XDHHDHDHDHH
2021-05-15 00:33
1 Bo3 can decide will you play at PGL Major Stockholm 2021 or not
2021-05-15 10:55
that's why he lies? wouldn't be ashamed of losing to nonamers if he was a nonamer himself
2021-05-15 11:13
I really don't get why polish fans think he's lying
2021-05-15 11:34
"irrelevant BO3" device literally wanted to join nip to bring a major to sweden but ok man
2021-05-15 12:25
1 reply
Lose against anonymo doesn't mean they are out of major, even if they will lose their next match in LB and get eliminated it still doesn't mean they are out of major cuz there will be 2 more tournaments and they can still qualify
2021-05-15 14:10
#200
 | 
Poland PHoVE
Thats what hurts him the most, losing to a random pl team, his ego cant take it
2021-05-15 14:17
if he was lying then faceit and flashpoint would sue him for slander you idiot
2021-05-15 19:46
i didnt watch the stream with audio, what happened?
2021-05-14 22:49
39 replies
They had 40% loss and its almost unplayable
2021-05-14 22:55
38 replies
did they both have the same problems or just nip?
2021-05-14 22:56
36 replies
#57
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Nah just NiP, Anonymo was apparently unwilling to change the server obviously because it wouldn't obviously benefit them
2021-05-14 22:58
35 replies
That's very childish and unprofessional.
2021-05-14 22:59
3 replies
#127
 | 
Finland Lindeni
NiP confirmed it was Flashpoint not willing to do it, not Anonymo.
2021-05-15 00:46
2 replies
+1
2021-05-15 12:21
makes sense. LULpoint
2021-05-15 18:07
why should they have a say in this decision?
2021-05-14 23:00
10 replies
I think its in rules or some shit like that
2021-05-14 23:02
6 replies
sounds idiotic, if true its really disappointing
2021-05-14 23:03
4 replies
Yes it is…idk just when they cant move them to other server or trying to do something with that
2021-05-14 23:06
#129
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Yeah those are the rules, but Anonymo was ready to change servers and even server provider from FACEIT to something that worked but Flashpoint didn't allow it.
2021-05-15 00:48
Dude, dont believe shit like that on internet. I dont know it either but cmon its very unlikely that it is true
2021-05-15 00:51
#119 Yep, as I said you should not trust these dumb fucks on any factual information. I never understood why people talk shit they dont know nothing about.
2021-05-15 01:04
You think? I think you are a retard. Read #119 you retard
2021-05-15 01:01
snax said in a polish interview that they changed server 5 times :)
2021-05-14 23:12
2 replies
actual facts.. not allowed in hltv
2021-05-15 00:18
#128
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Changed FACEIT servers, all routed through Germany, same problem. Other non-FACEIT servers worked, Anonymo would've accepted it, Flashpoint didn't. So that's what we know about the situation now.
2021-05-15 00:47
wait what XD snax said after match that they were testing all servers in that 1 hour pause
2021-05-14 23:03
#77
 | 
Poland koksuv2
they changed servers 5 times and waited for almost an hour stop fucking lying.
2021-05-14 23:04
6 replies
#95
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Changing servers doesn't mean changing region.
2021-05-14 23:20
4 replies
#120
 | 
Poland Redend
You are right. Germany is the problem. XDD
2021-05-15 00:37
2 replies
#124
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Well yeah, all the FACEIT servers were routed through Germany so it caused the same problem.
2021-05-15 00:44
1 reply
#203
 | 
Poland PHoVE
If it was the servers fault it would be 40% choke instead of loss
2021-05-15 14:20
the region wasn't the problem. Faceit server were the problems. NIP statement made clear not Germany routing was the problem. the problem was Faceit
2021-05-15 10:41
#126
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Also now it's confirmed it was Flashpoint not willing to do it, not Anonymo.
2021-05-15 00:45
source? I believe snax said in a polish interview that they have changed servers throughout the bo3, so...
2021-05-14 23:07
5 replies
#94
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Yeah they changed servers but I don't think the region changed.
2021-05-14 23:19
4 replies
How do you know region didn't change? Don't give your opinions. Everyone did what was possible if match cant be rescheduled, NIP had option to not play.
2021-05-15 00:23
3 replies
#116
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Because that's what the casters said. And ah yes, forfeiting an important RMR match in an event that give you points to qualify for the major. HLTV logic.
2021-05-15 00:28
2 replies
twitter.com/NIP/status/13933294544039485.. Check your news MR HLTV. Forfeiting a match would not have disqualified them and it would have sent a bigger message to flashpoint people that teams wont play if server's are shitty and just like ESL did last year match should have postponed to tomorrow.
2021-05-15 00:34
1 reply
#123
 | 
Finland Lindeni
I don't use Twitter Mr. HLTV Twitter man. Forfeiting would've meant they would've lost the game anyway. And that tweet literally, LITERALLY proves what I said except the *speculation* I made that Anonymo wouldn't play on a different server because they wouldn't need to/it wouldn't benefit them. This has happened before and therefor I speculated it, never said it was a 100% factual. This isn't ESL. This also isn't a small, worthless game. This is all Flashpoint's fault, and I've previously today criticised them for being one of the worst tournament organizers throughout 1, 2 and 3.
2021-05-15 00:44
Nice you spread lies just to blame the polands. poor creature.
2021-05-15 10:38
That's not true tho based on NIP statement. Thye said they changed servers and it didnt help just as anonymo was cooperating.
2021-05-15 10:46
twitter.com/NIP/status/13933294544039485.. - Please don't spread fake information. The ones who didn't want to change the server out of their solutions was Flashpoint.
2021-05-15 11:06
It's funny because even NIP officially stated that Anonymo agreed to change servers, Flashpoint didn't. So why would you lie, hmm? To feel better about your team?
2021-05-15 11:28
stop tlking bullshit
2021-05-15 12:21
source?
2021-05-15 12:41
cristiano botaldo crying about his debut, no gla1ve, no win ://
2021-05-15 14:25
Well he did tweet that they had shitty conditions prior to the match yet they still had to play.
2021-05-14 22:47
13 replies
#16
 | 
Denmark Slathaf
+1 tbh poorly handled by faceit, but, it just sucks that they came so close even with the lags, just getting the win would have been nice :)
2021-05-14 22:49
10 replies
#20
 | 
Poland Karixen
70 frags on 30% loss? thats an obvious lie.
2021-05-14 22:50
9 replies
flag
2021-05-14 22:52
#34
 | 
Denmark Slathaf
I just don't see why they would complain then? Look at NiP player's tweets after they lose games, no excuses no nothing. So, yes I think they had problems
2021-05-14 22:52
6 replies
did they have problems? yes I believe they did ..but 16-3 win with 30/40% loss...come on its literally unplayable...and they could go off like that. its a bit questionable
2021-05-14 22:56
1 reply
Thing is till they are winning its ok, as soon as they lost, they started thrashing everyone. And mostly it could be NiP's net issues as all the teams till now have not complained anything about the server and even Anonymous guys were not having any problem. Denmark or Germany any sv could be fine for Swedish and Polish teams but god knows what happened, clearly on overpass 40% loss packets were not visible . And on mirage I saw Rez popping heads as well.
2021-05-15 00:27
#56
 | 
Poland Karixen
wasnt it device debut? he seems very mad about losing to "tier 3 team" after saying Nip is 5 steps ahead of Astralis
2021-05-14 22:57
30-40% packet loss is completely bullshit. They wouldn't have gotten a single kill if this were true.
2021-05-14 23:00
they are all together malding on twitter
2021-05-14 23:07
#204
 | 
Poland PHoVE
Theg complain cus cope
2021-05-15 14:21
Found the dipshit that doesn't know a spike is.
2021-05-15 19:46
and also the manager of nip had to reach out to faceit, and isp and even nordVPN to try to get it to get fixed, the 1 hour break pause before they obviously tried to get it fixed or something but flashpoint admin force them to play with this shitty condition.
2021-05-14 22:50
1 reply
I think that it's true the thing about loss, but don't think is 30 or 40, maybe 10. Because you can clearly see when someone has that much loss and i did not see anything that showed 40 loss
2021-05-14 22:58
what happened?
2021-05-14 22:47
twitter.com/dev1ce/status/13933061644740.. ecolai smashing keyboard right now XDDDDDDDDDDDDD
2021-05-14 22:48
6 replies
twitter.com/RLewisReports/status/1393307.. I mean I play with 12% loss everyday, and I sure as hell am better than rl so everyone kinda exaggerating
2021-05-14 22:54
4 replies
#63
 | 
Finland Lindeni
I don't believe it's 30-40% but it easily could be 15-20% which is still way too high for an important RMR match. Unacceptable.
2021-05-14 23:01
3 replies
device clarifies later that yes it wasnt 30 - 40 % always but would spike to that amount once a while which still shouldnt happen I doubt anything happens now ggs ig
2021-05-14 23:02
2 replies
#93
 | 
Finland Lindeni
That's what I was thinking, possibly it spiking up to 30-40, not being 30-40 all the time. Still unacceptable.
2021-05-14 23:18
1 reply
where i live internet is so fucked up, consistently spiking up every 10 seconds, sometimes when i peek and start spraying on guy i get teleported further away, and jiggling is impossible bc i always teleport and overextend, sometiems i cant even fucking shift
2021-05-14 23:29
richard being an idiot liek usual
2021-05-15 01:21
#5
 | 
Poland Amirek
Well he wasn't mad when he played with 30% loss on overpass when they were winning
2021-05-14 22:48
8 replies
why would he be mad lol?
2021-05-14 22:49
3 replies
#21
 | 
Poland Amirek
What I mean that if they would win 2-0 with the packet loss they probably wouldn't even say 1 more word about it, it seems like a shit excuse to me tbh, I might be wrong tho
2021-05-14 22:50
2 replies
of course they wouldn't say it because it wouldn't case them to lose, he already mentioned prior to the match that they're gonna have to play with packet loss.
2021-05-14 22:52
1 reply
#41
 | 
Poland Amirek
"it seems like a shit excuse to me tbh" that's what I mean with the #5
2021-05-14 22:53
wasn't that what the long ass technical pause was for?
2021-05-14 22:49
1 reply
#17
 | 
Poland Amirek
There was
2021-05-14 22:49
He said it even before that lol, the fact anonymo lost to that makes it seem like its not real. no way theyre that bad on overpass loool
2021-05-14 22:51
1 reply
#71
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Well they were. They had one good strat on CT and that was the start of the round, throwing that molly, smoke, flash, molly combo to playground. Insane play, that's where their creativity stopped.
2021-05-14 23:02
I win with 50% loss, because I either win or don't win they're lucky it was only 30%
2021-05-14 22:48
1 reply
lmao best comment here
2021-05-15 11:45
#7
 | 
Europe BH5K
ye, the match should have been postponed. i have played with a 5-10% packet loss, and it was almost unplayable.
2021-05-14 22:48
2 replies
you start feeling it at 1% already lol
2021-05-14 22:49
1 reply
I played 2 years on 15% loss and its playable, but unresponsive
2021-05-14 22:54
now i remember why polaks losing any relevant matches for the past few years was a good thing, forgot how cancer the fanbase was, as bad as brazilians
2021-05-14 22:48
14 replies
-1
2021-05-14 22:50
Everything checks out!
2021-05-14 22:51
brasil > połaks
2021-05-14 22:54
2 replies
+1 for porn anyway. I have no opinions about fans
2021-05-15 00:41
1 reply
Lol xD
2021-05-15 01:02
#142
 | 
Poland Berbe123
Device is making fool of himself, its his bad not PL community.
2021-05-15 01:31
8 replies
"making a fool of himself" reformedFazeIsJokeClanMens))) was right
2021-05-15 02:21
7 replies
#146
 | 
Poland Berbe123
Look at device tweet and stop being mad He said they had CONSTANT 30/40% loss on 3 maps WHICH IS UNPLAYABLE
2021-05-15 10:31
6 replies
find me the tweet where he says it was constant :)
2021-05-15 18:28
5 replies
4 replies
ok I will ask again find me the tweet where he says it was constant :)
2021-05-15 19:12
3 replies
#215
 | 
Poland Berbe123
"ALL 3 maps 40% loss" What don't you understand? ALL - used to refer to the whole quantity or extent of a particular group or thing.
2021-05-15 19:25
2 replies
so all maps = constant seems legit :)
2021-05-15 19:32
1 reply
#220
 | 
Poland Berbe123
I cant change your opinion Have a nice day :)
2021-05-16 14:51
#9
 | 
Poland r_e_x
i saw no difference in their peeks in 1st and 3rd map which as they said, was being played without any problems, i am blind i think. ALso 30% loss: youtube.com/watch?v=sB8MDHO0QkA
2021-05-14 22:50
13 replies
+1
2021-05-14 22:50
ok thats really bad, how can faceit fuck it up so bad?
2021-05-14 22:50
#27
 | 
Poland r_e_x
imagine, when on pro lvl 20ping makes difference, they keep twitting they had 30%loss which makes game UNPLAYABLE for mm player
2021-05-14 22:51
He clearly didn't have anything close to that
2021-05-14 22:54
9 replies
#49
 | 
Poland r_e_x
if he say 1or2, its possible, but why the hell he says 30XD, also they vere looking sharp as usual and 3rd, decider was played without any problems.
2021-05-14 22:55
#79
 | 
Finland Lindeni
It says in the description that that was 50%, don't know why he didn't put that in the title. Maybe because he said 40, but he said in the description it was 50.
2021-05-14 23:05
7 replies
Everyone would just not play if that was true and we all know that
2021-05-14 23:08
6 replies
#91
 | 
Finland Lindeni
So they would forfeit the match? That's what you're saying? You really think they're going to forfeit an important RMR match?
2021-05-14 23:18
5 replies
Yes. 40% packet loss is unplayable!
2021-05-14 23:18
yes lol you are delusional if you think any pro team would play 40% loss
2021-05-15 00:58
3 replies
#140
 | 
Finland Lindeni
And they did play on 30.
2021-05-15 01:25
They're handed a loss if they won't play genius
2021-05-15 11:37
1 reply
not like they would win anyways 40% loss lul
2021-05-15 12:31
Haha... crying is never a great look
2021-05-14 22:49
So really if it was Cristiano Ronaldo, they both make excuses hahaha
2021-05-14 22:50
6 replies
#25
 | 
Poland xMBTx
Penaldo
2021-05-14 22:50
xaxaxaxa
2021-05-14 22:50
+1
2021-05-14 22:56
xaxaxaxa
2021-05-14 22:56
#112
 | 
Poland malymaly
Noice one, gj
2021-05-15 00:22
#125
 | 
Poland Redend
BUT SNAX RONALDINHO OF CS youtube.com/watch?v=BL6N25CJOl8
2021-05-15 00:45
what excuses will be next... my dog knocked out my mouse cable every round
2021-05-14 22:51
1 reply
#110
 | 
Poland Menaheer
Snax ate my keyboard and gf at once
2021-05-15 00:15
COME TO ESEA!!
2021-05-14 22:51
Did they have 40% loss when they won 16-3 on Overpass?
2021-05-14 22:52
14 replies
#48
 | 
Poland rdka
ofc no dev1ce just liar. Look youtube.com/watch?v=sB8MDHO0QkA
2021-05-14 22:54
Obviously not. Packet loss is something that can come and go, and seemed like the router was faulty in this case and the packet loss became better and then worse in cycles.
2021-05-14 23:02
10 replies
they had no packet loss its easy to see they were hitting insane shots constantly
2021-05-14 23:05
8 replies
Yeah sure i guess you know every details in this case. It's possible to hit insane shots when packet loss is 0%. When the packet loss increases back to 40% it's impossible. So many times they didn't throw their nades because they couldn't, if you watched the match you should've noticed it.
2021-05-14 23:07
7 replies
i watched all 3 maps was perfectly normal
2021-05-14 23:17
6 replies
Beyond saving, that's what you are
2021-05-15 11:37
5 replies
THEY WON 16 3 STOP CRYING ALREADY if u think winning 16 3 with random 30-40% packet loss is possible at this level then u r braindead
2021-05-15 11:46
4 replies
Oh u think it's ok to play with 30% loss spikes And because they won the first map they must've not experienced any lags? Do you realize you don't see the NiP pov when you watch them, you see the observers POV, observing NiP players?
2021-05-15 11:53
3 replies
doesnt matter now, they lost it was their ISP routing problem anyway so go blame ISP
2021-05-15 12:14
2 replies
You claim CS is dead anyways in your created threads wtf wasted time on you
2021-05-15 12:53
1 reply
2019 was dead for many months
2021-05-15 14:32
I get packet loss every time I die.
2021-05-14 23:35
probably no, there was long tech pause and considering score on first map, server was fine
2021-05-14 23:05
1 reply
It could've been on their end. A faulty router could be an explanation for this.
2021-05-14 23:06
5%-10% of packet loss is literally unplayable. 30-40 is bullshit. FaceIT should release server logs for this though, if what dev1ce claims is true, then basically this whole tournament could be called bullshit on. EDIT: I'm fairly sure dev1ce is exaggerating though, if not completely bullshitting.
2021-05-14 22:53
when u lost to tier2 team hahahaha
2021-05-14 22:52
#40
 | 
Poland kaspr02
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD EZ
2021-05-14 22:53
I CANT WAIT FOR THORINS TWEET ABOUT THIS
2021-05-14 22:56
Ill fucking rather play on a consistent 300 ping than on a consistent 3% loss, let alone getting to 10 and higher lmao.
2021-05-14 22:59
So NiP > Astralis as an ORG "fucking"
2021-05-14 23:01
doubt dev1ce would lie though....
2021-05-14 23:01
1 reply
#205
 | 
Poland PHoVE
Ego much
2021-05-15 14:24
4 replies
hahahaa :D
2021-05-14 23:08
3 replies
Sounds like ESEA sabotage?
2021-05-14 23:22
2 replies
+1111 expected from ESEA two-faced toiledo!
2021-05-14 23:23
As device said, it wasn't the whole time, but rather they had spikes of loss, so they could mostly play normal. Game should've been postponed.
2021-05-14 23:08
#99
 | 
Ukraine s1vs9mple
Shitty tournament org
2021-05-14 23:23
I thought it was already a universally known fact that faceit exclusively employs imbeciles and rejects from other companies? Also fuck device
2021-05-14 23:27
I hope we get another excuses thread like with mibr in the past
2021-05-14 23:26
1 reply
Hope to see Thorin make a video about it, would be fun
2021-05-15 11:14
Something obviously had to be wrong lmao at the people saying hes just lying because hes salty. Youre not gonna put the game on pause for half an hour just to prepare an excuse in case you lose wtf kind of low iq shit is that
2021-05-15 00:27
5 replies
Sorry to say, but it isn’t flashpoint/FaceIT’s fault Packet loss like that is 99% originating from their own infrastructure. They should get dedicated lines, to combat issues like this. They pay their players what??? 40k a month? There should be money to buy a decent black fiber connection
2021-05-15 01:06
4 replies
They didnt blame them for the losses, they blame them for how they solved the problem - they refused to make a server change to fix it, and they refused to postpone the match to another time.
2021-05-15 11:02
3 replies
Tbh if it was me, i wouldn’t have done it different, i think Flashpoint handled it very business like If a player gets sick, you don’t postpone a match, either you pull out of the tournament or you let the player play. Heroic played with CadiaN and TeSeS having corona, you don’t see them complaining against losing to Na’Vi
2021-05-15 11:11
1 reply
Corona can't be dealt with by a 3rd party effectively. This could've been but Flashpoint refused to.
2021-05-15 11:39
#208
 | 
Poland PHoVE
How can changing the server change a thing that is not the servers fault, oh and btw thry changed servers multiple times, some anonymo said it on a post game interview on a polish stream after the game
2021-05-15 14:26
#137
 | 
Portugal W!LDF1RE
He recked it in map One, didn't made a difference than. He is learning with old mibr
2021-05-15 01:07
1 reply
+1
2021-05-15 11:49
$$$ >>> teamplay
2021-05-15 01:08
lmao, such a salty loser. Just take the L and prepare better for the next game.
2021-05-15 11:16
#172
 | 
Japan Misteear
KEKW
2021-05-15 11:22
noob haha
2021-05-15 11:42
didnt laugh
2021-05-15 14:11
In one tweet thay say that loss was only on map1 and map2 In another thay say it was on all 3 maps... But one thing I'm pretty sure - You can't win 16-3 with that loss
2021-05-15 19:46
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.