Thread has been deleted
Last comment
i loss 400% respect for nip
i am | 
Ecuador GODFROMSKY 
FROM 40% TO 400%
2021-05-16 20:25
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
NiP is shit thx
2021-05-16 20:25
4 replies
Justice for poland! Anonymo beat NiP already, no need to rematch
2021-05-16 21:33
3 replies
Ye they can only win when the conditions are not fair kekw
2021-05-17 14:30
2 replies
#96
 | 
Poland Pisky
NiP complained about packet loss at the beginning of the 1st map yet they won 16-3, use your brain please
2021-05-17 16:48
1 reply
+1
2021-05-17 19:00
2021-05-16 20:25
8 replies
#49
 | 
Brazil ghcnvbkn
lmfao this is really good
2021-05-16 20:58
404
2021-05-16 21:51
4 replies
#78
 | 
Czech Republic xANUx
same, i want to see it :/
2021-05-16 23:25
3 replies
put cache: infront of the url and you will see the thread mens))
2021-05-17 14:31
2 replies
#95
 | 
India somecunt
Veri nice
2021-05-17 16:41
god bless you my brazilian friend thank you so much my man all the best
2021-05-17 19:36
404 Page not found
2021-05-17 16:37
this kid pasted it in basically every single thread yesterday: imgur.com/a/5n8R4R9
2021-05-17 19:08
#3
 | 
Spain elskio
You can‘t lose something you never had??
2021-05-16 20:26
1 reply
Tbh I liked the new NiP but now I Hope they get destroyed by Anonymo in the rematch. They should just damit that they lost even though they had packet loss...
2021-05-16 21:53
#4
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Ah yes, Flashpoint's unprofessionalism = NiP's fault
2021-05-16 20:26
68 replies
#6
k0nfig | 
Finland vjlle
Literally this. I don't understand how people act like a brainless robots about this
2021-05-16 20:27
33 replies
I think it's because polish fans, similarly to brazilian ones, are so invested in their teams that they become "blind" to the actuality of the situation. Im not biased in the same way as I am a fan of the team, ingame and enjoy watching them play. The shitshow around and on social media doesnt bother me in the slightest. But also realising it was the tournaments fault. Hopefully Anonymo win, and NIP make their way up through the lower bracket into a good placement. I think that would be the best outcome.
2021-05-16 20:31
32 replies
#16
OK | 
Australia B0OMER
bro what do you mean blind, are you actually stupid? everyone beside flashpoint and Swedish fans can't see a logic behind that decision, just browse twitter
2021-05-16 20:34
25 replies
Browse twitter, check comments, look at profile pictures. You're shooting randomly, we're literally agreeing that there is no logic behind the decision THUS its Flashpoints fault?
2021-05-16 20:37
24 replies
#23
OK | 
Australia B0OMER
It was both NIP AND FLASHPOINT decision, NiP forced Flashpoint to do a rematch, and flashpoint agreed.
2021-05-16 20:38
23 replies
Proof?
2021-05-16 20:42
10 replies
#30
OK | 
Australia B0OMER
just fucking read the statement of anonymo you donkey
2021-05-16 20:42
9 replies
Holy fuck youre either just idiot or kid with special needs. Anyone can write anything they want. You just cant say to TO that "match just needs to be played again. The end" get some help m8
2021-05-16 20:47
8 replies
#41
OK | 
Australia B0OMER
You cant just announce 40 minutes before the event that you are playing a match now get some help m8 if u actually think this decision was good flashpoint wouldn't make that decision if they weren't pushed by NiP or requested, why would they want anymore issues
2021-05-16 20:49
7 replies
"Anonymo accused FACEIT, Flashpoint 3's tournament operator, of "being pressured by NIP on a business level" to order a replay, and said that they were contacted about the matter on Saturday evening, less than 24 hours before the scheduled start time of the rematch." "Anonymo accused" <-- So by this you say Nip forced flashpoint to rematch? Nah. Flashpoint is just trash
2021-05-16 20:52
6 replies
#46
OK | 
Australia B0OMER
BOTH are trash twitter.com/Flashpoint/status/1394000679.. why does nip even get to decide this is fucking crazy that things like that happen in 2021 anonymo didn't do anything wrong yet they lose the most
2021-05-16 20:52
5 replies
#57
 | 
Finland Kujis
NiP decide? By providing proof of issues with faceits server protection? :D
2021-05-16 21:31
4 replies
#63
OK | 
Australia B0OMER
bro just stfu twitter.com/RLewisReports/status/1394002.. even richard lewis noticed that
2021-05-16 21:37
3 replies
#64
 | 
Finland Kujis
Even Richard Lewis noticed that NiP wanted a rematch because of Flashpoints shitty servers? I think a 12 year old could have noticed that, it's no secret is it.
2021-05-16 21:45
2 replies
#73
OK | 
Australia B0OMER
ok, but why 2 days after the match? when anonymo already cheered because of the win? why did they decide to play the match in the first place, if they had issues? if I was nip ceo i wouldn't let my team play in that "shitty conditions" as they described
2021-05-16 23:08
#75
OK | 
Australia B0OMER
they made a statement that they accept the lose etc, but now they changed their mind. very sportsmanlike.
2021-05-16 23:10
#31
 | 
Finland Lindeni
It wasn't NiP's decision you melt, Flashpoint said they can replay it and of course NiP will press on forward with it if the joke of an organizer agrees to it.
2021-05-16 20:42
Of course NIP are forcing a rematch off Flashpoint, as they obviously feel the game was unfair and improperly allowed. Now, we don't really know how it didn't get rescheduled at 1-1 as there are many conflicting sources, however it's ultimately Flashpoints decision and they are ultimately to blame.
2021-05-16 20:43
10 replies
#34
OK | 
Australia B0OMER
Yes, and that forcing from NiP is a joke decision by them. Because of that 1 single decision, why wouldn't we rematch 10000 other matches that were played with lag, against a cheaters or anything? Just this particular one?
2021-05-16 20:44
#36
OK | 
Australia B0OMER
Rematch virtus.pro's match against kqly because he was cheating during that dust2 match
2021-05-16 20:45
8 replies
Ok now I know you're a troll. Comparing lagging in a match that was communicated during and after the match, vs a cheating player who got banned long after the matches were over and done with. Of course any other team in this situation have the same rights in NIP do. Conspiracy-theorizing otherwise is just silly.
2021-05-16 20:50
5 replies
#44
OK | 
Australia B0OMER
twitter.com/Flashpoint/status/1394000679.. NiP offered hahahaahhahahahahaahahahaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
2021-05-16 20:51
4 replies
so neither did anonymo offer? so the statement in which anonymo say they offered to reschedule was false? meaning anonymos entire statement was bs ahahaha
2021-05-16 21:51
3 replies
#72
OK | 
Australia B0OMER
you clearly have issues with reading
2021-05-16 23:06
2 replies
kindly help me then
2021-05-17 01:36
1 reply
#87
OK | 
Australia B0OMER
sorry im not kindergarten teacher
2021-05-17 14:29
#58
 | 
Finland Kujis
This just shows you know nothing off CS, KQLY was not even cheating in that match. He never cheated in a official match, lol.
2021-05-16 21:32
1 reply
Umm..nobody apart form valve &esea knows when he cheated so we can only guess because if he did cheat in vp match he had some good shit. And if you believe his story, a story of a cheater then I have no words for you
2021-05-17 02:00
the moment nip accepted to play in this conditions they dont have the right to replay the match
2021-05-16 21:36
3 replies
+1
2021-05-16 21:56
either this or forfeit for a major qualifying match? yeah right nice win win choice
2021-05-17 01:41
1 reply
we all know if the match was not played they would have the right for a reschedule. We all know they acted was we can win anyway and when that goes wrong they decided to ask for a rematch.
2021-05-17 16:27
Flashpoint fucked up for sure but why would NiP force Anonymo to replay the match. The lags weren't Anonymo's fault and FP should've postponed the match. Now Anonymo gets fucked even though this whole Drama isn't even their fault at all. And I would bet 5 bucks that when Anonymo had packet loss and NiP won, noone would care about their problems. NiP Just top powerful and Flashpoint incompetent mens((
2021-05-16 21:57
From the fact that Anonymo said in a statement that both NiP and FP are forcing them to replay the match.
2021-05-16 20:28
31 replies
#8
 | 
Finland Lindeni
There shouldn't be a replay if Flashpoint had professionalism from the get-go.
2021-05-16 20:31
30 replies
Even if FP fucked up, from Anonymo's perspective they won fair and square. Asking for a rematch is pathetic and terrible PR for both NiP and FP.
2021-05-16 20:32
29 replies
#19
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Why? NiP were in a clear disadvantage, it's not a fair win if your opponent is in a clear disadvantage. Both agreed to postpone, Flashpoint didn't allow it. This is 100% on Flashpoint, of course NiP is going to pursue any chance of a replay when they've been done dirty. You're scapegoating them for mistakes that were not theirs.
2021-05-16 20:35
28 replies
4 replies
#26
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Okay?
2021-05-16 20:39
As much as dogpoint and nip are making clowns out of themselves, snax is even bigger clown now. These arguments don't even compare.
2021-05-17 02:02
2 replies
#90
 | 
Poland Berbe123
Joke You
2021-05-17 16:01
1 reply
Except he isn't joking
2021-05-17 16:19
Yes. NiP were at a disadvantage, BUT Anonymo have every right to refuse a rematch - FP fucked up by not postponing the match when the issues couldn't be solved. Innocent even tweeted back to glaive that they keep refusing the rematch but NiP and FP dont care.
2021-05-16 20:38
22 replies
#27
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Did I ever say Anonymo had no right to say no? Of course they did. This is 100% on fucking Flashpoint. If Flashpoint is agreeing that the game should be replayed, of course NiP are agreeing to that too and wanting to pursue that. All. On. Flashpoint.
2021-05-16 20:41
21 replies
If Anonymo's accusations are true it's also on NiP.
2021-05-16 20:42
20 replies
#33
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Ultimately not. It's ALL ON FLASHPOINT. If it wasn't for FLASHPOINT we wouldn't be in this situation. It is on Flashpoint, Flashpoint only and they will be at fault for this from this day till forever. Jesus fucking Christ.
2021-05-16 20:44
19 replies
So you don't find it shady that according to the FP statement on map 3 everything was fine after the first technical timeout for NiP, then after the match they contacted FP about the lag? Why not just call another technical timeout there and then? I simply don't get it.
2021-05-16 20:45
18 replies
#40
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Yes I find it really fucking shady that they complained about it before the game, there was a one hour delay because of it after 2 rounds in the first map. Yes, so fucking shady. How dare they do this scam in the third map without complaining about it before, sore losers. Oh my god, so shady. VAC ban them.
2021-05-16 20:47
17 replies
Tell me, why did they keep playing the 3rd map if they still had those issues? Call another technical timeout and let the viewers wait a couple hours more or reschedule if you cant fix it, but to play out the 3rd map, lose, and then later ask for a rematch is so fucking shady.
2021-05-16 20:50
16 replies
#47
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Because they had already played 2 maps with this issue without it being resolved, why would've they randomly stopped the 3rd map when the problem wasn't resolved in the FIRST. " reschedule if you cant fix it" FLASHPOINT DIDN'T ALLOW IT. This is FLASHPOINTS fault.
2021-05-16 20:57
15 replies
Then protest like some teams did in a fucking Blast event by simply not playing, if you let FP pipe you then that's your own fucking fault. But now if Anonymo protests they 100% get DQ-d.
2021-05-16 20:58
14 replies
#50
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Or the match will be forfeited and they will have to play the HYENAS. Again, all Flashpoint's fault. NiP aren't at fault for this and Anonymo are the biggest losers/victims in this scenario.
2021-05-16 20:59
13 replies
12 replies
#52
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Richard Lewis who said there was packet loss, now it's phantom packet loss. Ah yes, the man who talks about integrity when he seems to have none. Sure, a big org putting pressure in a situation where they should, but it's an unfair world where the smaller org like Anonymo couldn't do the same because of their stature.
2021-05-16 21:25
11 replies
And yet NiP still doesn't take any blame, even though even you admitted in this reply that they're putting pressure on FP to replay the match even though Anonymo refuses to do so?
2021-05-16 21:26
10 replies
#55
 | 
Finland Lindeni
#27 Are you illiterate? Or slow?
2021-05-16 21:29
9 replies
So NiP pressuring FP to do the rematch, and forcing Anonymo to play it, still NiP free of blame from this fiasco...
2021-05-16 21:30
8 replies
#59
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Jesus Christ dude, how many times I have reiterate this, this is Flashpoints fault that were in this situation from the get-go. We wouldn't be in this fiasco if FLASHPOINT did things professionally. #4 #8
2021-05-16 21:32
6 replies
Sometimes in life you'll find yourself in a bad situation through no fault of your own. How you react to it will show *your* character. What happened, happened. NiP pushing for a rematch after they already lost is disgraceful
2021-05-17 17:05
5 replies
#100
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Not really, put it in their perspective. They are threatened by FP that they will be DQ'd if they don't carry on playing and delay the match any more after making it clear they have unfair disadvantage going for them. They played because they were forced to, not because they chose to. You know why this is extremely important for an organization that is the only Swedish top tier organization? The major is in... Sweden... Stockholm... It's the home major and the Swedish roster (except Device obviously) and the Swedish org get absolutely disgracefully fucked by the RMR tournament organizer. You think they're going to let go of this situation easily because they truly were fucked? Sure, Anonymo is going to be the victim of this because in theory they did nothing wrong, but they also didn't win the game fairly. They were aware that NiP had problems all game long and knew NiP's players were in a big disadvantage. It wasn't an even playing ground, it wasn't a fair playing ground. There is so much on the line for NiP and for Flashpoint to be so outrageously unprofessional can cost them their major qualification, their HOME MAJOR qualification.
2021-05-17 19:06
4 replies
Anonymo offered to reschedule the match. For me, that's enough. After the match has already been concluded, they have no obligation to give NiP the chance of a do-over. Period. Even if NiP's statements are to be believed, it's unprofessional of them to pressure Flashpoint and Anonymo for a rematch. Stuff happens. Grow some balls and play through the lower bracket, and it's not like they were eliminated by this.
2021-05-17 19:30
3 replies
#106
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Anonymo offered to reschedule, NiP agreed, Flashpoint didn't. "Grow some balls" and learn how to read more than one source. NiP aren't pressuring Flashpoint, they did what the rules said and made a complaint and it went through. This goes to Anonymo, Anonymo ask for a decision from Valve and Valve says what Flashpoint says is the way. Have a nice day, lesson of the day: do your research.
2021-05-17 19:40
2 replies
I'm just saying Anonymo did their part by offereing to reschedule. If that didn't work out, it's not on them. NiP's COO admitted to pushing for a rematch, the CEO said Flashpoint should never run an RMR again... With these PUBLIC statements, what do you think they did behind the scenes? Anonymo refused to rematch and are saying NiP is pushing them to do a rematch. They went to Valve who deferred to Flashpoint -- the guys being pressured by NiP. This is just a big org bullying a small org.
2021-05-17 19:51
1 reply
#111
 | 
Finland Lindeni
Who's blaming Anonymo? Of course he's pushing for it, he's not PRESSURING for it. There's a difference. And he's right, every single Flashpoint has been a disaster one way or another, they should never host a A-tier or S-tier tournaments ever again. They have their case for it, that's why they're pushing for it. This is all on Flashpoint, I've said it in this thread all the time. I haven't blamed NiP, Anonymo, the CEO, the players but FLASHPOINT. This is ALL on Flashpoint, like the initial comment by me states. All on them.
2021-05-17 20:39
holy fuck you are deluded as hell damm!
2021-05-17 01:48
#20
 | 
Lebanon Dogman69
what exactly is Flashpoint fault? that NIP had shit internet?
2021-05-16 20:36
1 reply
#35
 | 
Finland sant3rii
they didnt want to postpone that match
2021-05-16 20:45
good one ngl
2021-05-16 20:27
#10
 | 
Canada firtlast
rip my nip rmr stickers
2021-05-16 20:32
And you're good with numbers also
2021-05-16 20:33
XDD
2021-05-16 20:33
why?
2021-05-16 20:33
#17
REZ | 
Sweden kWahoho
same and ima NiP fan
2021-05-16 20:35
NIP KEKW
2021-05-16 20:45
match when?
2021-05-16 21:27
1 reply
#61
 | 
Poland xMBTx
never, i would go abroad for vacation for few days if i were anonymo lul
2021-05-16 21:34
when KQLY was cheating and ldlc won nobody got rematch so +1 :))
2021-05-16 21:53
1 reply
+1
2021-05-17 01:37
Tbh though idk why people are saying that NiP forced Flashpoint to replay the game. It is speculation that may very well be true but people are taking it for granted. Maybe Flashpoint wanted to replay it to appease NiP fans, or some other dumb reason that ended up costing them badly, idk, but don't take speculations for granted, especially on the internet. I do believe that NiP is full of shit by doing this. They literally stated that they accept the results and before that accepted to play in the conditions presented. Case close, but apparently not. And even after Flashpoint was given the request to replay the match, Flashpoint could've just said no. So i really think that Flashpoint is mainly at fault, but NiP isn't clean either. That's just my 50 cents And yes, i know that the reason why they accepted might be because they were coerced or bribed, but it is speculation as i said above. Ty
2021-05-16 22:00
#74
 | 
Serbia LtN))
Its neither NIP or Anonymo's fault Edit: lol, according to Anonymo tweet, they immediately offered the game to be rescheduled but NIP declined
2021-05-16 23:09
1 reply
Flashpoint declined* anonymous offer to reschedule. But when nip started crying then the flashpoint bow to nip because, well, nip is a big org. Without asking anonymous.
2021-05-17 02:04
#76
 | 
Brazil hugoooo
Same
2021-05-16 23:22
awesome username <3
2021-05-16 23:25
Jonathan E Will probably lose 404% respect in this thread later
2021-05-17 02:03
1 reply
+1
2021-05-17 16:30
lost all respect i had for anonymo . oh wait , anyways
2021-05-17 16:52
3 replies
you probably meant "oh wait I had none" but ur IQ is so low you forgot the end of your punchline wtf
2021-05-17 19:07
2 replies
youtube.com/watch?v=bxJJXQ4MkE8 mad fakeflagger , cry more
2021-05-17 19:55
1 reply
I know this meme but this was nonsense to put it here since half of your sentence was missing... Or maybe you should've said "oh no! anyways" after lost respect or "oh wait, I had none" but not both + i'm not fakeflagger et ton père le chauve en BMX
2021-05-17 20:15
Users are still blaming NiP for Flashpoint's unprofessional handling of the situation?
2021-05-17 19:34
xD
2021-05-17 19:45
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.