Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Who is to blame?
 | 
Philippines HaiHaiKazumaDesu 
Both parties are garbage at this point: Flashpoint refusing to play the match on another server. NiP crying for a rematch. I'm a fan of NiP and was supporting them when they said they had problems. But this way of solving it is so garbage.
2021-05-16 21:12
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
nip ofc, sore losers
2021-05-16 21:12
11 replies
Hey @FIFAcom can we replay Brazil vs Germany in 2014? Neymar had loss and could not play...
2021-05-16 21:16
10 replies
#51
 | 
United States habibi_exe
lmaooo +1
2021-05-16 21:29
you dont want to replay this, more national tragedies
2021-05-16 21:32
4 replies
today we would love to play against german again
2021-05-16 21:34
3 replies
no, u wouldn't 8-1 lose instead of 7-1 hahahaha
2021-05-16 21:55
2 replies
dude...they lost to North Macedonia, 2014 they were the best team in the world, but today i think anyone can win
2021-05-16 22:00
1 reply
probably lol its just a joke
2021-05-16 22:04
isnt this shoowtime tweet
2021-05-16 21:50
1 reply
it's yel's actually
2021-05-17 03:44
#142
 | 
Brazil yakd
More like one side of the field is unplayable because of rain
2021-05-16 22:18
lol. much love to brazil from germany. for this comment i let you have that world championship title. :D
2021-05-17 02:58
it's just a game bro
2021-05-16 21:12
3 replies
anonymo seems to be massively afraid of a rematch? why?
2021-05-16 22:41
2 replies
dunno dude
2021-05-16 22:42
Anonymo is the underdog here, sure they might upset a top team once in awhile but its not consistently so its basically giving the win to NiP right now and its really unfair especially with less than 24 hours to properly respond for the rematch thus its so obvious that flashpoint is in fault here from not taking the right decision when it happened and for getting pressured by NiP(which i believe so because the decision flashpoint takes).
2021-05-17 03:20
#3
 | 
Italy JohnnotCena
NIP and trashpoint RMR Points btw i hope valve will fix this fast
2021-05-16 21:12
2 replies
I don't know why but I can't trust valve to do it haha we should ask Riot Game's opinion on this matter Kappa
2021-05-16 21:13
Valve is not a T.O. they have no idea how to run a tournament and according to NIP's statement Valve already said Flashpoint's word is final
2021-05-17 10:09
#4
 | 
Nigeria STFU_M8
not nip. You cant play with 40% loss in major qualifier, the biggest tournament for cs. Maybe anonymo or flashpoint are the fault but not nip
2021-05-16 21:13
38 replies
11 replies
elige is right
2021-05-16 21:15
absolutely right. if u play the game with 40% loss ur stupid idiot.
2021-05-16 21:15
4 replies
Uhm they didn't have 40 % loss,j ust lying. It's impossible to play with that kind of lag.
2021-05-16 21:34
3 replies
that's what dev0ce said
2021-05-16 21:46
2 replies
yes, because he has no honor
2021-05-16 21:47
1 reply
Left Astralul for NiP and now he's crying cause he lost a match against tier 23
2021-05-16 21:48
+1 what a god
2021-05-16 21:18
#31
try | 
Argentina Joedash
+1
2021-05-16 21:20
#42
 | 
Sweden tjevy
+1
2021-05-16 21:23
#45
 | 
China HEIDASHUAi
+1
2021-05-16 21:25
Based
2021-05-16 21:31
the moment nip accepted to play the match they dont have the right to ask a rematch
2021-05-16 21:14
19 replies
"forced" is what they used now "forced" is what anonymo is using
2021-05-16 21:14
18 replies
yeah, "forced" look like a excuse, we all know if the match was not played they would have the right for a reschedule. We all know they acted was we can win anyway and when that goes wrong they decided to ask for a rematch. anonymo is the weak link between the 3, so its easy to be forced. we all know most wrong here is flashpoint to not reschedule the match or solve the problem and now forcing to do rematch. But Nip asking a rematch its wrong too, because the moment they accepted to play they accepted the condition they are playing.
2021-05-16 21:25
17 replies
"we all know" lul delusional much
2021-05-16 21:27
16 replies
just look the rules of the flashpoint, they have a clear point what happens if theres a connection problem in the competition
2021-05-16 21:29
7 replies
and may I know this rule you are referring? I still think people assume too much
2021-05-16 21:42
6 replies
i think its this one: liquipedia.net/commons/images/0/00/Flash.. i didnt find the original in the site of the flashpoint.
2021-05-16 21:50
5 replies
it clearly says if its beyond the control of the teams then the match will be replayed
2021-05-16 21:53
4 replies
"If a Match is interrupted" --> because they played they shouldnt be have the right to replay. so they would have the right if they didnt accepted to play the match in this condition, because they decided to play the match was never interrupted.
2021-05-16 21:58
3 replies
if they decided to not play then they would have been given an auto loss thats in the rules too
2021-05-16 22:00
2 replies
the same documents they sent to get a rematch would be enough to explain why the match was interrupted and get the reeschedule. but its not enough to get a rematch, because the match was never interrupted so accepting they have enough condition to have a match. flashpoint just accepting because its NIP, theres nothing in the regulation would ensures a rematch
2021-05-16 22:09
1 reply
you are prolly right I am tired mens have a nice day))
2021-05-16 22:11
He is right tho, flashpoint should have said we postpone the match untill network issue's are resolved. NiP would be happy and Anonymo already said they would not have minded that. Now its just a shitshow. I am NIP fanboi but Anonymo should just get the win here
2021-05-16 21:38
7 replies
ik and I agree flashpoint handled it pretty badly, but heres the thing I dont think its completely unreasonable for nip to ask for a rematch, now I dunno how they managed to convince FP or whatever but yes its is kinda unfair to anonymo but yes it is also kinda unfair to nip
2021-05-16 21:44
6 replies
I totally agree with you and get why NIP want a rematch. NIP should have asked for a rematch at a later date right when it happened, it is to late now. Besides NIP could just have made a good lower bracket run anyway thats why I dont understand the salty tears 2 days after the fact
2021-05-16 21:50
5 replies
flashpoint deciding 2 days after doesnt mean nip asked them 2 days after it very well could be flashpoint taking the time to process it
2021-05-16 21:54
4 replies
Oh yeah I get what you mean and if that is the case the right thing for NIP to do imo is to just say let it go, match is over Anonymo won. We will prove ourselfs in the lower bracket. I love NIP since cs 1.6 and that wont change but this is kinda shit from the org. This is just my opinion tho :p
2021-05-16 21:56
3 replies
I cant say I dont agree, I thought they let it go but if the TO itself cant stick with a point they themselves make then such shit is bound to happen hope they decide on something good
2021-05-16 21:59
2 replies
exactly, I think the NIP business side is pushing flashpoint a bit but flashpoint should have a spine and just say: We made a mistake but whats done is done we move on. This whole thing is just a complete fiasco now
2021-05-16 22:01
1 reply
#151
 | 
Brazil yakd
Well its rmr points for a major, if nip actually said they dont want to play mid match they have every right to complain now. Sure anonymo won but if its by having a big advantage over a team its understandable for them to ask for a rematch. In the end the better team will win, if i was nip and i strongly believe i had no choice i would down right forfeit the whole tournament
2021-05-16 22:35
anonymo is definitely not at fault here tho they are kinda the victims here
2021-05-16 21:14
15 yo kid :D..... trying to look cool by baiting :D
2021-05-16 21:41
2 replies
He is not wrong, however, if they are in the right and exert pressure in search of justice they are not competely wrong as well. NiP are saying anonymo's management were looking to ways to dq nip, anonymo are saying nip pressured fp to rematch, without the complete knowledge and behind the scenes shit we cant really say what's right and wrong. Anonymo pulled a great game and would be harshly punish if they have to replay. NiP undeservedly played in dogshit conditions and are already punished. Every solution would hurt at least one team. In order to avoid precedents and crappy drama fuck nip (i mean lesser of the 2 bads) and sue flashpoint or just fine them bigtime. Either way dragging the players' names in the mudd because of the orgs' managements greedy fuckery is wrong.
2021-05-17 03:45
1 reply
true the best thing at this point would be to move on if anonymo has to replay it is another wrong from flashpoint and 2 wrongs dont make a right. Both sides learned one thing never give flashpoint another tier 1 tournament especially anything related to majors.
2021-05-17 10:05
this man's legit said it might be anonymo's fault kekw
2021-05-17 03:47
Flashpoint were the main offender in the first place
2021-05-16 21:13
1 reply
+1
2021-05-16 21:28
mainly flashpoint because they can't deliver a good tournament and because they lack a spine nip for crying after accepting to continue (if that's true)
2021-05-16 21:13
5 replies
apparently flashpoint "forced" them to play cuz only they had the issue so they thought it was nip's fault
2021-05-16 21:20
4 replies
thats when you call the csppa and say we wont play under these condition, not play the game hope you win and if you lose go cry faceit tested with a different server and found that it was no loss for nip or anonymus on the third party server but still said they have to play on their servers
2021-05-16 21:39
3 replies
faceit tested with a different server and found that it was no loss for nip or anonymus on the third party server but still said they have to play on their servers - pbs.twimg.com/media/E1h2lpiVIAISM5C?form..
2021-05-16 21:51
that is if the CSPPA accually did anything at all
2021-05-16 21:52
1 reply
maybe if they contacted the csppa they could actually do something for the first time ever
2021-05-16 22:34
what other solution do you propose?
2021-05-16 21:13
2 replies
Accepting the defeat and moving on
2021-05-16 22:23
1 reply
y should they compromise?
2021-05-16 22:24
#10
 | 
United States NABOT
BlameF
2021-05-16 21:13
#15
 | 
Portugal migboss
trashpoint
2021-05-16 21:14
So think like that, you are getting an online exam and cant make it because of server issues. You would just let it go? I dont think so mate.
2021-05-16 21:14
19 replies
#24
 | 
India iamindian
Correction : So think like that, you are getting an online exam and fail because you didnt study. Why wouldnt you let it go? I dont think so mate.
2021-05-16 21:17
14 replies
Correction, really? You can't understand what you read it seems. NIP came with proof and Flashpoint accepted it was because of server security settings.
2021-05-16 21:19
12 replies
#33
 | 
India iamindian
Where is the proof of 40 percent loss ? Can you provide it please ? Delusional i guess np .
2021-05-16 21:21
11 replies
twitter.com/Flashpoint/status/1393994557.. Just read last sentence kiddo. First photo.
2021-05-16 21:28
2 replies
#52
 | 
Reunion Esquinox
didn't RL looked the logs and it was said that it was only up to 30% ?
2021-05-16 21:30
1 reply
#56
 | 
Asia loveall
I don't think the numbers matter, even 10% is unplayable, you may know if you came across bad internet ever, but yeah there should be no rematch, anonymo is not at fault.
2021-05-16 21:32
#50
 | 
Asia loveall
They had loss, no question about that, but they can't just have a rematch, they should've stopped playing at that time only and looked for better solution.
2021-05-16 21:29
7 replies
#54
 | 
India iamindian
Ok lets agree that they had 40 percent packetloss . Why they did agree to play the game with the same shit conditions in the first place ?
2021-05-16 21:31
6 replies
#57
 | 
Asia loveall
Yes that's what I am saying, they should've stopped playing. They shouldn't have a rematch for that.
2021-05-16 21:33
1 reply
#61
 | 
India iamindian
Yes man . Pathetic situation . For such a new team like anonymo to get a victory and then this happens , what a heartbreak it will be. Feel sad for anonymo
2021-05-16 21:35
#99
 | 
Nigeria coolathan
How do you propose they do not "agree to play the game with shit conditions" when Trashpoint forces them to play the match?
2021-05-16 21:51
3 replies
#111
 | 
India iamindian
Because they thought they can over run anonymo even with issues. Overconfidence comes back to haunt them
2021-05-16 21:56
2 replies
#123
 | 
Nigeria coolathan
How do you propose they do not "agree to play the game with shit conditions" when Trashpoint forces them to play the match? "Because they thought they can over run anonymo even with issues." Maybe try using google translate?
2021-05-16 22:02
1 reply
#161
 | 
India iamindian
Didnt understand what you are saying third world country?
2021-05-17 02:55
mfw it’s your fault for getting server issues
2021-05-16 21:19
#30
 | 
Poland Amirek
If you have an online exam and you can't make it because of server issues you contact somebody responsible for this and they either fix it or postpone the exam, not let you do it with connection issues and then replay it days later
2021-05-16 21:20
2 replies
true, but apparently the "exam" proctor (flashpoint) said no, and said to nip to take it anyways cuz only nip had the issue and no one else lmao
2021-05-16 21:22
This is what Dev1ce said, right? They contacted with admins to fix problem or postpone. Think like that, you sent a message to your professor and said you have issues about exam servers. What would you do if your professor refuse you? Just shut up and sit?
2021-05-16 21:23
You can let it go when you have an option of postponing the exams because you have internet issues :D
2021-05-16 21:43
Only flashpoint is to blame. They should have allowed the re-scheduling of the game. After they made that mistake, then they should have denied NiP's request to replay the match. But they fucked up two times and look like complete clowns now. NiP's handing in that replay request is not something you can blame them for imo, they also got hard done by in the first place.
2021-05-16 21:15
5 replies
Lag must have been terrible if they can win 16-3 on overpass (with 40 % loss)
2021-05-16 21:37
1 reply
The 40% loss were spikes, not all throughout. On a strategic map like ovp you can win easily just by outplaying your opponent on the map, even if lag spikes disrupt your game. Anonymo played like they had no clue on ovp
2021-05-16 21:41
Flashpoint didn't refuse to reschedule the match, they simply didn't get any request from any team... imgur.com/a/LhuL8YP Meanwhile, anonymo asked NIP and not flashpoint for a reschedule but NIP declined. imgur.com/a/iBekdde So, its 50% NIP fault, 50% flashpoint's not just flashpoint but the only one suffering is anonymo First image is from flashpoint's tweet, second from anonymo's tweet
2021-05-16 21:55
2 replies
#105
 | 
Nigeria coolathan
Are those super cropped pics from a Trashpoint statement? Sounds more like its from Anonymo
2021-05-16 21:53
1 reply
First image is from flashpoint's tweet, second from anonymo's tweet
2021-05-16 21:54
Nip and trash point
2021-05-16 21:15
#23
 | 
Poland xMBTx
Im angry as a competitive person. I have some empathy for Anonymo #JusticeForAnonymo
2021-05-16 21:16
i blame flashpoint, pretty sure both sides offered solutions when it was 1-1 in the first map but they didn't fix the problem and just continued the match
2021-05-16 21:18
I mean, obviously NIP are crying for a rematch when the issue was out of their control. I haven't heard a good reason on why they are at fault.
2021-05-16 21:19
16 replies
It was in their control. They should have gotten a different isp.
2021-05-16 21:38
15 replies
According to flashpoint themselves "The issue seemed to be related with some security settings on the server that partially blocked traffic from the NIP connection/ISP therefore it was not something they could control and solve" What were they supposed to do? Say "Hold up guys, let us change ISP real quick"?
2021-05-16 21:45
14 replies
XD they got it literally on every server except sweidhs ones, so yea, they hsould have had that covered
2021-05-16 21:47
13 replies
Do you know what an ISP is? They would have to, cancel their current deal with their current ISP, get a new deal with a new ISP and set up their internet all on the same day.
2021-05-16 21:51
12 replies
it wasnt particualr server, they must have had these issues before the match happened.
2021-05-16 21:52
11 replies
What are you talking about? The issue was caused by Flashpoints improper settings. The only way to fix it would be to 1. Get a new ISP, which would need the match to be rescheduled or 2. Have flashpoint change their settings.
2021-05-16 21:57
10 replies
Uhm. No. It was NiP's fault and they could be in control of it. And yes, even fucking streamers have two ISP's hooked up at once as a back up if one of the provider's net died. Probably should have that in a fucking bootcamp. Also, it was faceit server. They had to have this issue in the past as well.
2021-05-16 22:09
9 replies
It. Was. Not. NiP's. Fault. Flashpoint. Said. So. Themselves. NiP were not at fault no matter how many times you say it.
2021-05-16 22:10
8 replies
you are so delusional. flag checks out tho.
2021-05-16 22:14
7 replies
Delusional = Checks out with facts Alright got it.
2021-05-16 22:16
6 replies
2021-05-16 22:24
5 replies
Oh my god. EliGE bringing out his brainlet takes here.
2021-05-16 22:26
4 replies
Malding?
2021-05-16 22:38
3 replies
Yeah sure, I am malding. Because EliGE had to turn off his brain for a second to write this tweet.
2021-05-16 22:39
2 replies
Malding for sure. Just take a deep breath and chill for a sec. Let flashpoint take care of nip and feed them like a baby.
2021-05-16 22:40
1 reply
Sorry bro. I've just been getting irritated at all these dumbasses thinking that the game shouldn't be replayed. I'll try to calm down.
2021-05-16 22:43
Trashpoint, not NiP
2021-05-16 21:22
Flashpoint's fault. Both teams offered to reschedule or play on a different server and Flashpoint refused. I don't think it should be replayed though, too late to make that decision when NIP had another game they were supposed to be playing right now.
2021-05-16 21:22
1 reply
Flashpoint says non of the team asked for rescheduling. I mean you can assume a good TO would offer it, but that isn't the point here.
2021-05-16 21:51
#37
 | 
Germany Ryuzth
Trashpoint, and also NiP now for being sore losers
2021-05-16 21:23
flashpoint 100%, nip people just dislike for some reason but I do not think they are at fault with the present facts
2021-05-16 21:23
1 reply
EXACTLY. Thank you lol, finally someone that thinks the same way as me lol.
2021-05-16 21:36
NiP for continue to argue after the macth was over flashpoint/faceit not accpeting rematch until almsot two full days after the match was finished Anonymo for winning i guess
2021-05-16 21:23
#41
syrsoN | 
Bosnia and Herzegovina dc4
NiP for not asking a re-schedule during the tech pause!! #CancelNIP
2021-05-16 21:23
6 replies
but they did? In NiP's initial statement I believe they claimed both teams agreed on rescheduling/postponing, but flashpoint rejected the proposal and forced them to play anyways.
2021-05-16 21:35
3 replies
#62
syrsoN | 
Bosnia and Herzegovina dc4
Flashpoint statement claims neither team asked for an official reschedule during the 1 hour tech pause. NiP have changed their side of the story 3-4 times now
2021-05-16 21:36
2 replies
Oh ok, so one of them is lying. NiP acting shady by changing the story, but it also wouldn't surprise me if flashpoint were the ones lying.
2021-05-16 21:41
1 reply
#88
syrsoN | 
Bosnia and Herzegovina dc4
Even dev1ce deleted his tweet where he was thanking NordVPN and another provider for solving their packet loss issue. Some shady stuff is going on here.
2021-05-16 21:48
Flashpoint forced nip to play the game, not nip asking re-schedule. Both teams agreed to re-schedule.
2021-05-16 21:36
1 reply
#79
syrsoN | 
Bosnia and Herzegovina dc4
twitter.com/Flashpoint/status/1393994557.. "No official request to reschedule the match was made by either side" After that they were "forced" to play on the german servers because it would've been unfair to Anonymo if they played on a swedish server.
2021-05-16 21:44
Trashpoint and NIP is having a PR managment scandal at their hands
2021-05-16 21:24
#65
 | 
Sweden drakendilf
POLISH lies and propaganda all over HLTV twitter and reddit, ban ananymo from CS GO pro scence
2021-05-16 21:36
Flashpoint. Seems like they forced NIP to play
2021-05-16 21:38
blameF
2021-05-16 21:43
#83
 | 
Russia NOD777
Nip have proven connection issues weren’t in their control. Read the article. Imagine your guns fire 2 times slower and everything register only in 50% of time. You would rage quit immediately. Everyone who blames nip doesn’t have a brain
2021-05-16 21:46
14 replies
you can't blame NIP for Flashpoint decision on that day. but to play a whole bo3 and then cry for a rematch that is all on NIP.
2021-05-16 21:48
11 replies
#92
 | 
Russia NOD777
You can’t just don’t play it. You would be disqualified
2021-05-16 21:49
10 replies
NIP never asked for rescheduling. At least Flashpoint says that...
2021-05-16 21:50
9 replies
#106
 | 
Russia NOD777
What happened was extraordinary. In situations like that is better to “follow” the rules and only then try to understand what should be done
2021-05-16 21:53
8 replies
a rematch isn't sth you write in your rule book. We have online csgo Internet or server issue should always be considered. Flashpoint had 3 option. reschedule, play on non-faceit server, or play it. They decided to play it. So with that decision, they also signed "what ever happens this is the bo3". In football, it is called factual decision. The bo3 is done... I mean even Fnatic with Olofboost understand the issue here.
2021-05-16 21:59
7 replies
#121
 | 
Russia NOD777
But rematch is exactly what should be in rules. What’s the point of rulebooks then?
2021-05-16 22:00
6 replies
why should a rematch be considered? when you play it to the end it is done. Why do you believe ESL made such a decision to play 1 map on another day? Cuz a good TO want to do everything to prevent a rematch. Flashpoint did not everything to prevent it, but NIP neither. Even if it isn't NIP fault with server issues. It is their fault to not ask for rescheduling. With this, they accepted fully that they play the bo3 and not ask for a rematch afterwards.
2021-05-16 22:04
5 replies
#134
 | 
Russia NOD777
Why? To prevent what happened. Rulebook was obviously weak. And nip has every right to defend their point. Anonymo has theirs. Admins decided that nip’s point was stronger. And maybe nip wouldn’t won this stand about rematch if they start immediately breaking the rules and asking for reschedule without gathering evidence
2021-05-16 22:10
4 replies
you have 0 arguments for NIP side. When you play the full bo3 and don't ask for rescheduling you have forfeited any right to complain or ask for a rematch.
2021-05-16 22:12
3 replies
#141
 | 
Russia NOD777
Gladly it isn’t works like that. “You decided to speak about rape after 5 years? You forfeited any right to complain”
2021-05-16 22:16
2 replies
Actually, most crimes have a prescription. So at some point, it is too late. But we talk here about sports. In sports what happens during a match is a factual decision. So your example is bullshit in all possible ways.
2021-05-16 22:20
1 reply
#146
 | 
Russia NOD777
We already have so many rounds rounds replayed because a player had issues. I remember astralis replayed whole pistol round and maybe it was in major. So why we can replay a round because of connection issues and not a match? Just because admins were wrong to force players to play? Is this example a bs?
2021-05-16 22:24
Yeah, but you can't just go like: "Let's just play against weaker opponent and if we happen to lose we will just demand rematch" If org as big as NIP refused to play because of the connection problems flashpoint would have allowed them to reschedule.
2021-05-16 22:03
1 reply
#128
 | 
Russia NOD777
We can only speculate at this point
2021-05-16 22:04
for this situation now only NIP to blame.
2021-05-16 21:47
If it's to be believed that Anonymo was pushing for a disqualification at the time as per what FACEIT told Hicham then I think I can't really blame NiP for pushing for it after the fact, especially since it was also a technical timeout during the 1 hour so that means they shouldn't have been allowed to communicate between the org and players to settle what was happening during the match. Kind of just a messed up situation at this point.
2021-05-16 21:50
1 reply
#116
 | 
Poland kad_xqd13
Anonymo loses all the time to tier 5 teams, they had one fluke tier 2 win coz nip had connection issues and yet they are so arrogant. Humble up nonamers imo.
2021-05-16 21:58
NIP, the only thing he had to do was disgust to play in those situations and not to repeat it again, you are going to play with hyenas, total, you are going to beat him, but nip has only stained his image
2021-05-16 21:51
#114
 | 
Luxembourg TheBudi34
crybaby dev40ce
2021-05-16 21:57
blameF ofc
2021-05-16 22:02
1.NIP refuse to postpone the match at the begining cuz they never thought they could've lose it. 2.flashpoint refuse the match to be played on another server while both teams agree. 3.Anonymo did nothing wrong. lost all respect for device AKA TOM CRIES
2021-05-16 22:04
1 reply
#131
 | 
France tyty1190
In start NIP propose to postponed the match but flashpoint refuse.
2021-05-16 22:08
It's Flashpoint's fault. NIP said in their statement they were forced to play by Flashpoint. There's no way NIP would have refused a reschedule at the time if it was offered. It should have been rescheduled after 2 rounds and there wouldn't be a problem. NIP are completely entitled to present evidence of their problems and make that appeal. Flashpoint messed up and now they're trying to cover their asses by playing it again. I do feel sorry for Anonymo in all this.
2021-05-16 22:04
Flashpoint, obviously.
2021-05-16 22:35
NIP and Flashpoint. But NIP should do the bigger thing and forfeit like fnatic did in dreamhack winter
2021-05-16 22:40
2 replies
#159
 | 
Serbia LtN))
+1
2021-05-16 22:42
+1 this, be the bigger guy
2021-05-17 03:22
#158
 | 
Serbia LtN))
Flashpoint
2021-05-16 22:42
BlameF(lashpoint)
2021-05-17 03:29
anonymo is to be blamed: 1) They shouldn't have won - as NIP expected to win regardless 2) Too much banter escalating the whole situation. If anonymo had lost, then NIP wouldn't be complaining and we wouldn't be in this situation.
2021-05-17 03:34
Trashpoint ofc. But i'm wondering what forced them to make this decision? Did nip rly cried this much? Did they pay for this rematch? Or was it on trashpoint' mind only? Bcs the fact is if it would've been anonymo instead of nip, no one would've give a shit. Literally. No rematch, nothing.
2021-05-17 10:10
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.