Thread has been deleted
Last comment
twitter.com/NIP/status/13940549248964403.. NIP did nothing wrong. Only FLASHPOINT is to blame for blocking from NIP players resulting in packet loss. This match should be replayed.
2021-05-17 01:29
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
I have been saying this shit all day long lmao. Sad that I have legit spent like 3 hours on HLTV today, I got way too invested into this shit. Yes I am really biased, but I truly think people have been giving waaaaay too much shit on NiP for this. Glad that the opinion is shifting and more and more people are realizing that flashpoint are the only ones who should be blamed for this shitshow.
2021-05-17 01:31
19 replies
HLTV/twitter/reddit users have a hivemind mentality.
2021-05-17 01:32
#3
 | 
Belgium Woke!
same
2021-05-17 01:32
+1 it’s ridiculous
2021-05-17 01:33
#11
 | 
Australia B_Tannen
True but it wasn’t mature for the CEO to directly blame lag for losing them maps 2 and 3. The players handled it much better, at least publicly.
2021-05-17 01:35
1 reply
+1 I find the NIP's comms was super unprofessional, specially the first one.
2021-05-17 01:37
#12
device | 
Denmark JKTP
Well there are problems with what Flashpoint and NIP are saying The VPN SHOULD have solved the problem and that's something that people who know a lot more about it are saying. So the problem is most likely that Flashpoint don't really know what went wrong.
2021-05-17 01:35
1 reply
#127
 | 
Germany yannxbr
There is a thread about what the issue was but it’s probably lost in the depths of hltv. Something with Esl admins
2021-05-17 12:33
many bored children in quarantine...
2021-05-17 01:36
+1 not like if anonymo would be lagging the whole time they wouldnnt complain and try to get it resolved or what? They would be fine with unfair advantage?? They would say something like "this is NIP ddosing on purpose to have better Dev1ce debut!!!" lmfao
2021-05-17 08:55
They are pure trolls and dont give a shit about justice or anything. They are making fun and memes. %60 Anonymo flairs in hltv dont know anything about case and just baited by twitter. So relax man :)
2021-05-17 09:12
1 reply
#36
 | 
United States Americah!
+1
2021-05-17 09:14
#35
 | 
United States Americah!
+1
2021-05-17 09:14
NiP shouldn't ask for replay anyway. The situation now shifted from NiP being punished to them having a second chance at a already once lost match and Anonymo eating shit. I understand they feel bad about it, bad pressuring Anonymo for a rematch without them having a say in is just bad sportsmanship.
2021-05-17 09:17
1 reply
well nip asked flashpoint if they can check if it was a match integrity while at the same time asking for a replay. flashpoint agreed and looked into things and found that it was a match integrity fault so their replay wish was accepted and now flashpoint is forcing it on anonymo instead of nip
2021-05-17 09:37
#62
NiKo | 
Sweden Rifile
true. also don't get too invested cus i usually become like that against Niko haters and it's pretty deppressing
2021-05-17 09:48
People are mad because everyone know what would happen if anonymo was in the same situation. There is no replay and nobody would care.
2021-05-17 10:03
3 replies
There is no way in knowing that it wouldn't be the same if it had happened to Anonymo so speculating that is just wrong och childish. Flashpoint is at fault here and Anonymo had an advantage that NIP can't be blamed for. Rematch is the only fair outcome since Anonymo didn't win fair and square.
2021-05-17 10:31
Idk about that, less people would Care for sure but idk about "there would be no Replay". The reason for a Replay happening is because according to the rulebook, you can send in requests to investigate if there was a lack of competitive integrity during the match and if it severely impacted One of the teams. NiP did a request, sent in proof of the severity of the lags and also their own conclusions about whos fault the lag was. Flashpoint did their own investigation and came to the conclusion that it was faceits servers causing the issue. They then deemed that the competitive integrity had been Lost in this game, one of the teams being forced to play a BO3 with major lags due to the tournament organizers servers. If roles were reversed and Anonymo sent in a request for flashpoint to investigate, i wouldnt be surprised if a rematch would happen as well
2021-05-17 14:19
1 reply
Bruh you both Swedish :D but congs, u got the W and crown of most hated organization.
2021-05-18 22:13
Flashpoint is at fault here. However, replaying the match and invalidating Anonymo's work id dimply not viable. Do you ever see a football match get replayed because idk Maradona used his hand to score a goal? NiP played on when they were clearly disadvantaged. No-one would have blamed them for refusing to play under these conditions, and yet they chose to proceed.
2021-05-17 01:33
42 replies
#8
 | 
Belgium Woke!
they were forced to play
2021-05-17 01:34
30 replies
No they weren't. There wasn't a guy with a knife standing behind them. They could have refused to play, and we know the reaction from the community would have been devastating to Flashpoint if they DQd NiP for this
2021-05-17 01:36
27 replies
+1 If they did chosse to forfait because of lagging, imagine the shame for Flashpoint or Faceit. But It was the player's decision, they cannot talk to anybody during the match. It's hard to take that kind of decision. You can tell NIP's players are still young.
2021-05-17 01:42
1 reply
To be fair it's a very tough decision for their players, but at least they can apply for a reschedule before completing the match
2021-05-17 09:31
If NIP didn’t play, ppl like you would be sitting here saying “they chose to forfeit, so now they should accept the loss” NIP was put in an impossible situation and chose the only option that gave them a chance to win. Haters like you would be all over them no matter what.
2021-05-17 08:54
19 replies
+1 this is probably what would happen. IDEK why these guys dont want a fair game? not talking about anonymo im talking about HLTV guys lol
2021-05-17 09:06
#38
 | 
United States Shr3y
So now instead you are taking a hard victory away from an innocent team. Very justifiable!
2021-05-17 09:17
7 replies
If the lag didn't cost NiP the game and anonymo was the better team... then they shouldn't have much of an issue winning without those issues
2021-05-17 09:40
4 replies
#74
 | 
United States Shr3y
That's such a bad argument. CS is so random, bytthat logicNaVi should have never lost against entropiq yesterda.
2021-05-17 09:55
3 replies
You're saying that flashpoint is taking away a hard victory from anonymo. Why would a match that anonymo won by the skin of their teeth because NiP players had awful lag issues caused by Flashpoint be considered a legitimate victory?
2021-05-17 10:05
2 replies
#90
 | 
United States Shr3y
They agreed to forfeit after 2 rounds into bo3, after that they played and won fair n square. Why should trashpoint's shitty decision to continue to play is not punished, but anonymo are clearly getting screwed over, when they clearly did everything right in that case.
2021-05-17 10:08
1 reply
No, they did not agree to "forfeit" lmfao. Anonymo's management tried to pressure Flashpoint into DQing NiP if they try to delay the match, thus forcing NiP to play with dogshit internet. That's not "everything right". They should have asked flashpoint to reschedule the match instead of refusing to reschedule.
2021-05-17 11:05
Both teams got fucked over by Flashpoint. But why are ppl mad at NIP and not Flashpoint. Anonymo was ok to reschedule, why is it suddenly an issue? Just look at it like the best scrim they ever had.
2021-05-17 09:44
1 reply
#78
 | 
United States Shr3y
They were "OK" to reschedule when it was 2 rounds into the bo3, They have made multiple tweets on their official Twitter about how they are forced "now" by TO to reschedule the match as nip wants it.
2021-05-17 09:56
No I'd be going at Flashpoint for their inability to provide a fair playing field
2021-05-17 09:26
9 replies
Which is still the case. If anything Anonymo just got probably their best scrim ever since I doubt they usually get to practice teams of this caliber. Both teams are the victims here, direct your anger at the culprit, Flashpoint
2021-05-17 09:43
8 replies
Wisla used to play pcw against navi, vitality etc, Anonymo is lower in hltv ranking atm but snax and innocent are pretty known in T1 scene so they might get a chance to practice against teams of this caliber.
2021-05-17 09:49
7 replies
Really beside the point, but sure. What matters is Flashpoint fucked both teams over, but only NIP are getting hate.
2021-05-17 09:51
6 replies
"I doubt they usually get to practice teams of this caliber." I just answered this sentence, cba discussing who is responsible for this situation for the 14th time in last 2 days
2021-05-17 09:52
5 replies
Fair enough, and yes since it’s a well proven fact that all the blame is on Flashpoint and that both teams are victims here it should be no need to discuss it. Sadly the average IQ of ppl on the site means that facts doesn’t matter.
2021-05-17 09:56
4 replies
Seems like u haven't seen IQ of polish people, it's even worse XD No matter what, fuck nip and it's only their fault
2021-05-17 09:58
3 replies
Flashpoint confirmed the issues were server side and only effecting NIP. Flashpoint confirmed they forced NIP to play on the designated server, even though both teams were ok with different server or a postponement. How is NIP to blame here?
2021-05-17 10:18
2 replies
Ask polish people, their IQ is too low to understand that. They think NIP paid flashpoint under table to say that xD
2021-05-17 10:27
1 reply
I’m sorry, I misread your post as you saying it’s all NIP a fault. After rereading it I understand what you meant.
2021-05-17 11:22
You can say that now when trashpoint accepted the blame. However there is big chance that if nip took dq then nobody would have investigated the situation and just released a statement that problem was on nip side of connection. When you play, you have demo, possibly footage of recorded screen where you can count how many times you lagged, probably network statistics from your cs client to server, I dont know the details. My point is that if nip took dq, they would not have any more evidence than they had at the point of tech timeout and obviously these things were not sufficient enough for trashpoint to postpone the match. So why do you think that situation would have ended up in removing dq and playing the match.
2021-05-17 10:28
4 replies
NiP had those stats beforehand, and could've provided them after 2 rounds
2021-05-17 10:51
3 replies
So why trashpoint didnt postponed the match then and now they even want a replay?
2021-05-17 10:54
2 replies
Because flashpoint are dogshit
2021-05-17 10:57
1 reply
Agreed Btw *trashpoint
2021-05-17 11:06
#108
 | 
Europe Hetixes
Anonymo published that they even offered NiP to change the servers and stuff but NiP refused so
2021-05-17 10:29
1 reply
#131
 | 
Belgium Woke!
It’s literally confirmed that isn’t true.
2021-05-17 15:30
Exactly. But no one would blame England for pushing the referee into giving a rematch after that incident. People would blame the referee if he decided that he would do a rematch after he saw how he fucked up by allowing that goal. It's fucked up that people are blaming NiP for wanting a rematch in this scenario, when they got fucked over by flashpoint, and in your analogy, the referee.
2021-05-17 01:35
1 reply
I feel like NiP's efforts are understandable, but when even the players don't want to force the rematch, the org is just making a big mess. Flashpoint stuck a big shit on the pavement, and the NiP bosses walked right through it
2021-05-17 01:37
"noone would have blamed them" who cares who blames them, they just want their RMR points, and the match would effectively have been forfeited had they refused to play, this way they atleast got a chance to win
2021-05-17 01:35
7 replies
No, they would have far more of a basis to request a rematch before the match is played than now, once the match has been completed
2021-05-17 01:38
6 replies
Read the statements, chat logs, and RMR rules, I've unsuccessfully attempted to explain this to way too many polish people tonight to do it again.
2021-05-17 01:42
5 replies
no, they should request the reschedule before the end of the match, because all they're doing is freerolling. This is completely unfair
2021-05-17 08:49
4 replies
The only thing unfair here is flashpoint placing them in an impossible situation when the issues are confirmed to be outside of NIP control and solely the fault of Flashpoint/Faceit. Anonymo was ok to reschedule, how does this make a difference? They just got one of the best scrims they ever had considering they probably don’t get to practice vs team of that level normally.
2021-05-17 08:57
It may be freerolling, but had they taken the other route it could have ended up in them not getting any RMR points. So they did the only thing they could, and played the match
2021-05-17 12:32
2 replies
no, because if the rulebook is flexible enough to give them a rematch, it definitely gives reschedules. Players hold so much power
2021-05-17 12:33
1 reply
I refer to #6 in the NiP statement. None other than players are allowed in the room during the match
2021-05-17 12:34
When there's a blackout in the middle of soccer match. They wait for one hour for the electricity to come back, if it doesn't they postpone the match and it be replayed with the same score and remaining time. Flashpoint that is at blame here and you really can't say that is unfair to Anonymo if they won unfairly. If it was Astralis vs. Navi little people would be against a rematch, also if it was NiP that won they would n't complain either.
2021-05-17 12:49
scumbag team trying to do damage control. Fifflaren already exposed them for all the garbage they have done since the existance of the org for csgo. Same shit
2021-05-17 01:33
8 replies
Fifflaren didn't even play when the present CEO entered NiP.
2021-05-17 01:36
7 replies
2021-05-17 01:50
lmfao current CEO was there since 2014 but nt. just cuz they love to lie and you got the memory of goldfish. doesn't mean its true
2021-05-17 09:02
#39
 | 
United States Shr3y
Ok you don't even know about your country org and you're defending them
2021-05-17 09:19
4 replies
2021-05-17 09:29
3 replies
#49
 | 
United States Shr3y
2021-05-17 09:34
2 replies
Read facts instead of reffering to a hltv degen
2021-05-17 09:56
1 reply
#82
 | 
United States Shr3y
My bad So this CEO had no history of controversy?
2021-05-17 10:00
I agree, although I do not think the match should be replayed. NIP should fight through the lower bracket, and instead of fighting with this rematch, put the spotlight on Trashpoint and how terrible they are as a TO, hopefully leading to Trashpoint being boycotted by everyone and left for dead.
2021-05-17 01:34
yes flashpoint made me wait an hour+ after they said the game gonna start at 9 am lmao joke of a production team, and they showed jw and golden in their feelings like what lol
2021-05-17 01:34
Flashpoint so trash lmao Just give NiP 400 RMR points as compensation and move on
2021-05-17 01:40
1 reply
+1, this is actually a pretty good idea but idk if they can or if its valve who gives them
2021-05-17 09:50
Yes, Flashpoint fvcked up. I still think that "tier 1 team" shoul've atleast 2 internet connections. If They had 2 connections, They would realize in 1 minute that there is something wrong with Flashpoint and They block nip's connection. Yes, Anonymo did nothing wrong and They get punished.
2021-05-17 01:54
Doesn't really matter who fcked up Games can't be replayed, that's a fckin eternal rule It will create really dangerous precedent... Why won't we replay every game where coach bug was abused? Why won't we replay every game where players were ddosed and couldn't play?
2021-05-17 09:01
6 replies
#43
 | 
Poland Amirek
Also bracket wasn't replayed in open qualifiers where a team got DQ for cheating in the same tournament
2021-05-17 09:27
5 replies
well open qualis are a bit different than the main event but im torn between both sides, both are right and both are being punished
2021-05-17 09:51
4 replies
#77
 | 
Poland Amirek
Yeah it is a bit different, though they potentialy robbed a team from qualifying to Flashpoint 3
2021-05-17 09:56
3 replies
yeah true tho maybe if it was actually a good team then it would of been different but most likely a randon team
2021-05-17 09:59
2 replies
#87
 | 
Poland Amirek
oh so random team is less important than a big team, nice esports integrity
2021-05-17 10:06
1 reply
not what i meant, i just meant like if it was a "bigger" team they would have complained about it more but it still would have not been replayed
2021-05-17 10:07
They are not the bad guy here coz Flashpoint is but they did also bad things like pushing Flashpoint to do rematch or they just lied at their statement.That's just unrespectful.Take a L and leave Anonymo alone.Unlucky we have many braindead swedes who think hurting other team by helping other team is a solution.No it's not.
2021-05-17 09:16
Anybody with normal IQ understands this, it's just trolls and morons that keep whining about it. It was unfair, match needs to be replayed. Should be pretty easy to understand.
2021-05-17 09:13
27 replies
#40
 | 
United States Shr3y
NIP should have forfeited right then n there. Everyone would have supported them, if trash point disqualified them. But now they want to take away hard earned victory from anonymo and that's the shittiest thing to do, but NIP have the past of being one of the most trash org so I guess it's ok
2021-05-17 09:21
26 replies
NIP were doing what they could, admins were pressuring the players to get ready or get DQ, players may not have the full rulebook in their heads and the people that do aren't allowed in the same room. What you say may have been a better solution if that would allow for an appeal - maybe it won't? - I sure don't know all the rules. But then again, the decisions where forced on the players and they did what they thought was best in the situation. The facts still stands that there were problems caused by the flashpoint and they didn't give NIP the chance to postpone.
2021-05-17 09:29
25 replies
#48
 | 
United States Shr3y
1. The fundamental argument by my side is NIP should have forfeited rather than play half assed. As I said if problems were from trash point side the support would have been for nip from community. 2. You see they are literally crying so strongly 2 days after the match, when the outcome came. this is very very unprofessional stuff, see all the pro players accepting it was shitty thing to do by NIP
2021-05-17 09:33
23 replies
1. It was up to the players. I can imagine that they don't know the rules 100% and wouldn't know what refusing to play would result in. If the whole NIP org would have been in on the decision and that refusing to play would have meant they could in fact play again, then yes, that would have been a better way to do it. But as that wasn't how it was it doesn't matter. 2. Yes, complaining about problems caused by match organizer is very unprofessional. Professionals as you say should use social media to join a lynch mob against fellow players.
2021-05-17 09:48
3 replies
#68
 | 
United States Shr3y
Very bad take from you but unfortunately you are biased! I sincerely hope anonymo wins again, not gonna happen but NiP is a trash org and more n more people will see it now! So happy they signed the perfect crybaby
2021-05-17 09:50
2 replies
How is anything I've said biased? I have only been stating facts and the "theory" that the players might not know all the rules perfectly. You say that they should have refused to play, and as you say that I assume that you must know what the rules say about that, so please explain. What do the rules say if one team refuses to play?
2021-05-17 09:55
1 reply
#79
 | 
United States Shr3y
It's not so hard to predict what "rules" would have stated if the problem is beyond your control. It doesn't take much common sense to realize that you can't play with loss in a competitive match.
2021-05-17 09:58
#66
 | 
Finland okxD
Everyone thought that the problem was at NIP's side during the match so playing the game was the right call at the time considering that they could even get disqualified for forfeiting the match. Why should NIP just accept losing a important match quietly, when the technical problem was out of their control and not their fault?
2021-05-17 09:51
18 replies
#72
 | 
United States Shr3y
1. Everyonevs "thought" doesn't matter, we don't know what's happening between players n TO, but they know that. They should have made up their mind right then n there. 2. accepting loss because what's done is done. Trash point fucked up but you can't give hard time to anonymo to this who won fair m square. Imagine replaying a major final just because dev1ce had ping issues n he didn't persuaded enough to forfeit it then.
2021-05-17 09:52
17 replies
#83
 | 
Finland okxD
1. "Everyone" including NIP, FP and Anonymo. They only got to know that it wasnt NIP's fault in saturday so it is just braindead you to think that they should have forfeited, which could have led to disqualification. 2. "who won fair and square" hahahahah The thing is that they didnt. Did you already forget that NIP played with 30% loss or what? Also very bad comparision because ping issues are usually the player's internet's fault and the loss% in this case wasnt.
2021-05-17 10:01
16 replies
#85
 | 
United States Shr3y
You do realise you can't play csgo with constant 10 percent loss too right? That "fact" by devve has been debunked, that he himself changed his statement to "oh no it was just some random spikes"
2021-05-17 10:04
15 replies
#89
 | 
Finland okxD
Hahahaha Now you are accusing them of lying when he never said that it was constant loss%. Also loss% spikes still made the game unfair for NIP
2021-05-17 10:08
14 replies
#91
 | 
United States Shr3y
Devve's first tweet "we have to play with 30-40% loss" Who's lying now?
2021-05-17 10:10
5 replies
#93
 | 
Finland okxD
Yes, where does he say that it is CONSTANT loss% like you claimed?
2021-05-17 10:11
4 replies
#97
 | 
United States Shr3y
When you specify a range (30-40%), the general consensus of statistic is to take it as a average metric.
2021-05-17 10:14
3 replies
#99
 | 
Finland okxD
My bad, thats true. I guess it was poor choice of words from Device rather than lying. And it really doesnt change the fact that with spikes its still very unfair.
2021-05-17 10:17
2 replies
#101
 | 
United States Shr3y
Yeah spikes are annoying af, bro I'm just sad anonymo got screwed over by trash point when they agreed for rematch 2 rounds into bo3. Sigh. Good day to you.
2021-05-17 10:19
1 reply
#110
 | 
Finland okxD
Which one got screwed over harder, NIP, who lost a game because of a server problem Or Anonymo who won an unfair match and has to replay it again under fair circumstances?
2021-05-17 10:30
#92
 | 
United States Shr3y
But why punish anonymo for trahspoint's shitty decision.
2021-05-17 10:10
7 replies
#95
 | 
Finland okxD
But why punish NIP for Faceit's shitty servers? And its not like they are giving the win for NIP, they are replaying the game But people act like they are giving the win to NIP because everyone knows that Anonymo didnt deserve the win and wont be able to win NIP in fair conditions.
2021-05-17 10:13
6 replies
#98
 | 
United States Shr3y
People are shitting on nip because they never asked for rematch "during" the game. Read their official statement on Twitter, they started crying 2 days after the match, which is a real shitty thing to do.
2021-05-17 10:16
5 replies
#103
 | 
Finland okxD
But Anonymo did suggest rescheduling during the match but Flashpoint did not allow that. So they couldnt rematch it during the game because they thought that it was NIP's fault. And whats so shitty about it? Its NIP's right to ask for a replay now that they know it wasnt their's fault. Dont forget that NIP was also the "victim" here.
2021-05-17 10:23
4 replies
#104
 | 
United States Shr3y
NIP didn't ask for a rematch, anonymo did, do you not see the problem here?
2021-05-17 10:23
3 replies
#107
 | 
Finland okxD
Lmao you are just lost case. Why does it matter that they didnt ask for a rematch, it would have been rejected anyway instantly?
2021-05-17 10:28
2 replies
#109
 | 
United States Shr3y
So you won't ask for the right thing because it will be rejected, yeah protests are pointless then I guess
2021-05-17 10:30
1 reply
#112
 | 
Finland okxD
For the 100th time, they did not ask for the rematch during the game, because they thought that it was their probmem.
2021-05-17 10:32
#119
 | 
Denmark Humber98
You have sc for admins threating DQ?
2021-05-17 10:57
i think its safe to say that no one is going to give a shit about flashpoint events anymore, that is if they gave a shit to begin with
2021-05-17 09:22
1 reply
+1 there are like 4/8 of the founding teams that still have a roster
2021-05-17 09:48
#46
 | 
Netherlands EFR89
Demanding a replay while you played out the full match is stupid. If they wanted any public opinion in their favour they should have not have played out the full match to see if they could have won it. It's like getting a second chance for free. That's unfair to Anonymo.
2021-05-17 09:32
1 reply
well from what i understand it was unfair for nip because both teams wanted a reschedule but flashpoint admins said no reschedule. so nip basicly had the options of forefit or play and who wants to forefit such a important match? After the match they asked for a investigation into why they had packetloss while at the same time asking for a replay if the investigation found that it wasnt nips fault and it happened and now we are here
2021-05-17 09:43
#51
 | 
Poland dawido0305
wtf is that hr and date
2021-05-17 09:46
4 replies
what?
2021-05-17 09:44
3 replies
#57
 | 
Poland dawido0305
12:19 PM · May 17, 2021 under the post
2021-05-17 09:46
2 replies
for me it says 2021-05-17 02:29
2021-05-17 09:47
1 reply
#61
 | 
Poland dawido0305
lmao thx twitter
2021-05-17 09:47
Hmmmm idk who to side with, but in the end its a massive fuckup from faceit admins
2021-05-17 09:46
1 reply
#59
 | 
Poland dawido0305
dunno strange
2021-05-17 09:46
ikr theres just to many braindead polaks and the their hypocrisy of blaming others when it always have been flashpoint fault. Add a bit of people who think they know it all with a large following boom! more idiots
2021-05-17 10:12
#96
 | 
Panama Bill_Bait
Clown in Pyjamas
2021-05-17 10:14
Match should be not replayed ofc. I fully agree with EliGE, while NiP players experience packet loss, the match should not even start. Its 2021, not 2010 guys, those problems can't decide about the score. Flashpoint/Organisation fault to force match to happen, NiP fault to agree with playing on this day. They should just go full confident and say they will start play when problems will be solved, or they just go W/O. Anonymo did nothing bad, they win the match, they wanted to help and they might be most disadvantaged in it all
2021-05-17 10:22
Flashpoint wronged NIP Now they wrong Anonymo 2 wrongs dont make one right
2021-05-17 10:34
flashpoint is at fault but its so unprofessional when players that were not in the match are tweeting 'trashpoint', and who is at fault etc. just to make themselves look good, like fucking stay out of it. this shit should only be discussed between TOs and the players involved.
2021-05-17 10:40
#116
 | 
Brunei Venicious
Too many people blaming nip here, ive read all statements and only anonymo says nip were offered a rematch at 1-1 in the first map, flashpoint doesnt say so however. If its true that nip declined a rematch at that point i understand anonymos point of view, but it seems like they are just lying. Flashpoint states they forced to continue the match so nip didnt have a choice at all, and the packet loss wasnt their fault either. With a major spot on the line, people are still blaming nip lol... for what exactly? Not accepting a loss because of bad connections which wasnt their fault?
2021-05-17 10:52
#117
 | 
Brunei cyLoL
Trashpoint below iBP in make decision
2021-05-17 10:54
nope innocent is in anonymo
2021-05-17 10:58
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.