Thread has been deleted
Last comment
Anonymo TWEET UNFAIR?
f0rest | 
Sweden Kahbor4L 
Yes flag checks out but was Anonymo's statement unfair and misleading? I'm talking about this one : twitter.com/AnonymoEsports/status/139398.. When I Read that, I legit got the impression that NiP was behind the scenes completely pressuring and forcing flashpoint/anonymo into doing a rematch. With more context, it seems like all NiP really did was send a formal request to flashpoint to do a rematch, with their arguments and proof as to why it should happen. Flashpoint then accepted it, after they noticed it was faceit server issues that caused the lag and that was that? The tweets from Anonymo & Players that NiP were "messaging Them forcing Them to pick between replaying bo3 or last map" was legit just a result from flashpoint deciding that they will do a rematch. Thoughts?
2021-05-17 06:58
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
Flag checks out
2021-05-17 06:58
6 replies
ok:) but at least hear me out... even tho my flag checks out
2021-05-17 07:00
3 replies
NiP doesnt want to accept the loss. And thats it. Pathetic. If they had no role on this situation they would have been cancelled the rematch.
2021-05-17 07:01
2 replies
It's Kinda Hard to accept a loss if you were forced to play with heavy package loss , that was caused by faceits servers
2021-05-17 07:04
1 reply
#32
 | 
Poland craZek
did you saw they're perspective? Do you know what 40% packet loss look like? They won 1st map 16:3 and they were'nt crying, in the last map everything was ok until they started losing. If faceit or flashpoint refused to move the match to the next day when anonymo proposed, they should refuse to to a retmatch either
2021-05-17 08:06
+1
2021-05-17 07:18
#36
 | 
Serbia LtN))
+1
2021-05-17 11:15
#3
 | 
Pakistan LoOuU2
Device exaggerated in his initial tweets , Anonymo doing it now . It even outs. the only takeaway here , is Flashpoint trying to save their ass now by offering rematch while screwing it before by not giving it when score was 1-1 on first map. Flashpoint needs to apologize.
2021-05-17 07:01
7 replies
Yes but device never exaggerated or attacked the other team (Anonymo). He was only mad at faceit and criticizing them. Yes he said "we will have to play on 40% loss" instead of "we will have to play with package loss that sometimes spikes up to 40% but that's not a big deal imo
2021-05-17 07:03
6 replies
he made like 10 tweets crying, thats a bit 2 much imho
2021-05-17 07:05
3 replies
ye but tbh it was really poorly handled by the admins so i can understand that he was really upset
2021-05-17 07:06
10 crying tweets for face it being shite is not equal to accusing nip of pressuring face it to skew results in their favour if you had a bit of common sense you would realize how big of a deal the latter is
2021-05-17 07:34
1 reply
+1
2021-05-17 14:00
#10
 | 
Pakistan LoOuU2
i dont blame Anonymo for anything here. Device was furious since the first map on packet loss as the chat SS show and he poured it all out on Twiiter , imagine how furious Anonymo would be after getting forced for a rematch by Faceit even though they waited an hour for Nip to sort their issues and offered to reschedule. Poor Polish guys are getting screwed over by Trashpoint. Their anger is justified , they shouldnt be forced to a rematch.
2021-05-17 07:06
1 reply
okay fair enough
2021-05-17 07:07
Anonymo using victim card to full advantage and getting away with their assumptions.
2021-05-17 07:06
Nip should have never played that match under those conditions and later do a formal request to Flashpoint. Playing that match means they were aware of the possibilities. Im sure they would not be complaining about the issues if they would won the match. They played the game so they have to take responsibility of the defeat. Shame on you Nip.
2021-05-17 07:07
2 replies
Well NiP wanted to reschedule the match and was complaining about the lags 2 rounds into the first game. But flashpoint forced Them to play, basically saying that they either play as it is or it's a forfeit. Easy in hindsight to say that NiP should've taken the forfeit. The players couldn't even talk to their management cus of RMR rules, i bet it was confusing af for them what to do
2021-05-17 07:10
#14
 | 
United States GVoidV2
NIP stated that FP didn't allow them to reschedule It was to either play or ff
2021-05-17 07:11
#15
 | 
Brazil loldougie
Yes this is exactly what happened, Anonymo literally tweeted saying that they thought/assumed that NIP pressured Flashpoint. Pure wild speculation intended to rile up the idiot fans into freaking out on social media.
2021-05-17 07:12
6 replies
+1 everyone wants to be the good guy standing up for anonymo but nip didn't do anything wrong
2021-05-17 07:22
Nip request a rematch so they are right
2021-05-17 07:23
3 replies
#25
 | 
Brazil loldougie
They deserve a rematch, they weren't given any other options besides to play with insane packet loss. It isn't fair for Anonymo either though, because they did win. So it could really go either way, but the point is that you can't blame either organization for any of it, it's purely FaceIT's fault. Edit: The way Anonymo handled it on social media was fucking embarrassing though. Imagine making an accusation like that towards a respectable organization with absolutely no proof.
2021-05-17 07:26
2 replies
It's pathetic that they threw wild accusations and speculations in an official statement only to rile people up and play the victim card And people still think anynomo are saints
2021-05-17 07:30
#29
 | 
Russia yungyoda
+1
2021-05-17 07:34
#27
 | 
Russia yungyoda
Yes sir
2021-05-17 07:34
Jonas Gundersen in his deleted reply said : Our players didn't push for a rematch here - we did. (NiP staff)
2021-05-17 07:16
3 replies
Push in his context can be referring to their request to rematch. And requests for rematches are fully allowed in the rulebook.
2021-05-17 07:18
2 replies
but why did he delete the reply then?
2021-05-17 07:19
1 reply
Well he and the CEO deleted like most of their tweets about this. I am guessing PR advice.
2021-05-17 07:20
flag checks out and get over it. even device accepted that he acted like a dick and is ready to play lower brackets stop making threads over n over again
2021-05-17 07:21
5 replies
Get over it? There is so much hate between both sides on hltv lol and people are coming with the worst arguments, shouldn’t get over it yet
2021-05-17 07:40
4 replies
No mens(( I'm not taking anyone's side. It's kinda clear that NiP were acting like sore losers. And there's nothing more to discuss now. Even your IGL supports what I'm saying.
2021-05-17 10:29
3 replies
2 replies
Just highlight to what premise I assumed instead of supporting it. Let's have a real discussion
2021-05-17 11:16
1 reply
No thanks
2021-05-17 11:22
Heres my take on all three sides: Lets start with NiP: They shouldnt have accepted to play the match at all because its clearly unfair for them and should force TO's to reschedule it another day, yes i know that flashpoint forced to continue the match if only they forced them aswell it couldve ended better. Anonymo's: Theyre clearly a victim here but im not saying they didnt do anything wrong, imo those tweets from them is just adding more fuel to the drama, and im very sure its not true that theyre just trying to get as much as they can as a victim. Im saying this to the management not to the players because iirc, NiP players were saying that Anonymo players showed true sportsmanship and were ready to accept any solution. Flashpoint no, TRASHPOINT KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK : Its so obvious here that they handled the situation very poorly by not postponing the match where clearly NO solution was found, and iirc BOTH NiP and Anonymo players think its better to postpone it either way. Imo aslong as either side is playing at a disanvantage thats out of their control then the match is unfair and should, and imo MUST be postponed to ensure its fair for both sides. And now theyre trying to clean up theyre asses by doing this bullshittery which make the situation EVEN MORE WORSE KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK disband TrAsHpOiNt :D Ehem, imo there should be no rematch because its unfair for the Anonymo's side and NiP players were find with it either. Remember its the NiP management who asked for a rematch not the players because they agree to grind either way.
2021-05-17 08:01
#35
 | 
Brunei cyLoL
Who car trashpoint make gaming paradise 2
2021-05-17 11:13
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.