Thread has been deleted
Last comment
How NIP should've acted
HUNDEN | 
Lithuania gime114 
NIP refuse to play, if FF by Flashpoint they raise hell and demand a replay. They said themselves that they knew the issue was on Flashpoint's end during the technical, so not an excuse to say they were threatened with an FF. By playing and demanding a rematch they literally hope for best of both worlds. They don't get forced to FF, if they win gg ez, if they lose they get to play again with fair conditions. IMO a replay should not be on the table, because it's just fuelling the fire and literally solves nothing.
2021-05-17 10:32
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
hunden flair talking about how to play fair
2021-05-17 10:35
4 replies
fan of cheater talking about playing fair
2021-05-17 10:36
#15
 | 
Asia loveall
You shouldn't say this when there is the largest talent of the scene, forsaken.
2021-05-17 10:47
1 reply
+1 cs god
2021-05-17 10:47
they should have coach bug tournaments, where every coach gets to pick position and then inform teams of plays
2021-05-17 11:08
Nips options were: forfeit/disqualify or play the match
2021-05-17 10:36
11 replies
#6
 | 
Poland ethereal0
can you read
2021-05-17 10:37
#8
i am | 
Finland iBait
And yet they chose the option where they play the match and demand to play it again because they lost
2021-05-17 10:38
9 replies
are you stupid
2021-05-17 10:43
8 replies
#11
i am | 
Finland iBait
Are you being held hostage by NiP?
2021-05-17 10:41
7 replies
>forfeit due to something out of your control because FP wont accept your solution of using a 3rd party server >play out the match and try your luck Pick one
2021-05-17 10:42
5 replies
#14
i am | 
Finland iBait
They chose to try their luck and when it didn't pan out they leveraged their fanbase to harass Anonymo in to replaying a match they won fair and square, sure
2021-05-17 10:47
4 replies
#17
 | 
Finland okxD
They couldnt forfeit because they thought that it was their problem... Just read this twitter.com/NIP/status/13940549248964403..
2021-05-17 10:49
#19
REZ | 
Australia FlaKeXD
if they forfeited then people would say: "lol they forfeited, can't ask for rematch now", and what you mean Anonymo won fair and square??? They had a clear advantage, sure out of their control and not their fault, but fair and square, you really haven't been paying attention have u.
2021-05-17 10:50
are u high?
2021-05-17 10:51
i first thought u were actually retarded then i read your name and see now that u likely only pretend to be retarded
2021-05-17 10:59
yes he is held at gunpoint RN someone send help
2021-05-17 11:00
#3
i am | 
Finland iBait
NiP should disband out of respect for Anonymo
2021-05-17 10:36
#5
 | 
Brunei Venicious
Flashpoint forced them to continue playing, but you make a good point. Still i think its more than fair for them to request a rematch as the connections were shitty and it wasnt their fault.
2021-05-17 10:37
4 replies
#22
 | 
Finland okxD
No he didnt make a good point
2021-05-17 10:55
3 replies
#25
 | 
Brunei Venicious
I dont know about that. But i changed my mind on what i just wrote, nip were forced to play the match regardless of their problems so i cant blame them at all. Its not like they just played out the game to wait and see if they won and only request a replay if they lost. They were forced to play the match and anonymos management was even trying to get them DQ in the meantime lol.
2021-05-17 10:57
2 replies
#27
 | 
Denmark Humber98
Screenshots of trying to get them DQ?
2021-05-17 11:00
1 reply
#30
 | 
Brunei Venicious
twitter.com/NIP/status/13940549248964403.. I mean i am taking their word for it but i dont think they would casually lie about it.
2021-05-17 11:01
This is happens when someone is broke the script.
2021-05-17 10:38
#13
 | 
Finland okxD
"They said themselves that they knew the issue was on Flashpoint's end during the technical" Source on this please. Afaik, this is just more bullshit lies. twitter.com/NIP/status/13940549248964403..
2021-05-17 10:46
9 replies
twitter.com/NIP/status/13940549248964403.. 2. "NIP's ISP insists that the issue is on the game server side" 5. "NIP suggested playing on a third party server" + there's logs of NIP players saying in game chat that only Faceit servers have issues for them.
2021-05-17 10:52
8 replies
2021-05-17 10:56
#31
 | 
Finland okxD
Ye i noticed bit late, anyway i still think that NIP has the right for the rematch
2021-05-17 11:07
6 replies
#34
 | 
Brunei Venicious
Yes completely, yet people keep blaming nip for no reason
2021-05-17 11:08
1 reply
2021-05-17 11:22
I get where you're both coming from, but let's be honest, Flashpoint says NIP didn't ask for reschedule and NIP themselves say that Anonymo were the ones to suggest a reschedule. What management does shouldn't be in the picture, because what NIP management is doing now is also wrong. Fact is, NIP themselves did not want to postpone. It's all on Flashpoint that we're even in this situation, but I think NIP and Anonymo (if DQ allegations are true) both fucked up as well.
2021-05-17 11:15
3 replies
Anonymo said nip wasnt against postponing
2021-05-17 11:42
2 replies
still it wasn't anonymo's responsibility to ask for a postpone
2021-05-17 11:44
1 reply
Meaning nip asked for one but flash point said no
2021-05-17 12:34
#18
 | 
Poland aiken
You are on point dude. Why would they even start 3rd map if they felt like they lost 2nd map because of packet loss. Everyone would normally request to postpone 3rd map.
2021-05-17 10:50
14 replies
#32
 | 
Brunei Venicious
Because flashpoint forced them to, do any of the people on here even read all the statements?
2021-05-17 11:08
13 replies
#36 How they forced them? With a gun? Rockets? Pretty sure they wouldn't dq them if both teams leave due to lags - every pro team would support them and boycott even more
2021-05-17 11:20
12 replies
#40
 | 
Brunei Venicious
I think in the end thats true, but if you read the statements flashpoint forced the match to go on and thats all im saying. We never know what wouldve happened if they boycotted it.
2021-05-17 11:23
11 replies
Yes and in my opinion they should pay for it, not Anonymo Faceit should pay big money compensation and public 'sorry' (because NiP had issues they cant resolve - faceit routing/configuration problems) Rematch is a clown fiesta and dangerous precedent - games should not be replayed when already over, they should only be stopped during the game..
2021-05-17 11:38
10 replies
#42
 | 
Brunei Venicious
I agree they should def make a statement and sorry towards anonymo, maybe a compensation even. If nip wouldve known that in the end flashpoint would decide to replay the match anyway they wouldnt have played this in the first place im sure, but if the flashpoints admins tell them they had to play the match.. i cant blame them.
2021-05-17 11:40
8 replies
I mean sorry and compensation to NiP but no rematch Also faceit said in their official statement: "Nip's intermittent lag issues were reportedly resolved during the third map" So it seems like Anonymo won 3rd map fairly or NiP/Faceit are lying (someone of them)
2021-05-17 11:41
7 replies
#45
 | 
Brunei Venicious
If its true the lag was resolved in the third map then i agree with you
2021-05-17 11:43
1 reply
Idk if it's true, Faceit said that, they may be lying Idk wtf is going on here anymore
2021-05-17 11:46
#47
 | 
Brunei Venicious
imgur.com/a/CCrzbzE But this proves otherwise
2021-05-17 11:44
4 replies
It is first map
2021-05-17 11:46
3 replies
#50
 | 
Brunei Venicious
No its all 3, you can load more images
2021-05-17 11:47
2 replies
yeah I didn't notice so it's probably faceit talking bullshit to avoid punishment
2021-05-17 11:48
1 reply
#52
 | 
Brunei Venicious
Seems like it haha, so much drama lol
2021-05-17 11:49
"Rematch is a clown fiesta and dangerous precedent - games should not be replayed when already over, they should only be stopped during the game.." I so much agree +99
2021-05-17 12:42
Agree.
2021-05-17 10:55
ThANK you finally someone who understands
2021-05-17 11:01
+1 They could just boycott faceit together with Anonymo and leave the server I'm sure every pro player and big org would support them and faceit would be forced to postpone IMO they thought Anonymo is a very weak opponent so they can just beat them even with lags and after overpass they were pretty sure about it ;) So they didn't want to cancel anymore
2021-05-17 11:18
Yeah if they are able to prove that the problem wasnt created by them, they could have not played and filed the same complaint, everyone would be happy
2021-05-17 11:23
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.