Thread has been deleted
Last comment
NIP flashpoint
Netherlands human_being 
I'm not a fan of either team so here is my objective take. - The org screwed up by starting the game on a bad server - The org screwed up by forcing a replay in a belated attempt to "fix" their mistake, which you can't do, especially not in cs when all strats have been exposed Both of the team didn't do much wrong, NIP is right to be angry to get their chance at a game stolen, those other guys are right to be angry to get their game stolen.
2021-05-17 10:54
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
#1
 | 
Serbia YODAKOLE1
Maybe give Anonymo 1-0 on start.I mean nip just go play lower.Cry is free dev1ce
2021-05-17 10:56
22 replies
i feel like you missed the point, there is no "fair" way to solve this. Either way somebody is getting screwed.
2021-05-17 10:59
21 replies
#7
 | 
Italy alex12345
That's why you don't replay the match. It's NiP's fault for not refusing to play in these conditions. They didn't even accept a rematch when they had the opportunity. Now that they lost they try to get a rematch. Actual clowns
2021-05-17 11:02
8 replies
#11
 | 
Serbia YODAKOLE1
+1
2021-05-17 11:03
#18
 | 
Denmark Humber98
There was no rematch to accept. Anonymo players threw in the room but flashpoint said they have to play now! Flashpoint admins were threating NiP to get DQ because of the delays. Imagine you are 5 players, 3 out of them very very young. You have to play there becaude they thought its their fault with the networking when in reality it was FP. So stop throwing out nonsense when you clearly didn't inform yourself about the situation.
2021-05-17 11:11
4 replies
#19
 | 
Italy alex12345
Do you really think it's Flashpoint's fault for the packet loss? "Security settings partially blocking traffic from NiP to game server" I wouldn't be so sure... This could easily be an excuse made up by Flashpoint after being payed from NiP They should give evidence of these "Security settings"
2021-05-17 11:18
2 replies
#30
 | 
Denmark Humber98
Bro if that is the official statement. NiP isn't the mafia. Do you live in a movie?
2021-05-17 11:56
1 reply
#32
 | 
Italy alex12345
No, just rightfully dubious because of lack of evidence
2021-05-17 12:06
They never filed an official request to reschedule the game. Moreover, it's not the players that have to ask, it's the org. This is not a small LAN in 2002 anymore.
2021-05-17 11:57
#20
 | 
Sweden Cruxor
1: They had no option to refuse to play. They either had to play with the lags or they would automatically forfeit the game. 2: Both NIP and Anonymo offered to postpone the game but Flashpoint refused. 3: NIP management delivered a formal complaint to flashpoint the day afterward, which is allowed by the official rules. Flashpoint concluded that the lags were indeed their fault and not NIPs fault. Therefore Flashpoint decided the match should be replayed since they were to blame and not NIP. The only clown here is Flashpoint.
2021-05-17 11:19
1 reply
+1
2021-05-17 11:22
#10
 | 
Serbia YODAKOLE1
You are not right there is right way to solve this.NIP just go play lower
2021-05-17 11:06
Nip got screwed. now it's time to anonymo. that seems fair now. screws: NiP 1 Anonymo 1. Let's play!
2021-05-17 11:05
10 replies
this reminds me of that PT NL football game :p
2021-05-17 11:06
1 reply
it was a funny game: 50% discount in red cards that day :D
2021-05-17 11:07
#16
 | 
Italy alex12345
it doesn't work like that... read #7
2021-05-17 11:07
#17
 | 
Serbia YODAKOLE1
IDK i think just give anonymo one or myb to everyone.IDK TRASHPOINT
2021-05-17 11:07
Ok so they fix NIPs issue by screwing over Anonymo? That makes it Anonymo 1 NIP 0
2021-05-17 11:30
5 replies
no, they fix a tournament issue. the issuewas not on NiP, as the event org admitted
2021-05-17 12:55
4 replies
Neither was it anonymo's? all they did is remove NIPs issue and give it to Anonymo.
2021-05-17 13:03
3 replies
wtf?? did you hit your head against the wall? Anonymo took advantage of a tournament issue. it's not their fault, but they took the advantage. sorry, that doesn't seem a fair game
2021-05-17 13:06
2 replies
xddddd let me explain it to you they play bo3 and decide to keep playing even though they have lagg(anonomy showed that they are willing to reschedule). NIP does keep playing knowing they are going to cry anyways when they lose. So conclusion: DONT PLAY IF YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO ACCEPT THE OUTCOME
2021-05-17 13:09
1 reply
xddddd let me explain to you they play bo3 because they weren't 100% sure about the source of the issues. They handle it correctly: ok, we are having problems but there's a chance it's our fault. at they, they investigated and it happens to be FP's fault.
2021-05-17 13:11
T R A S H P O I N T
2021-05-17 10:59
Correct, but: -NiP is fake for saying: we are prepared to and will play the lower bracket, all we want is acknowledgement that we played in unfavorable conditions because it was extremely embarrassing for us to lose our debut match to Anonymo. -conditions acknowledged by Flashpoint, NiP still files formal request for rematch, Flashpoint bends the knee. -Tweet by NiPCSGO saying they had fixed the issues with their ISP before Map 3. Dev1ce replying to that tweet with an "All 3 maps" response is both confusing, contradictory to what his org said, and hilarious as an excuse for their loss. Flashpoint screwed up royally. NiP attempting to save face after expecting the community to support the rematch over supporting Anonymo.
2021-05-17 11:00
1 reply
+1
2021-05-17 11:02
#5
 | 
Ukraine McSwell
NiP should either stop playing right after lags appeared and demand a game reschedule, or don't cry afterwards when all 3 maps were finished.
2021-05-17 11:01
7 replies
#9
 | 
Italy alex12345
exactly
2021-05-17 11:03
i agree but it wasn't clear at the time they would not get dq for that, so I understand their decision too
2021-05-17 11:04
2 replies
if they really had 40% loss at times there was no chance on earth they win so might aswell surrender and anonymo would have no reason not to rematch at that point
2021-05-17 11:31
1 reply
It's not just up to anonymo, the org has to approve, and they didn't seem open to the idea at the time
2021-05-17 11:34
If they were stop playing, automatic forfeit and cya. Forfeit an RMR game (which is not even their fault) or try to play with disadvantage, but still a chance. Choose wisely.
2021-05-17 11:26
they literally did? in fact anonymo told flashpoint that nip should be disqualified if they do not play
2021-05-17 12:08
they didnt have 100% sure about the origin of issues, so they had to play. at the end, if it was NIP fault, ok. but it wasn't
2021-05-17 13:08
I honestly don't care, but I think it's funny that Anonymo can't play on swedish servers.
2021-05-17 11:01
#21
 | 
Brunei cyLoL
NiP are give flashpoint money for rematch win
2021-05-17 11:21
2 replies
#28
 | 
Italy alex12345
I think so too
2021-05-17 11:36
1 reply
#29
 | 
Brunei cyLoL
Yes mens)) it true they are match fix Source - trust me mens))
2021-05-17 11:39
NiP owns Flashpoint just like s1mple owns FPL, deciding which players are getting kicked AXAXAXAXAXAXAXAXAXA
2021-05-17 11:32
2021-05-17 13:11
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.