Thread has been deleted
Last comment
GG to both teams, unfair cuz nip had 2 chances to win but who am i to judge, gl to anonymo in their next matches, hope nip won't have internet issues in the future so no other team will experience same bullshit as anonymo did congrats to snax, that ace was nice, show them that good old janusz is still here
2021-05-18 22:22
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
nice name
2021-05-18 22:22
2 replies
thx bro
2021-05-18 22:25
1 reply
#36
 | 
Portugal migboss
based name
2021-05-18 22:40
WP to Anonymo, underseved loss
2021-05-18 22:23
2 replies
indeed :/
2021-05-18 22:36
1 reply
it happens. but they performed very nicely in bad spot and probably feeling under the weather.
2021-05-18 23:25
SNAX IS ALWAYS HUNGRY NO ONE IS TO BLAME BUT TRASHPOINT NIP 'FANS' MAKING LAUGH THREADS WINNING 16-14 IN REMATCH ARE LAUGHING WITH THEMSELVES GG
2021-05-18 22:23
1 reply
+1 trashpoint should get the fuck out of cs tournaments 4ever
2021-05-18 22:24
I like your name
2021-05-18 22:23
1 reply
and im fan of yours
2021-05-18 22:25
#6
 | 
Russia yungyoda
I feel like its very happy Day. Justice has won.toxicity lost
2021-05-18 22:25
9 replies
justice? where do you see justice? i know you are baiting as every nip fan rn but it's not funny really, trashpoint did horrible things to the community and you say that justice won
2021-05-18 22:27
8 replies
The horrible thing would have been an unfair victory when the other team could barely play due to lags (the fact confirmed by the TO).
2021-05-19 00:15
7 replies
yeah but it's not fault of anonymo but trashpoint so why anonymo shpuld suffer cuz of their mistake, they won a match trashpoint seen as relevent
2021-05-19 00:29
6 replies
Anonymo won in a game where their opponent was at a significant disadvantage. This victory is not legit.
2021-05-19 00:39
5 replies
man, flashpoint said it was, then changed opinion, you shouldn't take away victory from any team
2021-05-19 00:53
3 replies
"then changed opinion" - you are literally making things up right now.
2021-05-19 00:55
2 replies
maybe i used wrong words, i mean that flashpoint by forcing nip to play made this match(the og one)(bullshit af, trashpoint is stupid) official and that now changing the result is not ok, both anonymo and nip lost in this situation
2021-05-19 09:41
1 reply
I agree. Anonymo lost game, while NiP lost in their reputation - and I think NiP's loss is much more significant, unfortunately.
2021-05-19 23:32
i'd say that matches played on both 14th and 18th were unfair, since in the first one, anonymo had advantage not caused by players, and the second one was basicly second chance for NIP to win after a lost series.
2021-05-19 23:38
terrible handling, trashpoint continued the game and they punish anonymo for it?
2021-05-18 22:25
13 replies
punished? in what way
2021-05-18 22:26
12 replies
that nip had 2 chances to win against them
2021-05-18 22:27
9 replies
#18
 | 
Sweden MANDlNGO
Anonymo also had 2 chances
2021-05-18 22:30
4 replies
but when you win the 1st the 2nd one is in the favour of the loser :) it's so simple to understand
2021-05-18 22:31
2 replies
#32
 | 
Sweden MANDlNGO
NiP had all the pressure, Anonymo had 90% of all fanbase behind them. I would say NiP deserved this bo3 in total. Don't hate the player, hate the game!
2021-05-18 22:36
1 reply
wtf you talking about, anonymo had no pressure? yeah only the pressure they can lose the match and go to lower bracket, you think ano players were pleased and calm while playing? you think they wasn't stressed
2021-05-18 22:44
#58
 | 
France poulpup
the thing is, if nip won the first bo3 the match wouldn't have been rematch so anonymo had to win twice basically either cancel the first match in the first place, or don't rematch only fair way to get this out
2021-05-18 23:29
better team won at the end of the day
2021-05-18 22:30
3 replies
no, noone actually won, also it would be more fair if teams played whole bo3 with another veto
2021-05-18 22:32
2 replies
sure, but anonymo didnt agree to that right
2021-05-18 22:33
1 reply
#47
Dosia | 
Poland iOFF
no n0p want to play same bo3 not another :D
2021-05-18 22:47
they had to replay a game they won for no reason
2021-05-18 22:39
1 reply
for no reason :DD
2021-05-18 22:40
Anonymo also had 2 chances to win
2021-05-18 22:27
22 replies
but they already won 1st so the 2nd chance was the chance to lose
2021-05-18 22:28
21 replies
half empty
2021-05-18 22:29
20 replies
#21
JW | 
Switzerland Titan))
no they had 1 chance to win
2021-05-18 22:31
19 replies
it's a video game .. if u have technical difficulties u have to sort it out
2021-05-18 22:31
18 replies
#28
JW | 
Switzerland Titan))
lmao Thats the point the tech difficulties weren't sorted to Anonymno should have gotten the win, It should never have been replayed, this is scandalous
2021-05-18 22:35
17 replies
so if u were in NiP situation with unplayable conditions such a packet loss you would be ok?
2021-05-18 22:36
16 replies
#40
JW | 
Switzerland Titan))
no but its even worse for Anonymo now :D
2021-05-18 22:42
15 replies
#55
 | 
Finland Kujis
How is it worse for nymos?
2021-05-18 23:22
14 replies
#59
JW | 
Switzerland Titan))
they played game 1 and no matter what they would do they couldn't win they had their win stolen under their nose do u understand?
2021-05-18 23:30
13 replies
#62
 | 
Finland Kujis
No matter what they would do they couldn't win? So you're telling me without an advantage they have no chance?
2021-05-18 23:34
12 replies
#63
JW | 
Switzerland Titan))
No Im saying if NiP won there would be no rematch NiP lost there is rematch basically Anonymo could not have won on the first try NiP got two chances
2021-05-19 00:00
11 replies
#65
 | 
Finland Kujis
Why would there be a rematch if NiP won? Would be pretty weird to ask for a rematch when you were in a considerable advantage.
2021-05-19 00:08
10 replies
#78
JW | 
Switzerland Titan))
dont you see how its problematic? you get two chances to win its not that hard to understand
2021-05-19 00:47
9 replies
#83
 | 
Finland Kujis
So did anonymo, except the first time they had an considerable advantage to win.
2021-05-19 01:21
8 replies
#84
JW | 
Switzerland Titan))
wtf they won the first time and it didn't count so obviously they didn't have two chances to win 1=/= 2
2021-05-19 01:35
7 replies
#85
 | 
Finland Kujis
Ok NiP had no chance to win first game so they didn't have two chances to win 1=/=2
2021-05-19 01:37
6 replies
#86
JW | 
Switzerland Titan))
they did have a chacne to win they went 16-3 (were the lags really that bad?) and then 13-16 and OT obviously the lags didn't make it unwinnable since it was so close and even without lags it was 16-14 (in a map where Anonymo might have actually played better but threw a bit) Therefore they had 2 chances to win why do you refuse to consider this and understand this? stop being hypnotized by your flair
2021-05-19 01:40
5 replies
#88
 | 
Finland Kujis
Nope, you have no proof that NiP could have won the BO3 with the lag. You're saying it was possible but have no way to prove it, so 1 chance for both :)
2021-05-19 01:43
4 replies
#89
JW | 
Switzerland Titan))
holy shit are you serious or baiting me if its bait then 8/8 they were in OT on last map, of course they could win
2021-05-19 01:44
3 replies
#90
 | 
Finland Kujis
No i don't think so. Anonymo just playing with their food i think so more views and fans coming in. NiP no chance
2021-05-19 01:45
2 replies
#91
JW | 
Switzerland Titan))
ok this must be bait. WP sir
2021-05-19 01:48
1 reply
#93
 | 
Finland Kujis
Good talk, and good night brother.
2021-05-19 01:50
I really feel bad about about this situation. This is so unfortunate for Anonymo. At least they have had decent showings against NiP, and has garnered quite a of attention they can now ride upon. Hope they continue their showings.
2021-05-18 22:28
I know Richard Lewis is seen as a bit of CS Pariah on here, but he made an excellent point in his video yesterday. In the original, and since deleted tweet of the flashpoint statement it said NIP had offered Anonymo the chance to play bo3 again or just a bo1. This highlights that NIP were way over involved in the process and that Flashpoint were being bullied into a rematch. The decision from flashpoint about the rematch and the finer details should and must be taken impartially by Flashpoint TO's. Yet NIP were dictating the terms. Suspicious that this "miswording' has now been deleted. No hate for the players of NIP, but I think that people who don't believe the NIP organization intimated Flashpoint into a rematch are being incredibly naïve. The match today concludes a really ugly affair, in which the power and money of a CS giant has overturned a precedent in a very questionable and shady manner.
2021-05-18 22:29
6 replies
#24
 | 
France Leskines
post of quality +1
2021-05-18 22:33
they just thought they will win with lags and if not they will also get 2nd chance, they had nothing to lose... except honour
2021-05-18 22:33
+1
2021-05-18 22:36
No, this was just bad wording from Flashpoint. What was meant is that NiP did not care whether bo3 or bo1 is played, so they gave the right of choice to Anonymo. Regarding the business pressure by NiP on Flashpoint: literally zero evidence was provided by either Anonymo (who first made this unsubstantiated claim) or the journalists.
2021-05-19 00:20
What pressure? All they did was use flashpoints rules They played the match through (which they had to) Filed a legit complaint Flashpoint found that they held the fault so according to the rules a rematch is necessary
2021-05-19 01:43
1 reply
Well the biggest problem is honestly the shitty rules. Everyone did follow the rules well, both Anon and NiP, even the admins in the first match
2021-05-19 01:49
If Anonymo would be in the same situation as NIP, would they just say no, we will not complain for a rematch? Is there any one (polish) who would not want a rematch? No dont think so. So try to think what you self would feel in the same situation, and then you know how other feels... . Deep down you agree
2021-05-18 22:33
#33
 | 
Latvia busterzy
ignoring the controversy and other bullcrap,the match was great
2021-05-18 22:37
1 reply
#60
 | 
France poulpup
true, but it's hard to ignore the contreversy tho :/
2021-05-18 23:30
Flashpoint had internet issues, not NiP. I feel sad for Anonymo because they had to experience this, but NiP has no responsibility in this. They lost a match solely because of an unfair advantage, it needed to be replayed no matter how you look at it.
2021-05-18 22:38
17 replies
no, your wrong, you can't take win from the team like this, nip had huuge advantage by having 2 chances to win this game
2021-05-18 22:41
10 replies
Anonymo had two chances too. Personally i think NiP could've taken the loss if they got paid a fine from Flashpoint and an apology was issued to both NiP and Anonymo. But this would never happen.
2021-05-18 22:47
9 replies
anonymo did not have 2 chances to win but one to win(og match) and extra one to lose
2021-05-18 22:48
6 replies
#56
 | 
Finland Kujis
NiP had 1 chance to lose(og match) and extra one to win
2021-05-18 23:24
5 replies
no they had chance to lose/win and to win so 1:2
2021-05-19 00:09
4 replies
#68
 | 
Finland Kujis
Not true.
2021-05-19 00:11
3 replies
how is this not true, lmao
2021-05-19 00:29
2 replies
#82
 | 
Finland Kujis
If that's true, it applies to anonymo too. They played the same 2 games, they had the same 2 chances (not counting the fact that the other team had an disadvantage in the OG GAME).
2021-05-19 01:15
1 reply
yeah but why wuold you play another game after you won once?
2021-05-19 09:38
#61
 | 
France poulpup
if nip won the first game, they'll have been no rematch anonymo had to win the 2 games to win for real nip could either win the first or the second to win
2021-05-18 23:32
1 reply
But NiP had 0 chances to win because of bad circumstances, Anonymo won because of unfair advantage. So Anonymo had 2 chances to win and NiP had 1.
2021-05-19 00:08
#50
Dosia | 
Poland iOFF
idk did ever in counter strike history you take win from team? i think its first time and its ridicoulous situation
2021-05-18 22:50
5 replies
And what about NiP? They were robbed too.
2021-05-18 23:03
4 replies
#54
Dosia | 
Poland iOFF
and you see what kind of things they do to just get rematch? i have only one # for this and all matches #doubleDIGITS :D and no nip not robbed they play with not fu*king lags cry1vice cant accept lose with this trash ceo and $ do things when you show me from their pov how game look i mean not server pov i mean from behind them i belive you ;) anyway nip doing like cry babies who cant accept lose i will easy accept lose when ano will lose in 1st match but they were force by BabiesInPyjamas to rematch and then lose 14-16 and kiddos from Skan (most likely) start to be cocky asf and they almost lost to (tier 3 team lul) gn brother i hope you not one of those kiddos
2021-05-18 23:07
3 replies
Sorry but there is too much proof. You are just lying now. Flashpoint is to blame for everything, they caused NiP to have routing issues. I have respect for Anonymo and this is a very unfortunate situation.
2021-05-19 00:07
Your stupid rant has nothing to do with facts. Flashpoint confirmed that the network issues indeed affected NIP.
2021-05-19 00:23
1 reply
#95
Dosia | 
Poland iOFF
$$$ and popular of org is enough ;D
2021-05-19 09:30
Both had two tries actually
2021-05-18 22:42
1 reply
??? anonymo only had extra chance to lose
2021-05-18 22:46
Anonymo just secured an easier bracket for themselves in which they actually have a chance to go deeper in the tournament, thats not too sad lol
2021-05-18 22:44
1 reply
#51
Dosia | 
Poland iOFF
eeeeeeee they can match to fpx? and if they lose they still play but if they lose to hyenas they out??????? hmmmm
2021-05-18 22:51
I loved device, now i hate him and nip.
2021-05-18 22:45
1 reply
#52
Dosia | 
Poland iOFF
same
2021-05-18 22:51
#45
 | 
Sweden ALVO
People attacking the players personally are so fucking wrong, they have done their job like you do on your workplace or in you're classroom. Get you're shit together and wake up
2021-05-18 22:46
1 reply
+1
2021-05-19 00:12
indeed
2021-05-18 22:46
it's only a one game there will be plenty more in the future
2021-05-19 00:39
first replay in cs history and its because 1 big org lost and got mad + flashpoint is trashpoint... its just weird that there is genuinely people who say that replay was the way to go and it was somehow deserved, this is like a referee giving penalty in soccer game and after game you want replay coz you lost of the penalty given. No sport should work like this. 2 wrongs dont make a right and this replay was just 1 big mistake. only positive side is now everyone hates nip, people laugh about them even today on a fucking dota major they started laughing in the cast when players had ping issues saying stuff like ´´admins be ready they will ask replay like some team in csgo lul kekw´´
2021-05-19 00:44
#81
 | 
France Foffy
I feel like they got robbed too, but that's flashpoint's decision. I hope they don't take everything too light in the future, this shouldn't have been replayed if the issue was not found in time and NIP didn't want to be disqualified for tech issue
2021-05-19 00:56
I think Anonymo can beat Hyenas seeing them play without packet loss
2021-05-19 01:53
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.