Thread has been deleted
Last comment
NiP bias
 | 
Sweden ezwuo 
Does anyone really think that Anonymo would get a rematch if they were in NiP's shoes? No way, they're irrelevant compared to NiP. This is the key detail that fans have missed, we don't have equality.
2021-05-19 00:06
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
true
2021-05-19 00:07
#2
 | 
Lithuania karkeris
+1
2021-05-19 00:07
#3
 | 
Sweden Valta
that's how life is
2021-05-19 00:08
special treatment for rich org
2021-05-19 00:08
1 reply
Well its not a special treatment, if everything was according to rulebook. When someone is saying that anonymo would not get a rematch, than they saying, that flashpoint would break the rules in that case. Which might happened, but most probably not.
2021-05-19 16:38
We will never know I guess, perhaps not. But there will be increased focus on the subject in the future, that’s for sure.
2021-05-19 00:09
#6
 | 
Italy I_like_csgo
As far as I understand, Flashpoint's ruleset was just very shitty and the rematch was maybe justified within the rules
2021-05-19 00:10
1 reply
it was entirely justified under the ruleset. however i don't think it is flashpoints' rules. it is valve rules.
2021-05-19 16:55
Unlucky for them, blaming nIp for being a relevant team is not a good point
2021-05-19 00:12
#8
 | 
United States fatburger
flag doesnt check out but +1
2021-05-19 02:58
#9
 | 
Italy steven513
+ein
2021-05-19 03:01
honestly they probably wouldn't, but it's still all on flashpoint. They're the ones who forced the match to continue and they're the ones with improper server settings. All bias aside, there's one entity you should blame and thats flashpoint.
2021-05-19 03:07
nip is bad
2021-05-19 03:31
Welcome to real world
2021-05-19 03:40
you have 0 proof
2021-05-19 03:41
Had NIP wiped the floor with Anonymo, then they could tell themselves that it was only cuz of the lag. Considering they struggled and now stole the win, it looks even worse for them.
2021-05-19 03:48
6 replies
what in the world are you on about, this is all flashpoints fault
2021-05-19 16:28
5 replies
Flashpoints fault was for telling NIP to play, but what NIP should've done is NOT play and told FP to fuck off and reschedule. They chose to play in hopes they'd win -- they didnt. Then they malded on twitter and used their NIP slip influence to get a rematch. Both are clowns. People defending them are also clowns.
2021-05-19 17:01
4 replies
they "chose" to play because they had no other choice lol
2021-05-19 17:38
3 replies
Oh right, they were at gunpoint?
2021-05-19 17:54
2 replies
NA logic lmao the only way to force someone is to point a gun at their head
2021-05-19 18:43
1 reply
Expected beta response, I assume you often get forced to do things just by people telling you to do it. NIP had the power to tell Flashpoint to fuck off, they have more to lose with bad PR if the team got pissed and left the server. And guess what, they doubled down and let NIP have the rematch, which measn they DID have a choice regarding this all long, they were just a bunch of pussies and only cried when they officially lost. Take the L buddy.
2021-05-19 22:09
Nip didnt have to put pressure Everything they did was perfectly within the rulebook all anon has to do is the same thing that nip did
2021-05-19 04:04
U don't know that...
2021-05-19 04:06
#21
 | 
Australia poppyxox
victim mentality
2021-05-19 04:09
8 replies
Tell that to xizt, getright , forest about the victim mentality. When the org takes the price money of players to distribute among the staff
2021-05-19 04:23
7 replies
#24
 | 
Australia poppyxox
.... that literally occurs for the majority of organisations lmao you do understand that they need a return from their business, right? if they're not making money from anywhere else how do you expect them to pay the salaries of everyone involved who is signed by contract if players had to rely so heavily on prize money, esports would not be where it is today. how do you think people who arent winning trophies are still sustaining themselves? (if you actually meant exactly what i just said, then yeah of course it would be dumb to complain about that sorta thing but you cant say anything ur not behind the scenes, plus ive never heard about that)
2021-05-19 05:22
6 replies
Basically, ceo of nip stole a lot of money from the old roster of nip. Im understand the business perspective of the rematch. But nip management don't start with a clean sheet in terms of fair business. That's why ppl tend to defend anynomo, even pro players.
2021-05-19 15:24
2 replies
#28
 | 
Finland Kujis
Let me fix this for you: The old CEO of NiP who has already been replaced a few years ago, stole a lot of money from the old roster of NiP.
2021-05-19 15:37
1 reply
#33
 | 
Sweden ezwuo
The current CEO Hicham was also involved with some of the shady shit they did in NiP.
2021-05-19 16:23
#54
 | 
United States Azaqa
Haha yea its totally fucking normal to make a contract with your players (world class btw) and then not pay the agreed salary, and run away with the money. Typical casual business move.
2021-05-19 22:13
2 replies
#61
 | 
Australia poppyxox
i mean... yeah? lol? im assuming this is early esports days we're talking about here, you dont think that wouldnt have occured a lot back then? you dont think that still occurs to this day? all private business will always have a corrupt facet to it regardless of the industry but in regard to what i said, i wasnt entirely sure what jockonet was implying cause i had never heard of the situation before, so im just considering a possible angle
2021-05-20 02:48
1 reply
#64
 | 
United States Azaqa
This is like 2014 bro... NiP were a world class team and there were majors going on with large prize pools... no other org did the shit NiP did at that time
2021-05-20 05:10
This is the thing that bug me. Also, the reputation of the ceo and the org in generaI triggers me. I understand for the nip's player.
2021-05-19 04:18
7 replies
#31
 | 
Finland Kujis
95% of the ORG has been recruited in 2020/2021, CEO came in 2016. Money stealing scandal was from 2014 and prior. How can the reputation of the ORG be bad when literally no one in the active duty wasn't even there then.
2021-05-19 15:48
6 replies
Fifflaren's accusation point the current CEO, but I guess if I was part of, he plays a minor role . Fifflaren just want the money back and ask the current CEO to do something about it. I misjudged the implication of the current CEO. Anyway, nip won fair and square the rematch. I was preaching for a move on and don't replay. They won the replay, so I guess we have to move on.
2021-05-19 16:18
#34
 | 
Sweden ezwuo
Per Lillefelth in 2015 aswell.
2021-05-19 16:24
1 reply
#39
 | 
Finland Kujis
What about Per, left in 2015.
2021-05-19 16:32
#55
 | 
United States Azaqa
CEO still scumbag
2021-05-19 22:13
2 replies
#56
 | 
Finland Kujis
Almost as big of a scumbag as anonymos CEO
2021-05-19 22:19
1 reply
#57
 | 
United States Azaqa
???????? what did anonymo ceo do other than professional response saying to just move on from the bullshit
2021-05-19 22:20
Yea proly not
2021-05-19 15:25
#27
 | 
CIS sasha1608
#equality LMAO
2021-05-19 15:26
just take the L already. have a nice Wednesday
2021-05-19 15:39
#30
 | 
Poland xMBTx
winning bo3 by anonymo (nip fought tooth and nails in this bo3) was a way to SURVIVE in this match, if the lost it they wouldnt have a chance at all (0 chance), for anonymo this bo3 was like semifinals and the replay was the final, for nip this bo3 was a freeroll, and the replay was the final thats why nip had 2 chances and its no fair to have 2 chances vs 1 chance and on top of that, nip ASKED for 2 chances, nip ASKED for this match to not be fair, they are not stupid, they fully acknowledged that that wouldnt be fair at all = nip ceo scammer and some u say about "competitive integrity" "sportsmanlike behaviour" "justice", guys NIP dont have it in their dictionary
2021-05-19 15:39
#35
 | 
Sweden randigdot
If it was revers ihope it shud. i think it was the right decison but i think sadly you are tru
2021-05-19 16:25
#36
 | 
Sweden kresso
Ninjas with -1mil In Paypal
2021-05-19 16:26
+1 there is NO WAY they would get a rematch
2021-05-19 16:27
I think all in Nip lineup would say yes to a re-game again. Anonymo could absolutely win. But should be fair from start and it was not. So this blaming on Nip is little low when all they asked was for a even battlefield to begin with. Sad for Anonymo though. Flashpoint should be to blame not the professional players. But best solution in my opinion. Should be a Bo3 Mirage.. Then nobody could say it was unfair.
2021-05-19 16:35
1 reply
#42
Polin | 
Europe Daudy
Nip made 2 msitkes tho. Playing out the match and asking / accepting / playeing the rematch. Flashpoint carries majority of the blame for the situation. Nip carries some blame (mostly management, from palyers its only device because he fired the shitstorm and in that department anonymo players carry blame too)
2021-05-19 16:42
If NIP had that much influence on organizers why they weren't able to convince them for a reschedule when they faced lag at start of first map???
2021-05-19 16:42
True +1
2021-05-19 17:02
+1
2021-05-19 17:40
#49
 | 
India lancamk
I still wonder why rematch not started from 1:0 in maps for NiP - t**point forced a rematch because of %loss. (allright, skip that) they beat anonymo on lags so it means that map shouldnt be replayed if they had spikes on nuke and mirage should be replayed in this case. but ya if that would be happen community could be went crazy
2021-05-19 17:44
1 reply
I mean, move your brain cells please
2021-05-19 22:23
+1
2021-05-19 17:55
If it was Anonymo, no way in god name Flashpoint would do the rematch. Firstly, they couldn't care less about some new team. Plus, NiP would whine and protest for days if that was the case.
2021-05-19 22:26
That's obvious , my friend))) but just like everywhere relevancy , sponsorship > all
2021-05-19 22:34
#62
 | 
Finland Mestari_
+1
2021-05-20 02:48
who cars about the past focus on the present
2021-05-20 02:51
#65
 | 
Poland xMBTx
Ofc not Its a scam in a daylight
2021-05-20 05:14
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.