special treatment for rich org
We will never know I guess, perhaps not. But there will be increased focus on the subject in the future, that’s for sure.
As far as I understand, Flashpoint's ruleset was just very shitty and the rematch was maybe justified within the rules
Unlucky for them, blaming nIp for being a relevant team is not a good point
flag doesnt check out but +1
honestly they probably wouldn't, but it's still all on flashpoint. They're the ones who forced the match to continue and they're the ones with improper server settings. All bias aside, there's one entity you should blame and thats flashpoint.
Had NIP wiped the floor with Anonymo, then they could tell themselves that it was only cuz of the lag.
Considering they struggled and now stole the win, it looks even worse for them.
Nip didnt have to put pressure
Everything they did was perfectly within the rulebook all anon has to do is the same thing that nip did
This is the thing that bug me. Also, the reputation of the ceo and the org in generaI triggers me. I understand for the nip's player.
just take the L already. have a nice Wednesday
winning bo3 by anonymo (nip fought tooth and nails in this bo3) was a way to SURVIVE in this match, if the lost it they wouldnt have a chance at all (0 chance), for anonymo this bo3 was like semifinals and the replay was the final,
for nip this bo3 was a freeroll, and the replay was the final
thats why nip had 2 chances and its no fair to have 2 chances vs 1 chance
and on top of that, nip ASKED for 2 chances, nip ASKED for this match to not be fair, they are not stupid, they fully acknowledged that that wouldnt be fair at all = nip ceo scammer
and some u say about "competitive integrity" "sportsmanlike behaviour" "justice", guys NIP dont have it in their dictionary
If it was revers ihope it shud. i think it was the right decison but i think sadly you are tru
Ninjas with -1mil In Paypal
+1 there is NO WAY they would get a rematch
I think all in Nip lineup would say yes to a re-game again. Anonymo could absolutely win.
But should be fair from start and it was not. So this blaming on Nip is little low when all they asked was for a even battlefield to begin with. Sad for Anonymo though. Flashpoint should be to blame not the professional players. But best solution in my opinion. Should be a Bo3 Mirage.. Then nobody could say it was unfair.
If NIP had that much influence on organizers why they weren't able to convince them for a reschedule when they faced lag at start of first map???
I still wonder why rematch not started from 1:0 in maps for NiP - t**point forced a rematch because of %loss. (allright, skip that) they beat anonymo on lags so it means that map shouldnt be replayed if they had spikes on nuke and mirage should be replayed in this case.
but ya if that would be happen community could be went crazy
If it was Anonymo, no way in god name Flashpoint would do the rematch. Firstly, they couldn't care less about some new team. Plus, NiP would whine and protest for days if that was the case.
That's obvious , my friend))) but just like everywhere relevancy , sponsorship > all
who cars about the past focus on the present
Its a scam in a daylight