Thread has been deleted
Last comment
87-0-NIP vs. current NIP
ropz | 
Other Smurfhits2000 
If the old 87-0-NIP from 2013 would face the current NIP in a B03 without any preparation, who would win?
2021-06-08 15:08
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
why did you write B03 and not BO3, what's wrong with you?
2021-06-08 15:09
29 replies
+1 thats disgusting
2021-06-08 15:14
22 replies
what’s wr0ng with that?
2021-06-08 15:13
21 replies
instead of best of 3 ur saying best 03, doesnt make sense
2021-06-08 15:14
20 replies
So it should be B0f3?
2021-06-08 15:17
19 replies
if you want to type like an edgelord, yes. best 0f 3, cool cool
2021-06-08 15:19
dude just accept u fucked up, stop shaming urself even more, damn
2021-06-08 15:20
16 replies
Sure :(
2021-06-08 15:21
12 replies
young generations cant fucking accept being wrong and taking responsibility, its incredible
2021-06-08 15:22
11 replies
I’ll try and be the change you want to see in the world, meljan. It’s wrong to write B03, since the abbreviation refere to the word ”of”. Thanks for this.
2021-06-08 15:27
7 replies
#40
 | 
Brunei Venicious
No its not him, its everyone. 0 isnt the same as o
2021-06-08 15:50
6 replies
I must say though pointing it out just creating shit talking nothing productive. But I suppose it is HLTV.
2021-06-08 15:53
5 replies
#45
 | 
Brunei Venicious
What is productive about your comment? I dont even who youre talking to
2021-06-08 15:57
4 replies
0/8
2021-06-09 14:07
3 replies
#105
 | 
Brunei Venicious
Haha that says enough about you and your deluded comment, straight 0/8 when youre out of words and get owned
2021-06-09 15:25
2 replies
Why because your comment was pointless and then you proceed to "own" me by calling my comment pointless? What are you 12? (nvm judging by comment history all you do is talk shit so that answers itself)
2021-06-09 15:59
1 reply
#116
 | 
Brunei Venicious
Lol, first of all why should comments on a forum be productive anyways? Besides that, how is it not productive to explain someone 0 isnt the same as o, imagine someone writing sentences making use of both randomly. Im only pointing out that youre comment is hypocrite as mine was more productive since yours wasnt and will never be. Then proceed to say 0/8 when you have nothing to say. Then go assume my age since again you have nothing better to say
2021-06-09 16:06
#66
 | 
Portugal W!LDF1RE
It's just a letter, chill chap
2021-06-08 17:24
#81
 | 
Sweden GabeM
He said sure and you drag it on because he wrote a zero instead of o like waht are you doing??
2021-06-09 14:25
that is literally just a human thing, not related to age whatsoever lmfao
2021-06-09 14:51
fucked up, shaming yourself....wow! the question is what the fuck is wrong with you? 😂
2021-06-08 18:38
Hahahaha what the fuck is wrong with people on this website "stop shaming yourself". lmaooo hltv is full of autists no joke.
2021-06-09 14:07
1 reply
this page is full of insecure people tho
2021-06-09 14:48
#102
 | 
Australia ClydeIoF
ouch
2021-06-09 15:17
#33
 | 
Sweden Skunk2
epic trollface moment
2021-06-08 15:32
1 reply
#59
Bruh | 
Finland ihanok
rolfeis
2021-06-08 17:07
DOESN'T THERE HAVE SOMETHING MORE USEFUL FOR YOU TO WORRY NO?
2021-06-08 18:17
#79
 | 
Serbia hltvmens
holy shit
2021-06-09 14:22
If that actually triggers you, you have a very very short fuse and anger problems. Trouble at home ? Talk to someone if you don't have a activity or person you can do to let some stress or anger out.
2021-06-09 14:40
1 reply
I mean, I don't know you but if you can really derive such extensive conclusions from one comment that has very mixed emotions attached to it, then you really should think about a career path in psychology. I think you'll be good at it! :D
2021-06-09 15:44
now ZTR left the old NIP will win but with ZTR ez new NIP
2021-06-08 15:09
8 replies
+1000
2021-06-08 15:10
0/8
2021-06-08 15:11
i dont get hltv first everyone said -ztr and now hes gone people say ztr was good?
2021-06-08 15:11
5 replies
Only noob idiot scrubs said -ztr
2021-06-08 15:13
is ur iq below 0?He just pointed an obvious thing that they just got new player so he doesn't know a lot of things & how they play in most scenarios while ztr already knew some calls & plays so it would put current NiP in disadvantage.
2021-06-08 15:13
1 reply
#83
 | 
Sweden GabeM
Chill man he just thought it was so typical of hltv to hate on a player and then want him back.
2021-06-09 14:27
When people said -ztr they were expecting something like " -ztr +somethinggood" , i think that if people knew said replacement was lnz the reaction would be different
2021-06-08 16:06
1 reply
actually good point
2021-06-08 17:34
87-0 nip
2021-06-08 15:11
Probably old nip Forest too stonk
2021-06-08 15:11
2 replies
nah, old competition was just whack
2021-06-08 17:16
1 reply
+1 everyone knew how to play 1999-2013 and then 2015-2021 but it stopped inbetween
2021-06-09 15:40
skill ceiling has raised so much, its not even a question
2021-06-08 15:11
3 replies
anyone thinking otherwise is purely wrong
2021-06-08 17:20
2 replies
+1
2021-06-08 18:22
#95
RpK | 
France HippzZ
+1
2021-06-09 14:53
#10
 | 
Brazil uselessz
89-0
2021-06-08 15:12
1 reply
+1
2021-06-08 17:09
#11
 | 
Ireland kdorek
You can't underestimate what 8 years of meta do to the game. 87-0 NIP would look like a tier 3-4 team. So against current NIP would be 5050.
2021-06-08 15:12
5 replies
keked
2021-06-08 15:15
+111111111111111111
2021-06-08 17:14
rofl
2021-06-08 18:21
8/8
2021-06-09 14:33
not even. go watch their old clips they are legit worse than lvl 5s in faceit now
2021-06-09 14:43
#15
 | 
Albania gamer97
f0rest ez 1vs5
2021-06-08 15:14
#16
 | 
France Uexo
bro probably 16-2 twice for current NiP just #9
2021-06-08 15:14
new nip cs 2021 ison another level
2021-06-08 15:15
nip 2-0 nip ez
2021-06-08 15:17
new nip would literally 32-0 old nip
2021-06-08 15:24
i think NIP will win
2021-06-08 15:24
1 reply
+1 I think so too
2021-06-08 17:04
#28
 | 
Serbia LtN))
old nip ez
2021-06-08 15:24
1 reply
#103
 | 
Australia ClydeIoF
HeatoN to carry
2021-06-09 15:18
#29
 | 
Korea jin67300
87-0 nip
2021-06-08 15:26
#31
 | 
United States gweees
current nip cs has progressed way past 2013 cs look at how good they were on dignitas.
2021-06-08 15:31
Everyone who says old nip has no idea of the game. Back then the Utility usage was so fucking bad, it was aiming only. Best example is smooya when he played for Chaos. The Utility usage there was so trash that he was just smurfing around. Quote "there were games where i didnt get flashed once".
2021-06-08 15:31
#34
 | 
Brazil diGzN
current nip would win today, this is just like comparing football teams today with older ones. for example, people in br like to compare today's national team with the one with pele that won 3 world cups. it is obvious that the current one will win, despite the fact that the 1994 one was way better compared to other teams
2021-06-08 15:36
I mean Dignitas tried to "revive" old NiP and it ended not good. Only f0rest can play at t1 level from them.
2021-06-08 15:39
Even the now Dignitas Lineup would 32-0 old NiP
2021-06-08 15:39
1 reply
Yea because it would be 5 vs 3
2021-06-08 16:04
2013 nip because f0rest was young and get_right was young
2021-06-08 15:44
#38
 | 
Czech Republic Solace_
I mean since you said no preparation then the old NiP would go play all the remade maps they never played before for the first time. 32-0 for the new NiP.
2021-06-08 15:46
#39
 | 
Switzerland Schwandi
The skill of current pros is way higher than in the old days just because of the natural evolution of the game. Any current team in the top 30 would most likely 2:0 old NiP.
2021-06-08 15:46
#41
 | 
Russia Soawii
new nip easily, it will work the same way with any other team.
2021-06-08 15:51
new nip
2021-06-08 15:53
#46
 | 
Finland suomiye
I recently watched old csgo matches and bro its literally the definition of all aim no brain.
2021-06-08 15:58
87-0 NIP because Todays NIP members were toddlers 8 years ago
2021-06-08 15:59
New NiP cause they can pick either Vertigo or Ancient and have 1 map they'll 100% win since old NiP never played those (and also pro CS has become more refined, utility usage is better and pros play an overall more efficient CS)
2021-06-08 16:04
Any top 30 team would beat old NiP
2021-06-08 16:11
#52
 | 
Estonia thisba!tes
Ez for current NIP for sure
2021-06-08 16:12
WELL, i guess the winner will be......NiP?
2021-06-08 16:17
#54
 | 
Europe elefiveS
if they are playing older maps like d2, mirage and inferno then EZ for old nip fiff < device xizt = hampus forest > rez GTR > plopski friberg > Lnz or ztr
2021-06-08 16:19
1 reply
xizt = hampus??? no lol xizt > hampus
2021-06-08 16:50
ez for nip
2021-06-08 16:44
Depends on game version duh. On current not a question that new nip. On old maybe old nip, but idk.
2021-06-08 16:50
#63
 | 
Poland r_e_x
I think that current top50 team are better than top1 in 2013, 2014. Everybody got much better, and also gaming conditions are on a lot higher lvl
2021-06-08 17:19
#65
 | 
Czech Republic Za1Lo
probably new NIP just bcs they are younger and players who played in NIP before are already 30yo and not good as before, but if we take they are still playing as before then for sure 87-0 NIP
2021-06-08 17:23
#67
 | 
Brazil ghcnvbkn
new NIP 2-0 old NIP
2021-06-08 17:34
ofc new nip lol
2021-06-08 17:35
new, ofc
2021-06-08 18:14
new nip since meta back in 2013-2014 is literally just 1.6 strats
2021-06-09 08:10
new nip would lose at first but win the rematch
2021-06-09 14:22
1 reply
never gets old
2021-06-09 14:41
0/8 topic
2021-06-09 14:24
old nip ofc
2021-06-09 14:27
#84
 | 
Canada DeFeCtO_
Probably the new NIP considered how the meta and tactics has evolved, the old classic strats may no longer work
2021-06-09 14:27
new nip obviously, 2013 the game wasnt this evolved
2021-06-09 14:34
New nip, the players from 2013 would be hard countered by popflashes and set smokes alone
2021-06-09 14:36
I think it would end with something like 16-2 16-0. Back in the days you could be a top players knowing 3 stuff per map. Doesn't mean that the new line up is more talented of course but the game, the meta and the overall level of the scene have improved tremendously.
2021-06-09 14:39
2013 was still the time where you could have massive hangovers and still make it to finals, so of course any top 30 team would beat NIP 2013
2021-06-09 14:41
4 replies
tbh 5 top1000 faceit users could beat pro team from 2013, skill celling is so high now
2021-06-09 15:16
3 replies
great story. however, nip already humiliated s1mple, device and everyone else in the scene you consider top players. gtr was 100 times better than f0rest and then he dipped heavily in 2016 while f0rest dipped very little. f0rest is still at the very least top3 in sweden and he never put in the work. if gtr was so much better than f0rest back then then you should probably connect the dots yourself before typing dumb shit. when you get older, you play less, you care less and you become worse. that doesn't mean that you were never great just because you are worse now. nip was better than everyone individually and as a team back when they actually had the hunger to win and xizt, f0rest and gtr did it across 2 completely different games too. they did it even after csgo was changed completely with the animation+hitbox changes. they were the 2nd best team of 2016 and they humiliated all those superior players in their prime despite being way past theirs. you, however, are just the typical hltv ape, not good at anything but full of dumb opinions to embarrass yourself
2021-06-09 15:37
2 replies
if you put team from 2013 vs right now they will lose. We talk about ppl from 2013 not about if f0rest and company reunited as it is now
2021-06-09 15:57
go and open any match listed from 2013 and watch someone play rn, and don't be such overconfient moron
2021-06-09 15:59
NIP 2013 because Fifflaren
2021-06-09 15:18
not a good topic
2021-06-09 15:46
#113
 | 
Greece Graecos
NiP 2013 guys are too old, only f0rest is still good.
2021-06-09 15:59
87-0 NiP = worse than SJ Gaming 2021
2021-06-09 16:00
Random 10lvl faceit stack would dismantle any 2013-2014 professional team.
2021-06-09 16:01
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.