Thread has been deleted
Last comment
should he be charged?????
SPUNJ | 
Canada civilpizza78 
twitter.com/i/events/1423048983635705861 part of me doesn't think he should. it happened 80 yrs ago, and idk it was a war. Everyone does bad things in wartime. I think it should be left alone
2021-08-06 02:07
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
#1
TACO | 
Germany kekeke_
if he’s somehow connected to the 3,5k deaths it’s deserved.
2021-08-06 02:09
16 replies
if your actually german, the chances of your grandpa/ great-grandpa being responsible for a lot of deaths is really high. would you want your grandpa to be charged for something he did 80 yrs ago?
2021-08-06 02:11
15 replies
Why’s that? Only a select few of a special military camp where responsible for death caps…
2021-08-06 02:14
7 replies
doesnt change what i said
2021-08-06 02:20
6 replies
So It’s not really high
2021-08-06 02:22
5 replies
nah it is, if you only think jews died in camps ur lost
2021-08-06 02:22
4 replies
I don’t think that… not everyone was in the army and not everyone was committed war crimes, soliders and then POWs have been detained and if evidence was found further punished
2021-08-06 02:25
3 replies
there was conscription back then buddy a lot of men were in the army, aka I'm right
2021-08-06 02:29
2 replies
#56
 | 
Czech Republic JakamanCZ
Lol so what? It´s not like they could refuse. Regular soldiers shouldn´t be punished, they had nothing to do with the death camps ... Killing your enemy during a war (as a regular soldier), isn´t a crime imo, no matter what side are you at. Genocide, war crimes, rapes etc. that´s where normal people usually draw the line ...
2021-08-06 02:48
1 reply
okay that actually makes alot of sense, ty
2021-08-06 02:56
yes, my grandad is german when the war happened he just left to netherlands, if he did what he did it's because he was in favour of killing those innocent people.
2021-08-06 02:14
1 reply
if you were put in the same situations as those men back then I can say with 80% certainty that you would have been responsible for deaths
2021-08-06 02:22
chances are really low actually
2021-08-06 02:20
im jewish…
2021-08-06 03:28
2 replies
understandable, srry if this was hard topic for you
2021-08-06 03:30
1 reply
nah, it’s ok :) no worries.
2021-08-06 03:32
What is life in prison without parole, Alex. EDIT: what I'm saying is, yeah, they should be. Someone who killed someone else 80 years ago, if they're found out, have already avoided the worst that can happen to them. They are just as culpable as anyone else, either way. It doesn't just absolve them. Also, as I know people personally who fled Germany at the time, I know their stance is basically the same as mine.
2021-08-06 03:37
He should have just run to Sweden - apparently they like protecting murderers.
2021-08-06 02:12
1 reply
Or just go to America and say it was self-defense
2021-08-06 02:42
#4
 | 
United States gweees
Yeah he should. Its not like he's gonna serve any of it anyway but he deserves it.
2021-08-06 02:13
No
2021-08-06 02:13
Of course, being old doesn't ilegitimate crimes commited
2021-08-06 02:14
Her a killer, ofc why do you even ask
2021-08-06 02:14
If they have the evidence then ofc… you can’t just let someone get away with it because it happend a while ago
2021-08-06 02:14
Yes ofc why would he not be he was involved in the deaths of 3500 ppl
2021-08-06 02:15
i just see good stats epic kd, top 1 this year, 3500 kd
2021-08-06 02:15
1 reply
lmao
2021-08-06 02:17
I dont know just let the man live the last few years of his life
2021-08-06 02:16
2 replies
What about the lifes he took away?
2021-08-06 02:18
They already let this man live his whole life without a punishment, would be deserved if they put him in jail rn
2021-08-06 02:18
Man I don't know. My instinct was yes, who cares he's lived a good life he can get a bit of punishment for the pain he's caused But in terms of actual justice, I think if he's proven to be an upstanding citizen for the rest of his life post-war, punishment is kind of pointless. Nothing to rehabilitate at that point
2021-08-06 02:17
8 replies
Isn't pointless for those who suffered and their generations, but by the pov that happened past century, you might be right, but I don't think so
2021-08-06 02:20
2 replies
You're absolutely right, and if I were the one impacted I would probably feel differently, but as a whole I think the justice system works better if it is designed for rehabilitation over punishment
2021-08-06 02:24
1 reply
I think that too, but this isn't a common crime, is an extraordinary crime. but yeah, rehabilitation over punishment
2021-08-06 02:29
That’s not the only point of prison tho
2021-08-06 02:20
4 replies
I know it's not, I'm speaking in my perspective on how I think it should be not how it is
2021-08-06 02:23
3 replies
It should only be rehabilitation? No punishment?
2021-08-06 02:26
2 replies
yep! the studies show its better on preventing it too
2021-08-06 02:30
1 reply
#65
 | 
United States burNout_
+1 usually true, except for people like serial killers or other special cases, the people who cannot be rehabilitated.
2021-08-06 03:13
no
2021-08-06 02:27
9 replies
Reply needs actual content
2021-08-06 02:30
8 replies
what do you mean
2021-08-06 02:31
7 replies
This is not a quiz, so we expect one or two argument, especially a controversial reply as 'no' in this context
2021-08-06 02:34
6 replies
no beacuse he is old and will die soon anyway,man suffers enough already
2021-08-06 02:35
5 replies
2021-08-06 02:36
4 replies
i disagree
2021-08-06 02:38
3 replies
why?
2021-08-06 02:38
2 replies
2021-08-06 02:39
1 reply
So being old ilegitimate a crime?
2021-08-06 02:39
#35
 | 
Sweden Skunk2
seems pointless but i dont think i will cry for someone who directly contributed to the holocaust. He knew what he was doing and did it anyways... sickening
2021-08-06 02:31
2 replies
Yeah, have you heard about Eichmann Trial? He states that he didn't know the impact on what he was doing, for him was just a normal day in the office, because he got brainwashed
2021-08-06 02:41
1 reply
#53
 | 
Sweden Skunk2
very interesting!
2021-08-06 02:44
#36
 | 
Iceland Jaksin
Bro, he's an old ass man. He'll die soon anyway.
2021-08-06 02:34
7 replies
He lived enough being free, time to pay for what he did
2021-08-06 02:35
6 replies
#43
 | 
Iceland Jaksin
Should've done it when he was young, not when he's an old ass man.
2021-08-06 02:37
5 replies
Nobody knew when he was younger, so know that we know that he's related to, he should pay
2021-08-06 02:39
4 replies
#52
 | 
Iceland Jaksin
Don't really agree with doing this to a 100 year old man. Disagree if you want, I can't stop ya.
2021-08-06 02:42
3 replies
By this logic, perpetue prison shouldn't be allowed, because they never gonna be free
2021-08-06 02:45
2 replies
#59
 | 
Iceland Jaksin
I don't know what that means so I'm gonna assume you mean a Lifetime sentence. Yeah, it shouldn't be allowed. If someone's an 80 year old man I don't believe they should be kept in prison. Let them live the last of their days in a frail body outside of prison.
2021-08-06 02:54
1 reply
Yes, that's what I meant. This is very complicated, in Brazil for example, the max time that he can be in jail it's 30 years, don't matter if he's condened for 682 years. But when you think about Pedrinho Matador, a serial killer that murdered 78 oficially, bited his father's heart and sttabed 20 times, and is out, you have a different pov, but I understand your pov and respect
2021-08-06 02:59
The man is 100, let him live out his last years.
2021-08-06 02:35
3 replies
I don't think so pal, he was free for so many years and didn't paid for what he did
2021-08-06 02:36
2 replies
Except you forgot the part where they said he allegedly did. It’s not confirmed. Innocent till proven guilty, not guilty till proven innocent. You do realize this just waste tax payers dollars.
2021-08-06 02:50
1 reply
I'm not, I state considering legit his actions, and by this logic, it doesn't makes any sense asks if he deserves, since it's not confirmed
2021-08-06 02:54
why wasn't he charged before and being trialed only now?
2021-08-06 02:37
2 replies
No evidence?
2021-08-06 03:04
1 reply
and they managed to find it only now? lol. who gives a fuck at this point he should have been executed in his young years, not when he spend his whole life unpunished. one lucky nazi prick
2021-08-06 03:16
waste of money
2021-08-06 02:46
2 replies
^ noone actually gives a fuck about them old geezers. the whole purpose of these court cases is to show the rest of the world "look, we're fighting nazis!!" by throwing people in jail that are a 100 years old and never even broke any laws of the state that's prosecuting them. if they caught them after the war, sure. but now it's completely pointless and honestly kinda crazy.
2021-08-06 02:54
Justice has to be served or no?
2021-08-06 03:05
The most retarded thing I can think of is comparing ethics in the most peaceful time period to a time period that was almost 100 years ago and was considered one of the worst times alive to be a human.
2021-08-06 03:20
1 reply
actually big brain
2021-08-06 03:23
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.