No. You are just being stupid.
"Stavn top 12 in 2020 not superstar even tho he still plays basically the same for heroic and he is "Maybe""
- Yes, he was top 12, but he necessarily isn't like a superstar player, who could carry the team. He's just extremely consistent performer. Not a flashy player but consistent. 1.13 rating isn't THAT amazing.
"Then you put sh1ro and ax1le as superstars even tho they didnt reach top20 ever but you reason they are super stars because they were this year but then you dont put up mantuu or hades there who for this year are much better than syrson despite their teams being worse."
- Can you not read? I said that this list includes players who were playing like superstars in 2020. Syrson played like a superstar and had 1.16 rating. Mantuu has been very good thi year, but his performance in important games and his 0.98 rating against top 5 teams simply means that he's not superstar caliber yet. Hades plays mostly against tier 2-3 teams so there is absolutely NO WAY he's a superstar.
Sh1ro and Ax1le will defenitely be in the top 20 list this year, so they are included OBVIOUSLY.
"Your whole logic is completly inconsistent. You dont put weight on achievements, or current stats, or overall historic stats you all kind of mix it up together so it fits your biases"
- No. My thought process is like this:
- Has the player been performing like a top 20 player in the past 2 years? If so, has he been performing like a superstar?
Pretty simple stuff.