Thread has been deleted
Last comment
ryzen 5 5600X
kreaz | 
Israel rvDxd 
my gpu is rx 570 if i buy 5600x is it gonna be bottleneck ?
2021-09-26 15:56
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
no
2021-09-26 15:57
1 reply
#2
kreaz | 
Israel rvDxd
ty bro
2021-09-26 15:57
#4
 | 
Asia Blitzer
a bit, yes but given the current gpu stock/price scenario it could be worse
2021-09-26 15:59
#6
 | 
Canada JC_123
obviously it depends on the game. in basically anything your GPU will limit you yeah but having a good platform to upgrade upon is great.
2021-09-26 16:03
#8
ropz | 
Romania Laskof
with an rx570, a 5600x is overkill, u should just buy a cheaper cpu and save for gpu maybe i5 10400f or ryzen 3 3100 or smth
2021-09-26 16:04
I mean if you play only CSGO it should be fine considering how heavily CSGO relies on CPU. Certainly It'll be a bottleneck in other games. Idk, it's up to you.
2021-09-26 16:06
#13
 | 
Romania VlakeV
2021-09-26 16:07
i got a ryzen 5600x and my 1660s is a fuckin bottleneck but hey atleast i get 800 fps on csgo
2021-09-26 16:12
17 replies
Yep men me getting 700 on mirage with 1060 3gb and 5600x. Intel can't pull this shit off eveb with 3090.
2021-09-26 17:22
16 replies
lmao, hilarious
2021-09-26 17:54
4 replies
S0mple getting drops to 220 fps on stream with Intel kek
2021-09-26 18:58
3 replies
hes sponsored by ryzen, but alright ignorant kid btw i7 10700 + 1080ti, fps goes up to 1000, ez.
2021-09-26 19:04
2 replies
He's sponsored by ryzen but he's using Intel lmao
2021-09-26 19:13
1 reply
He is using ryzen 5950x
2021-09-26 19:15
Intel will get what, 600fps? Difference between 600fps (~1.67ms) and 700fps (~1.43ms) is about fourth of a single millisecond frametime wise (~0.24ms). That's smaller frametime difference than the between 100fps and 103fps (~0.29ms). Sure it's cool to have bigger number on your net_graph, but you'd have to be beyond superhuman to actually feel such a minute difference.
2021-09-26 18:07
7 replies
Man, AMD Fans can see 0.001ms difference lmao, they're super humans.
2021-09-26 18:08
Average =/= 1 % low and yes on my 390 hz monitor I spot a difference
2021-09-26 18:54
2 replies
You get 700fps for 1% lows? Now that's impressive.
2021-09-26 19:08
1 reply
Na brain
2021-09-26 19:12
> you'd have to be beyond superhuman to actually feel such a minute difference Not necessary. forums.blurbusters.com/viewtopic.php?t=6..
2021-09-26 19:14
2 replies
Not reading all that, but it could help on monitors, as it results in less pixel ghosting. But comparing two systems with the same monitor and 0.24ms difference, impossibru.
2021-09-26 19:16
1 reply
It might be very subtle but even small improvement is still better than nothing.
2021-09-26 19:23
wtf i have 5800x and 1060 6gb and i have 350 fps?????????????????????????????????????
2021-09-26 18:17
2 replies
Are you playing fhd everything maxed out ? I had 545 average fhd all low..
2021-09-26 18:54
1 reply
whats fhd? video settings are all on low
2021-09-26 18:58
i would recommend to buy 5600x now and when gpu prices have lowered from these insane prices to buy better gpu, thats what im doing and i have rx580
2021-09-26 16:12
If anything your GPU will be the bottleneck for most games but that’s not a big issue. Get the 5600x.
2021-09-26 16:37
I don't think 5600x is good match price wise, neither raw nor baked for anything other than csgo. Yes, for csgo as only game good choice, but as 6core it's not best for multitasking. While Ryzen 5 3600 and intel i5 10400f are better value options.
2021-09-26 16:38
12 replies
#30
 | 
Canada JC_123
it is only ever going to be as "slow" as a 3700x in all-core workloads so its pretty damn good for multitasking.
2021-09-26 16:47
9 replies
raw performance in single application/game is different from having multiple running at same time. That's when the extra cores and treads helps, it's not something you can see in benchmark numbers.
2021-09-26 17:14
8 replies
#37
 | 
Canada JC_123
that is not true. If a 6 core cpu is faster when using 100% of its cores than an 8 core cpu using 100% of its cores, the 6 core cpu is still the better multitasker.
2021-09-26 17:17
7 replies
link to evidence?
2021-09-26 17:20
6 replies
#42
 | 
Canada JC_123
2021-09-26 17:26
5 replies
that's single software benchmarks, not measuring differences in multitasking.
2021-09-26 18:00
4 replies
#53
 | 
Canada JC_123
youtu.be/VkfjICH1VqY?t=564 5600x will be faster no matter how many different processes there are because it is faster both multi core and single core. There is no instance where a CPU like a 3700x or 2700x beats it. More separate processes won't take a CPU with fewer cores more time to complete if its cores are faster accordingly.
2021-09-26 18:07
3 replies
Except in the same video you see clear cut difference between 4 and 6+ cores. It isn't so easy to programm a software to properly utilize all cores, because there is just so many processes that a program needs to run simultaneously. It's a different deal when multiple demanding software runs at same time.
2021-09-26 18:14
2 replies
#65
 | 
Canada JC_123
no, having multiple programs running is not going to make the 5600x slower than the 3700x. That's not how it works, that's the main point of the video.
2021-09-26 18:57
#68
 | 
North America 007DBR9
4-6 is a far bigger gap than 6-8 50% core increase to a 33% core increase
2021-09-26 18:58
Dont post without backing up your shit with somethin
2021-09-26 17:50
1 reply
how much fps is necessary for csgo? Does he even have 240hz+ monitor to go with?
2021-09-26 18:00
gpu doesnt matter for cs i assume in cs forum you only gonna play that :d
2021-09-26 16:38
what is ur current cpu btw? 5600x legendary cpu
2021-09-26 16:49
I have both the processor and the graphics card in my pc currently and yes in CS the GPU is a massive bottleneck.
2021-09-26 16:49
3 replies
Forgot to mention that i play at 2560 * 1440 so gpu is gonna get pressured more.
2021-09-26 16:50
2 replies
The GPU is bottle neck even on 800x600. I've tested it with 1060
2021-09-26 17:23
1 reply
makes sense my cpu has 30 to 40% usage while my gpu is maxed out
2021-09-26 17:41
ofcourse it will bottleneck
2021-09-26 16:51
1 reply
no it wont
2021-09-26 18:55
Why my comment was deleted? BUY 10400F BUY 10400F. Or 10600KF. DO NOT BUY RYZEN DO NOT BUY RYZEN
2021-09-26 17:24
8 replies
He has actual brain damage
2021-09-26 17:49
10400f > 3600x
2021-09-26 17:57
3 replies
Right.
2021-09-26 17:58
#55
 | 
Netherlands dabadpad
depends on what u use it or.. gaming = yes gaming + multitask = no
2021-09-26 18:08
1 reply
why is it not better when it comes to multitasking? can you explain your reasoning?
2021-09-26 18:11
nt
2021-09-26 18:19
#69
 | 
North America 007DBR9
how have you not been 10 yeared yet lmao
2021-09-26 18:59
1 reply
Why would I.
2021-09-26 19:03
Probably pretty well matched pair on CSGO (at least at 1080p & below). On most other games the RX570 will bottleneck the shit out of a 5600x even at 1080p.
2021-09-26 17:49
#60
 | 
France Fran6k1D
I have 5800x and1660 super combo and I go up to 400 fps on cs on high rez 144hz and good quality
2021-09-26 18:48
5600x + 1060 +600fps so ez
2021-09-26 18:55
im using it with rtx 3080 so no
2021-09-26 19:05
Would do the trick, don't worry!
2021-09-26 19:15
GPU will be the bottleneck
2021-09-26 19:24
The Amd is like a Cheat Code for CS +200fps for just picking an Ryzen
2021-09-26 19:25
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.