Thread has been deleted
Last comment
I have started to play in 16:9 and AWPing has become more difficult will I get used to it or is it just harder than 4:3?
just get good aim
4 replies
Not respectful
3 replies
it wasn't intended as respect or disrespect, just advice
2 replies
How long have u played 4 3 on?
6 replies
one year
5 replies
Eh, i thing u will need a few days, maybe a week to properly get used to 16 9
4 replies
Well, I switched for like a day to 16:9 from 1024x768, wasn't really hard, ahahahh, just the ViewModel was uncomfortable
3 replies
don't abuse the awp please. just play rifles and u good
3 replies
53 replies
but they are thin
50 replies
49 replies
Rank?
no you are right, that's the advantage of 16:9 - you pretty much cannot get XANTARESPEEKed since the enemies are slower, I've played on both 4:3 & 16:9 for a long time and can confirm this, the "thicker" models on 4:3 are a placebo
47 replies
46 replies
no it's not a placebo since on 4:3 you have less time to react when compared to 16:9 (this is a fact) AND I was talking about the SPEED of the peeks not PEEKER'S ADVANTAGE, obviously the guy who peeks will always have the advantage BUT you have more time to react on 16:9 which means you have a higher chance of winning the fight (you don't lose 100% of the fights if you are not the peeker lol)
45 replies
3 replies
I mean - obviously, on 80+ ping it's definitely near impossible to hold against peeks and win pretty much any of them (I've had ping like that for some time), but I would say on 70> ping 16:9 does make a difference and the lower the ping - the bigger the difference.
29 replies
you have less time to react on 4:3 than on 16:9 (for obv reasons) even tho they technically have the same movement speed, if you don't believe me - just go test it for yourself
21 replies
12 replies
10 replies
9 replies
1) in certain scenarios, due to higher FOV on 16:9, you are able to see the enemy before you would be able to see them on 4:3 = more time to react
2) overall the game is faster on 4:3 - this includes your movement, the enemy's movement, etc. - while this MAY TECHNICALLY JUST BE A PLACEBO, it's a placebo that actually practically works (hence why I don't consider it as a "placebo", whereas "thick models" are truly just a placebo), take this as an example:
- you are playing old D2, you are T spawn with an AWP and you are holding the mid cross, the enemy crosses and you are about to take your shot, on 4:3 your enemy is WIDER but FASTER, meaning you will have a harder time reacting in time, whereas on 16:9 he is THINNER but SLOWER, meaning it will be easier for you to react in time
not so hard to understand, is it?
8 replies
>2) overall the game is faster on 4:3 - this includes your movement, the enemy's movement, etc. - while this MAY TECHNICALLY JUST BE A PLACEBO, it's a placebo that actually practically works (hence why I don't consider it as a "placebo", whereas "thick models" are truly just a placebo), take this as an example:
It's not faster at all you just have less FOV.
>- you are playing old D2, you are T spawn with an AWP and you are holding the mid cross, the enemy crosses and you are about to take your shot, on 4:3 your enemy is WIDER but FASTER, meaning you will have a harder time reacting in time, whereas on 16:9 he is THINNER but SLOWER, meaning it will be easier for you to react in time
First of all the only applies to stretched, secondly his movement speed is the same it still takes him 1 second to cross, so he isn't faster at all.
3 replies
"It's not faster at all you just have less FOV."
- okay so you have only tried one of the resolutions, cool
"First of all the only applies to stretched, secondly his movement speed is the same it still takes him 1 second to cross, so he isn't faster at all."
- first of all - sure, it only applies to stretched, but why bother with BB lmao, 0 advantages (apart from FPS & if you have ADHD)
- secondly - I literally said the same thing you did lol, re-read it ty
2 replies
1 reply
reading comprehension 0?
1) You mean not seeing an enemy on 4:3 that you'd otherwise see on 16:9? It happens like once every 50 games or so, so you can as well ignore it
2) Yeah, on 4:3 models appear to be faster on your screen, but everything's also wider, including the gap between mid double doors from your dust2 scenario, so him being faster and the gap being wider on your screen just cancels out
3 replies
1) it happens way more frequently & even if it was once every 50 games it would be a lot lmao, you are talking like it's nothing lol
2) yes, as I said you could call it a "placebo" but I wouldn't since it's a practical one, we humans are able to react faster to things that are moving slower, so hence why you have more time to react on 16:9 (unless you are an alien)
2 replies
1 reply
well you are most definitely an alien then, I played on both resolutions for 3+ years and when I switched from 4:3 to 16:9 it was like night and day, I would never ever get XANTARESpeeked ever since... maybe I'm just weird tho, who knows
What obvious reasons??
You have exactly the same time to react. The enemy model doesn't appear on your screen at a different time depending on the res you have....
7 replies
lmao just go see for yourself, I cba to explain basic logic to clueless people, legit go load up CS rn and see the difference for yourself
6 replies
Please sir, favor us with your 'basic logic' as we're clearly too clueless to comprehend this intricate cs:go phenomenon
Here's my basic logic:
When your enemy peeks from behind a wall, first you see his shoulder at time 0 on both 16:9 and 4:3, and then he stops moving at time X also on both 16:9 and 4:3, so how do I have less time to react?
5 replies
4 replies
You have given us no logic, only your feelings. Whereas we have given you facts. Taking your example about dust 2 cross - the enemy takes the same time to cross the doors, regardless of resolution. Just...accept it please! Okay?
3 replies
"Taking your example about dust 2 cross - the enemy takes the same time to cross the doors, regardless of resolution."
just by reading this I know your reading comprehension is also equal to 0 lol
2 replies
You can't really be this stupid.
1 reply
I can't, but you clearly can be as you still haven't read/understood what I wrote. Have a nice evening.
5 replies
3 replies
Fix your comment to "I'm not watching a video that disproves my idiotic sentences. Also, I'm just a fake flagger and using my already low IQ to try to take advantage of non-native English speakers in an argument by shaming them instead of using it to lift up some cement bags in the construction area."
2 replies
youtu.be/G1A1-mt7gdU?t=311
5:11 LUL
8 replies
...I don't think I did?
7 replies
6 replies
no, I said thicker models are a placebo while faster enemies aren't...
5 replies
4 replies
that's literally what a placebo is tho, they are wider but so is everything else including your crosshair and the map
3 replies
1 reply
yes obviously, but even if they are thin they are still slow so you have more time to react, #111
generally it's easier to shoot bigger faster targets than smaller and moving slowly.
1 reply
Bigger = Easier to hit
and I've seen tracking of CS pros and it's definitely not true
i would play on 16:9 too but awp is impossible idk why
people usually say its harder to awp on 16:9 but I personally dont think so tbh, I think you will get used to it with time
3 replies
I will give it 1 month
2 replies
not sure if that's gonna be enough, adjusting to 16:9 after playing on 4:3 for a long time usually takes longer than that, I would give it 3 months if I were you at least (if you have the time to do that ofc)
1 reply
oki doke
i got used to it really quick.
Maybe try 16:10 ?
I personaly loved the switch and I even noticed I awped better than 4:3, I used to not touch the awp at all but on 16:10 I have been feeling the scope a lot.
15 replies
6 replies
5 replies
device played 16:9 for a while didnt he? Or did he switch to a higher 4:3 res because of eye strain
2 replies
1 reply
I bet you if s1mple or zywoo played 16:9 for 3 months at least 25% of main awpers would switch
3 replies
1 reply
BIG TRUE, simp fanboys
3 replies
2 replies
I've always played CS(GO) in 4:3 until 1month ago when I switched to 16:9 and it feels just as natural and actually slightly better because of native res crispness and slower moving models.
I tried 16:9 before but couldn't get used to it for whatever reason as something seemed off, until I tried EliGE's viewmodel (from my usual presetpos 3) and it all suddenly clicked for me. I was gunning just as good as I usually do in 4:3. While it is a weird solution maybe try other pro players "visual" settings?
7 replies
Just because the models are smaller doesn't mean that you have to be more precise. Your crosshair will move the same distance for identical mouse movements regardless of the resolution. Or am I missing something?
6 replies
3 replies
Yes, I understand that. But the amount of mouse movement to get from one side of the model to the other side of the model will be the same regardless of res if your sens is the same right?
2 replies
Nope, if you use res lower than native & use stretched scaling, it will change.
For example, if you use 1280*960 stretched in 1080p 16:9 monitor, your amount of mouse movements will change, be it across display or across the models (they'd appear wider in stretched res). #93
But if you play 1280*960 blackbars in same monitor, the mouse movements will be the same as in any 16:9 resolution.
1 reply
But changing to a stretched res doesn't make a difference as the FOV is not changing, only the way it is displayed on your monitor is changed. So going from a non-native res to the same res stretched won't change how much your crosshair moves per mouse movement. It feels like it does granted, but in actual fact doesn't make a difference.
Your horizontal & vertical movements will be faster & slower respectively in 4:3 stretched compared to 4:3 blackbars or 16:9 native scaling.
1 reply
Been playing native for 2 years and became much better but i cant awp for shit anymore, cant hit shots idk if its 16:9, sucks because my playstyle fits awping and i get so many free kills with it but i whiff them :/
2 replies
cant no scope with awp in native res at all
in 4:3 I will near certain where the noscope will hit
1 reply
this is just you not being used to the position on your screen when switching, i main 16:9 and have no trouble lining up noscopes
i feel better with every single weapon on 16:9
but it all comes down to personal preference bro...
4 replies
It's actually easier with AWP in 16:9 because the hitboxes are slower
put it this way the best 16:9 awper in the world is fl0m
3 replies
meh
1 reply
fl0m is better than all of these players
Lol I don't think there's any difference at all. I feel better playing (rifling and awping) in 16:9 than 4:3. Other players feel the opposite.
in 16:9 i feel i play better than 4:3 but I have to focus for the full game otherwise I will get fked
idk why but I control spray better in native res too maybe cuz of better pixel quality idk
but it fucks up my sens
might feel tougher but tis the best
I switched yesterday. Rifles and deagles are so ez but awping sometimes suck.
U can get used to it or just play smth like 1444*1080. It's like 16:9 res in 4:3, so u have more streched res
I play on 16:9 from the beggining and i feel really good on the awp. I would recommend you to adjust viewmodels and cl_bob to your own preferences and adjust your sensitivity and aim to the new resolution. Spend some time on aim botz, play wingmans or casuals and obviously don't rage if something's going wrong. Personally, i think 16:9 is a better option if you have a good aim/play awp. Also, i would recommend you to play on the highest resolution possible, maybe with low settings, but play on full hd (if you can obviously) U just need some time to get used to new settings. Gl mate!
Now playing
Buster
20512 viewers
Top streams
All(57)
Casters(34)
Streamers(13)
Organizers(10)
Buster
(20512)
kennyS
(7581)
REPUBLEAGUE
(3495)
RTP Arena
(2932)
ROOT
(2900)
nak
(2807)
Maincast
(2739)
META
(2509)
D0cC
(2007)
ESL TV
(1907)
ESL TV C
(1837)
WePlay
(1735)
GODSENT
(1579)
jaxi
(1239)
Saju
(1213)
FlipiN
(1169)
UCC
(1066)
mch
(1066)
Apoka
(840)
Lobanjica
(767)
magixx
(734)
Elisa Esports
(569)
WePlay
(533)
sL4M
(413)
CEE Champions
(332)
Werty
(281)
KRL
(246)
LeetEsport
(232)
1mpala
(213)
Brosskiez
(202)
OverDrive
(199)
draken
(185)
watchfulTV 2
(127)
DEVIL
(89)
Eldorado Esport
(81)
Majki
(71)
cutzmeretz
(70)
REPUBLEAGUE
(60)
watchfulTV
(47)
FURIOUSSS
(44)
Fragster
(43)
zon1Q
(26)
Nexus
(25)
WePlay (YouTube)
(23)
WePlay (YouTube)
(22)
Budapest Five
(21)
HONORIS
(18)
Nemiga
(12)
Esportal
(12)
SCL
(11)
Loff3
(7)
Infinite Gaming
(7)
SandeN
(6)
Riley
(5)
Entropiq
(5)
BeHopGG
(4)
Allied Esports
(3)
