Thread has been deleted
Last comment
16:9 PLAYERS COME
 | 
United Kingdom __UKCS_FAN 
I have started to play in 16:9 and AWPing has become more difficult will I get used to it or is it just harder than 4:3?
2022-01-15 22:06
Topics are hidden when running Sport mode.
just get good aim
2022-01-15 22:07
4 replies
#6
 | 
United Kingdom __UKCS_FAN
Not respectful
2022-01-15 22:08
3 replies
it wasn't intended as respect or disrespect, just advice
2022-01-15 22:09
2 replies
#11
 | 
United Kingdom __UKCS_FAN
Respectable
2022-01-15 22:10
1 reply
just get used to it
2022-01-16 15:56
#2
 | 
Ukraine Slavv_Boss
How long have u played 4 3 on?
2022-01-15 22:07
6 replies
#3
 | 
United Kingdom __UKCS_FAN
one year
2022-01-15 22:08
5 replies
#7
 | 
Ukraine Slavv_Boss
Eh, i thing u will need a few days, maybe a week to properly get used to 16 9
2022-01-15 22:08
4 replies
Well, I switched for like a day to 16:9 from 1024x768, wasn't really hard, ahahahh, just the ViewModel was uncomfortable
2022-01-15 23:25
3 replies
#91
 | 
United States Goob
wow good for you no one asked and no one car
2022-01-16 04:39
2 replies
wow good for you no one asked and no one cars
2022-01-16 05:02
1 reply
#103
 | 
United States Goob
2022-01-16 05:56
don't abuse the awp please. just play rifles and u good
2022-01-15 22:08
3 replies
Name doesn't check out
2022-01-15 22:14
2 replies
#92
 | 
United States Goob
his name does check out, he is the rifle non baiter
2022-01-16 04:39
1 reply
Like NiKo GOAT
2022-01-20 20:34
#5
 | 
Croatia Momaq
imo its easier because the players are way slower
2022-01-15 22:08
53 replies
#8
 | 
United Kingdom __UKCS_FAN
but they are thin
2022-01-15 22:08
50 replies
#10
 | 
Croatia Momaq
yea but they peek way slower maybe its like that for me because ive always played on 16 9
2022-01-15 22:10
49 replies
#12
 | 
United Kingdom __UKCS_FAN
Rank?
2022-01-15 22:10
no you are right, that's the advantage of 16:9 - you pretty much cannot get XANTARESPEEKed since the enemies are slower, I've played on both 4:3 & 16:9 for a long time and can confirm this, the "thicker" models on 4:3 are a placebo
2022-01-15 22:21
47 replies
"not getting xantaresepeeked on 16:9" is a placebo, it is how game works and how peeker's advantage works. no matter how fast you'd react, peeking guy always has advantage since he sees you first. and res has nothing to do with it.
2022-01-15 22:30
46 replies
no it's not a placebo since on 4:3 you have less time to react when compared to 16:9 (this is a fact) AND I was talking about the SPEED of the peeks not PEEKER'S ADVANTAGE, obviously the guy who peeks will always have the advantage BUT you have more time to react on 16:9 which means you have a higher chance of winning the fight (you don't lose 100% of the fights if you are not the peeker lol)
2022-01-15 22:36
45 replies
maybe on low ping it's like that. on 80+ ping you lose 100% of the fights, no matter what res/settings/sens are you using. I do get that there's no peeker's advantage on LAN, but online idk. maybe on low ping.
2022-01-15 22:50
3 replies
I mean - obviously, on 80+ ping it's definitely near impossible to hold against peeks and win pretty much any of them (I've had ping like that for some time), but I would say on 70> ping 16:9 does make a difference and the lower the ping - the bigger the difference.
2022-01-15 22:53
#125
 | 
Romania Anqhor
people playing with 80+ ping are outliers and should not be counted
2022-01-16 14:37
1 reply
True
2022-01-20 20:34
how does a resolution make people faster lol
2022-01-15 23:37
29 replies
because its stretched out. your mouse will go faster too from side to side
2022-01-15 23:39
you have less time to react on 4:3 than on 16:9 (for obv reasons) even tho they technically have the same movement speed, if you don't believe me - just go test it for yourself
2022-01-15 23:46
21 replies
#51
2022-01-16 00:42
12 replies
Chutmarike read #59
2022-01-16 01:54
2022-01-16 11:18
10 replies
Basic logic implies that a resolution doesn't affect speed
2022-01-16 13:40
9 replies
1) in certain scenarios, due to higher FOV on 16:9, you are able to see the enemy before you would be able to see them on 4:3 = more time to react 2) overall the game is faster on 4:3 - this includes your movement, the enemy's movement, etc. - while this MAY TECHNICALLY JUST BE A PLACEBO, it's a placebo that actually practically works (hence why I don't consider it as a "placebo", whereas "thick models" are truly just a placebo), take this as an example: - you are playing old D2, you are T spawn with an AWP and you are holding the mid cross, the enemy crosses and you are about to take your shot, on 4:3 your enemy is WIDER but FASTER, meaning you will have a harder time reacting in time, whereas on 16:9 he is THINNER but SLOWER, meaning it will be easier for you to react in time not so hard to understand, is it?
2022-01-16 14:29
8 replies
>2) overall the game is faster on 4:3 - this includes your movement, the enemy's movement, etc. - while this MAY TECHNICALLY JUST BE A PLACEBO, it's a placebo that actually practically works (hence why I don't consider it as a "placebo", whereas "thick models" are truly just a placebo), take this as an example: It's not faster at all you just have less FOV. >- you are playing old D2, you are T spawn with an AWP and you are holding the mid cross, the enemy crosses and you are about to take your shot, on 4:3 your enemy is WIDER but FASTER, meaning you will have a harder time reacting in time, whereas on 16:9 he is THINNER but SLOWER, meaning it will be easier for you to react in time First of all the only applies to stretched, secondly his movement speed is the same it still takes him 1 second to cross, so he isn't faster at all.
2022-01-16 14:31
3 replies
"It's not faster at all you just have less FOV." - okay so you have only tried one of the resolutions, cool "First of all the only applies to stretched, secondly his movement speed is the same it still takes him 1 second to cross, so he isn't faster at all." - first of all - sure, it only applies to stretched, but why bother with BB lmao, 0 advantages (apart from FPS & if you have ADHD) - secondly - I literally said the same thing you did lol, re-read it ty
2022-01-16 14:39
2 replies
He's not slower in anyway, he is still visible for the exact same amount of time
2022-01-16 14:41
1 reply
reading comprehension 0?
2022-01-16 14:43
#131
 | 
Poland DefeN
1) You mean not seeing an enemy on 4:3 that you'd otherwise see on 16:9? It happens like once every 50 games or so, so you can as well ignore it 2) Yeah, on 4:3 models appear to be faster on your screen, but everything's also wider, including the gap between mid double doors from your dust2 scenario, so him being faster and the gap being wider on your screen just cancels out
2022-01-16 14:55
3 replies
1) it happens way more frequently & even if it was once every 50 games it would be a lot lmao, you are talking like it's nothing lol 2) yes, as I said you could call it a "placebo" but I wouldn't since it's a practical one, we humans are able to react faster to things that are moving slower, so hence why you have more time to react on 16:9 (unless you are an alien)
2022-01-16 15:00
2 replies
#138
 | 
Poland DefeN
For the sake of science I downloaded that dust2 double door training map, and played it on 16:9 and 4:3 stretched. The results are pretty much the same. Turns out I'm an alien
2022-01-16 15:54
1 reply
well you are most definitely an alien then, I played on both resolutions for 3+ years and when I switched from 4:3 to 16:9 it was like night and day, I would never ever get XANTARESpeeked ever since... maybe I'm just weird tho, who knows
2022-01-16 15:58
What obvious reasons?? You have exactly the same time to react. The enemy model doesn't appear on your screen at a different time depending on the res you have....
2022-01-16 02:32
7 replies
lmao just go see for yourself, I cba to explain basic logic to clueless people, legit go load up CS rn and see the difference for yourself
2022-01-16 11:18
6 replies
#120
 | 
Poland DefeN
Please sir, favor us with your 'basic logic' as we're clearly too clueless to comprehend this intricate cs:go phenomenon Here's my basic logic: When your enemy peeks from behind a wall, first you see his shoulder at time 0 on both 16:9 and 4:3, and then he stops moving at time X also on both 16:9 and 4:3, so how do I have less time to react?
2022-01-16 14:07
5 replies
2022-01-16 14:28
4 replies
You have given us no logic, only your feelings. Whereas we have given you facts. Taking your example about dust 2 cross - the enemy takes the same time to cross the doors, regardless of resolution. Just...accept it please! Okay?
2022-01-17 19:46
3 replies
"Taking your example about dust 2 cross - the enemy takes the same time to cross the doors, regardless of resolution." just by reading this I know your reading comprehension is also equal to 0 lol
2022-01-17 20:15
2 replies
You can't really be this stupid.
2022-01-18 00:10
1 reply
I can't, but you clearly can be as you still haven't read/understood what I wrote. Have a nice evening.
2022-01-18 00:22
2022-01-16 02:21
5 replies
im not watching a score video
2022-01-16 02:33
3 replies
Fix your comment to "I'm not watching a video that disproves my idiotic sentences. Also, I'm just a fake flagger and using my already low IQ to try to take advantage of non-native English speakers in an argument by shaming them instead of using it to lift up some cement bags in the construction area."
2022-01-16 02:57
2 replies
I agree you would be more useful lifting cement bags than trying to speak English.
2022-01-16 03:52
1 reply
Can't even reply and trying to use my sentence against me. Pathetic. Get well soon. Wish you the best.
2022-01-16 04:10
2022-01-16 07:39
#56
 | 
Finland C4shew
idc bout your comment but you said thing is placebo to saying thing is not placebo
2022-01-16 01:30
8 replies
...I don't think I did?
2022-01-16 11:20
7 replies
#137
 | 
Finland C4shew
you said thicker models on 4:3 is placebo then went on to say no it's not a placebo since on 4:3
2022-01-16 15:54
6 replies
no, I said thicker models are a placebo while faster enemies aren't...
2022-01-16 15:55
5 replies
#162
 | 
Finland C4shew
Thats wrong, neither is a placebo. You might not see a difference but they stretch the screen making the opponent more thicker
2022-01-17 20:01
4 replies
that's literally what a placebo is tho, they are wider but so is everything else including your crosshair and the map
2022-01-17 20:17
3 replies
#171
 | 
Finland C4shew
thats not a placebo, placebo is a thing you think are having/doing and its not actually doing. but wider things are real
2022-01-19 17:09
2 replies
okay I'm getting baited have a nice evening
2022-01-19 17:40
1 reply
#174
 | 
Finland C4shew
nah u just have polish education system
2022-01-20 20:25
you're so wrong, on 16:9, models are slow but thin af, on 4;3, models are thick like Latinas but fast af, this is a fact not some placebo, if you can't detect this then csgo ain't for you.
2022-01-16 07:12
1 reply
yes obviously, but even if they are thin they are still slow so you have more time to react, #111
2022-01-16 11:21
generally it's easier to shoot bigger faster targets than smaller and moving slowly.
2022-01-15 23:33
1 reply
Bigger = Easier to hit and I've seen tracking of CS pros and it's definitely not true
2022-01-17 20:00
i would play on 16:9 too but awp is impossible idk why
2022-01-15 22:12
2 replies
#14
 | 
United Kingdom __UKCS_FAN
That's what I'm struggling with
2022-01-15 22:14
Nt ropz
2022-01-16 02:22
people usually say its harder to awp on 16:9 but I personally dont think so tbh, I think you will get used to it with time
2022-01-15 22:15
3 replies
#17
 | 
United Kingdom __UKCS_FAN
I will give it 1 month
2022-01-15 22:17
2 replies
not sure if that's gonna be enough, adjusting to 16:9 after playing on 4:3 for a long time usually takes longer than that, I would give it 3 months if I were you at least (if you have the time to do that ofc)
2022-01-15 22:23
1 reply
#21
 | 
United Kingdom __UKCS_FAN
oki doke
2022-01-15 22:23
i got used to it really quick.
2022-01-15 22:22
Maybe try 16:10 ? I personaly loved the switch and I even noticed I awped better than 4:3, I used to not touch the awp at all but on 16:10 I have been feeling the scope a lot.
2022-01-15 22:26
#23
 | 
Czech Republic Sybas
awping on 16:9 is not good, stay on 4:3, you have literally zero awpers on top30 teams, if i doesnt count lucky from astralis
2022-01-15 22:26
15 replies
#24
 | 
Czech Republic Sybas
16:10 could be the way tho
2022-01-15 22:27
6 replies
awping on 16:9 is good if you hold angles like device, also pistols are really good on 16:9
2022-01-15 23:32
5 replies
device played 16:9 for a while didnt he? Or did he switch to a higher 4:3 res because of eye strain
2022-01-15 23:35
2 replies
he plays all time black bars 4:3 s1mple and zywoo don't play 16:9 because they miss their shots
2022-01-16 00:16
#163
 | 
Italy steven513
He did play with 1920x1080, but I think he switched back because he didn't like it, so all of that despite the eye strain.
2022-01-17 20:03
"pistols are really good on 16:9" can you explain this a bit? I thought it was easier in 4:3 because you see watermelon heads.
2022-01-16 15:03
1 reply
when you have p250 guy literally pre peeking angle you can see his elbow on 16:9 before he peeks u or atleast half of body it gives you 1s more to reposition and take him down. Obviously when he jiggles
2022-01-16 17:24
I bet you if s1mple or zywoo played 16:9 for 3 months at least 25% of main awpers would switch
2022-01-15 23:34
3 replies
#40
 | 
Hungary zy_k
zywoo and device switched for some time then both of them switched back
2022-01-15 23:41
1 reply
#164
 | 
Italy steven513
+1
2022-01-17 20:03
BIG TRUE, simp fanboys
2022-01-15 23:49
#179
 | 
Hungary Leviax
why would you look at pro players to make your decision?
2022-01-20 20:43
3 replies
#180
 | 
Czech Republic Sybas
cuz it have a reason with the models being more stretched and easier to spot and everything, its just not good
2022-01-20 21:46
2 replies
#181
 | 
Hungary Leviax
i'm just saying just because pro players do something doesn't mean it's right, just look at how all the pros overlooked the krieg for 6 years
2022-01-21 14:18
1 reply
#185
 | 
Czech Republic Sybas
yes, you are right, but the awping thing isnt good fr
2022-01-21 14:36
I've always played CS(GO) in 4:3 until 1month ago when I switched to 16:9 and it feels just as natural and actually slightly better because of native res crispness and slower moving models. I tried 16:9 before but couldn't get used to it for whatever reason as something seemed off, until I tried EliGE's viewmodel (from my usual presetpos 3) and it all suddenly clicked for me. I was gunning just as good as I usually do in 4:3. While it is a weird solution maybe try other pro players "visual" settings?
2022-01-15 22:59
#36
 | 
United States gweees
Go into aimbotz and put the bots on the farthest they can go and just shoot them for a while. You just need to make your aim more precise because the models are smaller.
2022-01-15 23:36
7 replies
Just because the models are smaller doesn't mean that you have to be more precise. Your crosshair will move the same distance for identical mouse movements regardless of the resolution. Or am I missing something?
2022-01-16 02:36
6 replies
#78
 | 
United States gweees
the models physically take up less pixels on 16:9 compared to 4:3 stretched considering the two sides of your viewmodel arent chopped off.
2022-01-16 03:27
3 replies
Yes, I understand that. But the amount of mouse movement to get from one side of the model to the other side of the model will be the same regardless of res if your sens is the same right?
2022-01-17 19:49
2 replies
Nope, if you use res lower than native & use stretched scaling, it will change. For example, if you use 1280*960 stretched in 1080p 16:9 monitor, your amount of mouse movements will change, be it across display or across the models (they'd appear wider in stretched res). #93 But if you play 1280*960 blackbars in same monitor, the mouse movements will be the same as in any 16:9 resolution.
2022-01-18 02:51
1 reply
But changing to a stretched res doesn't make a difference as the FOV is not changing, only the way it is displayed on your monitor is changed. So going from a non-native res to the same res stretched won't change how much your crosshair moves per mouse movement. It feels like it does granted, but in actual fact doesn't make a difference.
2022-01-20 14:49
Your horizontal & vertical movements will be faster & slower respectively in 4:3 stretched compared to 4:3 blackbars or 16:9 native scaling.
2022-01-16 04:51
1 reply
2022-01-17 19:49
it depends on which aspect ratio you're used to. I've been playing 16:9 for almost 7 years now and I always thought awp'ing is easier.
2022-01-15 23:42
Been playing native for 2 years and became much better but i cant awp for shit anymore, cant hit shots idk if its 16:9, sucks because my playstyle fits awping and i get so many free kills with it but i whiff them :/
2022-01-15 23:47
2 replies
cant no scope with awp in native res at all in 4:3 I will near certain where the noscope will hit
2022-01-16 05:01
1 reply
this is just you not being used to the position on your screen when switching, i main 16:9 and have no trouble lining up noscopes
2022-01-16 20:44
#46
 | 
Portugal Yelus
You will get used to it. Try it for 3/5 weeks. If you don't like it then change it
2022-01-15 23:53
i feel better with every single weapon on 16:9 but it all comes down to personal preference bro...
2022-01-16 00:43
#69
 | 
Togo BRON0
4:3 ugly and every time i tab out it takes like 4 seconds instead of the instant 16:9
2022-01-16 02:17
4 replies
it takes 4 secs bc ur pc res is 16:9 thats why
2022-01-16 15:18
3 replies
#143
 | 
Togo BRON0
yeah, i dont want my pc res to be 4:3
2022-01-16 17:15
2 replies
+1
2022-01-16 17:29
+1
2022-01-20 20:36
It's actually easier with AWP in 16:9 because the hitboxes are slower
2022-01-16 02:27
Personally I feel reverse, you're just used to the different width of the scope but yes after my switch I struggled but it becomes way easier.
2022-01-16 02:35
#85
 | 
United States cmohr
you wont be as good on the awp probably, but rifling becomes way easier
2022-01-16 04:16
#90
 | 
Finland notits
4:3 is better in every way
2022-01-16 04:19
put it this way the best 16:9 awper in the world is fl0m
2022-01-16 04:56
3 replies
meh
2022-01-16 05:00
#117
 | 
Serbia VasaLav
TABSEN? AFRO? JW? GRATISFACTION? BUBBLE? MAKA? KRYSTAL?????? HELLO?????
2022-01-16 13:34
1 reply
fl0m is better than all of these players
2022-01-16 16:50
Lol I don't think there's any difference at all. I feel better playing (rifling and awping) in 16:9 than 4:3. Other players feel the opposite.
2022-01-16 04:58
in 16:9 i feel i play better than 4:3 but I have to focus for the full game otherwise I will get fked idk why but I control spray better in native res too maybe cuz of better pixel quality idk but it fucks up my sens
2022-01-16 05:00
might feel tougher but tis the best
2022-01-16 05:13
go 16:10 men
2022-01-16 09:20
#116
 | 
Serbia VasaLav
it makes awping easier for me since im shit at tracking and players move slower
2022-01-16 13:31
#118
 | 
Philippines H0xfrey
changing your res will also change your sens, it can explain why its harder to aim awp
2022-01-16 13:33
#124
 | 
CIS kuuler
Because m_yaw is not proprotional on 4:3. Just play more until you get comfy or change zoom sensitivity
2022-01-16 14:34
I switched yesterday. Rifles and deagles are so ez but awping sometimes suck. U can get used to it or just play smth like 1444*1080. It's like 16:9 res in 4:3, so u have more streched res
2022-01-16 15:11
no shit its harder. now you are playing against fitness people
2022-01-16 17:24
#147
 | 
Israel Asi_16
playing awp a lot on 16:9, played a bit of 4:3 cant get used to it. playing 16:9 for almost 5 years and mainly awping so u will get used to it
2022-01-16 17:29
I play on 16:9 from the beggining and i feel really good on the awp. I would recommend you to adjust viewmodels and cl_bob to your own preferences and adjust your sensitivity and aim to the new resolution. Spend some time on aim botz, play wingmans or casuals and obviously don't rage if something's going wrong. Personally, i think 16:9 is a better option if you have a good aim/play awp. Also, i would recommend you to play on the highest resolution possible, maybe with low settings, but play on full hd (if you can obviously) U just need some time to get used to new settings. Gl mate!
2022-01-16 18:16
Awp is not made for 16:9
2022-01-18 04:39
1 reply
+1 awp made for weak players to farm rating
2022-01-21 14:22
#184
 | 
Germany Matrixrl1
changing res is always a big deal for me. just try to not think about the res change at all and try to do what you usually do to warmup or prac.
2022-01-21 14:22
Login or register to add your comment to the discussion.
Now playing
Thumbnail for stream
Russia
Buster
20512 viewers
Top streams
All(57)
Casters(34)
Streamers(13)
Organizers(10)
Russia
Buster
(20512)
France
kennyS
(7581)
Other
REPUBLEAGUE
(3495)
Portugal
RTP Arena
(2932)
Turkey
ROOT
(2900)
Brazil
nak
(2807)
Russia
Maincast
(2739)
Mongolia
META
(2509)
Netherlands
D0cC
(2007)
United Kingdom
ESL TV
(1907)
United Kingdom
ESL TV C
(1837)
Other
WePlay
(1735)
Brazil
GODSENT
(1579)
Romania
jaxi
(1239)
Poland
Saju
(1213)
Spain
FlipiN
(1169)
Russia
UCC
(1066)
Brazil
mch
(1066)
Brazil
Apoka
(840)
Montenegro
Lobanjica
(767)
Russia
magixx
(734)
Other
Elisa Esports
(569)
Ukraine
WePlay
(533)
Russia
sL4M
(413)
Other
CEE Champions
(332)
Romania
Werty
(281)
France
KRL
(246)
Hungary
LeetEsport
(232)
Ukraine
1mpala
(213)
Turkey
Brosskiez
(202)
Russia
OverDrive
(199)
Sweden
draken
(185)
Russia
watchfulTV 2
(127)
France
DEVIL
(89)
Norway
Eldorado Esport
(81)
Poland
Majki
(71)
Brazil
cutzmeretz
(70)
Slovakia
REPUBLEAGUE
(60)
Russia
watchfulTV
(47)
Other
FURIOUSSS
(44)
Germany
Fragster
(43)
Serbia
zon1Q
(26)
Romania
Nexus
(25)
Other
WePlay (YouTube)
(23)
Ukraine
WePlay (YouTube)
(22)
Hungary
Budapest Five
(21)
Poland
HONORIS
(18)
Belarus
Nemiga
(12)
Sweden
Esportal
(12)
Other
SCL
(11)
Sweden
Loff3
(7)
Romania
Infinite Gaming
(7)
Denmark
SandeN
(6)
Russia
Riley
(5)
Czech Republic
Entropiq
(5)
France
BeHopGG
(4)
Other
Allied Esports
(3)