Entire group stage only to determine seeding for play-ins, where 3 teams get eliminated, 3 teams go through and the rest plays once again one more game to find out the 3 remaining advancing teams.
Isn't it a bit overcomplicated for no reason? Last season we just had BO3 groups and it seemed fine
i dont think you should go through based on 3 best of ones , better to play at least 1 best of 3. I do think that usually the ppl winning the best of ones will win the best of 3 but you never know
more games = more revenue from ads and sponsors + more opportunities for blatant matchfix = more money for BLAST to keep up with their production and prize pools